The Analgesic Effect of Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Median Sternotomy Cardiac Surgery in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the analgesic effect of erector spinae plane block in adults undergoing median sternotomy cardiac surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING: The Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed databases from inception to January 2024 were searched. The study has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023470375). PARTICIPANTS: Eight randomized controlled trials involving 543 patients, comparing with no block or sham block, were included, whether it was a single injection or continuous. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcomes were pain scores and opioid consumption. Erector spinae plane block reduced pain scores immediately after extubation (mean difference [MD], -1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.67 to -0.71; p for heterogeneity = 0.10), at 6 hours after extubation (MD, -1.96; 95% CI, -2.85 to -1.08; p for heterogeneity < 0.0001), and at 12 hours after extubation (MD, -0.98; 95% CI, -1.55 to -0.40; p for heterogeneity < 0.00001). The decrease in pain scores reached the minimal clinically important difference within 6 hours. Opioid consumption 24 hours after surgery decreased by 35.72 mg of oral morphine equivalents (95% CI, -50.88 to -20.57; p for heterogeneity < 0.0001). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of results. The quality of primary outcomes was rated as very low to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Erector spinae plane block decreased pain scores within 12 hours after extubation, reached the minimal clinically important difference within 6 hours, and decreased opioid consumption 24 hours after surgery, based on data of very low to moderate quality. However, high-quality randomized controlled trials are necessary to validate these findings.

Biomechanical comparison of bone staple fixation methods with suture material for median sternotomy closure using 3D-printed bone models.

AIM: To compare the biomechanical properties of three different sternal closure techniques in a 3D-printed bone model of a sternum from a 30-kg dog. METHODS: Median sternotomy was performed on a total of 90 three-dimensional (3D) copies of a polycarbonate (PC) model of a sternum, generated from the CT images of the sternum of a 30-kg German Shepherd dog. Three different methods were used to repair the sternotomies: polydioxanone suture (group PDS, n = 30), stainless steel bone staples (group SS, n = 30), and nitinol bone staples (group NS, n = 30). Each repair method was tested by applying tensile force in one of three ways (longitudinally, laterally, or torsionally) resulting in a sample size of n = 10 for each repair method-loading combination. In all experiments, the loads at 1-mm and 2-mm gap formation, failure, and the displacement at the failure point were measured. RESULTS: In lateral distraction and longitudinal shear tests, NS and SS staple repairs required application of significantly greater force than PDS across all displacement criteria (1 and 2 mm). NS exhibited significantly greater failure load than PDS. In torsion tests, NS required significantly greater application of force compared to SS or PDS at all displacement criteria (1 and 2 mm) and exhibited a greater failure load than PDS. In terms of displacement at failure point, PDS suture showed more displacement than SS or NS across all experiments (laterally, longitudinally, torsionally). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, bone staples were mechanically superior to PDS suture in median sternotomy closure using 3D-printed bone model in terms of 1-mm, 2-mm displacement loads, and displacement at failure. NS had a higher failure load than PDS under lateral, longitudinal, and torsional distraction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These study results imply that bone staples can be considered as an alternative surgical method for median sternotomy closure in dogs.

Effect of right anterolateral thoracotomy versus median sternotomy on postoperative wound tissue repair in patients with congenital heart disease: A meta-analysis.

Right anterolateral thoracotomy (RAT) and median sternotomy (MS) are two major methods for treatment of congenital cardiac disease. But there are various types of surgery that provide a better operative outcome for the patient. Therefore, we carried out a meta-analysis to investigate the effects of these two methods in the treatment of wound tissue, hospitalization and so on, to find out which surgery method could provide the best short-term effect. In this research, we chose an English controlled trial from 2003 to 2022 to evaluate the influence of right anterolateral thoracotomy and median sternotomy on the short-term outcome of Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), time of operation, time spent in the hospital, and the time of scar formation. Our findings suggest that the RAT method was associated with a shorter surgical scars for congenital heart disease operations compared to MS with respect to post-operation scars (WMD, 3.55; 95% CI, 0.04, 7.05; p = 0.05). The RAT method is better suited to the needs of patients who care about their injuries. Nevertheless, in addition to other surgery related factors which might affect post-operative wound healing, we discovered that MS took a shorter time to perform CPB compared with RAT surgery (WMD, - 1.94; 95% CI, -3.39, -0.48; p = 0.009). Likewise, when it comes to the time taken to perform surgery, MS needs less operational time compared to RAT methods (WMD, -12.84; 95% CI, -25.27, -0.42; p = 0.04). On the other hand, the time needed for MS to recover was much longer compared to the RAT (WMD, 0. 60; 95% CI, 0.02, 1.18; p = 0.04). This indicates that while RAT is advantageous in terms of shortening the duration of post-operative scar, it also increases the time needed for surgical operations and CPB.

