The Emergence of Collaboration in the Education of Fellows and Residents during COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has created a void in surgical education. Given social distancing and postponed surgeries, unique educational opportunities have arisen. Attendings from 10 adult reconstruction fellowships led a multi-institution web-based weekly collaborative, the Arthroplasty Consortium (AC), developed to educate trainees through complex arthroplasty case-based discussions. METHODS: We performed an anonymous survey of AC participants and American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) adult reconstruction fellows. Participants were polled with regards to educational tools used before and after COVID-19 and their value. Specifically, participation in the AC, AAHKS FOCAL (Fellows Orthopedic Continued AAHKS Learning) lectures, institutional lectures, industry lectures, textbooks, online videos, journal articles, and webinars was assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-seven participants responded with 49 (86%) at the fellow level. There was an increase in the use of web-based learning, including the AC (Not applicable pre, 61% post), AAHKS FOCAL lectures (Not applicable pre, 82% post), industry lectures (53% pre, 86% post), and AAHKS/AAOS webinars (35% pre, 56% post). Usage declined with institutional lectures (89% pre, 80% post), textbooks (68% pre, 49% post), and journal articles (97% pre, 90% post), with minimal change in the use of online surgical videos (84% pre, 82% post). The majority of fellows not involved in the AC would like to see the addition of a multi-institutional case conference added to fellowship education. Of AC participants, the 2 most valuable educational tools were the AC and FOCAL lectures. CONCLUSION: Trainee education has changed post-COVID-19 with a greater focus on web-based learning. Multi-institutional collaborative lectures and case-based discussions have significant perceived value among trainees and should be considered important educational tools post-COVID 19.

Inadequate Performance of ChatGPT on Orthopedic Board-Style Written Exams.

BACKGROUND: Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot capable of delivering human-like responses to a seemingly infinite number of inquiries. For the technology to perform certain healthcare-related tasks or act as a study aid, the technology should have up-to-date knowledge and the ability to reason through medical information. The purpose of this study was to assess the orthopedic knowledge and reasoning ability of ChatGPT by querying it with orthopedic board-style questions. METHODOLOGY: We queried ChatGPT (GPT-3.5) with a total of 472 questions from the Orthobullets dataset (n = 239), the 2022 Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) (n = 124), and the 2021 OITE (n = 109). The importance, difficulty, and category were recorded for questions from the Orthobullets question bank. Responses were assessed for answer choice correctness if the explanation given matched that of the dataset, answer integrity, and reason for incorrectness. RESULTS: ChatGPT correctly answered 55.9% (264/472) of questions and, of those answered correctly, gave an explanation that matched that of the dataset for 92.8% (245/264) of the questions. The chatbot used information internal to the question in all responses (100%) and used information external to the question (98.3%) as well as logical reasoning (96.4%) in most responses. There was no significant difference in the proportion of questions answered correctly between the datasets (P = 0.62). There was no significant difference in the proportion of questions answered correctly by question category (P = 0.67), importance (P = 0.95), or difficulty (P = 0.87) within the Orthobullets dataset questions. ChatGPT mostly got questions incorrect due to information error (i.e., failure to identify the information required to answer the question) (81.7% of incorrect responses). CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT performs below a threshold likely to pass the American Board of Orthopedic Surgery (ABOS) Part I written exam. The chatbot's performance on the 2022 and 2021 OITEs was between the average performance of an intern and to second-year resident. A major limitation of the current model is the failure to identify the information required to correctly answer the questions.

Evaluating ChatGPT's Capabilities on Orthopedic Training Examinations: An Analysis of New Image Processing Features.

