United States Drug Allergy Registry (USDAR) grading scale for immediate drug reactions.

BACKGROUND: There is no accepted grading system classifying the severity of immediate reactions to drugs. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to present a proposed grading system developed through the consensus of drug allergy experts from the United States Drug Allergy Registry (USDAR) Consortium. METHODS: The USDAR investigators sought to develop a consensus severity grading system for immediate drug reactions that is applicable to clinical care and research. RESULTS: The USDAR grading scale scores severity levels on a scale of 0 to 4. A grade of no reaction (NR) is used for patients who undergo challenge without any symptoms or signs, and it would confirm a negative challenge result. A grade 0 reaction is indicative of primarily subjective complaints that are commonly seen with both historical drug reactions and during drug challenges, and it would suggest a low likelihood of a true drug allergic reaction. Grades 1 to 4 meet the criteria for a positive challenge result and may be considered indicative of a drug allergy. Grade 1 reactions are suggestive of a potential immediate drug reaction with mild symptoms. Grade 2 reactions are more likely to be immediate drug reactions of moderate severity. Grade 3 reactions have features suggestive of a severe allergic reaction, whereas grade 4 reactions are life-threatening reactions such as anaphylactic shock and fatal anaphylaxis. CONCLUSION: This proposed grading schema for immediate drug reactions improves on prior schemata by being developed specifically for immediate drug reactions and being easy to implement in clinical and research practice.

[Prehospital care of anaphylactic reactions by the air rescue and ground-based emergency services Dresden : An analysis of treatment and outcome]. / Präklinische Versorgung von anaphylaktischen Reaktionen durch die Dresdner Luft- und Bodenrettung : Analyse von Therapie und Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis can lead to a life-threatening situation. Therefore, rapid diagnosis and emergency treatment is indicated. Immediate treatment with intramuscular adrenaline (or intravascularly with sufficient medical expertise) in anaphylaxis with cardiovascular and/or respiratory symptoms is recommended by various guidelines. Previous studies have shown that anaphylaxis is often not treated according to guidelines and that adrenaline in particular is rarely administered. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the data on emergency treatment and outcomes of patients with anaphylaxis by the air rescue and ground-based emergency services Dresden. Moreover, the results of the air- and ground-based services were compared. The focus was on administration of adrenaline and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the ground-based emergency service Dresden (from 2012 to 2016) and the air rescue service Dresden (from 2008 to 2015) related to anaphylactic reactions were analyzed retrospectively. The severity of the anaphylaxis, the emergency medication administered, further monitoring, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Data from 152 adults/29 children were analyzed for air rescue and 1131 adults/223 children for the ground-based emergency service. Adults with grade II-IV anaphylaxis received adrenaline in 19% (air rescue) and 7% (ground rescue) of cases. Children with grade II-IV anaphylaxis received adrenaline in 7% (air rescue) and 8% (ground rescue) of cases. Immediate drug therapy led to an improvement in general condition in 96-98% (air rescue) and 72-77% (ground-based emergency service) of cases. A significant correlation was found between the administration of adrenaline and the improvement in outcome in the ground-based emergency cohort. CONCLUSION: Guideline-compliant first-line therapy with adrenaline was not performed in the majority of the cases analyzed in this study. The significant effect of adrenaline on outcome demonstrated in this study emphases the need to improve the emergency treatment of anaphylactic reactions.

Non-immediate hypersensitivity reactions to iomeprol: Diagnostic value of skin tests and cross-reactivity with other iodinated contrast media.

