Alzheimer's disease: From immunotherapy to immunoprevention.

Recent Aß-immunotherapy trials have yielded the first clear evidence that removing aggregated Aß from the brains of symptomatic patients can slow the progression of Alzheimer's disease. The clinical benefit achieved in these trials has been modest, however, highlighting the need for both a deeper understanding of disease mechanisms and the importance of intervening early in the pathogenic cascade. An immunoprevention strategy for Alzheimer's disease is required that will integrate the findings from clinical trials with mechanistic insights from preclinical disease models to select promising antibodies, optimize the timing of intervention, identify early biomarkers, and mitigate potential side effects.

Lecanemab blocks the effects of the Aß/fibrinogen complex on blood clots and synapse toxicity in organotypic culture.

Proteinaceous brain inclusions, neuroinflammation, and vascular dysfunction are common pathologies in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Vascular deficits include a compromised blood-brain barrier, which can lead to extravasation of blood proteins like fibrinogen into the brain. Fibrinogen's interaction with the amyloid-beta (Aß) peptide is known to worsen thrombotic and cerebrovascular pathways in AD. Lecanemab, an FDA-approved antibody therapy for AD, clears Aß plaque from the brain and slows cognitive decline. Here, we show that lecanemab blocks fibrinogen's binding to Aß protofibrils, preventing Aß/fibrinogen-mediated delayed fibrinolysis and clot abnormalities in vitro and in human plasma. Additionally, we show that lecanemab dissociates the Aß/fibrinogen complex and prevents fibrinogen from exacerbating Aß-induced synaptotoxicity in mouse organotypic hippocampal cultures. These findings reveal a possible protective mechanism by which lecanemab may slow disease progression in AD.

Disease modifying effects of the amyloid-beta protofibril-selective antibody mAb158 in aged Tg2576 transgenic mice.

Amyloid beta (Aß) peptides, which aggregate to form neocortical plaques in Alzheimer's disease, exist in states that range from soluble monomers and oligomers/protofibrils to insoluble fibrillar amyloid. The present study evaluated the effects of mAb158, a mouse monoclonal antibody version of lecanemab that preferentially binds to soluble Aß protofibrils, in aged transgenic mice (Tg2576) with Aß pathology. Female Tg2576 mice (12 months old) received weekly intraperitoneal mAb158 (35 mg/kg) or vehicle for 4 weeks or for 18 weeks, with or without a subsequent 12-week off-treatment period. Aß protofibril levels were significantly lower in mAb158-treated animals at both 4 and 18 weeks, while longer treatment duration (18 weeks) was required to observe significantly lower Aß42 levels in insoluble brain fractions and lower Aß plaque load. Following the off-treatment period, comparison of the vehicle- and mAb158-treated mice demonstrated that the Aß protofibril levels, insoluble Aß42 levels and Aß plaque load remained significantly lower in mAb158-treated animals, as compared with age-matched controls. However, there was a significant increase of brain accumulation of both the Aß protofibril levels, insoluble Aß42 levels and Aß plaque load after treatment cessation. Thus, repeated mAb158 treatment of aged Tg2576 mice first reduced Aß protofibril levels within 4 weeks of treatment, which then was followed by a reduction of amyloid plaque pathology within 18 weeks of treatment. These effects were maintained 12 weeks after the final dose, indicating that mAb158 had a disease-modifying effect on the Aß pathology in this mouse model. In addition, brain accumulation of both Aß protofibril levels and amyloid pathology progressed after discontinuation of the treatment which supports the importance of continued treatment with mAb158 to maintain the effects on Aß pathology.

People get ready! A new generation of Alzheimer's therapies may require new ways to deliver and pay for healthcare.

The development of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) has progressed over the last decade, and the first-ever therapies with potential to slow the progression of disease are approved in the United States. AD DMTs could provide life-changing opportunities for people living with this disease, as well as for their caregivers. They could also ease some of the immense societal and economic burden of dementia. However, AD DMTs also come with major challenges due to the large unmet medical need, high prevalence of AD, new costs related to diagnosis, treatment and monitoring, and uncertainty in the therapies' actual clinical value. This perspective article discusses, from the broad perspective of various health systems and stakeholders, how we can overcome these challenges and improve society's readiness for AD DMTs. We propose that innovative payment models such as performance-based payments, in combination with learning healthcare systems, could be the way forward to enable timely patient access to treatments, improve accuracy of cost-effectiveness evaluations and overcome budgetary barriers. Other important considerations include the need for identification of key drivers of patient value, the relevance of different economic perspectives (i.e. healthcare vs. societal) and ethical questions in terms of treatment eligibility criteria.

