Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy in non-cystic fibrosis lung transplant recipients: characteristics, efficacy and safety.

PURPOSE: Bacterial isolation is associated with worse outcomes after lung transplantation (LTx), and successful bacterial eradication is shown to improve long-term survival and pulmonary function. Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy (OPAT) may be an effective therapeutic modality for bacterial eradication post-LTx. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective analysis of OPAT characteristics, efficacy, safety, and costs in non-cystic fibrosis LTx recipients. RESULTS: A total of 156 OPAT courses (from June 2019 to December 2022) were evaluated in 108 distinct LTx recipients. OPAT mainly consisted of dual antibiotic therapy (69%) for pulmonary bacterial isolation (97%), mostly Pseudomonas aeruginosa (66%). Successful eradication at 3 months post-OPAT was achieved in 71%. Eradication rate was significantly higher in patients treated after the first post-operative year (79%), compared to patients within the first year (61%) (p = 0.017). Eradication rate was similar for multidrug resistance (eradication rate 61%) versus no multidrug resistance (74%) (p = 0.116). Spirometry remained stable at 90 days post-OPAT. A statistically significant, but clinically negligible, increase in serum creatinine at 90 days post-OPAT was observed (1.33 mg/dL vs. 1.39 mg/dL, p < 0.001), yet unrelated to the antibiotic regimen used. OPAT-related hospital admissions occurred in 13% and line-related adverse events in 6%. Median number of hospitalization days saved per OPAT-course was 10 days (range 2-92), accounting for a total of 1841 avoided admission days and an estimated net cost reduction of 47% per treatment course. CONCLUSION: OPAT is an effective and safe therapeutic modality for bacterial eradication post-LTx, associated with a significant reduction in hospitalization days and treatment costs.

Antibiotic-Induced Neutropenia in Patients Receiving Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Our research objective was to describe the incidence and management of antibiotic-induced neutropenia in patients receiving outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) at our institution over a 7-year period. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients followed by the OPAT clinic from 1 July 2016 to 30 March 2022 who developed antibiotic-induced neutropenia (defined as an absolute neutrophil count of ≤1.5 × 109/L). Patients receiving vancomycin in the OPAT clinic received weekly laboratory monitoring, while those receiving other antibiotics received laboratory monitoring at week 3 of therapy. Out of the 2,513 treatment courses, 55 cases of antibiotic-induced neutropenia were identified, resulting in an incidence of 2.2 cases per 100 treatment courses (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 2.9). Of the 45 cases for which a sole cause was identified, the three most common intravenous antibiotic culprits were vancomycin (21/541; 3.9%), ceftriaxone (10/490; 2.0%), and cloxacillin (2/103; 1.9%). Five (9.1%) patients had symptoms accompanying neutropenia that warranted hospital admission. There were no deaths, and all patients recovered their neutrophil count after antibiotic discontinuation or completion. In nine cases (16.3%), the culprit beta-lactam antibiotic was changed to another beta-lactam agent containing a structurally different side chain, with successful recovery of the neutrophil count in 9/9 (100%). The highest risk of antibiotic-induced neutropenia was associated with vancomycin, ceftriaxone, and cloxacillin in our cohort. With standardized outpatient monitoring during the third week of OPAT, cases of neutropenia can be detected early and managed without hospitalization. Data from our study also support the safety of switching to alternate beta-lactams with structurally different side chains.

Inpatient Antibiotic Costs Associated With Switching From Vancomycin to Daptomycin for Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy.

Purpose: The common practice of changing patients to daptomycin for outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) can increase inpatient daptomycin use and impact inpatient pharmacy expenses. The purpose of this study was to quantify the additional inpatient antibiotic expenditures associated with changing patients from vancomycin to daptomycin for OPAT. Methods: This study examined patients who were discharged from January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019. Patients were included if they were ≥18 years old, transitioned from vancomycin to daptomycin prior to discharge, and were cared for by the Infectious Diseases OPAT program. Patients switched to daptomycin for therapeutic reasons were excluded. A cost analysis evaluating the vancomycin regimen prior to changing to daptomycin and the daptomycin doses given prior to discharge and during readmissions for the first 6 weeks after discharge was performed using Wholesale Acquisition Costs. The primary outcome was the inpatient antibiotic expense associated with changing to daptomycin for OPAT. Results: Sixty-eight patients met study criteria. The mean number of inpatient doses of daptomycin administered prior to discharge was 4.3. Twelve patients were readmitted and received a mean of 5.3 additional doses. The estimated cost difference between the inpatient daptomycin doses and equivalent vancomycin therapy was $2647 per patient. Limiting patients to only 1 pre-discharge dose of daptomycin would reduce this cost difference to $926 per patient. Conclusion: Switching from vancomycin to daptomycin for OPAT can be associated with substantial inpatient pharmacy costs. These excessive costs can be mitigated if only 1 dose of daptomycin is given before discharge.