Introduction The efficacy of integrating artificial intelligence (AI) models like ChatGPT into the medical field, specifically orthopedic surgery, has yet to be fully determined. The most recent adaptation of ChatGPT that has yet to be explored is its image analysis capabilities. This study assesses ChatGPT's performance in answering Orthopedic In-Training Examination (OITE) questions, including those that require image analysis. Methods Questions from the 2014, 2015, 2021, and 2022 AAOS OITE were screened for inclusion. All questions without images were entered into ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0 twice. Questions that necessitated the use of images were only entered into ChatGPT 4.0 twice, as this is the only version of the system that can analyze images. The responses were recorded and compared to AAOS's correct answers, evaluating the AI's accuracy and precision. Results A total of 940 questions were included in the final analysis (457 questions with images and 483 questions without images). ChatGPT 4.0 performed significantly better on questions that did not require image analysis (67.81% vs 47.59%, p<0.001). Discussion While the use of AI in orthopedics is an intriguing possibility, this evaluation demonstrates how, even with the addition of image processing capabilities, ChatGPT still falls short in terms of its accuracy. As AI technology evolves, ongoing research is vital to harness AI's potential effectively, ensuring it complements rather than attempts to replace the nuanced skills of orthopedic surgeons.

Coaching in Sports Medicine.

Similar to elite athletes, surgeons use their skills on a daily basis but coaching for skillset refinement is not common among surgeons. Surgeon coaching has been proposed a method by which surgeons can gain insight into their performance and optimize their practice. However, many barriers exist to surgeon coaching such as logistics, time, cost, and pride. Ultimately, the tangible improvement in surgeon performance, the elevation of surgeon well-being, the optimization of the practice, and better patient outcomes support a wider implementation of surgeon coaching for surgeons at all stages of their career.

OrthoACCESS: Implementing a Sub-Internship Curriculum for MS4s Applying to Orthopaedic Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Medical students pursuing orthopedic surgery residency build foundational knowledge during clinical rotations. Most clinical rotations, home and away, were paused during the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the lack of structured fourth-year medical student (MS4) education for basic orthopedics, educators developed the Ortho Acting-Intern Coordinated Clinical Education and Surgical Skills (OrthoACCESS) curriculum in 2019. This study demonstrates the accessibility and usability of a MS4 virtual orthopedic curriculum and examines the curriculum's role in increasing learner familiarity with basic orthopedic topics in 2020. DESIGN: OrthoACCESS faculty presented weekly lectures from July to October 2020 using Zoom Webinar. Website content included recorded webinars, external resources, and skills videos. Registrants were anonymously surveyed after each webinar characterizing the knowledge and utility of individual lectures. After the webinar series, registrants were emailed an anonymous post-curriculum survey characterizing their experience using the OrthoACCESS curriculum. RESULTS: OrthoACCESS had 1062 registrants, with 59% (624/1,062) MS4s. 4528 users accessed the OrthoACCESS website from 66 countries. The 15 lectures were viewed 3743 times, 1553 live views and 2190 asynchronous views. 444 postwebinar surveys were completed. Weekly response rates ranged from 18% to 45%. Respondents felt more knowledgeable and more able to apply their knowledge after viewing each lecture (p < 0.001), and found the webinars to be well-organized, well-paced, enthusiastically taught, and level-appropriate. 122/976 (13%) students and 45/291 (15%) faculty completed the postcurriculum survey. Faculty reported that OrthoACCESS was "quite useful" (4 [3-5]) for providing knowledge for an incoming orthopaedic intern. Faculty and students would recommend OrthoACCESS to future learners (5 [4-5]). CONCLUSIONS: OrthoACCESS delivered foundational musculoskeletal instruction during a period of increased need. In its initial iteration, this virtual curriculum demonstrated high utilization in the United States and internationally and improved participants' self-reported topical knowledge and ability to apply it clinically.

Three-Dimensional Printing Model Enhances Correct Identification and Understanding of Pelvic Fracture in Medical Students.

