Neoadjuvant Intra-arterial Cytoreductive Chemotherapy Improves Outcomes in Lacrimal Gland Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma (LGACC) has historically been associated with a poor prognosis even with localized disease, with a survival of 56% at 5 years. In 1988, we treated the first patient with neoadjuvant intra-arterial cytoreductive chemotherapy (IACC). Since then, we have used this protocol as the standard approach. We aim to analyze the outcomes of patients with LGACC treated with the protocol and compare them to a population-based cohort to assess if IACC can improve survival. METHODS: We prospectively assessed all non-metastatic patients with LGACC treated with IACC at a single institution between 1988 and 2021. For a comparison group, we identified all non-metastatic patients with LGACC treated with excision from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. We calculated disease-specific survival using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional-hazards modeling methods. RESULTS: Thirty-five non-metastatic patients with LGACC treated with IACC were identified at a single institution, and 64 patients with non-metastatic LGACC treated with excision were identified in the SEER database. The 5- and 10-year disease-specific survival rates for patients treated with IACC were 84% (95%CI 71-97) and 76% (95%CI 60-92), respectively. While the 5- and 10-year disease-specific survival rates for the population-based cohort were 72% (95%CI 62-82) and 46% (95%CI 32-60). The survival analysis favored IACC, with a 60% lower risk of death (HR: 0.4; 95%CI 0.2-0.9). CONCLUSION: IACC improves disease-specific survival in comparison to a population-based cohort treated with excision. Additional patients treated with IACC at multiple institutions are required to provide further external validity.

Clinical Effects and Safety of Intra-Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy with Lipiodol versus Intra-Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Alone for Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in 2 groups of patients: those who receive lipiodol (referred to as the lipiodol group) and those who do not receive lipiodol (referred to as the control group). METHODS: From January 2016 through December 2023, 85 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled in this retrospective study. In total, 40 patients received HAIC with lipiodol, while 45 patients were given HAIC without lipiodol. The modified response evaluation criteria for solid tumors were used to evaluate the tumor response, which was assessed through an imaging study. The two groups were compared regarding their overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. RESULTS: The outcomes between the lipiodol group and control group demonstrated no significant difference: the objective response rates (p = 0.066) were 32.5% and 15.6%; the disease control rates (p = 0.556) were 67.5% and 73.3%; the median OS times (p = 0.339) were 224 days and 398 days; the median PFS (p = 0.334) times were 191 days and 286 days in the lipiodol group and the control group, respectively. Adverse events also showed no significant difference between the two groups: elevation of total bilirubin (p = 0.834) rates were 40.0% and 37.8%; elevation of alanine aminotransferase (p = 0.191) percentages were 35.0% and 22.2%; and elevation of aspartate aminotransferase values (p = 0.058) were 65.0% and 44.4% in the lipiodol group and the control group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HAIC without lipiodol was non-inferior to HAIC with lipiodol in the clinical outcome.

Intra-arterial peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy for neuro-endocrine tumour liver metastases: an in-patient randomised controlled trial (LUTIA).

PURPOSE: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE has been shown to effectively prolong progression free survival in grade 1-2 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET), but is less efficacious in patients with extensive liver metastases. The aim was to investigate whether tumour uptake in liver metastases can be enhanced by intra-arterial administration of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE into the hepatic artery, in order to improve tumour response without increasing toxicity. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with grade 1-2 GEP-NET, and bi-lobar liver metastases were randomized to receive intra-arterial PRRT in the left or right liver lobe for four consecutive cycles. The contralateral liver lobe and extrahepatic disease were treated via a "second-pass" effect and the contralateral lobe was used as the control lobe. Up to three metastases (> 3 cm) per liver lobe were identified as target lesions at baseline on contrast-enhanced CT. The primary endpoint was the tumour-to-non-tumour (T/N) uptake ratio on the 24 h post-treatment [177Lu]Lu-SPECT/CT after the first cycle. This was calculated for each target lesion in both lobes using the mean uptake. T/N ratios in both lobes were compared using paired-samples t-test. FINDINGS: After the first cycle, a non-significant difference in T/N uptake ratio was observed: T/NIA = 17·4 vs. T/Ncontrol = 16·2 (p = 0·299). The mean increase in T/N was 17% (1·17; 95% CI [1·00; 1·37]). Of all patients, 67% (18/27) showed any increase in T/N ratio after the first cycle. CONCLUSION: Intra-arterial [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE is safe, but does not lead to a clinically significant increase in tumour uptake.

