Comparison between arthroscopic suture anchor fixation and open plate fixation in the greater tuberosity fracture of the proximal humerus.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation (OR/IF) using a plate or patients undergoing an arthroscopic suture anchor fixation for the greater tuberosity (GT) fracture of the proximal humerus. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing OR/IF or an arthroscopic suture anchor fixation for the GT fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January, 2010 and December, 2020, 122 patients with GT fracture underwent operative fixation. Either OR/IF using proximal humeral locking plate (50 patients) or arthroscopic suture anchor (72 patients) fixation was performed. Fourteen patients were lost to follow-up and finally, 108 patients were enrolled in this study. We divided these patients into two groups: (1) OR/IF group (Group I: 44 patients) and arthroscopic anchor fixation group (Group II: 64 patients). The primary outcome was subjective shoulder function (shoulder functional scale). Secondary outcomes were range of motion, and complications including GT fixation failure, fracture migration, or neurologic complication. Also, age, sex, BMI, operation time, shoulder dislocation, fracture comminution, AP (anteroposterior), SI (superoinferior) size and displacement were evaluated and compared between two groups. RESULTS: Both groups showed satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes at mid-term follow-up. Between 2 groups, there were no significant differences in age, sex, BMI, presence of shoulder dislocation or comminution. Group II showed higher clinical scores except VAS score (p < 0.05) and longer surgical times (95.3 vs. 61.5 min). Largest fracture displacement (Group I vs. II: SI displacement: 40 vs. 13 mm, and AP displacement: 49 vs. 11 mm) and higher complication rate (p = 0.049) was found in Group I. CONCLUSIONS: Both arthroscopic anchor fixation and open plate fixation methods showed satisfactory outcomes at mid-term follow-up. Among them, OR/IF is preferred for larger fracture displacement (> 5 mm) and shorter operation time However, arthroscopic anchor fixation group showed better clinical outcomes and less complications than the OR/IF group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4, Case series with subgroup analysis.

Fact or fiction: the "5 mm Rule" in greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were 1) to assess the outcome of nonoperative management of GT fractures with > 5 mm of displacement and 2) to assess whether there is a correlation between degree of displacement and outcome. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of consecutive low-energy GT fractures from 2011 to 2020. Radiographs from all visits were reviewed. The direction of maximal displacement was assessed. Subjects were stratified based on the amount of maximal displacement: Group 1: 0-5 mm, Group 2: 5-10 mm, Group 3: > 10 mm. Range of motion (ROM) at the time of final follow-up was assessed. The presence of persistent shoulder pain after healing was noted, as well as whether supplemental subacromial corticosteroid injection was provided as part of long-term treatment. RESULTS: A cohort of 93 fractures comprised the study group. Mean age was 62 years. Mean follow-up was 20 months. All fractures went on to union. Mean displacement was 6.2 mm. There were 43 patients in Group 1, 43 in Group 2, and 7 in Group 3. Maximal displacement was most commonly inferolateral or lateral, accounting for a combined 77% of all patients. There was no difference in final ROM between displacement groups, with at least 155 degrees of forward elevation and 45 degrees of ER in all three groups. There was no difference between Group 1 and Groups 2/3 in frequency of persistent pain or likelihood of receiving a steroid injection. CONCLUSION: Our findings do not support a discrete 5 mm displacement threshold for surgical repair of isolated greater tuberosity fractures.

Biomechanical comparisons of hook plate and screw fixations in split-type greater tuberosity fractures of the humerus.