OBJECTIVE: Understanding the anatomy behind a pelvic fracture can be a significant challenge to medical students. Recent advances in three-dimensional printing technology offers a novel approach to facilitate the learning of complex fracture. We have described here how the 3-dimension printing (3Dp) models can help medical students improve their understanding in and identification of pelvic fractures. DESIGN: One hundred students were randomized into 2 teaching module groups (with or without 3Dp models). Prior to randomization assignment, a 50-minute didactic lecture covering elementary knowledge of anatomy, Young-Burgess classification, and traumatic mechanism of pelvic fracture was delivered to all students. The 3Dp group received X-rays, CT images, and 3Dp models of the eight pelvic fractures during presentation, while the students in the control group only obtained X-rays and CT scans of the same 8 pelvic fractures. Young-Burgess classification system and injury mechanism of pelvic fracture, time for evaluation, and subjective questions were conducted to assess the learning outcomes. SETTING: A medical student program based in a LevelⅠtrauma center PARTICIPANTS: One hundred students in their 4th year of a 5-year clinical medicine program (for a medical bachelor degree) RESULTS: Students receiving 3Dp model had a higher rate of identifying the correct pelvic fracture via Young-Burgess identification compared to these without 3Dp model. Moreover, the accuracy of identifying the injury mechanism was significantly higher in the 3Dp group than that in group without 3Dp model. Participant in 3Dp group had faster assessment time compared to the control group. Subjective survey results suggested that 3Dp model would increase the learning interest and enhance the understanding of pelvic fracture. In addition, majority of students (83%) reported that they would like to use 3Dp model in other surgical course education. CONCLUSIONS: 3Dp model increased the perceived accuracy of pelvic fracture identification and understanding of injury mechanism. Moreover, 3Dp model promoted the subjective interest and motivation of students in pelvic fracture learning. Therefore, 3Dp model can be considered as a valuable educational tool for learning pelvic fracture in medical students.

Effectiveness of synchronous vs asynchronous faculty aid in learning how to diagnose, plan and perform a 44C ankle fracture osteosynthesis in a synthetic bone model.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted educational activities since 2020. AO Trauma Latin American courses took place in a blended modality during 2021 and participant's feedback was positive. In this study, we aim to identify if there was any difference in learning, planning, and executing an osteosynthesis on a bone model with synchronous or asynchronous faculty support during an online asynchronous learning program. MATERIAL AND METHODS: we designed an online asynchronous course designed for teaching about trimalleolar ankle fractures. We randomized twenty participants into two groups: the control group had synchronous faculty support and the intervention group had asynchronous faculty support. Participants were evaluated with initial and final quizzes, preoperative planning, and execution of an osteosynthesis on a bone model. Comparisons of scores between CG and IG were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric variables. A two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: we did not find a significant difference between synchronous or asynchronous faculty support during our asynchronous learning program in quiz results, preoperative planning, global rating scale or the result of the osteosynthesis as compared to the preoperative plan. CONCLUSION: there appears to be no difference in participant learning with synchronous or asynchronous faculty support during an online, asynchronous course. Asynchronous activities appear to be effective teaching methods and should be considered in continuous medical education in orthopedics. Larger studies are needed to identify differences in participant learning outcomes between synchronous and asynchronous faculty support models.

INTRODUCCIÓN: la pandemia de COVID-19 ha interrumpido las actividades educativas desde 2020. Los cursos de AO Trauma Latinoamérica se realizaron en modalidad semipresencial durante 2021 y la retroalimentación de los participantes fue positiva. En este estudio, nuestro objetivo es identificar si hubo alguna diferencia en el aprendizaje, la planificación y la ejecución de una osteosíntesis en un modelo óseo con el apoyo sincrónico o asincrónico de la facultad durante un programa de aprendizaje asincrónico en línea. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: diseñamos un curso asíncrono en línea para la enseñanza de las fracturas trimaleolares de tobillo. Se distribuyó aleatoriamente a 20 participantes en dos grupos: el grupo de control tuvo apoyo docente sincrónico y el grupo de intervención tuvo apoyo docente asincrónico. Se evaluó a los participantes con cuestionarios iniciales y finales, planificación preoperatoria y ejecución de una osteosíntesis en un modelo óseo. Las comparaciones de las puntuaciones entre GC e GI se realizaron mediante la prueba U de Mann-Whitney para variables no paramétricas. Una p de dos colas < 0.05 se consideró estadísticamente significativa. RESULTADOS: no encontramos diferencia significativa entre el apoyo del profesorado síncrono o asíncrono durante nuestro programa de aprendizaje asíncrono en los resultados de los cuestionarios, la planificación preoperatoria, la escala de valoración global o el resultado de la osteosíntesis en comparación con el plan preoperatorio. CONCLUSIÓN: no parece haber diferencias en el aprendizaje de los participantes con el apoyo sincrónico o asincrónico del profesorado durante un curso en línea asincrónico. Las actividades asíncronas parecen ser métodos de enseñanza eficaces y deberían tenerse en cuenta en la formación médica continua en ortopedia. Se necesitan estudios más amplios para identificar las diferencias en los resultados de aprendizaje de los participantes entre los modelos de apoyo docente síncrono y asíncrono.

