Cocaine versus xylometazoline to prevent epistaxis after nasotracheal intubation: A randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Nasotracheal intubation is associated with a risk of epistaxis. Several drugs, including cocaine and xylometazoline may be used as decongestants prior to nasotracheal intubation to prevent this. We hypothesized that xylometazoline would prevent epistaxis more effectively than cocaine, demonstrated by a lower proportion of patients with bleeding after nasotracheal intubation. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, outcome assessor and analyst-blinded, clinical randomized controlled trial following approval from the local research ethics committee and the national medicine agency. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Patients scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia with nasotracheal intubation were randomized to receive either 2 mL 4% cocaine or 2 mL 0.05% xylometazoline prior to nasotracheal intubation. Immediately following intubation, epistaxis was evaluated by the blinded intubating anesthetist on a four-point scale. We measured heart rate and blood pressure the first 5 min after drug administration. Adverse events were followed up after 24 h. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients received cocaine and 49 patients received xylometazoline. Bleeding occurred in 32 patients receiving cocaine (60.4%) and in 34 patients receiving xylometazoline (69.4%) (p = .41, Fisher's exact test) with a difference of 9.0% (95% CI: -9.4% to 27%). There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding the heart rate or blood pressure. No adverse cardiac events were recorded in either group. CONCLUSION: We found no statistically significant difference between cocaine and xylometazoline in preventing epistaxis after nasotracheal intubation, and the choice of vasoconstrictor should be based on other considerations, such as pricing, availability and medicolegal issues.

Detection of cocaine 24 h after administration before nasotracheal intubation.

BACKGROUND: Cocaine may be applied to decongest the nasal mucosa before nasotracheal intubation, but patients risk a criminal offence if cocaine is detected when patients drive a car shortly after surgery. We aimed to evaluate whether benzoylecgonine levels in saliva exceeded the cut-off point 24 h after administration in patients undergoing nasotracheal intubation and whether cocaine would be detectable above the Danish legal fixed limit in blood samples 1 and 24 h after surgery. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study following approval from the local research ethics committee and the national medicine agency. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. We included patients scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia with nasotracheal intubation. They received 80 mg cocaine as a nasal spray 5 min before induction and nasotracheal intubation. The primary outcome was a dichotomous assessment of benzoylecgonine levels in saliva samples measured 24 h after administration of nasal cocaine with a cut-off limit of 200 ng/mL. Secondary outcomes were dichotomous assessments of cocaine in whole blood samples measured 1 and 24 h after administration of nasal cocaine with a cut-off limit of 0.01 mg/kg. RESULTS: Overall, 70 patients had valid saliva samples and 75 had valid blood samples 24 h after cocaine administration. Benzoylecgonine in saliva was traceable above the cut-off in 9/70 patients (13%; CI95%: 6% to 23%), and cocaine in blood was detected above the cut-off in 2/75 patients (3%; CI95%: 0.3% to 9%). CONCLUSION: We found benzoylecgonine traceable in saliva in 13% of patients and cocaine traceable in blood in 3% of patients 24 h after administration of 80 mg nasal cocaine. Patients should be informed when receiving cocaine and advised not to drive for at least 24 h.

A comparative evaluation of fibreoptic bronchoscopy versus C-MAC® D-BLADE-guided videolaryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation under general anesthesia in oropharyngeal carcinoma surgery patients.