BACKGROUND: Screws and plate are commonly utilized for the fixation of split-type humeral greater tuberosity (GT) fractures. However, the mechanical properties of these 2 types of fixation methods have not been compared directly. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the classic 2 screws fixation with hook locking plate from a mechanical perspective. METHODS: Sixteen synthetic humerii (Sawbones Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA, USA) were divided into 2 groups. An osteotomy was performed to simulate a split-type GT fracture. Group A (n = 8) was fixed with 2 standard parallel screws. Group B (n = 8) was fixed with a hook plate. Each specimen was tested with traction force at 45° shoulder abduction. Following the 20-N preload, a 500-cycle loading test was applied with a force ranging from 20 to 200 N (valley/peak), and the interfragmental displacement was measured periodically at intervals of 100 cycles. Finally, all the specimens were pulled with destructive force at a rate of 5 mm/min until catastrophic failure. RESULTS: The hook plate exhibited greater construct stiffness than the screw fixation (63.2 ± 6.1 N/mm vs. 40.9 ± 3.4 N/mm, P < .001). All of the specimens completed the entire cyclic loading test without catastrophic failure, and the fragment displacement after 500 cycles was 0.4 ± 0.2 mm for the hook plate and 2.1 ± 0.3 mm for screw fixation, which was statistically lower in the plate group (P < .001). In terms of failure load, the hook plate group exhibited a significantly greater value than the screw group (770.6 ± 94.6 vs. 427.5 ± 45.1 N/mm, P < .001). The failure modes of both fixation methods were distinct. CONCLUSION: In humeral GT fracture fixation, hook plate fixation appears to offer greater construct stiffness and failure load while maintaining fragment stability to resist a physiological traction force. The current study provides support from a mechanical perspective for the clinical application of the hook plate.

Augmented cerclage wire improves the fixation strength of a two-screw construct for humerus split type greater tuberosity fracture: a biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND: Poor functional outcome can result from humeral greater tuberosity (GT) fracture if not treated appropriately. A two-screw construct is commonly used for the surgical treatment of such injury. However, loss of reduction is still a major concern after surgery. To improve the biomechanical strength of screw fixation in GT fractures, we made a simple modification of the two-screw construct by adding a cerclage wire to the two-screw construct. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to analyze the effect of this modification for the fixation of GT fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders were used in this study. The fracture models were arbitrarily assigned to one of two fixation methods. Group A (n = 8) was fixed with two threaded cancellous screws with washers. In group B (n = 8), all screws were set using methods identical to group A, with the addition of a cerclage wire. Horizontal traction was applied via a stainless steel cable fixed directly to the myotendinous junction of the supraspinatus muscle. Displacement of the fracture fixation under a pulling force of 100 N/200 N and loading force to construct failure were measured. RESULTS: The mean displacements under 100 N and 200 N traction force were both significantly decreased in group B than in group A. (100 N: 1.06 ± 0.12 mm vs. 2.26 ± 0.24 mm, p < 0.001; 200 N: 2.21 ± 0.25 mm vs. 4.94 ± 0.30 mm, p < 0.001) Moreover, the failure load was significantly higher in group B compared with group A. (415 ± 52 N vs.335 ± 47 N, p = 0.01), CONCLUSIONS: The current biomechanical cadaveric study demonstrated that the two-screw fixation construct augmented with a cerclage wire has higher mechanical performance than the conventional two-screw configuration for the fixation of humeral GT fractures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered.

A new low-profile anatomic locking plate for fixation of comminuted, displaced greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus.

BACKGROUND: Although various implants exist for the fixation of isolated greater tuberosity fractures, few implants are specifically designed for such fractures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiologic outcomes of open reduction-internal fixation with a low-profile anatomic locking plate for comminuted greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus. METHODS: From November 2012 to February 2018, 24 patients with displaced and comminuted isolated greater tuberosity fractures were treated with the new low-profile anatomic locking plate. To determine clinical outcomes, we evaluated active range of motion; the visual analog scale pain score; the Constant-Murley score; the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; radiographs; and complications. RESULTS: In all cases, a mean follow-up period of 29.3 months (range, 18-48 months) was completed. All patients achieved bone union with a mean healing time of 11.3 weeks (range, 8-16 weeks). The mean Constant-Murley score was 91.1 points (range, 69-100 points), with a rate of good to excellent results of 95.8%. The average Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 9.9 points (range, 2-25 points), and the mean visual analog scale pain score was 1.1 points (range, 0-4 points). Mean active forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation (level) were 157°, 152°, and 40°, and T11, respectively. Postoperatively, 1 patient had persistent shoulder stiffness, and 1 patient had recurrence of shoulder dislocation because of a falling injury during badminton. No serious complications such as subacromial impingement, malunion, nonunion, loss of reduction, or implant failure occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The new low-profile anatomic locking plate was useful for the treatment of comminuted isolated greater tuberosity fractures as it provided reliable stability and satisfactory radiographic and functional results. The described technique is a simple and effective method and provides a new reliable option for the treatment of isolated greater tuberosity fractures.

Risk factors for failure of reduction of anterior glenohumeral dislocation without sedation.

