Comparison between the WHO-CFICPS and the PRISMA classification of safety-related events in a radiation oncology department.

INTRODUCTION: Describing Safety-Related Events (SREs) in a radiotherapy (RT) department and comparing WHO-CFICPS (World Health Organization's Conceptual Framework For The International Classification For Patient Safety) and PRISMA (Prevention and Recovery Information System for Monitoring and Analysis) methods for classifying SREs. METHODS: From February 2017 to October 2020, two Quality Managers (QMs) randomly classified 1173 SREs using 13 incident types of WHO-CFICPS. The same two QMs, reclassified the same SREs according to 20 PRISMA incident codes. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the association between the 13 incident types of WHO-CFICPS and the 20 PRISMA codes. The chi-squared and post-hoc tests using adjusted standardized residuals were applied to detect the association between the two systems. RESULTS: There was a significant association between WHO-CFICPS incident types and PRISMA codes (P < 0.001). Ninety-two percent of all SREs were categorized using 4 of 13 WHO-CFICPS incident types including Clinical Process/Procedure (n = 448, 38.2%), Clinical Administration (n = 248, 21.1%), Documentation (n = 226, 19.2%) and Resources/Organizational Management (n = 15,613.3%). According to PRISMA classification, 14 of the 20 codes were used to describe the same SREs. PRISMA captured 41 Humans Skill Slips from 226 not better defined WHO-CFICPS Documentation Incidents, 38 Human Rule-based behaviour Qualification from not better defined 447 Clinical Process/Procedure and 40 Organization Management priority events from 156 not better defined WHO-CFICPS Resources/Organizational Management events (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although there was a significant association between WHO-CFICPS and PRISMA, The PRISMA method provides a more detailed insight into SREs compared to WHO-CFICPS in a RT department.

Clinical safety of England's national programme for IT: a retrospective analysis of all reported safety events 2005 to 2011.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse patient safety events associated with England's national programme for IT (NPfIT). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all safety events managed by a dedicated IT safety team between September 2005 and November 2011 was undertaken. Events were reviewed against an existing classification for problems associated with IT. The proportion of reported events per problem type, consequences, source of report, resolution within 24h, time of day and day of week were examined. Sub-group analyses were undertaken for events involving patient harm and those that occurred on a large scale. RESULTS: Of the 850 events analysed, 68% (n=574) described potentially hazardous circumstances, 24% (n=205) had an observable impact on care delivery, 4% (n=36) were a near miss, and 3% (n=22) were associated with patient harm, including three deaths (0·35%). Eleven events did not have a noticeable consequence (1%) and two were complaints (<1%). Amongst the events 1606 separate contributing problems were identified. Of these 92% were predominately associated with technical rather than human factors. Problems involving human factors were four times as likely to result in patient harm than technical problems (25% versus 8%; OR 3·98, 95%CI 1·90-8.34). Large-scale events affecting 10 or more individuals or multiple IT systems accounted for 23% (n=191) of the sample and were significantly more likely to result in a near miss (6% versus 4%) or impact the delivery of care (39% versus 20%; p<0·001). CONCLUSION: Events associated with NPfIT reinforce that the use of IT does create hazardous circumstances and can lead to patient harm or death. Large-scale patient safety events have the potential to affect many patients and clinicians, and this suggests that addressing them should be a priority for all major IT implementations.