Setting a diagnostic benchmark for tumor BRCA testing: detection of BRCA1 and BRCA2 large genomic rearrangements in FFPE tissue - A pilot study.

PARP inhibitors are used for treatment of tumors lacking function of the double-strand DNA break repair proteins BRCA1 or BRCA2 and are already approved for several cancer types. Thus, it is clinically crucial to determine germline as well as somatic BRCA1/2 mutations in those patients. The amplicon-based Oncomine BRCA1 and BRCA2 Assay is a test routinely used in diagnostics with FFPE specimens. The assay is validated for the detection of mutations, however, data on its performance in detecting large genomic rearrangements in FFPE tissue, is scarce. We cross-validated Oncomine BRCA1 and BRCA2 Assay in blood samples and/or FFPE tissue with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for exon deletions and with OncoScan and an in-house hybridization-based target capture assay (MelArray) with a customized pipeline for the detection of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and heterozygous versus complete gene loss. The Oncomine BRCA1 and BRCA2 Assay could detect both exon deletion and mono- and bi-allelic losses of the BRCA1/2 genes. We show that the therapeutically relevant large genomic rearrangements are reliably detected with the amplicon-based Oncomine BRCA1 and BRCA2 Assay in FFPE tumor tissue. Based on our data, we suggest tumor BRCA testing as standard diagnostic prescreening prior to germline BRCA testing.

The contribution of large genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2 to South African familial breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pathogenic variants that occur in the familial breast cancer genes (BRCA1/2) lead to truncated ineffective proteins in the majority of cases. These variants are mostly represented by small deletions/insertions, nonsense- and splice-site variants, although some larger pathogenic rearrangements occur. Currently, their contribution to familial breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OVC) in South Africa (SA) is unknown. METHODS: Seven hundred and forty-four patients affected with BC or OVC were screened for larger genomic rearrangements (LGRs) by means of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification or Next Generation Sequencing using the Oncomine™ BRCA research assay. RESULTS: The patients represented mostly medium to high-risk families, but also included lower risk patients without a family history of the disease, diagnosed at an early age of onset (< 40 years). Eight LGRs were detected (1.1%); seven in BRCA1 with a single whole gene deletion (WGD) detected for BRCA2. These eight LGRs accounted for 8.7% of the 92 BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants identified in the 744 cases. The pathogenic LGRs ranged from WGDs to the duplication of a single exon. CONCLUSIONS: Larger rearrangements in BRCA1/2 contributed to the overall mutational burden of familial BC and OVC in SA. Almost a quarter of all pathogenic variants in BRCA1 were LGRs (7/30, 23%). The spectrum observed included two WGDs, one each for BRCA1 and BRCA2.

[Detecting Large Germline Rearrangements of BRCA1 by Next Generation Tumor Sequencing].

A majority of BRCA1/2 (BRCA) pathogenic variants (PVs) are single nucleotide substitutions or small insertions/deletions. Copy number variations (CNVs), also known as large genomic rearrangements (LGRs), have been identified in BRCA genes. LGRs detection is a mandatory analysis in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families, if no predisposing PVs are found by sequencing. Next generation sequencing (NGS) may be used to detect structural variation, since quantitative analysis of sequencing reads, when coupled with appropriate bioinformatics tools, is capable of estimating and predicting germline LGRs (gLGRs). However, applying this approach to tumor tissue is challenging, and the pipelines for determination of CNV are yet to be optimized. The aim of this study was to validate the Next Generation Tumor Sequencing (NGTS) technology to detect various gLGRs of BRCA1 locus in surgical tumor tissue samples. In this study, seven different BRCA1 gLGRs, previously found in high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOC) patients, were detected in tumor samples collected from the patients at a time of HGSOC surgery. This study demonstrated that NGS can accurately detect BRCA1 gLGRs in primary tumors, suggesting that gLGR evaluation in BRCA1 locus should be performed in cases when the screening for BRCA alterations starts from tumor instead of blood. NGS sequencing of tumor samples may become the preferred method to detect both somatic and germline gLGRs in BRCA-encoding loci.