PURPOSE: Nasotracheal intubation (NTI) is required for surgery in oropharyngeal (OP) carcinoma patients, but it may be challenging because of distorted anatomy, mucosal congestion, and increased risk of bleeding. Flexible bronchoscopy (FB)-guided NTI is preferred in these cases but has limitations. In this randomized controlled study, we sought to compare C-MAC® D-BLADE-guided videolaryngoscopy (VL) (Karl Storz SE & Co. KG, Tuttlingen, Germany) with FB for NTI under general anesthesia in patients with OP carcinomas. METHODS: We randomized a total of 100 patients with OP carcinoma and El-Ganzouri's risk index (EGRI) < 7 to undergo NTI under general anesthesia with FB (n = 50) or C-MAC D-BLADE-guided VL (n = 50). The primary outcome was the total intubation time. We also recorded the time to glottis view, nasal intubation difficulty scale (NIDS) score, best percentage of glottis opening score, and complications. RESULTS: The median [interquartile range (IQR)] total intubation time was shorter with VL than with FB (total intubation time, 38 [26-43] sec vs 60 [52-65] sec; difference, -20 sec [95% confidence interval (CI), -27 to -11]; P < 0.001). Similarly, the median [IQR] time to glottis view was shorter with VL compared to FB (8 [6-9] sec vs 22 [14-25] sec; difference, -13 sec [95% CI, -17 to -10]; P < 0.001). The median NIDS score was higher with VL (difference, 2 [95% CI, 2 to 3]; P < 0.001). The incidences of airway trauma (two cases with FB vs seven with VL; P = 0.30) and postoperative sore throat (ten cases in both groups; P = 0.56) were similar. CONCLUSION: Compared to FB, C-MAC D-BLADE-based VL reduced the total time for nasal intubation oropharyngeal carcinoma patients, potentially representing an acceptable alternative in selected cases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI.nic.in (2018/11/0162830); first submitted 8 November 2018.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'intubation nasotrachéale est nécessaire pour la chirurgie chez la patientèle atteinte de carcinome oropharyngé, mais elle peut être difficile en raison d'une anatomie déformée, d'une congestion des muqueuses et d'un risque accru de saignement. Dans ces cas, il est préférable d'utiliser une intubation nasotrachéale guidée par bronchoscopie flexible (BF), mais cette modalité a ses limites. Dans cette étude randomisée contrôlée, nous avons cherché à comparer la vidéolaryngoscopie guidée par lame D-BLADE C-MAC® (VL) (Karl Storz SE & Co. KG, Tuttlingen, Allemagne) à la BF pour réaliser l'intubation nasotrachéale sous anesthésie générale chez les patient·es ayant un carcinome oropharyngé. MéTHODE: Au total, nous avons randomisé 100 personnes atteintes d'un carcinome oropharyngé et présentant un indice de risque d'El-Ganzouri (EGRI) < 7 à bénéficier d'une intubation nasotrachéale sous anesthésie générale par BF (n = 50) ou par VL guidée par lame D-BLADE C-MAC (n = 50). Le critère d'évaluation principal était le temps d'intubation total. Nous avons également enregistré le temps écoulé jusqu'à la visualisation de la glotte, le score sur l'échelle de difficulté de l'intubation nasale (NIDS), le meilleur pourcentage de score d'ouverture de la glotte et les complications. RéSULTATS: La durée totale d'intubation médiane [écart interquartile (ÉIQ)] était plus courte avec la VL qu'avec la BF (durée totale d'intubation, 38 [26­43] sec vs 60 [52 à 65] secondes; différence, −20 sec [intervalle de confiance (IC) à 95 %, −27 à −11]; P < 0,001). De même, le temps médian [ÉIQ] jusqu'à la visualisation de la glotte était plus court avec la VL qu'avec la BF (8 [6­9] sec vs 22 [14 à 25] secondes; différence, −13 sec [IC 95 %, −17 à −10]; P < 0,001). Le score médian sur l'échelle NIDS était plus élevé avec la VL (différence, 2 [IC 95 %, 2 à 3]; P < 0,001). L'incidence des traumatismes des voies aériennes (deux cas avec la BF vs sept avec la VL; P = 0,30) et le mal de gorge postopératoire (dix cas dans les deux groupes; P = 0,56) étaient similaires. CONCLUSION: Par rapport à la BF, la VL guidée par lame D-BLADE C-MAC a réduit le temps total d'intubation nasale pour les personnes atteintes d'un carcinome oropharyngé, ce qui représente potentiellement une alternative acceptable dans certains cas. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: CTRI.nic.in (2018/11/0162830); première soumission le 8 novembre 2018.

The difference in rotation angle of the distal endotracheal tube through nasal approach.

BACKGROUND: Nasal intubation using a fiberoptic scope is a useful technique. In clinical practice, we have experienced difficulty in advancing the endotracheal tube (ETT) over the fiberoptic scope because of resistance to the passage of the ETT against rotation in the nasal cavity, when it gets hung up on structures of the laryngeal inlet. Several maneuvers have been proposed to overcome this difficulty. The gap between the tip of the ETT and the fiberoptic scope can be reduced using a thicker fiberoptic scope and a thinner ETT. Moreover, simultaneous rotation of the fiberoptic scope and ETT could lead to successful intubation by reducing impingement on the ETT. However, the discrepancy between these rotation angles is unclear. This observational prospective study aimed to investigate the discrepancy in the rotation angle between the ETT and fiberoptic scope during nasal intubation. METHODS: The patients (aged 20-80 years) who underwent nasal intubation for oral and maxillofacial surgery participated in three sizes of preformed nasal ETT and were intubated using a fiberoptic scope. They were divided into three groups; the ETT internal diameter (ID) 6.5 mm (6.5 group), ID 7.0 mm (7.0 group), and ID 7.5 mm (7.5 group). The ETT was then inserted through the nasal cavity into the pharynx. After the fiberoptic scope was advanced through the ETT above the glottis, simultaneous rotation by both the proximal end of the fiberoptic scope and ETT was performed in 90° and 180° in both right (clockwise) and left (counterclockwise) directions, and the rotation angle at the distal end of the ETT was monitored using a video laryngoscope (Pentax-AWS). RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were included in the study. When both the proximal end of the fiberscope and ETT were simultaneously rotated by 90°, in the 6.5 group (n = 13), the distal end of the ETT rotated by 47.8 ± 1.5°. In the 7.0 °group (n = 13), the distal end of the ETT rotated by 45.5 ± 1.0°. In the 7.5 group (n = 13), the distal end of the ETT rotated by 39.9 ± 1.0°. When the proximal end of the fiberscope and ETT were rotated by 180°, in the 6.5 group, the distal end of the ETT rotated by 166.2 ± 2.5°. In the 7.0 group, the distal end of the ETT rotated by 145.7 ± 2.2°. In the 7.5 group, the distal end of the ETT rotated by 115.1 ± 2.0°. All rotation angles in the distal end of the ETT were significantly lower than those in both the proximal end of the fiberscope and ETT (p < 0.05). Rotating right by 180° was significantly different among the three groups (p < 0.05), although rotating right by 90° was not significantly different. Similar results were obtained for the left rotation. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous rotation by the proximal end of the ETT and fiberscope above the glottis for the nasal approach induced significant differences in the distal end of the ETT. The larger tube lagged by the resistance of the nasal passages during rotation. Therefore, the ETT does not rotate as much as the rotation angle. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This prospective observational study was conducted after receiving approval from the Ethics Review Board of Kyushu University Hospital (Approval No. 30-447).

Acute airway obstruction requiring nasotracheal intubation following hypoglossal neuromonitoring: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is utilized for both the localization of critical structures and for real time detection and prevention of intraoperative neurological injury. Use of IONM to monitor the hypoglossal nerve is performed during neurosurgical, otolaryngological, and vascular procedures to improve surgical outcomes. There is a paucity of literature describing potential complications of IONM of the hypoglossal nerve, especially with respect to airway compromise. Here we present our findings regarding a case of acute airway obstruction following hypoglossal nerve monitoring. CASE PRESENTATION: A 54-year-old male was admitted for left far-lateral craniotomy and microsurgical clipping of a left posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysm. Following induction and intubation but prior to the procedure start, the patient was placed in the ¾ prone position with the left side up and his neck was flexed approximately 10 degrees. He then underwent placement of subdermal needle electrodes into the facial muscles, trapezius muscles, soft palate, and tongue for IONM. The procedure lasted 523 minutes and was completed without complication. However, approximately one hour after emergence from general anesthesia, the patient experienced progressive difficulty breathing secondary to severe lingual swelling. He required emergent placement of a nasotracheal tube guided by a fiberoptic bronchoscope. He remained intubated for 3 days and was treated with dexamethasone, after which the swelling resolved, and the patient was successfully extubated. CONCLUSIONS: Acute lingual edema is a potentially life-threatening phenomenon that can lead to rapid airway compromise. Generally, causes of acute lingual swelling include hemorrhage, edema, infarction, and infection. In the case described above, we suspect traumatic injury to the tongue's vascular supply caused a deep tissue hematoma leading to postoperative acute lingual swelling and airway obstruction. With the widespread use of IONM, it becomes essential for providers to be aware that perioperative airway compromise is a potentially life-threatening complication, especially with respect to monitoring of the hypoglossal nerve. Awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation can successfully be employed to establish an emergency airway in such situations.