BACKGROUND: Although anterior glenohumeral dislocations are common, the reduction procedure is often difficult, requiring sedation or anesthesia. To date, the risk factors for reduction failure without sedation have not been fully investigated. This study aimed to clarify the predictive factors that render the reduction of anterior glenohumeral dislocation without sedation difficult by use of multivariate analyses. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 156 patients who underwent attempted reduction of anterior glenohumeral dislocation between 2006 and 2019. Patients were included based on the following criteria: traumatic dislocation, undergoing attempted reduction using the traction-countertraction method, and acute dislocation in which reduction was attempted within 2 days of the injury. The dependent variable was set as an irreducible glenohumeral dislocation without sedation, which was defined as a reduction failure in this study. Explanatory variables included age, sex, side of injury, recurrent dislocation, axillary nerve injury, time from dislocation to attempted reduction, greater tuberosity fracture, humeral neck fracture, glenoid rim fracture, and glenohumeral osteoarthritis. We evaluated these outcomes from radiographs and clinical notes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Baseline variables, which were observed to be significant in the univariate analysis, were included in multivariate models, which used logistic regression to identify independent predictors of reduction failure. RESULTS: Of the 156 patients, 25 (16.0%) experienced reduction failure. Multivariate analyses showed that older age (≥55 years) (odds ratio [OR], 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-10.4; P = .036), greater tuberosity fractures (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.1-12.2; P = .033), and glenoid rim fractures (OR, 11.5; 95% CI, 1.5-87.7; P = .018) were risk factors for reduction failure. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that multiple factors were associated with unsuccessful reduction of anterior glenohumeral dislocation without sedation. In elderly patients or patients with concurrent greater tuberosity fractures and glenoid rim fractures, reduction failure could occur in the absence of sedation; thus, the administration of sedatives or anesthesia should be considered.

The incidence of occult and missed surgical neck fractures in patients with isolated greater tuberosity fracture of the proximal humerus.

BACKGROUND: Occult and missed surgical neck fractures can be found in patients diagnosed with isolated greater tuberosity (GT) fracture during the follow up period. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the incidence rate of occult and missed surgical neck fractures in those initially diagnosed with isolated GT fracture. METHODS: Records of patients diagnosed as having an isolated GT fracture were retrieved from a database in a medical center. Two senior orthopedic surgeons blindly reviewed all images of these patients three times to classify GT fracture types (split, avulsion and depression types), and recorded any surgical neck fractures found. Then a meeting was help to confirm the fracture types and presence of surgical neck fracture. RESULTS: Occult surgical neck fractures were found in 5 out of 68 (7.4%) patients, whereas missed surgical neck fractures were found in 3 out of 68 (4.4%) patients. In total, 32 patients had split type GT fracture, 32 had avulsion type and 4 had depression type. For those with occult surgical neck fractures, 7 had the split type GT fracture, while the remaining one had the avulsion type. Although the proportion of occult surgical neck fracture was higher in the split-type GT fracture (21.9%) than in the avulsion-type GT fracture (3.1%), the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.056). CONCLUSION: Occult humeral surgical neck fractures occurred in 7.4% of isolated greater tuberosity fractures after re-evaluation, while missed humeral surgical neck fractures occurred in 4.4%.

Different suture anchor fixation techniques affect contact properties in humeral greater tuberosity fracture: a biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND: Suture anchor-based fixations of humeral greater tuberosity (GT) fractures have yielded good outcomes in both clinical and biomechanical studies. Be that as it may, the interface contact properties of these fixations have yet to be elaborated. In response, the contact characteristics of two double-row suture anchor fixations for the management of GT fracture were compared. METHODS: Two suture anchor-based fixation techniques, namely the Double-Row Suture Anchor Fixation (DR) and Suture-Bridge Technique (SB), were used to repair humeral GT fractures in 12 fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders. A Tekscan pressure sensor placed between the repaired tuberosity and humerus recorded continuous data points directly after repair and for 60 min at set time intervals. The constructs were then cyclically loaded until 100 N, and the shoulders tested at 0°, 30°, and 60° of abduction. Under an applied force, the contact pressure and contact area of the interface were determined. RESULTS: Although both fixation configurations showed decreased contact pressure and area over time, the SB group had higher contact pressure right after fixation and at all time points thereafter. In contrast, the DR group demonstrated significantly more contact pressure and area at each abduction position with the applied load. Nevertheless, contact pressure and area decreased in response to increasing abduction position for both fixation constructs. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that despite the SB construct having superior interface contact immediately after fixation, the DR construct offered better contact performance at all abduction angles with applied force. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Science, Biomechanics.

Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive open reduction and internal fixation by screw and washer for displaced greater tuberosity fracture of the humerus.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical and radiologic outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation with a screw and washer for a displaced greater tuberosity fracture of the proximal humerus through a small incision. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 29 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation with a screw and washer for a greater tuberosity fracture of the proximal humerus. After surgery, the patients were immobilized in a brace for 4 weeks. To determine clinical outcomes, we evaluated a visual analog scale pain score; the Subjective Shoulder Value; the University of California, Los Angeles shoulder score; the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score; and active range of motion. RESULTS: All patients achieved bone union within 3 months after surgery. At the 2-year follow-up, the mean visual analog scale pain score was 1.1 ± 1.1; Subjective Shoulder Value, 93.4 ± 5.3; University of California, Los Angeles shoulder score, 31.2 ± 2.7; and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, 92.6 ± 6.7. Mean active forward flexion, external rotation, and internal rotation were 144° ± 16°, 33° ± 11°, and 13.3 ± 1.7, respectively. Postoperatively, 9 patients (31%) had stiffness and pain refractory to conservative treatment and underwent arthroscopic release. CONCLUSION: Although minimal open reduction and screw and washer fixation resulted in bone union in all cases, the incidence of postoperative stiffness was relatively high in patients with displaced greater tuberosity fractures because of prolonged immobilization after surgery.

Isolated greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus: anatomy, injury patterns, multimodality imaging, and approach to management.

The greater tuberosity is an important anatomic structure and its integrity is important for shoulder abduction and external rotation. Isolated fractures of the greater tuberosity are often subtle and may not be detected on initial radiographs. Clinically, these patients display symptoms which mimic a full thickness rotator cuff tear. It is important to differentiate these two entities, as their treatment is different (typically nonsurgical management for minimally displaced fractures versus rotator cuff repair for acute full thickness rotator cuff tears). When greater tuberosity fractures are significantly displaced and allowed to heal without anatomic reduction, they can lead to impingement. This article will review greater tuberosity anatomy and function, as well as the clinical presentation and multimodality imaging findings of greater tuberosity fractures. Imaging optimization, pitfalls, and clinical management of these fractures will also be discussed.

Titanium mini locking plate with trans-osseous sutures for the treatment of humeral greater tuberosity fracture osteosynthesis versus PHILOS: a retrospective view.

PURPOSE: Greater tuberosity fractures (GTFs) account for 17 to 21% of proximal humerus fractures, most of these fractures are treated conservatively, but treatment for displaced fractures is still controversial. The aim of this study is to compare intra-operative clinical conditions and post-operative outcomes when displaced GTFs are treated with either proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) or mini locking plate with trans-osseous sutures. METHODS: This is a retrospective study conducted in Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital. A total of 60 patients (22 males and 38 females) with displaced humeral GTF between May 2013 and March 2017 were included, of whom 43 underwent PHILOS implant treatment and 17 underwent titanium mini plate implant with trans-osseous suture treatment. Intra-operative (incision size, intra-operative blood loss, operative duration) and postoperative (Constant-Murley score (CMS) and implant cost) variables were recorded for the comparison. RESULTS: Mini locking plate with trans-osseous sutures shows better results. Operative duration (PHILOS mean 77.0 minutes vs mean 63.7 minutes, p value < 0.05), blood loss during surgery (PHILOS mean 111.5 vs 66.5 ml, p value < 0.05), incision size (PHILOS mean 7.2 vs 4.6 cm, p value < 0.05), CMS (PHILOS mean 81.0 vs 87.3, p value < 0.05), and implant costs (PHILOS mean 26,192.6 renminbi (RMB) vs mean 21,358.8 RMB, p value < 0.05). On the other hand, 9.30% of impingement in the PHILOS group was observed to have no complications compared to the mini locking plate group. CONCLUSIONS: Mini locking plate with trans-osseous sutures shows better efficacy in reducing the incision size, operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, and implant cost and in improving CMS. No complication was found with its use. Our data can provide rationale and inform sample- size calculations for such studies. Larger, control studies are needed for better understanding.