Prevalence of BRCA1/2 large genomic rearrangements in Chinese women with sporadic triple-negative or familial breast cancer.

The prevalence of BRCA1/2 large genomic rearrangements (LGRs) and their underlying mechanisms have not been fully evaluated in Chinese women with breast cancer. In this study, we determined the prevalence of BRCA1/2 LGRs in 834 patients with familial breast cancer (FBC) and 660 patients with sporadic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who were negative for BRCA1/2 small-range mutations using the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification method. We found that 20 index patients (2.4%) in the FBC group carried a BRCA1 or BRCA2 LGR, and the frequencies of BRCA1 and BRCA2 LGRs were 1.6% and 0.8%, respectively. Seven index patients (1.1%) carried a BRCA1 LGR in 660 sporadic TNBC patients, whereas no BRCA2 LGRs were found in these patients. Among the BRCA1/2 LGRs, 48.1% (13/27) were novel, and the breakpoints of the majority of the LGRs were identified. ΨBRCA1-mediated homologous recombination (HR) and Alu-mediated HR/non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) accounted for 40% and 30% of the BRCA1 LGRs, respectively. Alu-mediated HR accounted for 71.4% of the BRCA2 LGRs, and the remaining one-third was generated through Long interspersed nuclear elements (LINE)-mediated NHEJ. Our findings suggest that both FBC patients and sporadic TNBC patients should be tested for BRCA1/2 LGRs.

Detection of BRCA1 gross rearrangements by droplet digital PCR.

PURPOSE: Large genomic rearrangements (LGRs) constitute a significant share of pathogenic BRCA1 mutations. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) is a leading method for LGR detection; however, it is entirely based on the use of commercial kits, includes relatively time-consuming hybridization step, and is not convenient for large-scale screening of recurrent LGRs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed and validated the droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay, which covers the entire coding region of BRCA1 gene and is capable to precisely quantitate the copy number for each exon. RESULTS: 141 breast cancer (BC) patients, who demonstrated evident clinical features of hereditary BC but turned out to be negative for founder BRCA1/2 mutations, were subjected to the LGR analysis. Four patients with LGR were identified, with three cases of exon 8 deletion and one women carrying the deletion of exons 5-7. Excellent concordance with MLPA test was observed. Exon 8 copy number was tested in additional 720 BC and 184 ovarian cancer (OC) high-risk patients, and another four cases with the deletion were revealed; MLPA re-analysis demonstrated that exon 8 loss was a part of a larger genetic alteration in two cases, while the remaining two patients had isolated defect of exon 8. Long-range PCR and next generation sequencing of DNA samples carrying exon 8 deletion revealed two types of recurrent LGRs. CONCLUSION: Droplet digital PCR is a reliable tool for the detection of large genomic rearrangements.

Characteristics of BRCA1/2 mutations carriers including large genomic rearrangements in high risk breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: We investigated the prevalence of BRCA1/2 small mutations and large genomic rearrangements in high risk breast cancer patients who attended a genetic counseling clinic. METHODS: In total 478 patients were assessed for BRCA1/2 mutations by direct sequencing, of whom, 306 were identified as non-carriers of BRCA1/2 mutation and assessed for large rearrangement mutations by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Family history and clinicopathological characteristics of patients were evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty-three mutation carriers (13.2%) were identified with BRCA1 mutations (6.3%) and BRCA2 mutations (6.9%), respectively. Mutation frequency was affected by familial and personal factors. Breast cancer patients with family history of breast and ovarian cancer showed the highest prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations (67%), and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients showed high BRCA1 mutation prevalence (25%). The three probands of BRCA1 deletion (1%) represented both familial risk and personal or clinicopathological risk factors as two with TNBC and one with bilateral ovarian cancer. DISCUSSION: This is the largest study assessing large genomic rearrangement prevalence in Korea and BRCA1 deletion frequency was low as 1% in patients without BRCA1/2 small mutations. For clinical utility of large genomic rearrangement testing needs further study.

Characterization of a new BRCA1 rearrangement in an Italian woman with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.

