Perioperative outcomes in gynecologic pelvic exenteration before and after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery program.

OBJECTIVES: To compare perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies before and after implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols. METHODS: We performed an institutional retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies before (1/1/2006-12/30/2014) and after (1/1/2015-6/30/2023) ERAS implementation. We described ERAS compliance rates. We compared outcomes up to 60 days post-exenteration. Complication grades were defined by the Clavien-Dindo system. RESULTS: Overall, 105 women underwent pelvic exenteration; 74 (70.4%) in the pre-ERAS and 31 (29.5%) in the ERAS cohorts. There were no differences between cohorts in age, body mass index, race, primary disease site, type of exenteration, urinary diversion, or vaginal reconstruction. All patients had complications, with at least one grade II+ complication in 94.6% of pre-ERAS and 90.3% of ERAS patients. The ERAS cohort had more grade I-II gastrointestinal (61.3% vs 21.6%, p < 0.001) and hematologic (61.3% vs 36.5%, p = 0.030) and grade III-IV renal (29.0% vs 12.2%, p = 0.048) and wound (45.2% vs 18.9%, p = 0.008) complications compared to the pre-ERAS cohort. ERAS patients had a higher rate of ileus (38.7% vs 10.8%, p = 0.002), urinary leak (22.6% vs 5.4%, p = 0.014), pelvic abscess (35.5% vs 10.8%, p = 0.005), postoperative bleeding requiring intervention (61.3% vs 28.4%, p = 0.002), and readmission (71.4% vs 46.5%, p = 0.025). Median ERAS compliance was 60%. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic exenteration remains a morbid procedure, and complications were more common in ERAS compared to pre-ERAS cohorts. ERAS protocols should be optimized and tailored to the complexity of pelvic exenteration compared to standard gynecologic oncology ERAS pathways.

Longitudinal perioperative patient-reported outcomes in open compared with minimally invasive hysterectomy.

BACKGROUND: There are few prospective studies in the gynecologic surgical literature that compared patient-reported outcomes between open and minimally invasive hysterectomies within enhanced recovery after surgery pathways. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare prospectively collected perioperative patient-reported symptom burden and interference measures in open compared with minimally invasive hysterectomy cohorts within enhanced recovery after surgery pathways. STUDY DESIGN: We compared patient-reported symptom burden and functional interference in 646 patients who underwent a hysterectomy (254 underwent open surgery and 392 underwent minimally invasive surgery) for benign and malignant indications under enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. Outcomes were prospectively measured using the validated MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, which was administered perioperatively up to 8 weeks after surgery. Cohorts were compared using Fisher exact and chi-squared tests, adjusted longitudinal generalized linear mixed modeling, and Kaplan Meier curves to model return to no or mild symptoms. RESULTS: The open cohort had significantly worse preoperative physical functional interference (P=.001). At the time of hospital discharge postoperatively, the open cohort reported significantly higher mean symptom severity scores and more moderate or severe scores for overall (P<.001) and abdominal pain (P<.001), fatigue (P=.001), lack of appetite (P<.001), bloating (P=.041), and constipation (P<.001) when compared with the minimally invasive cohort. The open cohort also had significantly higher interference in physical functioning (score 5.0 vs 2.7; P<.001) than the minimally invasive cohort at the time of discharge with no differences in affective interference between the 2 groups. In mixed modeling analysis of the first 7 postoperative days, both cohorts reported improved symptom burden and functional interference over time with generally slower recovery in the open cohort. From 1 to 8 postoperative weeks, the open cohort had worse mean scores for all evaluated symptoms and interference measures except for pain with urination, although scores indicated mild symptomatic burden and interference in both cohorts. The time to return to no or mild symptoms was significantly longer in the open cohort for overall pain (14 vs 4 days; P<.001), fatigue (8 vs 4 days; P<.001), disturbed sleep (2 vs 2 days; P<.001), and appetite (1.5 vs 1 days; P<.001) but was significantly longer in the minimally invasive cohort for abdominal pain (42 vs 28 days; P<.001) and bloating (42 vs 8 days; P<.001). The median time to return to no or mild functional interference was longer in the open than in the minimally invasive hysterectomy cohort for physical functioning (36 vs 32 days; P<.001) with no difference in compositive affective functioning (5 vs 5 days; P=.07) between the groups. CONCLUSION: Open hysterectomy was associated with increased symptom burden in the immediate postoperative period and longer time to return to no or mild symptom burden and interference with physical functioning. However, all patient-reported measures improved within days to weeks of both open and minimally invasive surgery and differences were not always clinically significant.