Clinical Comparative Analyses of Thymectomy Between Subxiphoid and Subcostal Arch Thoracoscopic Resection and Median Sternotomy for the Treatment of Thymoma With Myasthenia Gravis in Chinese Patients.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to retrospectively compare the efficacy and safety of subxiphoid and subcostal arch thoracoscopic resection (SR) and the median sternotomy (MS) for thymoma with myasthenia gravis (MG) via propensity-matched analysis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 502 patients with thymoma and MG in Tangdu Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University from December 2012 to December 2017. The patients were allocated to SR group (n = 424) and MS group (n = 78). Perioperative outcomes were compared between SR group and MS group by using propensity-matched analysis. RESULTS: All SR and MS operations were accomplished successfully. Most postoperative outcomes between the two groups showed no significant difference such as remission of MG and postoperative complication (P > 0.05). There were statistically significant differences between MS group and SR group in operation time [(116.3 ± 33.7) min versus (52.2 ± 31.3) min], intraoperative blood loss [(145.2 ± 26.7) mL versus (51.2 ± 10.3) mL], chest drainage duration (3.4 d versus 0 d), days of hospital-stay (5.2 d versus 2.7 d), patient satisfaction score (5.9 ± 2.3 versus 8.7 ± 1.2), the incidence of complications and pain scores, with all P values < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that subxiphoid and subcostal arch thoracoscopic resection is a less invasive procedure with good safety and feasibility as compared with median sternotomy for thymoma with myasthenia gravis.

Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional isolated aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the early and mid-term outcome of patients undergoing conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) versus minimally invasive via hemi-sternotomy aortic valve replacement (MIAVR). METHODS: A single centre retrospective study involving 653 patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) either via conventional AVR (n = 516) or MIAVR (n = 137) between August 2015 and March 2020. Using pre-operative characteristics, patients were propensity matched (PM) to produce 114 matched pairs. Assessment of peri-operative outcomes, early and mid-term survival and echocardiographic parameters was performed. RESULTS: The mean age of the PM conventional AVR group was 71.5 (±8.9) years and the number of male (n = 57) and female (n = 57) patients were equal. PM MIAVR group mean age was 71.1 (±9.5) years, and 47% of patients were female (n = 54) and 53% male (n = 60). Median follow-up for PM conventional AVR and MIAVR patients was 3.4 years (minimum 0, maximum 4.8 years) and 3.4 years (minimum 0, maximum 4.8 years), respectively. Larger sized aortic valve prostheses were inserted in the MIAVR group (median 23, IQR = 4) versus conventional AVR group (median 21, IQR = 2; p = 0.02, SMD = 0.34). Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time was longer with MIAVR (94.4 ± 19.5 minutes) compared to conventional AVR (83.1 ± 33.3; p = 0.0001, SMD = 0.41). Aortic cross-clamp (AoX) time was also longer in MIAVR (71.6 ± 16.5 minutes) compared to conventional AVR (65.0 ± 52.8; p = 0.0001, SMD = 0.17). There were no differences in the early post-operative complications and mortality between the two groups. Follow-up echocardiographic data showed significant difference in mean aortic valve gradients between conventional AVR and MIAVR groups (17.3 ± 8.2 mmHg vs 13.0 ± 5.1 mmHg, respectively; p = 0.01, SMD = -0.65). There was no significant difference between conventional AVR and MIAVR in mid-term survival at 3 years (88.6% vs 92.1%; log-rank test p = 0.31). CONCLUSION: Despite the longer CPB and AoX times in the MIAVR group, there was no significant difference in early complications, mortality and mid-term survival between MIAVR and conventional AVR.

Comment on: "Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block for perioperative pain management in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery".