BACKGROUND: We report a novel BRCA1 LGR, involving the complete duplication of exon 3, in an Italian patient with a strong family history of breast and ovarian cancer. Our purpose is to provide an effective characterization of this LGR using a combination of different methods able to establish the exact breakpoints of the duplication. METHODS: MAQ assay was used as primary screening method in LGRs detection. Array CGH, RT-PCR, and Long-PCR were used for a careful characterization of rearrangement and breakpoint regions. The Repeat Masker program was employed to identify Alu sequences at breakpoint junctions. RESULTS: RNA analysis showed that this in tandem duplication of exon 3 causes an in frame insertion of 18 amino acids within the protein. Array CGH and Long-PCR strategies revealed that the duplication (g.100411_102863dup) involves exactly 2.452 nucleotides between intron 2 and intron 3 of the gene. In addition, while an Alu Sx sequence was identified at upstream breakpoint, no Alu repeats were found at downstream junction. This supports the hypothesis that the new duplication was the result of a non-homologous recombination event between Alu and Non-Alu sequences. CONCLUSION: Our strategy, which combines a comprehensive set of methodologies, has been able to characterize the new BRCA1 duplication confirming, as previously reported, that MAQ assay represents a reliable and effective method for a primary screening of BRCA rearrangements. We underline the relevance of incorporating quantitative methods for BRCA genes dosage testing into routine diagnostic practice.

Haplotype analysis reveals that the recurrent BRCA1 deletion of exons 23 and 24 is a Greek founder mutation.

A recurrent large genomic rearrangement (LGR) encompassing exons 23 and 24 of the BRCA1 gene has been identified in breast-ovarian cancer families of Greek origin. Its breakpoints have been determined as c.5406 + 664_*8273del11052 (RefSeq: NM_007294.3) and a diagnostic polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been set up for rapid screening. In a series of 2,092 high-risk families completely screened for BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations, we have found the deletion in 35 families (1.68%), representing 7.83% of the mutations identified in both genes and 10.3% of the total BRCA1 mutations. In order to characterize this deletion as a founder mutation, haplotype analysis was conducted in 60 carriers from 35 families, using three BRCA1 intragenic microsatellite markers and four markers surrounding the BRCA1 locus. Our results demonstrate a common shared core disease-associated haplotype of 2.89Mb. Our calculations estimate that the deletion has originated from a common ancestor 1450 years ago, which most probably inhabited the Asia Minor area. The particular (LGR) is the third mutation of such type that is proven to have a Greek founder effect in the Greek population, illustrating the necessity for LGRs testing in individuals of Greek descent.

Mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2 and other breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in Central and South American populations.

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy among women worldwide. A major advance in the understanding of the genetic etiology of BC was the discovery of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) genes, which are considered high-penetrance BC genes. In non-carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations, disease susceptibility may be explained of a small number of mutations in BRCA1/2 and a much higher proportion of mutations in ethnicity-specific moderate- and/or low-penetrance genes. In Central and South American populations, studied have focused on analyzing the distribution and prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations and other susceptibility genes that are scarce in Latin America as compared to North America, Europe, Australia, and Israel. Thus, the aim of this review is to present the current state of knowledge regarding pathogenic BRCA variants and other BC susceptibility genes. We conducted a comprehensive review of 47 studies from 12 countries in Central and South America published between 2002 and 2017 reporting the prevalence and/or spectrum of mutations and pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 and other BC susceptibility genes. The studies on BRCA1/2 mutations screened a total of 5956 individuals, and studies on susceptibility genes analyzed a combined sample size of 11,578 individuals. To date, a total of 190 different BRCA1/2 pathogenic mutations in Central and South American populations have been reported in the literature. Pathogenic mutations or variants that increase BC risk have been reported in the following genes or genomic regions: ATM, BARD1, CHECK2, FGFR2, GSTM1, MAP3K1, MTHFR, PALB2, RAD51, TOX3, TP53, XRCC1, and 2q35.

Fast Detection of a BRCA2 Large Genomic Duplication by Next Generation Sequencing as a Single Procedure: A Case Report.

