Burnout Syndrome among Otorhinolaryngologists during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background and Objectives: To determine the prevalence of burnout syndrome among otorhinolaryngologists in Lithuania and investigate associations with sociodemographic and professional factors during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: Burnout was measured using the validated Lithuanian version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Demographic characteristics and professional characteristics were collected utilizing an anonymous questionnaire. Results: Eighty otorhinolaryngologists (ORL group) and 30 information technology professionals (the control group) were enrolled in this study. A high level of professional burnout in at least one of the subscales was observed in 82.5% of the ORL group subjects. Depersonalization and burnout syndrome were more frequently detected with increasing age in the ORL group (r = 0.2, p < 0.04). Greater satisfaction with salary and working environment resulted in a lower burnout incidence (r = 0.31, p = 0.001). Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the incidence of burnout syndrome has been high among Lithuanian otorhinolaryngologists. Demographic and professional characteristics are significantly related to burnout syndrome among Lithuanian otorhinolaryngologists.

[Application of new technologies in postgraduate education of otorhinolaryngologists]. / Primenenie novykh tekhnologii v poslediplomnom obrazovanii vrachei-otorinolaringologov.

The article is devoted to one of the urgent problems of modern medical education - postgraduate education, further development of skills and deepening of knowledge among otorhinolaryngologists after training in clinical residency. The long-term experience of training in advanced training cycles for both otorhinolaryngologists beginning their professional path and doctors with a long, decades-long work experience in the specialty is analyzed. The trajectory of professional development is presented, which allows structuring the acquired knowledge, distributing the stages of training over time, taking into account the priorities of students and combining training with the exchange of experience and personal communication with colleagues. The problems and the most promising directions of the development of postgraduate education of otorhinolaryngologists are considered.

[The combination of recurrent otitis media and adenotomy in early childhood as diagnostic marker of mucopolysaccharidosis type II (Hunter syndrome)]. / Sochetanie retsidiviruyushchego srednego otita i adenotomii v rannem detskom vozraste kak diagnosticheskii marker mukopolisakharidoza II tipa (sindroma Khantera).

Mucopolysaccharidoses are a group of rare lysosomal accumulation diseases caused by a deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme and the accumulation of mucopolysaccharides in various organs and tissues. Children with mucopolysaccharidosis type II (Hunter syndrome) develop multisystem dysfunction, including severe airway obstruction. At the same time, 34% of patients already at an early age (2-3 years) undergo surgical manipulations related to ENT organs (tonsillectomy, adenotomy). The article describes a clinical case of diagnosis of type II mucopolysaccharidosis by a pediatric otorhinolaryngologist. The main manifestations of the disease are discussed in detail, including the presence of indications for adenotomy at the age of 2 years, episodes of otitis media, which served as diagnostic markers for suspected orphan disease mucopolysaccharidosis type II. The leading role of the pediatric otorhinolaryngologist in the early diagnosis of the rare disease mucopolysaccharidosis type II is substantiated.

Nasal Endoscopy in the Clinical Diagnosis of Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of nasal endoscopy for early clinical diagnosis of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) in children and to investigate the characteristics of epistaxis and mucocutaneous telangiectases in our pediatric population. STUDY DESIGN: From May 2016 to December 2019, a cross-sectional observational study was conducted, recruiting children aged 2-18 years with a parent affected by HHT. To identify the Curaçao criteria, all children underwent collection of clinical history, mucocutaneous examination, and nasal endoscopy. The clinical data were then compared with the genetic data acquired subsequently. RESULTS: Seventy children (median age, 10.8 years) were included. All underwent nasal endoscopy without complications. Forty-six children were positive by genetic testing; of these, 26 % had skin and oral telangiectases and 91 % had nasal telangiectases. The diagnostic sensitivity of the Curaçao criteria increased from 28 % (95 % CI, 16%-43 %) to 85 % (95 % CI, 71%-94 %; P < .0001) when the nasal telangiectases were included. CONCLUSIONS: The magnified and complete endoscopic view of the nasal cavities proved useful in increasing the diagnostic sensitivity of the Curaçao criteria. Such an examination turned out to be feasible and safe. For this reason, we believe that nasal endoscopy should be included in the diagnostic assessment of pediatric patients with suspected HHT.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux management in clinical practice.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is an inflammatory reaction of the mucosa of the pharynx, larynx, and other associated upper respiratory organs, caused by a reflux of stomach contents outside the esophagus. LPR is considered a relatively new clinical entity with a vast number of clinical manifestations that are sometimes treated empirically and without a correct diagnosis. Alginate is a reasonable therapeutic option as a first-line or add-on option. A survey included 35 Italian otorhinolaryngologists. The survey considered ten practical queries. LPR is a common disease in clinical practice. History and fiber-optic endoscopy constitute the main diagnostic tools. Alginates represent a frequent medication to treat LPR both as first-line and add-on. The mean effectiveness rate is 44% for first-line choice and 76% for the add-on. In conclusion, the current survey provided exciting information about the management of LPR in clinical practice.

