Simultaneous Approach of Colo-Rectal and Hepatic Lesions in Colo-Rectal Cancers with Liver Metastasis - A Single Oncological Center Overview.

Introduction: Management of synchronous colorectal cancer with liver metastases (SCLM) is still on debate, regarding timing, indications and complications of the 3 strategies: classic approach (first tumor resection), simultaneous resection and reverse approach (liver first). A retrospective single-centre evaluation of synchronous approach was accomplished, focusing on surgical technique, indications and complications. Material and Methods: Between 2017 and 2020, 31 SCLM patients benefited from synchronously colorectal and hepatic approach: segmental colectomies/rectal resections, simultaneously with liver metastasectomies (associated with radiofrequency ablation). Post-therapeutic imaging monitoring was performed from every 3 - 6 months. There were no perioperative complications related to the combination of the procedures, low morbidity and zero postoperative mortality. Results: The follow-up period was 10 - 40 months: 13 patients had no evidence of recurrence, 10 had hepatic metastases in regression, 4 patients had signs of peritoneal carcinomatosis and 4 showed progression of liver disease; all patients were on chemotherapy. During follow-up 4 patients died. Conclusions: Experience shows that the simultaneous approach of recto-colic and hepatic resections in colo-rectal cancers is a safe procedure, with low morbidity, the limits being dictated by the size of the liver metastases. The results at long-distance must be drawn by further consistent trials.

Case report: Drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in liver metastasis and retroperitoneal lymph node metastases of renal cell carcinoma: effective local therapy with the first report.

The liver is the fourth most common site of metastasis in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), which is usually treated with systemic therapies and local treatments. However, local treatments are challenging in RCC patients with liver metastasis who failed in first-line systemic therapy. Here, we report a case of a patient with both liver-dominant RCC metastasis and recurrence in the operative site who had failed in first-line targeted therapy plus immunotherapy, received drug-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE), and achieved a complete response.

Neuroendocrine liver metastasis from the small intestine: Is surgery beneficial for survival?

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine neoplasia of the small intestine (siNEN) are frequently diagnosed with liver metastases. The impact of the presence of liver metastases on overall survival and the necessity of surgery for liver metastasis is discussed controversially. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the overall long-term survival of patients with siNENs with and without liver metastasis at initial diagnosis and the possible benefit of surgical treatment as compared to active surveillance of metastases. 123 consecutive patients with siNENs were treated between 1965 and 2016. All clinical and histological records were reevaluated including analysis of the proliferation rates in all specimens. The 1-, 5-, 10- and 20-year overall survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis for patients with and without liver metastasis and according to the type of treatment (surgical vs. surveillance) of liver metastases if present. RESULTS: The 1-, 5-, 10- and 20-year overall survival rate was 89.0%, 68.4%, 52.8% and 31.0% in patients without and 89.5%, 69.5%, 33.2% and 3.6% in those with liver metastases. No statistically significant differences were observed comparing the two groups. Within the group of patients with liver metastases, the type of treatment (surgical vs. surveillance) was in favor of patients undergoing surgery. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of liver metastases upon diagnosis was an individual risk factor associated with worse survival. CONCLUSION: The presence of liver metastasis at initial diagnosis does not have a statistically significant influence on survival. Surgery for hepatic metastasis seems to show a benefit for overall survival and may be indicated especially in patients symptomatic due to high tumor burden and serotonin hypersecretion to reduce hormone activity.

Effect of KRAS and NRAS mutations on the prognosis of patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer presenting with liver-only and lung-only metastases.

It has been reported that 20-25% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) have metastases at the time of diagnosis. Liver and lung are the most common metastatic sites. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association of KRAS and NRAS mutations with clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with initial liver-metastasis only (LiM-only) or lung-metastasis only (LuM-only) metastatic CRC (mCRC). Overall, 166 patients with CRC with initial LiM-only (n=124) and LuM-only (n=42) were retrospectively analyzed from January 2014 to December 2017. The median follow-up time was 19.2 months (1.0-57.1 months). Patient characteristics at diagnosis were collected. Genomic DNA was isolated from frozen primary CRC tissues for targeting KRAS and NRAS. Patients with LuM-only were significantly older compared with those with LiM-only (65.5 vs. 61.5 years; P=0.05). There was no significant differences between the LiM-only and LuM-only groups in terms of sex, location of the primary tumor, serum carcinoembryonic antigen level, histological grade and RAS mutation status. KRAS mutations were detected in 43 (41.0%) patients with LiM-only and 13 (35.1%) patients with LuM-only. The overall survival time (OS) of LuM-only was more favorable compared with that of patients with LiM-only (44.5 vs. 24.7 months); however, there was no significant difference (P=0.095). The progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in the RAS wild-type group were significantly improved compared with the RAS mutant cohorts (P=0.004 and P=0.031, respectively) in the LiM-only group. In patients with stage IV CRC, those with synchronous LiM-only mCRC had a higher incidence of metastasis but a less favorable PFS and OS compared with patients with LuM-only. RAS mutation status exhibited a significant association with the survival outcome in patients with LiM-only mCRC.