Caesarean Delivery: A Narrative Review on the Choice of Neuraxially Administered Opioid and Its Implications for the Multimodal Peripartum Pain Concept.

Nowadays, obstetrical anesthesia-related mortality is a very rare complication in industrialized countries. The recommended choice of intrathecal opioid for spinal anesthesia in the context of a multimodal peripartum pain management concept is discussed in this narrative review. Nowadays, there is a consensus that a perioperative multimodal pain concept should be used for caesarean delivery. This pain concept should include neuraxial opioids for spinal anesthesia, acetaminophen, NSAIDs, intravenous dexamethasone, and postoperative local or regional anesthetic procedures. Long-acting lipophobic opioids (diamorphine and morphine) have a significant analgesic advantage over short-acting lipophilic opioids (sufentanil and fentanyl). The risk of clinically relevant respiratory depression after neuraxial long-acting opioids is nowadays considered negligible, even if the data situation is weak in this regard. The question remains as to whether a pain concept that is ideally adapted to a neuraxial short-acting opioid shows benefit to a pain concept that is optimally adapted to neuraxial morphine. If long-acting opioids are used, the timing of each additional component of the multimodal analgesia strategy could ideally be adjusted to this longer duration of action.

Analgesia for major laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a randomised feasibility trial using intrathecal morphine.

Effective pain control enhances patient recovery after surgery. Laparoscopic techniques for major abdominal surgery are increasingly utilised to reduce surgical trauma. Intrathecal morphine is an attractive analgesic option that is gaining popularity. However, limited evidence guides its use in the setting of laparoscopic surgery. In addition, enhanced recovery after surgery pathways advocate opioid-sparing techniques. We conducted a feasibility trial to compare intrathecal morphine with non-neuraxial analgesia in laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted major abdominal surgery to inform the design of a future large clinical trial. This multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted at two tertiary hospitals in Australia. Fifty-one patients were randomly allocated to receive either intrathecal morphine (intervention group) or a sham subcutaneous injection of normal saline in the lumbar area (control group) immediately before the induction of general anaesthesia. Co-primary outcomes were patient recruitment and successful adherence to treatment allocation as per the study protocol. The primary endpoints of feasibility and protocol adherence were met with a 46% recruitment rate (51 of 110 eligible patients) and 96% protocol adherence. There was only one patient with failed access to the intrathecal space. For secondary endpoints, fewer patients in the intrathecal morphine group required opioids in the post-anaesthesia care unit, their postoperative pain scores at rest were lower across the four time-points measured (p = 0.007), but not dynamic pain scores (p = 0.061), and pruritus was more common following intrathecal morphine (p = 0.007). Total oral morphine equivalents until postoperative day 3 were less in the intrathecal morphine group (median (95%CI) difference 82 (-13 to 168) mg), but this reduction was not statistically significant (p = 0.10). These findings support conducting a definitive clinical trial.

A Cross-cultural Perspective on Intrathecal Opioid Therapy Between German and Iranian Patients.

Patients often adhere to intrathecal opioid therapy (IOT) for many years, despite the lack of scientific evidence for its efficacy and the scarce knowledge about long-term effects. Moreover, there is no knowledge on how the efficacy of IOT is influenced by cultural factors. We assessed the long-term efficacy and frequency of side effects of IOT in two culturally different patient samples. A chart review was conducted of all patients with IOT, who had been treated in interdisciplinary pain centers in Freiburg and in Tehran in a 15-year span. Personal data, diagnosis, duration of pain disease, pump type in use, revision operations, and opioid doses were recorded. Patients completed a questionnaire containing pain scores, pain-related disability (PDI), anxiety, depression, and unwanted side effects. Fourteen Iranian and 36 German patients (32 m/18 f) were studied. Mean duration of IOT was 10.2 years. Pain levels prior to IOT were 7.64 (NRS) (range 4-10, SD 1.64), 3.86 (range 0-9, SD 2.32) directly after pump implantation, and 4.17 (range 0-10, SD 2.11) at time of follow-up. Iranian patients had significantly lower pain levels directly after implantation, depression scores, and pain-related disability. Frequent side effects were obstipation, sexual dysfunction, urinary retention, and fatigue. Most side effects were significantly less frequent in the Iranian sample. There were no severe complications or permanent neurological deficit. Our study demonstrates the effectiveness of IOT also for long-term application. Differences in clinical efficacy are partially due to cultural factors. Side effects are frequent but not limiting patient satisfaction.

