Effect of voxelotor on murine bone marrow and peripheral blood with hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization for gene therapy of sickle cell disease.

In preparation for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection, current ex vivo gene therapy protocols for sickle cell disease require patients to undergo several months of chronic red cell transfusion. For health care equity, alternatives to red cell transfusion should be available. We examined whether treatment with GBT1118, the murine analog of voxelotor, could be a safe and feasible alternative to red cell transfusion. We found that 3 weeks of treatment with GBT1118 increased the percentage of bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells and upon plerixafor mobilization, the percentage of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells. Our data suggest that voxelotor should be further explored for its potential safety and utility as preparation for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection.

Impact of plerixafor use in the mobilization of blood grafts for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Plerixafor (PLER), a reversible antagonist of the CXC chemokine receptor type 4, has been in clinical use for mobilization of blood grafts for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) for about 15 years. Initially PLER was investigated in placebo-controlled trials with the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) filgrastim. It has also been used in combination with chemotherapy plus G-CSF in patients who had failed a previous mobilization attempt or appeared to mobilize poorly with current mobilization (preemptive use). This review summarizes what is known regarding addition of PLER to standard mobilization regimens. PLER increases mobilization of CD34+ cells, decreases the number of apheresis sessions needed to achieve collection targets and increases the proportion of patients who can proceed to AHCT. It appears also to increase the amount of various lymphocyte subsets in the grafts collected. In general, hematologic recovery after AHCT has been comparable to patients mobilized without PLER, although slower platelet recovery has been observed in some studies of patients who mobilize poorly. In phase III studies, long-term outcome has been comparable to patients mobilized without PLER. This also appears to be the case in patients receiving plerixafor for poor or suboptimal mobilization of CD34+ cells. In practice, PLER is safe and has not been shown to increase tumor cell mobilization.

How to manage poor mobilisers.

Autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (ASCT) has been used for more than five decades to treat malignant and non-malignant diseases. Successful engraftment after high-dose chemotherapy relies on the ability to collect sufficient CD34 + hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs), typically from peripheral blood after mobilization. Commonly, either granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone as a single agent (i.e. steady-state mobilization) or G-CSF after chemotherapy is administered to collect adequate numbers of HPCs (minimum ≥2 × 106 CD34 + cells/kg for one ASCT; optimal up to 5 × 106 CD34 + cells/kg). However, a significant proportion of patients fail successful HPC mobilization, which is commonly defined as a CD34+ cell count below 10-15/µL after at least 4 days of 10 µg/kg b.w. G-CSF alone, or after chemo-mobilization in combination with 5-10 µg/kg b.w. G-CSF. In these situations plerixafor, a chemokine receptor inhibitor (CXCR4) can be used to enhance HPC collection in patients with multiple myeloma and malignant lymphoma whose cells mobilize poorly. Risk factors for poor mobilization have been evaluated and several strategies (e.g. plerixafor to rescue the mobilization approach or pre-emptive use) have been suggested to optimize mobilization, especially in patients at risk. This manuscript discusses the risk factors of poor CD34+ mobilization and summarizes the current strategies to optimize mobilization and HPC collection.

Optimizing autologous stem cell collections for patients with multiple myeloma receiving G-CSF and Plerixafor: A single center project.

BACKGROUND: Increasing indications for cellular therapy collections have stressed our healthcare system, with autologous collections having a longer than desired wait time until apheresis collection. This quality improvement initiative was undertaken to accommodate more patients within existing resources. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with multiple myeloma who underwent autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection from October 2022 to April 2023 were included. Demographic, mobilization, laboratory, and apheresis data were retrospectively collected from the medical record. RESULTS: This cohort included 120 patients (49.2% male), with a median age of 60 years. All received G-CSF and 95% received pre-emptive Plerixafor approximately 18 hours pre-collection. Most (79%) had collection goals of at least 8 × 106/kg CD34 cells, with 63% over 70 years old having this high collection goal (despite 20 years of institutional data showing <1% over 70 years old have a second transplant). With collection efficiencies of 55.9%, 44% of patients achieved their collection goal in a single day apheresis collection. A platelet count <150 × 103/µL on the day of collection was a predictor for poor mobilization; among 27 patients with a low baseline platelet count, 17 did not achieve the collection goal and 2 failed to collect a transplantable dose. CONCLUSIONS: With minor collection goal adjustments, 15% of all collection appointments could have been avoided over this 6-month period. Other strategies to accommodate more patients include mobilization modifications (Plerixafor timing or substituting a longer acting drug), utilizing platelet counts to predict mobilization, and modifying apheresis collection volumes or schedule templates.

