Hyperkalemia treatment standard.

Hyperkalemia is a common electrolyte disturbance in both inpatient and outpatient clinical practice. The severity and associated risk depends on the underlying cause and rate of potassium (K+) increase. Acute hyperkalemia requires immediate attention due to potentially life-threatening manifestations resulting from the rapid increase in plasma K+ concentration. Treatment is initially focused on stabilizing the cardiac membrane, followed by maneuvers to shift K+ into the cells, and ultimately initiating strategies to decrease total body K+ content. Chronic hyperkalemia develops over a more extended period of time and manifestations tend to be less severe. Nevertheless, the disorder is not benign since chronic hyperkalemia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The approach to patients with chronic hyperkalemia begins with a review of medications potentially responsible for the disorder, ensuring effective diuretic therapy and correcting metabolic acidosis if present. The practice of restricting foods high in K+ to manage hyperkalemia is being reassessed since the evidence supporting the effectiveness of this strategy is lacking. Rather, dietary restriction should be more nuanced, focusing on reducing the intake of nonplant sources of K+. Down-titration and/or discontinuation of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors should be discouraged since these drugs improve outcomes in patients with heart failure and proteinuric kidney disease. In addition to other conservative measures, K+ binding drugs and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors can assist in maintaining the use of these drugs.

Hyperkalaemia in Cardiological Patients: New Solutions for an Old Problem.

Hyperkalaemia is one of the most common electrolyte disorders in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). The true burden of hyperkalaemia in the real-world setting can be difficult to assess, but in population-based cohort studies up to 4 in 10 patients developed hyperkalaemia. In addition to drugs interfering with potassium metabolism and food intake, several conditions can cause or worsen hyperkalaemia, such as advanced age, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. Mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, and hospitalisation are higher in patients with hyperkalaemia. Hyperkalaemia represents a major contraindication or a withholding cause for disease-modifying therapies like renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors (RAASi), mainly mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Hyperkalaemia can be also classified as acute and chronic, according to the onset. Acute hyperkalaemia is often a life-threatening emergency requiring immediate treatment to avoid lethal arrhythmias. Therapy goal is cell membrane stabilisation by calcium administration, cellular intake, shift of extracellular potassium to the intracellular space (insulin, beta-adrenergic agents, sodium bicarbonate), and increased elimination with diuretics or dialysis. Chronic hyperkalaemia was often managed with dietary counselling to prevent potassium-rich food intake and tapering of potassium-increasing drugs, mostly RAASi. Sodium polystyrene sulphonate, a potassium binder, was the only therapeutic option. Recently, new drugs such as patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate give new opportunities for the treatment of hyperkalaemia, as they proved to be safe, well tolerated, and effective. Aim of this review is to describe the burden of hyperkalaemia in cardiovascular patients, its direct and indirect effects, and the therapeutic options now available in the acute and chronic setting.

Patiromer Treatment in Patients With CKD, Hyperkalemia, and Hyperphosphatemia: A Post Hoc Analysis of 3 Clinical Trials.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), hyperkalemia (serum potassium [sK+]>5.0 mEq/L), and hyperphosphatemia experience poor clinical outcomes. Patiromer, a potassium binder that uses calcium as the exchange ion, may also reduce serum phosphorus (sP). We characterized the effect of patiromer on sP in patients with CKD, hyperkalemia, and hyperphosphatemia. STUDY DESIGN: A post hoc pooled analysis of individual-level data from the AMETHYST-DN, OPAL-HK, and TOURMALINE trials of patiromer. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients with CKD and hyperkalemia. EXPOSURE: Patients treated with patiromer (8.4-33.6 g/day). OUTCOME: Mean changes from baseline in sP, sK+, serum calcium (sCa2+), and serum magnesium (sMg2+) after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Descriptive statistics to summarize pooled data on the study outcomes from the 3 studies. RESULTS: We included 578 patients in the analysis. Of these participants, 86 patients (14.9%) had baseline hyperphosphatemia of whom 75.6% (65 of 86) had CKD stage 4/5 and 31.1% (153 of 492) with sP≤4.5mg/dL had CKD stage 4/5. Among the patients with elevated sP and sK+at baseline, the mean±SD reduction in sP and sK+after 4 weeks of patiromer treatment was-0.62±1.09mg/dL and-0.71± 0.51 mEq/L, respectively. Additionally, the mean±SD reduction in sMg2+in these patients was -0.25±0.23mg/dL while sCa2+remained unchanged. Both sMg2+and sCa2+remained within the normal range. Patiromer was generally well tolerated, and no serious adverse events were considered related to patiromer. LIMITATIONS: These were post hoc analyses, no placebo comparison was performed due to the design of the original studies, and the follow-up period was limited to 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in sP and sK+to the normal range were observed after 2 weeks of patiromer treatment, and the reduction was sustained during 4 weeks of treatment among patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD, hyperkalemia, and hyperphosphatemia. Future controlled trials are needed to establish if patiromer is useful to reduce both sK+and sP in hyperkalemic patients with CKD and hyperphosphatemia.

Maintaining Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitor Treatment with Patiromer in Hyperkalaemic Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: Comparison of a Propensity-Matched Real-World Population with AMETHYST-DN.

INTRODUCTION: Guideline-directed renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) therapy is rarely achieved in clinical settings, often due to hyperkalaemia. We assessed the potassium binder, patiromer, on continuation of RAASi therapy in hyperkalaemic patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the AMETHYST-DN trial, propensity score-matched to a real-world cohort not receiving patiromer (Salford Kidney Study). METHODS: The phase 2, open-label AMETHYST-DN trial (NCT01371747) randomized 304 adults with CKD on RAASi, T2DM, hyperkalaemia (serum potassium [sK+] >5.0 mEq/L), and hypertension to receive patiromer, 8.4-33.6 g/day for 12 months. Patients underwent propensity score matching for systolic blood pressure (BP), heart failure status, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), with 321 patients with CKD, T2DM, hyperkalaemia, and on RAASi from a prospective CKD cohort (Salford Kidney Study). Changes in RAASi utilization, sK+, BP, proteinuria, and eGFR during 12-month follow-up were assessed by Mann-Whitney U or χ2 tests. RESULTS: Matching produced 135:135 patients with no significant differences in age, sex, systolic BP, sK+, eGFR, or heart failure status, although differences in diastolic BP remained (p < 0.001). After 12 months, 100% of AMETHYST-DN patients receiving patiromer remained on RAASi therapy, whereas 38.5% of the Salford Kidney Cohort discontinued RAASi (p < 0.001); hyperkalaemia contributed in 16% of patients (42% of RAASi discontinuations). Significantly greater reductions in sK+ and BP, but not proteinuria or eGFR, were observed in AMETHYST-DN, compared with Salford Kidney Study patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the benefit of patiromer for sK+ management to enable RAASi use while revealing beneficial effects on BP.

Steroidal or non-steroidal MRAs: should we still enable RAASi use through K binders?

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are important interventions to improve outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease and heart failure, but their use is limited in some patients by the development of hyperkalemia. The risk of hyperkalemia may differ between agents, with one trial showing lower risk of hyperkalemia with the novel non-steroidal MRA finerenone compared with steroidal MRA spironolactone. Novel potassium binders, including patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, are available interventions to manage hyperkalemia and enable continuation of RAASi and MRAs in patients who could benefit from these treatments. These agents bind free potassium ions in the lumen of the gastrointestinal tract to prevent the absorption of dietary potassium and increase potassium secretion. Several studies showed that potassium binders are effective compared with placebo for preventing hyperkalemia or steroidal MRA discontinuation, but none has evaluated whether this strategy impacts clinically important endpoints such as cardiovascular events. Due to this and other limitations related to cost, clinical availability, pill burden and patient selection, alternative potential strategies to mitigate hyperkalemia may be more practical. Conservative strategies include increased monitoring and use of loop or thiazide diuretics to increase urinary potassium excretion. Non-steroidal MRAs may have a lower risk of hyperkalemia than steroidal MRAs and have stronger anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic effects with resultant reduced risk of kidney disease progression. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors also decrease hyperkalemia risk in patients on MRAs and decrease cardiovascular events and kidney disease progression. These may be better first-line interventions to obviate the need for potassium binders and offer additional benefits.

Effectiveness of Patiromer Versus Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate for the Management of Acute Hyperkalemia.

BACKGROUND: Patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) are 2 oral potassium binders approved for chronic hyperkalemia. It is unknown if one is more effective at reducing serum potassium than the other in acute hyperkalemia. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine if there was a difference between patiromer and SZC in the reduction of serum potassium in patients with acute hyperkalemia. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. Patients with a nonhemolyzed serum potassium level of 5.5 mEq/L or greater and received at least one dose of patiromer or SZC were included. The primary outcome was to determine the difference in effectiveness between patiromer and SZC in lowering of serum potassium 6 to 24 hours after administration. Secondary outcomes included description of total dosage received in 24 hours and incidence of electrolyte changes. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were included in this study, with 100 patients in each group. Serum potassium was significantly reduced by both patiromer (-1.2 mEq/L, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.3 to -0.2) and SZC (-0.8 mEq/L, 95% CI: -1.0 to -0.7), but there was no difference between the 2 medications in the amount of potassium reduction (P = 0.464). No clinically significant differences in electrolyte changes were seen. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study represents the first head-to-head comparison of patiromer and SZC in the setting of acute hyperkalemia. No difference in effectiveness between patiromer and SZC in reducing serum potassium was seen. Both agents can be considered in acute hyperkalemia management.

The Efficacy and Safety of Patiromer for Heart Failure Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of patiromer, a novel potassium binder, in reducing the risk of hyperkalemia in patients with heart failure and optimizing their RAASi therapy. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analyses. METHOD: The authors conducted a systematic search in Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy and safety of patiromer in heart failure patients from inception to 31 January 2023 and updated on 25 March 2023. The primary outcome was the association between the reduction of hyperkalemia and patiromer compared with placebo, and the secondary outcome was the association between optimization of RAASi therapy and patiromer. RESULTS: A total of four randomized controlled trials (n = 1163) were included in the study. Patiromer was able to reduce the risk of hyperkalemia in heart failure patients by 44% (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.87; I2 = 61.9%), improve tolerance to target doses of MRA in patients with heart failure (RR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.30; I2 = 49.4%), and decrease the proportion of all-cause discontinuation of RAASi (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.98; I2 = 48.4%). However, patiromer therapy was associated with an increased risk of hypokalemia (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.12; I2 = 0%), while no other statistically significant adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: Patiromer appears to have a considerable effect on reducing the incidence of hyperkalemia in heart failure patients and on optimizing the therapy of RAASi in those patients.

Therapeutic update on oral potassium exchange resin use in chronic kidney disease patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials.

Hyperkalemia is a common electrolyte disorder in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) that increases in prevalence with the decline of glomerular fltration rate (GFR). Another risk of hyperkalemia is the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) and/or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in managing CKD and proteinuria. The treatment of chronic hyperkalemia is challenging especially for outpatients. Treatment options for hyperkalemia include the potassium exchange resins of which two new potassium binders, Patiromer Sorbitex Calcium, and Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate (SZC) have demonstrated their clinical efficacy in reducing serum potassium with a positive safety profile. The old potassium exchange resin sodium polystyrene sulfonate (Kayexalate™) has some negative side effects including colonic necrosis, hypomagnesemia, and hypernatremia. In this review and literature search, we compare the available oral potassium exchange resins, highlight their advantages and disadvantages and comment on efficacy and safety parameters specifically in CKD patients.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of patiromer in the UK: evaluation of hyperkalaemia treatment and lifelong RAASi maintenance in chronic kidney disease patients with and without heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with and without heart failure (HF) often present with hyperkalaemia (HK) leading to increased risk of hospitalisations, cardiovascular related events and cardiovascular-related mortality. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) therapy, the mainstay treatment in CKD management, provides significant cardiovascular and renal protection. Nevertheless, its use in the clinic is often suboptimal and treatment is frequently discontinued due to its association with HK. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of patiromer, a treatment known to reduce potassium levels and increase cardiorenal protection in patients receiving RAASi, in the UK healthcare setting. METHODS: A Markov cohort model was generated to assess the pharmacoeconomic impact of patiromer treatment in regulating HK in patients with advanced CKD with and without HF. The model was generated to predict the natural history of both CKD and HF and quantify the costs and clinical benefits associated with the use of patiromer for HK management from a healthcare payer's perspective in the UK. RESULTS: Economic evaluation of patiromer use compared to standard of care (SoC) resulted in increased discounted life years (8.93 versus 8.67) and increased discounted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (6.36 versus 6.16). Furthermore, patiromer use resulted in incremental discounted cost of £2,973 per patient and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £14,816 per QALY gained. On average, patients remained on patiromer therapy for 7.7 months, and treatment associated with a decrease in overall clinical event incidence and delayed CKD progression. Compared to SoC, patiromer use resulted in 218 fewer HK events per 1,000 patients, when evaluating potassium levels at the 5.5-6 mmol/l; 165 fewer RAASi discontinuation episodes; and 64 fewer RAASi down-titration episodes. In the UK, patiromer treatment was predicted to have a 94.5% and 100% chance of cost-effectiveness at willingness-to-pay thresholds (WTP) of £20,000/QALY and £30,000/QALY, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the value of both HK normalisation and RAASi maintenance in CKD patients with and without HF. Results support the guidelines which recommend HK treatment, e.g., patiromer, as a strategy to enable the continuation of RAASi therapy and improve clinical outcomes in CKD patients with and without HF.

A randomized study to compare oral potassium binders in the treatment of acute hyperkalemia.

BACKGROUND: The KBindER (K+ Binders in Emergency Room and hospitalized patients) clinical trial is the first head-to-head evaluation of oral potassium binders (cation-exchange resins) for acute hyperkalemia therapy. METHODS: Emergency room and hospitalized patients with a blood potassium level ≥ 5.5 mEq/L are randomized to one of four study groups: potassium binder drug (sodium polystyrene sulfonate, patiromer, or sodium zirconium cyclosilicate) or nonspecific laxative (polyethylene glycol). Exclusion criteria include recent bowel surgery, ileus, diabetic ketoacidosis, or anticipated dialysis treatment within 4 h of treatment drug. Primary endpoints include change in potassium level at 2 and 4 h after treatment drug. Length of hospital stay, next-morning potassium level, gastrointestinal side effects and palatability will also be analyzed. We are aiming for a final cohort of 80 patients with complete data endpoints (20 per group) for comparative statistics including multivariate adjustment for kidney function, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, metabolic acidosis, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor prescription, and treatment with other agents to lower potassium (insulin, albuterol, loop diuretics). DISCUSSION: The findings from our study will inform decision-making guidelines on the role of oral potassium binders in the treatment of acute hyperkalemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04585542 . Registered 14 October 2020.

In pursuit of balance: renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and hyperkalaemia treatment.

Hyperkalaemia is a life-threatening condition leading to significant morbidity and mortality. It is common in heart failure (HF) patients due to the disease itself, which often co-exists with chronic kidney disease and diabetes mellitus, the fluctuations in renal function, and the use of some drugs [i.e. renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors]. In particular, hyperkalaemia opposes to their administration or up-titration, thus impacting on mortality. New K+ binders, namely, patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, are an intriguing option to manage hyperkalaemia in HF patients, both to reduce its fatal effects and to let clinicians up-titrate RAAS inhibitors. Even if their real impact on strong outcomes is still to be determined, we hereby provide an overview of hyperkalaemia in HF and its current management. New trials are welcome to fill the gap in knowledge.

Patiromer for the management of hyperkalemia in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the DIAMOND trial.

AIMS: To investigate the impact of patiromer on the serum potassium level and its ability to enable specified target doses of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) use in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 1642 patients with HFrEF and current or a history of RAASi-related hyperkalemia were screened and 1195 were enrolled in the run-in phase with patiromer and optimization of the RAASi therapy [≥50% recommended dose of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, and 50 mg of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) spironolactone or eplerenone]. Specified target doses of the RAASi therapy were achieved in 878 (84.6%) patients; 439 were randomized to patiromer and 439 to placebo. All patients, physicians, and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was between-group difference in the adjusted mean change in serum potassium. Five hierarchical secondary endpoints were assessed. At the end of treatment, the median (interquartile range) duration of follow-up was 27 (13-43) weeks, the adjusted mean change in potassium was +0.03 mmol/l in the patiromer group and +0.13 mmol/l in the placebo group [difference in the adjusted mean change between patiromer and placebo: -0.10 mmol/l (95% confidence interval, CI -0.13, 0.07); P < 0.001]. Risk of hyperkalemia >5.5 mmol/l [hazard ratio (HR) 0.63; 95% CI 0.45, 0.87; P = 0.006), reduction of MRA dose (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.45, 0.87; P = 0.006), and total adjusted hyperkalemia events/100 person-years (77.7 vs. 118.2; HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.53, 0.81; P < 0.001) were lower with patiromer. Hyperkalemia-related morbidity-adjusted events (win ratio 1.53, P < 0.001) and total RAASi use score (win ratio 1.25, P = 0.048) favored the patiromer arm. Adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Concurrent use of patiromer and high-dose MRAs reduces the risk of recurrent hyperkalemia (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03888066).

Risk of Hospitalization for Heart Failure in Patients With Hyperkalemia Treated With Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Versus Patiromer.

BACKGROUND: Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) and patiromer were recently approved to treat hyperkalemia. Whether the initiation of SZC is associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) compared with patiromer in routine practice remains unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a new-user cohort study of nondialysis adults who initiated SZC or patiromer using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database from May 2018 to September 2020. We performed propensity score matching in a variable ratio to match each SZC initiator with up to 3 patiromer initiators. The primary outcome was HHF. Cox proportional hazards regression models generated hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals in the propensity score-matched groups. The cohort included 1126 SZC initiators and 2839 propensity score-matched patiromer initiators. The mean age was 72 years old, approximately 30% had a history of HF, and 85% had chronic kidney disease stages 3-5. The SZC group had 88 cases of HHF (incidence rate 35.8 per 100 person-years), and the patiromer group had 245 cases of HHF (incidence rate 25.1 per 100 person-years). The rate of HHF was numerically higher in the SZC initiators than patiromer initiators (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.95-1.56), but did not reach statistical significance. Results were consistent across sensitivity and subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The initiation of SZC might be associated with an increased risk of HHF compared with patiromer in routine practice. Larger comparative studies are needed to evaluate the safety of SZC in routine practice more precisely.

Pragmatic diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms to optimize new potassium binder use in cardiorenal disease.

BACKGROUND: Pivotal randomized trials demonstrating efficacy, safety and good tolerance, of two new potassium binders (patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate) led to their recent approval. A major hurdle to the implementation of these potassium-binders is understanding how to integrate them safely and effectively into the long-term management of cardiovascular and kidney disease patients using renin angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi), the latter being prone to induce hyperkalaemia. METHODS: A multidisciplinary academic panel including nephrologists and cardiologists was convened to develop consensus therapeutic algorithm(s) aimed at optimizing the use of the two novel potassium binders (patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate) in stable adults who require treatment with RAASi and experience(d) hyperkalaemia in a non-emergent setting. RESULTS: Two dedicated pragmatic algorithms are proposed. The lowest intervention threshold (i.e. 5.1 mmol/L or greater) was the one used in the patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate) pivotal trials, both drugs being indicated to treat hyperkalaemia in a non -emergent setting. Acknowledging the heterogeneity across specialty guidelines in hyperkalaemia definition and thresholds to intervene when facing hyperkalaemia, we have been mindful to use soft language i.e. "it is to consider", not necessarily "to do". CONCLUSIONS: Providing the clinical community with pragmatic algorithms may help optimize the management of high-risk patients by avoiding the risks of both hyper and hypokalaemia and of suboptimal RAASi therapy.

Hyperkalemia with RAAS inhibition: Mechanism, clinical significance, and management.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors are evidence-based treatments for a number of conditions including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and congestive heart failure. Among the most common adverse effects of RAAS inhibitors is hyperkalemia which results from either reduced secretion of aldosterone or increased resistance to aldosterone. Many of the conditions for which RAAS inhibitors are recommended further amplify the risk for hyperkalemia in and of themselves. RAAS inhibitor-related hyperkalemia is associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular events, hospitalizations, and death. Yet discontinuation of RAAS inhibitors for patients with chronic kidney disease and congestive heart failure is also associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular events, hospitalizations, and death. Therefore, clinicians are often left to struggle with the dilemma of the best management approach to RAAS inhibitor-related hyperkalemia. The ideal solution involves pharmacotherapies that are safe and effective in mitigating hyperkalemia and allow patients to continue to receive the beneficial effects from RAAS inhibitors. In this regard, modern pharmacologic agents such as patiromer and zirconium cyclosilicate are providing a mechanism whereby physicians are better equipped to maintain their patients on RAAS inhibitors.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists-Use in Chronic Kidney Disease.

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) are drugs with a potentially broad spectrum of action. They have been reported to have healing effects in many diseases, such as chronic heart failure, hypertension, or nephrotic syndrome. Numerous studies suggest that mineralocorticoid receptor activation is pathogenic and a progression factor of chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, results of studies on the use of MRA in the treatment of CKD are inconclusive. Current guidelines recommend against the use of MRA in patients with advanced CKD. Although, there is growing interest on their use in this population due to treatment benefits. In this review, we summarize studies which were purposed to evaluate the impact of MRA therapy on CKD patients. Despite many benefits of this treatment e.g., reducing cardiovascular mortality or alleviating proteinuria, steroidal MRA (such as spironolactone or eplerenone) have a low safety profile. They often lead to hyperkalemia complications which are dangerous in patients with CKD, and diabetic nephropathy, especially in hemodialysis patients. Studies on recently developed nonsteroidal MRA showed that they have fewer side effects. In our review, we discuss steroidal and nonsteroidal MRA treatment effects on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), proteinuria, the cardiovascular system, and hyperkalemia in CKD patients. We present new content and recent publications in this field.

Patiromer and Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate in Treatment of Hyperkalemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) are newer options for hyperkalemia treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the safety and side effect profile of patiromer and SZC compared with placebo or other standards of care in the management of hyperkalemia. METHODS: We searched electronic databases for relevant articles. The screening was performed independently and data were extracted among the selected studies. We performed a statistical analysis on Revman 5.4 software. The odds ratio (OR) was used for outcome estimation with a 95% CI. RESULTS: Patiromer had lower rates of hyperkalemia (OR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.89) compared with standard of care. The analysis showed no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of overall adverse effects, any serious/specific adverse effects, or treatment discontinuation as a result of adverse effects. Comparing the SZC-10 group with standard of care showed no significant differences in the occurrence of hyperkalemia during treatment, overall adverse effects, any serious/specific adverse effects, or treatment discontinuation as a result of adverse effects but showed a higher rate of edema in the treatment group (OR = 6.77; 95% CI, 1.03-44.25). Similarly, no significant differences were seen between the 2 SZC doses for the occurrence of any adverse effects, hyperkalemia, constipation, diarrhea, or urinary tract infection, whereas edema was higher among patients receiving SZC-10 (OR = 3.13; 95% CI, 1.19-8.27). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute hyperkalemia, SZC is the drug of choice due to its more rapid reduction of serum potassium level, whereas in patients with chronic hyperkalemia, patiromer appears to be the drug of choice because SZC is associated with an increase in edema, likely due to an increase in sodium absorption, which could have important adverse consequences in patients with chronic kidney disease and or heart failure. Thus, both drugs were found to be safe while treating hyperkalemia. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2021; 82:XXX-XXX).

Hyperkalemia in heart failure: current treatment and new therapeutic perspectives.

Hyperkalemia in heart failure is a condition that can occur with relative frequency because it is related to pathophysiological aspects of the disease, and favored by drugs that form the basis of chronic cardiac failure therapy. Often, associated comorbidities, such as kidney failure or diabetes mellitus can further adversely affect potassium levels. Hyperkalemia can result in acute and even severe clinical manifestations that put patients at risk. On the other hand, the finding of hyperkalemia in a chronic context can lead to a reduction in dosages or to suspension of drugs such as angiotensin-converting enzymes inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, and mineralcorticoid receptor antagonist, first line in the treatment of the disease, with negative effects in prognostic terms. Therapies for the correction of hyperkalemia have so far mainly concerned the treatment of acute clinical pictures. Newly developed molecules, such as patiromer or sodium zirconium cyclosilicate, now open new prospectives in the long-term management of hyperkalemia, and allow us to glimpse the possibility of a better titration of the cardinal drugs for heart failure, with consequent positive effects on patient prognosis. The aim of this review is to focus on the problem of hyperkalemia in the setting of heart failure, with particular regard to its incidence, its prognostic role, and the underlining pathophysiological mechanisms. The review also provides an overview of therapeutic strategies for correcting hyperkalemia in acute and chronic conditions, with a focus on the new potassium binders that promise to improve management of heart failure.

Resistant Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD): Prevalence, Treatment Particularities, and Research Agenda.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To explore the prevalence, treatment particularities, and research agenda in the management of resistant hypertension among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). RECENT FINDINGS: The prevalence of resistant hypertension is reported to be 2-3 times higher in patients with CKD than in the general hypertensive population. Based in part on the results of the PATHWAY-2 trial showing add-on spironolactone to be superior to placebo or active treatment with an α- or ß-blocker in reducing BP, international guidelines recommend the use of spironolactone as fourth-line agent in pharmacotherapy of resistant hypertension. Despite the several-fold higher burden of resistant hypertension among patients with stage 3b-4 CKD, the use of spironolactone in this population has been restricted, mainly due to the risk of hyperkalemia. The recently reported AMBER trial showed that among patients with uncontrolled resistant hypertension and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 25-45 ml/min/1.73m2, the newer potassium-binder patiromer prevented the development of hyperkalemia and increased the proportion of participants who remained on add-on spironolactone over 12 weeks of follow-up. Administration of spironolactone was associated with a clinically meaningful reduction of 11-12 mmHg in unattended automated office systolic blood pressure (BP) over the course of the AMBER trial. Newer potassium-binding therapies overcome the barrier of hyperkalemia and facilitate the persistent use of spironolactone, which is an effective add-on therapy to control BP in patients with resistant hypertension and advanced CKD. Future trials are now warranted to explore whether this strategy confers benefits on "hard" clinical outcomes in this high-risk population.

Evolution of Patiromer Use: a Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to present data from clinical trials that resulted in the key data supporting the use of patiromer as a potassium binder in clinical practice today. RECENT FINDINGS: In addition to trials that support the current Food and Drug Administration label and published over the past 3 years, the recently published Spironolactone With Patiromer in the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease (AMBER) trial provides clear benefits of patiromer use in a group of resistant hypertension patients. The AMBER was a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study that evaluated 295 participants stratified by local serum potassium measurement (4.3 to < 4.7 mmol/L vs 4.7 to 5.1 mmol/L) and history of diabetes and chronic kidney disease. The focus was on enabling participants with resistant hypertension to achieve blood pressure goals by using spironolactone. Additionally, the ongoing Patiromer for the Management of Hyperkalemia in Subjects Receiving RAASi Medications for the Treatment of Heart Failure (DIAMOND) trial is designed to demonstrate how patiromer is an "enabler" of therapies that are needed to either control resistant hypertension or reduce mortality in heart failure but generate hyperkalemia. These and other studies are discussed in detail. Patiromer is one of two new potassium binders that are far better tolerated than the previous agent and can be given chronically to participants who need life-saving therapies but have elevations of potassium into a dangerous range as a consequence.