Intrathecal opioids: equally efficacious at any age.

BACKGROUND: Intrathecal opioid pumps have been used in the management of severe chronic pain for more than 40 years. Numerous studies have shown significant therapeutic effects alongside tolerable side effects. In the last decades, life expectancy has increased in many countries in the world. With an aging population, the question arises whether effects equal to those in younger patients can also be achieved in elderly patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is an in-depth re-analysis of data published previously. 36 patients were analyzed. The sample included 18 elderly patients (> 65 years) and 18 younger patients. RESULTS: No differences between the two samples were found with regard to pain intensity under intrathecal opioid therapy and prior to implantation of the opioid pump. Likewise, there were no differences in anxiety/depression scores and pain-related disability. Side effects were reported at similar rates by the elderly patients and by the younger patients. Elderly patients showed a tendency towards lower opioid doses and slower dose increases. CONCLUSION: Our data hint at a consistent efficacy of intrathecal opioid therapy in elderly patients even after long-term treatment. Side effects of the treatment are relatively frequent but mild and no side effects were particularly frequent in elderly people.

Association Between Oral Pain Medications and Intrathecal Opioid Dose Escalation: A Retrospective Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Patients treated with intrathecal therapy frequently require opioid dose increases to maintain analgesia. The kinetics of intrathecal opioid dose escalation are poorly understood. We hypothesized that antidepressant use, antiepileptic use, and lower baseline oral opioid intake prior to intrathecal pump implantation will be protective against intrathecal opioid dose escalation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Targeted drug delivery medication doses were collected from patients who had an intrathecal pump implanted between 2007 and 2016. From a sample size of 136 patients, the association between antidepressant, antiepileptic, and oral opioid use with intrathecal dose escalation was assessed using statistical models. RESULTS: Individuals using an antiepileptic had an estimated ratio of means (97.5% CI) of opioid consumption of 0.91 (97.5% CI: [0.48, 1.73], p = 0.74) at six months, 0.83 ([0.43, 1.58], p = 0.51) at 12 months, and 0.77 ([0.40, 1.45], p = 0.36) at 24 months. Patients prescribed antidepressants had an estimated ratio of means (97.5% CI) of 1.43 ([0.77, 2.65], p = 0.19) at six months, 1.41 ([0.76, 2.63], p = 0.22) at 12 months, and 1.33 ([0.70, 2.51], p = 0.31) at 24 months. In our secondary analysis of pre-implant oral opioid use, patients treated with high oral opioid doses had a similar pattern of intrathecal dose escalation when compared to patients using low doses of oral opioids. CONCLUSIONS: Use of antiepileptics, antidepressants, or low oral opioid doses was not associated with attenuation of intrathecal dose escalation. Intrathecal opioid dose escalation was observed to occur similarly, regardless of baseline oral analgesics concomitantly employed.

Probability of Undiagnosed Obstructive Sleep Apnea Does Not Correlate With Adverse Pulmonary Events nor Length of Stay in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using Intrathecal Opioid.

