Thirty years of the International Banff Classification for Allograft Pathology: the past, present, and future of kidney transplant diagnostics.

2021 marks the 30th anniversary of the original development of the Banff Classification of Kidney Allograft Pathology, when in August 1991 a group of pathologists and transplant clinicians led by Kim Solez and Lorraine Racusen met in Banff, Alberta, Canada, and established the first widely accepted criteria for the diagnosis of kidney transplant rejection and other lesions seen on kidney allograft biopsies. Since that time, Banff conferences have been held every 2 years at many sites around the world, resulting in several major revisions to the classification and expansion well beyond pure histopathology of kidney allografts to encompass other solid organ transplants, and with involvement of immunogeneticists, immunologists, other basic scientists, biostatisticians, and data scientists defining a very diverse and integrated Banff community. This approach with multidisciplinary international input, constantly incorporating new evidence from the scientific literature and from studies performed by Banff working groups while still maintaining the importance of a long-standing consensus process, has resulted in the Banff classification gaining overwhelming international acceptance as the main reference used for the scoring of kidney allograft biopsies in research studies, routine practice, and clinical trials. This review focuses on the major milestones in the development of the Banff classification of kidney allograft pathology and the evolution of the Banff process over the past 3 decades, with prospects for future advances and refinements.

Risk factors, histopathological features, and graft outcome of transplant glomerulopathy in the absence of donor-specific HLA antibodies.

Transplant glomerulopathy is established as a hallmark of chronic antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant patients with donor-specific HLA antibodies (HLA-DSA). The clinical importance of transplant glomerulopathy in the absence of HLA-DSA is not well established. To help define this, 954 patients (encompassing 3744 biopsies) who underwent kidney transplantation 2004-2013 were studied with retrospective high-resolution HLA genotyping of both donors and recipients. The risk factors, histopathological appearance and prognosis of cases with transplant glomerulopathy in the absence of HLA-DSA were compared to those cases with HLA-DSA, and the impact of the PIRCHE-II score and eplet mismatches on development of transplant glomerulopathy evaluated. In this cohort, 10.3% developed transplant glomerulopathy, on average 3.2 years post-transplant. At the time of glomerulopathy, 23.5% had persistent pre-transplant or de novo HLA-DSA, while 76.5% were HLA-DSA negative. Only HLA-DSA was identified as a risk factor for glomerulopathy development as eplet mismatches and the PIRCHE-II score did not associate. HLA-DSA negative biopsies with glomerulopathy had less interstitial inflammation, less glomerulitis, and less C4d deposition in the peritubular capillaries compared to the HLA-DSA positive biopsies with glomerulopathy. While graft function was comparable between the two groups, HLA-DSA positive glomerulopathy was associated with a significantly higher risk of graft failure compared to HLA-DSA negative glomerulopathy (Hazard Ratio 3.84; 95% confidence interval 1.94-7.59). Landmark analysis three-years post-transplant showed that HLA-DSA negative patients with glomerulopathy still had a significant increased risk of graft failure compared to patients negative for glomerulopathy (2.62; 1.46-4.72). Thus, transplant glomerulopathy often occurs in the absence of HLA-DSA, independent of HLA molecular mismatches, and represents a different phenotype with less concomitant inflammation and better graft survival compared to that developed in the presence of HLA-DSA.

Renal allograft biopsies: a guide of ins and outs for best results.

Renal allograft biopsies remain the best diagnostic tool to investigate the type and degree of graft injury, provide therapeutic and prognostic information and to assess the extent of irreversible chronic organ damage - if done right. This review highlights pertinent aspects relevant not only for collecting optimal tissue samples but also for rendering diagnoses. Pathologists and clinicians are provided with "take home messages" and practical tips what to do, what to avoid and what to keep in mind.

Evolution of human kidney allograft pathology diagnostics through 30 years of the Banff classification process.

