RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Hepatic sclerosing hemangiomas are rare tumors whose appearance on imaging is similar to that of malignant tumors. The resulting difficulties in preoperative diagnosis frequently lead to surgical resection in order to accurately identify the tumor. CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old man was diagnosed with multiple gastric carcinoid tumors (T1N1M0, pStage IIIB) after total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection. Enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen 2 years after the initial surgery revealed a novel solid lesion with ring enhancement measuring 22 × 15 mm at S5 of the liver. Metachronous liver metastasis from multiple gastric carcinoid tumors was suspected, and partial hepatectomy of S5 was successfully performed. Histopathological diagnosis was sclerosing hemangioma with no malignant findings. DISCUSSION: Ours is the first reported case of a newly appearing sclerosing hemangioma excised and diagnosed histopathologically. Hepatic sclerosing hemangiomas are rarely observed, but they are often resected under a preoperative diagnosis of malignant lesion due to the similarity on imaging studies. CONCLUSION: Surgeons must consider that a hepatic tumor may be a sclerosing hemangioma, particularly when the lesion appears to be ring enhanced.
RESUMO
Hepatic sclerosing hemangioma is a rare benign disease that occurs in association with hepatic cavernous hemangioma degeneration and sclerosis. Recent studies have shown that radiofrequency (RF) ablation is an alternative treatment for hepatic cavernous hemangiomas, even for large hemangiomas (≥10 cm). However, RF ablation might not be suitable to treat large sclerosing hemangiomas. We herein report the successful surgical removal of a large hepatic sclerosing hemangioma after RF ablation treatment failure in a 65-year-old man. In conclusion, we suggest that resection should be chosen as a first-line therapy for the disease.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Hepatic sclerosing hemangioma is a very rare benign tumor, characterized by fibrosis and hyalinization occurring in association with degeneration of a hepatic cavernous hemangioma. We report here a rare case of multiple hepatic sclerosing hemangioma mimicking metastatic liver tumor that was successfully treated using laparoscopic surgery. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 67-year-old woman with multiple liver tumors underwent single-incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy under a diagnosis of advanced sigmoid cancer with multiple liver metastases. Examination of surgical specimens of sigmoid colon revealed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma invading the serosa, and no lymph node metastases. Serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 remained within normal limits throughout the course. Two months after sigmoidectomy, the patient underwent laparoscopic partial hepatectomy of S1 and S6 of the liver and cholecystectomy. Histopathological examination showed that the tumors mainly comprised hyalinized tissue and collagen fibers with sporadic vascular spaces on hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections, yielding a diagnosis of multiple hepatic sclerosing hemangioma. No evidence of recurrence has been seen as of 21 months postoperatively. DISCUSSION: Differentiating multiple sclerosing hemangiomas from metastatic liver tumors was quite difficult because the radiological findings were closely compatible with liver metastases. Laroscopic hepatectomy provided less blood loss, a shorter duration of hospitalization, and good cosmetic results. CONCLUSION: Sclerosing hemangioma should be included among the differential diagnoses of multiple liver tumors in patients with colorectal cancer. Laparoscopic hepatectomy is useful for diagnostic therapy for undiagnosed multiple liver tumors.