BACKGROUND: Iodinated contrast media produce non-immediate hypersensitivity reactions (NIHR). The goal of this prospective study was to determine the utility of skin tests and the subsequent tolerance to negative skin-tested iodinated contrasts in patients with NIHR caused by iomeprol. METHODS: Prick and intradermal tests with iomeprol, iopamidol, iopromide, and iobitridol were performed in all patients. IV challenge with the causative contrast (iomeprol in 90%) was made if skin tests were negative. In case of a positive skin test with the causal contrast, or a positive challenge test with it, IV challenge test with an alternative, negative skin-tested contrast was performed in all patients. RESULTS: Skin tests were positive in 47.6% (20/42) of patients with NIHR induced by iomeprol. Of the 66 challenge tests performed with negative skin-tested iodinated contrasts, tolerance was confirmed in 35 (53%): 32 iomeron, 2 iobitridol, 1 iopamidol. Cross-reactivity between iomeprol and iopamidol was 22% (4/20 in patients with positive skin tests and 5/21 in patients with negative skin tests). CONCLUSIONS: Sensitivity of the skin tests was less than 50% NIHRs due to iomeprol, while the negative predictive value of skin tests in patients who tolerated challenges with alternative contrasts (mainly iopamidol) was 53% (35 tolerated out of 66 performed). The cross-reactivity between iomeprol and iopamidol is high.

Agreement of a clinical scoring system with allergic anaphylaxis in suspected perioperative hypersensitivity reactions: prospective validation of a new tool.

BACKGROUND: A clinical scoring system to estimate the likelihood that a reaction represents a perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reaction has been devised using a Delphi consensus process. Agreement of this clinical scoring system with the outcome of allergological assessment would allow the use of this tool in post-resuscitation and subsequent management of suspected perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reaction and potentially as a new standard reference for clinical investigations. METHODS: We prospectively scored 301 cases of suspected perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reaction according to the Hypersensitivity Clinical Scoring Scheme. Classification of cases was by allergological workup based on immediate and delayed investigations. The discrimination and calibration of the Hypersensitivity Clinical Scoring Scheme was compared with results from an expert panel of allergologists, skin testing, mast cell tryptase ratios, and specific IgE assays, as was agreement by Cohen's kappa coefficient. RESULTS: The Hypersensitivity Clinical Scoring Scheme predicted cases of allergic perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reaction with comparable discrimination to an expert panel, mast cell tryptase formula, and specific IgE assays in anaphylaxis to neuromuscular blocking drugs. Using a score threshold of 15 or greater to indicate allergic perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reaction, the sensitivity was 88.9%, with a specificity of 79.4%. Prospectively, the Hypersensitivity Clinical Scoring Scheme correctly classified a greater number of subjects than the expert panel and the optimal post hoc binary logistic regression model (86% vs 85% vs 84%), however it was inferior to skin testing. CONCLUSION: The Hypersensitivity Clinical Scoring Scheme predicts allergic perioperative immediate hypersensitivity using features of the acute syndrome. This approach could guide algorithms for the post-resuscitative management of suspected perioperative immediate hypersensitivity, and identify patients requiring drug provocation challenge.

Drug Allergy and Cutaneous Adverse Reactions.

Allergy or hypersensitivity to drugs often affects the skin and sometimes also mucosa. While immediate type reactions show a rather homogeneous pattern, delayed type reactions reveal a high variability. In both cases it may not always be easy to differentiate drug reactions from non-drug-induced skin conditions. Furthermore, the different types of cutaneous adverse reactions may be difficult to distinguish in the beginning. This accounts predominately for delayed hypersensitivity reactions that can occur after a variety of medications and present with manifold lesions. Most of these cutaneous adverse reactions are mild, but some are severe with high morbidity and mortality. In the clinical setting, it is important to recognize the signs that point to a more severe condition early on in order to initiate appropriate management. In addition, it is crucial to identify the potentially culprit medication on the basis of a detailed medication history and by evaluating the relevant exposure times of certain drugs that differ substantially between the various reaction types. After the acute stage of the adverse reaction is managed successfully, further allergologic testing may be undertaken to confirm the offending drug.

Validation of an app-based portable spirometer in adolescents with asthma.

