RESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Glioblastoma is the commonest primary brain cancer in adults whose outcomes are amongst the worst of any cancer. The current treatment pathway comprises surgery and postoperative chemoradiotherapy though unresectable diffusely infiltrative tumour cells remain untreated for several weeks post-diagnosis. Intratumoural heterogeneity combined with increased hypoxia in the postoperative tumour microenvironment potentially decreases the efficacy of adjuvant interventions and fails to prevent early postoperative regrowth, called rapid early progression (REP). In this review, we discuss the clinical implications and biological foundations of post-surgery REP. Subsequently, clinical interventions potentially targeting this phenomenon are reviewed systematically. RECENT FINDINGS: Early interventions include early systemic chemotherapy, neoadjuvant immunotherapy, local therapies delivered during surgery (including Gliadel wafers, nanoparticles and stem cell therapy) and several radiotherapy techniques. We critically appraise and compare these strategies in terms of their efficacy, toxicity, challenges and potential to prolong survival. Finally, we discuss the most promising strategies that could benefit future glioblastoma patients. There is biological rationale to suggest that early interventions could improve the outcome of glioblastoma patients and they should be investigated in future trials.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioblastoma , Adulto , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Carmustina/uso terapêutico , Quimiorradioterapia , Glioblastoma/tratamento farmacológico , Glioblastoma/terapia , Humanos , Microambiente TumoralRESUMO
Biomaterials to treat cancers hold therapeutic potential; however, their translation to bedside treatment requires further study. The carmustine (1,3-bis (2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea; BCNU) wafer, a biodegradable polymer, currently is the only drug that is able to be placed at the surgical site to treat malignant tumors. However, how this wafer affects the surrounding tumor microenvironment is not well understood to date. We retrospectively reviewed all patients with glioblastoma treated with and without BCNU wafers who underwent repeat resection at tumor recurrence. We investigated radiological imaging; the interval between the two surgeries; and immunohistochemistry of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, FOXP3, and PD1. We implanted BCNU wafers in 41 newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients after approval of the wafer in Japan. Of them, 14 underwent surgery at recurrence and tissue was obtained from around the wafers. The interval between the first and second surgeries ranged from 63 to 421 days. The wafer could be observed on magnetic resonance imaging at up to 226 days, whereas intraoperatively the biodegraded material of the wafer could be found at up to 421 days after the initial surgery. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated that CD8+ and CD68+ cells were significantly increased, but FOXP3+ cells did not increase, after wafer implantation compared to tissue from cases without wafer implantation. MRI data and immune cells, as well as interval between surgeries and immune cells, demonstrated positive correlation. These results helped us to understand the bioactivity of bioengineered materials and to establish a new approach for immunotherapy.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administração & dosagem , Carmustina/administração & dosagem , Microambiente Tumoral/efeitos dos fármacos , Microambiente Tumoral/imunologia , Implantes Absorvíveis , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores Tumorais/imunologia , Encéfalo/efeitos dos fármacos , Encéfalo/imunologia , Encéfalo/patologia , Encéfalo/cirurgia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/imunologia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Criança , Feminino , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Glioblastoma/tratamento farmacológico , Glioblastoma/imunologia , Glioblastoma/cirurgia , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagem , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/imunologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Carmustine wafers are approved for localized treatment of malignant glioma. In this study, overall changes in computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images of malignant glioma patients treated with carmustine wafer implantation were evaluated. The subjects were 25 patients undergoing craniotomy for malignant glioma resection and carmustine wafer implantation. Changes in the appearance of wafers, the resection cavity, and the adjacent parenchyma on CT and MR imaging were evaluated retrospectively. On CT, the wafers changed from an initially high-dense to an iso-dense appearance. All MR studies showed a low-intense wafer within 2 days. The wafers changed to a high- or iso-intense appearance on fluid attenuated inversion recovery and T1-weighted imaging, whereas they changed to an iso- to low-intense appearance on T2-weighted imaging. Gas in the cavity increased gradually after surgery, achieved a peak at 1 week postoperatively, and then disappeared in 1-3 months. Increased volume of the resection cavity was observed in 48% of patients. Regarding changes in the adjacent parenchyma, obvious contrast enhancement at the wall of the resection cavity was seen in 91% of cases at 1 month, but this disappeared gradually. Edema around the resection cavity was increased in 7 patients (28%), of whom only two experienced symptoms due to edema. We conclude that these radiological changes after carmustine wafer implantation should be carefully followed up, because these changes can easily be mistaken for infectious disease or recurrent tumors.