Microcirculatory Alterations in Cardiac Surgery: A Comprehensive Guide.

Microcirculation is essential for cellular life and its functions. It comprises a complex network of capillaries, arterioles, and venules, which distributes oxygenated blood across and within organs based on regional metabolic demands. Because previous research indicated that organ function is linked to microcirculatory function, it is crucial to maintain sufficient and effective microcirculatory function during major surgery. Impaired microcirculation can lead to inadequate tissue perfusion, potentially resulting in perioperative complications and an unfavorable outcome. Indeed, changes in microcirculation in cardiovascular disease and cardiac surgery have a direct correlation with prolonged stays in the postoperative intensive care unit and high mortality rates within 30 days. Additionally, cardiopulmonary bypass, a regularly employed method in cardiac surgery, has been proven to induce microcirculatory malfunction and, thus, lead to postoperative multiple organ dysfunction. As global hemodynamic parameters can remain stable or improve, whereas microcirculation is still compromised, tracking microcirculatory variables could lead to the development of targeted microcirculatory treatment within hemodynamic management. Therefore, it is necessary to enhance the use of microcirculatory monitoring in the medical domain to assist physicians in the therapeutic management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This potentially can lead to better hemodynamic management and outcomes. This review article concentrates on the use of handheld video microscopes for real-time microcirculatory assessment of cardiac surgery patients in the immediate and early postoperative period. Emphasis is placed on integrating microcirculatory monitoring with conventional hemodynamic monitoring in the therapeutic management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

How to Define and Meet Blood Pressure Targets After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Review.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) poses a significant challenge to healthcare providers, necessitating meticulous management of hemodynamic parameters to optimize patient outcomes. This article delves into the critical task of defining and meeting continuous arterial blood pressure (ABP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) targets in the context of severe TBI in neurocritical care settings. METHODS: We narratively reviewed existing literature, clinical guidelines, and emerging technologies to propose a comprehensive approach that integrates real-time monitoring, individualized cerebral perfusion target setting, and dynamic interventions. RESULTS: Our findings emphasize the need for personalized hemodynamic management, considering the heterogeneity of patients with TBI and the evolving nature of their condition. We describe the latest advancements in monitoring technologies, such as autoregulation-guided ABP/CPP treatment, which enable a more nuanced understanding of cerebral perfusion dynamics. By incorporating these tools into a proactive monitoring strategy, clinicians can tailor interventions to optimize ABP/CPP and mitigate secondary brain injury. DISCUSSION: Challenges in this field include the lack of standardized protocols for interpreting multimodal neuromonitoring data, potential variability in clinical decision-making, understanding the role of cardiac output, and the need for specialized expertise and customized software to have individualized ABP/CPP targets regularly available. The patient outcome benefit of monitoring-guided ABP/CPP target definitions still needs to be proven in patients with TBI. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that the TBI community take proactive steps to translate the potential benefits of personalized ABP/CPP targets, which have been implemented in certain centers, into a standardized and clinically validated reality through randomized controlled trials.

A Surviving Case of Myocardial Infarction with Ventricular Septal Rupture and Ventricular Aneurysm following Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

A 55-year-old man presented to the emergency department with worsening shortness of breath 1 month after a gastrointestinal bleed. He had congestive heart failure, and an electrocardiogram suggested ischemic heart disease involvement. Echocardiography revealed a ventricular septal defect complicated by a left ventricular aneurysm in the inferior-posterior wall. Conservative treatment was started, but hemodynamic collapse occurred on the third day of admission and coronary angiography revealed a revascularizing lesion in the right fourth posterior descending coronary artery. Subsequently, his hemodynamic status continued to deteriorate, even with an Impella CP® heart pump, so ventricular septal defect patch closure and left ventricular aneurysm suture were performed. His condition improved and he was discharged on day 23 of admission and was not readmitted within 6 months after the procedure. Hemodynamic management of ventricular septal defects requires devices that reduce afterload, and clinicians should be aware of the risk of myocardial infarction after gastrointestinal bleeding.