Risk of thrombosis and bleeding in gynecologic cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to provide procedure-specific estimates of the risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism and major bleeding in the absence of thromboprophylaxis, following gynecologic cancer surgery. DATA SOURCES: We conducted comprehensive searches on Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for observational studies. We also reviewed reference lists of eligible studies and review articles. We performed separate searches for randomized trials addressing effects of thromboprophylaxis and conducted a web-based survey on thromboprophylaxis practice. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Observational studies enrolling ≥50 adult patients undergoing gynecologic cancer surgery procedures reporting absolute incidence for at least 1 of the following were included: symptomatic pulmonary embolism, symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic venous thromboembolism, bleeding requiring reintervention (including reexploration and angioembolization), bleeding leading to transfusion, or postoperative hemoglobin <70 g/L. METHODS: Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility, performed data extraction, and evaluated risk of bias of eligible articles. We adjusted the reported estimates for thromboprophylaxis and length of follow-up and used the median value from studies to determine cumulative incidence at 4 weeks postsurgery stratified by patient venous thromboembolism risk factors. The GRADE approach was applied to rate evidence certainty. RESULTS: We included 188 studies (398,167 patients) reporting on 37 gynecologic cancer surgery procedures. The evidence certainty was generally low to very low. Median symptomatic venous thromboembolism risk (in the absence of prophylaxis) was <1% in 13 of 37 (35%) procedures, 1% to 2% in 11 of 37 (30%), and >2.0% in 13 of 37 (35%). The risks of venous thromboembolism varied from 0.1% in low venous thromboembolism risk patients undergoing cervical conization to 33.5% in high venous thromboembolism risk patients undergoing pelvic exenteration. Estimates of bleeding requiring reintervention varied from <0.1% to 1.3%. Median risks of bleeding requiring reintervention were <1% in 22 of 29 (76%) and 1% to 2% in 7 of 29 (24%) procedures. CONCLUSION: Venous thromboembolism reduction with thromboprophylaxis likely outweighs the increase in bleeding requiring reintervention in many gynecologic cancer procedures (eg, open surgery for ovarian cancer and pelvic exenteration). In some procedures (eg, laparoscopic total hysterectomy without lymphadenectomy), thromboembolism and bleeding risks are similar, and decisions depend on individual risk prediction and values and preferences regarding venous thromboembolism and bleeding.

Risk of thrombosis and bleeding in gynecologic noncancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to provide procedure-specific estimates of the risk for symptomatic venous thromboembolism and major bleeding in noncancer gynecologic surgeries. DATA SOURCES: We conducted comprehensive searches on Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Furthermore, we performed separate searches for randomized trials that addressed the effects of thromboprophylaxis. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Eligible studies were observational studies that enrolled ≥50 adult patients who underwent noncancer gynecologic surgery procedures and that reported the absolute incidence of at least 1 of the following: symptomatic pulmonary embolism, symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic venous thromboembolism, bleeding that required reintervention (including re-exploration and angioembolization), bleeding that led to transfusion, or postoperative hemoglobin level <70 g/L. METHODS: A teams of 2 reviewers independently assessed eligibility, performed data extraction, and evaluated the risk of bias of the eligible articles. We adjusted the reported estimates for thromboprophylaxis and length of follow-up and used the median value from studies to determine the cumulative incidence at 4 weeks postsurgery stratified by patient venous thromboembolism risk factors and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to rate the evidence certainty. RESULTS: We included 131 studies (1,741,519 patients) that reported venous thromboembolism risk estimates for 50 gynecologic noncancer procedures and bleeding requiring reintervention estimates for 35 procedures. The evidence certainty was generally moderate or low for venous thromboembolism and low or very low for bleeding requiring reintervention. The risk for symptomatic venous thromboembolism varied from a median of <0.1% for several procedures (eg, transvaginal oocyte retrieval) to 1.5% for others (eg, minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy, 1.2%-4.6% across patient venous thromboembolism risk groups). Venous thromboembolism risk was <0.5% for 30 (60%) of the procedures; 0.5% to 1.0% for 10 (20%) procedures; and >1.0% for 10 (20%) procedures. The risk for bleeding the require reintervention varied from <0.1% (transvaginal oocyte retrieval) to 4.0% (open myomectomy). The bleeding requiring reintervention risk was <0.5% in 17 (49%) procedures, 0.5% to 1.0% for 12 (34%) procedures, and >1.0% in 6 (17%) procedures. CONCLUSION: The risk for venous thromboembolism in gynecologic noncancer surgery varied between procedures and patients. Venous thromboembolism risks exceeded the bleeding risks only among selected patients and procedures. Although most of the evidence is of low certainty, the results nevertheless provide a compelling rationale for restricting pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis to a minority of patients who undergo gynecologic noncancer procedures.

