Unveiling the Economic Toll of Surgical Learning Curve in Elderly Hip Fractures.

Can the financial impact of implant choice during the learning curve of inexperienced surgeons in hip fracture surgery be quantified? Hip fractures in the elderly are a significant medical concern, often requiring surgical interventions performed by orthopedic surgery residents. As healthcare costs rise, exploring cost reduction opportunities within the healthcare system becomes crucial. In this prospective analysis, we examined the financial implications of implant choices encountered by residents during their learning curve in hip fracture surgery. Our study included 278 surgically treated pertrochanteric fractures using the same locking cephalomedullary nail. Data on patients, surgeons (including their experience and seniority), and all implants charged by the hospital were collected. This encompassed documentation of any nail-related equipment that was opened on the operating table and whether it was subsequently used by the end of the procedure. By calculating the number and cost of these implants, we assessed the financial burden associated with suboptimal choices made during the learning curve. Our findings revealed that in 16.18% of surgeries, instances of suboptimal implant utilization occurred, highlighting the complexities of the learning process. Importantly, the rate of these challenges was not influenced by surgeon seniority or patient characteristics. The mean additional cost per surgery was determined to be USD 65.69 ± 157.63 for surgeries with suboptimal implant utilization, compared to USD 56.55 ± 139.13 for surgeries without such challenges. Although there was a trend towards higher implant-related costs in resident-led surgeries, the difference did not reach statistical significance. These findings underscore the feasibility of enabling residents to autonomously perform intramedullary nailing surgeries, even without specialist supervision, while incurring minimal additional expenses during the learning curve. By acknowledging the financial implications associated with the learning curve in the management of hip fractures, we can strive to optimize healthcare costs, thus addressing an important aspect of this issue.

Implant wastage in orthopaedic trauma: a UK experience.

INTRODUCTION: Implant wastage is an under-reported issue in orthopaedics, yet it has been shown to have a significant cost burden on healthcare budgets. In a background of a perilous financial climate in the UK health service, our aim was to define the frequency and costs of implant wastage in orthopaedic trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The trauma theatre's implant logbook was retrospectively analysed between April 2017 and April 2018. Wasted implants were identified by the study authors independently. Patient demographics, implant details and costs were among the data collected. Product codes of wasted implants were used to identify implant costs through the manufacturer. RESULTS: Implant wastage occurred in 25.1% of trauma procedures during the study period. Most wasted implants (91%) were screws. The total cost of implant wastage was £8,377.25 during the 12-month period, accounting for 2% of the total implant budget. Wasted intramedullary nails accounted for almost 50% of the total cost. More than 51% of affected procedures involved a trainee as the primary operator. DISCUSSION: We report the first study of implant wastage in orthopaedics from the UK. Total implant wastage was higher than reported in most of the published literature, although it represented a small portion of the budget. Implant wastage is attributable to surgeons or operating theatre staff in most cases and is compounded by surgeons' limited understanding of implant costs. Initiatives to reduce implant wastage should include raising awareness of costs and departmental wastage to surgeons and operating theatre staff as well as employing preoperative planning techniques.

Transparency to Reduce Surgical Implant Waste.

BACKGROUND: Rising health care costs and emphasis on value have placed the onus of reducing healthcare costs on the surgeon. METHODS: Financial data from 3,973 hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasties performed at a physician owned orthopedic hospital was retrospectively reviewed over a two-year period. A wasted implant financial report was posted starting the second year of the study. Each surgeon's performance could be identified by his peers. RESULTS: After posting of the financial report, 1.11% of all hip and knee arthroplasty cases had a waste event compared to 1.50% during the control year. Shoulder arthroplasty waste events occurred twice as often than that observed in hip and knee arthroplasty during the study period. A decrease in waste events was observed but was not statistically significant (p = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Posting a non-blinded wasted implant data sheet was associated with a reduction in the number of wasted orthopedic surgical implants in this series, although the reduction was not statistically significant.

Transparency to Reduce Surgical Implant Waste

BACKGROUND: Rising health care costs and emphasis on value have placed the onus of reducing healthcare costs on the surgeon. METHODS: Financial data from 3,973 hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasties performed at a physician owned orthopedic hospital was retrospectively reviewed over a two-year period. A wasted implant financial report was posted starting the second year of the study. Each surgeon's performance could be identified by his peers. RESULTS: After posting of the financial report, 1.11% of all hip and knee arthroplasty cases had a waste event compared to 1.50% during the control year. Shoulder arthroplasty waste events occurred twice as often than that observed in hip and knee arthroplasty during the study period. A decrease in waste events was observed but was not statistically significant (p = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Posting a non-blinded wasted implant data sheet was associated with a reduction in the number of wasted orthopedic surgical implants in this series, although the reduction was not statistically significant.