Hemoadsorption in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) has been widely used for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in recent years. However, the role of hemoadsorption in ARDS patients requiring VV ECMO is unclear. METHODS: Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to describe the effect of hemoadsorption on outcomes of ARDS patients requiring VV ECMO and elucidate the risk factors for adverse outcomes. We conducted and reported a systematic literature review based on the principles derived from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The systematic review searched Embase, CINHAL, and Pubmed databases for studies on ARDS patients receiving hemoadsorption and VV ECMO. The demographic data, clinical data and biological data of the patients were collected. RESULTS: We ultimately included a total of 8 articles including 189 patients. We characterized the population both clinically and biologically. Our review showed most studies described reductions in inflammatory markers and fluid resuscitation drug dosage in ARDS patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) or sepsis after hemoadsorption. CONCLUSION: Because most of the studies have the characteristics of high heterogeneity, we could only draw very cautious conclusions that hemoadsorption therapy may enhance hemodynamic stability in ARDS patients with COVID-19 or sepsis receiving VV ECMO support. However, our results do not allow us to draw conclusions that hemoadsorption could reduce inflammation and mortality. Prospective randomized controlled studies with a larger sample size are needed in the future to verify the role of hemoadsorption in ARDS patients requiring VV ECMO.

Comparative evaluation of insertion characteristics of PLMA using different techniques in the pediatric age group.

Background and Aims: The laryngeal mask airway ProSeal (PLMA) insertion should be easy, fast, and atraumatic. Most studies have been done on adults who cannot be considered as the reflection of pediatric patients. In this study, we compared the first attempt success rate of three techniques of PLMA insertion: introducer, 90° rotation, and pharyngoscopy technique in the pediatric population. Material and Methods: In this prospective comparative randomized study, a total of 135 patients of American Society of Anesthesiology grade I and II, aged three to eleven years, with normal airways scheduled for elective surgery, were randomly allocated into three groups: introducer, 90° rotation, and pharyngoscopy group. Parameters evaluated were: first attempt insertion success rate, insertion time, ease of insertion score, hemodynamic parameters, oropharyngeal seal pressure, manipulations, PLMA blood staining, postoperative sore throat, and hoarseness. Results: First attempt insertion success rate was higher in the 90° rotation (97.78%) and pharyngoscopy (97.78%) group as compared to the introducer group (93.33%). But the result was not statistically significant. PLMA insertion time was the least in the rotation group, followed by the pharyngoscopy and introducer group (P < 0.0001). Mean arterial pressure and heart rate were significantly raised in the pharyngoscopy versus rotation group and the introducer versus 90° rotation group after PLMA insertion. Oropharyngeal seal pressure was significantly higher in the introducer as compared to the rotation group (P = 0.007). Conclusion: All three techniques had a high first-attempt insertion success rate. As the rotation technique had the best result in insertion time and hemodynamic response, it may be considered a good alternative to pharyngoscopy and introducer technique in pediatric patients of age three to eleven years with a normal airway.

Opioid-sparing anesthesia with dexmedetomidine provides stable hemodynamic and short hospital stay in non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a propensity score matching cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Dexmedetomidine is an alpha-2 agonist with anti-anxiety, sedative, and analgesic effects and causes a lesser degree of respiratory depression. We hypothesized that the use of dexmedetomidine in non-intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) may reduce opioid-related complications such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), dyspnea, constipation, dizziness, skin itching, and cause minimal respiratory depression, and stable hemodynamic status. METHODS: Patients who underwent non-intubated VATS lung wedge resection with propofol combined with dexmedetomidine (group D) or alfentanil (group O) between December 2016 and May 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective propensity score matching cohort study. Intraoperative vital signs, arterial blood gas data, perioperative results and treatment outcomes were analyzed. Of 100 patients included in the study (group D, 50 and group O, 50 patients), group D had a significantly lower degree of decrement in the heart rate and the blood pressure than group O. Intraoperative one-lung arterial blood gas revealed lower pH and significant ETCO2. The common opioid-related side effects, including PONV, dyspnea, constipation, dizziness, and skin itching, all of which occurred more frequently in group O than in group D. Patients in group O had significantly longer postoperative hospital stay and total hospital stay than group D, which might be due to opioid-related side effects postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The application of dexmedetomidine in non-intubated VATS resulted in a significant reduction in perioperative opioid-related complications and maintenance with acceptable hemodynamic performance. These clinical outcomes found in our retrospective study may enhance patient satisfaction and shorten the hospital stay.