Metronidazole and cefazolin vs cefazolin alone for surgical site infection prophylaxis in gynecologic surgery at a comprehensive cancer center.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection is one of the most common complications of gynecologic cancer surgery. Current guidelines recommend the administration of cefazolin preoperatively to reduce surgical site infection rates for patients undergoing clean-contaminated surgeries such as hysterectomy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a quality improvement project adding metronidazole to cefazolin for antibiotic prophylaxis on surgical site infection rate for women undergoing gynecologic surgery at a comprehensive cancer center. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included patients who underwent surgery in the gynecologic oncology department from May 2017 to June 2023. Patients with penicillin allergies and those undergoing concomitant bowel resections and/or joint cases were excluded. The preintervention group patients had surgery from May 2017 to April 2022, and the postintervention group patients had surgery from April 2022 to June 2023. The primary outcome was a 30-day surgical site infection rate. Sensitivity analyses were performed to compare surgical site infection rates on the basis of actual antibiotics received and for those who had a hysterectomy. Factors independently associated with surgical site infection were identified using a multivariable logistic regression model adjusting for confounding variables. RESULTS: Of 3343 patients, 2572 (76.9%) and 771 (23.1%) were in the pre-post intervention groups, respectively. Most patients (74.7%) had a hysterectomy performed. Thirty-four percent of cases were for nononcologic (benign) indications. Preintervention patients were more likely to receive appropriate preoperative antibiotics (95.6% vs 90.7%; P<.001). The overall surgical site infection rate before the intervention was 4.7% compared with 2.6% after (P=.010). The surgical site infection rate for all patients who underwent hysterectomy was 4.9% (preintervention) vs 2.8% (postintervention) (P=.036); a similar trend was seen for benign cases (4.4% vs 2.4%; P=.159). On multivariable analysis, the odds ratio for surgical site infection was 0.49 (95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.63) for the postintervention compared with the preintervention group (P<.001). In a sensitivity analysis (n=3087), the surgical site infection rate was 4.5% for those who received cefazolin alone compared with 2.3% for those who received cefazolin plus metronidazole, with significantly decreased odds of surgical site infection for the cefazolin plus metronidazole group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.40 [95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.53]; P<.001). Among only those who had a hysterectomy performed, the odds of surgical site infection were significantly reduced for those in the postintervention group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.63 [95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.86]; P=.003). CONCLUSION: The addition of metronidazole to cefazolin before gynecologic surgery decreased the surgical site infection rate by half, even after accounting for other known predictors of surgical site infection and differences in practice patterns over time. Providers should consider this combination regimen in women undergoing gynecologic surgery, especially for cases involving hysterectomy.

Decreasing Utilization of Vaginal Hysterectomy in the United States: An Analysis by Candidacy for Vaginal Approach.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to assess trends in hysterectomy routes by patients who are likely and unlikely candidates for a vaginal approach. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent vaginal, abdominal, or laparoscopic/robotics-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy between 2017 and 2020 using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients undergoing hysterectomy for a primary diagnosis of benign uterine pathology, dysplasia, abnormal uterine bleeding, or pelvic floor disorders were eligible for inclusion. Patients who were parous, had no history of pelvic or abdominal surgery, and had a uterine weight ≤ 280 g on pathology were considered likely candidates for vaginal hysterectomy based on an algorithm developed to guide the surgical approach. Average annual changes in the proportion of likely vaginal hysterectomy candidates and route of hysterectomy were assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 77,829 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 13,738 (17.6%) were likely vaginal hysterectomy candidates. Among likely vaginal hysterectomy candidates, the rate of vaginal hysterectomy was 34.5%, whereas among unlikely vaginal hysterectomy candidates, it was 14.1%. The overall vaginal hysterectomy rate decreased -1.2%/year (p < 0.01). This decreasing trend was nearly twice as rapid among likely vaginal hysterectomy candidates (-1.9%/year, p < .01) compared with unlikely vaginal hysterectomy candidates (-1.1%/year, P < 0.01); the difference in trends was statistically significant (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of vaginal hysterectomy performed for eligible indications decreased between 2017 and 2020 in a national surgical registry. This negative trend was more pronounced among patients who were likely candidates for vaginal hysterectomy based on favorable parity, surgical history, and uterine weight.