How promising are the latest monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid-ß for the treatment of early Alzheimer's disease?

INTRODUCTION: Monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid-ß are the first disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer disease to have received FDA-approval. There are three different drugs approved or pending FDA-approval: aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab. These three drugs are each in different stages of regulatory approval by the FDA. AREAS COVERED: We discuss the development of these drugs, the data regarding their clinical efficacy, their dosing regimens, and side effects. In addition, we examine pragmatic issues with their potential implementation as common treatments to slow the rate of decline in Alzheimer disease, and what unanswered questions remain regarding this new class of drugs. EXPERT OPINION: We conclude that these new monoclonal antibodies that target amyloid-ß represent a genuine advance in the treatment of Alzheimer disease. However, questions remain regarding their clinical significance. Additionally, it is presently unclear which patients would most benefit from these expensive drugs given the risk of side effects and the logistical difficulties concerning administration and the determination of eligibility.

Clinically Important Benefits and Harms of Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting Amyloid for the Treatment of Alzheimer Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate clinically meaningful benefits and harms of monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid in patients with Alzheimer dementia. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and 5 trial registries, as well as the reference lists of identified studies. We included randomized controlled trials comparing a monoclonal antibody with placebo at a dose consistent with that used in phase 3 trials or for Food and Drug Administration approval. Studies had to report at least 1 clinically relevant benefit or harm. Data were extracted independently by at least 2 researchers for random effects meta-analysis. Changes in cognitive and functional scales were compared between groups, and each difference was assessed to determine if it met the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). RESULTS: We identified 19 publications with 23,202 total participants that evaluated 8 anti-amyloid antibodies. There were small improvements over placebo in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS)-Cog-11 to -14 score (standardized mean difference = -0.07; 95% CI, -0.10 to -0.04), Mini Mental State Examination score (0.32 points; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.50), and Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes scale score (mean difference =-0.18 points; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.03), and the combined functional scores (standardized mean difference = 0.09; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.13). None of the changes, including those for lecanemab, aducanumab, and donanemab, exceeded the MCID. Harms included significantly increased risks of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA)-edema (relative risk [RR] = 10.29; number needed to harm [NNH] = 9), ARIA-hemorrhage (RR = 1.74; NNH = 13), and symptomatic ARIA-edema (RR = 24.3; NNH = 86). CONCLUSIONS: Although monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid provide small benefits on cognitive and functional scales in patients with Alzheimer dementia, these improvements are far below the MCID for each outcome and are accompanied by clinically meaningful harms.

The amyloid cascade hypothesis: an updated critical review.

Results from recent clinical trials of antibodies that target amyloid-ß (Aß) for Alzheimer's disease have created excitement and have been heralded as corroboration of the amyloid cascade hypothesis. However, while Aß may contribute to disease, genetic, clinical, imaging and biochemical data suggest a more complex aetiology. Here we review the history and weaknesses of the amyloid cascade hypothesis in view of the new evidence obtained from clinical trials of anti-amyloid antibodies. These trials indicate that the treatments have either no or uncertain clinical effect on cognition. Despite the importance of amyloid in the definition of Alzheimer's disease, we argue that the data point to Aß playing a minor aetiological role. We also discuss data suggesting that the concerted activity of many pathogenic factors contribute to Alzheimer's disease and propose that evolving multi-factor disease models will better underpin the search for more effective strategies to treat the disease.