OBJECTIVES: Objective measurements of asthma impairment could aid teens in recognition of changes in asthma status over time. Ready access to a conventional spirometer is not realistic outside of the clinical setting. In this proof-of-concept study, we compared the performance of the VitalFlo mobile spirometer to the nSpire KoKo® sx1000 spirometer for accuracy in measuring Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in adolescents with asthma. METHODS: Two hundred forty pulmonary function measurements were collected from 48 adolescents with persistent asthma from the University of North Carolina's pediatric allergy and pulmonology subspecialty clinics. Participants performed spirometry with the nSpireKoKo® sx1000 spirometer and the VitalFlo spirometer during their clinic visits. 119 simulated FVC maneuvers were conducted on both devices to standardize measurements. Pearson correlations, Bland-Altman procedure, and two-sample comparison tests were performed to assess the relationship between the two spirometers. RESULTS: VitalFlo measurements were significantly highly correlated with nSpireKoKo® spirometer values for FEV1, (r2=0.721, [95% CI, 0.749 ± 0.120], P < 0.001) and moderately for FVC (r2= 0.617, [95% CI, 0.640 ± 0.130], P < 0.001) measurements. There were no statistically significant differences of the mean FEV1 (M = 0.00764, SD = 0.364, t(59)=0.16, P = 0.87) and FVC measurements (M = 0.00261, SD = 0.565, t(59)=0.036, P = 0.97.) between the VitalFlo and nSpireKoKo® systems. Both devices demonstrated significantly high correlation when comparing the automated FVC (r2 = 0.997, [95% CI, 1.00 ± 0.00974], P < 0.001) measurements. Bland-Altman plots did not demonstrate significant bias between devices for both FEV1 (0.00764 L) and FVC (0.00261 L) measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Lung function measurements from the VitalFlo mobile spirometer were comparable to a commercially-available spirometer commonly used in clinical settings. This validated app-based spirometer for home use has the potential to improve asthma self-management.

Immunological response and clinical profile in patients with recurrent dermatophytosis.

BACKGROUND: An alarming increase in the number of patients with chronic and recurrent dermatophytosis has invoked the need to study the immunological parameters of the host. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate delayed type of hypersensitivity (DTH) response and immediate hypersensitivity (IH) response by flow cytometry evaluation of immune cells from peripheral blood and intradermal trichophyton skin test in patients with recurrent dermatophytosis. METHODS: A hundred patients with recurrent dermatophytosis and 50 controls (healthy controls and acute dermatophytosis controls) were included. Relevant risk factors for recurrence were analysed, and serum IgE levels were estimated. Flow cytometry evaluation of immune cells in peripheral blood and intradermal trichophyton skin test was done. Dermatophyte pathogens were isolated, and antifungal susceptibility was performed. RESULTS: Trichophyton mentagrophytes complex (95.84%) and T. rubrum (4.16%) were isolated in culture. Serum IgE was elevated in 83.15% cases (p = .01). IFN-γ+ cells (p = .0501, p = .0001, p = .0014), Th1 cells (p = .1197, p = .0024, p = .0169), IL-17+ cells (p = .0127, p = .0006, p = .0007) and Th17 cells (p = .0634, p = .0001, p = .0054) were reduced, and IL-4+ cells (p = .0108, p = .0175, p = .0018) were increased in cases. Intradermal test demonstrated negative DTH response in all cases (p < .001, p < .001, p < .001), strongly positive IH response in 6%, and borderline positive IH response in 85% cases (p = .018, p < .001, p < .001). Topical corticosteroids application, undergarment types (tight fit), poor frequency of washing clothes, family history of tinea, sharing of towels were significant risk factors for recurrent dermatophytosis. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced IFN-γ+ , Th1, IL-17+ and Th17 cells population along with impaired DTH response by the intradermal test was observed in patients with recurrent dermatophytosis.

Characterization of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid specific T-cell clones from patients with immediate drug hypersensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Betalactam (BL) antibiotics are the most common cause of drug hypersensitivity. Amoxicillin (AX), which is often prescribed alongside clavulanic acid (Clav), is the most common elicitor. The aim of this study was to determine whether AX and Clav-responsive T-cells are detectable in patients with immediate hypersensitivity to AX-Clav, to assess whether these T-cells display the same specificity as that detected in skin and provocation testing, and to explore T-cell activation pathways. METHODS: Drug-specific T-cell clones were generated from immediate hypersensitive patients´ blood by serial dilution and repetitive mitogen stimulation. Antigen specificity was assessed by measurement of proliferation and cytokine release. CD4+ /CD8+ phenotype and chemokine receptor expression were analyzed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: 110 AX-specific and 96 Clav-specific T-cell clones were generated from seven patients with positive skin test to either AX or Clav. Proliferation of AX- and Clav-specific clones was dose-dependent, and no cross-reactivity was observed. AX- and Clav-specific clones required antigen-presenting cells to proliferate, and drugs were presented to CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells by MHC class-II and I, respectively. A higher secretion of IL-13 and IL-5 was detected in presence of the culprit drug compared with the alternative drug. Clones expressed CD69, CCR4, CXCR3, and CCR10. CONCLUSIONS: Our study details the antigen specificity and phenotype of T-cell clones generated from patients with AX-Clav-induced immediate hypersensitivity diagnosed by positive skin test. AX- and Clav-specific clones were generated from patients irrespective of whether AX or Clav was the culprit, although differences in cytokine secretion were observed.

Immediate Hypersensitivity Reactions Caused by Drug Excipients: A Literature Review.

The European Medicines Agency defines excipients as the constituents of a pharmaceutical form apart from the active substance. Immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHRs) caused by excipients contained in the formulation of medications have been described. However, there are no data on the prevalence of IHRs due to drug excipients. Clinical manifestations of allergy to excipients can range from skin disorders to life-threatening systemic reactions. The aim of this study was to review the literature on allergy to pharmaceutical excipients and to record the IHRs described with various types of medications, specifically reactions due to the excipients contained in their formulations. The cases reported were sorted alphabetically by type of medication and excipient in order to obtain a list of the excipients most frequently involved for each type of medication.

Anaesthetic management of patients with pre-existing allergic conditions: a narrative review.

This narrative review seeks to distinguish the clinical patterns of pre-existing allergic conditions from other confounding non-allergic clinical entities, and to identify the potential related risks and facilitate their perioperative management. Follow-up investigation should be performed after a perioperative immediate hypersensitivity to establish a diagnosis and provide advice for subsequent anaesthetics, the main risk factor for perioperative immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated anaphylaxis being a previous uninvestigated perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reaction. The concept of cross-reactivity between drugs used in the perioperative setting and food is often quoted, but usually not supported by evidence. There is no reason to avoid propofol in egg, soy, or peanut allergy. The allergenic determinants have been characterised for fish, shellfish, and povidone iodine, but remain unknown for iodinated contrast agents. Iodinated drugs may be used in seafood allergy. Evidence supporting the risk for protamine allergy in fish allergy and in neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin use is lacking. Conversely, cross-reactivity to gelatin-based colloid may occur in α-gal syndrome. Atopy and allergic asthma along with other non-allergic conditions, such as NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease, chronic urticaria, mastocytosis, and hereditary or acquired angioedema, are not risk factors for IgE-mediated drug allergy, but there is a perioperative risk associated with the potential for exacerbation of the various conditions.