Effects of the SARS-CoV­2 pandemic on residency training in orthopedics and traumatology in Germany : A nationwide survey.

BACKGROUND: The spread of the coronavirus disease has impacted healthcare systems worldwide; however, restrictions due to the SARS-CoV­2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) pandemic are particularly drastic for physicians in residency training. Imposed restrictions interrupt the standard educational curricula, and consequently limited residents to meet mandatory requirements. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the SARS-CoV­2 pandemic on residency training in orthopedics and trauma surgery in Germany. METHODOLOGY: An online-based, voluntary, and anonymous survey of physicians in residency training for orthopedics and trauma surgery was conducted. Through email lists of junior physician organizations the survey was sent to 789 physicians. Participation was possible between October and November 2021. RESULTS: A total of 95 participants (female 41.1%) with a mean age of 31.3 ± 2.8 years were analyzed. In the everyday clinical practice and care 80% of participants thought that they were set back in time of their general training due to the pandemic. There was an average reduction of 25.0% in time spent in the OR and 88.4% agreed that their surgical training was delayed due to the pandemic. Of the respondents 33.6% were able to attend external continuing education courses. Only 4.2% were able to invest more time in research and 55.8% of participants agreed that their residency training will be extended due to the pandemic. CONCLUSION: The COVID pandemic has had a significant impact on the residency training in orthopedics and trauma surgery in Germany. In almost all areas of training, residents had to accept restrictions due to the imposed restrictions, which potentially negatively affected their training.

An Orthopaedic Virtual Clinical Clerkship for Visiting Medical Students: Early Successes and Future Implications.

OBJECTIVE: The visiting orthopaedic clerkship is viewed by both students and program directors as an important part of the orthopaedic surgery residency application process, despite being criticized as costly and inefficient. Restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic prevented students from participating in in-person clerkships at institutions other than at their home programs, necessitating a virtual replacement for the in-person orthopaedics clerkship experience. It remains unclear how the virtual clerkships will affect the application process this year, and moving forward. We describe and review our institution's initial experience with a virtual orthopaedic clerkship. We hypothesize that students would view the virtual clerkship as valuable, and that students would see a role for such clerkships going forward. DESIGN: A virtual orthopaedic surgery clerkship was created and students were invited to enroll. Thirty-one 4th-year medical students participated. Each clerkship included 8 two-hour sessions. Each session was moderated by a faculty member, and participants included only medical students. Students presented virtual cases, which provided the basis for the discussion and education. At the conclusion of each clerkship, students were given an anonymous survey assessing various aspects of the clerkship. RESULTS: Twenty-seven students responded to the survey. Overall, 15 students rated the experience as outstanding, 11 excellent, and 1 good. Twenty-two students saw a role for virtual clerkships moving forward, and five students did not see a role moving forward. Student reported strengths of the clerkship included direct faculty interaction, structured curriculum, and student-centered discussions. Lack of hands-on experience was cited as the biggest weakness. CONCLUSIONS: Students valued the opportunity for a virtual clerkship, and most could envision a role for such virtual clerkships moving forward. We suggest that virtual clerkships may be a cost-effective and useful tool in helping both students and programs navigate the residency selection process.