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Carmustina/administração & dosagem , Glioma/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Seguimentos , Glioma/patologia , Humanos , Bombas de Infusão Implantáveis , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Since 2003, only two chemotherapeutic agents, evaluated in phase III trials, have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma (HGG): Gliadel wafers (intracranially implanted local chemotherapy) and temozolomide (TMZ) (systemic chemotherapy). Neither agent is curative, but each has been shown to improve median overall survival (OS) compared to radiotherapy (RT) alone. To date, no phase III trial has tested these agents when used in sequential combination; however, a number of smaller trials have reported favorable results. We performed a systematic literature review to evaluate the combination of Gliadel wafers with standard RT (60 Gy) plus concurrent and adjuvant TMZ (RT/TMZ) for newly diagnosed HGG. A literature search was conducted for the period of January 1995 to September 2015. Data were extracted and categorized, and means and ranges were determined. A total of 11 publications met criteria, three prospective trials and eight retrospective studies, representing 411 patients who received Gliadel plus standard RT/TMZ. Patients were similar in age, gender, and performance status. The weighted mean of median OS was 18.2 months (ten trials, n = 379, range 12.7 to 21.3 months), and the weighted mean of median progression-free survival was 9.7 months (seven trials, n = 287, range 7 to 12.9 months). The most commonly reported grade 3 and 4 adverse events were myelosuppression (10.22 %), neurologic deficit (7.8 %), and healing abnormalities (4.3 %). Adverse events reflected the distinct independent safety profiles of Gliadel wafers and RT/TMZ, with little evidence of enhanced toxicity from their use in sequential combination. In the 11 identified trials, an increased benefit from sequentially combining Gliadel wafers with RT/TMZ was strongly suggested. Median OS tended to be improved by 3 to 4 months beyond that observed for Gliadel wafers or TMZ when used alone in the respective phase III trials. Larger prospective trials of Gliadel plus RT/TMZ are warranted.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/patologia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Carmustina/uso terapêutico , Dacarbazina/análogos & derivados , Ácidos Decanoicos/uso terapêutico , Glioblastoma/patologia , Glioblastoma/terapia , Poliésteres/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Carmustina/administração & dosagem , Carmustina/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Dacarbazina/administração & dosagem , Dacarbazina/efeitos adversos , Dacarbazina/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Decanoicos/administração & dosagem , Ácidos Decanoicos/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Implantes de Medicamento , Glioblastoma/mortalidade , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Poliésteres/administração & dosagem , Poliésteres/efeitos adversos , Temozolomida , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMO
With emerging drug delivery technologies becoming accessible, more options are expected to become available to patients with glioblastoma (GBM) in the near future. It is important for clinicians to be familiar with the underlying mechanisms and limitations of intratumoral drug delivery, and direction of recent research efforts. Tumor-adjacent brain is an extremely complex living matrix that creates challenges with normal tissue intertwining with tumor cells. For convection-enhanced delivery (CED), the role of tissue anisotropy for better predicting the biodistribution of the infusate has recently been studied. Computational predictive methods are now available to better plan CED therapy. Catheter design and placementin addition to the agent being usedare critical components of any protocol. This paper overviews intratumoral therapies for GBM, highlighting key anatomic and physiologic perspectives, selected agents (especially immunotoxins), and some new developments such as the description of the glymphatic system.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos , Glioblastoma/tratamento farmacológico , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos/métodos , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos/tendências , HumanosRESUMO
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor and carries a grave prognosis. Despite years of research investigating potentially new therapies for GBM, the median survival rate of individuals with this disease has remained fairly stagnant. Delivery of drugs to the tumor site is hampered by various barriers posed by the GBM pathological process and by the complex physiology of the blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers. These anatomical and physiological barriers serve as a natural protection for the brain and preserve brain homeostasis, but they also have significantly limited the reach of intraparenchymal treatments in patients with GBM. In this article, the authors review the functional capabilities of the physical and physiological barriers that impede chemotherapy for GBM, with a specific focus on the pathological alterations of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in this disease. They also provide an overview of current and future methods for circumventing these barriers in therapeutic interventions. Although ongoing research has yielded some potential options for future GBM therapies, delivery of chemotherapy medications across the BBB remains elusive and has limited the efficacy of these medications.