The efficacy and safety of lecanemab 10 mg/kg biweekly compared to a placebo in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Alzheimer's disease, prevalent in individuals aged 60 and above, constitutes most dementia cases and significantly impairs memory and cognitive functions. With global Alzheimer's cases projected to triple by 2050, there is a pressing need for effective interventions. Lecanemab, a monoclonal antibody targeting amyloid-beta plaques, shows promise in slowing Alzheimer's progression. Positive clinical trial results have instilled hope in patients, prompting ongoing research to advance understanding and intervention possibilities. To contribute to this knowledge base, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, focusing on lecanemab's efficacy and safety at a dosage of 10 mg/kg. This comprehensive approach aimed to address gaps in the current literature, scrutinize research disparities, and guide future investigations. Applying strict inclusion/exclusion criteria, we assessed study details, participant information, and intervention specifics, using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for quality evaluation. Statistical analyses, conducted with R software, included risk ratios and mean differences, assessing heterogeneity and publication bias. The meta-analysis reveals a significant positive effect of lecanemab (10 mg/kg biweekly) on cognitive outcomes in Alzheimer's disease. Consistent reductions in ADCOMS, CDR-SB, and ADAS-cog14 scores across studies indicate drug efficacy with narrow confidence intervals and no significant heterogeneity. While TEAE shows no significant difference, heightened risks of ARIA-E and ARIA-H associated with lecanemab underscore the need for vigilant safety monitoring in clinical practice. Despite the drug efficacy, the study emphasizes a balanced assessment of benefits and potential risks associated with lecanemab, providing critical insights for clinicians evaluating its use in addressing cognitive impairment in individuals with Alzheimer's disease.

The Single Toxin Origin of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Neurodegenerative Disorders Enables Targeted Approach to Treatment and Prevention.

New data suggest that the aggregation of misfolded native proteins initiates and drives the pathogenic cascade that leads to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other age-related neurodegenerative disorders. We propose a unifying single toxin theory of brain neurodegeneration that identifies new targets and approaches to the development of disease-modifying treatments. An extensive body of genetic evidence suggests soluble aggregates of beta-amyloid (Aß) as the primary neurotoxin in the pathogenesis of AD. New insights from fluid biomarkers, imaging, and clinical studies provide further evidence for the decisive impact of toxic Aß species in the initiation and progression of AD. Understanding the distinct roles of soluble and insoluble amyloid aggregates on AD pathogenesis has been the key missing piece of the Alzheimer's puzzle. Data from clinical trials with anti-amyloid agents and recent advances in the diagnosis of AD demonstrate that the driving insult in biologically defined AD is the neurotoxicity of soluble Aß aggregates, called oligomers and protofibrils, rather than the relatively inert insoluble mature fibrils and amyloid plaques. Amyloid oligomers appear to be the primary factor causing the synaptic impairment, neuronal stress, spreading of tau pathology, and eventual cell death that lead to the clinical syndrome of AD dementia. All other biochemical effects and neurodegenerative changes in the brain that are observed in AD are a response to or a downstream effect of this initial toxic insult by oligomers. Other neurodegenerative disorders follow a similar pattern of pathogenesis, in which normal brain proteins with important biological functions become trapped in the aging brain due to impaired clearance and then misfold and aggregate into neurotoxic species that exhibit prion-like behavior. These aggregates then spread through the brain and cause disease-specific neurodegeneration. Targeting the inhibition of this initial step in neurodegeneration by blocking the misfolding and aggregation of healthy proteins has the potential to slow or arrest disease progression, and if treatment is administered early in the course of AD and other neurodegenerative disorders, it may delay or prevent the onset of clinical symptoms.

Repurposing drugs against Alzheimer's disease: can the anti-multiple sclerosis drug fingolimod (FTY720) effectively tackle inflammation processes in AD?

Therapeutic approaches providing effective medication for Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients after disease onset are urgently needed. Previous studies in AD mouse models and in humans suggested that physical exercise or changed lifestyle can delay AD-related synaptic and memory dysfunctions when treatment started in juvenile animals or in elderly humans before onset of disease symptoms. However, a pharmacological treatment that can reverse memory deficits in AD patients was thus far not identified. Importantly, AD disease-related dysfunctions have increasingly been associated with neuro-inflammatory mechanisms and searching for anti-inflammatory medication to treat AD seems promising. Like for other diseases, repurposing of FDA-approved drugs for treatment of AD is an ideally suited strategy to reduce the time to bring such medication into clinical practice. Of note, the sphingosine-1-phosphate analogue fingolimod (FTY720) was FDA-approved in 2010 for treatment of multiple sclerosis patients. It binds to the five different isoforms of Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors (S1PRs) that are widely distributed across human organs. Interestingly, recent studies in five different mouse models of AD suggest that FTY720 treatment, even when starting after onset of AD symptoms, can reverse synaptic deficits and memory dysfunction in these AD mouse models. Furthermore, a very recent multi-omics study identified mutations in the sphingosine/ceramide pathway as a risk factor for sporadic AD, suggesting S1PRs as promising drug target in AD patients. Therefore, progressing with FDA-approved S1PR modulators into human clinical trials might pave the way for these potential disease modifying anti-AD drugs.