The aim of this study was to verify the reliability of a next generation sequencing (NGS)-based method as a strategy to detect all possible BRCA mutations, including large genomic rearrangements. Genomic DNA was obtained from a peripheral blood sample provided by a patient from Southern Italy with early onset breast cancer and a family history of diverse cancers. BRCA molecular analysis was performed by NGS, and sequence data were analyzed using two software packages. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) array was used as confirmatory method. A novel large duplication, involving exons 4-26, of BRCA2 was directly detected in the patient by NGS workflow including quantitative analysis of copy number variants. The duplication observed was also found by CGH array, thus confirming its extent. Large genomic rearrangements can affect the BRCA1/2 genes, and thus contribute to germline predisposition to familial breast and ovarian cancers. The frequency of these mutations could be underestimated because of technical limitations of several routinely used molecular analysis, while their evaluation should be included also in these molecular testing. The NGS-based strategy described herein is an effective procedure to screen for all kinds of BRCA mutations.

Genomic rearrangement screening of the BRCA1 from seventy Iranian high-risk breast cancer families.

BACKGROUND: The second leading cause of cancer deaths in women is breast cancer. Germline mutations in susceptibility breast cancer gene BRCA1 increase the lifetime risk of breast cancer. Eighty-one large genomic rearrangements (LGRs) have been reported up to date in BRCA1 gene, and evaluation of these rearrangements helps with precise risk assessment in high-risk individuals. In this study, we have investigated LGRs in BRCA1 among Iranian high-risk breast cancer families. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy patients with breast cancer who were identified negative for point mutations or small deletions/insertions of BRCA1 gene were selected. Deletions and duplications of BRCA1 gene were evaluated using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). RESULTS: Two deletions, deletion of exons 1A/1B-2 and exon 24, were detected in two patients with breast cancer. The former alteration was found in a woman with a strong family history of breast cancer while the latter one was detected in a woman with early onset of breast cancer. CONCLUSION: Although our data confirm that LGRs in BRCA1 comprise a relatively small proportion of mutations in hereditary breast cancer in the Iranian population, MLPA analysis might be considered for screening of LGRs in high-risk individuals. It is worth to note that our results are consistent with previous studies in various Asian and European countries.

Next-generation sequencing based detection of BRCA1 and BRCA2 large genomic rearrangements in Chinese cancer patients.

BRCA1/2 mutation is a biomarker for guiding multiple solid tumor treatment. However, the prevalence of BRCA1/2 large genomic rearrangements (LGRs) in Chinese cancer patients has not been well revealed partially due to technical difficulties in LGR detection. This study utilized next-generation sequencing (NGS) to analyze the BRCA1/2 mutation profile, including LGR, in 56126 Chinese cancer patients. We also reported that two ovarian and breast cancer patients with NGS-determined BRCA1/2 LGR benefited from PARP inhibitors (PARPi). DNA sequencing identified BRCA1/2 variants (including LGR, pathogenic and likely-pathogenic variants) in 2108 individuals. Seventy patients were discovered to harbor germline LGRs in BRCA1 and 14 had germline LGRs in BRCA2. Among the LGRs detected, exon 1-2 deletion was the predominant LGR (14/70) in BRCA1, and exon 22-24 deletion was the most frequent LGR (3/14) in BRCA2. Notably, the BRCA1 exon 7 deletion was a novel LGR and was identified in six patients, suggesting a specific LGR in Chinese cancer patients. The prevalence analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 LGRs across multiple cancers revealed that BRCA1 LGR more frequently occurred in ovarian cancer (1.31%, 33/2526), and BRCA2 LGR was more commonly seen in cholangiocarcinoma (0.47%, 2/425). Two ovarian and breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 LGR benefited from PARPi therapy. This is the first study to reveal the BRCA1/2 LGR profile of a Chinese pan-cancer cohort by using an NGS-based assay. Two breast and ovarian cancer patients harboring NGS-determined BRCA1/2 LGR benefited from PARPi, indicating that NGS-based detection of BRCA1/2 LGR has the potential to guide PARPi treatment.