Single versus double row suture anchor fixation for greater tuberosity fractures - a biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the humeral greater tuberosity (GT) are a frequent injury progressively treated with arthroscopic suture anchor repair. Yet, no biomechanical study has been performed comparing fixation strength of arthroscopic single- (SR) vs. double row (DR) fixation. METHODS: Standardized fractures of the greater tuberosity were created in 12 fresh frozen proximal humeri. After random assignation to the SR or DR group the fixed humeri were tested applying cyclic loading to the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon. Load to failure and fragment displacement were assessed by means of an electrodynamic material testing machine using an optical tracking system. RESULTS: Load to failure values were higher in the DR group (649 N; ±176) than in the SR group (490 N; ±145) however without statistical significance (p = .12). In greater tuberosity displacement of 3-5 mm surgical treatment is recommended. The fixing constructs in this study did not reach displacement landmarks of 3 or 5 mm before construct failure as shown in previous studies. Thus the applied traction force (N) at 1 mm displacement was analyzed. In the SR group the load at 1 mm displacement was 277 N; ±46 compared to 260 N; ±62 in the DR group (p = .65). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that both techniques are viable options for refixation of greater tuberosity fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Laboratory study.

The "triple dislocation fracture": anterior shoulder dislocation with concomitant fracture of the glenoid rim, greater tuberosity and coracoid process-a series of six cases.

BACKGROUND: A combined fracture of the glenoid rim, greater tuberosity, and coracoid process after anterior shoulder dislocation is a rare event. Only 1 patient has been reported in the literature. METHODS: All patients with a first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in a level A trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. Among the 2068 patients treated between 1998 and 2013, we identified 6 patients (0.3%; 1 female, 5 male) with "triple dislocation fracture" (anterior shoulder dislocation with concomitant fracture of the glenoid rim, greater tuberosity, and coracoid process). All patients underwent surgery and had computed tomography scans before surgery and the first postoperative day. Mean follow-up time was 59 months. Clinical and radiographic evaluation, Constant-Murley Score, Simple Shoulder Test, and Subjective Shoulder Value were performed at the final follow-up. RESULTS: Surgery was determined individually according to the radiologic findings, patient's age, and personal demands. Glenoid reconstruction was performed in all 6 patients, greater tuberosity refixation in 4 patients, and coracoid process refixation in 3. Two patients needed revision surgery due to loss of reduction. At the final follow-up, mean abduction was 133°, mean anterior flexion was 138°; the mean Constant-Murley Score was 72 points; the mean Simple Shoulder Test was 9 points; and the mean Subjective Shoulder Value was 72%. No recurrent instability occurred. CONCLUSIONS: A "triple dislocation fracture," especially coracoid process fractures, can easily be overlooked in radiographs. Computed tomography scans are strongly recommended in patients with a first-time traumatic shoulder dislocation. Because recurrent joint instability and secondary arthropathy are serious complications after anterior shoulder dislocation, surgery should be considered and provides satisfying to excellent results.

Clinical and radiologic outcomes of arthroscopic suture bridge repair for the greater tuberosity fractures of the proximal humerus.

PURPOSE: To report the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic suture bridge repair for the GT fractures of the shoulder joint. METHODS: From March 2008 to July 2013, we performed arthroscopic suture bridge repair of the GT fractures displaced more than 5 mm superiorly or posteriorly, but less than 2 cm in 40 cases [20 men, 20 women; mean age, 56 (27-80) years] with the average 32 (24-48) months follow-up. At the final follow-up, clinical (ASES, UCLA, SST, KSS score and range of motions) and radiological outcomes using post-operative MRI or CT scan were evaluated. Associated injuries occurred in 21 cases (52.5%): 8 rotator cuff tears; 7 SLAP lesions; 3 glenoid rim fractures; 3 Bankart lesions; 5 biceps tendon tears; 1 partial subscapularis tear; 1 combined subscapularis and biceps tendon tear, and 1 brachial plexus injury. RESULTS: At the final follow-up, the mean VAS score improved from 7 to 1; ASES, to 92; UCLA, to 32; KSS, to 90; and SST, to 10. Mean forward flexion, abduction, external rotation at the side, and internal rotation at the back were improved to 157°, 157°, 37° and T11, respectively. Mean residual superior and posterior displacement of the fracture was 0 (range -5 to 3.3) mm and 0.1 (-5.5 to 3.2) mm, respectively, compared to pre-operative displacement of 4.9 (0-14) mm and 4.5 (0-20) mm, respectively (p < 0.001). Complications included anchor protrusion in five cases. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic suture bridge repair was useful for the treatment of displaced GT fractures with or without comminution and the management of the combined lesions. At the final follow-up, meaningful remodeling of the GT fracture and satisfactory clinical outcomes could be achieved.

