Surgical Approach Does Not Affect Chronic Opioid Usage After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Three different surgical approaches (the direct anterior, antero-lateral, and posterior) are commonly used for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Due to an internervous and intermuscular approach, the direct anterior approach may result in less postoperative pain and opioid use, although all 3 approaches have similar outcomes 5 years after surgery. Perioperative opioid medication consumption poses a dose-dependent risk of long-term opioid use. We hypothesized that the direct anterior approach is associated with less opioid usage over 180 days after surgery than the antero-lateral or posterior approaches. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed including 508 patients (192 direct anterior, 207 antero-lateral, and 109 posterior approaches). Patient demographics and surgical characteristics were identified from the medical records. The state prescription database was used to determine opioid use 90 days before and 1 year after THA. Regression analyses controlling for sex, race, age, and body mass index were used to determine the effect of surgical approach on opioid use over 180 days after surgery. RESULTS: No difference was seen in the proportion of long-term opioid users based on approach (P = .78). There was no significant difference in the distribution of opioid prescriptions filled between surgical approach groups in the year after surgery (P = .35). Not taking opioids 90 days prior to surgery, regardless of approach, was associated with a 78% decrease in the odds of becoming a chronic opioid user (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Opioid use prior to surgery, rather than THA surgical approach, was associated with chronic opioid consumption following THA.

Persistent opioid use in patients with multiple myeloma post-ASCT.

PURPOSE: Bone pain is a common presenting symptom of multiple myeloma (MM) and is frequently treated with opioids in addition to myeloma directed therapy. With improved response and survival with modern myeloma therapy, it is important to re-examine the role of opioids in managing symptomatic myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with myeloma at Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey (RCINJ) who received an ASCT between January 1, 2012, and December 30, 2017, and who had subsequent follow-up (a total of 138 patients). We sought information specifically from the visits after induction therapy but prior to ASCT, at 100 days and 1-year post-ASCT follow-up visits. We compared opioid users and non-users in relation to treatment response, co-morbid conditions, and symptoms. We also examined amounts, duration, and odds of continued opioid use. RESULTS: At the time of the first analysis (before transplant), 34.8% of patients were using opioids and opioid use was more frequent in younger patients and, as expected, in patients with bone lesions. At 1 year, 31.9% of patients were still using opioids and continued opioid use was not correlated with disease response. Of the patients using opioids at the time of transplant, 58% either maintained their opioid dose or increased it at 1-year post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis shows that despite a small decrease in opioid use over time, opioid use remains frequent in MM patients and is correlated with younger age and bone involvement but not with response to therapy. Over half the patients using opioids at the time of transplant continued or increased opioid use over the following year. With increasing survival in myeloma patients, further attention is required to distinguish cancer pain from chronic pain in cancer patients.

The continuous infusion fascia iliaca compartment block: a safe and effective analgesic modality in geriatric hip fracture patients.

OBJECTIVE: Hip fractures are common orthopaedic injuries in the elderly. Opioids can provide peri-operative pain relief in hip fracture patients, but may have side effects. Peripheral nerve blocks such as the fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) have become an established part of the multimodal analgesic regime administered peri-operatively to hip fracture patients. We compare the efficacy of the continuous infusion FICB (CFICB) on peri-operative pain relief, opioid usage, its associated complications and the short as well as long term rehabilitation status in geriatric hip fractures patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective matched case control study, 40 geriatric patients with hip fractures who had received the CFICB from Nov 2014 to April 2016 were matched in a 1:3 ratio with similar patients whom had not received the CFICB from our institution's hip fracture database of 913 patients. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients in both the CFICB group (N = 40) and the control group (N = 117) were studied. The post-operative pain scores and the total opioid consumption during the first 3 days in the CFICB group were significantly less than the control group (p < 0.0001, respectively). The systemic complications in the CFICB group were comparable with the control group. The CFICB group had slower rehabilitation at up to 2 weeks but there was no significant difference at 1 year post surgery in terms of function and mobility between the two groups. In both groups, better pre-fracture function was associated with faster short term rehab outcomes in post-operative patients. CONCLUSION: The CFICB provides safe and effective post-operative pain relief in geriatric hip fracture patients. Post-operative opioid usage is decreased in older hip fracture patients treated with CFICB. Rehabilitation milestones are slower in the short term, but have no significant difference at 1-year post surgery.

Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: evaluation of complications, survival, and opioid prescribing patterns.