The Perry Initiative's Impact on Gender Diversity Within Orthopedic Education.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Orthopedic surgery lags behind the other surgical specialties in terms of reaching gender equality, and women remain underrepresented in the field. The reason for this disparity is multifaceted, with lack of exposure and mentorship frequently cited as two key reasons women fail to choose orthopedic surgery as a specialty. Recognizing these gender differences, The Perry Initiative was founded to increase young women's exposure to the field, provide mentorship opportunities, and recruit women into orthopedic surgery and related engineering fields. The purpose of this article is to describe the measurable impact of The Perry Initiative on increasing the number of women matriculating into orthopedic residencies. RECENT FINDINGS: Though roughly half of medical school graduates today are women, only 16% of active orthopedic surgery residents are women. To date, The Perry Initiative has reached over 12,000 women in high school and medical school, and of the program participants who are eligible to match into any residency program, 20% matched into orthopedic surgery residencies. This indicates that the women who participated in Perry Initiative outreach programs are entering orthopedic surgery at a rate that is higher than the current rate of women entering orthopedic surgery. The model behind The Perry Initiative's outreach efforts can be scaled and expanded, ideally reaching more women and making progress towards closing the gender gap within orthopedic surgery and achieving greater gender diversity.

Failure affects subjective estimates of cognitive load through a negative carry-over effect in virtual reality simulation of hip fracture surgery.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive overload can impair learning, and different factors might affect cognitive load during simulation-based training. In this study, we investigate the role of failure in repeated practice of virtual reality (VR) simulation of hip fracture surgery on cognitive load (CL) estimated by secondary-task reaction time test and two questionnaires. METHODS: The VR simulation training program consisted of three competency levels of increasing complexity starting with the placement of a Kirschner wire in a fractured hip of one patient, adding clinical variability at the intermediate level, and performing the entire dynamic hip screw procedure in 24 different patients at the highest level. Thirteen consecutive passed simulations were required to advance to the next level. Performance was measured as passing/failing a procedure and the number of failed procedures within the latest three and five simulations. CL was measured objectively using reaction time testing during simulation and subjectively using the NASA-TLX and PAAS questionnaires. The study was carried out at a simulation center from November 2016 to March 2019. Forty-two first-year orthopedic surgery residents from the Central Denmark Region and the North Denmark Region participated in the training program. RESULTS: A failing performance in the simulated procedure was associated with a higher CL than passing a procedure. The subjective CL estimates were affected by the number of failures during last three and five procedures with a higher number of failures being associated with a higher CL. In contrast, relative reaction time estimates of CL were not affected by previous failures. CONCLUSIONS: Questionnaires for estimation of CL seem to be affected by participant frustration after failure-a meta-cognitive "carry-over" effect. This could be a general limitation of the subjective questionnaire approach to estimate CL. Reducing CL through instructional design and handling of participant frustration might improve the learning outcome of simulation training programs.

Learning Acetabular Fracture Classification using a Three-Dimensional Interactive Software: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Acetabular fractures are a real challenge for junior doctors as well as experienced orthopedic surgeons. Correct fracture classification is crucial for appreciating the fracture type, surgical planning, and predicting prognosis. Although three-dimensional (3D) tutorial is believed to improve the understanding of the complex anatomy structure, there have been few applications and randomized controlled trials to confirm it in orthopedics. This study aims to develop a 3D interactive software system for teaching acetabular fracture classification and evaluate its efficacy. Participants were randomly but evenly allocated into either the experimental group (who learned the acetabular fracture classification using a 3D software) or the control group (who used a traditional two-dimensional [2D] tutorial). Both groups were then tasked to classify 10 acetabular fractures and complete a five-point Likert scale on their satisfaction of each learning modality. To calculate significance (P < 0.05), independent t-test was used for normally distributed data whereas Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed data. The experimental group significantly outperformed the control group (t (28) = 2.526, P = 0.017) with identifying correct acetabular fracture classification. Moreover, Likert scale score in the experimental group was also significantly higher than in the control group (Z = 2.477, P = 0.013). This 3D classification software has objectively and subjectively showed an advantage over the traditional 2D tutorial, resulting in an improved classification accuracy and higher Likert scale score. The 3D software has the potential to improve both clinical knowledge as well as identifying correct patient management in orthopedics.

An Analysis of Research Quality and Productivity at Six Academic Orthopaedic Residencies.