Procedure-specific simulation for vaginal surgery training: A randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Vaginal surgery has a superior outcome profile compared with other surgical routes, yet skills are declining because of low case volumes. Graduating residents' confidence and preparedness for vaginal surgery has plummeted in the past decade. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether procedure-specific simulation skills, vs usual training, result in improved operative competence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We completed a randomized controlled trial of didactic and procedural training via low fidelity vaginal surgery models for anterior repair, posterior repair (PR), vaginal hysterectomy (VH), recruiting novice gynecology residents at three academic centers. We evaluated performance via global rating scale (GRS) in the real operating room and for corresponding procedures by attending surgeon blinded to group. Prespecified secondary outcomes included procedural steps knowledge, overall performance, satisfaction, self-confidence and intraoperative parameters. A priori sample size estimated 50 residents (20% absolute difference in GRS score, 25% SD, 80% power, alpha 0.05). CLINICALTRIALS: gov: Registration no. NCT05887570. RESULTS: We randomized 83 residents to intervention or control and 55 completed the trial (2011-23). Baseline characteristics were similar, except for more fourth-year control residents. After adjustment of confounders (age, level, baseline knowledge), GRS scores showed significant differences overall (mean difference 8.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.2-16.1; p = 0.044) and for VH (mean difference 12.0; 95% CI: 1.8-22.3; p = 0.02). The intervention group had significantly higher procedural steps knowledge and self-confidence for VH and/or PR (p < 0.05, adjusted analysis). Estimated blood loss, operative time and complications were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to usual training, procedure-specific didactic and low fidelity simulation modules for vaginal surgery resulted in significant improvements in operative performance and several other skill parameters.

Extraction Laparotomy for Specimen Retrieval does not Alter Same Day Discharge Plans.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if extraction laparotomy (EL) for intact specimen removal adversely impacted the feasibility or safety of same-day discharge (SDD) in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for confirmed or suspected gynecologic malignancies. DESIGN: Retrospective study SETTING: Single institution study PATIENTS: Patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic malignancy at a single institution, who underwent extraction laparotomy (N=67) and age matched controls (N=134) INTERVENTIONS: Comparing same day discharge rates, complications, readmission and outpatient follow up after between patients requiring extraction laparotomy to those that did not after minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 1224 patients were identified. Sixty-seven patients underwent EL for specimen extraction. From the remainder, 134 patients were selected as age matched controls. SDD rate was 83% (EL) vs. 87% (no EL) (p=.39). There was no difference in median pain scores (1.8 vs. 1.9 p=.86), length of stay (LOS) (0 days for both) (p=.41), 30-day readmission rate (6% vs. 3%) (p=.45), ED visit (13% vs. 10%) (p=.76) or any patient contact (34% vs. 39%) (p=.53), between the groups. Specimen weight was higher for EL (524g vs 142g, p<.001), as was estimated blood loss (EBL) (104ml vs. 46ml, p<.001), and surgery time was increased by 22 minutes in the EL group (121 min vs. 99 min, p<.001). Patients who underwent EL did require more narcotics in PACU 20.5 vs 12.2 OME p=.033, however this did not translate to increased number of narcotics prescribed at discharge. On logistic regression a higher specimen weight trended to increase the likelihood of admission (OR 1.04 CI 1.01-1.08), however, surgery time, time in PACU, race, BMI, surgery type or need for EL did not predict SDD or need for admission. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive surgery patients who require extraction laparotomy can still achieve SDD. Same-day discharge is safe and feasible without increased risk of readmission, pain score, or unscheduled patient contact post-operatively.

Clinical Trial Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To study racial and ethnic disparities in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Online review of all published MIGS RCTs in high-impact journals from 2012 to 2023. PATIENTS: Journals included all first quartile obstetrics and gynecology journals, as well as The New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, The British Medical Journal, and The Journal of the American Medical Association. The National Institutes of Health's PubMed and the ClinicalTrials.gov websites were queried using the following search terms from the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology's certifying examination bulletin 2022 to obtain relevant trials: adenomyosis, adnexal surgery, abnormal uterine bleeding, cystectomy, endometriosis, fibroids, gynecology, hysterectomy, hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, leiomyoma, minimally invasive gynecology, myomectomy, ovarian cyst, and robotic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: The US Census Bureau data were used to estimate the expected number of participants. We calculated the enrollment ratio (ER) of actual to expected participants for US trials with available race and ethnicity data. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 352 RCTs were identified. Of these, race and/or ethnicity data were available in 65 studies (18.5%). We analyzed the 46 studies that originated in the United States, with a total of 4645 participants. Of these RCTs, only 8 (17.4%) reported ethnicity in addition to race. When comparing published RCT data with expected proportions of participants, White participants were overrepresented (70.8% vs. 59.6%; ER, 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52-1.81), as well as Black or African American participants (15.4% vs. 13.7%; ER, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.03-1.29). Hispanic (6.7% vs. 19.0%; ER, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.27-0.35), Asian (1.7% vs. 6.1%; ER, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.20-0.34), Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (0.1% vs. 0.3%; ER, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.74), and Indian or Alaska Native participants (0.2% vs. 1.3%; ER, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.08-0.32) were underrepresented. When comparing race/ethnicity proportions in the 20 states where the RCTs were conducted, Black or African American participants were underrepresented. CONCLUSION: In MIGS RCTs conducted in the United States, White and Black or African American participants are overrepresented compared with other races, and ethnicity is characterized in fewer than one-fifth of trials. Efforts should be made to improve racial and ethnic recruitment equity and reporting in future MIGS RCTs.