An updated "norepinephrine equivalent" score in intensive care as a marker of shock severity.

Vasopressors and fluids are the cornerstones for the treatment of shock. The current international guidelines on shock recommend norepinephrine as the first-line vasopressor and vasopressin as the second-line vasopressor. In clinical practice, due to drug availability, local practice variations, special settings, and ongoing research, several alternative vasoconstrictors and adjuncts are used in the absence of precise equivalent doses. Norepinephrine equivalence (NEE) is frequently used in clinical trials to overcome this heterogeneity and describe vasopressor support in a standardized manner. NEE quantifies the total amount of vasopressors, considering the potency of each such agent, which typically includes catecholamines, derivatives, and vasopressin. Intensive care studies use NEE as an eligibility criterion and also an outcome measure. On the other hand, NEE has several pitfalls which clinicians should know, important the lack of conversion of novel vasopressors such as angiotensin II and also adjuncts such as methylene blue, including a lack of high-quality data to support the equation and validate its predictive performance in all types of critical care practice. This review describes the history of NEE and suggests an updated formula incorporating novel vasopressors and adjuncts.

Perioperative clinical practice in liver transplantation: a cross-sectional survey.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to describe some components of the perioperative practice in liver transplantation as reported by clinicians. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional clinical practice survey using an online instrument containing questions on selected themes related to the perioperative care of liver transplant recipients. We sent email invitations to Canadian anesthesiologists, Canadian surgeons, and French anesthesiologists specialized in liver transplantation. We used five-point Likert-type scales (from "never" to "always") and numerical or categorical answers. Results are presented as medians or proportions. RESULTS: We obtained answers from 130 participants (estimated response rate of 71% in Canada and 26% in France). Respondents reported rarely using transesophageal echocardiography routinely but often using it for hemodynamic instability, often using an intraoperative goal-directed hemodynamic management strategy, and never using a phlebotomy (medians from ordinal scales). Fifty-nine percent of respondents reported using a restrictive fluid management strategy to manage hemodynamic instability during the dissection phase. Forty-two percent and 15% of respondents reported using viscoelastic tests to guide intraoperative and postoperative transfusions, respectively. Fifty-four percent of respondents reported not pre-emptively treating preoperative coagulations disturbances, and 91% reported treating them intraoperatively only when bleeding was significant. Most respondents (48-64%) did not have an opinion on the maximal graft ischemic times. Forty-seven percent of respondents reported that a piggyback technique was the preferred vena cava anastomosis approach. CONCLUSION: Different interventions were reported to be used regarding most components of perioperative care in liver transplantation. Our results suggest that significant equipoise exists on the optimal perioperative management of this population.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'objectif de cette étude était de décrire certaines composantes de la pratique périopératoire en transplantation hépatique telles que rapportées par les cliniciens. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené un sondage transversal sur la pratique clinique à l'aide d'un instrument en ligne comportant des questions sur des thèmes sélectionnés liés aux soins périopératoires des receveurs de greffe du foie. Nous avons envoyé des invitations par courriel à des anesthésiologistes canadiens, des chirurgiens canadiens et des anesthésiologistes français spécialisés en transplantation hépatique. Nous avons utilisé des échelles de type Likert à cinq points (de « jamais ¼ à « toujours ¼) et des réponses numériques ou catégorielles. Les résultats sont présentés sous forme de médianes ou de proportions. RéSULTATS: Nous avons obtenu des réponses de 130 participants (taux de réponse estimé à 71 % au Canada et à 26 % en France). Les répondants ont déclaré utiliser rarement l'échocardiographie transœsophagienne de routine, mais l'utiliser fréquemment pour l'instabilité hémodynamique, souvent en utilisant une stratégie de prise en charge hémodynamique peropératoire axée sur les objectifs, et jamais en utilisant une phlébotomie (médianes des échelles ordinales). Cinquante-neuf pour cent des répondants ont déclaré utiliser une stratégie restrictive de gestion liquidienne pour prendre en charge l'instabilité hémodynamique pendant la phase de dissection. Quarante-deux pour cent et 15 % des répondants ont déclaré utiliser des tests viscoélastiques pour guider les transfusions peropératoires et postopératoires, respectivement. Cinquante-quatre pour cent des répondants ont déclaré ne pas traiter préventivement les troubles préopératoires de la coagulation, et 91 % ont déclaré les traiter en peropératoire uniquement lorsque les saignements étaient importants. La plupart des répondants (48-64 %) n'avaient pas d'opinion sur les temps ischémiques maximaux du greffon. Quarante-sept pour cent des répondants ont déclaré qu'une technique de 'piggyback' (anastomose latéroterminale) était l'approche préférée pour l'anastomose de la veine cave. CONCLUSION: Différentes interventions ont été signalées pour la plupart des composantes des soins périopératoires dans la transplantation hépatique. Nos résultats suggèrent qu'il existe une incertitude significative concernant la prise en charge périopératoire optimale de cette population.