Intraoperative Blood Pressure Lability Acts as a Key Mediator in the Impacts of Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy on Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Major Spine Surgery.

Objective Although goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) has been proven to be effective in reducing the incidence of postoperative complications, the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the mediating role of intraoperative hemodynamic lability in the association between GDFT and the incidence of postoperative complications. We further tested the role of this mediation effect using mean arterial pressure, a hemodynamic indicator. Methods This secondary analysis used the dataset of a completed nonrandomized controlled study to investigate the effect of GDFT on the incidence of postoperative complications in patients undergoing posterior spine arthrodesis. We used a simple mediation model to test whether there was a mediation effect of average real variability between the association of GDFT and postoperative complications. We conducted mediation analysis using the mediation package in R (version 3.1.2), based on 5,000 bootstrapped samples, adjusting for covariates. Results Among the 300 patients in the study, 40% (120/300) developed postoperative complications within 30 days. GDFT was associated with fewer 30-day postoperative complications after adjustment for confounders (odds ratio: 0.460, 95% CI: 0.278, 0.761; P = 0.003). The total effect of GDFT on postoperative complications was -0.18 (95% CI: -0.28, -0.07; P < 0.01). The average causal mediation effect was -0.08 (95% CI: -0.15, -0.04; P < 0.01). The average direct effect was -0.09 (95% CI: -0.20, 0.03; P = 0.17). The proportion mediated was 49.9% (95% CI: 18.3%, 140.0%). Conclusions The intraoperative blood pressure lability mediates the relationship between GDFT and the incidence of postoperative complications. Future research is needed to clarify whether actively reducing intraoperative blood pressure lability can prevent postoperative complications.

External validation of a machine learning model to predict hemodynamic instability in intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Early prediction model of hemodynamic instability has the potential to improve the critical care, whereas limited external validation on the generalizability. We aimed to independently validate the Hemodynamic Stability Index (HSI), a multi-parameter machine learning model, in predicting hemodynamic instability in Asian patients. METHOD: Hemodynamic instability was marked by using inotropic, vasopressor, significant fluid therapy, and/or blood transfusions. This retrospective study included among 15,967 ICU patients who aged 20 years or older (not included 20 years) and stayed in ICU for more than 6 h admitted to Taipei Veteran General Hospital (TPEVGH) between January 1, 2010, and March 31, 2020, of whom hemodynamic instability occurred in 3053 patients (prevalence = 19%). These patients in unstable group received at least one intervention during their ICU stays, and the HSI score of both stable and unstable group was calculated in every hour before intervention. The model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and was compared to single indicators like systolic blood pressure (SBP) and shock index. The hemodynamic instability alarm was set by selecting optimal threshold with high sensitivity, acceptable specificity, and lead time before intervention was calculated to indicate when patients were firstly identified as high risk of hemodynamic instability. RESULTS: The AUROC of HSI was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.75-0.77), which performed significantly better than shock Index (0.7; 95% CI, 0.69-0.71) and SBP (0.69; 95% CI, 0.68-0.70). By selecting 0.7 as a threshold, HSI predicted 72% of all 3053 patients who received hemodynamic interventions with 67% in specificity. Time-varying results also showed that HSI score significantly outperformed single indicators even up to 24 h before intervention. And 95% unstable patients can be identified more than 5 h in advance. CONCLUSIONS: The HSI has acceptable discrimination but underestimates the risk of stable patients in predicting the onset of hemodynamic instability in an external cohort.