A survey on chronic rhinosinusitis: opinions from experts of 50 countries.

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a very prevalent inflammatory disease. Treatments vary in different countries. In the present study, we explored the approaches of physicians in 50 countries. In this cross-sectional study, a rhinosinusitis survey (RSS) was completed by Honorary and Corresponding Members (otorhinolaryngologists) of the Italian Society of Rhinology. In 79.1 % of the 50 countries, the proportion of patients suffering from CRS was 15 %. Nasal symptoms were more intense in winter (46 % of countries), and spring and autumn (22 %). The most common symptoms were nasal obstruction (86 %), postnasal drip (82 %) and headache (52 %). The most common investigative modalities in the assessment of CRS are paranasal sinus CT, fiberoptic endoscopy, and anterior rhinoscopy. CRS patients were principally treated by otorhinolaryngologists (70 %). Medical treatments included nasal corticosteroids (90 %), nasal washes (68 %), and nasal decongestants (32 %). In 88 % of countries, more than 50 %, or "about 50 %", of all patients reported subjective symptom improvement after treatment. In most of the countries, surgery was required by 20-35 % of all CRS patients. During post-surgery follow-up, nasal washes (90 %), nasal corticosteroids (76 %), and systemic antibiotics (32 %) were prescribed. In 20-40 % of all patients, CRS was associated with nasal polyps. In such patients, the medical treatment options were nasal corticosteroids (90 %), systemic corticosteroids (50 %), nasal washes (46 %), and systemic antibiotics (34 %). Treatment of CRS patients varies in different countries. Paranasal sinus CT is the most common investigative modality in the assessment of CRS, and nasal corticosteroids are the first-line treatment, in the absence or presence of nasal polyps.

Why don't many ENT Surgeons Perform Facial Trauma Surgery.

Introduction: The facial bones are prone to severe injuries due to high exposure and the labile nature of the bones, and they are injured in a significant proportion of trauma patients. Varying from simple, common nasal fractures to communited fractures of the face, management of such injuries can be extremely challenging due to fact that these injuries involve a highly vascular zone with proximity to the airway. In spite of being very well trained in surgeries of face and head neck area, with the exception of nasal bones, not many ENT surgeons in India perform facial bone fracture surgeries. Objective: This questionnaire-based study was planned to explore this key issue to understand as why many ENT surgeons do not perform facial trauma surgeries. Method: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted over a period of 2 months Responses were obtained from ENT surgeons across various social groups on a Google Form-based questionnaire. The answers were collected and analysed. Result: A total of 240 valid responses were obtained. Most (56.7%) of the ENT surgeons had more than 15 years of practice. Around half (52%) of surgeons never did facial trauma surgery, and 65% of respondents replied that the main reason for their lack of involvement in facial trauma surgery was that they had no exposure to it during postgraduate training. The majority (65%) also wanted to enter this subspeciality if given a chance. Conclusion: To develop facial trauma management as a subspeciality in ENT, more and more ENT departments in medical colleges should include these surgeries as part of their training programmes. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-024-04604-z.

The Role of Otorhinolaryngological Manifestations of Mild Covid-19 Disease in Hilly Terrain: Lessons Learnt at a Secondary Care Hospital.

