Eumycetoma causative agents are inhibited in vitro by luliconazole, lanoconazole and ravuconazole.

INTRODUCTION: Eumycetoma is a subcutaneous mutilating disease that can be caused by many different fungi. Current treatment consists of prolonged itraconazole administration in combination with surgery. In many centres, due to their slow growth rate, the treatment for eumycetoma is often started before the causative agent is identified. This harbours the risk that the causative fungus is not susceptible to the given empirical therapy. In the open-source drug program MycetOS, ravuconazole and luliconazole were promising antifungal agents that were able to inhibit the growth of Madurella mycetomatis, the most common causative agent of mycetoma. However, it is currently not known whether these drugs inhibit the growth of other eumycetoma causative agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Here, we determined the in vitro activity of luliconazole, lanoconazole and ravuconazole against commonly encountered eumycetoma causative agents. MICs were determined for lanoconazole, luliconazole and ravuconazole against 37 fungal isolates which included Madurella species, Falciformispora senegalensis, Medicopsis romeroi and Trematosphaeria grisea and compared to those of itraconazole. RESULTS: Ravuconazole, luliconazole and lanoconazole showed high activity against all eumycetoma causative agents tested with median minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging from 0.008-2 µg/ml, 0.001-0.064 µg/ml and 0.001-0.064 µg/ml, respectively. Even Ma. fahalii and Me. romeroi, which are not inhibited in growth by itraconazole at a concentration of 4 µg/ml, were inhibited by these azoles. CONCLUSION: The commonly encountered eumycetoma causative agents are inhibited by lanoconazole, luliconazole and ravuconazole. These drugs are promising candidates for further evaluation as potential treatment for eumycetoma.

Anti-inflammatory effect of lanoconazole on 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate- and 2,4,6-trinitrophenyl chloride-induced skin inflammation in mice.

BACKGROUND: Lanoconazole (LCZ) is a topical antifungal agent clinically used to treat fungal infections such as tinea pedis. LCZ has not only antifungal effects but also anti-inflammatory effects, which have the potential to provide additional clinical benefits. However, the characteristic features of the inhibitory effects of LCZ on skin inflammation remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the inhibitory effects of topical application of LCZ, and compared the effects of LCZ with those of other antifungal agents including liranaftate, terbinafine and amorolfine. METHODS: Each antifungal agent was topically applied on 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-induced irritant dermatitis and 2,4,6-trinitrophenyl chloride-induced contact dermatitis in mice (BALB/c). The ear thickness, myeloperoxidase activity and inflammatory mediator contents were evaluated. RESULTS: LCZ dose-dependently suppressed 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-induced irritant dermatitis, suppressed the production of neutrophil chemotactic factors such as keratinocyte-derived chemokine and macrophage inflammatory protein-2, and inhibited neutrophil infiltration to the inflammation site. Moreover, 1% LCZ reduced the ear swelling in mice with 2,4,6-trinitrophenyl chloride-induced contact dermatitis in accordance with the inhibition of interferon-γ production. The inhibitory potency of LCZ on these types of dermatitis in mice was stronger than that of other types of antifungal agents. CONCLUSION: The anti-inflammatory effects of LCZ were exerted through the inhibition of inflammatory mediator production. These effects may contribute to the relief of dermatitis symptoms in patients with tinea pedis.

In-vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of lanoconazole and luliconazole against Aspergillus flavus as an important agent of invasive aspergillosis.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of Aspergillus infections has recently increased remarkably in certain tropical and sub-tropical countries, with Aspergillus flavus being identified as the leading cause of infections after A. fumigatus. Lanoconazole (LAN) and luliconazole (LUL) are currently approved for topical treatment of cutaneous fungal infections. We aimed the in-vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of two imidazole, LAN and LUL against A. flavus. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-seven clinical and environmental A. flavus were tested originating from different climate zones of Iran between 2008 and 2015. The identification of all isolates was confirmed by using PCR-sequencing of ß-tubuline ribosomal DNA gene. In-vitro antifungal susceptibility test was performed using CLSI guidelines against LAN, LUL, itraconazole (ITC), voriconazole (VRC), posaconazole (POS), Isavuconazole (ISA), amphotericin B (AMB), 5-flucytosine (5FC), caspofungin (CAS) and anidulafungin (AFG). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum effect concentration (MEC) values were evaluated according to CLSI M38-A2 guidelines. RESULTS: The geometric mean MICs for tested antifungals, in increasing order, were: 0.009 µg/mL for LUL (ranging from 0.004 to 0.062), 0.02 µg/mL for LAN (ranging from 0.004 to 0.125), POS (0.10), ISA (0.16), ITC (0.24), VRC (0.27), AMB (1.8) and 5FC (63.06) µg/mL. The mean value of MECs for AFG and CAS were 0.06 and 0.07, respectively. CONCLUSION: Overall, LUL and LAN showed the lowest MIC against all isolates of A. flavus. Further studies are required to evaluate the in-vivo efficacy of these agents, and the possibility of using these agents in systemic infections.

