Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neuromodulation ; 19(8): 885-888, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27191684

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To describe inter-lead (cross-talk) stimulation between a trigeminal nerve lead and a cervical epidural lead for the treatment of facial pain in a 69-year-old patient with empty nose syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A trial implant was performed with a peripheral V2 trigeminal lead and a C1-C2 lead in cross-talk configuration. During permanent implant, the V2 lead was placed uneventfully while the central lead could only be advanced to C3-C4. RESULTS: During the trial, pain decreased by 70%. One month after permanent implant, the patient still experienced a 60-70% reduction in pain levels and a decrease from ten to two weekly pain episodes. Nine months post implant, the patient reported complete pain relief (0/10 on a numeric rating scale ranging from 0 to 10) and medications were discontinued. Infrequent exacerbations (3/10) were controlled by increasing stimulation. Three years post implant, the patient continued to have no baseline pain and could easily control exacerbations. CONCLUSION: Cross-talk configuration between a peripheral and a central lead created a more efficient stimulation technique. The resulting paresthesia was superior to that obtained from either lead alone and exceeded the paresthesia obtained from the combination of the two leads when used simultaneously, without an inter-lead configuration.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Espaço Epidural/fisiologia , Dor Facial/terapia , Idoso , Biofísica , Dor Facial/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , Nervo Trigêmeo/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa