Moving beyond bruxism episode index: Discarding misuse of the number of sleep bruxism episodes as masticatory muscle pain biomarker.

The objective of the current study was to evaluate the clinical utility of bruxism episode index in predicting the level of masticatory muscle pain intensity. The study involved adults (n = 220) recruited from the Outpatient Clinic of Temporomandibular Disorders at the Department of Experimental Dentistry, Wroclaw Medical University, during the period 2017-2022. Participants underwent medical interview and dental examination, focusing on signs and symptoms of sleep bruxism. The intensity of masticatory muscle pain was gauged using the Numeric Rating Scale. Patients identified with probable sleep bruxism underwent further evaluation through video-polysomnography. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro-Wilk test, Spearman's rank correlation test, association rules, receiver operating characteristic curves, linear regression, multivariate regression and prediction accuracy analyses. The analysis of correlation and one-factor linear regression revealed no statistically significant relationships between bruxism episode index and Numeric Rating Scale (p > 0.05 for all analyses). Examination of receiver operating characteristic curves and prediction accuracy indicated a lack of predictive utility for bruxism episode index in relation to masticatory muscle pain intensity. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated no discernible relationship between bruxism episode index and Numeric Rating Scale across all examined masticatory muscles. In conclusion, bruxism episode index and masticatory muscle pain intensity exhibit no correlation, and bruxism episode index lacks predictive value for masticatory muscle pain. Clinicians are advised to refrain from employing the frequency of masticatory muscle activity as a method for assessing the association between masticatory muscle pain and sleep bruxism.

A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial comparing nebulized ketamine to intravenous morphine for older adults in the emergency department with acute musculoskeletal pain.

OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to investigate the analgesic efficacy of nebulized ketamine in managing acute moderate-to-severe musculoskeletal pain in older emergency department (ED) patients compared with intravenous (IV) morphine. METHODS: This was a non-inferiority, double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted at a single medical centre. The patients aged 65 and older, who presented at the ED musculoskeletal pain within 7 days and had a pain score of 5 or more on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS), were included in the study. The outcomes were a comparison of the NRS reduction between nebulized ketamine and IV morphine 30 minutes after treatment, incidence of adverse events and rate of rescue therapy. RESULTS: The final study included 92 individuals, divided equally into two groups. At 30 minutes, the difference in mean NRS between the nebulized ketamine and IV morphine groups was insignificant (5.2 versus 5.7). The comparative mean difference in the NRS change from baseline between nebulized ketamine and IV morphine [-1.96 (95% confidence interval-CI: -2.45 to -1.46) and -2.15 (95% CI: -2.64 to -1.66) = 0.2 (95% CI: -0.49 to 0.89)] did not exceed the non-inferiority margin of 1.3. The rate of rescue therapy did not differ between the groups. The morphine group had considerably higher incidence of nausea than the control group (zero patients in the ketamine group versus eight patients (17.4%) in the morphine group; P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Nebulized ketamine has non-inferior analgesic efficacy compared with IV morphine for acute musculoskeletal pain in older persons, with fewer adverse effects.

Intrathecal morphine delivery at prepontine cistern to control refractory cancer-related pain: a case report of extensive metastatic and refractory cancer pain.

BACKGROUND: Extensive metastatic and refractory cancer pain is common, and exhibits a dissatisfactory response to the conventional intrathecal infusion of opioid analgesics. CASE PRESENTATION: The present study reports a case of an extensive metastatic esophageal cancer patient with severe intractable pain, who underwent translumbar subarachnoid puncture with intrathecal catheterization to the prepontine cistern. After continuous infusion of low-dose morphine, the pain was well-controlled with a decrease in the numeric rating scale (NRS) of pain score from 9 to 0, and the few adverse reactions to the treatment disappeared at a low dose of morphine. CONCLUSIONS: The patient achieved a good quality of life during the one-month follow-up period.

Post-operative shift in pain profile following fusion surgery for adult spinal deformity: a cluster analysis.

PURPOSE: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is associated with a combination of back and leg pain of various intensities. The objective of the present study was to investigate the diverse reaction of pain profiles following ASD surgery as well as post-operative patient satisfaction. METHODS: Multicenter surveillance collected data for patients ≥ 19 years old who underwent primary thoracolumbar fusion surgery at > 5 spinal levels for ASD. Two-step cluster analysis was performed utilizing pre-operative numeric rating scale (NRS) for back and leg pain. Radiologic parameters and patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores were also obtained. One-year post-operative outcomes and satisfaction rates were compared among clusters, and influencing factors were analyzed. RESULTS: Based on cluster analysis, 191 ASD patients were categorized into three groups: ClusterNP, mild pain only (n = 55); ClusterBP, back pain only (n = 68); and ClusterBLP, significant back and leg pain (n = 68). ClusterBLP (mean NRSback 7.6, mean NRSleg 6.9) was the oldest 73.4 years (p < 0.001) and underwent interbody fusion (88%, p < 0.001) and sacral/pelvic fixation (69%, p = 0.001) more commonly than the other groups, for the worst pelvis incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (mean 43.7°, p = 0.03) and the greatest sagittal vertical axis (mean 123 mm, p = 0.002). While NRSback, NRSleg and PRO scores were all improved postoperatively in ClustersBP and BLP, ClusterBLP showed the lowest satisfaction rate (80% vs. 80% vs. 63%, p = 0.11), which correlated with post-operative NRSback (rho = -0.357). CONCLUSIONS: Cluster analysis revealed three clusters of ASD patients, and the cluster with the worst pain back and leg pain had the most advanced disease and showed the lowest satisfaction rate, affected by postoperative back pain.