Potent Activities of Luliconazole, Lanoconazole, and Eight Comparators against Molecularly Characterized Fusarium Species.

A collection of clinical (n = 47) and environmental (n = 79) Fusarium isolates were tested against 10 antifungal drugs, including 2 novel imidazoles. Luliconazole and lanoconazole demonstrated very low geometric mean MIC values of 0.005 and 0.013 µg/ml, respectively, compared with 0.51 µg/ml for micafungin, 0.85 µg/ml for efinaconazole, 1.12 µg/ml for natamycin, 1.18 µg/ml for anidulafungin, 1.31 µg/ml for voriconazole, 1.35 µg/ml for caspofungin, 1.9 µg/ml for amphotericin B, and 4.08 µg/ml for itraconazole. Results show that these drugs are potential candidates for (topical) treatment of skin and nail infections due to Fusarium species.

In Vitro Activities of Luliconazole, Lanoconazole, and Efinaconazole Compared with Those of Five Antifungal Drugs against Melanized Fungi and Relatives.

The in vitro activities of novel azoles compared to those of five antifungal drugs against clinical (n = 28) and environmental (n = 102) isolates of black mold and melanized yeast were determined. Luliconazole and lanoconazole had the lowest geometric mean MICs, followed by efinaconazole, against tested isolates compared to the other drugs. Therefore, it appears that these new imidazole and triazole drugs are promising candidates for the treatment of infections due to melanized fungi and their relatives.

In vitro activity of new azoles luliconazole and lanoconazole compared with ten other antifungal drugs against clinical dermatophyte isolates.

In vitro susceptibilities of 100 clinical dermatophyte isolates belonging to five species from Iran toward lanoconazole and luliconazole were compared with ten other antifungal agents including econazole, itraconazole, miconazole, fluconazole, griseofulvin, butenafine, terbinafine, caspofungin, anidulafungin and tolnaftate. MIC and MEC values were analyzed according to CLSI M38-A2 document. The isolates were previously identified to the species level using PCR-RFLP on ITS rDNA region. The range of luliconazole and lanoconazole minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) was 0.016-0.032 and 0.063-1 µg/ml, respectively for dermatophyte species. Luliconazole and lanoconazole revealed potent activity against all dermatophyte isolates. Anidulafungin, caspofungin, and luliconazole showed the best activity with the lowest geometric mean 0.01, 0.016, and 0.018 µg/ml, respectively, followed by tolnaftate (0.06 µg/ml), terbinafine (0.07 µg/ml), itraconazole (0.183 µg/ml), butenafine (0.188 µg/ml), econazole (0.20 µg/ml), lanoconazole (0.24 µg/ml), griseofulvin (1.28 µg/ml), miconazole (2.34 µg/ml) and fluconazole (15.34 µg/ml). The current study demonstrated luliconazole and lanoconazole displayed excellent activity against all dermatophyte isolates, although the majority of dermatophyte isolates showed low susceptibility to griseofulvin and very low to miconazole, and fluconazole.

Anti-inflammatory activity of lanoconazole, a topical antifungal agent.

Topical antifungal agents which have anti-inflammatory effects have the potential to provide additional clinical benefits. Therefore, an anti-inflammatory activity of lanoconazole (LCZ), a topical antifungal agent, was investigated against in vitro and in vivo models of inflammation. The release of interleukin-8 (IL-8) from human epidermal keratinocytes stimulated by the addition of 100 µg ml(-1) ß-glucan of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was significantly inhibited by LCZ at the concentration of 10(-5) mol l(-1). The release of interferon-γ and IL-2 from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells stimulated by the addition of 30 and 100 µg ml(-1) phytohemagglutinin was significantly inhibited by LCZ at the concentrations of 10(-7) and 10(-6) mol l(-1), respectively. The increase in the ear thickness induced by topical application of 0.01% 12-O-tetradecanoyl phorbol-13-acetate and 1% 2,4,6-trinitrochlorobenzene (TNCB) after sensitisation with 3% TNCB were established as the mouse models of irritant and contact dermatitis, respectively. Application of 1% and 3% LCZ showed a significant anti-inflammatory activity against both the irritant and contact dermatitis models. These findings suggest that LCZ possesses an anti-inflammatory activity, which may be partially helpful in the treatment of dermatomycoses.

Pharmacokinetics of lanoconazole in human skin after repeated topical application.

Drug disposition after topical application to the skin has not been fully elucidated, especially after repeated application. We conducted a clinical trial to evaluate the pharmacokinetics in the stratum corneum of healthy adults after repeated application of lanoconazole cream as a model drug. We applied 25 mg of 1% lanoconazole cream onto the pre-specified areas on the participants' back once daily for 5 days. The stratum corneum was sampled twice on each study day using a standardized tape-stripping method, and the amount of lanoconazole contained in the samples was quantified using the tandem mass spectrometry method. The obtained data were used to evaluate lanoconazole pharmacokinetics in the stratum corneum. The amount of lanoconazole in the stratum corneum after once daily repeated administration reached a steady state on day 3, and it was eliminated from the stratum corneum with a half-life of approximately 11 h after discontinuing application.