Gynecologic Surgical Subspecialty Training Decreases Surgical Complications in Benign Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of gynecologic subspecialty training on surgical outcomes in benign minimally invasive hysterectomies (MIHs) while accounting for surgeon volume. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent an MIH between 2014 and 2017. SETTING: Single community hospital system. PATIENTS: Patients were identified via Current Procedural Terminology codes for MIH: vaginal, laparoscopic, or robotic. Exclusion criteria included a gynecologic cancer diagnosis or concomitant major procedure at the time of hysterectomy. One thousand six hundred thirty-one patients underwent a benign MIH performed by a gynecologic generalist or a subspecialist in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery, urogynecology and pelvic reconstructive surgery, or gynecologic oncology; 125 hysterectomies were vaginal, 539 were conventional laparoscopic, and 967 were robotic. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Surgical outcomes, including intraoperative complications, operative outcomes, and postoperative readmissions and reoperations, were compared between generalists and subspecialists and were stratified by surgeon volume status, with high-volume (HV) defined as performing 12 or more hysterectomies annually. Odds ratios for the primary outcome, Clavien-Dindo Grade III complications (which included visceral injuries, conversions, and reoperations within 90 days), were calculated to evaluate the impact of subspecialty training while accounting for surgeon volume status. Of 1631 MIHs, 855 (52.4%) were performed by generalists and 776 (47.6%) by subspecialists. HV generalists performed 618 (37.9%) of MIHs, and 237 (14.5%) were performed by low-volume generalists. All subspecialists were HV surgeons; 38.1% of generalists were HV. The odds ratio of a Clavien-Dindo Grade III complication was 0.39 (0.25-0.62) for hysterectomies performed by subspecialists compared to HV generalists after adjusting for potential confounding variables (p <.001). Subspecialists and HV surgeons had significantly lower incidences of visceral injuries, transfusions, blood loss over 500 mL, and conversions compared with generalists and low-volume surgeons, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both subspecialty training and high surgeon volume status are associated with a lower risk of surgical complications in benign MIH. Subspecialty training is associated with a reduction in surgical complications even after accounting for surgeon volume.

Preoperative Anemia Prior to Gynecologic Surgery is Associated With Increased Healthcare Costs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare healthcare utilization costs between anemic and nonanemic patients undergoing elective hysterectomy and myomectomy for benign indications from the date of surgery to 30 days postoperatively. DESIGN: Retrospective population-based cohort study. SETTING: Single-payer publicly funded healthcare system in Ontario, Canada between 2013 and 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Adult women (≥18 years of age) who underwent elective hysterectomy or myomectomy (laparoscopic/laparotomy) for benign indications. INTERVENTIONS: Our exposure of interest was preoperative anemia, defined as the most recent hemoglobin value <12 g/dL on the complete blood count measured before the date of surgery. Our primary outcome was healthcare costs (total and disaggregated) from the perspective of the single-payer publicly funded healthcare system. RESULTS: Of the 59 270 patients in the cohort, 11 802 (19.9%) had preoperative anemia. After propensity matching, standardized differences in all baseline characteristics (N = 10 103 per group) were <0.10. In the matched cohort, the mean total healthcare cost per anemic patient was higher compared to cost per nonanemic patient ($6134.88 ± $2782.38 vs $6009.97 ± $2423.27, p < .001). Anemic patients, compared to nonanemic patients, had a higher mean difference in total healthcare cost of $124.91 per patient (95% CI $53.54-$196.29) translating to an increased cost attributable to anemia of 2.08% (95% CI 0.89%-3.28%, p < .001). In a subgroup analysis of patients undergoing hysterectomy (N = 9041), the cost was also significantly higher for anemic patients (mean difference per patient of $117.67, 95% CI $41.58-$193.75). For those undergoing myomectomy (N = 1062) the difference in cost was not statistically significant (mean difference $186.61, 95% CI -$17.42 to $390.65). CONCLUSION: Preoperative anemia was associated with significantly increased healthcare resource utilization and costs for patients undergoing elective gynecologic surgery. Although the cost difference per case was modest, when extrapolated to the population level, this difference could result in substantially significant cost to the healthcare system, attributable to preoperative anemia.