This article (Correspondence) is in response to the recently published article on the role of Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block for cardiac procedures by Zhang et al. in "BMC Anesthesiology". I greatly appreciate the authors for publishing this study in which Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block, a novel technique for providing pain relief in open cardiac surgical procedures was evaluated. I wish to present my reflections on this article as well as to add a few more points on this topic.

Erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block and superficial parasternal intercostal plane (S-PIP) + ESP block in acute post-sternotomy pain following cardiac surgery. METHODS: Forty-seven patients aged between 18 and 80 years of age with American Society of Anesthesiologists class II-III due to undergo median sternotomy for cardiac surgery were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Following randomization into two groups, one group received bilateral ultrasound-guided ESP and the other S-PIP plus ESP block. Morphine consumption within the first 24 h after surgery was the primary outcome of the study while NRS scores at rest, NRS scores when coughing, time taken until extubation, use of rescue analgesic, presence of nausea/vomiting, length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and patient satisfaction were secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Morphine use up to 24 h following surgery was statistically significantly different between the ESP block and ESP + S-PIP block groups (18.63 ± 6.60 [15.84-21.41] mg/24 h vs 14.41 ± 5.38 [12.08-16.74] mg/24 h, p = 0.021). The ESP + S-PIP block group had considerably reduced pain scores compared to the ESP block group across all time points. Rescue analgesics were required in 21 (87.5%) patients in the ESP block group and seven (30.4%) in the ESP + S-PIP group (p < 0.001). PONV, length of stay in the ICU and hospital, and time to extubation were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In open cardiac surgery, the combination of ESP and S-PIP blocks lowers pain scores and postoperative morphine requirement of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials Registration No: NCT05191953, Registration Date: 14/01/2022.

Mid-term outcomes of right subaxillary approach versus median sternotomy incision for ventricular septal defect with patent ductus arteriosus.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate and compare two surgical approaches to repair ventricular septal defect (VSD) with patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and to explore the patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of all patients who had surgical repair of VSD and PDA between 2013 and 2015 using the right subaxillary approach (group A) or the median sternotomy incision (group B). The outcomes of both techniques were compared. Paediatric QoL Inventory 4.0 scale was applied to assess patients' HRQoL in the 6th postoperative year. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to explore factors associated with higher HRQoL scores. RESULTS: A total of 128 patients were included (group A, n = 70 and group B, n = 58). Patients in group A were older and heavier than patients in group B. In group B, the diameters of VSD and PDA were larger and the pulmonary artery pressures were higher than those in group A (p < 0.001). No mortality occurred on a mean follow-up of 8.3 ± 1.2 years. Patients in group A had higher HRQoL scores than those in group B in terms of emotional and social functioning dimensions. The right subaxillary approach (OR: 3.56; 95% CI 1.65-5.46), higher parents' education level (OR: 1.62; 95% CI 0.65-2.31), and better family economic status (OR: 1.48; 95% CI 0.79-2.45) were associated with higher HRQoL scores. CONCLUSIONS: Younger and smaller patients receiving median sternotomy incisions due to large defects and pulmonary hypertension had lower HRQoL scores. The right subaxillary approach, higher parents' education level, and better family economic status were associated with higher HRQoL scores.

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Pecto-intercostal Fascial Block and Transversus Thoracic Muscle Plane Block for Acute Poststernotomy Pain Management After Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to evaluate morphine consumption and pain scores 24 hours postoperatively to compare the effects of a bilateral pectointercostal fascial block (PIFB) with those of a transversus thoracic muscle plane block (TTMPB) on acute poststernotomy pain in cardiac surgery patients who have undergone median sternotomy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded. SETTING: The operating room, intensive care unit, and patient ward at a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine American Society of Anesthesiologists II-to-III patients aged 18- to-80 years, scheduled for elective cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients randomly were allocated to groups scheduled to receive bilateral ultrasound-guided PIFB or TTMPB. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was postoperative morphine use within the first 24 hours. Secondary outcomes were the numerical pain rating scale (NRS) scores at rest and during coughing, time of first analgesic demand from the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device, and rescue analgesia use. The nausea/vomiting scores, time to extubation, length of stays in intensive care and the hospital, patient satisfaction scores, and complications were also recorded. The first 24-hour morphine use did not significantly differ between the PIFB and TTMPB groups (mean ± standard deviation [95% CI], 13.89 ± 6.80 [10.83-16.95] mg/24 h and 15.08 ± 7.42 [11.83-18.33] mg/24 h, respectively, p = 0.608). No significant difference between the two groups in the NRS scores at rest and during coughing was observed; the groups had similar requirements for rescue analgesia in the first 24 hours (n [%], three [15.8] and seven [35], p = 0.273, respectively). The time from PCA to the first analgesia request was longer in the PIFB than in the TTMPB group (median [interquartile range], 660 [540-900] minutes, and 240 [161-525] minutes, respectively, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: PIFB and TTMPB showed similar effectiveness for morphine consumption within 24 hours postoperatively and in pain scores in cardiac surgery patients.