We aim to compare complications, readmission, survival, and prescribing patterns of opioids for post-operative pain management for Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy (RARC) as compared to open radical cystectomy (ORC). Patients that underwent RARC or ORC for bladder cancer at a tertiary care center from 2005 to 2021 were included. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. Comparisons of narcotic usage were completed with oral morphine equivalents (OMEQ). Multivariable linear regression was used to assess predictors of OMEQ utilization. A total of 128 RARC and 461 ORC patients were included. There was no difference in rates of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications between RARC and ORC (36.7 vs 30.1%, p = 0.16). After a mean follow up of 3.4 years, RFS (HR 0.96, 95%CI 0.58-1.56) and OS (HR 0.69, 95%CI 0.46-1.05) were comparable between RARC and ORC. There was no difference in the narcotic usage between patients in the RARC and ORC groups during the last 24 h of hospitalization (median OMEQ: 0 vs 0, p = 0.33) and upon discharge (median OMEQ: 178 vs 210, p = 0.36). Predictors of higher OMEQ discharge prescriptions included younger age [(- )3.46, 95%CI (-)5.5-(-)0.34], no epidural during hospitalization [- 95.85, 95%CI (- )144.95-(- )107.36], and early time-period of surgery [(- )151.04, 95%CI (- )194.72-(- )107.36]. RARC has comparable 90-day complication rates and early survival outcomes to ORC and remains a viable option for bladder cancer. RARC results in comparable levels of opioid utilization for pain management as ORC.

Interspecialty Opioid Prescribing Patterns in Ophthalmology Following Declaration of a Public Health Emergency.

Purpose: Previous literature has investigated opioid prescription trends in ophthalmology at large, however, little has been done looking at differences between subspecialties. We evaluate if significant trends exist among subspecialties in opioid prescribing patterns. This study aims to illuminate potential over-usage of opioids in ophthalmology that could compromise patient quality of life. Methods: Medicare data and "National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES) Downloadable File" were queried for cases of ophthalmologists with nonsuppressed opioid prescription data from 2014 to 2019. Ophthalmologists with no subspecialty code or missing regional, gender, degree, or graduation information were excluded. Chi-squared analysis, analysis of variance, t-tests, and multivariate logistic regression were utilized. Results: Five thousand one hundred forty-three physician records were included in analysis, 450 of which were by cornea subspecialists. Most cornea cases were male, graduated before 2005, and practiced in the South. All subspecialties had a significantly increased likelihood of making opioid claims and higher prescription rates compared with cornea (P < 0.050) besides glaucoma (P = 0.357). Only oculoplastics had significantly increased likelihood of greater total supply of opioids compared with cornea (odds ratio [OR] = 22.195, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 12.209-40.350, P < 0.001), while pediatrics (OR = 4.036, 95% CI = 1.377-11.831, P = 0.011) and neuro-ophthalmology (OR = 4.158, 95% CI = 1.237-13.975, P = 0.021) in addition to oculoplastics (OR = 64.380, 95% CI = 26.306-157.560, P < 0.001) were predicted to have significantly greater opioid beneficiaries. Males, the South/Midwest, and graduating before 2005, all were generally associated with increased likelihood of greater total opioid claims, supply, beneficiaries, and prescription rate (P < 0.050). Conclusion: Subspecialty, demographic, chronological, and regional trends exist for opioid prescribing patterns in ophthalmology.

Continuous wound infusion catheter as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen for post-Caesarean delivery pain: a quality improvement impact study.

Background: The role of continuous wound infusion catheters as part of a multimodal analgesia strategy after Caesarean delivery is unclear. We introduced continuous wound infusion catheters to our multimodal analgesia regimen to evaluate the impact on analgesic outcomes after Caesarean delivery. Methods: After institutional review board (IRB) approval, a 4-month practice change was instituted as a quality improvement initiative. In addition to multimodal analgesia, continuous wound infusion catheters for up to 3 days were offered on alternate weeks for all women undergoing Caesarean deliveries. The primary outcome was postoperative in-hospital opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes were static and dynamic pain scores at 24 and 72 h, time until first analgesic request, opioid-related side-effects, length of stay, satisfaction (0-100%), and continuous wound infusion catheter-related complications. Results: All women scheduled for Caesarean delivery (n=139) in the 4-month period were included in the analysis, with 70 women receiving continuous wound infusion catheters, and 69 in the control group. Opioid consumption (continuous wound infusion catheter group 11.3 [7.5-61.9] mg morphine equivalents vs control group 30.0 [11.3-48.8] mg morphine equivalents), pain scores (except 24 h resting pain scores which were higher in the control group 2 [1-3] vs 1.5 [0-3] in the continous wound infusion catheters group; P=0.05), side-effects, length of stay, and complications were similar between groups. Satisfaction scores at 24 h were higher with continuous wound infusion catheters (100% [91-100%] vs 90% [86-100%]; P=0.003) with no differences at 72 h. One patient demonstrated symptoms of systemic local anaesthetic toxicity which resolved without significant harm. Conclusions: The addition of continuous wound infusion catheters to a multimodal analgesia regimen for post-Caesarean delivery pain management demonstrated minimal clinically significant analgesic benefits. Future studies are needed to explore the use of continuous wound infusion catheters in populations that may benefit most from this intervention.