Assuntos
Transporte Biológico/fisiologia , Barreira Hematoencefálica/efeitos dos fármacos , Barreira Hematoencefálica/patologia , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos , Barreira Hematoencefálica/metabolismo , Barreira Hematoencefálica/fisiologia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Glioblastoma/tratamento farmacológico , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECT: Significant haemorrhage following intracranial tumour resection may occur in 1-2% of cases and the majority occur within the first few hours post-operatively. Implantation of carmustine wafers has been associated with increased operative site complications in some series, but post-operative haematoma is not routinely reported. We analyzed the characteristics of post-operative haemorrhage after carmustine wafer insertion. METHODS: We performed a retrospective audit of surgical site haematoma after tumour resection and insertion of carmustine wafers in two neurosurgical units in the UK (University Hospital of North Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent, March 2003 - July 2012; Wessex Neurological Centre, Southampton, October 2005 - January 2013). RESULTS: During the specified time periods, carmustine wafers were inserted in 181 operations in 177 patients. We identified acute operative site haematomas after carmustine wafer insertion in 8 (4.4%) patients. All presented in a delayed fashion on or after Day 2 post-operatively. In contrast, acute operative site haematoma was present in 4/491 (0.81%) of patients who underwent resection without gliadel wafer insertion. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the expected timing of bleeding following intracranial tumour resection, all carmustine wafer patients who experienced haemorrhage presented in a delayed fashion on or after Day 2 post-operatively. The causative factors for universally delayed post-operative haematoma after carmustine wafer insertion are unclear and further studies are required to characterize this phenomenon.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Carmustina/efeitos adversos , Glioblastoma/cirurgia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administração & dosagem , Carmustina/administração & dosagem , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reino UnidoRESUMO
Objective: To evaluate the effect of ventricular opening (VO) on recurrence patterns in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) treated with bis-chloroethyl-nitrosourea (BCNU) wafer implantation. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 40 patients with newly diagnosed GBM who received BCNU wafer implantation after tumor resection between March 2013 and February 2022. The patients were categorized into two groups based on whether VO occurred during the GBM resection. While 18 patients had VO, 22 did not have VO. In cases with VO, the ventricular wall defect is closed with gelatin or oxidized regenerated cellulose and fibrin glue before BCNU wafer implantation. Recurrence patterns-classified as local, diffuse, distant, or multifocal-and time to recurrence were compared between patients with and without VO. Results: The median follow-up period for the entire cohort was 32.2 months (interquartile range, 16.7-38 months). Median survival time was comparable between patients with VO and patients without VO (38 vs. 26 months, p=0.53). Recurrence occurred in 31/40 patients (77.5%) in entire cohort. The incidence of recurrence was comparable between patients with VO and patients without VO (14 [77.8%] vs. 17 [77.3%], p=1.0). No significant differences were seen between the two groups in time to recurrence (p=0.59) or recurrence patterns (p=0.35). Conclusion: Ventricular opening during surgery with BCNU wafer implantation does not seem to influence the recurrence patterns. Ventricular opening does not induce distant recurrence if appropriate ventricular closure is performed.