Impact of choice of nostril on nasotracheal intubation when using video rigid stylet: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgeries under general anesthesia usually require nasotracheal intubation. When presented with patients with equally patent nostrils, selection of the nostril to use for intubation is an important decision for facilitating intubation. The objective of this trial is to determine whether choice of nostril impacts nasotracheal intubation when using a video rigid stylet in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery. METHODS: Fifty patients scheduled for elective oral and maxillofacial surgery requiring nasotracheal intubation were randomly allocated into two groups to undergo nasotracheal intubation through the left nostril (Group L, n = 25) or the right nostril (Group R, n = 25). Intubation was performed by experienced anesthesiologists using a video rigid stylet. The primary endpoint was time to successful intubation, which was defined as the duration from when the tip of the stylet-tube assembly entered the selected nostril to when the tube entered the trachea. Secondary outcomes included: length of time for device insertion; length of time for tube insertion; total success rate; first-attempt success rate; number of intubation attempts; requirement of airway assisted maneuvers; incidence and severity of epistaxis. Intubation-related adverse events were monitored for up to postoperative 24 h. RESULTS: Median time (interquartile range) to tracheal intubation was 25.3 seconds (20.7 to 27.6) in Group L and 26.8 seconds (22.5 to 30.0) in Group R (median difference (MD) = 1.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.8 to 5.7, P = 0.248). Nasotracheal intubation was successful in all patients in both groups and the first-attempt success rates in both groups were similar (Group L: 96% (24/25); Group R: 96% (24/25); relative risk (RR) 1.0; 95% CI 0.9 to 1.1; P > 0.999). No significant difference of requirement of assisted maneuvers was noted between the two groups (Group L: 36% (9/25); Group R: 28% (7/25); RR 0.8; 95% CI 0.3-1.8; P = 0.544). Furthermore, all patients showed a high quality of visualization of the glottis (Cormack and Lehane Grade I). For safety outcomes, the incidence and severity of epistaxis during intubation was comparable between the two groups. There were no significant differences between the selection of nostrils and intubation-related adverse events up to 24 h after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: When considering which nostril to use for intubation with video rigid stylet, either nostril can be used similarly. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov . Identifier: NCT05218590.

Postoperative Sore Throat Helps Predict Swallowing Disturbance on Postoperative Day 30 of Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Secondary Exploratory Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial of Tracheal Intubation Modes.

Nasotracheal intubation benefits dysphonia recovery after anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS). The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of tracheal intubation modes on post-ACSS swallowing function and identify factors associated with deglutition on postoperative day 30 (POD 30). Adult patients were randomized to receive either nasotracheal or orotracheal intubation during surgery. A numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to assess postoperative sore throat, and the Bazaz grading system was used to assess the severity of swallowing disturbance. The primary endpoints were the effect of tracheal intubation modes on postoperative sore throat and deglutition. Thereafter, we further elucidated the predictors of swallowing disturbance on POD 30. Postoperative sore throat and swallowing disturbance did not differ between the nasotracheal and orotracheal intubation groups. A secondary dataset analysis revealed that among 108 patients with complete follow-up until POD 30, 71 (65.7%) presented complete recovery without swallowing disturbance, whereas 37 (34.3%) presented varying degrees of swallowing disturbance. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that the NRS score for sore throat predicted a swallowing disturbance-free status on POD 30. The optimal cutoff values were ≤ 4 and ≤ 2 on PODs 1 and 2, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for independent predictors was a sore throat NRS score of ≤ 4 on POD 1 (OR 3.2; 95% CI 1.29-7.89; P = 0.012) and score of ≤ 2 on POD 2 (OR 6.67; 95% CI 2.41-18.47; P < 0.001). Therefore, tracheal intubation mode did not affect the incidence of post-ACSS swallowing disturbance, and the severity of sore throat on PODs 1 and 2 could predict a swallowing disturbance-free status on POD 30.The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (Trial No. NCT03240042, date of registration 10/17/2017).

Using of panoramic and posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs to identify the optimal nasal passage for nasotracheal intubation.

Background and Aim: Selecting the optimum nasal passage for nasotracheal intubation is quite important in the maxillofacial surgeries for the success of intubation and the reduction of potential complications such as nasal mucosal laceration, epistaxis, avulsion of the inferior and middle turbinates, and septal laceration. Materials and Methods: The present study evaluates standard panoramic radiographs (PR) and posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs (PACR) to determine the optimal nasal passage for nasotracheal intubation and compares the results with those of routine anesthesiological occlusion and spatula tests (ST). The results of occlusion tests (OT), ST, and radiological assessments of 60 patients prior to nasotracheal intubation were compared with the nasal endoscopic assessment results, and complications were evaluated. Results: There was no significant association between the OT and nasal endoscopy results (P = 0.075). A significant association was found between the ST and nasal endoscopy results (P = 0.000), and between the radiological assessments and the nasal endoscopy results (P = 0.000). Compatibility with nasal endoscopy was 54% when the occlusion and ST were evaluated together, 75% when the OT and radiological assessments were evaluated together, and 86% when the ST and radiological assessments were evaluated together. The highest level of compatibility was 92% when all the tests were evaluated together. Conclusion: The simple tests alone were found to be inadequate for the selection of the optimal nasal passage. Evaluation of PR and PACR, which are commonly used in maxillofacial surgeries, together with simple anesthesiological examination tests would increase nasotracheal intubation success and decrease complications.