Impact of goal-directed hemodynamic management on the incidence of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) remains high after partial nephrectomy. Ischemia-reperfusion injury produced by renal hilum clamping during surgery might have contributed to the development of AKI. In this study we tested the hypothesis that goal-directed fluid and blood pressure management may reduce AKI in patients following partial nephrectomy. METHODS: This was a pilot randomized controlled trial. Adult patients who were scheduled to undergo partial nephrectomy were randomized into two groups. In the intervention group, goal-directed hemodynamic management was performed from renal hilum clamping until end of surgery; the target was to maintain stroke volume variation < 6%, cardiac index 3.0-4.0 L/min/m2 and mean arterial pressure > 95 mmHg with crystalloid fluids and infusion of dobutamine and/or norepinephrine. In the control group, hemodynamic management was performed according to routine practice. The primary outcome was the incidence of AKI within the first 3 postoperative days. RESULTS: From June 2016 to January 2017, 144 patients were enrolled and randomized (intervention group, n = 72; control group, n = 72). AKI developed in 12.5% of patients in the intervention group and in 20.8% of patients in the control group; the relative reduction of AKI was 39.9% in the intervention group but the difference was not statistically significant (relative risk 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-1.28; P = 0.180). No significant differences were found regarding AKI classification, change of estimated glomerular filtration rate over time, incidence of postoperative 30-day complications, postoperative length of hospital stay, as well as 30-day and 6-month mortality between the two groups. CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing partial nephrectomy, goal-directed circulatory management during surgery reduced postoperative AKI by about 40%, although not significantly so. The trial was underpowered. Large sample size randomized trials are needed to confirm our results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02803372 . Date of registration: June 6, 2016.

Vasoactive-Inotropic Score: Evolution, Clinical Utility, and Pitfalls.

Inotropes and vasopressors frequently are administered in critically ill and perioperative patients. However, clinical practice is highly variable across clinicians and institutions. The inotropic score and its upgrade "vasoactive-inotropic score" (VIS) can be used to objectively quantify the degree of hemodynamic support. Several studies demonstrated a correlation between high VIS and poor outcome. Furthermore, VIS can help compare different clinical and research experiences. Several recently developed scores include VIS in their model, although they still require independent validation. Conversely, VIS has several pitfalls, including the fact that a universally recognized version that includes all commonly used vasoactive drugs does not exist. In this review, the authors summarize all the VIS, VIS-related, and VIS-validating manuscripts, and suggest a new updated version of VIS that also includes terlipressin, methylene blue, and angiotensin II.

Respiratory and cardiovascular effects of COVID-19 infection and their management.