Postoperative and postdischarge nausea and vomiting following ambulatory eye, head, and neck surgeries: a retrospective cohort study comparing incidence and associated factors.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory surgery is often followed by the development of nausea and/or vomiting (N/V). Although risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are frequently discussed, the distinction between PONV and postdischarge nausea and vomiting (PDNV) is unclear. This is especially troublesome given the potential consequences of postdischarge nausea and vomiting (PDNV), which include major discomfort and hospital readmission. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, data from 10,231 adult patients undergoing ambulatory ophthalmology or otolaryngology procedures with general anesthesia were collected and analyzed. Binary and multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the association between patient and anesthetic characteristics (including age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA P/S) classification, current smoker status, and intra- and postoperative opioid usage) and the odds ratios of experiencing only PDNV, only PONV, or both PONV and PDNV, as compared to not experiencing N/V at all. RESULTS: We found that 17.8% of all patients developed N/V (PONV and/or PDNV). Patients who experienced PONV had a 2.79 (95% confidence interval 2.24-3.46) times greater risk of reporting PDNV. Binary logistic regression found that younger age, opioid use, and female sex were associated with an increased likelihood of experiencing any N/V. Increased use of nitrous oxide and a higher ASA P/S class was associated with elevated likelihood of PONV, but not PDNV or PONV plus PDNV. CONCLUSIONS: Patients experiencing N/V in the PACU are observed to develop PDNV disproportionately by a factor of 2.79. The patients have distinct predictors, indicating important opportunities for care improvements beyond current guidelines.

Use of prescription opioids in Israel and socio-economic correlations between 2010 and 2020.

BACKGROUND: The use of opioids has increased dramatically over the past several years in Israel. The aim of this study was to explore the trends of opioid consumption in Israel over a decade (2010-2020) stratified by socioeconomic status (SES), residence in the periphery, and ethnic background. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included all adult Maccabi Healthcare Services (MHS) patients who filled at least one prescription for opioids during the past decade. In order to standardize dosages and compare different opioid medications, we used the Morphine Milligram Equivalent (MME) conversion factor. We performed The Mann-Kendall test with autocorrelation correction to assess each trend. We then checked the differences between the trends with the Mann-Whitney test (for periphery) and the Kruskal Wallis (for SES and ethnic background). RESULTS: Between the years 2010-2020, 261,270 MHS members met the study's inclusion criteria. The proportions of opioids consumption were 23.9/1000 patients in 2010 and 27.6/1000 patients in 2020, representing a 15% increase. The average daily consumption of opioids was 4.6 and 10.5 MME in 2010 and 2020, respectively, an increase of 227%. The daily MME during 2020 was higher for residents of the periphery compared to non-periphery residents (daily MME of 14.0 compared to 10.1, respectively). Average daily MME increased gradually during the study period for all levels of SES; the values were highest for the low SES group and the lowest for the high SES group (daily MME in 2020 for the lowest, middle, and high SES groups were 15.2 vs. 11.8 vs. 6.7 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights that the primary concern in the increase of opioid use is the increasing dosages. The increase in the number of patients using opioids is also significant but to a minor extent. These phenomena disproportionately impact vulnerable populations. Education programs should be offered to physicians regarding the possible harms of long-term use of opioids. These programs should emphasize the risk factors associated with the development of opioid use disorder (OUD) and the caution needed when increasing dosages or switching to higher-potency drugs. Pain clinics and centers for rehabilitation for patients with chronic pain or OUD should be available, not only in central areas but also in the periphery of the country. These clinics and centers should use a holistic approach and a multidisciplinary team that includes specialists in pain and addiction. They should be financially accessible for patients from low SES group and provide solutions in multiple languages.

