Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: reflections after more than 2400 cases performed.

BACKGROUND: The minimally invasive video-assisted approach was developed for primary hyperparathyroidism in 1997 and the year after for thyroid disease. Since then, the technique has been adopted worldwide, and indications moved from the initial benign disease to low-risk and intermediate-risk carcinoma, demonstrating a level of oncologic radicality comparable to the conventional open approach when inclusion criteria are strictly respected. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2014, 2412 minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomies (MIVAT) were performed in our department. The indication for surgery in 825 patients (34.3 %) was a malignant tumor, in particular, a papillary carcinoma in 800 patients. Among them, 528 patients operated on between 2000 and 2009 had a mean complete follow-up of 7.5 (standard deviation, 2.3) years. RESULTS: A total thyroidectomy was performed in 1788 patients (74.1 %) and a hemithyroidectomy in 564 (23.4 %). Also performed was central compartment lymphadenectomy in 31 patients (1.3 %) and parathyroidectomy for the presence of a solitary parathyroid adenoma in 29 (1.2 %). Mean duration of the procedure was 41 (standard deviation, 14) minutes. After a mean follow-up of 7. 5 years, 528 patients who underwent MIVAT for low-risk or intermediate-risk papillary carcinoma presented a cure rate of 85 % (undetectable thyroglobulin), comparable with the 80 % rate reported in patients who had undergone open thyroidectomy during the same period. CONCLUSIONS: After a long experience and a considerable number of procedures performed in a single center, MIVAT is confirmed as a safe operation, with a complication rate comparable with open thyroidectomy. MIVAT offers a cure rate for the treatment of low-risk and intermediate-risk malignancies that is comparable with an open procedure when inclusion criteria are strictly respected.

Six-Year Experience With Endoscopic Thyroidectomy: Outcomes and Safety Profile.

BACKGROUND: Though minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) offers many advantages over traditional thyroid surgery, its adoption in North America has been limited. This study analyzes the largest series of MIVAT in North America to explore its safety. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing thyroid surgery by a single surgeon from 2003 to 2011 at an academic tertiary care medical center was evaluated. Demographic information, surgical and pathologic data, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Beginning in 2005, a total of 260 MIVATs were performed during the study period. Outpatient surgery was accomplished in 234 MIVATs (90%). MIVAT patients were predominantly young (46.8±14.8 years vs 52.4±14.6 years for conventional thyroidectomy) and female (88.5% vs 75.5% for conventional thyroidectomy). There were no cases of permanent hypoparathyroidism or permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve dysfunction. Observed complications included transient recurrent laryngeal nerve dysfunction (n=10; 3.8%), cellulitis (n=1; 0.4%), and temporary hypocalcemia (n=6; 2.3%). The overall complication rate for MIVAT (6.5%) was lower than the overall complication rate in conventional thyroidectomy (18.5%, P<.0001). CONCLUSION: MIVAT can be performed safely with a low complication profile in a high-volume practice. The safety of MIVAT represented by this experience supports broader adoption across surgical practices.

Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Thyroid Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Purpose: Conventional thyroidectomy has been standard of care for surgical thyroid nodules. For cosmetic purposes different minimally invasive and remote-access surgical approaches have been developed. At present, the most used robotic and endoscopic thyroidectomy approaches are minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT), bilateral axillo-breast approach endoscopic thyroidectomy (BABA-ET), bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy (BABA-RT), transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy via vestibular approach (TOETVA), retro-auricular endoscopic thyroidectomy (RA-ET), retro-auricular robotic thyroidectomy (RA-RT), gasless transaxillary endoscopic thyroidectomy (GTET) and robot assisted transaxillary surgery (RATS). The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate whether minimally invasive techniques are not inferior to conventional thyroidectomy. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase and Web of Science to identify original articles investigating operating time, length of hospital stay and complication rates regarding recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and hypocalcemia, of the different minimally invasive techniques. Results: Out of 569 identified manuscripts, 98 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were retrospective in nature. The results of the systematic review varied. Thirty-one articles were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to the standard of care, the meta-analysis showed no significant difference in length of hospital stay, except a longer stay after BABA-ET. No significant difference in incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and hypocalcemia was seen. As expected, operating time was significantly longer for most minimally invasive techniques. Conclusions: This is the first comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the eight most commonly used minimally invasive thyroid surgeries individually with standard of care. It can be concluded that minimally invasive techniques do not lead to more complications or longer hospital stay and are, therefore, not inferior to conventional thyroidectomy.