Identification of the most common BRCA alterations through analysis of germline mutation databases: Is droplet digital PCR an additional strategy for the assessment of such alterations in breast and ovarian cancer families?

Breast and ovarian cancer represent two of the most common tumor types in females worldwide. Over the years, several non­modifiable and modifiable risk factors have been associated with the onset and progression of these tumors, including age, reproductive factors, ethnicity, socioeconomic status and lifestyle factors, as well as family history and genetic factors. Of note, BRCA1 and BRCA2 are two tumor suppressor genes with a key role in DNA repair processes, whose mutations may induce genomic instability and increase the risk of cancer development. Specifically, females with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer harboring BRCA1/2 germline mutations have a 60­70% increased risk of developing breast cancer and a 15­40% increased risk for ovarian cancer. Different databases have collected the most frequent germline mutations affecting BRCA1/2. Through the analysis of such databases, it is possible to identify frequent hotspot mutations that may be analyzed with next­generation sequencing (NGS) and novel innovative strategies. In this context, NGS remains the gold standard method for the assessment of BRCA1/2 mutations, while novel techniques, including droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), may improve the sensitivity to identify such mutations in the hereditary forms of breast and ovarian cancer. On these bases, the present study aimed to provide an update of the current knowledge on the frequency of BRCA1/2 mutations and cancer susceptibility, focusing on the diagnostic potential of the most recent methods, such as ddPCR.

Detection of BRCA1/2 large genomic rearrangement including BRCA1 promoter-region deletions using next-generation sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) have been conventionally analyzed by Sanger sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Nowadays, next-generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly being used in clinical genetics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of NGS BRCA1/2 assays by comparing them with the conventional method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We did BRCA1/2 NGS assays of 108 breast and/or ovarian cancer patients whose BRCA1/2 mutation had been previously analyzed by Sanger sequencing and MLPA using TruSeq Custom Amplicon Design AFP2. Single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) and small insertions or deletions (InDels) were evaluated. In addition, we analyzed large genomic rearrangements (LGRs) using a coverage-based algorithm as well as a revised BRCA1/2 NGS assay (BRCAaccuTest PLUS), which additionally covered a BRCA1 promoter region. RESULTS: The NGS BRCA1/2 assay detected all 20 SNVs and 21 small InDels in 56 patients. Among seven LGRs detected by MLPA, six exonic LGRs were well identified by both NGS BRCA1/2 assays. One pathogenic LGR, located on a BRCA1 promoter region, was successfully identified using revised BRCAaccuTestPLUS. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicated that an NGS BRCA1/2 assay could detect most LGRs including BRCA1 promoter-region deletion as well as SNVs and small InDels. Therefore, it was applicable to clinical BRCA1/2 mutation tests.

Detection of BRCA1/2 large genomic rearrangements in breast and ovarian cancer patients: an overview of the current methods.

Introduction: Currently, genetic testing of BRCA1/2 genes includes screening for single-nucleotide variants, small insertions/deletions, and copy number variations (CNVs). In fact, many studies document the involvement of BRCA1/2 gene rearrangements in genetic predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer. Large genomic rearrangements (LGRs) of BRCA1 may account for up to one-third of all disease-causing alterations in various populations, while LGRs in BRCA2 are less frequently observed. Areas covered: We aimed to present an overview of current technologies employed in molecular diagnosis of BRCA1/2 LGRs. The most relevant literature papers, showing the application of new strategies, were considered. Expert opinion: Currently, the progress of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies allows for the validation of new pipelines able to provide rapid and effective results, ensuring the sensitivity and specificity requested for the detection of BRCA1/2 LGRs. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification remains the gold standard to confirm NGS CNVs results and to perform fast screening in families where a pathogenic rearrangement has been detected in a proband.