Providing community intravenous therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Community intravenous therapy is well-established in most regions of the UK. Although there are national good practice recommendations detailing the service provision of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT), examples of extended service delivery of other therapies are limited. This article describes the development of a community IV therapy service through integration with acute and primary care teams. IV therapies delivered in addition to antimicrobials safely outside of the hospital setting are also discussed with scope for future areas of development explored. The benefits of care closer to home for patients during the global COVID-19 pandemic are examined, as well as the potential for widening the whole gamut of practice for already established NHS community services through the development of integrated working in a local care organisation.

OPAT in Switzerland: single-center experience of a model to treat complicated infections.

PURPOSE: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) programmes are established in the minority of Swiss hospitals. We aimed to study the OPAT programme at the University Hospital Basel during a 3-year period to evaluate safety and outcome. METHODS: All patients treated in the OPAT programme between 2015 and 2017 were included in the study. Demographic, clinical and OPAT outcome data were extracted from the hospital information system. Differences between treatment periods were analysed and risk factors for readmission and adverse events identified. RESULTS: In total, 462 patients were enrolled from 2015 to 2017. Patient numbers and total treatment days increased by 68% and 116%, respectively. Indications included many complicated infections such as bone and joint (23%) and intravascular infections (13%). Of the identified Gram-negative bacteria, 25% produced extended spectrum beta-lactamases. The percentage of antibiotics administrated with an elastomeric device increased from 11% in 2015 to 29% in 2017, whereas the use of once-daily antimicrobials (such as ceftriaxone) declined. Adverse events were rare (n = 67; 14.6%) including only two severe catheter-related events. Cure was noted in 98% of patients. 30-day unplanned readmission occurred in 46 (10.0%) patients, and intravascular infections and a higher Charlson comorbidity index were identified as independent predictors. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the successful implementation of a formal OPAT programme in a Swiss tertiary care hospital. Careful selection of patients and monitoring during treatment are crucial to avoid frequent readmissions. Hence, our data call for an expansion of OPAT services in Switzerland in the near future.

Clinical effectiveness of flucloxacillin delivery using an elastomeric device for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.

There has been a surging interest in using elastomeric infusion devices to deliver outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), which is more cost-effective than standard antibiotic administration, which requires multiple daily home visits. This has been particularly important since the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic, because reducing patient contact can also help to minimise transmission of COVID-19 to outpatients who are at a high risk of COVID-19-triggered complications. In this retrospective study, the clinical effectiveness of intravenous (IV) infusion of flucloxacillin using an elastomeric device was explored in a convenience sample of patients. Patients with three primary infective diagnoses-bloodstream infection, non-vertebral osteomyelitis and vertebral osteomyelitis-were included in the analyses. In non-vertebral osteomyelitis patients, Accufuser antibiotic infusion shortened the course of OPAT care relative to standard antibiotic administration (p<.05). In contrast, in vertebral osteomyelitis patients, it prolonged the course of OPAT care relative to standard administration (p<.05). In patients with bloodstream infections, no significant difference was found between the treatment modes (p=.93). Thus, the clinical effectiveness of Accufuser antibiotic infusion varies among patients with different infective diagnoses, and there seems to be a complex relationship between the method of antibiotic delivery and the patient's condition.

Experience with setting up community intravenous therapy clinics.

The NHS Long Term Plan aims for patients to receive more options, better support and integrated care at the right time and in the optimal care setting. Community nursing teams at the Wirral Community Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust have experienced several challenges in delivering intravenous antibiotics (IV) to patients within their own homes, especially for non-housebound patients, due to the complexity of and demand on the service. Traditionally, intravenous antimicrobials are administered in the acute hospital or in-patient settings. However, there is now a growing trend to deliver intravenous antibiotic therapy within the community. Community nurses have a wealth of knowledge and skills that can support the delivery of the NHS Long Term Plan by developing new models of care in integrated care systems while supporting the implementation and delivery of the governments five-year action plan on antimicrobial resistance. This article describes how the community nursing service at Wirral Community Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust set up community IV clinics.

Sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with acceptance of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy in a Singapore tertiary hospital from 2014 to 2017.

Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) can facilitate early discharge; however, not all offered OPAT can accept. We assessed factors associated with acceptance of OPAT in a large Asian tertiary hospital cohort. From 2014 to 2017, we reviewed all referrals to Singapore General Hospital's (SGH) Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy (OPAT) service. We compared differences in sociodemographic and clinical factors between patients who opted for OPAT and those who declined, using chi-square test for univariate analysis and logistic regression for multivariate analysis. From 2014 to 2017, a total of 1406 OPAT referrals were made. Of these, 95.9% (1349/1406) were deemed suitable for OPAT. Amongst those suitable, 90.0% (1213/1349) accepted OPAT treatment. On multivariate analysis, being independently ambulant (aOR = 3.46, 95%CI = 2.21-5.37) was independently associated with higher odds of acceptance for OPAT; whereas, patients with peripheral vascular disease had lower odds of accepting OPAT (aOR = 0.32, 95%CI = 0.16-0.62). Lower socioeconomic status (SES) was closely associated with rejection of OPAT, with markers of both individual-level SES (subsidized ward class) and area-level SES (staying in a public rental flat) being independently associated with lower odds of OPAT preference. Distance and travel time were not associated with OPAT acceptance. The top reasons for rejecting OPAT were lack of caregiver (n = 35), mobility issues (n = 24), financial issues (n = 24), and difficulty caring for the line (n = 21). Comorbidities, mobility, and financial issues are important factors to consider when determining suitability for OPAT. More can be done to improve accessibility of OPAT amongst lower-income patients and those staying in lower-SES areas.

Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy in a suburban tertiary referral centre in Australia over 10 years.

PURPOSE: Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) is a widely accepted and safe therapeutic option for carefully selected patients. This study reviewed the practice of an OPAT service in a large Australian tertiary teaching hospital in Western Sydney over a 10-year period. METHOD: Data were retrieved from a prospectively maintained electronic database which included information on patient demographics, clinical diagnosis, microbiological identity, antimicrobial therapy, complications and readmissions. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: There were 3435 referrals made to the service between January 2004 and June 2014, amounting to 25,289 antibiotic days. The most frequent referral was for Skin and Soft Tissue Infections (SSTIs), 61.28%, followed by Bone and Joint Infections (BJIs), 15.30%. The most common organism identified was methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Readmission was uncommon (5.15%), with the highest rate of readmission noted for Cardiovascular System Infections (16.67%) followed by BJIs (10.31%). Line infection, aseptic thrombophlebitis and drug hypersensitivity or reaction were the cause of 68.55% of all complications. There was a decline in line-related complications throughout the study period. CONCLUSION: OPAT service is in increasing demand in Australia, providing a significant relief in in-hospital days. Growth in referrals was seen not only with SSTIs and BJIs, but also a diverse range of other infective entities with limited literature in its treatment in an OPAT setting. This study highlights the need to improve data collection, develop risk stratification strategies and standardisation of OPAT services in Australia.

The utility of a blood culture database to identify patients suitable for outpatient parenteral antibiotic treatment.