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT).

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) was first described in 1999 and it has become a widespread technique performed worldwide. Although initially limited to benign thyroid nodules, MIVAT was progressively adopted for all types of thyroid diseases, while remaining within the selection criteria. It is reported that, in selected cases, MIVAT is comparable to standard open thyroidectomy (SOT) in terms of oncologic radicality, time, costs and complications rate, with the advantage of a better cosmetic result and a lower post-operative pain. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective analysis about patients who underwent MIVAT between 1998 and 2019 in the Endocrine Surgery Unit of the University Hospital in Pisa. Indications and contraindications are mentioned and strictly followed. RESULTS: Total thyroidectomy was performed in 1,862 cases (69%) and hemithyroidectomy was performed in 763 cases (28.3%). Conversion occurred in 43 cases (1.6%). In 188 cases (7%) a postoperative transient hypoparathyroidism was reported, whereas definitive hypoparathyroidism was reported in 12 cases (0.4%). Thirty-eight patients (1.4%) suffered from a definitive postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. No definitive bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy occurred. CONCLUSIONS: From our multi-years' experience which spreads over 20 years, we can reaffirm the concept that MIVAT is a safe procedure which is not burdened by an increase complications rate or additional costs. Furthermore, this technique offers advantages in terms of cosmetic results and post-operative pain.

Morbidity from minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: a general review.

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) is known and used worldwide, it combines the advantages associated with endoscopic magnification with those due with traditional surgery. In selected patients, it should be considered a safe and valid alternative. Indeed, a lot of comparative studies have demonstrated the advantages of MIVAT in terms of low rate of complications, reduced postoperative pain, improved cosmetic results and higher patient satisfaction over traditional surgery. Anyway, for obtaining the best results, with similar or even less complication rate than traditional surgery, surgeons should be well trained, acquired confidence with a smaller surgical incision and with the use of endoscopic instruments.

Video-assisted surgery for thyroid cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Today is well known that endoscopic thyroidectomy could reach the same level of completeness as a conventional operation. We have been using minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) as our favorite minimally invasive access to thyroid diseases from the late nineties. METHODS: Our experience with MIVAT is represented by 2,413 cases between 1998 and 2014: in particular 821 patients were operated with a total thyroidectomy for a papillary carcinoma (34.0%). Furthermore 967 patients underwent a MVAT for the presence of an undetermined lesion (40.0%). RESULTS: The conversion rate was very low: 24 patients (1.0%), mainly due to: unexpected posterior tracheal invasions (nine patients), involvement of lymph nodes not evident at echography (four patients), esophageal infiltration (three patients), strap muscles infiltration (three patients) and finally in five cases the presence of serious thyroiditis that had escaped to ultrasonographic evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The minimally MIVAT to treat malignant thyroid tumors has today a very clear indication for malignancies.

Minimally invasive compared with conventional thyroidectomy for nodular goitre.

Since minimally invasive thyroidectomy was introduced in 1997, different surgical approaches to the thyroid have been described: the minimal neck incision and the anterior chest, areolar breast or axillary access. Whereas conventional open thyroidectomy is suitable for any thyroid disease, minimal neck incision thyroidectomy or extracervical scarless neck thyroidectomy are limited to small-volume disease. In 11 prospective randomized studies and six systematic reviews, minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy via a central or lateral neck approach afforded better cosmesis in the first 3 months than conventional open thyroidectomy, with less postoperative pain for the first 48 h. Surgical morbidity did not differ in these limited studies. No head-to-head comparison is available for extracervical scarless neck thyroidectomy and conventional open thyroidectomy. Extracervical scarless neck thyroidectomy caused more postoperative pain and gave rise to complications not seen with minimal neck incision thyroidectomy or conventional open thyroidectomy. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, conventional open thyroidectomy continues to remain the gold standard for any nodular goitre.