RESUMO
Gliadel wafer implants (Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA) have shown their efficacy in prolonging survival in patients with malignant gliomas. The safety of Gliadel wafers has also been reported; however, there is a certain risk of adverse events. We present a rare case of refractory cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage with eosinophilic meningitis in a patient with glioblastoma who underwent tumor resection with Gliadel wafer implants. A 60-year-old man presented with a glioblastoma in the right temporal lobe. The patient underwent tumor resection with Gliadel wafer implants. During the postoperative course, the patient presented with intractable CSF leakage and the development of a pseudomeningocele. A delayed rise in blood and CSF eosinophil count (a few weeks after the primary operation) and positive drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST) results against the Gliadel wafer led to the diagnosis of an allergic reaction to these implants. Removal of the Gliadel wafers resolved the eosinophilic reaction; however, the patient subsequently required a shunt procedure for persistent hydrocephalus. This case highlights the importance of investigating rare causes of refractory CSF leakage and hydrocephalus due to allergic reactions to Gliadel wafers. Delayed elevations of eosinophils in blood and CSF tests may lead to a diagnosis of eosinophilic meningitis. DLST against Gliadel wafers is also useful for diagnosis when it is available. To control the hydrocephalus, not only the shunt procedure but also wafer removal must be considered; however, patients with limited life expectancy are generally hesitant to undergo such additional procedures.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety profile of bis-chloroethyl-nitrosourea (BCNU) wafer implantation after malignant glioma resection with or without ventricular opening (VO). METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 66 consecutive patients with BCNU wafer implantation after malignant glioma resection between March 2013 and August 2021. The patients were categorized into 2 groups based on whether VO occurred during the malignant glioma resection. Fifty-eight patients had glioblastoma, and 8 had anaplastic astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma. Forty-eight patients underwent an initial treatment, and 18 underwent recurrent surgeries. Infection, hydrocephalus, subcutaneous fluid collection, chronic subdural hematoma, early seizure after surgery within 1 month, symptomatic edema surrounding the resected cavity, cyst formation, and postoperative hemorrhage were defined as adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Thirty-three patients underwent resection with VO, and 33 without. The median survival time was 28 months in the initial treatment group and 11.5 months in the recurrent treatment group. The with and without VO groups had similar median survival times. Postoperative AEs occurred in 7/33 patients (21.2%) with VO and 10/33 (30.3%) without VO, with no difference between them (P = 0.574). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that VO during surgery with BCNU wafer implantation might not influence the occurrence of postoperative AEs. If VO happens, BCNU wafer implantation can be performed safely with accurate closing of the ventricle.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioma , Humanos , Carmustina/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapêutico , Glioma/cirurgia , Terapia CombinadaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adjuvant treatment with Gliadel wafers may prolong overall survival (OS) for malignant glioma patients without increasing toxicity. In Japan, the long-term OS of these patients treated with Gliadel 7.7 mg implants has not been studied. We evaluated OS and prognostic factors that might affect OS in Japanese patients with malignant glioma who received the Gliadel 7.7 mg implant. METHODS: This observational, long-term, postmarketing surveillance was an extension of a previous surveillance. Data were collected through case report forms at 2 and 3 years after Gliadel implant. Up to 8 Gliadel wafers (61.6 mg of carmustine) were placed over the tumor resection site. Primary endpoints were OS and prognostic factors that may influence OS. RESULTS: Among the 506 patients analyzed, 62.6% had newly diagnosed disease, and 37.4% had recurrent disease; 79.1% had glioblastoma histological type and 79.6% had World Health Organization Grade IV disease. Patients received a median of 8 wafers. The median OS was 18.0 months; OS rates were 39.8% and 31.5% at 2 and 3 years, respectively. Ageâ ≥65 years (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.456; Pâ =â .002), lower resection rate (HR: 1.206; Pâ <â .001), recurrence (HR: 2.418; Pâ <â .001), and concomitant radiotherapy (HR: 0.588; Pâ <â .001) were identified as significant prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the 2- and 3-year OS of Japanese malignant glioma patients with varied backgrounds after Gliadel implant. With a careful interpretation of indirect comparisons with previously reported data, the results suggest that prognosis could be improved with Gliadel implants. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02300506.