BACKGROUND: The clinical and cost-effectiveness of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) services are well described. We used a blood culture database as a novel approach to case finding and determined its utility in identifying inpatients suitable for OPAT. METHODS: From December 2012 to November 2013, consecutive adult inpatients with bacteraemia, and those recruited to OPAT, were prospectively studied. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to investigate the association between bacteraemic patient characteristics and OPAT recruitment. RESULTS: There were 470 bacteraemic and 134 OPAT patients. The blood culture database identified 22 (16.4%; CI 10.5 to 23.6) additional patients suitable for OPAT, 4.7% (95% CI 3.0% to 7.0%) of the total bacteraemic cohort. 20 (90.9%) of these patients had community-acquired bacteraemia. Bacteraemic patients with urinary tract infections (UTIs), 11/157 (7.0%; 95% CI 3.5% to 12.2%) were most commonly recruited to OPAT and Escherichia coli was the most common blood culture isolate. In the E. coli bacteraemic subgroup, extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) producers were significantly higher in the OPAT group, compared with the non-OPAT group, 9/11 (81.8%) vs 17/192 (8.9%), p<0.001. Among OPAT patients, there were no deaths within 30 days and no significant difference in relapse rates between bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic patients, 1/22 (4.6%) vs 5/112 (4.5%). In logistic regression analysis, there were no patient characteristics in the bacteraemic cohort that predicted recruitment to OPAT. In a subgroup analysis of patients with Gram-negative bacteraemia, ESBL production was strongly associated with OPAT recruitment, OR 5.85 (95% CI 1.94 to 17.58), p=0.002. CONCLUSIONS: A blood culture database proved a useful adjuvant to a clinical referral system, particularly for patients with community onset, multidrug resistant UTIs caused by ESBL producing E. coli. All bacteraemic patients recruited to OPAT received treatment safely and had good clinical outcomes.

Optimising patient safety when using elastomeric pumps to administer outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy.

Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) is a growing area of practice that has numerous benefits for both patients and the healthcare system. In order for OPAT services to be successful, strategies need to be in place to maximise efficiency while providing safe, high-quality care. The use of elastomeric pumps to deliver intravenous (IV) antibiotics can have many benefits for OPAT services; they are cost-effective, easy to use and allow the patient to be fully ambulant. However, plans need to be put in place to make sure their use is safe and effective. This article discusses the use of elastomeric pumps by a UK-based OPAT team and the governance processes the team put in place to optimise patient safety when using elastomeric pumps to deliver IV antibiotics. Furthermore, with experience of using elastomeric pumps for more than 4 years the OPAT team was asked to evaluate an elastomeric pump new to the UK market: the Accufuser pump (Vygon (UK) Limited). By collecting data on its use it was found to be safe and easy to use. The team felt that the Accufuser pump ran to time in 96% of completed evaluations and considered it to be clinically acceptable in all responses.

Patient retention of training in self-administration of intravenous antibiotic therapy in an outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy service.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To assess patient retention of initial training on completion of self-administration of a prolonged course of intravenous therapy. BACKGROUND: Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy is being used increasingly in the UK, and patients requiring prolonged antibiotic courses may be trained to self-administer therapy. DESIGN: Prospective clinical evaluation. METHODS: Patients self-administering parenteral antibiotic therapy through the Sheffield outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy service were assessed when nearing completion of therapy for correct technique in five key areas of proficiency using a scoring system. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients and nine carers were reassessed, at a median interval of 35 days after completion of the initial training package. Of these, 35 of 38 were fully competent in all areas. Three patients showed incomplete retention of their initial training. All made errors relating to use of sterile technique. CONCLUSIONS: Overall retention of training was excellent, and this supports earlier reports that patient-administered outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy is as safe as nurse-administered therapy. However, this study highlighted a small number of patients or carers who were not fully competent at maintaining sterile technique, and as a result, the protocol for training patients has been altered. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: In this study, we assess patients' ability to maintain safe self-administration of therapy over a period of time. Patients are increasingly involved and engaged in their own health care, and this study provides a novel approach to assessing their competence in practical procedures.

Making the EHR Work for You-Modifications of an Electronic Health Record System to Improve Tracking and Management of Patients Receiving Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy.

Background: Managing the complex needs of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) patients is challenging and time-consuming. We describe development of multimodal interventions to facilitate patient management within an Epic® (Epic Systems Corporation)-based electronic health record (EHR) platform. Methods: During 2016-2018, a multidisciplinary team created several modifications in our local EHR to improve gaps in OPAT care, including shared note templates, shared patient lists, automatically triggered notifications, and comprehensive order sets. A SmartForm was created, allowing collection of discrete, self-contained extractable data about each OPAT episode. We reviewed OPAT episodes from January 2019 through December 2022. Results: The multimodal EHR interventions culminated in the creation of a patient report, the "OPAT Monitoring View" collating OPAT-relevant data from multiple sections of the chart onto 1 screen display. This view is accessible both within the patient chart and from multiple list-based, in-basket, and snapshot-anchored preview functions in the EHR. Implementation of the EHR bundle facilitated management of 3402 OPAT episodes from 2019 to 2022 (850 episodes/year), about 50% higher than anticipated based on 540 OPAT courses in 2016. The OPAT EHR bundle allowed efficient (<3 hours) multidisciplinary rounds for management of 130-145 patients each week, streamlining of care transitions, and increasing staff satisfaction. Conclusions: Bundled multimodal modifications to the local EHR increased patient care efficiency and staff satisfaction and facilitated data collection to support a large OPAT program. These modifications apply commonly available EHR functionalities to OPAT care and could be adapted to other settings with different EHR platforms.