BACKGROUND: Recent emphasis on bundled payments and outcomes tracking has increased the focus on preoperative optimization in patients undergoing elective lower extremity arthroplasty. Since patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have an increased risk of adverse perioperative pulmonary events, screening for undiagnosed OSA is sometimes included as part of preoperative risk assessment. However, there are limited data regarding quantification of OSA risk in lower extremity arthroplasty patients, and little is known about the utility of quantitative OSA screening and the risk of pulmonary complications in hip and knee arthroplasty patients who receive intrathecal morphine anesthetic. METHODS: A retrospective review of 990 patients at a tertiary care, urban academic medical center who underwent lower extremity arthroplasty with a multimodal pain regimen including intrathecal morphine anesthesia, comparing the rate of pulmonary complications and length of stay between patients previously diagnosed with OSA and those identified as low, moderate, and high risk of undiagnosed OSA established by screening with the STOP-BANG questionnaire in the preoperative setting. RESULTS: Using logistic regression and adjusting for age, gender, and body mass index, the results suggested the rate of complications was not different across the sleep apnea risk groups (P = .4024). In addition, linear regression suggested length of stay did not differ significantly by sleep apnea risk group (P = .2823). CONCLUSION: In patients receiving intrathecal morphine as part of a multimodal pain regimen undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty, neither risk of adverse pulmonary events nor length of stay appeared to correlate with preoperative risk of undiagnosed OSA.

Intrathecal Opioid Therapy for Non-Malignant Chronic Pain: A Long-Term Perspective.

OBJECTIVES: Many patients with intrathecal opioid pumps do adhere to the therapy for many years but there is scarce knowledge about the long-term effects of intrathecal opioid therapy (IOT) of more than three years. We sought to assess the long-term efficacy and the presence of typical side-effects and complications of IOT. METHODS: A chart review was conducted on all patients with intrathecal opioid pumps that had been treated at our institution between 1.11.1990 and 31.12.2014. Information regarding age, gender, diagnosis, age at time of implant, duration of disease, pump type in use, revision operations, and opioid doses over time was recorded. Moreover, a questionnaire was given to the patients containing the following items: pain scores on the NRS with and without IOT, pain related disability, unwanted side-effects of opioid therapy, anxiety, and depression. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (21 m/15 f, mean age 62.9 years, range 30.5-83.9 years, SD 11.0 years) were studied. Mean duration of intrathecal therapy at time of study was 11.8 years. Thirty-two patients had gas-driven pumps and four patients had programmable pumps. The mean actual dose in those patients receiving morphine sulfate was 4.6 mg/day (range 0.2-11.1 mg, SD 2.63 mg). Pain levels prior to pump implantation were 7.98 (NRS) (range 4-10, SD 1.62). Pain levels directly after pump implantation were 4.87 (range 2-7, SD 1.86) and at time of follow-up 4.44 (range 0-9, SD 2.03). The most common unwanted side-effects reported by the patients were fatigue, obstipation, urinary retention, and sexual dysfunction. There was no life-threatening complication or permanent neurological deficit. CONCLUSIONS: IOT seems to be effective also for long-term application. Clinically unwanted side-effects are relatively frequent but not the limiting factor for patient satisfaction.

Targeted Drug Delivery for the Treatment of Abdominal Pain in Chronic Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Case Series.

Abdominal pain secondary to chronic pancreatitis (CP) is difficult to manage and often requires chronic oral opioid therapy (OOT). Targeted drug delivery (TDD) allows for a diminished dose of opioid intake and improved pain levels. TDD has been used in different pain syndromes with only limited reports in CP. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to perform a retrospective review of CP patients treated with TDD versus OOT to compare chronic pain control and consumed morphine-equivalent doses. METHODS: Patients receiving TDD between September 2011 and August 2018 were included. All patients were weaned off oral opioids one week before intrathecal trial and pump implantation. Patients with intrathecal trials providing at least 50% pain relief underwent pump implantation. Data were collected while on OOT and at two weeks, three months, and nine months post-implant. Data were analyzed with Microsoft Excel 365 MSO using means and standard deviations. P-values were calculated using a two-tailed student's t-test with paired two-sample means. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were analyzed. Pre-trial average pain score was 6.5/10 with a mean improvement with trials greater than 71%. The mean chronic baseline oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME) was 188. The mean MME on TDD at two weeks (0.36), three months (1.39), and nine months (2.47) were significantly lower than OOT. Mean pain scores were 6, 4.9, and 5.6 at two weeks, three months, and nine months, respectively, compared to 6.5 on OOT. DISCUSSION: The results of this study indicate that TDD provides improved pain control with significantly lower opioid doses.

Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analyses in Thailand of Continuous Intrathecal Morphine Infusion Compared with Conventional Therapy in Cancer Pain: A 10-year Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Background: Because of the high initial cost of intrathecal drug delivery (ITDD) therapy, this study investigated the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of ITDD therapy in refractory cancer pain management in Thailand over the past 10 years. Methods: The retrospective study was conducted in patients with cancer pain who underwent ITDD therapy from January 2011 to 2021 at three university hospitals. Clinical outcomes included the numerical rating scale (NRS), Palliative Performance Scale, and the EQ-5D. The direct medical and nonmedical as well as indirect costs were also recorded. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses were performed comparing ITDD therapy with conventional therapy (extrapolated from costs of the same patient before ITDD therapy) from a societally oriented economic evaluation. Results: Twenty patients (F:M: 10:10) aged 60 ± 15 years who underwent implantation of an intrathecal percutaneous port (IT port; n = 15) or programmable intrathecal pump (IT pump; n = 5) were included. The median survival time was 78 (interquartile range = 121-54) days after ITDD therapy. At 2-month follow-up, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)/pain reduction of an IT port (US$2065.36 (CA$2829.54)/2-point NRS reduction/lifetime) was lower than for patients with an IT pump (US$5479.26 (CA$7506.58)/2-point NRS reduction/lifetime) compared with continued conventional therapy. The ICER/quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained for an IT port compared with conventional treatment was US$93,999.31(CA$128,799.06)/QALY gained, which is above the cost-effectiveness threshold for Thailand. Conclusion: The cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of IT port therapy for cancer pain was high relative to the cost of living in Thailand, above the cost-effectiveness threshold. Prospective cost analysis studies enrolling more patients with diverse cancers that investigate the benefit of early ITDD therapy with devices over a range of prices are warranted.

Contexte: En raison du coût initial élevé du traitement par administration intrathécale de médicaments (AIM), cette étude a étudié le rapport coût-efficacité et le rapport coût-utilité du traitement par AIM dans la prise en charge de la douleur cancéreuse réfractaire en Thaïlande au cours des 10 dernières années.Méthodes: L'étude rétrospective a été menée auprès de patients souffrant de douleur cancéreuse ayant subi un traitement par AIM de janvier 2011 et 2021 dans trois hôpitaux universitaires. Les résultats cliniques comprenaient l'échelle d'évaluation numérique (EEN), l'échelle de performance palliative et l'EQ-5D. Les coûts médicaux et non médicaux directs et indirects ont également été consignés. Les analyses coûts-efficacité et coût-utilité ont été effectuées en comparant le traitement par AIM au traitement conventionnel (extrapolé à partir des coûts pour le même patient avant le traitement par AIM) à partir d'une évaluation économique sociétale.Résultats: Vingt patients (F : M : 10 : 10) âgés de 60 ± 15 ans ayant subi l'implantation d'un port percutané intrathécal (port IT; n = 15) ou d'une pompe intrathécale programmable (pompe IT; n = 5) ont été inclus. Le temps de survie médian était de 78 jours (intervalle interquartile = 121­54) après le traitement par AIM. À deux mois de suivi, le ratio coût-efficacité incrémental (RCEI/réduction de la douleur d'un port IT (2 065,36 $ US (2 829,54 $ CA) /réduction de 2 points sur l'EEN/durée de vie) était inférieur à celui des patients avec une pompe IT (5479,26 $ US (7506,58 $ CA) /réduction de 2 points sur l'EEN/durée de vie) comparativement au traitement conventionnel en continu. Le RCEI/année de vie pondérée par la qualité (AVPQ) gagnée pour un port IT comparativement au traitement conventionnel était de 93 999,31 $ US (128 799,06 $ CA) /AVPQ gagné, ce qui est au-dessus du seuil de rentabilité pour la Thaïlande.Conclusion: Le rapport coût-efficacité et le rapport coût-utilité du traitement par port IT pour la douleur cancéreuse étaient élevés par rapport au coût de la vie en Thaïlande, soit au-dessus du seuil de rentabilité. Les études d'analyse de coût prospectives portant sur un plus grand nombre de patients atteints de divers cancers qui étudient les avantages des traitements par AIM précoces à l'aide d'appareils de prix différents sont justifiées.