Impact of Double-Machine Replacement Protocol at Start of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Vasopressor-Dependent Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: When starting continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), vasopressor-dependent patients are at risk of hemodynamic instability. Thus far, only a few studies have analyzed the impact of CRRT circuit replacement for vasopressor-dependent patients. Hence, we compared the effect of double-machine replacement protocol (DMRP) with single-machine replacement protocol (SMRP) for CRRT circuit replacement in vasopressor-dependent patients. METHODS: The medical records of 96 vasopressor-dependent patients treated with CRRT in the general intensive care unit of the Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, between January 2017 and April 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The major measures of the SMRP included returning the blood to the patient and sealing access catheter with heparin and starting a new CRRT machine with a slow blood pump, while DMRP involved simultaneous drawing and return of blood with two machines using a slow blood pump for circuit replacement. The primary outcome measures were changes in vasopressor dose and hemodynamic parameters, and the secondary outcome measure was the pause time difference between the two groups during the period. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were treated with SMRP and 43 patients with DMRP. Heart rate was higher in the SMRP group as compared to the DMRP group (p < 0.05). There were no significant changes in central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure, and vasopressor dose in either group (p > 0.05). The patients in the DMRP group had a significant reduction in CRRT pause time (5.62 ± 0.69 min in DMRP group vs. 37.01 ± 8.72 min in SMRP group, p < 0.01). The DMRP group needed a lower volume of circuit purging and priming fluid related to CRRT circuit replacement (0 mL in DMRP group vs. 463 mL in SMRP group). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the DMRP for CRRT circuit replacement had a slight hemodynamic effect on vasopressor-dependent patients. It also reduced the pause time and volume of circuit purging and priming fluid related to CRRT circuit replacement compared with SMRP.

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) Use in Animal Trauma Models.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) was developed to prevent traumatic exsanguination. We aim to identify the outcomes in animal models with 1) partial versus complete REBOA occlusion and 2) zone 1 versus 2 placements. METHODS: The PRISMA guidelines were followed. We conducted a search of PubMed, EMBASE and Google Scholar for REBOA studies in animal trauma models using the following search terms: "REBOA trauma", "REBOA outcomes" "REBOA complications". SYRCLE's RoB Tool was utilized for the risk of bias and study quality assessment. RESULTS: Our search yielded 14 RCTs for inclusion. Eleven studies directly investigated partial REBOA versus total aortic occlusion. Overall, partial REBOA techniques were associated with similar attainment of proximal MAP but with significantly less ischemic burden. Significant mortality benefit with partial occlusion was observed in three studies. Survival time post-occlusion also was improved with zone 3 placement versus zone 1 (100% versus 33%; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a fine balance between desired proximal arterial pressure and time of occlusion for overall survival and subsequent risk of distal ischemia. Many "partial occlusion" techniques may be superior in attaining such balance over prolonged REBOA inflation where no distal flow is allowed. Tailored zone 3 placement may offer significant mortality and morbidity advantages compared to sustained total occlusion and indiscriminate zone 1 placement strategies. As clear conclusions regarding REBOA are unlikely to be established in animal models, larger randomized investigations utilizing human subjects are needed to describe optimal REBOA technique and applicability in greater detail.

Hemodynamic stability in liver failure patients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange.