Effect of shoulder abduction on the fixation of humeral greater tuberosity fractures: a biomechanical study for three types of fixation constructs.

BACKGROUND: An abduction brace and abduction exercises are commonly employed after humeral greater tuberosity fracture repair. However, the effects of glenohumeral abduction on the biomechanical strength have seldom been elucidated. METHOD: We studied 24 pairs of female fresh frozen porcine shoulders randomly divided into 3 groups. After creation of a greater tuberosity fracture on each shoulder, 3 fixation techniques were used for the 3 groups: double-row suture anchor fixation (DR), suture bridge technique (SB), and 2-screw fixation (TS). This biomechanical study was conducted to compare the forces that create 3- and 5-mm displacements and the ultimate failure load at the simulated shoulder abduction angles of 0° and 45° among the 3 groups. RESULTS: In the DR group, the mean forces to create 3- and 5-mm displacements and the failure load at 0° were higher than those at 45° (P = .036, P = .012, P = .027). By contrast, in the SB group, the mean forces to create 3- and 5-mm displacements at 45° were greater than those at 0° (P = .012, P = .012). There were no significant differences in the forces to create 3- and 5-mm displacements and construct failure between 0° and 45° in the TS group (P = .575, .327, .478). CONCLUSION: The DR group had greatest initial fixation strength at a low abduction angle, whereas the SB group had the highest initial fixation strength at a high abduction angle. The TS group appeared unaffected by the abduction angle.

Neglected Anterior Shoulder Dislocation With Greater Tuberosity Fracture Managed With Open Reduction and Latarjet Procedure: A Case Report.

Neglected shoulder dislocation is a relatively rare occurrence characterized by structural changes in bone and soft tissue. Surgical intervention is often necessary, yet no universally accepted treatment approach exists, presenting a challenging clinical scenario. A 45-year-old female presented with an eight-month-old neglected anterior shoulder dislocation, compounded by a Hill-Sachs lesion from a previous fall. Treatment comprised open reduction in conjunction with the Latarjet procedure. Regular follow-up evaluations were conducted over three years post-surgery, revealing satisfactory outcomes including good range of motion, bony union, and absence of dislocation episodes. Managing neglected shoulder dislocations, particularly those with significant bone defects, poses unique challenges involving soft tissue contracture, bone loss, and associated fractures. Despite these complexities, open reduction combined with the Latarjet procedure demonstrated a high success rate in preventing further shoulder dislocation, albeit with a persistent risk of shoulder joint osteoarthritis.

Comparison Study Among Three Surgical Methods in the Treatment of Isolated Fractures of the Greater Tuberosity of the Humerus.

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of three methods for isolated greater tuberosity fractures of the humerus. Methods: A retrospective review of patients with isolated humeral greater tuberosity fractures between January 2013 and June 2021 in our institution. We recorded data on patient demographics, injury characteristics, preoperative and postoperative imaging findings, length of incision, operative time, and intraoperative blood loss. Results: A total of 107 patients met the inclusion criteria and were divided into three groups. 50 patients in group A were administered a proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) plate fixed using the deltopectoral approach, 26 patients in group B were administered a PHILOS plate fixed using the deltoid-splitting approach, and 31 patients in group C were administered a novel anatomical plate fixed using the deltoid-splitting approach. No significant differences were identified in sex, age, injury mechanism, type of fracture, dominant side limb, or shoulder anterior joint dislocation. However, the operative time, blood loss, and the length of incision was shorter than in Group C. Moreover, pain was evaluated on the third and fifth days after surgery; pain was lower in Group C, and pain at the last follow-up was not different between the groups. No significant differences were identified in the Constant score, DASH score, and ROM at the last follow-up. 2 patients were diagnosed with subacromial impingement, 1 in Group A one in Group B, and 1 patient in Group B experienced axillary nerve injury after surgery. Conclusion: The novel anatomical plate fixed using the deltoid-splitting approach can achieve good results in the treatment of isolated humeral greater tubercle fractures with less blood loss, shorter operative time, and shorter surgical incisions, and can relieve pain in the early postoperative period.