A comparative review of Aphexda and Mozobil for mobilization prior to stem cell collection.

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the standard of care for eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma leading to prolonged progression free and overall survival. Successful engraftment following hematopoietic stem cell infusion requires adequate stem cell doses. Current mobilization regimens include granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with or without plerixafor. Motixafortide is a recently approved agent that can be used in combination with G-CSF for mobilization. In the absence of any head-to-head trials comparing the two products, this article aims to outline the similarities and differences of these two agents. Though moxitafortide has a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile in comparison to plerixafor, in clinical trials, the agents demonstrated similar efficacy. In addition, the use of motixafortide in clinical practice may be limited by product cost as well as administration and monitoring requirements.

Effects of invivo CXCR4 blockade and proteasome inhibition on bone marrow plasma cells in HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates.

To date, plasma cell (PC)-targeted therapies have been limited by suboptimal PC depletion and antibody rebound. We hypothesized this is partly because of PC residence in protective bone marrow (BM) microenvironments. The purpose of this proof-of-concept study was to examine the effects of the CXCR4 antagonist, plerixafor, on PC BM residence; its safety profile (alone and in combination with a proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib); and the transcriptional effect on BMPCs in HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates. Participants were enrolled into 3 groups: group A (n = 4), plerixafor monotherapy; and groups B (n = 4) and C (n = 4), plerixafor and bortezomib combinations. CD34+ stem cell and PC levels increased in the blood after plerixafor treatment. PC recovery from BM aspirates varied depending on the dose of plerixafor and bortezomib. Single-cell RNA sequencing on BMPCs from 3 group C participants pretreatment and posttreatment revealed multiple populations of PCs, with a posttreatment enrichment of oxidative phosphorylation, proteasome assembly, cytoplasmic translation, and autophagy-related genes. Murine studies demonstrated dually inhibiting the proteasome and autophagy resulted in greater BMPC death than did monotherapies. In conclusion, this pilot study revealed anticipated effects of combined plerixafor and bortezomib on BMPCs, an acceptable safety profile, and suggests the potential for autophagy inhibitors in desensitization regimens.

Benefits of plerixafor for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells prior to autologous transplantation: a dual-center retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), hematopoietic stem cells must be stimulated to move from the bone marrow to the peripheral blood for harvesting. Plerixafor, a C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 antagonist, is used to increase stem cell harvests. However, the effects of plerixafor on post-ASCT outcomes remain unclear. METHODS: In a dual-center retrospective cohort study of 43 Japanese patients who received ASCT, the authors compared transplantation outcomes in patients who underwent stem cell mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with (n = 25) or without (n = 18) plerixafor. RESULTS: The number of days to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was significantly shorter with plerixafor than without plerixafor, as assessed by univariate (neutrophil, P = 0.004, platelet, P = 0.002), subgroup, propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting analyses. Although the cumulative incidence of fever was comparable with or without plerixafor (P = 0.31), that of sepsis was significantly lower with plerixafor than without (P < 0.01). Thus, the present data indicate that plerixafor leads to earlier neutrophil and platelet engraftment and a reduction of infectious risk. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that plerixafor may be safe to use and that it reduces the risk of infection in patients with a low CD34+ cell count the day before apheresis.

Plerixafor in autologous stem cell transplantation: Does it affect engraftment kinetics?

Plerixafor increases stem cell mobilization by reversibly binding to the chemokine receptor CXCR4. In our study, we examined the results of mobilization with plerixafor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and revealed their effects on autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) engraftment kinetics. The study included all cases of ASCT performed in the Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit of xxx University between January 2014 and January 2022. It included a total of 300 patients. The total number of CD34 + cells collected was 7.44 ± 4.19 in patients with plerixafor and 9.53 ± 6.09 in patients without plerixafor. The mean neutrophil and platelet engraftment took longer in plerixafor-mobilized patients (neutrophil: 12 ± 4.1 vs. 10.2 ± 2.7 days; platelet: 21.6 ± 13.9 vs. 14.2 ± 5.9 days; p = 0.008 and p = 0.002). The number of febrile neutropenia attacks was significantly higher in plerixafor-mobilized patients (p = 0.04). In the chemo-mobilized patient subgroup, plerixafor-mobilized patients experienced more febrile neutropenia attacks (p = 0.04). The mean time to both neutrophil and platelet engraftment was longer in patients mobilized with plerixafor. In the subgroup of patients with MM, the mean time to platelet engraftment was longer in patients mobilized with plerixafor. Plerixafor and its effect on engraftment kinetics should be evaluated with further studies in a larger population with survival analysis.