Endovascular surgical neuro-oncology: advancing a new subspecialty.

Endovascular surgical neuro-oncology is a relatively new subspecialty which uses endovascular neuro-interventional techniques for the management of nervous system tumors and tumor-related vascular conditions. Although there are several endovascular procedures that are widely available as standard-of-care diagnostic and treatment adjuncts, there has been a renewed interest to explore endovascular approaches as a means for selective intra-arterial delivery of therapeutic agents to nervous system tumors, including methods for opening the blood brain and blood tumor barriers. In this review, we discuss the historical development of various forms of endovascular intra-arterial treatment for tumors over the past 40 years, summarize endovascular approaches that are currently being employed, and highlight current clinical trials.

Prognosis prediction and risk stratification of transarterial chemoembolization or intraarterial chemotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma based on machine learning.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a risk scoring scale model (RSSM) for stratifying prognostic risk after intra-arterial therapies (IATs) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Between February 2014 and October 2022, 2338 patients with HCC who underwent initial IATs were consecutively enrolled. These patients were divided into training datasets (TD, n = 1700), internal validation datasets (ITD, n = 428), and external validation datasets (ETD, n = 200). Five-years death was used to predict outcome. Thirty-four clinical information were input and five supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms, including eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Categorical Gradient Boosting (CatBoost), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBT), and Random Forest (RF), were compared using the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) with DeLong test. The variables with top important ML scores were used to build the RSSM by stepwise Cox regression. RESULTS: The CatBoost model achieved the best discrimination when 12 top variables were input, with the AUC of 0.851 (95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.833-0.868) for TD, 0.817 (95%CI, 0.759-0.857) for ITD, and 0.791 (95%CI, 0.748-0.834) for ETD. The RSSM was developed based on the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) (hazard ratios (HR), 0.678; 95%CI 0.549, 0.837), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) (HR, 0.702; 95%CI 0.605, 0.814), local therapy (HR, 0.104; 95%CI 0.014, 0.747), response to the first IAT (HR, 4.221; 95%CI 2.229, 7.994), tumor size (HR, 1.054; 95%CI 1.038, 1.070), and BCLC grade (HR, 2.375; 95%CI 1.950, 2.894). Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed the role of RSSM in risk stratification (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The RSSM can stratify accurately prognostic risk for HCC patients received IAT. On the basis, an online calculator permits easy implementation of this model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The risk scoring scale model could be easily implemented for physicians to stratify risk and predict prognosis quickly and accurately, thereby serving as a more favorable tool to strengthen individualized intra-arterial therapies and management in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. KEY POINTS: • The Categorical Gradient Boosting (CatBoost) algorithm achieved the optimal and robust predictive ability (AUC, 0.851 (95%CI, 0.833-0.868) in training datasets, 0.817 (95%CI, 0.759-0.857) in internal validation datasets, and 0.791 (95%CI, 0.748-0.834) in external validation datasets) for prediction of 5-years death of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after intra-arterial therapies (IATs) among five machine learning models. • We used the SHapley Additive exPlanations algorithms to explain the CatBoost model so as to resolve the black boxes of machine learning principles. • A simpler restricted variable, risk scoring scale model (RSSM), derived by stepwise Cox regression for risk stratification after intra-arterial therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma, provides the potential forewarning to adopt combination strategies for high-risk patients.

A multi-institutional feasibility study of intra-arterial chemotherapy in children with retinoblastoma. A Children's Oncology Group study (COG ARET12P1).

BACKGROUND: Intra-arterial chemotherapy (IA) as a treatment to salvage the eye with advanced retinoblastoma is increasingly utilized based on successes reported by institutions around the world mainly through retrospective studies. OBJECTIVE: To study the feasibility of delivering melphalan directly into the ophthalmic artery in a multi-institutional prospective study in children with newly diagnosed unilateral group D retinoblastoma. METHODS: The Children's Oncology Group (COG) initiated study ARET12P1 in 2014 and was open to nine institutions. Eligible patients older than six months of age were enrolled. The feasibility of delivering three injections of melphalan into the ophthalmic artery every 28 days was assessed. RESULTS: Nine institutions participated in this trial. Fourteen patients were enrolled, two of whom were unevaluable for feasibility. Four patients experienced a feasibility failure. In two patients, the ophthalmic artery could not be accessed for the second IA injection, in one the artery could not be accessed for the first injection, and one patient experienced grade 4 hypotension during the procedure. CONCLUSION: Delivery of prescribed therapy within the context of this study did not meet the feasibility goals of the study with only a 67% feasibility success rate. These results should caution centers that plan to initiate this treatment and suggest investment in training to achieve technical expertise or referral to centers with expertise.