Nasotracheal intubation performance with the mcgrath videolaryngoscope versus macintosh laryngoscope in oral and maxillofacial surgery- An observational study.

Background and Aim: Nasotracheal intubation is the main route to secure the airway in oral and maxillofacial surgery patients. This study was aimed to compare the intubation times and glottis visualization of McGrath video laryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope for routine nasotracheal intubation. Materials and Methods: Records of seventy-one ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I-II patients were evaluated and allocated into two groups (McGrath video laryngoscope (VL) and Macintosh groups). Intubation times, modified intubation difficulty scale (MIDS) scores, and hemodynamic parameters (heart rate and mean arterial pressure) were compared after the anesthesia induction and the intubation. Results: Mean intubation time in the McGrath group (24.9 ± 5.9 seconds) was significantly lower than that of the Macintosh group (28 ± 6.2 seconds; P = 0.037). Magill forceps were needed less in the McGrath group compared to the Macintosh group (13.89% vs. 42.86%; P = 0.009). Total MIDS scores were similar (P = 0.778). There was no significant difference in the hemodynamic parameters between the groups. Conclusion: The McGrath VL significantly reduced the intubation time and the use of Magill forceps compared with Macintosh direct laryngoscope and can be utilised effectively for routine nasotracheal intubation.

Comparison of hemostatic effect and safety between epinephrine and tramazoline during nasotracheal intubation: a double-blind randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Nasal bleeding is the most common complication during nasotracheal intubation (NTI). To reduce nasal bleeding, the nasal mucosa is treated with vasoconstrictors (epinephrine [E] or tramazoline [T]) prior to NTI. This study aimed to determine whether E or T is more effective and safe for reducing nasal bleeding during NTI. METHODS: This study was preregistered on UMIN-CTR after being approved by the IRB of the School of Dentistry at Aichi Gakuin University. Written consent was received from all the patients. Total 206 patients aged 20-70 years and classified as 1-2 on American Society of Anesthesiologists-physical status were scheduled to undergo general anesthesia with NTI. At last, 197 patients were randomly divided into two groups and treated with either E (n = 99; 3 patients were discontinued) or T (n = 98; 2 patient were discontinued). After induction of general anesthesia, each patient's nasal mucosa was treated using either E or T. The E used in this study was BOSMIN® SOLUTION 0.1% (Daiichi-Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo), and the T used in this study was TRAMAZOLIN Nasal Solution 0.118% AFP, (Alfresa Pharma Corporation, Osaka). E was diluted five times according to the package insert (final concentration of E = 0.02%), and T was used in its original solution. After 2 min, NTI was performed via the right nostril. Primary outcome were the presence of nasal bleeding (if bleeding was recognized at the posterior pharyngeal wall via nasal cavity during intubation, it was defined as bleeding) and the degree of bleeding (classified as none, mild, moderate, or severe). Secondary outcomes were arrhythmia, and hemodynamic (mean atrial pressure and heart rate) changes associated with vasoconstrictors. RESULTS: The presence of bleeding was comparable in both groups (12.5%, E; 14.5%, T; P = 0.63). No significant difference between the groups regarding the degree of bleeding (P = 0.78) was observed, with most patients having no bleeding (n = 84, E; n = 82, T). No severe bleeding and no arrhythmias induced by vasoconstrictor were observed in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Nasal treatment with E or T shows no difference in nasal bleeding during NTI. Although no arrhythmia associated with E was observed in this study, it has been reported in literature. Therefore, as frequency and degree of nasal bleeding were comparable, nasal treatment with T could reduce the risk of NTI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-CTR (Registration No. UMIN000037907 ). Registered (05/09/2019).

Conversion of an oral to nasal intubation in difficult nasal anatomy patients: two case reports.