Short and extended provocation tests have similar negative predictive value in non-immediate hypersensitivity to beta-lactams in children.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Drug provocation tests (DPTs) are the gold-standard method to diagnose non-immediate hypersensitivity reactions (NIHSR) to beta-lactam antibiotics (BL) in children. Our aim was to compare the negative predictive value (NPV) of one-day (short) DPT versus 3-7 days (extended) DPT for the diagnosis of NIHSR to BL in paediatric age. A secondary aim was to compare confidence on drug re-exposure after short and extended negative DPTs. METHODS: The occurrence of HSR on drug re-exposure and drug refusal after negative diagnostic DPTs were evaluated in children/adolescents with a history of NIHSR to BL using a questionnaire performed six months to ten years after DPT. Patients were divided into two groups according to the protocol performed: short DPT vs. extended DPT. RESULTS: We enrolled 212 children and adolescents (86 females, 126 males, mean age at DPT 5.52 years, p25=3 years, p75=7.25 years): 69 tested with short DPT, and 143 with extended DPT. The NPV of both types of DPT together was 95.2%. The NPV of short DPT was 97.5% and the NPV of extended DPT was 93.8% (p=0.419). After negative DPT, beta-lactams were refused by carers in 14.75% of the children requiring subsequent treatment, 6.98% in the short DPT group and 18.99% in the extended DPT group (p=0.074). CONCLUSIONS: In our paediatric sample, prolonging drug administration did not increase the NPV of diagnostic DPT for NIHSR to BL or reduce drug refusal. Altogether, the data here reported suggest that, however intuitive, prolonging DPT is not beneficial in the parameters analysed.

[Severe immediate hypersensitivity reaction with generalized contact urticaria after cutaneous application of topical permethrin]. / Réaction d'hypersensibilité immédiate sévère avec urticaire de contact généralisée secondaire à l'application cutanée de perméthrine topique.

BACKGROUND: Permethrin is a synthetic pyrethroid used as a chemical insecticide that obtained an MA in the management of human scabies in 2014. We report a case of severe immediate hypersensitivity (IH) reaction with generalized contact urticaria secondary to the cutaneous application of 5% permethrin cream (Topiscab®). OBSERVATION: A 44-year-old woman with no personal history of atopy was treated with oral ivermectin, Topiscab® and levocetirizine for suspected scabies. Eight hours after taking a levocetirizine tablet and five hours after the application of a tube of Topiscab® together with oral ivermectin, she presented generalized urticaria, nausea and diarrhoea, followed by loss of consciousness. Skin prick-tests for ivermectin and levocetirizine were negative. We noticed non-significant erythema with permethrin. The open application test with Topiscab® was strongly positive at 20min with the appearance of an urticaria plaque in the area of application. The open test with sorbic acid was positive at 2h. Accidental exposure to permethrin spray caused dyspnoea and recurrence of urticaria. DISCUSSION: Mild and transient symptoms are regularly described after cutaneous application (burning, paraesthesia or increased itching). Delayed hypersensitivity reactions such as contact dermatitis have been reported in the literature. Exceptional cases of severe IH reactions have been described following occupational exposure to airborne pyrethroid insecticides. No cases of severe IH reaction secondary to application of topical permethrin have been reported.

Immediate hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine.

Chlorhexidine is a widely used and effective antiseptic agent. Although skin contact is usually well tolerated, it may cause both immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions. We report a case of immediate hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine causing both skin and respiratory symptoms following occupational exposure to chlorhexidine in a health-care worker.

Successful rapid subcutaneous desensitization to anakinra in a case with a severe immediate-type hypersensitivity reaction.

Summary: Anakinra, one of the novel biological agents, is a recombinant human IL-1 receptor antagonist. It is preferred as an alternative drug for familial Mediterranean fever cases where colchicine is not sufficient or cannot be used due to its side effects. Like all other biologics, hypersensitivity reactions to anakinra are quite rare. This is the first case which was successfully desensitized with anakinra after a severe immediate-type hypersensitivity reaction.

A Mouse Model of Anaphylaxis and Atopic Dermatitis to Salt-Soluble Wheat Protein Extract.