The impact of methylene blue in colon cancer: a retrospective multicentric study.

INTRODUCTION: Discussions about the optimal lymph node (LN) count and its therapeutic consequences have persisted over time. The final LN count in colorectal tissues is affected by a variety of variables (patient, tumor, operation, pathologist, immune response). Methylene blue (MB) intra-arterial injection is a simple and inexpensive procedure that can be used to enhance lymph node count. AIM: Analyze whether there is a statistically significant difference between intra-arterial methylene blue injection and conventional dissection for the quantification of lymph nodes and determine if there is a variation in the quality of lymph node acquisition. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2022, we conducted a retrospective analysis of colon cancer specimens. Data on the tumor's features, the number of lymph nodes, the number of lymph nodes that were positive, and other factors had been collected. The number of identified lymph nodes was highly significantly improved in the study group (P < 0.05). There is not a significant statistical difference between groups regarding the metastatic lymph node harvest. The group with injection of intra-arterial methylene blue shows a significantly decreased (P < 0.05) of the of cases with less than 12 lymph nodes recovered comparing with the control group. CONCLUSION: Colon cancer specimens can be easily evaluated concerning lymph nodes using the methylene blue method. Therefore, we strongly advise this approach as a standard procedure in the histological evaluation of colon cancer specimens in order to maximize the identification of lymph nodes. However, the detection of metastatic lymph nodes was unaffected significantly.

Quality of life following treatment with intra-arterial cisplatin with concurrent radiation and erlotinib for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Studies that focus on the feasibility of using erlotinib plus chemoradiation to treat locally advanced head and neck cancer have given hints of improved survival outcomes compared to chemoradiation alone. However, the influence of this treatment regimen on the quality of life of the patients has not been documented. We conducted a study of this triple combination and now have documented follow-up survival data as well as long-term quality of life (QoL) measures. METHODS: Three sets of QoL questionnaires were given to patients with a diagnosis of head and neck cancer at two time points, pre- and post-treatment, to assess differences in quality of life after receiving chemotherapy with intra-arterial (IA) cisplatin (150 mg/m2), concomitant radiation (70 Gy), and oral erlotinib (150 mg/day). Additionally, patients were followed for a total of 5 years. RESULTS: Treatment had a detrimental effect on appearance, taste, and saliva domain scores in their QoL questionnaires. Nonetheless, fewer patients reported pain and anxiety. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: The combination of erlotinib with chemoradiation produced similar adverse effects on the QoL scores of patients with head and neck cancer as compared to chemoradiation alone.

Surgical resection versus thermal ablation after intra-arterial conversion therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective one as per the STROBE guidelines.

PURPOSE: Intra-arterial conversion therapy (ICT) is a promising option for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, the selection of sequential therapeutic modalities is still controversial. This study compared the efficacy and safety of surgical resection (SR) versus thermal ablation (TA) after patients with uHCC received ICT. METHODS: From May 2008 to November 2021, 3553 consecutive patients were reviewed and 791 patients were downstaged to receive TA or SR. Among them, 340 patients received SR, and 451 received TA after ICTs. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was applied to reduce selection bias between groups. Cumulative overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test. The occurrence of complications and adverse events (AEs) were compared using chi-square test. RESULTS: After PSM 1:1 (n = 185 in both groups), the 10-year OS and PFS rates for patients who underwent SR were comparable to those of patients who underwent TA (OS: 45.2% vs. 36.1%; p = 0.190; PFS: 19.3% vs. 15.9%; p = 0.533). A total of 237 (29.9%) patients (203 males; mean age:57.1 ± 11.0 years) received downstaging therapy, and long-term OS and PFS remained comparable between the two groups (p = 0.718, 0.636, respectively). However, the cumulative OS and PFS rates in the downstaged cohort were significantly higher than those in the nondownstaged cohort (both ps < 0.001). Additionally, there was no difference in major complications between the two groups (SR: 6.3% vs. TA: 8.6%; p = 0.320). CONCLUSIONS: TA might be an acceptable first-line alternative to SR after patients with uHCC receive ICT, especially patients unsuitable for SR. Better long-term survival was observed among patients in the downstaged cohort compared to those who failed to downstage.