A case report of an extremely rare type of cardiac tumor: Primary cardiac angiofibroma.

Cardiac angiofibroma is a very rare diagnosis when a patient develops an intracardiac mass. It is a primary benign cardiac tumor with a scarcity of information in the literature. This case report illustrates a 26-year-old man with a complaint of chronic chest tightness who was first diagnosed with right ventricle tumor by echocardiography then underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) which confirmed the presence of a highly-vascular tumor with radiologically benign behavior. Then his tumor was excised, his postoperative course was uncomplicated and he was well within almost 2 months after discharge. Ultimately the histopathologic findings demonstrated vascular and stromal tissue in favor of angiofibroma and excluded the other diagnoses with immunohistochemical and trichrome staining. Angiofibroma is a benign, highly vascular tumor, mostly discovered in the nasopharynx. When it is found in the heart, CMR and pathology are pivotal to rule in its diagnosis. It is isointense in T1 weighted and hyperintense in T2 weighted sequences with intense enhancement following contrast injection. Its pathology contains an admixture of vasculatures with CD31 positive immunoreactivity for endothelial cells and fibrotic tissue with bluish coloration in trichrome staining. Eventually, its treatment includes merely surgical excision given its benign nature.

THERMOACTIVE NITINOL CLIPS AS PRIMARY AND SECONDARY STERNAL CLOSURE AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY - FIRST EXPERIENCE IN SLOVENIA.

Although there has been a trend towards minimally invasive and sternum-sparing procedures, median sternotomy is still a standard surgical approach in cardiac surgery. Many techniques and innovations for closure of sternal osteotomy have been developed with contradictory results. In this report, we present our first experience with the nitinol-made sternal closure system in the primary, as well as secondary closure of sternal osteotomy. A small series of 20 patients had their sternotomy closed with Flexigrip clips. In one case, the Flexigrip clips were used in secondary wound closure in a patient with deep sternal wound infection after full sternotomy and coronary bypass surgery. After 6-month follow-up, all patients were doing well with their sternums clinically stable and the sternotomy wounds completely healed. In conclusion, Flexigrip clips offered a stable alternative to steel wires in primary, as well as secondary sternal closure. Moreover, in secondary sternal closure, the thermoactive clips offered safety advantages over the standard wire cerclage technique because the need for dissection of the substernal adhesions could be avoided.

Ultrasound-guided parasternal intercostal nerve block for postoperative analgesia in mediastinal mass resection by median sternotomy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided parasternal intercostal nerve block is rarely used for postoperative analgesia, and its value remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided parasternal intercostal nerve block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing median sternotomy for mediastinal mass resection. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, enrolled 41 participants aged 18-65 years. The patients scheduled for mediastinal mass resection by median sternotomy were randomly assigned were randomized into 2 groups, and preoperatively administered 2 injections of ropivacaine (PSI) and saline (control) groups, respectively, in the 3rd and 5th parasternal intercostal spaces with ultrasound-guided (USG) bilateral parasternal intercostal nerve block. Sufentanil via patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was administered to all participants postoperatively. Pain score, total sufentanil consumption, and postoperative adverse events were recorded within the first 24 h. RESULTS: There were 20 and 21 patients in the PSI and control group, respectively. The PSI group required 20% less PCIA-sufentanil compared with the control group (54.05 ± 11.14 µg vs. 67.67 ± 8.92 µg, P < 0.001). In addition, pain numerical rating scale (NRS) scores were significantly lower in the PSI group compared with control patients, both at rest and upon coughing within 24 postoperative hours. Postoperative adverse events were generally reduced in the PSI group compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: USG bilateral parasternal intercostal nerve block effectively reduces postoperative pain and adjuvant analgesic requirement, with good patient satisfaction, therefore constituting a good option for mediastinal mass resection by median sternotomy.