Commentaries: Lecanemab: pioneering the way as the first approved drug for Alzheimer's disease treatment.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder marked by cognitive decline and neuronal abnormalities. Current therapies address symptoms without altering disease progression. Lecanemab, an anti-amyloid antibody, binds to amyloid-beta (Aß) protofibrils. Phase II trials revealed dose-dependent amyloid clearance and reduced clinical decline. Phase III trials demonstrated cognitive benefits with potential adverse events. Full FDA approval was granted for lecanemab due to its ability to eliminate toxic brain amyloids. However, longer trials are needed to assess its efficacy and safety. While lecanemab marks a significant advancement, further breakthroughs are essential for effective AD treatment.

Lecanemab: A Humanized Monoclonal Antibody for the Treatment of Early Alzheimer Disease.

OBJECTIVE: To review current pharmacology, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of lecanemab in patients with Alzheimer disease. DATA SOURCES: A literature search of PubMed (April 1, 2016-November 15, 2023) and ClinicalTrials.gov search were conducted using the following search terms: lecanemab and BAN2401. Additional articles were identified by hand from references. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: We included English-language clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, reviews, and systematic reviews evaluating lecanemab pharmacology, efficacy, or safety in humans for the management of Alzheimer disease. DATA SYNTHESIS: In the Clarity AD phase III trial, lecanemab led to a decrease in brain amyloid levels and showed moderate improvement in clinical measures of cognition and function. At 18 months, lecanemab 10 mg/kg biweekly exhibited a lower least squares mean change from baseline (1.21) compared to placebo (1.66) of Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes score, signifying a significant difference of -0.45 (95% CI, -0.67 to -0.23; P < 0.001). In a subset of 698 participants, lecanemab reduced brain amyloid burden by -59.1 Centiloids (95% CI, -62.6 to -55.6). Lecanemab demonstrated favorable differences in Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale 14, Alzheimer Disease Composite Score, and Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study-Mild Cognitive Impairment-Activities of Daily Living scores. Adverse events included infusion-related reactions (26.4%) and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (12.6%). RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Lecanemab reduces cognitive decline but raises concerns about intravenous administration, cost, and magnetic resonance imaging needs. Ongoing trials exploring subcutaneous dosing and positron emission tomography scans may offer solutions. CONCLUSION: Lecanemab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that is selective for soluble amyloid-beta (Aß) aggregates. Lecanemab has exhibited a decrease in brain Aß plaques and moderately less decline on clinical measures of cognitive function.

Development of a quantitative semi-mechanistic model of Alzheimer's disease based on the amyloid/tau/neurodegeneration framework (the Q-ATN model).

INTRODUCTION: A quantitative model of Alzheimer's disease (AD) based on the amyloid/tau/neurodegeneration biomarker framework (Q-ATN model) was developed to sequentially link amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), tau PET, medial temporal cortical thickness, and clinical outcome (Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes; CDR-SB). METHODS: Published data and biologically plausible mechanisms were used to construct, calibrate, and validate the model. Clinical trial simulations were performed for different anti-amyloid antibodies, including a 5-year simulation of subcutaneous gantenerumab treatment. RESULTS: The simulated time-course of biomarkers and CDR-SB was consistent with natural history studies and described the effects of several anti-amyloid antibodies observed in trials with positive and negative (or non-significant) outcomes. The 5-year simulation predicts that the beneficial effects of continued anti-amyloid treatment should increase markedly over time. DISCUSSION: The Q-ATN model offers a novel approach for linking amyloid PET to CDR-SB, and provides theoretical support for the potential clinical benefit of anti-amyloid therapy. HIGHLIGHTS: A semi-mechanistic model was developed to link amyloid/tau/neurodegeneration biomarkers to clinical outcome (Q-ATN model). The Q-ATN model describes the disease progression seen in natural history studies. Model simulations agree well with mean data from the aducanumab EMERGE study. A 5-year simulation of gantenerumab predicts greater benefit with longer treatment.

Elevated soluble amyloid beta protofibrils in Down syndrome and Alzheimer's disease.