Risk analysis of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

AIMS: This study is designed to identify risk factors of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery and establish a nomogram model. METHODS: In this retrospective and multicenter study, we collected and analyzed data from 1233 patients who underwent gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. The Lasso algorithm was used to optimize the selection of independent variables in the development group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to explore the risk factors of PONV to develop the predictive nomogram model. Finally, we used an internal and external verification group and machine learning (ML) to evaluate the accuracy and clinical applicability of the model. RESULTS: The dosage of sufentanil in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), the dosage of remifentanil, the use of neostigmine, duration of surgery and the maximum value of the PETCO2 were risk factors of PONV in patients after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. In contrast, the dosage of propofol during the surgery and the use of steroids were protective factors. The nomogram was then established to predict the incidence of PONV in these patients based on the above eight indicators. The C-index of the development group, internal, and external verification groups are 0.802, 0.857, and 0.966, respectively. CONCLUSION: A nomogram model was developed to predict the incidence of PONV in patients after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. This model was found to be reliable and of high clinical value.

The Role of TAP/RS Block in Minor Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare, in patients undergoing minor gynecological laparoscopic procedures, the effects of ultrasound (US)-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) + rectus sheath (RS) block versus no TAP/RS block in terms of post-surgical pain control using the numeric pain rating scale (NRS) and the degree of patient satisfaction, according to the main goals of Early Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs. The primary outcome is to value the postoperative abdominal pain using NRS in both groups. Secondary outcomes are to evaluate blood values, presence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative ileus, level of patient expected satisfaction, time of discharge, length of stay (LOS), and the amounts of additional analgesics required. DESIGN: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, patients were randomly assigned to loco-regional anesthesia (LRA) group, who received TAP and RS block under US guidance, or no loco-regional anesthesia (N-LRA) group. Enrolled patients were randomized 1:1 to either receive bilateral TAP/RS block with ropivacaine or sham treatment (patches were applied on the abdominal wall of the patients under general anesthesia). PARTICIPANTS: All patients aged between 18 and 75 years, with ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status 1-2, undergoing laparoscopic minor gynecological surgery, were enrolled. SETTING: The study was conducted to the University of Campus Bio-Medico Hospital of Rome. METHODS: Half an hour before surgery, all patients received gabapentin 300 mg per os. Once the patient underwent general anesthesia, US-guided bilateral TAP/RS block was performed by the anesthesiology team, while the uterine manipulator was positioned by a gynecology resident (not involved in the study). In the operative room, all patients received the same standardized anesthetic regimen. Postoperative abdominal pain was assessed at rest, after palpation, during movement, and after a cough by evaluating the patient at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h after surgery, using the NRS from 0 to 10 in both groups. The amount of drug used for analgesia in the first 48 h after surgery was recorded. Moreover, hemoglobin, white blood cells, and c-reactive protein levels were recorded at 24, 48, and 72 h. The presence of PONV and the postoperative ileus was recorded throughout convalescence. The expected level of patient satisfaction at discharge and finally the LOS were assessed. LIMITATIONS: The major weakness of this study is that 60 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine was administered to each patient, without considering weight differences, yet contemporary literature rarely suggests volume/dose titration in fascial blocks. RESULTS: A total of 104 women, undergoing gynecological minor laparoscopic surgery, were enrolled and assigned to LRA group (53 pts) and N-LRA group (51 pts). Postoperative pain was significantly reduced in patients who received TAP/RS block. A reduction in the intake of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs after surgery was registered in LRA group (p < 0.01). Moreover, a significant reduction of LOS (45.97 ± 9.87 vs. 65.08 ± 17.32 h; p < 0.01) and PONV was observed in the LRA group, as well as a better level of patient satisfaction at discharge (9.43 ± 0.94 vs. 8.26 ± 1.19; p < 0.01), compared to the N-LRA group. CONCLUSIONS: US-guided TAP and RS block significantly reduces postoperative pain after minor gynecologic laparoscopic surgery and improves patients' post-operative recovery.

Effectiveness of Mechanical Bowel Preparation before Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the effect of bowel preparation using only oral polyethylene glycol electrolyte (PEG) solution versus oral PEG solution combined with mechanical sodium phosphate (NaP) enema on the surgical field visualization in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic gynecologic procedures. METHODS: Participants were randomized to either a single oral PEG solution or an oral PEG solution combined by mechanical NaP enema. The intraoperative visualization of the surgical field, the ease of manipulation of the bowels, and overall difficulty level of the surgery were evaluated by the surgeon using a self-administered questionnaire. After the surgery, the patients completed a survey assessing postoperative gastrointestinal discomfort. RESULTS: A total of 114 women were enrolled and randomized to oral PEG solution-only group (n = 48), and oral PEG plus mechanical NaP enema group (n = 66). Forty-two women in oral PEG-only group and 59 oral PEG plus NaP enema group completed the study. There was no difference in intraoperative visualization or overall difficulty of the operation between the two groups, and bowel manipulation was easier in the oral PEG-only group. Also, there was no difference in operating time between the groups. The patients' level of gastrointestinal discomfort after the surgery was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Routine use of mechanical NaP enema before robot-assisted laparoscopic gynecologic surgery is not recommended, because it has no additional benefit regarding intraoperative visualization or the surgical level of difficulty over oral bowel preparation methods.