In Silico Analysis of Elastomer-Coated Cerclage for Reducing Sternal Cut-Through in High-Risk Patients.

BACKGROUND: AISI 316 L stainless steel wire cerclage routinely used in sternotomy closure causes lateral cut-through damage and fracture, especially in cases of high-risk patients, which leads to postoperative complications. A biocompatible elastomer (Pellethane®) coating on the standard wire is proposed to mitigate the cut-through effect. METHODS: Simplified peri-sternal and transsternal, sternum-cerclage contact models are created and statically analyzed in a finite element (FE) software to characterize the stress-reduction effect of the polymer coating for thicknesses between 0.5 and 1.125 mm. The performance of the polymer-coated cerclage in alleviating the detrimental cortical stresses is also compared to the standard steel cerclage in a full sternal closure FE model for the extreme cough loading scenario. RESULTS: It was observed via the simplified contact simulations that the cortical stresses can be substantially decreased by increasing the coating thickness. The full closure coughing simulation on the human sternum further corroborated the simplified contact results. The stress reduction effect was found to be more prominent in the transsternal contacts in comparison to peri-sternal contacts. CONCLUSIONS: Bearing in mind the promising numerical simulation results, it is put forth that a standard steel wire coated with Pellethane will majorly address the cut-through complication.

Outcomes of redo-isolated tricuspid valve surgery after left-sided valve surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To compare early and long-term outcomes of redo-isolated tricuspid surgery (RITS) after left-sided valve surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 173 patients who underwent RITS for severe tricuspid regurgitation after previous left-sided valve surgery from January 1999 to December 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: RITS by median sternotomy (m-RITS; n = 78) and totally endoscopic approach (e-RITS; n = 95). Perioperative outcomes and follow-up results were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 19 (11%) in-hospital deaths (14.1% in m-RITS and 8.4% in e-RITS, p = .234) that decreased from 16.7% (1999-2014) to 6.9% (2015-2019) (p = .044). Tricuspid valve replacement (odds ratio [OR] = 4.989, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.133-29.790, p = .041) and NYHA function class IV (OR = 9.611, 95% CI: 2.102-43.954, p = .004) were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality. The overall 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates were 97.2% (95% CI: 94.5%-99.9%), 80.3% (95% CI: 71.7%-88.9%), 59.2% (95% CI: 43.5%-75.5%), and 49.3% (95% CI: 27.2%-71.4%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing RITS carry a high risk of early mortality. There was no significant difference in early mortality or long-term survival between the endoscopy and median sternotomy, whereas the endoscopy approach was associated with shorter intensive care unit stays and fewer reoperations. Repair resulted in lower surgical mortality than replacement with acceptable residual tricuspid regurgitation.

Location and Patterns of Persistent Pain Following Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the specific clinical features of pain following cardiac surgery and evaluate the information derived from different pain measurement tools used to quantify and describe pain in this population. METHODS: A prospective observational study was undertaken at two tertiary care hospitals in Australia. Seventy-two (72) adults (mean age, 63±11 years) were included following cardiac surgery via a median sternotomy. Participants completed the Patient Identified Cardiac Pain using numeric and visual prompts (PICP), the McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form version 2 (MPQ-2) and the Medical Outcome Study 36-item version 2 (SF-36v2) Bodily Pain domain (BP), which were administered prior to hospital discharge, 4 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Participants experienced a high incidence of mild (n=45, 63%) to moderate (n=22, 31%) pain prior to discharge, which reduced at 4 weeks postoperatively: mild (n=28, 41%) and moderate (n=5, 7%) pain; at 3 months participants reported mild (n=14, 20%) and moderate (n=2, 3%) pain. The most frequent location of pain was the anterior chest wall, consistent with the location of the surgical incision and graft harvest. Most participants equated "pressure/weight" to "aching" or a "heaviness" in the chest region (based on descriptor of pain in the PICP) and the pain topography was persistent at 4 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. Each pain measurement tool provided different information on pain location, severity and description, with significant change (p<0.005) over time. CONCLUSION: Mild-to-moderate pain was frequent after sternotomy, improved over time and was mostly located over the incision and mammary (internal thoracic) artery harvest site. Persistent pain at 3 months remained a significant problem in the community within this surgical population.