Outcomes of Ceftriaxone Compared With Cefazolin or Nafcillin/Oxacillin for Outpatient Therapy for Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections: Results From a Large United States Claims Database.

Background: Ceftriaxone is a convenient option for methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), but population-based studies for its effectiveness are lacking. Methods: In this retrospective cohort, a large insurance claims database was queried from 2010 to 2018 for adults with MSSA bloodstream infection (BSI). Patients discharged on OPAT on cefazolin or oxacillin/nafcillin were compared with ceftriaxone with respect to 90-day hospital readmission with the same infection category and 90-day all-cause readmission using logistic regression models. Results: Of 1895 patients with MSSA BSI, 1435 (75.7%) patients received cefazolin, oxacillin, or nafcillin and 460 (24.3%) ceftriaxone. Readmission due to the same infection category occurred in 366 (19.3%), and all-cause readmission occurred in 535 (28.3%) within 90 days. Risk factors significantly associated with readmission with the same infection category were the oldest sampled age group (61-64 years: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.47 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.01-2.14]), intensive care unit stay during index admission (aOR, 2.33 [95% CI, 1.81-3.01]), prosthetic joint infection (aOR, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.18-2.23]), central line-associated BSI (aOR, 1.72 [95% CI, 1.33-2.94]), and endocarditis (aOR, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.18-2.23]). Ceftriaxone was not associated with increased risk of readmission with the same infection category (aOR, 0.89 [95% CI, .67-1.18]), or 90-day all-cause readmission (aOR, 0.86 [95% CI, .66-1.10]) when compared with oxacillin/nafcillin/cefazolin. Conclusions: In this cohort of MSSA BSI patients discharged on OPAT, there were no differences in outcomes of readmission with the same infection and 90-day all-cause readmission in patients treated with ceftriaxone compared to oxacillin/nafcillin or cefazolin. Patients with complicated BSIs such as endocarditis and epidural abscess were more likely to be prescribed cefazolin or oxacillin/nafcillin.

Predictors of adverse safety events and unscheduled care among an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) patient cohort.

Background: Select circumstances require outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). The potency of OPAT agents presents an increased risk of adverse events and unscheduled medical care. We analyzed these outcomes among OPAT recipients as part of the implementation of a collaborative OPAT program. Methods: Adult patients discharged home from an academic hospital with OPAT between January 2019 and June 2021 were included in this retrospective cohort; participants discharged between June 2020 and June 2021 were part of the collaborative OPAT program. Patients with cystic fibrosis were excluded. Data on patient characteristics and outcomes were collected from electronic medical records by two reviewers. Multivariable analysis was conducted to identify predictors of vascular access device (VAD) complications, adverse drug events (ADEs), and OPAT-related emergency department (ED) visits and rehospitalizations. Results: Among 265 patients included in the cohort, 57 (21.5%) patients experienced a VAD complication; obesity [odds ratio (OR): 3.32; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38-8.73; p = 0.01) and multi-drug therapy (OR: 2.56; 95% CI: 1.21-5.39; p = 0.01) were associated with an increased odds of VAD complication. Eighty-two (30.9%) participants experienced an ADE; 30 (11.3%) experienced a severe/serious ADE. Lipo/glycopeptide receipt, (OR: 5.28; 95% CI: 1.89-15.43; p < 0.01) and Black/African American race (OR: 4.85; 95% (CI): 1.56-15.45; p < 0.01) were associated with an increased odds of severe/serious ADE. Inclusion in the OPAT collaborative was associated with a decreased odds of severe/serious ADE (OR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.08-0.77; p = 0.01). Fifty-eight (21.9%) patients experienced an OPAT-related ED visit and 53 (20.0%) experienced an OPAT-related rehospitalization. VAD complication (OR: 2.37; 95% (CI): 1.15-4.86, p = 0.02) and ADEs (OR: 2.19; CI: 1.13-4.22; p = 0.02) were associated with OPAT-related ED visits. ADE was associated with 90-day OPAT-related rehospitalization (OR: 3.21; (CI): 1.59-6.58; p < 0.01). Conclusion: Adverse safety events and OPAT-related unscheduled care occurred often in our cohort. A structured OPAT program that includes ID pharmacist antibiotic reconciliation may reduce rates of ADEs.

Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy in Older Adults.

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) for older adults is a complex process that involves multiple stakeholders and care coordination, but it is a useful and patient-centered tool with opportunities for the treatment of complicated infections, improved patient satisfaction, and reduced health-care costs. Older age should not be an exclusion for OPAT but rather prompt the OPAT provider to thoroughly evaluate candidacy and safety. Amid the on-going COVID-19 pandemic, innovations in OPAT are needed to shepherd OPAT care into a more patient-centered, thoughtful practice, whereas minimizing harm to older patients from unnecessary health-care exposure and thus health-care associated infections.

What is the role of the clinical microbiology laboratory in the care of diagnostically challenging OPAT patients? Illustrative cases and literature review.

Optimal care of patients requiring long-term outpatient parenteral or oral antimicrobial therapy by infectious diseases (ID) specialists is facilitated by an accurate microbiologic diagnosis. Close collaboration between ID specialists and the clinical microbiology laboratory for routine or specialized molecular testing can result in more accurate diagnoses, streamlined antimicrobial regimens, and improved patient outcomes.

A cost minimisation analysis comparing oral linezolid and intravenous daptomycin administered via an outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy programme in patients requiring prolonged antibiotic courses.

This study is an economic analysis seeking to examine cost savings that may be accrued from usage of oral linezolid in place of OPAT IV daptomycin in patients requiring prolonged courses of IV or highly bioavailable oral antibiotic therapy. In order to do so we conducted a literature review to establish the scenarios in which the agents could be considered equivalent. We then, using a decision-tree model, conducted a cost analysis to establish differences in cost between the approaches. Under the model base-case, the total cost of treatment with OPAT daptomycin was €3,496.84 and the total cost of treatment with oral linezolid was €772.01. Therefore the oral linezolid strategy would be projected to save the Irish health service €2,724.83 per patient. These results were robust to one-way deterministic sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Our study suggests that significant savings could be safely accrued in the management of these patients.

Oral linezolid is as effective as IV (intravenous) daptomycin in appropriate treatment scenariosCost minimisation analysis deems oral linezolid substantially cheaper than IV daptomycinIn the base case, treatment with oral linezolid would save €2,724.83 per patient treatedFindings were robust to one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

Current Status of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy in Korea: Experience of a Single University-Affiliated Acute-Care Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Systematic protocols for the management of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) and information on the current status of a prescription of parenteral antibiotics for outpatients and referred patients are lacking in the Korea. This study aimed to describe the current status of OPAT at a tertiary care hospital in Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of outpatients and referral patients who were prescribed parenteral antibiotics from July to December 2019. We reviewed the prescribed antimicrobials, indications for antimicrobial therapy, institution administering the antimicrobial injections, and pre- and post-prescription management. RESULTS: Of the 577 prescriptions assessed in this study, 399 (69.2%) and 178 (30.8%) were delivered using the referral and outpatient models, respectively. About 70% of OPATs were prescribed in the pulmonology, infectious diseases, orthopedics, gastroenterology, and hematology departments. Five antibiotics (ertapenem [26.0%], ceftriaxone [12.8%], kanamycin [11.8%], amikacin [10.1%], and cefazolin [8.5%]) accounted for 69.2% of the total OPATs. Urinary tract (27.3%), respiratory (20.8%), and intra-abdominal (15.9%) infections were the most frequent indications for OPAT. After prescription, there were 295 (73.9%) and 150 (84.3%) follow-up visits in the referral and outpatient models, respectively (P <0.05). Laboratory tests necessary for monitoring were fully performed for 274 (47.5%) prescriptions. CONCLUSION: We found that a significant number of OPATs were prescribed, follow-up visits were not performed in the case of about a quarter of prescriptions, and laboratory monitoring was not fully conducted in more than half of the cases. Therefore, it is necessary to establish an appropriate management program for OPAT. Considering the limited resources and the distribution of OPAT prescriptions, an effective strategy may be to select the frequently-used antibiotics or frequently-prescribing departments and start the program with them.