Exploring the predictive value of combined ultrasound parameters for spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in cesarean section: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic vasopressor infusion can effectively assist with fluid loading to prevent spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension. However, the ideal dose varies widely among individuals. We hypothesized that hypotension-susceptible patients requiring cesarean section (C-section) could be identified using combined ultrasound parameters to enable differentiated prophylactic medical interventions. METHODS: This prospective observational trial was carried out within a regional center hospital for women and children in Sichuan Province, China. Singleton pregnant women undergoing combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for elective C-sections were eligible. Women with contraindications to spinal anesthesia or medical comorbidities were excluded. Velocity time integral (VTI) and left ventricular end-diastolic area (LVEDA) in the supine and left lateral positions were measured on ultrasound before anesthesia. Stroke volume, cardiac output, and the percentage change (%) in each parameter between two positions were calculated. Vital signs and demographic data were recorded. Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension was defined as a mean arterial pressure decrease of > 20% from baseline. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to analyze the associations of ultrasound measurements, vital signs, and demographic characteristics with spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension. This exploratory study did not have a predefined outcome; however, various parameter combinations were compared using the AUROC to determine which combined parameters had better predictive values. RESULTS: Patients were divided into the normotension (n = 31) and hypotension groups (n = 57). A combination of heart rate (HR), LVEDAs, and VTI% was significantly better at predicting hypotension than was HR (AUROC 0.827 vs. 0.707, P = 0.020) or LVEDAs (AUROC 0.827 vs. 0.711, P = 0.039) alone, but not significantly better than VTI% alone (AUROC 0.827 vs. 0.766, P = 0.098). CONCLUSION: The combined parameters of HR and LVEDAs with VTI% may predict spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension more precisely than the single parameters. Future research is necessary to determine whether this knowledge improves maternal and neonatal outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1900025191.

Combination of Static Echocardiographic Indices for the Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Coronary Surgery: A Pilot Study.

We investigated the role of echocardiographic indices consisting of left ventricular end-diastolic area (LVEDA) in combination with Doppler-derived surrogates of diastolic compliance and filling (E/E', E'/S', E'/A'; early transmitral flow velocity (E), tissue Doppler-derived early (E') diastolic, late (A') diastolic, or peak systolic (S') velocity of the mitral annulus) in predicting fluid responsiveness in off-pump coronary surgery. Hemodynamic and echocardiographic variables were prospectively assessed under general anesthesia before and after a fluid challenge of 6 mL/kg during apnea at atmospheric pressure in 64 patients with LV ejection fraction ≥40%. Forty patients (63%) were fluid responders (≥15% increase in stroke volume index). E/E' and E'/S' could predict fluid responsiveness with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.85; p = 0.006) and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.54-0.82; p = 0.017), respectively. The combination of LVEDA and E/E' showed incremental predictive ability for fluid responsiveness compared with LVEDA (AUROC, 0.60; p = 0.170) or pulse pressure variation (AUROC, 0.70; p = 0.002), yielding the highest AUROC of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.66-0.90; p < 0.001). The combined index of echocardiographic variables reflecting LV dimension (LVEDA) and diastolic compliance and filling (E/E') is a potentially useful predictor of fluid responsiveness.

Left ventricular vortex analysis by high-frame rate blood speckle tracking echocardiography in healthy children and in congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: High-frame rate blood speckle tracking (BST) echocardiography is a new technique for the assessment of intracardiac flow. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of left ventricular (LV) vortices in healthy children and in those with congenital heart disease (CHD). METHODS: Characteristics of LV vortices were analyses based on 4-chamber BST images from 118 healthy children (median age 6.84 years, range 0.01-17 years) and 43 children with CHD (median age 0.99 years, range 0.01-14 years). Both groups were compared after propensity matching. Multiple linear regression was used to identify factors that independently influence vortex characteristics. RESULTS: Feasibility of vortex imaging was 93.7% for healthy children and 95.6% for CHD. After propensity matching, there were no overall significant differences in vortex distance to apex, distance to interventricular septum (IVS), height, width, sphericity index, or area. However, multiple regression analysis revealed significant associations of LV morphology with vortex characteristics. Furthermore, CHD involving LV volume overload and CHD involving LV pressure overload were both associated with vortices localized closer to the IVS. CONCLUSIONS: LV vortex analysis using high-frame rate BST echocardiography is feasible in healthy children and in those with CHD. As they are associated with LV morphology and are modified in some types of CHD, vortices might yield diagnostic and prognostic value. Future studies are warranted to establish applications of vortex imaging in the clinical setting.

Sonographic Evaluation of Internal Jugular Vein Diameter and Cross-sectional Area Measurements in Correlation with Left Ventricular End Diastolic Area as a Tool for Perioperative Assessment of Volume Status in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.

AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the ultrasound estimation of the cross-sectional area (CSA) and diameter of internal jugular vein (IJV) with left ventricular end diastolic area (LVEDA) for the assessment of intravascular volume in pediatric patients during cardiac surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The CSA and diameter of the left IJV were defined, using ultrasound machine, and compared with LVEDA, estimated by transesophageal echo, in four times intervals (immediately after induction [T1], before the start of cardiopulmonary bypass [CPB] [T2], immediately after weaning of CPB [T3], and at the end of surgery before transfer to the Intensive Care Unit [T4]) as a tool for intravascular volume assessment in 16 pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery. RESULTS: There was a poor correlation between IJV CSA and diameter with LVEDA. r values were 0.158, 0.265, 0.449, and 0.201 at the four time intervals (T1, T2, T3, and T4), respectively. CONCLUSION: Estimation of the CSA and diameter of the left IJV using ultrasound is not reliable and cannot be used alone to decide further management.