The Posterior Dislocation of the Shoulder With Reverse Hill-Sachs Lesion and Humerus Lesser and Greater Tuberosity Fracture.

Posterior shoulder dislocations are the rarest of all shoulder dislocations. They are commonly associated with seizures, electric shocks, or trauma. This case report presents a 60-year-old male with a posterior shoulder dislocation complicated by fractures of the greater tuberosity (GT) and lesser tuberosity (LT) and a reverse Hill-Sachs lesion. The patient was treated surgically using a modified McLaughlin procedure. This case highlights the importance of the early recognition and appropriate surgical management of complex posterior shoulder dislocations to prevent recurrent instability and ensure optimal functional recovery.

Anterior shoulder dislocation with avulsion fracture of the greater tuberosity results in reliable good outcomes after closed reduction.

Background: Avulsion of the greater tuberosity (GT) due to traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation (ASD) is a commonly observed fracture pattern. After closed reduction of the dislocated humerus, the GT typically reduces itself into its anatomic position enabling the patient to undergo conservative treatment. The aim of this study was to retrospectively review a consecutive series of patients with conservatively treated GT avulsion fractures after closed reduction of an ASD and analyze radiographic outcome, shoulder function and glenohumeral stability and the conversion rate to surgical treatment. Methods: All patients who underwent closed reduction of a GT avulsion fracture after ASD with the primary intention of conservative treatment between 2017 and 2022 were included. Complications (i.e. conversion to surgical treatment), shoulder function assessed with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and subjective shoulder value, instability assessed with the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability score, radiological impingement (greater tuberosity index = GTI and impingement index = II) and GT fracture pattern were assessed as outcome measurements. Results: A total of 29 patients (mean age 44 years, 27% female) with a mean follow-up of 32.6 (range, 8-96) months were enrolled. Seven patients (24%) underwent surgery due to secondary displacement (n = 4, 14%) or impingement symptoms (n = 3, 10%). All patients who underwent secondary surgery showed a multifragmentary fracture pattern of the GT. Shoulder stiffness (n = 7) and neuropraxia of the axillary nerve (n = 3) were observed temporarily and resolved during the follow-up period. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and subjective shoulder value of the conservatively treated patients at the last follow-up was 89.2 ± 19.1 respectively 86 ± 18.2%. No recurrent glenohumeral dislocation was documented. The mean Western Ontario Shoulder Instability score at last follow-up was 8(0-71). The mean GTI decreased from 1.2 ± 0.1 after ASD to 1.1 ± 0.1 at the last follow-up (P = .002). The mean II decreased from 0.6 ± 0.5 after ASD to 0.4 ± 0.3 at the last follow-up (P = .110). Conclusion: The GT avulsion fragment reduces typically into a close to anatomic position after closed reduction and the GTI even improves with further conservative treatment over time. Close radiological follow-up is necessary to rule out secondary displacement which occurs typically in a multifragmentary fracture pattern. Patients without the need for surgery showed good clinical outcomes without recurrence of glenohumeral instability.

Greater Tuberosity Fractures after RTSA: A Matched Group Analysis.

Periprosthetic fractures, such as acromial and spine fractures, are known complications following implantation of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). The entity of greater tuberosity fractures (GTF) has rarely been studied in the literature. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcome of postoperative greater tuberosity fractures after RTSA compared to a matched control group. The main findings of this study are that a GTF after RTSA is associated with worse clinical outcome scores (mean absolute CS 50 ± 19 (p = 0.032); SSV 63% ± 26 (p = 0.022); mean force 1 kg ± 2 kg (p = 0.044)) compared with the control group (mean absolute CS 62 ± 21; SSV 77% ± 29; mean force 2 kg ± 2 kg). In terms of postoperative range of motion, the fracture group was significantly worse in terms of external rotation (17° ± 19° vs. 30° ± 19° (p = 0.029)). Internal rotation, flexion, as well as abduction of the shoulder appear to be unaffected (internal rotation GTF 4 ± 2, control group 5 ± 3 (p = 0.138); flexion GTF 102° ± 28°, control group 114° ± 27° (p = 0.160); abduction GTF 109° ± 42°, control group 120° ± 39° (p = 0.317)).