RESUMO
To cure the illness in the brain glioblastoma, the Gliadel wafer, as the first FDA-approved chemotherapy, was available on the market since 1997. Due to the complex studies in vivo, more and more researchers have paid their attention to investigate the dynamic process in the brain by numerical methods. This study aimed to simulate the drug concentration in the cavity after drug releases from Gliadel wafers into the brain tumor by a two-dimensional simulation. The government equations, the parameters, and corresponding initial and boundary conditions are specified. Then the models are discretized and solved by finite element method (FEM) and finite difference method (FDM) based on C++ library Adaptive Finite Element Package (AFEPack) and MATLAB, respectively. First of all, the numerical convergence of the method is studied by numerical results represented in several successively refined meshes, which shows the reliability of our method. In the results from FEM, a steady state of the pressure in the normal tissue can be simulated. As for FDM, the changes of drug concentration are displayed at six different times. The numerical method in this paper is an effective tool for the numerical study on drug release from polymers. Additionally, convection is a critical factor in drug transportation. Moreover, the simulation approach can be used as the guild for remedy optimization and dynamic analysis of other drugs (paclitaxel) for tumor treatment in the clinic. This mathematical model has wide applications about drug release in multiple dosage forms, such as long sustained release microspheres, oral extended release hydrophilic matrix tablets, hydrogel, and sustained release topical rings.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioblastoma , Encéfalo/patologia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Carmustina/uso terapêutico , Preparações de Ação Retardada/uso terapêutico , Glioblastoma/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
Clinical trial data of Carmustine implant (Gliadel Wafer) in Japanese patients with malignant glioma are limited; thus, we conducted a postmarketing surveillance study to evaluate the safety of Gliadel in real-world clinical practice in Japan. In this postmarketing surveillance study, all patients who received Gliadel placement for malignant glioma surgeries from its market launch (January 9, 2013) to July 10, 2013 were enrolled from 229 institutions using a central registration system. Up to eight wafers of Gliadel (containing 61.6 mg of carmustine) were used to cover the site of brain tumor resection intraoperatively according to the size and shape of the tumor resection cavity. The observation period lasted 3 months after Gliadel placement. Patients were followed up for 1 year postoperatively. Safety was assessed by the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In total, 558 patients were included. Most patients (66.7%) received eight Gliadel wafers. The percentage of patients with ADRs was 35.7% (365 ADR episodes in 199 patients). Of the AEs of special interest, the most common were cerebral edema (22.2%, 124/558 patients), convulsion (9.9%, 55/558 patients), impaired healing (4.8%, 27/558 patients), and infection (3.4%, 19/558 patients). This first all-case postmarketing surveillance report of the safety of Gliadel in real-world clinical practice in Japan suggests that the risk of toxicity with Gliadel placement is relatively tolerable. The survival benefits of Gliadel placement should be evaluated and considered carefully by the clinician taking into account possible toxicities.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioma , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Carmustina/efeitos adversos , Ácidos Decanoicos , Glioma/tratamento farmacológico , Glioma/cirurgia , Humanos , Japão , Poliésteres , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Glioblastoma is one of the most aggressive brain tumors and is associated with a very low overall median survival despite the current treatment. The standard of care used in clinic is the Stupp's protocol which consists of a maximal resection of the tumor when possible, followed by radio and chemotherapy using temozolomide. However, in most cases, glioblastoma cells infiltrate healthy tissues and lead to fatal recurrences. There are a lot of hurdles to overcome in the development of new therapeutic strategies such as tumor heterogeneity, cell infiltration, alkylating agent resistance, physiological barriers, etc., and few treatments are on the market today. One of them is particularly appealing because it is a local therapy, which does not bring additional invasiveness since tumor resection is included in the gold standard treatment. They are implants: the Gliadel® wafers, which are deposited post-surgery. Nevertheless, in addition to presenting important undesirable effects, it does not bring any major benefit in the therapy despite the strategy being particularly attractive. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of recent advances in the development of innovative therapeutic strategies for glioblastoma using an implant-type approach. The combination of this local strategy with effective targeting of the tumor microenvironment as a whole, also developed in this review, may be of interest to alleviate some of the obstacles encountered in the treatment of glioblastoma.