Improved visual outcomes of central retinal artery occlusion with local intra-arterial fibrinolysis beyond the conventional time window.

Local intra-arterial fibrinolysis (LIF) is a promising therapeutic option for CRAO. However, the narrow time window of 6 h has greatly limited the application of LIF. In this study, we explored the efficacy of LIF beyond the conventional time windows and compared the result with conservative therapy. This prospective study included 179 CRAO patients with baseline visual acuity (VA) ≤ 20/400 treated at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. The mean time from vision loss to presentation was 5.5 days. 58 patients received conventional standard therapy (CST) alone.121 patients underwent LIF. Main outcome was VA improvement ≥ 0.3 logMAR. Secondary outcome was a favorable VA outcome of 20/200 or better. Logistic regressions were performed to identify predictors of visual improvement. 43% patients in the LIF group experienced VA improvement versus 19% with CST (P = 0.002). LIF was associated with 4.0-fold higher likelihood of visual improvement compared to CST (P = 0.001). Poor baseline VA (light perception or no light perception) and shortened prothrombin time (PT) were associated with greater chance of visual improvement with LIF. However, LIF showed no significant advantage over CST for favorable VA outcomes. No major complications occurred. LIF beyond the therapeutic time window improved vision in functionally blind CRAO patients and showed better efficacy when compared with CST. PT may be a potential predictor of visual outcome after LIF. Our findings could complement existing time-based treatment guidelines and potentially allow for personalized decisions on the use of LIF beyond time windows.

Angiographic characteristics and treatment approach in patients undergoing intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma.

PURPOSE: To identify the specific clinical and angiographic variables that determine the success of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) in a patient with retinoblastoma. METHODS: Medical records from patients undergoing intra-arterial chemotherapy for the treatment of retinoblastoma between January 2015 and June 2020 within a large academic ocular oncology practice were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics were recorded together with clinical, ocular, and angiographic variables such as the diameter of the ophthalmic artery (OA), angle of ophthalmic artery takeoff, and branching pattern of ophthalmic vasculature. RESULTS: Forty-four eyes from 33 patients with retinoblastoma treated with IAC were identified. Over the total 32 mean months of follow-up, these patients received 144 total catheterizations and a mean of 3.2 IAC cycles for each eye. The number of IAC cycles and the chemotherapeutic agent used did not vary significantly with worsening International Classification of Retinoblastoma (ICRB) groups (P > 0.1). Cumulative dose did not vary with the ICRB group for eyes treated with melphalan, topotecan, or carboplatin (P > 0.1). A higher ICRB group was associated with a smaller mean ophthalmic artery diameter across all procedures (P = 0.016), and femoral artery diameter did not vary significantly between ICRB groups (P = 0.906). A higher cumulative dose of IAC was significantly associated with a smaller takeoff angle of the OA (melphalan, P = 0.011; topotecan, P = 0.009; carboplatin, P = 0.031) in patients who underwent successful IAC procedures. Ophthalmic artery diameter and femoral artery diameter did not have a significant association (P > 0.1) with higher IAC doses in successful IACs. Cumulative IAC dose was not significantly associated with ophthalmic vasculature branching pattern, presence of choroidal blush, temporary OA vasospasm reported during the procedure, and OA occlusion upon microcatheter placement. CONCLUSION: In this study, neurosurgical angioanatomy appeared to influence the cumulative dose of chemotherapy needed during IAC for retinoblastoma. In the future, these anatomic variables may be used to guide the frequency of monitoring, dosing, and estimation of recurrence risk.

Comparison of anesthesia methods for intra-arterial therapy of patients with acute ischemic stroke: an updated meta-analysis and systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: Currently, there remains debate regarding the optimal anesthesia approach for patients undergoing intra-arterial therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Therefore, we conducted a comparative analysis to assess the effects of general anesthesia versus non general anesthesia on patient outcomes. METHODS: The research methodology entailed comprehensive searches of prominent databases such as the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, covering the period from January 1, 2010, to March 1, 2024. Data synthesis employed techniques like risk ratio or standardized mean difference, along with 95% confidence intervals. The study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024523079). RESULTS: A total of 27 trials and 12,875 patients were included in this study. The findings indicated that opting for non-general anesthesia significantly decreased the risk of in-hospital mortality (RR, 1.98; 95% CI: 1.50 to 2.61; p<0.00001; I2 = 20%), as well as mortality within three months post-procedure (RR, 1.24; 95% CI: 1.15 to 1.34; p<0.00001; I2 = 26%), while also leading to a shorter hospitalization duration (SMD, 0.24; 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.33; p<0.00001; I2 = 44%). CONCLUSION: Ischemic stroke patients who undergo intra-arterial treatment without general anesthesia have a lower risk of postoperative adverse events and less short-term neurological damage. In routine and non-emergency situations, non-general anesthetic options may be more suitable for intra-arterial treatment, offering greater benefits to patients. In addition to this, the neuroprotective effects of anesthetic drugs should be considered more preoperatively and postoperatively.