Design and Implementation of an Opioid Scorecard for Hospital System-Wide Peer Comparison of Opioid Prescribing Habits: Observational Study.

Background: Reductions in opioid prescribing by health care providers can lead to a decreased risk of opioid dependence in patients. Peer comparison has been demonstrated to impact providers' prescribing habits, though its effect on opioid prescribing has predominantly been studied in the emergency department setting. Objective: The purpose of this study is to describe the development of an enterprise-wide opioid scorecard, the architecture of its implementation, and plans for future research on its effects. Methods: Using data generated by the author's enterprise vendor-based electronic health record, the enterprise analytics software, and expertise from a dedicated group of informaticists, physicians, and analysts, the authors developed an opioid scorecard that was released on a quarterly basis via email to all opioid prescribers at our institution. These scorecards compare providers' opioid prescribing habits on the basis of established metrics to those of their peers within their specialty throughout the enterprise. Results: At the time of this study's completion, 2034 providers have received at least 1 scorecard over a 5-quarter period ending in September 2021. Poisson regression demonstrated a 1.6% quarterly reduction in opioid prescribing, and chi-square analysis demonstrated pre-post reductions in the proportion of prescriptions longer than 5 days' duration and a morphine equivalent daily dose of >50. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first peer comparison effort with high-quality evidence-based metrics of this scale published in the literature. By sharing this process for designing the metrics and the process of distribution, the authors hope to influence other health systems to attempt to curb the opioid pandemic through peer comparison. Future research examining the effects of this intervention could demonstrate significant reductions in opioid prescribing, thus potentially reducing the progression of individual patients to opioid use disorder and the associated increased risk of morbidity and mortality.

Opioid Usage in Lumbar Disc Herniation Patients with Nonsurgical, Early Surgical, and Late Surgical Treatments.

OBJECTIVE: To assess opioid usage in surgical and nonsurgical patients with lumbar disc herniation receiving different treatments and timing of treatments. METHODS: Individuals with newly diagnosed lumbar intervertebral disc herniation without myelopathy were queried from a health claims database. Patients were categorized into 3 cohorts: nonsurgical, early surgery, and late surgery. Early surgery cohort patients underwent surgery within 30 days postdiagnosis; late surgery cohort patients had surgery after 30 days but before 1 year postdiagnosis. The index date was defined as the diagnosis date for nonsurgical patients and the initial surgery date for surgical patients. The primary outcome was the average daily opioid morphine milligram equivalents (MME) prescribed. Additional outcomes included percentage of opioid-using patients and cumulative opioid burden. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 573,082 patients: 533,226 patients received nonsurgical treatments, 22,312 patients received early surgery, and 17,544 patients received late surgery. Both surgical cohorts experienced a postsurgical increase in opioid usage, which then sharply declined and gradually plateaued, with daily opioid MME consistently lower in the early versus late surgery cohort. The early surgery cohort also consistently had a lower prevalence of opioid-using patients than the late surgery cohort. Patients receiving nonsurgical treatment demonstrated the highest 1-year post index cumulative opioid burden, and the early surgery cohort consistently had lower cumulative opioid MME than the late surgery cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Early surgery in patients with lumbar disc herniation is associated with lower long-term average daily MME, incidence of opioid use, and 1-year cumulative MME burden compared with nonsurgical and late surgery treatment approaches.

Quantifying unused opioids following emergency and ambulatory care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: To quantify unused opioids among adult and pediatric patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) or ambulatory care settings with a prescription for acute pain. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINHAL, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library, and the gray literature from inception to April 29, 2021. We included observational studies in which any patient with an acutely painful condition received a prescription for an opioid on discharge from an outpatient care setting, and unused opioids were quantified. Two reviewers screened records for eligibility, extracted data, and conducted the quality assessment. Where possible, we pooled data and otherwise described the results of studies narratively. Total unused prescriptions were synthesized using a weighted average. Random effects models were used, and heterogeneity was measured by the I2 statistic. Our primary outcome was the quantity of unused opioid medication available after receiving a prescription for acute pain. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients with unused opioids following a prescription, the proportion of patients using no opioids, morphine equivalents of unused opioids, and factors associated with leftover opioids. Results: In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 9 studies in emergency and ambulatory care settings, 59.6% of prescribed opioids remained unused; pediatric patients had 69.3% of their prescriptions remaining, compared to 54.6% among adult patients. The highest proportion of unused opioids was found following dental extractions (82.6%). Conclusions and Relevance: More than 50% of opioids remain unused following prescriptions for acute pain. Responsible prescribing must be accompanied by education on safer use, storage, and disposal.