Comparison of side effects of different steroids used in intratympanic injections.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the side effects of different steroids used in the intratympanic injections (IT). METHODS: One hundred and sixty patients diagnosed with sudden sensorineural hearing loss and undergoing IT were assigned to four groups based on the type or concentration of steroids administered (Group DM5: 5 mg/ml Dexamethasone sodium phosphate; Group DM10: 10 mg/ml Dexamethasone sodium phosphate; Group MP: 40 mg/ml Methylprednisolone sodium succinate; Group BM: 4 mg/ml Betamethasone sodium phosphate). Each group comprised 40 patients, and all participants received IT six times. The study assessed and compared the degrees and duration of pain, dizziness, and tympanic membrane damage following IT. Patients were asked to report the pain they felt using the numeric rating scale (NRS). RESULTS: NRS scores for pain after IT showed significant differences among the four groups (p < 0.001). The average NRS scores for pain in each group were as follows: Group DM5: 1.53 ± 1.04; Group DM10: 1.45 ± 1.30; Group MP: 4.33 ± 2.22; Group BM: 6.03 ± 1.46. The durations of pain after IT also exhibited significant differences among the four groups (p < 0.001), with the longest duration observed in Group MP at 31.93 ± 15.20 min. CONCLUSION: Different types of steroids could lead to varying degrees of pain when used in IT. Betamethasone could cause the most severe pain, and methylprednisolone could result in the longest duration of pain.

Establishing the Patient-Acceptable Symptom State for the Numeric Rating Scale-Pain Score in a Postoperative Non-Shoulder Hand and Upper-Extremity Population.

PURPOSE: The patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) is a threshold score on a patient-reported outcome measurement beyond which patients consider themselves "well." Our purpose was to establish the PASS for the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain in a 1-year postoperative hand surgery population. METHODS: This retrospective study included adult patients undergoing non-shoulder upper-extremity surgery at a single, tertiary medical center identified over a 9-month period. At 1 year after surgery, NRS pain and responses to a pain-specific anchor question were collected. Patients were dichotomized based on achieving "PASS(+)" or failing to achieve "PASS(-)" an acceptable symptom state based upon their response to a pain-specific anchor question. Threshold values of a PASS(+) state were calculated for the NRS pain score using the following three methods: (1) mean score of PASS(+) patients, (2) Tubach method (75th percentile threshold for PASS(+) patients), and (3) the Youden index (receiver operating curve analysis to maximize sensitivity and specificity). RESULTS: Of 233 included patients, mean age was 54 years (±17), and 58% (n = 136) were women. Mean NRS pain scores differed between PASS(+) and PASS(-) patients (0.7 ± 1.2 vs 3.8 ± 2.7, respectively). PASS(-) patients were more likely to be non-White and have a diagnosed psychiatric comorbidity. Patient-acceptable symptom state estimates ranged from 0.73 to 2.1 for NRS pain, depending on the calculation method (0.73 for the mean score method, 1.0 for the Tubach method, and 2.1 for the Youden index). The area under the curve for the Youden index method was 0.86 consistent with excellent discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: We propose the value of 2.1 to represent the PASS threshold for the NRS pain score in this population. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This PASS value should be used when interpreting NRS pain score outcomes at a population level. This threshold is expected to yield excellent discrimination for patient satisfaction when applied to a postoperative hand surgery population.

Surgical and/ or conservative treatment improves quality of life (EHP-30) in patients with endometriosis.

AIM: To investigate the quality of life of women with endometriosis before treatment and 3 months after the start of surgical and/or conservative treatment. SAMPLE AND METHODOLOGY: The sample comprised of 38 patients, of whom 26 underwent surgical treatment, 6 had pharmacological treatment, and 6 had both surgical and pharmacological treatment. The Endometriosis Health Profile (EHP-30) questionnaire in the Czech version and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) were used to assess quality of life. The questionnaires were completed before treatment and 3 months into the treatment. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: When comparing quality of life with the EHP-30 questionnaire, 3 months after the start of treatment, significantly better quality of life scores were found in all domains except the domain "Infertility." Statistically significant improvement was observed in the domains of "Control and powerlessness," "Emotional well-being," and "Pain" (P < 0.0001). Pain assessment using NRS showed subjective improvement in pain during menstruation, outside menstruation, during intercourse, micturition, and defecation. Statistically significant improvement was reported in pain during menstruation and outside menstruation (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Treatment of endometriosis improves the quality of life and also leads to a subjective reduction of pain intensity as one of the main symptoms of the disease.