In vivo study of the utility of selective intra-arterial injection of thiopental for neuroprotection in reversible cerebral ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Neuroprotective agents are needed to reduce cerebral damage during surgical or neurointerventional procedures including stroke patients. PURPOSE: To evaluate if thiopental can be used as a neuroprotective agent when injected intra-arterially in a transient ischemia model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 24 rabbits were studied as four groups of six animals. Group 1 served as the control group. In group 2, transient ischemia was obtained by intracarotid administration of degradable starch microspheres (DSM). Group 3 was administered thiopental intra-arterially via the carotid artery. Group 4 (experimental group) received both thiopental and DSM intra-arterially. DSM and thiopental were administered through a microcatheter placed into the common carotid artery via the central ear artery access. After sacrifice, apoptotic cells in the cerebral tissues of the animals were evaluated in H&E and TUNEL stained slides. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the number of apoptotic glial or neuronal cells in group 2 compared to the control group and group 3. The mean number of both the apoptotic neuronal cells (6.8 ± 2.1 vs. 2.5 ± 1.3, P < 0.001) and the apoptotic glial cells (9.4 ± 3.1 vs. 4.6 ± 1.6, P < 0.001) were higher in group 2 compared to group 4. In addition, a higher level of neurological improvement was observed in group 4 compared to group 2 based on neurological assessment score. CONCLUSION: The intra-arterial administration of thiopental has a protective effect on both glial and neuronal cells during temporary cerebral ischemia in low doses.

Stellate Ganglion Block and Intraarterial Spasmolysis in Patients with Cerebral Vasospasm: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: In patients with symptomatic cerebral vasospasm (CV) following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage who do not respond to medical therapy, urgent treatment escalation has been suggested to be beneficial for brain tissue at risk. In our routine clinical care setting, we implemented stellate ganglion block (SGB) as a rescue therapy with subsequent escalation to intraarterial spasmolysis (IAS) with milrinone for refractory CV. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis from 2012 to 2021, patients with CV following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage who received an SGB or IAS were identified. Patients were assessed through neurological examination and transcranial Doppler. Rescue therapy was performed in patients with mean cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) ≥ 120 cm/s and persistent neurological deterioration/intubation under induced hypertension. Patients were reassessed after therapy and the following day. The Glasgow Outcome Scale was assessed at discharge and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients (mean age 50.16 years) with 184 areas treated with SGB and/or IAS met the inclusion criteria; 109 nonaffected areas were extracted as controls. The mean CBFV decrease in the middle cerebral artery on the following day was - 30.1 (± 45.2) cm/s with SGB and - 31.5 (± 45.2) cm/s with IAS. Mixed linear regression proved the significance of the treatment categories; other fixed effects (sex, age, aneurysm treatment modality [clipping or coiling], World Federation of Neurological Surgeons score, and Fisher score) were insignificant. In logistic regression, the presence of cerebral infarction on imaging before discharge from the intensive care unit (34/82) was significantly associated with unfavorable outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale ≤ 3) at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Stellate ganglion block and IAS decreased CBFV the following 24 h in patients with CV. We suggest SGB alone for patients with mild symptomatic CV (CBFV < 180 cm/s), while subsequent escalation to IAS proved to be beneficial in patients with refractory CV and severe CBFV elevation (CBFV ≥ 180 cm/s).

Efficacy of Superselective Intra-arterial Recanalization of Embolized Arteries Resulting from Facial Hyaluronic Acid Injection.