Liposomal bupivacaine addition versus standard bupivacaine alone for colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Aim: This study evaluated use of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) versus standard bupivacaine (SB) alone in quadratus lumborum (QL) blocks for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Materials & methods: In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, patients received QL1 blocks with either LB (40 ml 0.125% SB plus 20 ml of LB) or SB (60 ml of 0.25% SB) with 30 ml per side. Opioid usage, pain scores, side effects and other medications were recorded. Results: For 78 patients (38 LB; 40 SB), all parameters were similar between groups, except that the LB group had a higher 48 h need for metoclopramide. Conclusion: LB provided no analgesic benefit over SB alone for QL blocks. Clinical Trials registration number: NCT03702621.

Lay abstract This study evaluated use of extended release bupivacaine (LB) versus standard bupivacaine (SB) alone in nerve blocks for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Patients undergoing colorectal surgery received nerve blocks with either LB combined with SB, or SB alone. Opioid usage, pain scores, side effects and other medications were recorded. For 78 patients (38 LB + SB; 40 SB), all parameters were similar between groups, except that the LB group had a higher 48 h need for anti-nausea medication. LB provided no pain control benefit over SB alone for nerve blocks in colorectal surgery.

Factors Associated With Increasing Length of Stay for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty and Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are cost-effective procedures that decrease pain and improve health-related quality of life for patients with advanced symptomatic arthritis, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients with RA have a longer length of stay (LOS) after THA or TKA than patients with osteoarthritis, yet the factors contributing to LOS have not been investigated. Purpose: We sought to identify the factors contributing to LOS for patients with RA undergoing THA and TKA at a single tertiary care orthopedic specialty hospital. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from a prospectively collected cohort of 252 RA patients undergoing either THA or TKA. Demographics, RA characteristics, medications, serologies, and disease activity were collected preoperatively. Linear regression was performed to explore the relationship between LOS (log-transformed) and possible predictors. A multivariate model was constructed through backward selection using significant predictors from a univariate analysis. Results: Of the 252 patients with RA, 83% were women; they had a median disease duration of 14 years and moderate disease activity at the time of arthroplasty. We had LOS data on 240 (95%) of the cases. The mean LOS was 3.4 ± 1.5 days. The multivariate analysis revealed a longer LOS for RA patients who underwent TKA versus THA, were women versus men, required a blood transfusion, and took preoperative opioids. Conclusion: Our retrospective study found that increased postoperative LOS in RA patients undergoing THA or TKA was associated with factors both non-modifiable (type of surgery, sex) and modifiable (postoperative blood transfusion, preoperative opioid use). These findings suggest that preoperative optimization of the patient with RA might focus on improving anemia and reducing opioid use in efforts to shorten LOS. More rigorous study is warranted.

Post-operative Opioid, Benzodiazepine and Sedative Usage in Medicare versus Commercial Insurance Hand Surgery Patients.

BACKGROUND: Opioid usage has increased in recent years. The purpose of this study is to assess post-operative opioid, sedative, and benzodiazepine usage in a Medicare population. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing elbow, wrist, and hand surgery by hand surgeons at one academic outpatient surgical center were prospectively enrolled. Patients were excluded if they were minors or if they underwent more than one surgical procedure during the study period. There were 269 patients enrolled, and this group was divided by insurance type into younger commercial insurance (CI) and older Medicare (MC) groups. The Pennsylvania Physician Drug Monitoring Program website was used to document all prescriptions of controlled substances filled six months prior to and after the surgical procedure. RESULTS: The mean age in the CI group was 45.8 years (range: 16-88) and 69.2 years (range: 43-91) in the MC group. Postoperatively, the CI patients filled significantly less opioid prescriptions than the MC group, 1.10 vs. 1.79. Patients in the CI group were given an average of 0.3 benzodiazepine prescriptions before surgery and 0.2 after surgery. Patients in the MC group were given 0.6 prescriptions before and 0.5 prescriptions of benzodiazepines after surgery. The CI group was given an average of 0.1 sedative/hypnotic prescriptions before surgery and 0.1 after surgery. The MC group was given 0.7 prescriptions before and 0.4 prescriptions of sedative/hypnotics after surgery.There were 0.17 prescriptions per patient in the CI group and 0.75 per patient in the MC group (P <.05). Twenty-two of 208 (10.6%) of CI and 16/61 (26.2%) of MC patients filled a prescription between 3-8 months post-operatively. CONCLUSION: Prolonged use of opioid, benzodiazepine and sedative medications is common after upper extremity surgical procedures. Older patients are also at risk, and may be even more likely than younger patients to use these medications post-operatively.