INTRODUCTION: The management of liver failure (LF) remains a challenge for the physician. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) improves consciousness level and tends to normalize hyperkinetic circulation by removing neurotoxic substances from the circulation. Hemodynamic stability is essential for optimal patient management. The objective of this study was to observe the effects of TPE on mean arterial pressure (MAP), vasopressor dependency index (VDI) and vasopressor score (VS) in LF patients. METHOD: This retrospective study was conducted on LF patients at a liver institute in Delhi. Clinical data were collected from April 2018 to September 2018. RESULTS: A total of 229 TPEs were performed on 97 patients. Baseline values were MAP 82 (56-141), VS 10.55 (0.00-111.66), and VDI 0.13(0.00-1.44). MAP increased with TPE from 82 to 85 at 1 hour post-TPE and fell back to baseline in 6 hours post-TPE. VDI and VS decreased significantly with TPE till 1 hour post-TPE but reached baseline by 6 hours post-TPE. VDI decreased consistently untill third TPE session and remained stable thereafter. Post-TPE, S. Procalcitonin decreased from 4.69 to 4.25. The average time from admission to start of first TPE procedure was 11 hours in survivors and 26 hours in nonsurvivors. CONCLUSIONS: Patients became hemodynamically stable with TPE but effect did not last long. Sustained improvements in VDI were observed with multiple TPE procedures. Distinct differences were seen between survivors and nonsurvivors in MAP, VDI, and VS early initiation of TPE correlated with improved survival in ALF patients. TPE did not increase risk of sepsis.

A systematic review of the safety and efficacy of non-operative management in patients with high grade liver injury.

INTRODUCTION: The liver is the most frequently damaged organ in blunt abdominal trauma. It is widely accepted that hemodynamically stable patients with low-grade liver trauma should be treated with non-operative management, however there is controversy surrounding its safety and efficacy in high-grade trauma. The purpose of this review is to investigate the role of non-operative management in patients with high-grade liver trauma. METHODS: PubMed and reference lists of PubMed articles were searched to find studies that examined the efficacy of non-operative management in high-grade liver injury patients, and compare it to operative management. Non-operative management was considered successful if rescue surgery was avoided. Outcomes considered were success, mortality, and complication rates. RESULTS: The electronic search revealed 2662 records, 8 of which met the inclusion criteria. All 8 studies contained results suggesting that non-operative management was safe and effective in hemodynamically stable patients with high-grade liver trauma. By combining the outcomes of the different studies, non-operative management had a high success rate of 92.4% (194/210) in high-grade liver trauma patients, which was near the overall 95.0% non-operative management success rate. Non-operative management also had mortality and complication rates of 4.6% (9/194) and 9.7% (7/72) in high-grade injury patients, respectively, compared to operative management's 17.6% (26/148) and 45.5% (5/11). CONCLUSION: Non-operative management of liver trauma is safe and effective in hemodynamically stable patients with high-grade liver injury. It is associated with significantly lower mortality compared with operative management. More studies are required to evaluate complications of non-operative management in high-grade liver injury.

The influence of the infusion of ephedrine and phenylephrine on the hemodynamic stability after subarachnoid anesthesia in senior adults - a controlled randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: We studied the influence of ephedrine or phenylephrine infusion administered immediately after spinal anesthesia (SA) on hemodynamics in elderly orthopedic patients. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. After a subarachnoid injection of 15 mg of levobupivacaine, the participants received an infusion of either ephedrine 20 mg (E group), phenylephrine 250 mcg (P group) or saline (C group) within 30 min. We measured blood pressure, cardiac index (CI) and heart rate (HR) from 15 min before to 30 min after SA. RESULTS: Seventy patients were included in the final analysis. At the end of measurements, mean arterial pressure (MAP) decreased significantly after SA in comparison to the baseline value in the C group but was maintained in the P and E group, with no significant differences between the groups. CI decreased after SA in the C group, was maintained in the P group, and increased significantly in the E group with significant differences between the C and E group (p = 0.049) also between the P and E (p = 0.01) group at the end of measurements. HR decreased significantly after SA in the C and P group but was maintained in the E group, with significant differences between the P and E group (p = 0.033) at the end of measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamic changes after SA in elderly orthopedic patients can be prevented by an immediate infusion of phenylephrine or ephedrine. In addition to maintaining blood pressure, the ephedrine infusion also maintains HR and increases CI after SA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry with registration number ISRCTN44377602, retrospectively registered on 15 June 2017.

