Tantali fibromyalgic supplicium: Is there any relief with the antidepressant employment? A systematic review.

Widespread musculoskeletal pain characterizes fibromyalgia (FM), accompanied by sleep, fatigue, and mood problems. Chronic stress and depression play a crucial role in the etiology and pathophysiology of FM. They may contribute to a dysregulation of the central pain mechanisms together with the neuroendocrine and immune systems. Pharmacological treatments are the first-line therapy to reduce the symptoms of FM. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) indicated gabapentinoid, pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran for adult patients. An alternative approach is widely used, based on therapies including interventions in patient education, behavioral therapy, exercise, pain management, and a healthy diet. A systematic search was performed on PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. The authors established the selection, inclusion, and exclusion criteria. We found a total of 908 articles. This systematic review will include ten articles selected after excluding duplicates and reading the abstracts and full texts. All studies related the effect of drugs to various symptoms caused by fibromyalgia patients with depression, such as insomnia/sleepiness, depression, suicide, difficulty walking/working, pain, fatigue, and nervousness. Although, we concluded that antidepressant drugs are effective in treating depression and pain in fibromyalgia, further studies are needed to understand the etiology of this disease and to find a combination of therapies to increase tolerability and adherence of the patient to the drug, decreasing the adverse effects.

Use of selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) in the treatment of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), comorbid psychiatric disorders and ASD-associated symptoms: a clinical review.

It is challenging to treat symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), comorbid psychiatric disorders and ASD-associated symptoms. Some of the commonly used medications to treat these can, and frequently do have serious adverse side effects. Therefore, it is important to identify medications that are effective and with fewer side effects and negative outcomes. In this review, we looked at current evidence available for using the serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) class of medications in treating some of these often difficult to treat symptoms and behaviors. An extensive literature search was conducted using EBSCO.host. Our search algorithm identified 130 articles, 6 of which were deemed to meet criteria for the purpose of this review. Each of these six articles was independently reviewed and critically appraised. As a prototype of the SNRIs family, venlafaxine was found to be a useful adjuvant in children and adults with ASD for the treatment of self-injurious behaviors, aggression, and ADHD symptoms when used in doses lower than its antidepressant dosage. However, duloxetine was not found to show any added benefit in treatment of any of the comorbid symptoms and behaviors in ASD when compared to other antidepressants. On the other hand, milnacipran was reported to produce improvements in impulsivity, hyperactivity symptoms, and social functioning through reduction of inattention of ADHD when comorbid with ASD. Overall, SNRIs were shown variable effectiveness in treatment of these comorbid symptoms and behaviors in ASD.

Role of amino acids at positions 34, 296, and 486 of cytochrome P450 2D6 in the stimulatory and inhibitory effects of psychotropic agents on dopamine formation from p-tyramine.

The effects of psychotropic agents such as fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, paroxetine, milnacipran, and fluphenazine on dopamine formation from p-tyramine catalysed by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6.2 (Arg296Cys;Ser486Thr), CYP2D6.10 (Pro34Ser;Ser486Thr), and CYP2D6.39 (Ser486Thr) were compared with the effects on dopamine formation from p-tyramine by CYP2D6.1. Michaelis constants (Km) and maximal velocity (kcat) values for dopamine formation and inhibition constants (Ki) of the psychotropic agents were determined.For CYP2D6.39, the kcat values for fluvoxamine, fluoxetine, and milnacipran, but not for paroxetine and fluphenazine, gradually increased with increasing concentrations, indicating activation of the catalysed reaction.Fluphenazine competitively inhibited dopamine formation catalysed by all variants, with a higher Ki value for CYP2D6.10. Among the three compounds that have a trifluoromethyl group in their chemical structure, only fluvoxamine and fluoxetine, as well as milnacipran that does not have this group, decreased Km values and/or increased kcat values for dopamine formation, suggesting that the group may not be essential for the activation.These findings indicate that substitution of amino acids at positions 34 and 486 can affect the affinity (Km) and enzymatic activity (kcat), respectively, for milnacipran and that the effect of substitution of arginine to cysteine at the 296th position on the activation would be effector dependent.

Use of Hantzsch reaction for quantitation of milnacipran as a magic treatment for fibromyalgia syndrome in human plasma and urine.