Clinical efficacy of ultrasound guided bilateral erector spinae block for single-level lumbar fusion surgery: a prospective, randomized, case-control study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Postoperative experience plays a vital role in patient recovery and does not depend on the type and quality of the surgical procedure alone. Non-opioid therapies have become part of the multimodal analgesic regimen for better pain control and reduced opioid-related side effects. Most recently evolved among these are the regional anesthetic techniques, such as the thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block and the erector spinae (ESP) block. PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of ultrasound-guided (US) ESP block for postoperative analgesia after a single level lumbar spine fusion surgery compared with conventional (opioid-based) multimodal postoperative analgesia. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled, and double-blinded clinical trial. PATIENT SAMPLE: A 100 consecutive patients requiring single-level lumbar spinal fusion procedure were randomized into two groups- block (multimodal analgesia with US-ESP) and control (only multimodal analgesia) groups. OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic and surgical data, intra-operative blood loss, duration of surgery, total opioid consumption (TOC) and amount of muscle relaxants used were assessed. Postoperatively, the Numeric pain Rating Scale(NRS), Modified Observer's assessment of Alertness and/or Sedation Scale (MOASS) and Patient satisfaction scores were recorded every 2 hours for the first 6 hours followed by every 6 hours for 24 hours. Continuous variables were analyzed using Student's t-test, and categorical variables were analyzed using either the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. p-value < .05 was considered statistically significant. METHODS: Patients in both groups underwent the identical protocol for pre-emptive analgesia and induction of anesthesia. Patients in the block group received the US-ESP block after induction and positioning, followed by the multimodal analgesia, while the control group received only the multimodal analgesia. RESULTS: Both groups had identical demographic backgrounds and surgical profile. TOC for 24 hours following induction was significantly lower in the block group than the control group (105.0 ± 15.15 vs 158.00 ± 23.38mcg; p < .001). The total muscle relaxant consumption during surgery was also significantly less in the block group than the control group (51.90 ± 3.17 vs 57.70 ± 5.90; p < .001). The intra-operative blood loss was significantly less (p < .001) in the block group (303.00 ± 86.55 ml) than the control group (437.00 ± 116.85 ml). Compared to the block group, the control group's pain score (NRS) was significantly higher in the first 48 hours following surgery. The MOASS score was significantly lower in the control group (4.46 ± 0.50 vs 3.82 ± 0.82; p < .001) in the immediate postoperative period. The satisfaction score was significantly higher in the block group than the control group (9.52 ± 0.65 vs 8.22 ± 0.79; p < .001). CONCLUSION: The employed US-ESP block for single-level lumbar fusion surgery is an effective component of multimodal analgesia for reducing blood loss, total opioid consumption, and related side effects with a significant reduction of postoperative pain and higher patient satisfaction.

Perioperative steroid administration improves knee function and reduces opioid consumption in bilateral total knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: The benefits of steroid usage have been well described for unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA), however it's benefits in bilateral TKA has not been well published in the literature. We describe the impact of perioperative steroid administration in a cohort of bilateral TKAs (74 knees) with regard to immediate postoperative knee function, postoperative knee strength and opioid consumption. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report on a single-surgeon consecutive case series of simultaneously-performed bilateral TKAs. Eighteen patients received 2 doses of 8 mg IV dexamethasone in the perioperative setting. There were 19 patients in the control group. Primary outcome measures were day 1 postoperative knee flexion (degrees), knee strength and postoperative analgesic requirements (mg/mcg). Morphine dose equivalents (MDE) were calculated to compare all opioid-based analgesics. Secondary outcomes included post-operative pain according to the VAS (at 24, 48 and 72 h), anti-emetic requirements (mg) and length of stay (days). RESULTS: The mean knee flexion achieved day 1 in the steroid group was 70.1°(σ = 17.64, 95% CI 64.1-76.0) compared to 55.8° in the non-steroid group (σ = 19.8, 95% CI 49.2-62.3) (p = 0.0008). Regarding the straight leg raise, 88.9% of the steroid group were able to achieve this compared to only 55.2% of the non-steroid group (p = 0.002). There was a reduction in the MDE requirement per patient across all medications for the 'steroid' group. Both Targin® (p = 0.03) (Prolonged-Release Oxycodone) and Fentanyl (p = 0.01) requirements were significantly reduced in the 'steroid' group. CONCLUSION: We recommend the use of perioperative steroids in bilateral TKA to allow accelerated rehabilitation, improved immediate knee function and an overall reduction in the consumption of potentially problematic opioid-based analgesics.