BACKGROUND: Arterial embolism is a rare complication caused by hyaluronic acid (HA) injection. However, it is one of the most serious complications. Once it happens, the complication would have a great and long-term impact on patients. Intra-arterial recanalization has been reported for recovering the visual acuity in patients with visual loss caused by hyaluronic acid. There is little report about the benefits of superselective intra-arterial recanalization therapy for skin wounds caused by hyaluronic acid vascular embolization. METHODS: Eight patients who had received the superselective intra-arterial recanalization therapy were retrospectively reviewed. Hyaluronidase was injected into the facial artery by superselective intra-arterial recanalization therapy, followed by symptomatic treatment. The facial artery recanalization was successfully performed and no interventional procedure-related adverse events happened. RESULTS: Arterial embolization accompanies by the interruption or reduction of blood supply, followed by ochrodermia, pain, numbness, swelling, yellowish white secreta and even necrosis on skin wound area. Early detection of skin blood supply disorders and early recovery of blood supply are very critical to treat facial artery embolization caused by HA. After superselective intra-arterial recanalization therapy, the blood supply to facial skin was restored and skin wounds recovered in all patients. Only 1 patient was left with small and superficial scars. CONCLUSION: Superselective intra-arterial recanalization therapy is an effective and safe method that can alleviate skin wounds caused by HA vascular embolization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Superselective Arterial Hyaluronidase Thrombolysis is an Effective Treatment for Hyaluronic Acid-Induced Retinal Artery Occlusion: Study in a Rabbit Model.

BACKGROUND: There are serious complications associated with hyaluronic acid (HA) facial injections, including vision impairment due to retinal artery ischemia. In this study, we put forth a clinically relevant model of retinal ischemia and reperfusion in rabbit. We used this to verify the efficacy of hyaluronidase intra-artery thrombolysis in the treatment of hyaluronic acid-induced retinal artery occlusion. METHODS: Retinal artery ischemia was induced by injecting HA into the ophthalmic artery (OA) of adult chinchilla rabbit, and reperfusion was achieved by intra-artery thrombolysis therapy with hyaluronidase following 60 min and 4 h of occlusion. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) were used to evaluate blood flow in the retina. Electroretinogram (ERG), hematoxylin and eosin staining and transmission electron microscope were used to evaluate the structure and function of the retina after ischemia and reperfusion following 60 min and 4 h of occlusion. RESULTS: DSA and FFA images confirmed occlusion of the ophthalmic and central retinal arteries, as well as reperfusion after hyaluronidase thrombolysis. ERG indicated retinal dysfunction following ischemia, and thrombolysis partially rescued its impairment following 4 h of occlusion. Hematoxylin and eosin staining and TUNEL staining revealed ischemia-induced histological damages in the retina at different time windows, and hyaluronidase thrombolysis partially mitigated these damages. CONCLUSIONS: We report a method to establish a HA-induced retinal artery occlusion animal model. Hyaluronidase intra-artery thrombolysis was used to recanalize the embolized OA at different time points. Using our method, we achieved retinal reperfusion, and an improvement was observed in the visual function of rabbits after hyaluronidase thrombolysis following 4 h of occlusion. We believe that hyaluronidase intra-artery thrombolysis is an effective method to treat HA-induced retinal artery occlusion in clinic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Percutaneous Intra-arterial Hyaluronidase Injection for Hyaluronic Acid Filler Embolism Threatening Skin Barrier Integrity: Implementation of a Stepwise Treatment Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid (HA) filler-induced vascular embolism that threatens skin integrity is an urgent situation. There is increasing evidence that percutaneous intra-arterial hyaluronidase injection is an effective therapeutic technique for it. However, until now, there is a lack of a unifying protocol about the technique. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to provide a conclusion of percutaneous intra-arterial hyaluronidase injection along with adjunctive measures on the treatment of occlusions precipitated by HA-based filler and develop a stepwise treatment protocol. METHODS: We searched PubMed for peer-reviewed studies, consensus statements, case series, and case reports using a variety of keywords. RESULTS: High-dose, pulsed hyaluronidase is the mainstay for the treatment of HA filler-induced embolism, but percutaneous intra-arterial hyaluronidase injection is a more effective technique. Until now, hyaluronidase is injected into three arteries percutaneously, including facial artery, supratrochlear artery, and superficial temporal artery. Furthermore, the adjunctive measures that may optimize clearance of an occlusion and/or skin barrier repair such as the use of image guidance and CGF should be considered. CONCLUSION: Vascular occlusions that threaten skin integrity are an urgent matter which requires accurate diagnosis and effective intervention. Percutaneous intra-arterial hyaluronidase injection along with adjunctive measures performed in a stepwise manner is key to an optimal outcome. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Intra-arterial thrombolysis with tenecteplase for the treatment of cervical spinal cord ischemia: Technical case report.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, there have anecdotal reports of intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) for the treatment of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) with encouraging results. We describe a patient with acute cervical SCI who underwent IAT with Tenecteplase at our institution. CASE PRESENTATION: A 20-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a 12-hour history of progressive onset upper and lower extremity numbness, weakness, and urinary incontinence after sustaining a fall. MRI of cervical spine demonstrated T2 and STIR hyperintensity in the ventral aspect of the spinal cord spanning the C3, C4, and C5 levels suggestive of SCI. He demonstrated progression of neurologic deficits to C4 ASIA B spinal cord injury with complete loss of motor function, diminished sensation, and absent rectal tone. Emergent angiography was performed with prominent anterior spinal supply via the left ascending cervical artery. A total of 30 mg of Tenecteplase was administered intra-arterially in the bilateral vertebral arteries, bilateral ascending cervical arteries, and bilateral inferior thyroid arteries. Two-week post-intervention neurologic examination demonstrated improvement in injury level and severity. The patient was C6 ASIA C SCI, with 2/5 strength in the distal upper and lower extremities and improved sensation. CONCLUSION: IAT with Tenecteplase may be a feasible option for the treatment of acute spinal cord ischemia in carefully selected patients.