A new fluorimetric procedure is described for analysis of milnacipran in its bulk, tablet dosage forms, as well as in biological human samples such as plasma and urine. The suggested method relies on the construction of a derivative with strong fluorescence called dihydropyridine derivative. This derivative resulted from the interaction of the primary amino group in the studied drug and acetylacetone/formaldehyde in McIlvaine buffer (pH 5). The fluorescent dihydropyridine derivative was measured at 470 nm. Influences of experimental variables namely pH, reagent concentration and temperature were examined and optimized. The calibration curve showed linearity over the range of 0.15-1.25 µg ml-1 of milnacipran with an R2 value of 0.9998. The detection limit was 0.02 µg ml-1 and the determination limit was 0.07 µg ml-1 . The developed procedure was successfully used in the assay of the studied drug in Avermilan® tablets with excellent selectivity. In addition, the reaction was applied to estimate the drug in spiked human plasma and urine with mean percentage recoveries of 100.04 ± 1.61 and 99.78 ± 0.81% for urine and plasma, respectively.

Pharmacotherapy in relieving the symptoms of burning mouth syndrome: A 1-year follow-up study.

OBJECTIVE: Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a chronic intraoral burning sensation with no identifiable causes. In this study, we aim to demonstrate the effectiveness of treatment strategy using ethyl loflazepate monotherapy or in combination with milnacipran or amitriptyline. METHOD: A hospital-based, retrospective study was conducted in 86 patients. The patients were divided into remission group and non-remission group. The remission group comprised patients who were satisfied with their pain relief within a year of treatment initiation and did not require any follow-up treatment. The treatment was considered effective if the patient got remission within 1 year or was able to reduce the visual analogue scale (VAS) score to <20, in the absence of remission. RESULTS: The treatment strategy was effective in 76.7% of the patients. Significant reductions (p < .05) in VAS scores from 73.5 ± 14.2 at first visit to 14.7 ± 8.7 at last visit in the remission group, and from 79.7 ± 14.3 at first visit to 33.4 ± 23.7 after 1 year of treatment in the non-remission group were noted. CONCLUSION: The treatment strategy using ethyl loflazepate monotherapy or in combination with milnacipran or amitriptyline can be very effective in reducing pain in BMS patients.

Anti-inflammatory and anti-hyperalgesic effects of milnacipran in inflamed rats: involvement of myeloperoxidase activity, cytokines and oxidative/nitrosative stress.

BACKGROUND: Many injuries cause pain and inflammation, which are one of the major challenges for physicians. In this study, the analgesic and the anti-inflammatory effects of milnacipran were investigated on carrageenan-induced nociception and inflammation in male rats. METHODS: Pain and inflammation were induced by injection of λ-carrageenan (1% v/v) into the hind paw. Indomethacin (10 mg/kg: ip) or milnacipran (10, 20 and 40 mg/kg: ip) were administered 30 min before carrageenan. Analgesia and inflammation were measured by hot plate and plethysmometer. Finally, lipid peroxidation, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), Interleukin 1 beta (IL-1ß), Interleukin 6 (IL-6), myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, nitric oxide (NO) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) status evaluated in the hind paw tissue. RESULTS: The results showed that carrageenan caused hyperalgesia and inflammation in the hind paw tissue. Milnacipran (20 and 40 mg/kg) significantly and dose-dependently attenuated (65 ± 3.2%; p ≤0.01 and 42 ± 6.2%; p ≤ 0.001, respectively) carrageenan-induced inflammation and significantly increased (p ≤ 0.001) nociception threshold. Also, milnacipran (20 and 40 mg/kg) significantly suppressed levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), NO (p ≤ 0.05), MPO activity, TNF-α, IL-1ß and IL-6 (p ≤ 0.001) following carrageenan injection. Additionally, milnacipran (10, 20 and 40 mg/kg) significantly augmented (p ≤ 0.05) TAC status following carrageenan in the hind paw tissue. CONCLUSION: In the present study, milnacipran showed anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects on carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia and inflammation in a dose-dependent manner. Milnacipran reduced inflammatory edema and increased the paw withdrawal threshold probably through suppression of MDA, NO, TNF-α, IL-1ß, IL-6 and MPO activity, and increase of TAC status in the hind paw tissue. Therefore, milnacipran holds important potential as an anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive drug. Although, further clinical trials to confirm this issue, is required.