Oncological outcomes and risk factors for recurrence of mucinous borderline ovarian tumors: A 15-year experience at a tertiary center.

BACKGROUND: The most common subtype of borderline ovarian tumors in Asia is mucinous borderline ovarian tumors (mBOTs). Intraoperative distinction from mucinous carcinoma can be difficult. Despite the indolent behavior of mBOTs, recurrence or metastases may occur. The objectives of this study were to determine the oncological outcomes of mBOTs and the risk factors for their recurrence. RESULTS: This retrospective study enrolled patients with mBOTs treated or referred to our institution between January 2005 and December 2019. Histological reviews of the recurrent cases (primary and recurrent or metastatic tumors) were performed. Patients with other tumor subtypes, pseudomyxoma peritonei, or no in-house operation were excluded. Two hundred thirty-two patients were diagnosed with mBOTs. The median follow-up was 52 months. Six patients (2.58%) had tumor recurrence or metastasis. The risk factors for recurrence were a ruptured tumor, residual tumor after an operation, high serum CA19-9 level, and stage of the disease. The recurrence rates of fertility-sparing and radical surgery were not significantly different. Detailed surgical staging, intraepithelial carcinoma, and microinvasion were also not associated with disease recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: mBOTs have an excellent prognosis. Currently, fertility-sparing surgery is the standard treatment, showing no significant difference in oncological outcomes compared to radical surgery. Patients with risk factors should be closely monitored.

Hysteroscopy: where did we start, and where are we now? The compelling story of what many considered the "Cinderella" of gynecological endoscopy.

Hysteroscopy has truly revolutionized the field of diagnostic and operative gynecology. It is presently regarded as the gold standard method for both the diagnosis and treatment of intrauterine diseases and it has fundamentally altered the way gynecologists treat patients with such conditions. These pathologies can now be diagnosed and treated in an outpatient setting, thanks to technological advancements and instrument downsizing. Two hundred years of development and notable innovation are now reflected in the present hysteroscopic practice. This review attempts to trace the boundaries-pushing history of hysteroscopy by highlighting the advancements in technology and the therapeutic and diagnostic benefits offered by this groundbreaking approach.

Association Between English Proficiency and Postoperative Pain Management for Adult Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: To determine if language-based disparities in postoperative pain management exist in women undergoing gynecologic surgery. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed. METHODS: The electronic medical records were reviewed of individuals, aged 18 to 80, who underwent an abdominal hysterectomy between 2016 and 2021 at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center. A random sample of 100 patients, 50 categorized as English proficient and 50 categorized as having limited English proficiency (LEP), were compared. The primary outcomes were the number of quantitative pain assessments and the total dose of opioid given in oral morphine milligram equivalents. The secondary outcomes were the average pain scores, the number of qualitative pain assessments, postanesthesia care unit length of stay, regional block use, patient-controlled analgesia, or opioid use after the first 24 hours. Linear and generalized linear modeling was used to assess the relationship between English proficiency and the outcomes of interest. FINDINGS: All patients received at least 1 pain assessment while in the postanesthesia care unit (range 2 to 25). There was no significant difference in the number of objective pain assessments or the total dose of opioid given between the groups. There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes between the groups. On subgroup analysis, the presence of a documented bedside interpreter did not result in a significant difference in endpoints. Fewer LEP patients received patient-controlled analgesia (34% LEP vs 58% English proficient), though the difference did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Language barriers may complicate care and impact postoperative recovery. In our population of women in a high-volume, urban, level I, trauma center, there were no observed differences in postoperative pain management practices in patients with LEP compared with English-proficient patients. Standardized nursing protocols may contribute to more equitable care. Ongoing investigations in the identification and prevention of language-related disparities in perioperative care are warranted.

Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Hysterectomy Deconstructed: Expanding Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgeons' Toolbox.

Background: The introduction of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) to the toolbox of gynecologic surgeons has the potential to reverse the trend of vaginal hysterectomy declines. Methods: This review discusses nuances of the vNOTES technique applied to hysterectomy; describes vNOTES hysterectomy, step-by-step (including tips and tricks for low- and high-complexity cases for surgeons who may want to incorporate vNOTES hysterectomy into their surgical repertoires); and examines evidence and research trends in this field. Results: The descriptions in the text, figures, tables, and videos all contribute to giving readers a clear understanding of vNOTES, its advantages, limitations, and research potentials. Conclusions: vNOTES hysterectomy is a unique blend of vaginal, laparoscopic, and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) techniques and is not a new procedure, but rather another tool to use in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. (J GYNECOL SURG 40:78).