The second half of the previous century witnessed a tremendous rise in the number of clinical kidney transplants worldwide. This activity was, however, accompanied by many issues and challenges. An accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of causes of graft dysfunction were and still are, a big challenge. Kidney allograft biopsy played a vital role in addressing the above challenge. However, its interpretation was not standardized for many years until, in 1991, the Banff process was started to fill this void. Thereafter, regular Banff meetings took place every 2 years for the past 30 years. Marked changes have taken place in the interpretation of kidney allograft biopsies, diagnosis, and classification of rejection and other non-rejection pathologies from the original Banff 93 classification. This review attempts to summarize those changes for increasing the awareness and understanding of kidney allograft pathology through the eyes of the Banff process. It will interest the transplant surgeons, physicians, pathologists, and allied professionals associated with the care of kidney transplant patients.

PIRCHE-II scores prove useful as a predictive biomarker among kidney transplant recipients with rejection: An analysis of indication and follow-up biopsies.

Background: Indication biopsies for deterioration of kidney allograft function often require follow-up biopsies to assess treatment response or lack of improvement. Immune-mediated injury, namely borderline rejection (BLR), T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR), or antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), results from preformed or de novo alloreactivity due to donor and recipient HLA-mismatches. The impact of HLA-mismatches on alloreactivity is determined by highly immunogenic HLA-epitopes. Methods: We analyzed 123 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) from 2009 to 2019 who underwent a first indication and a follow-up biopsy. KTRs were divided into three groups according to the first biopsy: No rejection (NR)/BLR (n=68); TCMR (n=21); ABMR (n=34). The HLA-derived epitope-mismatches were calculated using the Predicted Indirectly Recognizable HLA-Epitopes (PIRCHE-II) algorithm. Results: Group NR/BLR: KTRs with higher total PIRCHE-II scores were more likely to develop TCMR in the follow-up biopsy (p=0.031). Interestingly, these differences were significant for both HLA-class I- (p=0.017) and HLA-class II-derived (p=0.017) PIRCHE-II scores. Group TCMR: KTRs with ongoing TCMR in the follow-up biopsy were more likely to show higher total PIRCHE-II scores (median 101.50 vs. 74.00). Group ABMR: KTRs with higher total PIRCHE-II scores were more likely to show an increase in the microvascular inflammation score in the follow-up biopsy. This difference was more pronounced for the HLA-class II-derived PIRCHE-II scores (median 70.00 vs. 31.76; p=0.086). Conclusions: PIRCHE-II scores may prove useful as a biomarker to predict the histopathological changes of immune-related injury from a first indication to a follow-up biopsy. This immunological risk stratification may contribute to individualized treatment strategies.

Tocilizumab in the Treatment of Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection Post Kidney Transplantation: Clinical and Histological Monitoring.

Introduction: Chronic antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR) has very few effective therapeutic options. Interleukin-6 is an attractive target because it is involved in inflammation and humoral immunity. Therefore, the use of tocilizumab (anti-IL6 receptor, TCZ) is a potential valuable therapeutic option to treat cABMR in kidney-transplant (KT) recipients. Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective study included all KT recipients that received monthly TCZ infusions in the setting of cABMR, between August 2018 and July 2021. We assessed 12-month renal function and KT histology during follow-up. Results: Forty patients were included. At 12-months, eGFR was not significantly different, 41.6 ± 17 vs. 43 ± 17 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.102) in patients with functional graft. Six patients (15%) lost their graft: their condition was clinically more severe at the time of first TCZ infusion. Histological follow-up showed no statistical difference in the scores of glomerulitis, peritubular capillaritis, and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA). Chronic glomerulopathy score however, increased significantly over time; conversely arteritis and inflammation in IFTA ares improved in follow-up biopsies. Conclusion: In our study, the addition of TCZ prevented clinical and histological worsening of cABMR in KT recipients, except for more severely ill patients. Randomized studies are needed to clarify the risk/benefit of TCZ in cABMR.