In Vivo Evaluation of a Novel Chitosan-Polycaprolactone Based Mucoadhesive Gastro-Retentive Sustained Release Drug Delivery System for Milnacipran HCl.

The study was aimed to develop a gastro-retentive mucoadhesive sustained release matrix formulation for milnacipran HCl (MCN) by using the design of experiment (DoE). The gastro-retentive swellable mucoadhesive matrix tablets were prepared by modified solvent-based wet granulation through mixing milnacipran (MCN), chitosan low molecular weight (CH-LM), chitosan medium molecular weight (CH-MM), and polycaprolactone (PCL). Optimization of the formulation was carried out via DoE. Formulations were characterized by DSC, FTIR, and in vitro drug release testing. In vitro mucoadhesive studies were performed on rabbit's intestinal mucosa. In vivo drug release studies were performed on dogs. Optimized matrix formulations showed no significant interaction among the polymers and MCN, confirmed by DSC and FTIR, and were characterized as swellable controlled release matrix systems. The optimized formulations MOPT3 and MOPT4 showed significantly improved adhesion time of 12 h on the gastric mucosa. Based on the in vivo analysis, the elimination half-life of MCN was increased that proved the matrix formulation to be sustained release DDS. The Tmax was extended from 2 to 12 ± 1.63 h for MOPT4. Cmax of matrix was reduced to 121.60 ± 9.496 ng/ml as compared to 149.22 ± 9.942 ng/ml of solution. The bioavailability of the matrix formulation was significantly improved as compared to the MCN solution by 272.20 ± 48.11%. The controlled drug release and strong mucoadhesive properties of the gastro-retentive matrix formulations suggested the potential application of the formulations for the extended oral delivery of MCN.

Managing fibromyalgia syndrome in pregnancy no bridges between USA and EU.

The first aim of this article is to analyze the risk/benefit ratio of using psychotropic drugs approved in some countries for treating fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) during pregnancy. Assessing the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions is the second scope of this article, in order to help clinicians to manage FMS in pregnancy in those countries were no drugs are approved for treating the disease. Following the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, a literature search was conducted on PubMed and Google Scholar. Separate literature searches were performed for the three psychotropic drugs approved in the USA for treating FMS, psychotherapy, and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Perinatal duloxetine exposure is associated with increased risk of gestational and perinatal complications. With regards pregabalin, available information suggests that the drug is not devoid of structural teratogenicity potential. No data are available for milnacipran. Duloxetine and pregabalin should be only given to pregnant women diagnosed with severe forms of FMS after carefully weighing the benefits and risks for the mother-fetus dyad. On the other hand, we have to consider that the proportion of women who discontinue psychotropic drugs during pregnancy is as high as 85.4%. This figure raises further questions about adequate alternative treatment of FMS during the perinatal period. Moreover, neither duloxetine nor milnacipran or pregabalin have been approved by the EMEA for the treatment of FMS. Unfortunately, psychological treatment of FMS in perinatal women are not yet tested and data on TMS are conflicting.

Serotonin and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors.