A Comparative Study of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.5% with Morphine and Dexmedetomidine in Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgeries: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: Pain and its alleviation have been a challenge for humans for centuries. Sub arachnoid block is most commonly practiced method for anaesthesia for lower limb surgeries. Adjuvants like opioids and alpha 2 agonists have proven benefits in augmentation of effects of local anaesthetics for spinal anesthesia. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of morphine and dexmedetomidine for sub arachnoid block in lower limb orthopaedic surgeries. Material and Methods: This is a prospective randomised controlled trial done in 120 patients who were posted for lower limb orthopaedic surgery. Along with bupivacaine, Group A received intrathecal dexmedetomidine while group B received intrathecal morphine. Results: the demographic profile was comparable in both the groups. The mean duration of motor block in Group A was 359.33 ± 34.4 and in Group B was 265.71 ± 28.47. The duration of rescue analgesia was almost double in Group A as compared to Group B with P < 0.0001 (CL 95%). Conclusion: Intrathecal dexmedetomidine and morphine both provided good postoperative analgesia. Dexmedetomidine provided a longer duration of analgesia than morphine, thereby increasing the time for first rescue analgesia, but at the cost of greater side effects.

One shot to control Pain: Decreasing postoperative opioid use in gynecologic oncology patients with intrathecal opioid injection.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether regional anesthesia with single-shot intrathecal opioid injections (ITO) reduce postoperative pain and intravenous (IV) opioid use after exploratory laparotomy in major gynecologic surgeries. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 315 consecutive cases of patients who underwent an exploratory laparotomy on the gynecologic oncology service from July 2015 to January 2018 was conducted. Single-shot ITO was offered to all patients undergoing open abdominal surgery. The primary outcomes of interest were IV opioid use in morphine equivalents during the first 48 hours after surgery. Univariate analyses were performed to estimate the effect of ITO on IV opioid use at 0, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after surgery. Longitudinal regression analyses were performed to estimate the effect of ITO on changes in outcomes of interest over time, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: 35% (110/315) received ITO preoperatively. There were no differences in patient age, BMI, previous number of abdominal surgeries, history of opioid dependence, type of gynecologic surgery, or total EBL between the ITO and control groups. Preoperative ITO was associated with a significantly lower IV opioid requirement between 0 and 6 hours after surgery (9.7 ± 8.1 vs 14.3 ± 11.5, p < 0.0001) and between 6 and 12 hours after surgery (2.7 ± 3.8 vs 5.4 ± 9.5, p = 0.0054). There was no statistically significant difference in total hospital stay opioid requirement but median length of stay was increased by 1 day. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative administration of ITO reduced IV opioid requirement in the first 12 hours postoperatively but was associated with median 1 day increase in hospital stay.

Enhanced recovery after surgery with intrathecal opioid in a patient of Gilbert's syndrome undergoing mitral valve replacement.

Gilbert's syndrome, an inherited autosomal dominant disorder, is the most common cause of congenital unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia. We report the anaesthetic management of a 46-year-old female with Gilbert's syndrome operated for mitral valve replacement (MVR), with a special focus on the role of intrathecal opioids.

A survey of neuraxial analgesic preferences in open and laparoscopic major abdominal surgery amongst anaesthetists in Australia and New Zealand.