The COVID-19 epidemic has put an enormous burden on the health-care system and the economy. The virus has very high infectivity and is crippling in patients developing severe disease. The disease caused by this infective agent, a novel RNA coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), was named by the World Health Organization as COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 usually enters the human body from the respiratory tract and gradually causes systemic disease. The disease is mild in 81% and severe in the balance. The virus causes multiorgan damage and primarily damages airway epithelium, small intestine epithelium, and vascular endothelium, which are organs with high angiotensin-converting enzyme (angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 [ACE2] expression). The most affected organ is the lungs, and the cardiovascular system follows it closely. Symptomatic hypoxic patients are initially treated with oxygen supplementation, but those with severe hypoxia need mechanical ventilation support. Patients with COVID-19 infection present as two phenotypes. The ventilation strategy should be based on the phenotype. The disease causes major hemodynamic disturbances in its invasion of the cardiovascular system. Strict personal protection protocols are needed to ensure the safety of health-care workers and nosocomial spread.

Transpulmonary thermodilution monitoring-guided hemodynamic management improves cognitive function in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective cohort comparison.

BACKGROUND: The effects of goal-directed hemodynamic management using transpulmonary thermodilution (TPT) monitor on the cognitive function of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) remain unclear. The present study aimed to determine whether hemodynamic management with TPT monitor provides better cognitive function compared with standard hemodynamic management. METHODS: Patients with aSAH who were admitted to the intensive care unit in 2016 were assigned to cohort 1, and those admitted in 2017 were assigned to cohort 2. In cohort 1, hemodynamic and fluid management was performed in accordance with the traditional pressure-based hemodynamic parameters and clinical examination, whereas in cohort 2, it was performed in accordance with the TPT monitor-measured flow-based parameters. The incidence of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and pulmonary edema (PE) was determined. The functional outcome of patients was assessed using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score and Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) test at 1 year following aSAH. RESULTS: Cohort 1 included 45 patients and cohort 2 included 39 patients who completed the trial. The incidence of DCI (38% versus 26%) and PE (11% versus 3%) was comparable between the cohorts (p > 0.05). The mRS score was similar between the cohorts (p = 0.11). However, the MoCA score was 20.2 (19.2-21.4) and 23.5 (22.2-24.8) in cohort 1 and cohort 2, respectively (p < 0.001). Accordingly, the occurrence of poor MoCA score (38% versus 18%) was significantly lower in cohort 2 (p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: TPT monitor-based hemodynamic management provides better cognitive outcome than standard hemodynamic management in patients with aSAH.

Closed-loop vasopressor control: in-silico study of robustness against pharmacodynamic variability.

Initial feasibility of a novel closed-loop controller created by our group for closed-loop control of vasopressor infusions has been previously described. In clinical practice, vasopressor potency may be affected by a variety of factors including other pharmacologic agents, organ dysfunction, and vasoplegic states. The purpose of this study was therefore to evaluate the effectiveness of our controller in the face of large variations in drug potency, where 'effective' was defined as convergence on target pressure over time. We hypothesized that the controller would remain effective in the face up to a tenfold variability in drug response. To perform the robustness study, our physiologic simulator was used to create randomized simulated septic patients. 250 simulated patients were managed by the closed-loop in each of 7 norepinephrine responsiveness conditions: 0.1 ×, 0.2 ×, 0.5 ×, 1 ×, 2 ×, 5 ×, and 10 × expected population response to drug dose. Controller performance was evaluated for each level of norepinephrine response using Varvel's criteria as well as time-out-of-target. Median performance error and median absolute performance error were less than 5% in all response levels. Wobble was below 3% and divergence remained negative (i.e. the controller tended to converge towards the target over time) in all norepinephrine response levels, but at the highest response level of 10 × the value approached zero, suggesting the controller may be approaching instability. Response levels of 0.1 × and 0.2 × exhibited significantly higher time-out-of-target in the lower ranges (p < 0.001) compared to the 1 × response level as the controller was slower to correct the initial hypotension. In this simulation study, the closed-loop vasopressor controller remained effective in simulated patients exhibiting 0.1 to 10 × the expected population drug response.