This chapter covers antidepressants that fall into the class of serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitors. That is, they bind to the 5-HT and NE transporters with varying levels of potency and binding affinity ratios. Unlike the selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), most of these antidepressants have an ascending rather than a flat dose-response curve. The chapter provides a brief review of the chemistry, pharmacology, metabolism, safety and adverse effects, clinical use, and therapeutic indications of each antidepressant. Venlafaxine, a phenylethylamine, is a relatively weak 5-HT and weaker NE uptake inhibitor with a 30-fold difference in binding of the two transporters. Therefore, the drug has a clear dose progression, with low doses predominantly binding to the 5-HT transporter and more binding of the NE transporter as the dose ascends. Venlafaxine is metabolized to the active metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODV; desvenlafaxine) by CYP2D6, and it therefore is subject to significant inter-individual variation in blood levels and response dependent on variations in CYP2D6 metabolism. The half-life of venlafaxine is short at about 5 h, with the ODV metabolite being 12 h. Both parent compound and metabolite have low protein binding and neither inhibit CYP enzymes. Therefore, both venlafaxine and desvenlafaxine are potential options if drug-drug interactions are a concern, although venlafaxine may be subject to drug-drug interactions with CYP2D6 inhibitors. At low doses, the adverse effect profile is similar to an SSRI with nausea, diarrhea, fatigue or somnolence, and sexual side effects, while venlafaxine at higher doses can produce mild increases in blood pressure, diaphoresis, tachycardia, tremors, and anxiety. A disadvantage of venlafaxine relative to the SSRIs is the potential for dose-dependent blood pressure elevation, most likely due to the NE reuptake inhibition caused by higher doses; however, this adverse effect is infrequently observed at doses below 225 mg per day. Venlafaxine also has a number of potential advantages over the SSRIs, including an ascending dose-antidepressant response curve, with possibly greater overall efficacy at higher doses. Venlafaxine is approved for MDD as well as generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, and panic disorder. Desvenlafaxine is the primary metabolite of venlafaxine, and it is also a relatively low-potency 5-HT and NE uptake inhibitor. Like venlafaxine it has a favorable drug-drug interaction profile. It is subject to CYP3A4 metabolism, and it is therefore vulnerable to enzyme inhibition or induction. However, the primary metabolic pathway is direct conjugation. It is approved in the narrow dose range of 50-100 mg per day. Duloxetine is a more potent 5-HT and NE reuptake inhibitor with a more balanced profile of binding at about 10:1 for 5HT and NE transporter binding. It is also a moderate inhibitor of CYP2D6, so that modest dose reductions and careful monitoring will be needed when prescribing duloxetine in combination with drugs that are preferentially metabolized by CYP2D6. The most common side effects identified in clinical trials are nausea, dry mouth, dizziness, constipation, insomnia, asthenia, and hypertension, consistent with its mechanisms of action. Clinical trials to date have demonstrated rates of response and remission in patients with major depression that are comparable to other marketed antidepressants reviewed in this book. In addition to approval for MDD, duloxetine is approved for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain, fibromyalgia, and musculoskeletal pain. Milnacipran is marketed as an antidepressant in some countries, but not in the USA. It is approved in the USA and some other countries as a treatment for fibromyalgia. It has few pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions with other drugs. Milnacipran has a half-life of about 10 h and therefore needs to be administered twice per day. It is metabolized by CYP3A4, but the major pathway for clearance is direct conjugation and renal elimination. As with other drugs in this class, dysuria is a common, troublesome, and dose-dependent adverse effect (occurring in up to 7% of patients). High-dose milnacipran has been reported to cause blood pressure and pulse elevations. Levomilnacipran is the levorotary enantiomer of milnacipran, and it is pharmacologically very similar to the racemic compound, although the side effects may be milder within the approved dosing range. As with other NE uptake inhibitors, it may increase blood pressure and pulse, although it appears to do so less than some other medications. All medications in the class can cause serotonin syndrome when combined with MAOIs.

Withdrawal Symptoms after Serotonin-Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitor Discontinuation: Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) are widely used in medical practice. Their discontinuation has been associated with a wide range of symptoms. The aim of this paper is to identify the occurrence, frequency, and features of withdrawal symptoms after SNRI discontinuation. METHODS: PRISMA guidelines were followed to conduct a systematic review. Electronic databases included PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and MEDLINE from the inception of each database to June 2017. Titles, abstracts, and topics were searched using a combination of the following terms: "duloxetine" OR "venlafaxine" OR "desvenlafaxine" OR "milnacipran" OR "levomilnacipran" OR "SNRI" OR "second generation antidepressant" OR "serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor" AND "discontinuation" OR "withdrawal" OR "rebound." Only published trials in the English language were included. RESULTS: Sixty-one reports met the criteria for inclusion. There were 22 double-blind randomized controlled trials, 6 studies where patients were treated in an open fashion and then randomized to a double-blind controlled phase, 8 open trials, 1 prospective naturalistic study, 1 retrospective study, and 23 case reports. Withdrawal symptoms occurred after discontinuation of any type of SNRI. The prevalence of withdrawal symptoms varied across reports and appeared to be higher with venlafaxine. Symptoms typically ensued within a few days from discontinuation and lasted a few weeks, also with gradual tapering. Late onset and/or a longer persistence of disturbances occurred as well. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians need to add SNRI to the list of drugs potentially inducing withdrawal symptoms upon discontinuation, together with other types of psychotropic drugs. The results of this study challenge the use of SNRI as first-line treatment for mood and anxiety disorders.