We conducted the study to find the prevalence of ENT symptoms amongst mild Covid-19 patients from the hilly region of North India and attempted to propose a solution to curb the spread of Covid-19 through early identification, isolation, and treatment. A retrospective, cross-sectional study at a secondary healthcare center in a hilly region of North India covered 423 mildly symptomatic Covid-19 patients from April 2020 to March 2022. These patients were telephonically contacted or called in person at the outpatient department to answer a preset questionnaire with various parameters such as age, gender, ENT symptoms, and time to recover. The data obtained were statistically analyzed. 207 out of 423 mild Covid-19 patients complained of different ENT symptoms. Cough was the most common ENT symptom and was reported by 162 patients. Dizziness was the least common ENT symptom and was reported by 9 patients. Recovery time for tinnitus was maximum (persistent till six months in 5 patients). A high index of suspicion for Covid-19 disease in patients with ENT symptoms must be practiced. As the Covid-19 restrictions are gradually relaxed, widespread community education for strict adherence to Covid-19 appropriate behaviour and sensitization of General Practitioners a well as Otorhinolaryngologists regarding the importance of ENT symptoms in mild Covid19 disease will play a pivotal role in the early identification, isolation, and treatment of mild Covid-19 disease, which eventually may curb the future waves.

Assessment of perception, attitude, and practice of primary care practitioners towards allergic rhinitis practice guidelines: Development and validation of a new questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Primary care practitioners (PCPs), being the front liners, play an important role in treating allergic rhinitis (AR). As there is no proper tool to assess their perception, attitude, and practice in utilizing the guidelines, we aimed to develop and validate a new questionnaire for such purpose. METHODS: The development phase consists of both literature and expert panel review. The validation phase consists of content validity, face validity, and construct validity. Cronbach's alpha was used to verify internal consistency. The development phase produced a questionnaire with 3 domains: perception, attitude, and practice consisting of 60 items (PAP-PCP questionnaire). Item response theory analysis for perception demonstrated the difficulty and discrimination values were acceptable except for 3 items. Exploratory factor analysis for attitude and practice domains showed the psychometric properties were good except for 3 items in practice domain. Experts judgement was used to decide on the final selection of questionnaire which consists of 59 items. RESULTS: The final validated questionnaire has 3 domains with 59 items. All domains had Cronbach's alpha above 0.65 which was reliable. 302 physicians completed the questionnaire. 98% PCPs diagnosed AR based on clinical history. Although, majority agree AR guidelines is useful (67%), they had difficulty in using it to classify AR (54.9%) and determine AR severity (73.9%). Oral anti-histamines (first and second generation) were the most prescribed (>75%) followed by intranasal corticosteroids (59%) and combined intranasal corticosteroid and oral anti-histamine (51%). Majority agreed that treatment efficacy (81.8%), adverse effects (83.8%), fear of adverse effects (73.5%), route of administration (69.4%), dosing frequency (72.5%), taste (64.6%) and cost (73.5%) affect treatment compliance. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed and validated questionnaire is a promising instrument in understanding the treatment gap in AR. Although further testing and refinement are needed, it provides an initial means for evaluating knowledge and understanding of PCPs in treating AR.

Correlation Between Clinical Diagnosis and Pathological Diagnosis in Laryngeal Lesions.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the degree of agreement between the clinical and the pathological diagnosis in patients undergoing laryngeal microsurgery due to epithelial or edematous lesions of the vocal folds. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective study. METHODS: The study was developed in the ear, nose, and throat clinic of a tertiary hospital, through chart review. We included all patients who underwent microsurgery of the larynx, whose videolaryngoscopic tests showed vocal fold lesions, from January 2003 to August 2014. During the study period, we identified 48 patients with epithelial and edematous lesions. The patients were divided into two groups. In group A, patients with edematous lesions with clinical diagnosis of polyps and Reinke edema were included. Group B comprised patients with epithelial lesions, as leukoplakic injuries. A correlation between histopathological findings and clinical hypothesis between these two groups of lesions was performed. RESULTS: In group B, there was agreement in 88.9% of cases between the clinical and pathological diagnosis. In group A, compatibility occurred in only 46.4% of cases. We observed a statistically significant difference between the compatibility of the clinical and pathological diagnosis just in edematous lesions (P = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: The study showed the limitation of the pathological examination on edematous laryngeal lesions. On the other hand, on the epithelial lesions, there was more agreement between those diagnosis.

Actualities of management of aural, nasal, and throat foreign bodies.