RESUMO
1,3-Bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU, or Carmustine) wafers are intraoperatively implantable wafers used to achieve local tumor control. There is scarce data about the behavior of wafers in the long-term follow-up of implanted cases. We reviewed the data of 64 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated by surgery, BCNU wafers, radiation therapy, and temozolomide administration. This cohort included 55 patients who presented first recurrence, and 49 of them showed tumor progression to death. The MR imaging of each patient at the terminal stage and an autopsy case were used to elucidate the tumor progression pattern after the wafer implantation. We subdivided the first recurrence pattern into local, distant, and multifocal based on MR imaging or into infield, outfield, and marginal based on the radiation field. The first recurrence pattern was 33 patients (60%) with local, 13 (24%) with distant, and nine (16%) with multifocal recurrence, or 38 patients (69%) with infield, 13 (24%) with outfield, and four (7%) with marginal. The median and mean time intervals between MR imaging at the terminal stage and death were 2.0 and 2.3 months, respectively. Of note, 13 patients with first distant recurrence had no obvious radiological local tumor progression even at the terminal stage. Long-term follow-up after BCNU wafer implantation revealed that patients with first distant recurrence had long-lasting local tumor control until the terminal stage.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Carmustina/administração & dosagem , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Glioblastoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Glioblastoma/cirurgia , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagem , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
High grade gliomas are associated with poor prognosis and high mortality. Conventional treatments and management of high grade gliomas have shown little improvement in 5-year overall survival. This phase I trial evaluated the safety, immunogenicity, and potential synergy of surgical resection with Gliadel Wafer implantation, followed by autologous tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cell (DC) vaccine in patients with malignant glioma. Primary end points of this study were safety and surrogate markers of immunogenicity, overall survival, and progression free survival. Following surgical resection, Gliadel Wafers were placed along the resection cavity. Patients subsequently received intradermal injections of autologous tumor lysate-pulsed DC vaccines 3 times at 2 week intervals. Treatment response was evaluated clinically and through MRI at regular intervals. Twenty-eight patients received Gliadel Wafers and DC vaccination: 11 newly diagnosed (8 glioblastoma [GBM], 2 anaplastic astrocytoma [AA], and 1 anaplastic oligodendroglioma [AO]) and 17 recurrent (15 GBMs, 1 AA, and 1 AO) high grade gliomas. Immunogenicity data was collected for 20 of the 28 patients. Five of 20 patients showed elevated IFN-γ responses following vaccination. Median progression-free survival and overall survival for all GBM patients in the trial from the start of vaccination were 3.6 months and 16.9 months respectively. Comparisons between vaccine responders and non-vaccine responders were not statistically significant. Adjuvant autologous dendritic cells pulsed with tumor-lysate following resection and Gliadel Wafer placement is safe, elicits modest immunogenicity and shows similar clinical outcomes in patients who had DC vaccination in previous studies.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Vacinas Anticâncer/uso terapêutico , Carmustina/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Decanoicos/uso terapêutico , Células Dendríticas/transplante , Glioma/terapia , Poliésteres/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Antígenos de Neoplasias/imunologia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vacinação/métodosRESUMO
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) has few clinically approved therapeutic regimens. One of these therapeutic options includes placing biodegradable wafers releasing BCNU (Gliadel®) into the tumor bed at the time of surgical removal of the tumor. Due to the significant benefit this polymer technology has had clinically, we have prepared wafers releasing Temozolomide (TMZ), an anticancer drug used systemically for treating GBM. TMZ delivered via polymer wafer could be used as a complementary treatment with or as an alternative to Gliadel®. TMZ is an alkylating agent which is water soluble. To remain comparable with the preclinical studies that led to Gliadel® the same size of wafers were formulated with TMZ. Wafers were loaded with 50% w/w TMZ in poly(lactic acid-glycolic acid) (PLGA) and showed reliable release of high dose TMZ for a period of 4â¯weeks. To achieve this 30-day release of the highly water soluble drug, we developed an encapsulation method, where the drug powder was first coated with the polymer to form core-shell particles in which the coating shell served as a rate controlling membrane for the drug particles. Wafers were also made with a co-loading of TMZ and BCNU. All wafers were tested in vivo by treating an intracranial 9â¯L gliosarcoma model in F344 rats. Rats that were either untreated or treated with blank wafer died within 11â¯days while the median survival for rats treated with systemic TMZ was 18â¯days. The group that received the BCNU alone wafer had a median survival of 15â¯days, the group that received the TMZ wafer alone had a median survival of 19â¯days, and the group treated with the BCNU-TMZ wafer had a median survival of 28â¯days with 25% of the animals living long term (pâ¯<â¯.0038 vs. Control; pâ¯<â¯.001 vs. Blank Polymer). These findings demonstrate the potential of this newly designed wafer for treating GBM. Moreover, this concept, can pave the way for other drug combinations that may improve the clinical application of numerous agents to treat solid tumors.