OBJECTIVE: It remains largely unknown what factors impact the research productivity of residency programs. We hypothesized that dedicated resident research time would not affect the quantity and quality of a program's peer-reviewed publication within orthopedic residencies. These findings may help programs improve structure their residency programs to maximize core competencies. DESIGN: Three hundred fifty-nine residents and 240 staff from six different US orthopedic residency programs were analyzed. All publications published by residents and faculty at each program from January 2007 to December 2015 were recorded. SCImago Journal Rankings (SJR) were found for each journal. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in publications by residents at each program (p > 0.05). Faculty with 10+ years of on staff, had significantly more publications than those with less than 10 years (p < 0.01). Programs with increased resident research time did not consistently produce publications with higher SJR than those without dedicated research time. CONCLUSIONS: Increased dedicated resident research time did not increase resident publication rates or lead to publications with higher SJR.

Effectiveness of synchronous vs asynchronous faculty aid in learning how to diagnose, plan and perform a 44C ankle fracture osteosynthesis in a synthetic bone model / Eficacia de la ayuda docente sincrónica frente a la asincrónica en el aprendizaje del diagnóstico, la planificación y el desempeño de una osteosíntesis de fractura de tobillo 44C en un modelo de hueso sintético

Abstract: Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted educational activities since 2020. AO Trauma Latin American courses took place in a blended modality during 2021 and participant's feedback was positive. In this study, we aim to identify if there was any difference in learning, planning, and executing an osteosynthesis on a bone model with synchronous or asynchronous faculty support during an online asynchronous learning program. Material and methods: we designed an online asynchronous course designed for teaching about trimalleolar ankle fractures. We randomized twenty participants into two groups: the control group had synchronous faculty support and the intervention group had asynchronous faculty support. Participants were evaluated with initial and final quizzes, preoperative planning, and execution of an osteosynthesis on a bone model. Comparisons of scores between CG and IG were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric variables. A two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: we did not find a significant difference between synchronous or asynchronous faculty support during our asynchronous learning program in quiz results, preoperative planning, global rating scale or the result of the osteosynthesis as compared to the preoperative plan. Conclusion: there appears to be no difference in participant learning with synchronous or asynchronous faculty support during an online, asynchronous course. Asynchronous activities appear to be effective teaching methods and should be considered in continuous medical education in orthopedics. Larger studies are needed to identify differences in participant learning outcomes between synchronous and asynchronous faculty support models.

Resumen: Introducción: la pandemia de COVID-19 ha interrumpido las actividades educativas desde 2020. Los cursos de AO Trauma Latinoamérica se realizaron en modalidad semipresencial durante 2021 y la retroalimentación de los participantes fue positiva. En este estudio, nuestro objetivo es identificar si hubo alguna diferencia en el aprendizaje, la planificación y la ejecución de una osteosíntesis en un modelo óseo con el apoyo sincrónico o asincrónico de la facultad durante un programa de aprendizaje asincrónico en línea. Material y métodos: diseñamos un curso asíncrono en línea para la enseñanza de las fracturas trimaleolares de tobillo. Se distribuyó aleatoriamente a 20 participantes en dos grupos: el grupo de control tuvo apoyo docente sincrónico y el grupo de intervención tuvo apoyo docente asincrónico. Se evaluó a los participantes con cuestionarios iniciales y finales, planificación preoperatoria y ejecución de una osteosíntesis en un modelo óseo. Las comparaciones de las puntuaciones entre GC e GI se realizaron mediante la prueba U de Mann-Whitney para variables no paramétricas. Una p de dos colas < 0.05 se consideró estadísticamente significativa. Resultados: no encontramos diferencia significativa entre el apoyo del profesorado síncrono o asíncrono durante nuestro programa de aprendizaje asíncrono en los resultados de los cuestionarios, la planificación preoperatoria, la escala de valoración global o el resultado de la osteosíntesis en comparación con el plan preoperatorio. Conclusión: no parece haber diferencias en el aprendizaje de los participantes con el apoyo sincrónico o asincrónico del profesorado durante un curso en línea asincrónico. Las actividades asíncronas parecen ser métodos de enseñanza eficaces y deberían tenerse en cuenta en la formación médica continua en ortopedia. Se necesitan estudios más amplios para identificar las diferencias en los resultados de aprendizaje de los participantes entre los modelos de apoyo docente síncrono y asíncrono.