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA FOR NEUROSURGERY.

During neurosurgery procedures it is vital to assure optimal cerebral perfusion and oxygenation. Despite physiological autoregulation of brain perfusion, maintaining hemodynamic stability and good oxygenation during anesthesia is vital for success. General anesthesia with mechanical ventilation and current drugs provide excellent hemodynamic condition and it is the first choice for most neurosurgery procedures. However, sometimes it is very hard to avoid brief increase or decrease in blood pressure especially during period of intense pain, or without pain stimulation. This could be detrimental for patients presented with high intracranial pressure and brain edema. Modifying anesthesia depth or treatment with vasoactive drugs usually is needed to overcome such circumstances. On the other hand it is important to wake the patients quickly after anesthesia for neurological exam. That is why regional anesthesia of scalp and spine could show beneficial effects by decreasing pain stimuli and hemodynamic variability with sparing effect of anesthetics drugs. Also regional techniques provide excellent postoperative pain relief, especially after spinal surgery.

Will the presence of radiological signs of tension pneumothorax affect the clinical presentation of primary spontaneous pneumothorax?

INTRODUCTION: Patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) rarely presented with radiological signs of tension pneumothorax on their presenting chest X-ray. Even though, those patients may not develop the hemodynamic instability that is seen in tension pneumothorax. The aim of this study is to elaborate whether the presence of radiological signs of tension pneumothorax in patients with PSP will affect their clinical presentation. METHODS: Retrospective study of all cases of PSP over a period from January 2007 to December 2014. The cases were divided into two groups; tension group includes cases who have radiological signs of tension pneumothorax and non-tension group who do not have those signs. The main outcome was a comparison of the hemodynamic status of both groups. RESULTS: A total of 151 cases of PSP were included in the study. Radiologic signs of tension pneumothorax were identified in 13 cases of the sample. Only one case of the tension group developed hemodynamic instability in the form of desaturation to below 92% with no statistical difference between the two groups in maintaining the hemodynamic status. CONCLUSION: In spite that PSP can be presented with radiological signs of tension pneumothorax, those patients usually maintained their hemodynamic stability. Tension pneumothorax rarely presented as consequence of PSP.

Early fluid loading for septic patients: Any safety limit needed?

Early adequate fluid loading was the corner stone of hemodynamic optimization for sepsis and septic shock. Meanwhile, recent recommended protocol for fluid resuscitation was increasingly debated on hemodynamic stability vs risk of overloading. In recent publications, it was found that a priority was often given to hemodynamic stability rather than organ function alternation in the early fluid resuscitation of sepsis. However, no safety limits were used at all in most of these reports. In this article, the rationality and safety of early aggressive fluid loading for septic patients were discussed. It was concluded that early aggressive fluid loading improved hemodynamics transitorily, but was probably traded off with a follow-up organ function impairment, such as worsening oxygenation by reduction of lung aeration, in a part of septic patients at least. Thus, a safeguard is needed against unnecessary excessive fluids in early aggressive fluid loading for septic patients.

Update on critical care for acute spinal cord injury in the setting of polytrauma.