The use of a (non-) balloon guide catheter in endovascular stroke treatment, a registry of real-life use and nationwide questionnaire.

INTRODUCTION: Despite literature suggesting benefits of a balloon guide catheter (BGC) in stroke thrombectomy, BGCs are not routinely used. This study aimed to get insights in the use of a BGC and the reasons (not) to inflate the balloon. METHODS: Data were used of the Maastricht Stroke Quality Registry (MaSQ-Registry), a prospective registry for quality purposes of stroke patients treated between September 2020-February 2023. Additionally, a Dutch nationwide questionnaire was sent among all stroke treating physicians of the Dutch Society of Interventional Radiology (NVIR). Information on the use and reasons for selecting a (non-)BGC and using the BGC was collected. RESULTS: Out of 511 patients registered in the MaSQ-Registry, 458 were included. In 69% (n=317) of the patients a BGC was used; in 68% (n=214) the balloon was not inflated. In 95% of the posterior circulation occlusions a non-BGC was used. In total 47 treating physicians from sixteen stroke centers responded to the questionnaire. 51% (n=24) preferred a non-BGC and 30% (n=14) never used a BGC. 52% and 18% of the BGC-users estimated they inflate the balloon in 80-100% and 0-20% of the times, respectively. The main reasons reported for not inflating the balloon were when the BGC was occlusive (47%) or not placeable (34%) in the carotid artery. CONCLUSION: This study shows variation in the use of (non-)BGC use with and without inflated balloon among treating physicians in the Netherlands, highlighting current limited consensus regarding the use of (non-)BGCs among stroke treating physicians.

Accuracy of intra-arterial line transducer levelling practice in a general intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: The intra-arterial line is a common device intervention used in the intensive care environment to provide continuous blood pressure measurement. The transducer line is levelled to the patient's phlebostatic axis to provide accurate measurements. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate registered nurses' accuracy at levelling the transducer to the correct anatomical position using visual judgement, compared to one done using a laser level. METHODS: Patient transducers were levelled by visual judgement and then by using a laser level. Time and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded with each measurement along with any difference in transducer level between the two methods and subsequent changes in inotrope administration. RESULTS: A total of 577 MAP measurements were recorded from 178 patients; 70% of observations had a difference in transducer level, 30% of the time the inotrope rate was increased and 18% of the time the inotrope rate was reduced. The prevalence of clinically significant observations with an absolute difference of 50 mm or more in transducer placement was 25%. The mean difference in MAP measurements when a cut-off of 64 mmHg or more for laser was applied to the data was 0.22 (95% confidence interval: -0.14, 0.58, n = 513, p = 0.23), and for a cut-off of less than 64 for laser, a larger mean difference of 4.36 (95% confidence interval: 3.75, 5.28], n = 64, p < 0.001) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Transducers were unable to be accurately levelled for haemodynamic monitoring using visual means alone. Over the range of patient MAP values examined, 25% of all observations had a clinically significant absolute difference of 50 mm or more in the transducer level position between the two methods. The visual method became increasingly inaccurate and unreliable at low MAP levels requiring medical intervention.