Survey on the Current State of Endotracheal Intubation Among the Critically Ill: HEMAIR Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: In the last decade, the practice of intubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) has evolved. To further examine the current intubation practice in the ICU, we administered a survey to critical care physicians. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey study design. SETTING: Thirty-two academic/nonacademic centers nationally and internationally. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The survey was developed among a core group of physicians with the assistance of the Survey Research Center at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. The survey was pilot tested for functionality and reliability. The response rate was 82 (51%) of 160 among the 32 centers. Although propofol was the induction drug of choice, there was a significant difference with actual ketamine use and those who indicated a preference for it (ketamine: 52% vs 61%; P < .001). The most common airway device used for intubation was direct laryngoscopy (Miller laryngoscope blade) at 56 (68%) followed by video laryngoscopy at 26 (32%). Most (>90%) indicated that they have a difficult airway cart, but only 55 (67%) indicated they have a documented plan to handle a difficult airway with even lower results for documented review of adverse events (49%). CONCLUSION: Although propofol was the induction drug of choice, ketamine was a medication that many preferred to use, possibly relating to the fact that the most common complication postintubation is hypotension. Direct laryngoscopy remains the primary airway device for endotracheal intubation. Finally, although the majority stated they had a difficult airway cart available, most did not have a documented plan in place when encountering a difficult airway or a documented process to review adverse events surrounding intubation.

Intraoperative Anesthetic Management of Lung Transplantation: Center-Specific Practices and Geographic and Centers Size Differences.

OBJECTIVE: Although increasing evidence in lung transplantation (LTx) suggests that intraoperative management could influence outcomes, there are no guidelines available regarding intraoperative management of LTx. The overall goal of the study was to assess geographic and center volume-specific clinical practices in perioperative management. DESIGN: Prospective data analysis. SETTING: Online survey from a single-center university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: European and non-European LTx centers. INTERVENTIONS: An online survey was sent to 176 centers currently performing LTx procedures. It covered organizational data, general anesthesia considerations, fluid therapy and coagulation, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory therapies, and ventilation strategies. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The response rates were 57.5% (n = 42) from European and 32% (n = 33) from non-European countries. Significant differences between European and non-European countries were use of volatile hypnotics (p = 0.016), use of sufentanil (p < 0.001), inotropic agents (p = 0.001) and colloid infusion (p < 0.001), use of calibrated pulse contour analysis (p = 0.004), use of intraoperative traditional laboratory-based coagulation tests (p = 0.001) and platelet function analysis (p = 0.005), and use of higher peak inspiratory pressure (p = 0.009). Center volume-specific differences were use of fentanyl (p = 0.03) and the use of higher peak inspiratory pressure (p = 0.005) for ventilation. Induction of anesthesia and use of advanced hemodynamic monitoring, therapy for pulmonary hypertension, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory therapies, and ventilation strategies were not different among the centers. CONCLUSIONS: This survey demonstrated for the first time statistically significant differences among European and non-European centers and among low- versus high-volume centers regarding intraoperative management during LTx. These observations will be of some guidance for the LTx community and may trigger more extensive studies.

Pre-anesthetic stroke volume variation can predict cardiac output decrease and hypotension during induction of general anesthesia.

This study aimed to assess the reliability of stroke volume variation (SVV) in predicting cardiac output (CO) decrease and hypotension during induction of general anesthesia. Forty-five patients undergoing abdominal surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled. Before induction of anesthesia, patients were required to maintain deep breathing (6-8 times/min), and pre-anesthetic SVV was measured for 1 min by electrical cardiometry. General anesthesia was induced with propofol, remifentanil, rocuronium, and sevoflurane. Study duration was defined from the start of fluid administration till 5 min after tracheal intubation. Blood pressure (BP) was measured every minute. Cardiac output was measured continuously by electrical cardiometry. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were made regarding the incidence of decreased CO (less than 70% of the baseline) and hypotension (mean BP <65 mmHg). The risk of developing decreased CO and hypotension was evaluated by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The time from the start of the procedure to onset of decreased CO was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The area under the ROC curve and optimal threshold value of pre-anesthetic SVV for predicting decreased CO and hypotension were 0.857 and 0.693. Patients with lower SVV exhibited a significantly slower onset and lower incidence of decreased CO than those with higher SVV (p = 0.003). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated high pre-anesthetic SVV as being an independent risk factor for decreased CO and hypotension (odds ratio, 1.43 and 1.16, respectively). In conclusions, pre-anesthetic SVV can predict incidence of decreased CO and hypotension during induction of general anesthesia.