Down syndrome (DS) is caused by trisomy of chromosome 21, which leads to a propensity to develop amyloid ß (Aß) brain pathology in early adulthood followed later by cognitive and behavioral deterioration. Characterization of the Aß pathology is important to better understand the clinical deterioration of DS individuals and to identify interventive strategies. Brain samples from people with DS and Alzheimer's disease (AD), as well as non-demented controls (NDC), were analyzed with respect to different Aß species. Immunohistochemical staining using antibodies towards Aß was also performed. Elevated levels of soluble Aß protofibrils and insoluble Aßx-40 and Aßx-42 in formic acid brain extracts, and elevated immunohistochemical staining of Aß deposits were demonstrated with the antibody BAN2401 (lecanemab) in DS and AD compared with NDC. These data and the promising data in a large phase 2 CE clinical trial with lecanemab suggest that lecanemab may have the potential to preserve cognitive capacity in DS. Lecanemab is currently in a phase 3 CE clinical trial.

High-clearance anti-amyloid immunotherapies in Alzheimer's disease. Part 2: putative scenarios and timeline in case of approval, recommendations for use, implementation, and ethical considerations in France.

In 2021, aducanumab, an immunotherapy targeting amyloid-ß, was approved for Alzheimer's disease (AD) by the US Food and Drug Administration thanks to positive results on a putative biological surrogate marker. This approval has raised an unprecedented controversy. It was followed by a refusal of the European Medicine Agency, which does not allow the marketing of drugs solely on biological arguments and raised safety issues, and important US coverage limitations by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Two other anti-amyloid immunotherapies showed significant results regarding a clinical outcome in phase II trials, and five drugs are being studied in phase III trials. Lecanemab is currently under examination for an 'Accelerated Approval' in the US, with an expected decision in January 2023. The common feature and novelty of these anti-amyloid immunotherapies, compared to those tested in previous trials of the 2010s, is their ability to induce a high clearance of amyloid load, as measured with positron emission tomography, in the brain of early-stage biomarker-proven AD patients. In the first part of this review, we underlined through a meta-analysis that the pooled data from high-clearance anti-amyloid immunotherapies trials demonstrated a significant but slight clinical effect after 18 months. Still, safety remains an issue with serious and symptomatic amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, which are seldom (∼1 per 200 treated patients) but occur beyond chance. In the second part of this review, we hypothesized that there is a high probability that some phase III trials of high-clearance anti-amyloid immunotherapies in early AD will finally be unarguably positive on clinical outcomes in the next five years with acceptable safety data. This may, in turn, lead to approval by the European Medicine Agency if the risk-benefit profile is deemed favorable. Such approval would be a game-changer in managing AD patients and for the organization of memory clinics in France. We review the possible timeline and scenarios for putative approval in France and make propositions regarding putative use in clinical practice, putative implementation in a real-life setting, and ethical considerations.

High-clearance anti-amyloid immunotherapies in Alzheimer's disease. Part 1: Meta-analysis and review of efficacy and safety data, and medico-economical aspects.

In 2021, aducanumab, an immunotherapy targeting amyloid-ß, was approved for Alzheimer's disease (AD) by the US Food and Drug Administration thanks to positive results on a putative biological surrogate marker. This approval has raised an unprecedented controversy. It was followed by a refusal of the European Medicine Agency, which does not allow the marketing of drugs solely on biological arguments and raised safety issues, and important US coverage limitations by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Two other anti-amyloid immunotherapies showed significant results regarding a clinical outcome in phase 2 trials, and five drugs are being studied in phase 3 trials. Compared to those tested in previous trials of the 2010s, the common feature and novelty of these anti-amyloid immunotherapies is their ability to induce a high clearance of amyloid load, as measured with positron emission tomography, in the brain of early-stage biomarker-proven AD patients. Here, we review the available evidence regarding efficacy and safety data and medico-economical aspects for high-clearance anti-amyloid immunotherapies. We also perform frequentist and Bayesian meta-analyses of the clinical efficacy and safety of the highest dose groups from the two aducanumab phase 3 trials and the donanemab and lecanemab phase 2 trials. When pooled together, the data from high-clearance anti-amyloid immunotherapies trials confirm a statistically significant clinical effect of these drugs on cognitive decline after 18 months (difference in cognitive decline measured with CDR-SB after 18 months between the high dose immunotherapy groups vs. placebo = -0.24 points; P=0.04, frequentist random-effect model), with results on ADAS-Cog being the most statistically robust. However, this effect remains below the previously established minimal clinically relevant values. In parallel, the drugs significantly increased the occurrence of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities-edema (ARIA-E: risk ratio=13.39; P<0.0001), ARIA-hemorrhage (risk ratio=2.78; P=0.0002), and symptomatic and serious ARIA (7/1321=0.53% in the high dose groups versus 0/1446 in the placebo groups; risk ratio=6.44; P=0.04). The risk/benefit ratio of high-clearance immunotherapies in early AD is so far questionable after 18 months. Identifying subgroups of better responders, the perspective of combination therapies, and a longer follow-up may help improve their clinical relevance. Finally, the preliminary evidence from medico-economical analyses seems to indicate that the current cost of aducanumab in the US is not in reasonable alignment with its clinical benefits.