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty demonstrates decreased postoperative pain and opioid usage compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty.

AIMS: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) has been introduced to provide accurate bone cuts and help achieve the target knee alignment, along with symmetric gap balancing. The purpose of this study was to determine if any early clinical benefits could be realized following TKA using robotic-assisted technology. METHODS: In all, 140 consecutive patients undergoing RA-TKA and 127 consecutive patients undergoing conventional TKA with minimum six-week follow-up were reviewed. Differences in visual analogue scores (VAS) for pain at rest and with activity, postoperative opiate usage, and length of stay (LOS) between the RA-TKA and conventional TKA groups were compared. RESULTS: Patients undergoing RA-TKA had lower average VAS pain scores at rest (p = 0.001) and with activity (p = 0.03) at two weeks following the index procedure. At the six-week interval, the RA-TKA group had lower VAS pain scores with rest (p = 0.03) and with activity (p = 0.02), and required 3.2 mg less morphine equivalents per day relative to the conventional group (p < 0.001). At six weeks, a significantly greater number of patients in the RA-TKA group were free of opioid use compared to the conventional TKA group; 70.7% vs 57.0% (p = 0.02). Patients in the RA-TKA group had a shorter LOS; 1.9 days versus 2.3 days (p < 0.001), and also had a greater percentage of patient discharged on postoperative day one; 41.3% vs 20.5% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing RA-TKA had lower pain levels at both rest and with activity, required less opioid medication, and had a shorter LOS.

Leftover opioids following adult surgical procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: US opioid prescribing and use escalated over the last two decades, with parallel increases in opioid misuse, opioid-related deaths, and concerns about diversion. Postoperatively prescribed opioids contribute to these problems. Policy makers have addressed this issue by limiting postoperative opioid prescribing. However, until recently, little data existed to guide prescribers on opioid needs postoperatively. This meta-analysis quantitatively integrated the growing literature regarding extent of opioids leftover after surgery and identified factors associated with leftover opioid proportions. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of observational studies quantifying postoperative opioid consumption in North American adults, and evaluated effect size moderators using robust variance estimation meta-regression. Medline, EMBASE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for relevant articles published January 1, 2000 to November 10, 2018. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool assessed risk of study bias. The proportion effect size quantified the primary outcome: proportion of prescribed postoperative opioids leftover at the time of follow-up. Primary meta-regression analyses tested surgical type, amount of opioids prescribed, and study publication year as possible moderators. Secondary meta-regression models included surgical invasiveness, age, race, gender, postoperative day of data collection, and preoperative opioid use. RESULTS: We screened 911 citations and included 44 studies (13,068 patients). The mean weighted effect size for proportion of postoperative opioid prescriptions leftover was 61% (95% CI, 56-67%). Meta-regression models revealed type of surgical procedure and level of invasiveness had a statistically significant effect on proportion of opioids leftover. Proportion of opioids leftover was greater for "other soft tissue" surgeries than abdominal/pelvic surgeries, but did not differ significantly between orthopedic and abdominal/pelvic surgeries. Minimally invasive compared to open surgeries resulted in a greater proportion of opioids leftover. Limitations include predominance of studies from academic settings, inconsistent reporting of confounders, and a possible publication bias toward studies reporting smaller leftover opioid proportions. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: A significant proportion of opioids are leftover postoperatively. Surgery type and level of invasiveness affect postoperative opioid consumption. Integration of such factors into prescribing guidelines may help minimize opioid overprescribing while adequately meeting analgesic needs.

Feasibility study of an online modifiable Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol with specific focus on opioid avoidance.