Retrospective Evaluation of the Effect of Lumbar Sympathetic Blockade on Pain Scores, Fontaine Classification, and Collateral Perfusion Status in Patients with Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effect of lumbar sympathetic block (LSB) on pain scores, Fontaine Classification, and collateral perfusion status in patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD), in whom revascularization is impossible. Material and Methods: Medical records of 21 patients with PAD who underwent LSB with a combination of local anesthetics, steroids, and patient follow-up forms containing six-month follow-ups between January 2020 and March 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Pain Detect Questionnaire (PDQ) scores, Fontaine Classification Stages, and collateral perfusion status (collateral diameter and/or development of neovascularization) evaluated by arterial color Doppler Ultrasound (US) from the medical records and follow-up forms of the patients were reviewed. Results: NRS and PDQ scores were significantly lower, and regression of the Fontaine Classification Stages was significantly better after the procedure at the first, third, and sixth month than at the baseline values (p < 0.001). Only four patients (19%) had collaterals before the procedure. An increase in the collateral diameter after LSB was noted in three out of four patients. Before the procedure, 17 patients had no prominent collateral. However, in thirteen of these patients, after LSB, neovascularization was detected during the six-month follow-up period (three patients in the first month, seven patients in the third month, and thirteen patients in the sixth month). The number of patients evolving neovascularization after LSB was found to be statistically significant at the third and sixth months compared to the initial examination (p < 0.001). Conclusions: LSB with the use of local anesthetic and steroids in patients with lower extremity PAD not only led to lower NRS and PDQ scores, but also resulted in regressed Fontaine Classification Stages and better collateral perfusion status.

Validation of the bowel urgency numeric rating scale in patients with Crohn's disease: results from a mixed methods study.

PURPOSE: Bowel urgency (BU) is an important symptom of Crohn's disease (CD), however there is no patient-reported outcome (PRO) scale validated in this population to assess BU severity. Here we evaluated the content validity and psychometric properties of the Urgency Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). METHOD: Qualitative interviews were conducted with moderate-to-severe CD participants to confirm importance and relevance of BU in this population, cognitively debrief the Urgency NRS, and explore score interpretation and CD remission. A quantitative web survey study was conducted to explore the measurement properties of the urgency NRS. RESULTS: Qualitative Interview: 34 of 35 participants reported BU. It was most bothersome for 44%, 47% reported it daily, 18% with every bowel movement. BU had a severe impact on daily activities, causing many participants to stay home more than preferred. Patients confirmed the relevance, appropriateness, comprehensibility of the item, recall period, response options, and instructions of the Urgency NRS. Small reductions on the Urgency NRS score reflected meaningful improvements. Quantitative survey: The study sample comprised 76 participants (65.8% female). Mean Urgency NRS score was 4.7 (SD 2.26; N = 76) at Week 1, with no floor/ceiling effect. Test-retest reliability was acceptable. Construct and known-groups validity against selected PROs were overall strong and within ranges hypothesized a priori. CONCLUSION: The Urgency NRS is a valid and reliable instrument to assess BU severity in CD.

Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Breast Reduction Surgery: A Prospective Randomized and Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is an interfascial plane block used for analgesia of the chest and abdominal wall. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative analgesic efficacy of bilateral single-shot ESPB at T5 vertebral level in breast reduction surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty adult female patients scheduled for breast reduction surgery were included and randomly allocated to two groups to receive either preoperative ESPB with a local anesthetic mixture of 10 mL 0.5% bupivacaine, 5 mL 2% lidocaine, and 5 mL saline, or sham block. Patients in both groups received intraoperative remifentanil infusion and, postoperatively, morphine via the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. The primary outcome was 24-h total morphine consumption, and secondary outcomes included intraoperative opioid consumption, postoperative pain intensity, time to first PCA request, supplement analgesic requirements, functional recovery, patient satisfaction, length of hospital stay, and side effects and complications. RESULTS: The 24-h total morphine consumption was significantly lower in the ESPB group vs. the sham group (mean ± SD, 6.7 ± 3.9, and 13.9 ± 5.7 mg, respectively, p < 0.001). Compared with sham block, ESPB reduced pain scores, intraoperative opioid consumption, supplement analgesic requirements, delayed time to first PCA request, and improved functional recovery and patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: In breast reduction surgery, preoperative single-shot ESPB reduces perioperative opioid consumption and provides adequate pain relief within 24 h postoperatively compared to systemic analgesics alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03621345 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .