Low and high hydrogen peroxide concentrations of in-office dental bleaching associated with violet light: an in vitro study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess hydrogen peroxide (HP) penetration within the pulp chamber, color change (CC), physical-chemical properties, and temperature using in-office different concentration bleaching gels with or without violet light. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty teeth were divided into five groups (n = 10) based on the HP concentration bleaching gels used (6% and 35%) and the used violet light (with or without). HP penetration within the pulp chamber was measured using UV-Vis. The CC was evaluated with a digital spectrophotometer. Initial and final concentration, and pH were measured through titration, and a Digital pHmeter, respectively. Temperature analyses were measured through a thermocouple. Statistical analysis included two-way ANOVA, Tukey's, and Dunnett's test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The presence of violet light did not affect the amount of HP within the pulp chamber, or the CC (p > 0.05). Greater penetration of HP was observed within the pulp chamber, as well as CC when using 35% HP (p < 0.05). The final concentration of both gels was lower than the initial concentration, regardless of the use of violet light (p < 0.05). The initial and final pH levels remained neutral and stable (p > 0.05). The pulp temperature increased when the gels were used in conjunction with violet light (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Using violet light in conjunction with 6% or 35% HP does not alter the physical properties of the bleaching agents, the penetration of HP or enhance color change. However, an increase in temperature was observed when violet light was applied associated with bleaching gels. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: While the simultaneous use of violet light with hydrogen peroxide 6% or 35% does not alter the material's properties, it also does not bring benefits in reducing hydrogen peroxide penetration and improving color change. Furthermore, the use of violet light increases pulp temperature.

Effect of gel replacement during in-office dental bleaching: a case report.

In-office dental bleaching allows the dentist to have greater control of the procedure and prevents patients from ingesting chemicals. To obtain optimum results, in-office bleaching usually requires a longer period of application as well as changes of the bleaching agent applied to the tooth surfaces at each appointment. The objective of this case report was to assess, by means of a split-mouth design in a single patient, the final tooth color and tooth sensitivity resulting from 2 different bleaching protocols: 1 application of 35% hydrogen peroxide for 45 minutes and 3 applications of 35% hydrogen peroxide for 15 minutes each. Neither the patient nor 5 individuals who were blinded to the techniques noted a difference in the final esthetic results of the 2 protocols immediately after the procedure. In addition, the patient reported that no tooth sensitivity was associated with either protocol. The results of dental bleaching on both sides were maintained after 15 days. The results shown in the present case report suggest that there may be no need to renew the gel during in-office dental bleaching.

Evaluation of Light Activation on In-office Dental Bleaching: A Systematic Review.

AIM: This review was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of light activation on in-office dental bleaching in terms of color change and photosensitivity with available literature evidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The articles were searched from MEDLINE/Pubmed and Journal of Web, which were published from 2001 to 2019. RESULTS: Out of the 124 references obtained, 13 articles in English language were read in full, which fulfilled the inclusion criteria. CONCLUSION: Light activation of hydrogen peroxide on in-office dental bleaching does not affect effectiveness of bleach. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Though claimed that in-office bleaching activated with light betters color change, the present review did not confirm this belief. How to cite this article: Alshammery S. Evaluation of Light Activation on In-office Dental Bleaching: A Systematic Review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019;20(11):1355-1360.

Comparison of in-office and at-home bleaching techniques: An umbrella review of efficacy and post-operative sensitivity.