Chronopharmacological Analysis of Antidepressant Activity of a Dual-Action Serotonin Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitor (SNRI), Milnacipran, in Rats.

Biological rhythms are thought to be related to the pathogenesis and therapy of various diseases including depression. Here we investigated the influence of circadian rhythms on the antidepressant activity of the dual-action serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) milnacipran. Rats administered milnacipran in the morning (8:00 a.m.; zeitgeber time [ZT]1) or in the evening (8:00 p.m.; ZT13) were analyzed in a forced swim test (FST). At ZT1, the rats' immobility was reduced and the swimming was increased, whereas at ZT13, their climbing was increased. These results suggest that the serotonergic and noradrenergic systems are preferentially affected at ZT1 and ZT13, respectively by milnacipran. We analyzed the plasma and brain levels of milnacipran after administration, and there were no differences between ZT1 and ZT13. The circadian rhythm of monoamine neurotransmitters was analyzed in several brain regions. The serotonin turnover showed rhythms with a peak during ZT18-ZT22 in hippocampus. The noradrenaline turnover showed rhythms with a peak during ZT22-ZT2. There was a difference of approx. 4 h between the serotonergic and noradrenergic systems. This time difference might be one of the factors that affect the action of milnacipran and contribute to the dosing time-dependent behavioral pattern in the FST.

Consensus statements on the clinical understanding and use of milnacipran in Hong Kong.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to develop a local consensus to guide medical practitioners and psychiatrists on the use of milnacipran in different psychiatric conditions. METHODS: By utilizing the modified Delphi technique, 12 statements were electronically voted on anonymously for their practicability of recommendation. RESULTS: There was a very high degree of agreement among the consensus group on 10 finalized consensus statements, but 2 statements were voted down due to a poor degree of agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The present consensus statements were developed as general recommendations for medical practitioners and psychiatrists to be practically referred to in clinical settings.

Milnacipran: serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor approved for fibromyalgia may be a useful antidepressant.

OBJECTIVE: Milnacipran is a serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) approved for treatment of fibromyalgia in Australia, but is used for depression in Europe and elsewhere. This paper will briefly review milnacipran and its utility in psychiatry for the treatment of depression. CONCLUSION: Milnacipran is a dual reuptake inhibitor of noradrenaline and serotonin, with greater effect on noradrenaline than serotonin, in contrast to the related drugs venlafaxine, desvenlafaxine and duloxetine. Rapidly absorbed irrespective of food, milnacipran has a half-life of approximately 8 hours, reaches steady state in 2 days and is excreted renally. Milnacipran helps a minority of patients with fibromyalgia by reducing pain and fatigue. It is also an effective antidepressant with efficacy comparable to venlafaxine and duloxetine, and a side effect profile characteristic of SNRIs. The dose range is 50-200 mg, in divided doses. Milnacipran may be useful for patients with depression and pain, and endogenous depression characterised by anergia, psychomotor retardation and hypersomnia. Caution is necessary in the presence of heart disease, hypertension, renal impairment, epilepsy, glaucoma, bipolar disorder, and bleeding tendency. Milnacipran is likely to be a useful late antidepressant option in treatment-resistant patients, as well as those with chronic pain, anergia and hypersomnia.

Evaluation of cytogenetic and DNA damage induced by the antidepressant drug-active ingredients, trazodone and milnacipran, in vitro.

Trazodone and milnacipran are the active antidepressant drugs that are being used in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. In this study, the in vitro genotoxic effects of trazodone and milnacipran have been determined in human peripheral blood lymphocytes by using chromosomal aberrations (CAs), sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs), micronuclei (MN), and comet assays. 3.13; 6.25; 12.50; 25.00; 50.00; and 75.00 µg/mL concentrations of trazodone and 2.50; 5.00; 10.00; 20.00; 30.00; and 40.00 µg/mL concentrations of milnacipran were used. Trazodone and milnacipran significantly increased the frequency of CAs and SCEs compared with the control. Both of the active ingredients raised the MN frequency in a dose-dependent manner. Mitotic index was significantly decreased, but replication and nuclear division indices were not affected at all treatments. Trazodone was statistically increased the mean comet tail intensity, tail length, and tail moment at three concentrations (6.25; 12.50; and 25.00 µg/mL) compared with control. Two highest concentrations (50 and 75 µg/mL) of trazodone were toxic in the comet assay. Milnacipran increased the comet tail intensity, tail length, and tail moment at all concentrations. It is concluded that trazodone and milnacipran have clastogenic, mutagenic, and cytotoxic effects on human lymphocytes in vitro.