Practising anaesthetists who are Fellows of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists were surveyed with the objective of gaining insight into current analgesic preferences, with particular regard to neuraxial techniques, when managing patients having major open and laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Major abdominal surgery is common and effective analgesia is fundamental to optimal postoperative recovery. A multitude of analgesic options exist, with epidurals recommended in recent Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols. We believe the place of epidurals is increasingly questioned in the setting of continuous improvement in surgical technique, with increasing laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery. Evidence for various techniques is mixed and benefit-risk profiles exist for all alternatives. An opioid epidemic and abuse crisis has directed attention towards opioid minimisation strategies. The survey was completed by 28% (275) of the 975 Fellows who received it, with good representation across the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists' general membership. Respondents manage laparoscopic major abdominal surgery more frequently than open procedures, with approximately one-third of respondents each providing anaesthesia for two open laparotomies versus four to eight laparoscopic cases per month. Respondents reported a high perceived benefit of neuraxial analgesia, which was discordant with their clinical practice. Less than half of the respondents used epidural or spinal analgesia in open surgery (48% versus 49% of respondents, respectively). A minority (16%) of respondents use a neuraxial technique in major laparoscopic surgery, with a strong preference for intrathecal morphine (74%) when they choose to do so. Further investigation of the role of intrathecal analgesia is warranted given the shift towards laparoscopic major abdominal surgery, the perceived benefits of neuraxial techniques and the need for opioid-sparing analgesic strategies.

Malfunctioning sufentanil intrathecal pain pump: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Sufentanil is a potent opioid uncommonly used to manage pain and is rarely administered via an intrathecal pain pump system. CASE PRESENTATION: This case illustrates the use of intrathecal sufentanil in a 50-year-old Caucasian man for the management of chronic pain; however, the intrathecal drug delivery system experienced a malfunction which led to 1/100th output of the correct dosage. Interesting aspects of this case report include the uncommon choice of sufentanil use for an intrathecal drug delivery system, as well as the unusual pharmacokinetics of this drug. Specifically, this patient did not experience the major withdrawal that would be expected given significant under dosing of opioid, and this may be explained by the lipophilicity and context-sensitive half-times of sufentanil. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the absence of a clinically significant withdrawal in this case report, clinicians must be aware of relevant pharmacokinetic properties and unusual intrathecal drug delivery system technologies that influence a patient's response when device malfunction occurs.

The improved quality of postoperative analgesia after intrathecal morphine does not result in improved recovery and quality of life in the first 6 months after orthopedic surgery: a randomized controlled pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: In orthopedic surgery, it is well known that the use of intrathecal morphine (ITM) leads to an improved quality of postoperative analgesia. Little is known how this improved analgesia affects the long-term course after surgery. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind trial. SETTING: Academic medical center. SUBJECTS: Forty-nine patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement surgery in spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 0.1 mg (n=16) or 0.2 mg (n=16) morphine sulfate intrathecally or physiological saline (n=17) added to 3 mL 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. As a function of the quality of the short-term postoperative analgesia, the effect on recovery and quality of life was evaluated at various time points up to 26 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: In both ITM groups, the additionally required postoperative systemic morphine dose was significantly reduced compared with the placebo group (P=0.004). One week after operation, patients with ITM reported significantly less pain at rest (P=0.01) compared to the placebo group. At discharge, in comparison with the 0.1 mg ITM and placebo group, the 0.2 mg ITM group showed a higher degree of impairment regarding pain, stiffness, and physical function of the respective joint (P=0.02). Over the further follow-up period of 6 months after surgery, recovery and the quality of life did not differ significantly between the three study groups (P>0.2). CONCLUSION: Morphine (0.1 mg) as adjunct to 0.5% bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia is effective to produce a pronounced postoperative analgesia with a beneficial analgesic effect up to 1 week after surgery. With this study design, the different quality of postoperative analgesia had no effect on quality of life and recovery in patients over the 6-month follow-up period. In the medium term, ITM may induce hyperalgesic effects.