BACKGROUND: Foreign bodies (Fbs) in the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) are common presentations in healthcare settings worldwide. AIM: This study was carried out to review the modes of presentation, management, and outcome of inserted Fbs in our setting. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A 5-year retrospective study of cases of ENT Fbs managed at two referral hospitals in Abuja Nigeria. The analysis was done with Chi-square and Pearson correlation. RESULTS: Five hundred and ninety-four patients aged 0-75 years, M:F = 1.1 (295 vs. 299) were reviewed. Prevalence was predominantly among the under 5 s; 286/594 (P = 0.001). ENT Fbs were 356/594 (59.9%), 167/594 (28.1%) and 71/59 (12.0%), respectively. Cotton wool 133/356 (37.4%) and beads 75/356 (21.1%) constituted most aural Fbs. Beads 45/167 (27.0%) and grains/seed 37/167 (22.1%) were the most common nasal Fbs while fish bones 38/71 (53.5%) and piece of metals 12/71 (16.9%) were dominant in the throat. Most cases of aural and nasal Fbs were asymptomatic. Ear syringing was the most common method for removal of aural Fbs 216/594 (60.7%) and instrumentation under direct vision for nasal Fbs 153/167 (91.6%). Furthermore, 52/71 (73.2%) of throat Fbs were removed under general anesthesia. ENT complications observed included bruises, lacerations, perforations, Epistaxis, and a case of respiratory failure. Delayed presentation (beyond 24 h) was seen in 489/594 (82.3%) of cases while failed previous attempts by untrained hands constituted 353/594 (59.4%). A strong correlation between complications and duration of Fbs insertion (R (2) = 0.8759) was established. CONCLUSIONS: Fbs in ENT are common especially among children below 5 years. Majority presented beyond 24 h, and there was a strong correlation between duration of Fbs insertion and associated complications. Repeated failed attempts and delayed referrals to otorhinolaryngologists from peripheral centers were also contributing factors to increased morbidity and hence the need for awareness.

Role of ENT Surgeon in Managing Battle Trauma During Deployment.

With technological improvements in body armour and increasing use of improvised explosive devices, it is the injuries to head, face and neck are the cause for maximum fatalities as military personnel are surviving wounds that would have otherwise been fatal. The priorities of battlefield surgical treatment are to save life, eyesight and limbs and then to give the best functional and aesthetic outcome for other wounds. Modern day battlefields pose unique demands on the deployed surgical teams and management of head and neck wounds demands multispecialty approach. Optimal result will depend on teamwork of head and neck trauma management team, which should also include otolaryngologist. Data collected by various deployed HFN surgical teams is studied and quoted in the article to give factual figures. Otorhinolaryngology becomes a crucial sub-speciality in the care of the injured and military otorhinolaryngologists need to be trained and deployed accordingly. The otolaryngologist's clinical knowledge base and surgical domain allows the ENT surgeon to uniquely contribute in response to mass casualty incident. Military planners need to recognize the felt need and respond by deploying teams of specialist head and neck surgeons which should also include otorhinolaryngologists.

The Efficacy of Preoperative Routine Otorhinolaryngologic Referral Before Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy

PURPOSE: To determine if routine otorhinolaryngologic referral prior to endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) is necessary. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-seven eyes of 178 patients who were supposed to undergo EN-DCR were prospectively analyzed. Nasal endoscopy was performed by an ophthalmologist and the patients who had severe abnormality were referred to an otorhinolaryngologist. The patients were classified into 3 groups after a preoperative examination by an ophthalmologist and an otorhinolaryngologist; the number and success rate of each group were then investigated. Group A consisted of patients who had no nasal cavity abnormality, Group B consisted of patients with a nasal cavity abnormality but who received no treatment, and Group C consisted of patients who had a nasal cavity abnormality and received otorhinolaryngologic treatment. RESULTS: The number of subjects in each group was 156 in Group A (87.7%), 12 in Group B (6.7%), and 10 in Group C (5.6%). The number of patients who were referred to the otorhinolaryngologist was 22 (12.3%). There was no statistical significance of success rate between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Routine nasal endoscopic examination should be performed by an ophthalmologist prior to EN-DCR. Only patients with severe abnormal findings should be referred to an otorhinolaryngologist as the results from the present study show the percentage of patients having significant nasal abnormalities was found to be low (12%) and the success rate of EN-DCR revealed no statistical significance between the groups. This could help patients by saving time and expense.