Competitive PCR-High Resolution Melting Analysis (C-PCR-HRMA) for large genomic rearrangements (LGRs) detection: A new approach to assess quantitative status of BRCA1 gene in a reference laboratory.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Evaluation of copy number variation (CNV) in BRCA1/2 genes, due to large genomic rearrangements (LGRs), is a mandatory analysis in hereditary breast and ovarian cancers families, if no pathogenic variants are found by sequencing. LGRs cannot be detected by conventional methods and several alternative methods have been developed. Since these approaches are expensive and time consuming, identification of alternative screening methods for LGRs detection is needed in order to reduce and optimize the diagnostic procedure. The aim of this study was to investigate a Competitive PCR-High Resolution Melting Analysis (C-PCR-HRMA) as molecular tool to detect recurrent BRCA1 LGRs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: C-PCR-HRMA was performed on exons 3, 14, 18, 19, 20 and 21 of the BRCA1 gene; exons 4, 6 and 7 of the ALB gene were used as reference fragments. RESULTS: This study showed that it is possible to identify recurrent BRCA1 LGRs, by melting peak height ratio between target (BRCA1) and reference (ALB) fragments. Furthermore, we underline that a peculiar amplicon-melting profile is associated to a specific BRCA1 LGR. All C-PCR-HRMA results were confirmed by Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. CONCLUSIONS: C-PCR-HRMA has proved to be an innovative, efficient and fast method for BRCA1 LGRs detection. Given the sensitivity, specificity and ease of use, c-PCR-HRMA can be considered an attractive and powerful alternative to other methods for BRCA1 CNVs screening, improving molecular strategies for BRCA testing in the context of Massive Parallel Sequencing.

Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 large genomic rearrangements in Tunisian high risk breast/ovarian cancer families: Implications for genetic testing.

Germline mutations in the BRCA tumor suppressor genes account for a substantial proportion of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. However, this contribution is lower than expected. This underestimation can partly be explained by the BRCA alterations missed by using Sanger sequencing methods. Thus, large genomic rearrangements (LGRs) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are responsible for 4-28% of all inherited BRCA mutations. In this study, Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay was used for detection of large rearrangements of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in 36 unrelated high-risk breast/ovarian cancer patients negative for BRCA1/2 point mutations. MLPA assay for all exons of both genes and for 1100delC variant of CHEK2 gene were performed. Positive MLPA results were confirmed by real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). Two different rearrangements in the BRCA1 gene were identified consisting of exon 5 deletion and exon 20 duplication. MLPA analysis did not reveal any large genomic rearrangements in BRCA2 gene. Overall BRCA1/2 LGRs prevalence among high-risk Tunisian patients was 5.5%. Quantitative real-time PCR confirmed MPLA findings. Our results suggest the usefulness of screening for LGRs in BRCA genes in the Tunisian population. To avoid false-negative results, we suggest that MLPA should be used in genetic testing programs. These results are important for guidance counseling and clinical management of Tunisian high-risk patients.

Mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2 and other breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in Central and South American populations

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy among women worldwide. A major advance in the understanding of the genetic etiology of BC was the discovery of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) genes, which are considered high-penetrance BC genes. In non-carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations, disease susceptibility may be explained of a small number of mutations in BRCA1/2 and a much higher proportion of mutations in ethnicity-specific moderate- and/or low-penetrance genes. In Central and South American populations, studied have focused on analyzing the distribution and prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations and other susceptibility genes that are scarce in Latin America as compared to North America, Europe, Australia, and Israel. Thus, the aim of this review is to present the current state of knowledge regarding pathogenic BRCA variants and other BC susceptibility genes. We conducted a comprehensive review of 47 studies from 12 countries in Central and South America published between 2002 and 2017 reporting the prevalence and/or spectrum of mutations and pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 and other BC susceptibility genes. The studies on BRCA1/2 mutations screened a total of 5956 individuals, and studies on susceptibility genes analyzed a combined sample size of 11,578 individuals. To date, a total of 190 different BRCA1/2 pathogenic mutations in Central and South American populations have been reported in the literature. Pathogenic mutations or variants that increase BC risk have been reported in the following genes or genomic regions: ATM, BARD1, CHECK2, FGFR2, GSTM1, MAP3K1, MTHFR, PALB2, RAD51, TOX3, TP53, XRCC1, and 2q35.