A novel phased-concept course for the delivery of anatomy and orthopedics training in medical education.

Integration of anatomy and clinical teaching is a theoretical ideal, yet there is a worldwide paucity of such amalgamation. These teaching models provide support for medical trainees, an important element in Germany where orthopedic intern numbers have declined and anecdotal evidence suggests disinterest in orthopedics. The aim of the study was to develop an integrated anatomy-surgical course for undergraduate medical training, assess the model developed, and explore how medical students perceive orthopedics as a career. The course was to deliver medical anatomy and clinical orthopedic training, focusing on interdisciplinary teaching and learning, vertical integration of clinical knowledge and skills, and professional interaction. Survey evaluation of the course and students' perceptions of orthopedic careers was performed, including Likert-type responses rating variables of interest. A phased-concept program of five courses, each optional and under one-week in duration, was developed parallel to the undergraduate medical program. Delivered by anatomists and surgeons, courses included biomechanics, advanced dissection, surgical approaches, casts and implants, and sports medicine. Course data indicate positive support for course format, stimulation of interest, and high clinical relevance. Students are generally interested in surgery, and identify hierarchy, lawsuits, bureaucracy and physical stress as barriers to orthopedic careers. This novel phased-concept successfully delivers combined anatomy and surgery training in a vertically-integrated format while addressing students' clinical and professional skills. The format facilitates an appreciation of potential career options in orthopedics, while fostering professional skills during medical training. Barriers to careers in orthopedics can now be addressed in future courses. Anat Sci Educ 10: 372-382. © 2016 American Association of Anatomists.

Protected Resident Research Time Does Not Increase the Quantity or Quality of Residency Program Research Publications: A Comparison of 3 Orthopedic Residencies.

INTRODUCTION: The effect of dedicated resident research time in terms of residency program research productivity remains largely unknown. We hypothesize that the quantity and quality of a residency program's peer-reviewed publications (PRPs) increase proportionately with the amount of dedicated research time given to residents. METHODS: Three residency programs (P1, P2, and P3) were examined. P1 has a mandatory research year for all residents between postgraduate years 3 and 4. P2 has an elective research year for 1 resident between postgraduate years 2 and 3. P3 has no dedicated research time for residents. All publications produced by residents and staff at each program from January 2007 through December were recorded from PUBMED. SCImago Journal Rankings were used as a proxy to measure research quality. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the number of publications produced between the institutions on a per-staff (p = 0.27) and per-resident (p = 0.80) basis. There were no residents at P3 who graduated without at least 1 PRP, whereas there were 7 residents from P1 and 8 residents from P2 who graduated without a PRP. There were no significant differences between programs in terms of the SCImago Journal Ranking for the journals containing their publications (p = 0.135). DISCUSSION: Residency programs with dedicated research time did not produce significantly (p > 0.05) more, or higher quality, PRPs than residencies without dedicated research time. It may be that the quantity and quality of PRPs is related more to faculty engagement, research interest, and mentorship at individual programs rather than the number of residents given dedicated time to complete research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

The application of scenario-based training and medical simulator in the orthopedics education / 中华医学教育探索杂志

Objective To evaluate the application of scenario-based training and medical simulator in the orthopedics education. Methods A total of 60 students from Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine who finished their orthopedics internship from January 2016 to July 2016 were involved. They were randomly divided into the study group and control group with 30 students each. The study group re-ceived 2 classes of scenario-based training and medical simulator assisted education during their internship in the orthopedics department while the control group received 2 classes of traditional lessons instead. Sur-veys were conducted after the internship and the scores of internship were also recorded. Result The overall satisfaction was higher in the study group than the control group [(8.6±0.6) vs. (8.1±0.5), P=0.001]. On the part of learning interest, clinical thinking, clinical practice and group working, the study group also received better evaluation (P<0.05). The study group achieved better scores in the final examination than the control group [(84.4±2.6) vs. (82.5±3.4), P=0.018]. Conclusion The combination of scenario-based training and medical simulator can improve the ability of medical students in the orthopedics education, and receive higher satisfaction.