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Carmustina/administração & dosagem , Ácidos Decanoicos/administração & dosagem , Preparações de Ação Retardada/química , Glioblastoma/tratamento farmacológico , Poliésteres/administração & dosagem , Temozolomida/administração & dosagem , Animais , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carmustina/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Decanoicos/uso terapêutico , Implantes de Medicamento/química , Feminino , Poliésteres/uso terapêutico , Copolímero de Ácido Poliláctico e Ácido Poliglicólico/química , Ratos Endogâmicos F344 , Temozolomida/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Randomized, controlled trials have shown significant improvement of survival after implantation of 1,3-bis(2-Chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) wafers for patients suffering from high-grade glioma. A combination of local chemotherapy with BCNU and concomitant radiochemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ) appears to be attractive to enhance the overall survival, even though these treatments may potentially cumulate their toxicity. We report a clinical case of a patient submitted to this combined treatment protocol. Severe brain edema and a cystic formation in the surgical cavity rapidly developed. Data supporting the use of Gliadel® combined with TMZ comes from small retrospective studies, and some series have shown a very high rate of adverse events (AEs) when this multimodality treatment is applied. Combined protocols of local and systemic chemotherapy might provide survival benefits, although AEs seem currently underestimated.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Implantation of carmustine wafers (Gliadel) in vivo is accompanied by characteristic serial changes on MRI and CT, such as transient hyperintensity of the wafers on T1-weighted images (T1WIs) and considerable gas accumulation in surgical resection cavities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate intrinsic imaging changes to carmustine wafers in vitro. METHODS: Three phantoms simulating a surgical resection cavity were constructed. Each contained either a carmustine wafer fixed with oxidized regenerated cellulose and fibrin sealant, an unfixed carmustine wafer, or a fixed polyethylene control disk, immersed in phosphate-buffered saline. Image acquisition of the phantoms was performed on MRI and CT until 182 days after construction. The radiological appearances of the object in each phantom were assessed by visual evaluation and quantification of the region of interest. The volume of gas around the objects at 24 h after constructing the phantoms was also measured. RESULTS: The carmustine wafers showed low signal intensities on T1WIs and T2-weighted images (T2WIs), and high densities on CT images at 24 h. The signal intensities and CT densities gradually approximated those of saline over a period of months. However, the carmustine wafers never showed hyperintensity on T1WIs in vitro. The fixed carmustine wafer showed slower radiological changes, as compared to the unfixed wafer. The gas volume around the fixed carmustine wafer was greater than that around the fixed control disk. CONCLUSION: Changes to the carmustine wafers probably reflected penetration of fluid inside and degradation of the hydrophobic matrix. Reported transient hyperintensity of wafers on T1WIs in vivo is regarded as the result of biological reactions, whereas the initial production of gas is considered as an intrinsic characteristic of wafers.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patologia , Carmustina/uso terapêutico , Glioblastoma/tratamento farmacológico , Glioblastoma/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although a subdural fluid collection frequently is observed, diagnostic methods that differentiate between the subdural collection caused by external hydrocephalus and that caused by subdural hygroma have not been established. Here, we report a case of external hydrocephalus caused by Gliadel-induced eosinophilic meningitis that has been previously reported in only 1 case and can be diagnosed by time-spatial labeling inversion pulse magnetic resonance imaging (time-SLIP MRI). CASE DESCRIPTION: A tumor located in the left temporal was detected incidentally in an 81-year-old man by examination of a head injury. The tumor was surgically resected and diagnosed as a high-grade glioma during the surgery; Gliadel wafers subsequently were implanted. Three weeks after the resection, the patient showed disturbed consciousness, and computed tomography revealed a subdural fluid collection. The out-flow of cerebrospinal through the resection cavity was detected by time-SLIP MRI. Cerebrospinal tests indicated high white blood cell counts and high protein levels, with more than 90% of the white blood cell count comprising eosinophils. Therefore, we suspected that the subdural fluid collection was caused by external hydrocephalus because of Gliadel-induced eosinophilic meningitis. We surgically removed the Gliadel wafers and subsequently performed a surgery to insert a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Histologic examination indicated eosinophilic accumulation around the Gliadel wafers. The patient's symptoms improved after the insertion of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. CONCLUSIONS: In the present case, time-SLIP MRI was a useful and noninvasive method for diagnosing external hydrocephalus which was caused by eosinophilic meningitis because of Gliadel-induced eosinophilic meningitis.