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) often occurs in patients with concurrent traumatic injuries in other body systems. These patients with polytrauma pose unique challenges to clinicians. The current review evaluates existing guidelines and updates the evidence for prehospital transport, immobilization, initial resuscitation, critical care, hemodynamic stability, diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, and timing appropriate for the patient with SCI who has multisystem trauma. Initial management should be systematic, with focus on spinal immobilization, timely transport, and optimizing perfusion to the spinal cord. There is general evidence for the maintenance of mean arterial pressure of > 85 mm Hg during immediate and acute care to optimize neurological outcome; however, the selection of vasopressor type and duration should be judicious, with considerations for level of injury and risks of increased cardiogenic complications in the elderly. Level II recommendations exist for early decompression, and additional time points of neurological assessment within the first 24 hours and during acute care are warranted to determine the temporality of benefits attributable to early surgery. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis using low-molecular-weight heparin is recommended by current guidelines for SCI. For these patients, titration of tidal volumes is important to balance the association of earlier weaning off the ventilator, with its risk of atelectasis, against the risk for lung damage from mechanical overinflation that can occur with prolonged ventilation. Careful evaluation of infection risk is a priority following multisystem trauma for patients with relative immunosuppression or compromise. Although patients with polytrauma may experience longer rehabilitation courses, long-term neurological recovery is generally comparable to that in patients with isolated SCI after controlling for demographics. Bowel and bladder disorders are common following SCI, significantly reduce quality of life, and constitute a focus of targeted therapies. Emerging biomarkers including glial fibrillary acidic protein, S100ß, and microRNAs for traumatic SCIs are presented. Systematic management approaches to minimize sources of secondary injury are discussed, and areas requiring further research, implementation, and validation are identified.

Successful Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure Due to Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis With Low Dose Tolvaptan in Elderly Patients.

Medical therapy for severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) is necessary for inoperable patients due to comorbid conditions. Tolvaptan (TLV), unlike other diuretics, resulted in modest changes in filling pressures associated with an increase in urine output, suggesting that TLV improves congestive heart failure (CHF) due to severe AS without hemodynamic instability.We retrospectively investigated 14 consecutive patients ≥ 80 years of age admitted due to decompensated CHF with severe AS at Juntendo University Hospital from April 2014 to November 2015. Seven of the 14 patients were treated with TLV. We examined the safety and efficacy of TLV treatment for severe AS.Mean age was 90.0 ± 6.3 years and mean aortic valve area was 0.57 ± 0.22 cm2. Urine volume at day 1 of TLV treatment was increased and urine osmolality significantly decreased at day 1 of TLV treatment (all P < 0.05). New York Heart Association classification and brain natriuretic peptide levels significantly improved 1 week after treatment and at discharge (all P < 0.05) whereas brain natriuretic peptide levels did not improve in the patients without TLV. Severe adverse events did not occur during TLV treatment. During the first 3 days, blood pressure and heart rate were relatively stable. TLV treatment did not affect serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, or the estimated glomerular filtration rate.In elderly patients with severe AS, TLV treatment improved CHF without hemodynamic instability. Further prospective studies are needed to assess the safety and efficacy of TLV in decompensated heart failure due to severe AS.

[Complications in the conservative managemennt of splenic rupture]. / Complicaciones en el tratamiento conservador del traumatismo esplénico.

INTRODUCTION: Management of splenic rupture in haemodynamically stable children is non-surgical treatment. However, complications can occur during follow-up. Objective: to study the frequency, evolution and treatment of complications of conservative treatment of splenic rupture. Secondary objective: to evaluate the results of the American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) clinical guideline in conservative treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with abdominal trauma between 2010-2016. We included children under 15 years of age with splenic injury after blunt abdominal trauma. Demographic variables, mechanism and degree of injury of American Association for the Surgery of Trauma were studied in the sample. The complications, the time of onset and their treatment were analyzed. The treatment was based on the recommendations of the APSA with the exception of ultrasound follow-up. In case of complications and according to the clinical and characteristics, embolization was indicated. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were attended, 21 males (75%). The median age was 8.35 years (6.28-11.35). Seven patients (25%) presented complications: two arteriovenous fistula (AVF), three pseudo-aneurysms and two hemorrhages. The median time to diagnosis of complications was 5.67 days (P25 4- P75 5.75). Embolization was performed in two patients with pseudo-aneurysm. Another patient underwent emergency splenectomy for rebleeding. The rest of the complications resolved spontaneously. CONCLUSIONS: In splenic rupture, unlike APSA, ultrasound monitoring is useful to rule out early complications.

INTRODUCCION: El manejo estándar de las lesiones esplénicas en pacientes hemodinámicamente estables es el tratamiento no quirúrgico. Sin embargo, durante el seguimiento pueden surgir complicaciones. Objetivo: estudiar la frecuencia, evolución y tratamiento de las complicaciones del tratamiento conservador del traumatismo esplénico. Objetivo secundario: evaluar los resultados de la guía clínica de la American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) en el tratamiento conservador. MATERIAL Y METODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes con traumatismo abdominal entre 2010-2016. Se incluyeron menores de 15 años con lesión esplénica tras un traumatismo abdominal cerrado. En la muestra se estudiaron variables demográficas, mecanismo y grado de lesión según la American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Se analizaron las complicaciones, el tiempo de aparición y su tratamiento. El tratamiento se fundamentó en las recomendaciones de la APSA a excepción del seguimiento ecográfico. En caso de aparición de complicaciones y en función de la clínica y de las características se indicó tratamiento con embolización. RESULTADOS: Se atendieron 28 pacientes, 21 varones (75%). La mediana de edad fue 8,35 años (6,28-11,35). Siete pacientes (25%) presentaron complicaciones: dos fístulas arteriovenosas (FAV), tres pseudoaneurismas y dos hemorragias. La media de tiempo para el diagnóstico de las complicaciones fue de 5,67 días. En dos pacientes con pseudoaneurisma se realizó embolización. Un paciente fue sometido a esplenectomía de urgencia por resangrado. El resto de complicaciones se resolvieron espontáneamente. CONCLUSIONES: En el traumatismo esplénico, a diferencia de la APSA, el seguimiento ecográfico en pacientes con lesiones de alto grado es útil para descartar complicaciones de forma precoz.

Open surgery (OS) versus endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for hemodynamically stable and unstable ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA).

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is an alternative treatment for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) in hemodynamically (hd) stable patients. Treatment for patients with hd-unstable rAAA remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of EVAR and open surgery (OS) in hd-stable and hd-unstable rAAA patients using meta-analysis. The first part of this study included 48 articles that reported the treatment outcomes of rAAA managed with EVAR (n = 9610) and OS (n = 93867). The second part, which is the focus of this study, included 5 out of 48 articles, which further reported treatment results in hd-stable (n = 198) and hd-unstable (n = 185) patients. When heterogeneity among the groups was observed, a random-effects model was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (OR) or in cases of non-heterogeneity, a fixed-effects model analysis was employed. In the first part of this study, the in-hospital mortality rate was found to be lower in the EVAR group than in the OS group (29.9 vs 40.8 %; OR 0.59; 95 % CI 0.52-0.66; P < 0.01). In the second part of this study, 383 patients from 5 articles were included: 152 patients were treated by EVAR, and 231 were treated by OS. The total mortality was 147/383 (38.4 %), while the mortality of the EVAR group and the OS group was 25.7 % (39/152) and 46.8 % (108/231), respectively. In the hd-stable group, the in-hospital mortality after EVAR was significantly lower than that after OS [18.9 % (18/95) vs 28.2 % (29/103); OR 0.47; 95 % CI 0.22-0.97; P = 0.04]. For the hd-unstable rAAA patients, the in-hospital mortality after EVAR was significantly lower than that after OS [36.8 % (21/57) vs 61.7 % (79/128); OR 0.40; 95 % CI 0.20-0.79; P < 0.01]. This study indicated that compared with OS, EVAR in hd-unstable rAAA patients is associated with improved outcomes. Available publications are currently limited; thus, the best treatment strategy for this subgroup of patients remains unclear. Further clinical studies are needed to provide more detailed data, such as the shock index and long-term results.

Comparison of an Intraoperative Infusion of Dexmedetomidine, Fentanyl, and Remifentanil on Perioperative Hemodynamics, Sedation Quality, and Postoperative Pain Control.