BACKGROUND: Nasal intubation is indispensable for some cases that require intraoral surgical access, and the fiberoptic bronchoscope is the best tool for difficult airways. However, fiberoptic bronchoscopy is not always possible in cases with altered pharyngeal anatomy. CASE PRESENTATION: In this report, we introduce a novel technique for retrograde endotracheal oral-to-nasal conversion with an ordinary endotracheal tube exchange catheter. A 49-year-old male with a fractured mandible angle and symphysis was scheduled to undergo mandible reconstruction. Secondly, a 45-year-old male who had a bone defect in the mandible angle and ramus was scheduled for mandible and oral cavity reconstruction. We chose to intubate orally first and successfully converted the endotracheal tube from oral to nasal retrogressively using a tube exchange catheter. CONCLUSIONS: Our simple and safe technique, which use a tube exchange catheter retrogressively, provides an alternative method for a difficult airway in which the fiberscope is not helpful.

Maxillary sinusitis developed as sequelae of accidental middle turbinectomy that occurred during nasotracheal intubation: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Nasotracheal intubation is a very useful technique for orofacial or dental surgery. However, the technique itself can be more traumatic than that of orotracheal intubation. Complications such as turbinectomy or bleeding are often reported. However, little is known about the follow-up of patients after these complications. CASE PRESENTATION: The present case describes an accidental middle turbinectomy that led to endotracheal tube obstruction during nasotracheal intubation, and discusses its long-term follow-up. A 19-year-old man underwent mandibular surgery under general anesthesia and nasotracheal intubation. His right middle turbinate was completely avulsed and became firmly occluded within the tube during nasotracheal intubation. The nasotracheal intubation was performed again and the operation was completed safely. The patient was discharged without sequelae after postoperative care. However, he had symptoms of nasal obstruction and sleep disturbance for 3 months postoperatively. Synechiae were detected between the nasal septum and lateral nasal wall on a right rhinoscopic examination and facial computed tomography at 3 months postoperatively. Additionally, he showed ipsilateral maxillary sinusitis on facial computed tomography at the 2-year follow-up examination. CONCLUSIONS: Nasotracheal intubation can cause late complications as well as early complications. Therefore, if nasotracheal intubation is to be performed, the anesthesiologist should identify the nasal anatomy of the patient accurately and prepare appropriately. In addition, if complications occur, follow-up observation should be performed.

Ephedrine pretreatment for nasotracheal intubation-related epistaxis in maxillofacial surgery with sufficient lubrication: A randomized clinical trial.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Prior to nasotracheal intubation (NTI), topical nasal vasoconstrictors are used to prevent NTI-related epistaxis (NTIRE). Since we learned that there is no significant increase in NTIRE among hypertensive patients undergoing NTI with adequate lubrication but without vasoconstrictors, we initiated this randomized controlled study to assess the necessity of vasoconstrictor use in reducing NTIRE. METHODS: Patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification 1 and normal coagulation function, planned to undergo maxillofacial surgery with NTI were enrolled. Patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to each of the treatment groups: nasal treatment using pure oxybuprocaine gel with adequate lubrication (group G) or 1% ephedrine in addition to oxybuprocaine gel with adequate lubrication (group EG). In addition, the incidence and severity of NTIRE and intubation adjustments were studied. RESULTS: A total of 844 patients, 429 and 415 (groups G and EG, respectively), were included in the analysis. No significant differences were observed in the NTIRE incidence rates in groups G (28%) and EG (27%; p = 0.75, relative risk [RR] = 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.29). No significant differences in the NTIRE incidence rates between the two nostrils were observed in both groups (group G: left, 27.9% vs. right, 28% [p = 0.98, RR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.67-1.51]; group EG: left, 25.8% vs. right, 27.9% [p = 0.63, RR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.72-1.73]. No significant difference was observed in the severity of NTIRE (p = 0.74). In case of difficult advancement of the endotracheal tube, NTIRE incidence was 71% vs. 12% with smooth intubation (p < 0.01, RR = 18.33, 95% CI 12.55-26.77). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Well-lubricated nasotracheal intubation does not require pretreatment with ephedrine to reduce NTIRE.

Prediction of appropriate formula for nasotracheal tube size in developmental disability children.