Administración prolongada de morfina intratecal por bomba de infusión implantada, en un caso de dolor crónico no oncológico / Prolonged administration of intratecal morphine by infusion pump implanted in a case of non-oncological chronic pain / Administração prolongada de morfina intratecal por bomba de infusão implantada, em caso de dor crônica não oncológica

Introducción: Se describe la evolución de un paciente que recibe morfina intratecal mediante una bomba de infusión, que le fuera implantada hace 14 años para tratamiento de su dolor lumbar crónico post-laminectomía. Material y método: Requería la administración de 60 mg/día de morfina subcutánea que le provocaban efectos secundarios que no toleraba, y múltiples internaciones para control del dolor. Se le implantó una bomba de infusión continua (Isomed) conectada a un catéter subaracnoideo, que libera 1 ml/día, y requiere ser llenada cada 60 días. Resultados: Se observó una disminución del dolor promedio de 50% al año, y de 75% a los 6 y 14 años. Requirió un aumento progresivo de las dosis de llenado, que pasaron de 30 mg de morfina (0.5 mg/día) al inicio, a 40 mg de morfina (0.66 mg /día) al año, a 70 mg de morfina (1.16 mg/día) a los 6 años, a 140 mg (2.33 mg/día) a los 14 años. No se registraron complicaciones médicas graves. Mantuvo constipación y sudoración durante todo el período, e instaló un hipogonadismo secundario con trastornos de la libido y de la erección que fueron corregidos con la administración de testosterona. No requirió más internaciones por dolor. No se observaron complicaciones relacionadas con el funcionamiento o llenado de la bomba, ni vinculadas al catéter. El paciente manifestó estar satisfecho con el implante. Discusión: A pesar del aumento de las dosis de llenado, expresión del desarrollo de tolerancia, las dosis de morfina/día requeridas son francamente inferiores al límite recomendado. Conclusiones: El balance del riesgo-beneficio del implante resultó positivo, considerando el mejor control del dolor logrado, las menores dosis de morfina utilizadas, así como la ausencia de complicaciones graves y de internaciones para control del dolor.

Introduction: The evolution of a patient receiving intrathecal morphine through an infusion pump that was implanted 14 years ago for the treatment of chronic post-laminectomy low back pain is described. Material and method: It required the administration of 60 mg / day of subcutaneous morphine that caused side effects that did not tolerate, and multiple hospitalizations for pain control. He was implanted with a continuous infusion pump (Isomed) connected to a subarachnoid catheter, which releases 1 ml / day, and needs to be filled every 60 days. Results: An average pain decrease of 50% per year, and 75% at 6 and 12 years was observed. It required a progressive increase in filling doses, which went from 30 mg of morphine (0.5 mg / day) at the beginning, to 40 mg of morphine (0.66 mg / day at the first year, to 70 mg of morphine (1.16 mg / day) at the sixth year, at 140 mg (2.33 mg / day) at the fourteen year. No serious medical complications were recorded, he maintained constipation and sweating throughout the period, and installed secondary hypogonadism with libido and erection disorders, that were corrected with the administration of testosterone. No further hospitalizations were required due to pain. No complications were observed related to the operation or filling of the pump or linked to the catheter. The patient stated that he was satisfied with the implant. Discussion: Despite the increase in filling doses, expression of tolerance development, the required morphine / day doses are frankly below the recommended limit. Conclusions: The risk-benefit balance of the implant was positive, considering the best pain control, the lowest doses used, the absence of serious complications, and the lack of hospitalizations for pain control.