Comparative efficacy and tolerability of duloxetine, pregabalin, and milnacipran for the treatment of fibromyalgia: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The aim of this study was to assess the relative efficacy and tolerability of duloxetine, pregabalin, and milnacipran at the recommended doses in patients with fibromyalgia. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and safety of duloxetine 60 mg, pregabalin 300 mg, pregabalin 150 mg, milnacipran 200 mg, and milnacipran 100 mg compared to placebo in patients with fibromyalgia were included in this Bayesian network meta-analysis. Nine RCTs including 5140 patients met the inclusion criteria. The proportion of patients with >30 % improvement from baseline in pain was significantly higher in the duloxetine 60 mg, pregabalin 300 mg, milnacipran 100 mg, and milnacipran 200 mg groups than in the placebo group [pairwise odds ratio (OR) 2.33, 95 % credible interval (CrI) 1.50-3.67; OR 1.68, 95 % CrI 1.25-2.28; OR 1.62, 95 % CrI 1.16-2.25; and OR 1.61; 95 % CrI 1.15-2.24, respectively]. Ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that duloxetine 60 mg had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving the response level (SUCRA = 0.9431), followed by pregabalin 300 mg (SUCRA = 0.6300), milnacipran 100 mg (SUCRA = 0.5680), milnacipran 200 mg (SUCRA = 0.5617), pregabalin 150 mg (SUCRA = 0.2392), and placebo (SUCRA = 0.0580). The risk of withdrawal due to adverse events was lower in the placebo group than in the pregabalin 300 mg, duloxetine 60 mg, milnacipran 100 mg, and milnacipran 200 mg groups. However, there was no significant difference in the efficacy and tolerability between the medications at the recommended doses. Duloxetine 60 mg, pregabalin 300 mg, milnacipran 100 mg, and milnacipran 200 mg were more efficacious than placebo. However, there was no significant difference in the efficacy and tolerability between the medications at the recommended doses.

Effects of low-dose milnacipran on event-related potentials and neuropsychological tests in persons with traumatic brain injury: A preliminary study.

INTRODUCTION: Psychostimulants are among the most commonly used pharmacological agents for countering cognitive dysfunction and/or enhancing rehabilitation in persons with brain injury. It was postulated that milnacipran, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, would be effective against cognitive dysfunction in non-depressed persons with brain injury. METHODS: Eighteen patients were recruited with at least moderate disability more than 4 months after a traumatic brain injury (TBI) and they were randomized to an 8-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Cognitive dysfunction was assessed at baseline with the Trail Making Test, the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R), the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) and measurement of event-related potentials (ERPs) both before randomization and after an 8-week administration of milnacipran or placebo. RESULTS: N2 and P3 latencies in the milnacipran group were significantly shortened by the intervention. Moreover, the Verbal Intelligence Quotient and Full Intelligence Quotient scores of the WAIS-R and the delayed recall score of the WMS-R were significantly higher than baseline after milnacipran intervention. CONCLUSION: Milnacipran administration improved ERP measures of attention and information processing in non-depressed persons with brain injury and also improved scores on three sub-scales of standard neuropsychological tests of cognitive dysfunction. Therefore, this intervention merits validation by additional, larger studies.

Prediction of in vivo plasma concentration-time profile from in vitro release data of designed formulations of milnacipran using numerical convolution method.