OBJECTIVES: Developmental disability children have differences in growth. Therefore, tube size selection is important for nasotracheal intubation. In our previous study for healthy children undergoing dental surgery, height was the most suitable factor to predict nasotracheal tube size. The aim of this study was to find the most suitable formula for selection of nasotracheal tube size for them, retrospectively. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Developmental disability children aged 2 to 10 years were included in this study. They were intubated nasotracheally from April 2012 until May 2017. Their actually intubated tube sizes were checked. The predicted tube sizes were calculated according to the formulas by the backgrounds: the diameter of the trachea at the 6th cervical (C6), 7th cervical (C7), and 2nd thoracic vertebrae (T2) in X-ray. The actually intubated tube sizes were compared with predicted sizes. Data were analyzed using Spearman's regression analysis. RESULTS: The tube sizes with 5.0, 5.5, and 6.0 mm ID were intubated in 75 patients. The age-based formula was the most suitable; the correlation coefficients (r2) were 0.9027 (vs age), 0.5434 (vs height), 0.3779 (vs weight), 0.0785 (vs C6), 0.2279 (vs C7), and 0.3065 (Th2) (p < 0.01). However, 0.5-mm smaller size tubes were more frequently intubated actually. Their correspondence rate to the predicted size was 48% (5.0 mm), 52% (5.5 mm), and 39% (6.0 mm), respectively. CONCLUSION: The age-based formula could be the most suitable for predicting nasotracheal tube size in developmental disability children aged 2 to 10 years. One smaller size by the age formula was most suitable at first trial tube. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present data indicate that the selection of nasotracheal tube using one smaller size by the age formula (ID = 4 + age [years]/4) might be useful for developmental disability children.

Retropharyngeal internal carotid artery: a potential risk factor during nasotracheal intubation.

PURPOSE: To investigate the potential risk of the retropharyngeal internal carotid artery (RICA) during nasotracheal intubation (NTI). METHODS: We retrospectively surveyed 2028 patients and 90 healthy controls (HC) with neck computed tomography angiography (CTA). The incidence of RICA was analyzed, as well as the correlation between the average minimum carotid-pharyngeal distance (CPD) and the carotid-median plane distance (CMD). We also compared CPD between RICA and HC. RESULTS: RICA was observed in 91 out of the 2028 patients, reaching an incidence of 4.5% (91/2028). RICA in female patients was 65.9% (60/91) compared to 34.1% (31/91) in male patients. The incidence of RICA at nasopharynx (NP), oropharynx (OP), and hypopharynx (HP) was 31.9% (29/91), 61.5% (56/91), and 6.6% (6/91), respectively. The incidence of the mucosal eminence of the posterior wall of the pharynx in RICA was 30.8% (28/91). In 15 cases, RICA caused the pharyngeal cavity to become narrow, with an incidence of 16.5% (15/91). Moreover, CPD and CMD was positively correlated (r = 0.56, p < 0.01). The average minimum CPD of RICA was only 2.25 ± 1.26 mm, which was much shorter than HC (17.62 ± 1.98 mm) (t = 62.46, p < 0.01). Some CPD of RICA was even less than 1 mm, with an incidence of 20.9% (19/91). CONCLUSION: RICA is not uncommon in asymptomatic adults. It is very close to the midline and posterior wall of the pharynx and is more likely to occur in the nasopharynx (NP) and oropharynx (OP). RICA tear is likely to occur during NTI.

Comparative evaluation of glidescope videolaryngosocope and conventional macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing oropharyngeal cancer surgeries: A prospective randomized study.

Background and Aims: Nasotracheal intubation in oropharyngeal cancer patients is challenging owing to anatomical alterations. Various videolaryngoscopes have been compared to conventional laryngoscope and also amongst each other in different clinical scenarios; the supremacy of videolaryngoscopes over conventional laryngoscope in oropharyngeal cancer patients is yet to be established. We compared the efficacy of glidescope videolaryngoscopes and Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients posted for routine oropharyngeal cancer. Material and Methods: 120 ASA I and II oropharyngeal cancer patients scheduled for elective surgery were randomized to undergo nasotracheal intubation after induction of general anesthesia with glide scope video laryngoscope (Group GVL, N = 60) or Macintosh laryngoscope (Group L, N = 60) as per group allocation. Time to glottic view, total intubation time (primary objective), hemodynamic fluctuations, and additional manoeuvres to aid intubation were recorded. Results: Time to visualize the glottic opening (9.20 ± 4.6 sec vs 14.8 ± 6.3 sec) (P = 0.000) and the total intubation time was significantly less in group GVL (35.6 ± 9.57 sec vs 42.2 ± 11 sec) (P = 0.001). Glidescope videolaryngosocpe provided better glottic views and resulted in significantly fewer manoeuvres to facilitate NTI (P = 0.009). The median numeric rating scale (NRS), hemodynamic parameters and complications were similar in both the groups. Conclusion: Glidescope videolaryngosocpe is better than conventional Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation times and need of manoeuvres to facilitate intubation and should be a preferred device for NTI in patients with oropharyngeal cancer.