BACKGROUND: Wheat allergy and other immune-mediated disorders triggered by wheat proteins are growing at an alarming rate for reasons not well understood. A mouse model to study hypersensitivity responses to salt-soluble wheat protein (SSWP) extract is currently unavailable. Here we tested the hypothesis that SSWP extract from wheat will induce sensitization as well as allergic disease in mice. METHODS: Female BALB/cJ mice were weaned onto a plant protein-free diet. The mice were injected a total of 4 times with an SSWP (0.01 mg/mouse) fraction extracted from durum wheat along with alum as an adjuvant. Blood was collected biweekly and SSWP-specific IgE (SIgE) and total IgE (TIgE) levels were measured using ELISA. Systemic anaphylaxis upon intraperitoneal injection with SSWP was quantified by hypothermia shock response (HSR). Mucosal mast cell degranulation was measured by the elevation of mMCP-1 in the blood. The mice were monitored for dermatitis. Skin tissues were used in histopathology and for measuring cytokine/chemokine/adhesion molecule levels using a protein microarray system. RESULTS: Injection with SSWP resulted in time-dependent SIgE antibody responses associated with the elevation of TIgE concentration. Challenge with SSWP elicited severe HSR that correlated with a significant elevation of plasma mMCP-1 levels. Sensitized mice developed facial dermatitis associated with mast cell degranulation. Lesions expressed significant elevation of Th2/Th17/Th1 cytokines and chemokines and E-selectin adhesion molecule. CONCLUSION: Here we report a mouse model of anaphylaxis and atopic dermatitis to SSWP extract that may be used for further basic and applied research on wheat allergy.

[Anaphylactic reactions to vaccines : Chicken egg allergy and the influenza H1N1 vaccination]. / Anaphylaktische Reaktionen auf Impfstoffe : Hühnereiweißallergie und Influenza-H1N1­Impfung.

BACKGROUND: Allergic reactions to influenza vaccinations are a well-known phenomenon; however, only a few published statistics give information on the risks. Patients with a chicken egg allergy must be particularly carefully handled during an influenza epidemic where vaccines produced using embryonated chicken eggs are primarily employed. METHODS: A selective literature review and analysis of the problem of allergic reactions to vaccinations was performed. RESULTS: The two most common relative contraindications among patients to be vaccinated are the presence of an egg allergy and a previous anaphylactic reaction to vaccination. These patients have a significantly increased risk of sustaining an adverse reaction. These high-risk patients should therefore only be vaccinated on the basis of thorough assessment of medical history, and then only with caution. The emergency routine must include sufficient precautionary measures, in case an anaphylactic reaction occurs. CONCLUSION: Current guidelines for the treatment of anaphylactic reactions are to be observed. Immediate treatment of the first symptoms of an anaphylactic reaction-i.v. administration of adrenalin, antihistamines, cortisone, and in some cases betamimetics-can usually prevent anaphylactic shock. Alternatively, a graded vaccination ("split protocol") and overnight surveillance can be considered in this group of patients.

Non-immediate hypersensitivity reactions to beta-lactam antibiotics in children - our 10-year experience in allergy work-up.

BACKGROUND: Non-immediate reactions to beta-lactam antibiotics (BL) occur more than one hour after drug administration, and the most common manifestations are maculopapular exanthemas and delayed-appearing urticaria and/or angioedema. Infections can lead to skin eruptions and mimic drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR), if a drug is taken at the same time. The most of children are labeled as 'drug allergic' after considering only the clinical history. OBJECTIVE: To diagnose/detect a hypersensitivity or an infection which mimic DHR in children with non-immediate reactions to BL METHODS: A prospective survey was conducted in a group of 1026 children with histories of non-immediate reactions to BL by performing patch tests, skin tests, and in case of negative results, drug provocation tests (DPTs). In 300 children, a study was performed to detect infections by viruses or Mycoplasma pneumoniae. RESULTS: Urticaria and maculopapular exanthemas were the most reported non-immediate reactions. Only 76 (7.4%) of 1026 children had confirmed non-immediate hypersensitivity reactions to BL. Fifty-seven children had positive delayed-reading intradermal tests (18 of these with a positive patch test). Nineteen children had positive DPT. Sixty-six of 300 children had positive tests for viruses or Mycoplasma pneumoniae and 2 of them had a positive allergy work-up. CONCLUSIONS: A diagnostic work-up should be performed in all children with non-immediate reactions to BL, to remove a false label of hypersensitivity. Even though only 57 (5.5%) of 1026 children displayed positive responses to delayed-reading intradermal tests to BL, such tests appear to be useful in order to reduce the risk for positive DPTs.