New-onset atrial fibrillation: an update.

New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is the most common perioperative complication of heart surgery, typically occurring in the perioperative period. NOAF commonly occurs in patients who are elderly, or have left atrial enlargement, or left ventricular hypertrophy. Various factors have been identified as being involved in the development of NOAF, and numerous approaches have been proposed for its prevention and treatment. Risk factors include diabetes, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. For prevention of NOAF, ß-blockers and amiodarone are particularly effective and are recommended by guidelines. NOAF can be treated by rhythm/rate control, and antithrombotic therapy. Treatment is required in patients with decreased cardiac function, a heart rate exceeding 130 beats/min, or persistent NOAF lasting for ≥ 48 h. It is anticipated that anticoagulant therapies, as well as hemodynamic management, will also play a major role in the management of NOAF. When using warfarin as an anticoagulant, its dose should be adjusted based on PT-INR. PT-INR should be controlled between 2.0 and 3.0 in patients aged < 70 years and between 1.6 and 2.6 in those aged ≥ 70 years. Rate control combined with antithrombotic therapies for NOAF is expected to contribute to further advances in treatment and improvement of survival.

Blood Pressure Guideline Adherence in Patients with Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke in the Neurointensive Care Unit Setting.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with acute brain injuries require strict physiologic control to minimize morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to assess in-hospital compliance to strict physiologic parameters (BP, HR, ICP, SpO2) in these populations. METHODS: Patients with severe cerebrovascular events were admitted to the neurointensive care unit (NSICU) and were continuously monitored using the BedMasterEX (Excel Medical Electronics Inc, FL) system, which recorded hemodynamic data via an arterial catheter continuously in 5-s intervals. Furthermore, we investigated the impact of healthcare provider shift changes (6-8 a.m./p.m) and of day (6 a.m.-6 p.m.) versus night (6 p.m-6 a.m) shifts in hemodynamic control. RESULTS: Fifty patients admitted to the NSICU, 50 % male, mean age 59.7 ± 13.9 years with subarachnoid hemorrhage (23), ischemic stroke (8), subdural hematoma (4), intracerebral hemorrhage (3), intraventricular hemorrhage (2), and miscellaneous injuries (10) were enrolled. Data represented 2,337 total hours of continuous monitoring. Systolic BPs (SBP) were on average outside of recommended ranges 32.26 ± 30.46 % of the monitoring period. We subdivided adherence to ideal SBP range: optimal (≥99 % of time spent in NSICU within range) was achieved in 12 %, adequate (90 %) in 16 %, suboptimal (80 %) in 20 %, inadequate I (70 %) in 12 %, and inadequate II (<70 %) in 40 % of patients. Comparison of shift change %time and day versus night %time out of parameter yielded no statistically significant differences across SAH patients. CONCLUSION: Hemodynamic management of patients with cerebrovascular injuries, based on targeted thresholds in the NSICU, yielded optimal control of SBP in only 28 % of our patients (within parameters ≥90 % of time).