Does really selection of nostril affect performance of nasotracheal intubation with nasotracheal Airtraq®?

No abstract.

New Device for Securing Nasotracheal Intubation Tube During Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Since 2018, we have been using a 3D printer to fabricate a proprietary device for fixing nasotracheal tubes. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the impact of this nasotracheal intubation (NTI) fixation device. It has been used in 335 patients undergoing general anesthesia for oral and maxillofacial surgeries. No necrosis or permanent tissue damage was observed, and none of the patients developed complications requiring treatment. No unintentional tube-related incidents such as extubation, dislocation of the tube, or disconnection between the tube and the artificial respiration circuit occurred either. This fixation device offers three advantages: safety, no impediment to surgery, and minimal invasiveness. Of these, safety is the most important. The high degree of immobilization it offers makes it possible to prevent injury to the nasal ala when the tracheal tube is tugged to the cranial side. There is also a high degree of immobilization at the connection site between the tracheal tube and anesthesia circuit, making it possible to prevent disconnection due to intraoperative pressure. In addition, safety during fixation is less likely to differ depending on the degree of proficiency of the individual anesthesiologist. The presence of a groove through which the sampling tube of the capnometer can be passed makes it possible to prevent the problem of flexion of the sampling tube, rendering detection impossible during surgery. Thus, use of this fixation device offers the potential to improve immobilization of the tracheal tube and increase intraoperative safety. However, there remain several problems that need to be addressed with this novel device. Further improvements aimed at enhancing safety are planned, therefore.

A randomized controlled trial comparing McGRATH series 5 videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of McGRATH series 5 videolaryngoscope (VL) with Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation (NTI) in patients without anticipated difficult airways undergoing head and neck cancer surgeries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We randomized 60 adult patients for NTI by experienced anesthetists with either Macintosh laryngoscope or McGRATH series 5 VL (VL group). The primary objective was to compare time taken for intubation (TTI). The secondary objectives included success rates, number of attempts, need for optimization maneuvers, Cormack and Lehane (CL) grade, and percentage of difficult intubations. RESULTS: The mean TTI in the VL group was 43 (±10.6) versus 75 (±38.0) s in the Macintosh group (99% CI: 12.5; -51.6 s; P < 0.001). The overall intubation success rate was 100% in both groups. All 29 (100%) patients in the VL group were intubated in the first attempt versus 26 (86%) patients in the Macintosh group (99% CI -5; 33%; P = 0.11). In the Macintosh group, 20 (66%) patients needed optimization maneuver versus none in the VL group (99% CI 40; 91%; P < 0.001). In the VL group, 28 (96%) patients had a CL grade 1 view versus 9 (31%) in Macintosh group (99% CI 38; 92%; P < 0.001). There were no difficult intubations in the VL group versus 3 (10%) in the Macintosh group (99% CI: 7; 28%; P = 0.237). There was no trauma to oropharyngeal structures in either group. CONCLUSION: The McGRATH series 5 VL has faster TTI, better glottic visualization, and less need for optimization maneuvers than the Macintosh laryngoscope for NTI in patients with unanticipated difficult airways, when performed by experienced anesthetists.

Effect of neck extension on the advancement of tracheal tubes from the nasal cavity to the oropharynx in nasotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians sometimes encounter resistance in advancing a tracheal tube, which is inserted via a nostril, from the nasal cavity into the oropharynx during nasotracheal intubation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of neck extension on the advancement of tracheal tubes from the nasal cavity into the oropharynx during nasotracheal intubation. METHODS: Patients were randomized to the 'neck extension group (E group)' or 'neutral position group (N group)' for this randomized controlled trial. After induction of anesthesia, a nasal RAE tube was inserted via a nostril. For the E group, an anesthesiologist advanced the tube from the nasal cavity into the oropharynx with the patient's neck extended. For the N group, an anesthesiologist advanced the tube without neck extension. If the tube was successfully advanced into the oropharynx within two attempts by the same maneuver according to the assigned group, the case was defined as 'success.' We compared the success rate of tube advancement between the two groups. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients in the E group and 33 in the N group completed the trial. The success rate of tube passage during the first two attempts was significantly higher in the E group than in the N group (93.8% vs. 60.6%; odds ratio = 9.75, 95% CI = [1.98, 47.94], p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Neck extension during tube advancement from the nasal cavity to the oropharynx before laryngoscopy could be helpful in nasotracheal intubation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03377114 , registered on 13 December 2017.