BACKGROUND: The high and increasing rate of opioid use is a serious issue in the Western world affecting the population's physical and mental health. In most cases, opioid dependency starts with prescriptions by medical professionals, so efforts aimed at reducing in-hospital opioid use should result in less long-term dependency. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the feasibility of implementing an opioid-scarce protocol as part of a new online modifiable Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (mERAS) programme. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective study was conducted comparing a cohort treated under the new opioid-scarce mERAS protocol (n = 96; May 2018-Nov 2018) to those treated under the original ERAS protocol (n = 84; November 2017-April 2018). The primary outcome was the quantity and duration of opioid use. RESULTS: Fewer patients used fentanyl via intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in the mERAS group (54% versus 70%; P = 0.03). The mERAS group was also less likely to use oral oxycodone (80% versus 99%; P < 0.0001) and for a shorter duration (median 3 versus 5 days; P = 0.0002). More local anaesthetic transversus abdominis plane catheters were used in the mERAS group (34% versus 6% in the control group; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Opioid use can be significantly reduced after elective colorectal surgery by employing an opioid-scarce ERAS protocol. Further data is required to confirm the clinical benefits of this approach.

A prospective randomized study to analyze the efficacy of balanced pre-emptive analgesia in spine surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Surgical procedures involving the spine are known to cause moderate to severe postoperative pain. Inadequate management of acute pain in the postoperative period results in higher morbidity, and consequently may lead to chronic pain caused by central sensitization. The role of pre-emptive analgesia (PA) and intraoperative analgesia in management of postoperative pain has gained precedence over recent years. Pathophysiology of postoperative pain in spine surgery is unique, as it is a combination of nociceptive, inflammatory, and neuronal stimuli. Blockage of all three stimuli in the perioperative period by pre-emptively administrating a combination of paracetamol (P), ketorolac (K), and pregabalin (PR) might help in adequate management and alleviation of acute postoperative pain. PURPOSE: To evaluate the analgesic effect of a combination of P, K, and PR as pre-emptive multimodal analgesia, aimed to block or reduce acute postoperative pain after spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled, and double-blinded clinical trial. PATIENT SAMPLE: After Institutional Review Board approval, 100 consecutive patients requiring single- or double level spinal fusion procedures were randomized into two groups-PA and control (C). METHODS: The PA group received P, K, and PR 4 hours before surgery, as PA. Both groups underwent identical anesthetic and postoperative pain management protocol. OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic and surgical data, 4 hourly postoperative pain levels-Numeric Pain Rating scale (NRS), Ambulatory NRS scores; level of consciousness-Ramsay sedation scale, total amount of opioids consumed (TOC) through patient-controlled analgesia; functional levels-Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), surgical satisfaction index-North American Spine Society (NASS) satisfaction scale, duration of hospital stay, and all complications were recorded and analyzed. A research grant of 6,032 USD was obtained from AO Spine toward this work. There is no conflict to disclose. RESULTS: Both the groups had identical demographic backgrounds and surgical profiles. The average NRS score within the first 48-hour period in the PA group (2.7±0.79) was significantly less than the C group (3.4±0.98) and the differences were more in the first 12 hours following surgery. Similarly, Ambulatory NRS scores were significantly low in the PA group during the first and second postoperative days. The PA group individuals were found to be more physically motivated, as 95.7% were able to ambulate 50 m on the first postoperative day compared with 30% in the C group. The PA group had significantly low TOC (3.02±2.29 mg) in comparison to the C group (4.94±3.08 mg). The duration of hospital stay was 4.17±1.02 and 4.84±1.62 days in the PA and C groups (p=.017), respectively. No major complications occurred in either groups and were found to be similar in percentage between both the groups, except for nausea and vomiting which were more in C group. Dry mouth was the most common side effect noted irrespective of the groups. All patients had significant improvement in ODI with better results in PA group at first month follow up. The PA group (97.90%) was extremely satisfied compared with C group (72%, p=.002) according to NASS scale. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative pain management in spine surgery is maximized if perioperative painful stimuli can be inhibited, which requires adequate blood levels of analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and neuropathic drugs intraoperatively. The employed strategy of preoperative administration of balanced analgesia with a combination of P, K, and PR, each having different mechanisms of action, resulted in lesser pain intensity, allowed better ambulation tolerance, improved functional outcomes and has also reduced the requirement of opioids and duration of hospital stay with no additional complications. Thus, this balanced analgesia administered preoperatively would address the complicated postsurgical pain.