The aim of this study was to predict the in vivo plasma drug level of milnacipran (MIL) from in vitro dissolution data of immediate release (IR 50 mg and IR 100 mg) and matrix based controlled release (CR 100 mg) formulations. Plasma drug concentrations of these formulations were predicted by numerical convolution method. The convolution method uses in vitro dissolution data to derive plasma drug levels using reported pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of a test product. The bioavailability parameters (Cmax and AUC) predicted from convolution method were found to be 106.90 ng/mL, 1138.96 ng/mL h for IR 50 mg and 209.80 ng/mL, 2280.61 ng/mL h for IR 100 mg which are similar to those reported in the literature. The calculated PK parameters were validated with percentage predication error (% PE). The % PE values for Cmax and AUC were found to be 7.04 and -7.35 for IR 50 mg and 11.10 and -8.21 for IR 100 mg formulations. The Cmax, Tmax, and AUC for CR 100 mg were found to be 120 ng/mL, 10 h and 2112.60 ng/mL h, respectively. Predicted plasma profile of designed CR formulation compared with IR formulations which indicated that CR formulation can prolong the plasma concentration of MIL for 24 h. Thus, this convolution method is very useful for designing and selection of formulation before animal and human studies.

Effectiveness of low-dose milnacipran for a patient suffering from pain disorder with delusional disorder (somatic type) in the orofacial region.

Glossodynia is chronic pain localized around the tongue, with no perceivable organic abnormalities. In the fields of oral and maxillofacial surgery, it is categorized as an oral psychosomatic disease. In contrast, psychiatric nosology classifies glossodynia as a pain disorder among somatoform disorders, per the DSM-IV. The patient was a 71-year-old woman who developed symptoms of glossodynia, specifically a sore tongue. In the decade before she presented to us, she had had bizarre symptoms of oral cenesthopathy such as the sensation that her teeth had become 'limp and floppy' and that she needles in her mouth. Treatment was attempted using several psychotropic drugs, but no satisfactory response was noted. Because the patient was referred to our outpatient clinic, we tried psychotropic therapy again. Additionally, valproic acid, tandospirone and sertraline were administered (in this order), but the patient still showed no response. However, when sertraline was changed to milnacipran, all symptoms disappeared in a short period. We suggest that a small dose of milnacipran can be effective for controlling oral cenesthopathy as well as glossodynia.

Milnacipran Has an Antihyperalgesic Effect on Cisplatin-Induced Neuropathy.

(1) Background: Milnacipran is a typical serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor and has been shown to have analgesic effects in several pain models. However, its antihyperalgesic effect in cisplatin-induced neuropathy remains unknown. We examined the effects of intraperitoneal (IP) milnacipran on allodynia in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathic mice. (2) Methods: Peripheral neuropathy was induced by injecting cisplatin (2.3 mg/kg/day, IP) six times, on every other day. Saline or milnacipran (10, 30, 50 mg/kg, IP) were then administered to the neuropathic mice. We examined mechanical allodynia using von Frey hairs at preadministration and at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 min and 24 h after drug administration. We also measured the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) to confirm the analgesic effects of milnacipran. (3) Results: For the milnacipran groups, the decreased paw withdrawal thresholds to mechanical stimuli were significantly reversed when compared to the preadministration values and the values in the saline-injected control group (p < 0.0001). Milnacipran administration to cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathic mice resulted in a significant suppression of neuronal ATF3 activation (p < 0.01). (4) Conclusions: Milnacipran given via IP injection attenuates mechanical allodynia in mouse models of cisplatin-induced poly-neuropathic pain. These effects were confirmed by significant suppression of neuronal ATF3 activation in the DRG.

Systemic and Brain Pharmacokinetics of Milnacipran in Mice: Comparison of Intraperitoneal and Intravenous Administration.

Milnacipran is a dual serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, clinically used for the treatment of major depression or fibromyalgia. Currently, there are no studies reporting the pharmacokinetics (PK) of milnacipran after intraperitoneal (IP) injection, despite this being the primary administration route in numerous experimental studies using the drug. Therefore, the present study was designed to investigate the PK profile of IP-administered milnacipran in mice and compare it to the intravenous (IV) route. First a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated to accurately quantify milnacipran in biological samples. The method was used to quantify milnacipran in blood and brain samples collected at various time-points post-administration. Non-compartmental and PK analyses were employed to determine key PK parameters. The maximum concentration (Cmax) of the drug in plasma was at 5 min after IP administration, whereas in the brain, it was at 60 min for both routes of administration. Curiously, the majority of PK parameters were similar irrespective of the administration route, and the bioavailability was 92.5% after the IP injection. These findings provide insight into milnacipran's absorption, distribution, and elimination characteristics in mice after IP administration for the first time and should be valuable for future pharmacological studies.