Perioperative opioid dispensing and persistent use after benign hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis was conducted to (1) assess the quantity and dose of perioperatively dispensed opioids for benign hysterectomy by procedure route and (2) identify the predictors of persistent opioid use after the procedure. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were systematically searched from study inception to 25 March 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies reporting data on opioid dispensing among patients undergoing benign hysterectomy were considered eligible. The primary outcome was the dosage of opioids dispensed perioperatively (from 30 preoperative days to 21 postoperative days). The secondary outcome was the predictors of persistent opioid use after benign hysterectomy (from 3 months to 3 years postoperatively). Total opioid dispensing was measured in morphine milligram equivalents units. METHODS: The random-effects model was used to pool the mean differences or odds ratios and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: A total of 8 studies presenting data on 377,569 women undergoing benign hysterectomy were included. Of these women, 83% (95% confidence interval, 81-84) were dispensed opioids during the perioperative period. The average amount of perioperatively dispensed opioids was 143.5 morphine milligram equivalents (95% confidence interval, 40-247). Women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy were dispensed a significantly lower amount of opioids than those undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomies. The overall rate of persistent opioid use after benign hysterectomy was 5% (95% confidence interval, 2-8). Younger patient age (odds ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.63), smoking history (odds ratio, 1.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.67-2.10), alcohol use (odds ratio, 3.16; 95% confidence interval, 2.34-4.27), back pain (odds ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.05), and fibromyalgia (odds ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-1.83) were significantly associated with a higher risk of persistent opioid use after benign hysterectomy. However, there was no significant effect of hysterectomy route and operative complexity on persistent opioid use postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Perioperative opioid dispensing was significantly dependent on the route of hysterectomy, with the lowest dispensed morphine milligram equivalents of opioids for vaginal hysterectomy and the highest for abdominal hysterectomy. Nevertheless, hysterectomy route did not significantly predict persistent opioid use postoperatively, whereas younger age, smoking, alcohol use, back pain, and fibromyalgia were significantly associated with persistent opioid use.

Rate of venous thromboembolism on an enhanced recovery program after gynecologic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism is a life-threatening complication of surgery. An Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program is a multimodal care pathway that facilitates faster recovery from surgery. The rate of venous thromboembolism after gynecologic surgery on an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the rate of venous thromboembolism within 30 days of gynecologic surgery on an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway performed at a cancer center. STUDY DESIGN: Data were collected prospectively on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway gynecologic patients undergoing open surgery (November 3, 2014, to March 31, 2021) and minimally invasive surgery (February 1, 2017, to March 31, 2021). Care was delivered at a tertiary cancer care center located in a large urban area. Patients undergoing emergency surgery or multispecialty surgeries were excluded. Patients undergoing open surgery were to receive heparin prophylaxis before surgery, sequential compression devices during surgery and admission, and low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis during admission. If diagnosed with malignancy, patients were to receive extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for 28 days after surgery. For minimally invasive surgery, patients received only sequential compression devices during surgery and no heparin prophylaxis before or after surgery. Venous thromboembolism events were included if detected on imaging obtained for symptoms or other indications. Descriptive statistics and bivariate statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 3329 patients, 1519 (45.6%) underwent laparotomy, 1452 (43.6%) underwent laparoscopy, and 358 (10.8%) underwent robotic surgery. The incidence rates of venous thromboembolism were 0.6% (n=21; 95% confidence interval, 0.4%-0.9%) overall, 1.1% (n=16, 95% confidence interval, 0.6%-1.7%) in the open approach, and 0.3% (n=5; 95% confidence interval, 0.3%-0.6%) in the minimally invasive approach (P=.02). The incidence rates of venous thromboembolism among the 1999 patients with malignancy were 0.9% (n=18; 95% confidence interval, 0.5%-1.4%) overall, 1.4% (n=15; 95% confidence interval, 0.7%-2.2%) in the open approach, and 0.3% (n=3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1%-0.9%) in the minimally invasive approach. The incidence rates of venous thromboembolism among the 1165 patients with benign disease were 0.3% (n=3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1%-0.7%) overall, 0.3% (n=1; 95% confidence interval, 0.0%-1.7%) in the open approach, and 0.2% (n=2; 95% confidence interval, 0.0%-0.9%) in the minimally invasive approach. CONCLUSION: The rate of venous thromboembolism among patients undergoing laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery on an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway was ≤1%. This study established a benchmark for the rate of venous thromboembolism after gynecologic surgery on an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway performed at a cancer center.