Neurotoxic Soluble Amyloid Oligomers Drive Alzheimer's Pathogenesis and Represent a Clinically Validated Target for Slowing Disease Progression.

A large body of clinical and nonclinical evidence supports the role of neurotoxic soluble beta amyloid (amyloid, Aß) oligomers as upstream pathogenic drivers of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Recent late-stage trials in AD that have evaluated agents targeting distinct species of Aß provide compelling evidence that inhibition of Aß oligomer toxicity represents an effective approach to slow or stop disease progression: (1) only agents that target soluble Aß oligomers show clinical efficacy in AD patients; (2) clearance of amyloid plaque does not correlate with clinical improvements; (3) agents that predominantly target amyloid monomers or plaque failed to show clinical effects; and (4) in positive trials, efficacy is greater in carriers of the ε4 allele of apolipoprotein E (APOE4), who are known to have higher brain concentrations of Aß oligomers. These trials also show that inhibiting Aß neurotoxicity leads to a reduction in tau pathology, suggesting a pathogenic sequence of events where amyloid toxicity drives an increase in tau formation and deposition. The late-stage agents with positive clinical or biomarker data include four antibodies that engage Aß oligomers (aducanumab, lecanemab, gantenerumab, and donanemab) and ALZ-801, an oral agent that fully blocks the formation of Aß oligomers at the clinical dose.

Use of lecanemab for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: The US Food and Drug Administration authorized lecanemab for the therapeutic use of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in January 2023. To assess the effectiveness and safety of lecanemab in treating AD, we thoroughly examined the studies that are currently accessible. METHOD: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis recommendations were followed. In order to find relevant studies on lecanemab, we carried out a thorough literature search utilizing the electronic databases MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, and Scopus. Excluding any research using experimental animals, we looked at lecanemab's effectiveness and side effects in treating AD in human clinical trials. Three randomized controlled studies were included. FINDINGS: According to studies, lecanemab lessens clinical deterioration and reduces brain amyloid-beta plaques (difference,.45; 95% confidence interval,.67 to.23; p < .001). Participants who received lecanemab saw a greater frequency of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA)-H (17.3% vs. 9.0%) and ARIA-E (12.6% vs. 1.7%), which is a significant adverse outcome. CONCLUSION: Lecanemab has been shown to have an impact on the two primary pathophysiologic indicators of AD (Aß and tau). There are still a lot of unresolved issues related to lecanemab. Future research on the effectiveness and safety of lecanemab is advised in order to determine that the advantages of this medication exceed the disadvantages.

Lecanemab: A Second in Class Therapy for the Management of Early Alzheimer's Disease.

The Food and Drug Administration granted traditional approval of lecanemab for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Lecanemab is a humanized anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody directed towards Aß protofibrils. Lecanemab is the only drug that targets Aß soluble protofibrils and has shown statistical differences in mild AD or mild cognitive impairment. In its landmark phase III trial, lecanemab was shown to slow the progression of clinical decline, and a reduction in amyloid protein accumulation. The difference in mean CDR-SOB score improvement between the treatment and placebo groups was -0.45, of which the clinical significance could be argued. Amyloid burden was also considerably reduced as well, but the true clinical consequence of this reduction remains to be seen. This beneficial impact on daily living is offset by rare but serious side effects including amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) causing cerebral edema (ARIA-E) or cerebral microhemorrhages or hemosiderin deposits (ARIA-H). Benefits of therapy must be considered against the risk of cerebral microhemorrhages and edema. Affordability must also be taken into consideration. The current estimated yearly cost for twice monthly lecanemab infusion is $26,500. In addition to the significant cost challenges, the frequent infusions may pose concerns related to access. Additional agents within this class are in the pipelines with possibly increased efficacy or decreased adverse events.