We aimed to compare fentanyl, remifentanil and dexmedetomidine with respect to hemodynamic stability, postoperative pain control and achievement of sedation at the postanesthetic care unit (PACU). In this randomized double-blind study, 90 consecutive total laparoscopic hysterectomy patients scheduled for elective surgery were randomly assigned to receive fentanyl (1.0 µg/kg) over 1 minute followed by a 0.4 µg/kg/hr infusion (FK group, n = 30), or remifentanil (1.0 µg/kg) over 1 minute followed by a 0.08 µg/kg/min infusion (RK group, n = 30), or dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg) over 10 minutes followed by a 0.5 µg/kg/hr infusion (DK group, n = 30) initiating at the end of main procedures of the operation to the time in the PACU. A single dose of intravenous ketorolac (30 mg) was given to all patients at the end of surgery. We respectively evaluated the pain VAS scores, the modified OAA/S scores, the BIS, the vital signs and the perioperative side effects to compare the efficacy of fentanyl, remifentanil and dexmedetomidine. Compared with other groups, the modified OAA/S scores were significantly lower in DK group at 0, 5 and 10 minutes after arrival at the PACU (P < 0.05), whereas the pain VAS and BIS were not significantly different from other groups. The blood pressure and heart rate in the DK group were significantly lower than those of other groups at the PACU (P < 0.05). DK group, at sedative doses, had the better postoperative hemodynamic stability than RK group or FK group and demonstrated a similar effect of pain control as RK group and FK group with patient awareness during sedation in the PACU. (World Health Organization registry, KCT0001524).

Acute hemodynamic response and uremic toxin removal in conventional and extended hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration: a randomized crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Intensive hemodialysis (HD) may have significant benefits. Recently, the role of extended hemodiafiltration (HDF) has gained interest. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute effects of extended HD and HDF on hemodynamic response and solute removal. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized crossover trial. SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS: Stable patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing conventional HD. INTERVENTION: 13 patients randomly completed a single study of 4-hour HD (HD4), 4-hour HDF (HDF4), 8-hour HD (HD8), and 8-hour HDF (HDF8), with a 2-week interval between study sessions. Between study sessions, patients received routine conventional HD treatments. OUTCOMES: Acute hemodynamic effects and uremic toxin clearance. MEASUREMENTS: Blood pressure and heart rate, pulse wave analysis, cardiac output, and microvascular density by sublingual capillaroscopy, as well as relative blood volume and thermal variables, were measured. Clearance and removal of uremic toxins also were studied. RESULTS: Long treatments showed more stability of peripheral systolic blood pressure (change during HD4, -21.7±15.6 mm Hg; during HDF4, -23.3±20.8 mm Hg; during HD8, -6.7±15.2 mm Hg [P=0.04 vs. HD4; P=0.08 vs. HDF4]; and during HDF8, -0.5±14.4 mm Hg [P=0.004 vs. HD4; P=0.008 vs. HDF4]). A similar observation was found for peripheral diastolic and central blood pressures. Cardiac output remained more stable in extended sessions (change during HD4, -1.4±1.5 L/min; during HDF4, -1.6±1.0 L/min; during HD8, -0.4±0.9 L/min [P=0.02 vs. HDF4]; and during HDF8, -0.5±0.8 L/min [P=0.06 vs. HD4; P=0.03 vs. HDF4), in line with the decreased relative blood volume slope in long dialysis. No differences in microvascular density were found. Energy transfer rates were comparable (HD4, 13.3±4.7 W; HDF4, 16.2±5.6 W; HD8, 14.2±6.0 W; and HDF8, 14.5±4.3 W). Small-molecule and phosphate removal were superior during long treatments. ß2-Microglobulin and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23) reduction ratios were highest in HDF8. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, only acute effects were studied. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment time, and not modality, was the determinant for the hemodynamic response. HDF significantly improved removal of middle molecules, with superior results in extended HDF.