Introdução: Descreve-se a evolução de um paciente que recebeu morfina intratecal através de uma bomba de infusão, implantada há 14 anos para o tratamento de lombalgia crônica pós-laminectomia. Material e método: Necessitou de administração de 60 mg/dia de morfina por via subcutânea, que provocou efeitos colaterais intolerantes, e múltiplas internações para controle da dor. Foi implantada uma bomba de infusão contínua (Isomed) conectada a um cateter subaracnóideo, que libera 1 ml/dia, necessitando de reenchimento a cada 60 dias. Resultados: Observou-se redução média da dor de 50% em um ano e 75% em 6 e 14 anos. Foi necessário um aumento progressivo das doses de enchimento, que passaram de 30 mg de morfina (0,5 mg/dia) no início, para 40 mg de morfina (0,66 mg/dia) por ano, para 70 mg de morfina (1,16 mg/dia) dia) aos 6 anos, para 140 mg (2,33 mg/dia) aos 14 anos. Não foram registradas complicações médicas graves. Manteve constipação e sudorese durante todo o período e desenvolveu hipogonadismo secundário com distúrbios de libido e ereção que foram corrigidos com administração de testosterona. Ele não necessitou de mais hospitalizações por dor. Não foram observadas complicações relacionadas à operação ou enchimento da bomba, ou relacionadas ao cateter. O paciente afirmou estar satisfeito com o implante. Discussão: Apesar do aumento das doses de enchimento, expressão do desenvolvimento da tolerância, as doses necessárias de morfina/dia são francamente inferiores ao limite recomendado. Conclusões: A relação risco-benefício do implante foi positiva, considerando o melhor controle da dor alcançado, as menores doses de morfina utilizadas, bem como a ausência de complicações graves e internações para controle da dor.

Effects of Intrathecal Opioids Use in Cesarean Section on Breastfeeding and Newborns' Weight Gaining.

Objective: To assess the association between intrapartum intrathecal opioid use and breastfeeding and weight gain following cesarean section. Materials and methods: The prospective double-blinded study was conducted on term pregnant women, undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. They divided into two groups. In the first group, intrathecal Morphine was used to achieve analgesia during or after the operation. The remainder divided into two subgroups, those who did not receive any opioid or those received systemic opioids. Following labor breastfeeding accessed in a follow-up, two month latter. Results: There was no difference between the demographic variables of the mothers and newborns APGAR score and weight at the time of birth. Breastfeeding rate was similar in intrathecal group in compare with other patents (P value = 0.518). While, the infants' weight at the end of second month was lower in spinal opioid group (P value = 0.036). Conclusion: The present study was the first to suggest that spinal (intrathecal) opioids do not have any impact on breastfeeding. However the relationship between spinal anesthesia on weight gaining needs more investigation.

The comparative study of intravenous Ondansetron and sub-hypnotic Propofol dose in control and treatment of intrathecal Sufentanil-induced pruritus in elective caesarean surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Pruritus is a common and disturbing side effect of neuraxial opioids after cesarean section. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of intravenous ondansetron and sub-hypnotic dose of propofol in control and treatment of intrathecal sufentanil induced pruritus in cesarean surgery. METHODS: Totally, 90 parturient with American Society of Anesthesiology physical status grade I-II, undergoing spinal anesthesia with 2.5 µg sufentanil and 10 mg bupivacaine 0.5% were enrolled to this randomized, prospective, double-blind study. The women were randomly assigned to two groups who received 8 mg ondansetron or 10 mg propofol to treat pruritus grade ≥3. The patient was evaluated after 5 min and in the lack of successful treatment, the doses of two drugs repeated and if the pruritus is on-going, the exact treatment with naloxone was done. FINDINGS: The incidence of pruritus was 69.3%. Both groups were well-matched. The peak time pruritus was 30-75 min after injection. The percentage of individuals consumed naloxone were 6.8% and 15.9% in ondansetron and propofol groups, respectively (P = 0.18). The mean score of satisfaction (according to visual analog scale criteria) was 9.09 ± 1.1 in ondansetron group and 9.3 ± 1.07 in the propofol group (P = 0.39). CONCLUSION: Ondansetrone and sub-hypnotic dose of propofol are both safe and well-tolerated. Due to their same efficacy in the treatment of intrathecal sufentanil-induced pruritus, they can be widely used in clinical practice.