Adding herbal extracts to silicone gel on post-sternotomy scar: a prospective randomised double-blind study.

OBJECTIVE: Silicone gel has been shown effective in improving healing post-sternotomy scars. It remains to be determined whether adding herbal extracts to the gel would augment the healing effect. METHOD: After median sternotomy, patients were randomised into two groups. Group 1: topical silicone gel plus herbal extract gel (Allium cepa, Centella Asiatica, Aloe vera and Paper Mulberry) and Group 2: silicone gel. Patients were treated for six months. The postoperative scars were assessed at three and six months by plastic surgeons using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the patient assessment scar scale. RESULTS: Each group comprised 23 patients (n=46 in total). The VSS was significantly lower in Group 1 than in Group 2 (p=0.018 and p=0.051, respectively). In Group 1, the four differences from baseline were vascularity scores at three and six months (-0.391, p=0.025; -0.435, p=0.013, respectively), and pigmentation scores at three and six months (-0.391, p=0.019; -0.609, p=0.000, respectively). In Group 2, differences from baseline were the pigmentation and vascularity score at six months (-0.6609, p=0.000; -0.348, p=0.046, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest, post-sternotomy scars trend to have better vascularity and pigmentation when treated with silicone gel plus herbal extracts.

Resistance Training Following Median Sternotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Despite no evidence to support weight limitations following median sternotomy, sternal precautions continue to be routinely prescribed. Moreover, international cardiac rehabilitation guidelines lack sufficient detail for the implementation of resistance training. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine what the literature defines as resistance training; how resistance training is applied, progressed and evaluated; and, whether resistance training improves physical and functional recovery postoperatively in the cardiac surgical population. DATA SOURCES: Five (5) electronic databases were searched from inception to 28 September 2018 for studies published in English that investigated the effects of a resistance training intervention on physical and functional recovery following median sternotomy. RESULTS: Eighteen (18) trials (n=3,462) met eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. Seven (7) randomised controlled trials shared common outcome measures, allowing meta-analysis. The performance of resistance training appears to be safe and feasible, and resulted in similar improvements in both cardiopulmonary capacity and anthropometry, when compared to aerobic training alone. However, the definition and application of resistance training is frequently a lower intensity and volume than recommended by the American College of Sports Medicine. Furthermore, sternal precautions are not reflective of the kinematics and weights used when performing many activities of daily living. For this reason, resistance training needs to be task-specific, reflecting functional tasks to promote recovery. CONCLUSION: Resistance training, in isolation or when combined with aerobic training, may lead to greater improvements in physical and functional recovery following cardiac surgery via median sternotomy; however, further research is required to inform clinical guidelines.

Use of freeze-dried bone allografts in osteoporotic patients undergoing median sternotomy.

Osteoporosis is a major risk factor for deep sternal wound infection, which is a rare but serious complication after median sternotomy. We investigated the incidence of deep sternal wound infection and the protective effect of bone allografts in osteoporotic patients after sternal approximation. Data were collected retrospectively from consecutive osteoporotic patients who underwent cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. Sternal approximation in the historical control group was performed with conventional steel wire sutures. Subsequent patients underwent conventional wire suturing plus bone allografting to reinforce the sternum. Perioperative management was standardized between groups. Demographics, risk factors, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Between January 2010 and March 2017, 284 patients underwent sternal approximation after sternotomy at our hospital. Sternal closure was completed with conventional wire sutures in the first 148 patients (Group A) and with conventional wire sutures plus bone allografting in the subsequent 136 patients (Group B). Baseline characteristics were comparable, with no significant differences between groups. Bone allografting was associated with less postoperative drainage and shorter duration of chest pain. The incidence of deep sternal wound infection was significantly lower in Group B than Group A (0.7 vs. 4.7%, P = 0.042), as was the incidence of sternal instability (0.7 vs. 7.4%, P = 0.043). Bone allografting was a reliable adjuvant method for sternal closure, associated with reduced risk of deep sternal wound infection among osteoporotic patients. Its benefits should be confirmed in larger studies.