Early intensive versus minimally invasive approach to postoperative hemodynamic management after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The results of previous studies suggest that early goal-directed fluid therapy (EGDT) reduces delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, but the effects of EGDT on clinical outcomes are still unclear. This study aimed to determine whether EGDT improves outcomes compared with standard less-invasive hemodynamic therapy. METHODS: This study included 160 patients treated within 24 hours after subarachnoid hemorrhage, randomized to receive either (1) EGDT guided by preload volume and cardiac output monitored by transpulmonary thermodilution (treatment group) or (2) standard therapy guided by fluid balance or central venous pressure, assisted by uncalibrated less-invasive cardiac output monitoring during hyperdynamic therapy in patients with clinical or radiological indications of DCI (control group). DCI determined by clinical or radiological findings and functional outcome determined by the modified Rankin Scale score at 3 months were compared between groups. RESULTS: For all clinical grades combined, there were no significant differences in the rates of DCI (33% versus 42%; P=0.33) or modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 3 at 3 months (67% versus 57%; P=0.22) between the 2 groups. For patients with poor clinical grade, those who received EGDT had a significantly lower rate of DCI (5% versus 14%; P=0.036), modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 3 at 3 months (52% versus 36%; P=0.026), and shorter length of intensive care unit stay (14 versus 17 days; P=0.043) than those who received standard therapy. CONCLUSIONS: EGDT is beneficial for reducing DCI and improving postoperative functional outcome in patients with poor clinical grade. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: UMIN000007509.

Esmolol's Role in Hemodynamic Management During Pheochromocytoma Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.

Pheochromocytoma (PCC) surgery presents significant challenges due to the hemodynamic instability induced by catecholamine release. Effective perioperative management is essential to minimize complications and ensure optimal outcomes. This comprehensive review examines the role of esmolol, a short-acting beta-blocker, in hemodynamic stabilization during PCC surgery. We provide an overview of the pathophysiology of PCC, highlighting the cardiovascular effects of excessive catecholamines. Challenges in perioperative management and the need for effective hemodynamic control are discussed. The pharmacology and mechanisms of action of esmolol are outlined, along with evidence from clinical studies supporting its use in PCC surgery. Comparative analyses with other hemodynamic agents are presented, along with recommendations for optimizing esmolol administration and monitoring. Key findings include the ability of esmolol to attenuate catecholamine-induced hypertension and tachycardia, thereby promoting hemodynamic stability and reducing the risk of intraoperative cardiovascular crises. Implications for clinical practice include the incorporation of esmolol into perioperative management protocols and the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration. Future research directions include further elucidating optimal dosing regimens, comparative effectiveness studies, and exploring novel therapeutic approaches. Collaboration among clinicians, researchers, and pharmaceutical companies is essential to advance the care of patients undergoing surgery for PCC.

Spinal cord injury: Current trends in acute management.

Introduction: Traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) is a profoundly debilitating condition necessitating prompt intervention. However, the optimal acute treatment strategy remains a subject of debate. Research question: The aim of this overview is to elucidate prevailing trends in the acute tSCI management. Material and Methods: We provided an overview using peer-reviewed studies. Results: Early surgical treatment (<24h after trauma) appears beneficial compared to delayed surgery. Nonetheless, there is insufficient evidence supporting a positive influence of ultra-early surgery on neurological outcome in tSCI. Furthermore, the optimal surgical approach to decompress the spinal cord remains unclear. These uncertainties extend to a growing aging population suffering from central cord syndrome (CCS). Additionally, there is a paucity of evidence supporting the beneficial effects of strict hemodynamic management. Discussion and Conclusion: This overview highlights the current literature on surgical timing, surgical techniques and hemodynamic management during the acute phase of tSCI. It also delves into considerations specific to the elderly population experiencing CCS.

Predicting Intraoperative Hypotension: An Intraoperative Case Report.

Intraoperative hypotension (IOH) is a common issue associated with acute kidney injury, myocardial injury, stroke, and death. IOH may be avoided with the incorporation of newer advanced hemodynamic monitoring technologies. This case study examines the use of advanced hemodynamic monitoring with an early warning system for the intraoperative hemodynamic management of a patient presenting for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Incorporating the hypotension prediction index and other hemodynamic parameters to anticipate impending hypotension and treat potential causative factors is an emerging technological advancement. Understanding and embracing the potential for new advanced hemodynamic technology to reduce intraoperative hypotension's severity, duration, and occurrence is key to reducing negative patient outcomes.