Objectives: The objective of this umbrella review is to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of different teeth whitening techniques in-office (IO) and at-home (AH), regarding chromatic changes and teeth sensitivity. Materials and methods: The search was carried out from several databases. The included studies were all systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis of RCT or quasi-RCT. The participants were patients that underwent external dental bleaching in permanent vital teeth. The interventions were in-office (IO) bleaching techniques and at-home (AT) bleaching techniques with different bleaching agents and concentrations. Results: The search resulted in a total of 257 articles, and 28 SR were included in the qualitative analysis and nine in the quantitative analysis. There is no difference between in-office and at-home techniques in terms of color change (p = 0.95) and post-treatment sensitivity (p = 0.85). There is similarity risk and intensity of teeth sensitivity between AH and IO bleaching. IO bleaching with light-activated systems with low concentrations of bleaching agent showed similar results to IO bleaching techniques with high concentrated bleaching gels. With the application of the criteria of the AMSTAR 2 tool, the reviews were considered critically low to high. Conclusions: There are no significant differences in terms of color change between the different bleaching techniques compared. Teeth sensitivity is always present regardless of the technique used. The use of light activation systems did not increase the intensity and risk of post-operative sensitivity.

In-office bleaching protocols using violet LED: A split mouth case report.

A new LED wavelength, violet LED (VL) with a wavelength between 405 - 410 nm was recently introduced to be used for in-office dental bleaching. In comparison to the blue LED system (440 to 485 nm), the shorter wavelength has more energy carried in its photons and also corresponds to the absorption peak of the stained particles, which lead to whitening utilizing a physical process. Considering the need to suggest and develop new protocols with this new technology, this article reports 2 different dental bleaching protocols developed in a split-mouth model using VL. A 25-year-old male patient was submitted to in-office dental bleaching. On the teeth from the left side, the bleaching gel (35% H2O2) was renewed 3 times (every 8 mins), and on the right side, the gel was maintained without renewal during the bleaching session. The irradiation with Violet LED Light (405 nm ± 10 nm) was performed with the following protocol: 1 min of irradiation with 30 s light off until 8 min of total time. A total of 3 cycles were performed (total time of 24 min). Two bleaching sessions were performed with an interval of 7 days between sessions. Based on the results of this split-mouth case report, there was no visible difference in the final color outcome and sensitivity between both bleaching protocols tested.

The application of casein phosphopeptide and amorphous calcium phosphate with fluoride (CPP-ACPF) for restoring mineral loss after dental bleaching with hydrogen or carbamide peroxide: An in vitro study.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct an in vitro evaluation of the effect of casein-phosphopeptide and amorphous calcium phosphate with fluoride [CPP-ACPF] upon the calcium [Ca] and phosphorus [P] composition and morphology of dental enamel and dentin after the application of two bleaching agents: 37.5% hydrogen peroxide [HP]) and 35% carbamide peroxide [CP]. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The crowns of 40 extracted human teeth were divided into four groups (n=10 each). The crowns were sectioned along the cervical-incisal axis, and each half was embedded in acrylic resin, leaving a window 3mm in diameter to explore the enamel or dentin (according to the study group involved). Groups 1a and 1b corresponded to the two halves belonging to the same tooth and were treated with HP applied to enamel three times for 10min. Afterwards, CPP-ACPF was applied in group 1b for five minutes. The same procedure was carried out in groups 2a and 2b, but application was done on dentin. Groups 3a and 3b were treated with CP applied to enamel once for 30min. Posteriorly, CPP-ACPF was applied in group 3b for five minutes. Groups 4a and 4b were treated in the same way as groups 3a and 3b, but application was done on dentin. The morphological changes were evaluated using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), and the changes in Ca and P composition were assessed by environmental scanning electron microscopy coupled to a microanalytical system (ESEM+EDX). Comparisons between groups were made using the Kruskal-Wallis test, and Duncan test was applied for two-by-two comparisons, with a significance level of p<0.05. RESULTS: Both HP and CP produced similar changes in enamel morphology and produced no changes in dentin. Groups treated with CPP-ACPF after bleaching improved the percentage of Ca and P. Statistical significance was reached only in the case of the percentage of Ca in enamel (group 1b versus group 1a, p=0.01) (group 3b versus group 3a, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The application of CCP-ACPF for five minutes on the enamel surface after tooth bleaching is effective in restoring the Ca lost as a result of the bleaching process, while their effect in dentin could not be demonstrated.