The efficacy of residual plerixafor for second-day stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus plerixafor has been shown to improve the efficacy of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization, however, due to its high price, the use of plerixafor is limited in China. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of residual plerixafor for second-day stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, 69 MM patients received G-CSF + plerixafor to mobilize PBSCs, which were collected from 28 patients only for one day and 41 patients for two days. Some of the patients received residual plerixafor, and PBSCs were collected on the second day. The data on the characteristics, different doses of plerixafor and efficacy of PBSC mobilization were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: After 1 or 2 apheresis procedures, 85.5% of patients collected more than 2 × 106 cells/kg PBSCs. There was no statistically significant difference in the success rate of CD34 + PBSC mobilization with the different doses of plerixafor on the first day, but the higher residual plerixafor dose resulted in better success rates on the second day (P＜0.001). Among the patients who collected PBSCs for two days, the level of the CD34 + cell yield of 24 patients (58.5%) changed better, which was significantly correlated with the dose of residual plerixafor on the second day (P = 0.001). DISCUSSION: These results suggested that the administration of residual plerixafor to mobilize stem cells on the second day is an economical, efficient and clinically feasible method.

A German-Wide Systematic Study on Mobilization and Collection of Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Poor Mobilizer Patients with Multiple Myeloma prior to Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.

Introduction: In patients with a clinical indication for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT), sufficient mobilization of CD34+ precursor cells into peripheral blood is essential to ensure adequate hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) collection prior to intensive therapy. However, with standard granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)-based mobilization schemes, an important minority of patients fail to mobilize sufficient (e.g., >10/µL) CD34+ cell counts into the peripheral blood and are considered as poor mobilizers (PM). Because failure to achieve sufficient CD34+ cell mobilization can negatively affect important clinical treatment endpoints, the use of plerixafor (PLX) was approved to increase CD34+ mobilization in PM patients. Methods: The German non-interventional, multicenter, open-label, prospective OPTIMOB study evaluated HSC mobilization strategies prior to planned ASCT in adult patients with hematologic malignancies (lymphomas or multiple myeloma [MM]) focusing on PM patients. PM patients were defined as follows: (1) never achieving ≥20 CD34+ cells/µL before 1st apheresis, (2) receiving PLX at any timepoint of mobilization, (3) their initially planned stem cell yield had to be reduced, or (4) they had not received apheresis due to low CD34+ count in peripheral blood. Results: 168 of 475 MM patients (35%) participating in the OPTIMOB study were classified as PM, and 155 of them (92%) received PLX (PM+PLX) during the study. PM patients were 40-78 years old, slightly more often male (n = 97, 58%), mostly newly diagnosed (n = 146, 87%) and received highly individualized previous treatments. Ninety-four of the PMs underwent chemotherapy mobilization (65%), and 51 patients (35%) received steady-state mobilization with G-CSF only during 1st mobilization attempt. 92% of the total PM population (n = 155) underwent apheresis, 78% of them (n = 117) achieved >2.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight on the 1st day of apheresis. PM+PLX had a higher median total collection result than those PM patients without PLX support (7.2 vs. 5.7 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight). In total, ASCT was performed in 136 PM+PLX (88%) versus 8 PM-PLX patients (62%). Conclusion: The OPTIMOB study showed that a considerable proportion of adult MM patients in Germany are PMs. Even though most of PMs were supported with PLX in the OPTIMOB study, PM-PLX also successfully mobilized HSCs, allowing ASCT in majority of all PMs. However, further analyses are required for treatment optimization in PMs.

Mobilization and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Collection in Poor Mobilizing Patients with Lymphoma: Final Results of the German OPTIMOB Study.

Introduction: Successful mobilization and collection of peripheral hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are necessary for lymphoma patients eligible for myeloablative chemotherapy with subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Albeit G-CSF alone or combined with chemotherapy is well-established methods for HSC mobilization, up to 40% of the patients fail to mobilize (poor mobilizer, PM). Plerixafor (PLX) is commonly used in PM patients resulting in increased migration of HSCs into peripheral blood and thus improves the collection outcome. Methods: The prospective, multicenter, open-label, non-interventional OPTIMOB study assessed mobilization and collection parameter of patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma to get deep insights in the treatment of those patients in clinical routine focusing on PM patients. PM was defined as follows: (1) no achievement of ≥20 CD34+ progenitor cells/µL before first apheresis, (2) PLX administration at any time point during the observational period, (3) reduction of the initially planned CD34+ progenitor cell yield as necessity due to failed mobilization or HSC collection, and (4) no performance of apheresis due to low CD34+ progenitor level. Primary objective of the study was to assess mobilization success by the proportion of PM patients achieving >2 × 106 CD34+ progenitor cells/kg body weight on the first day of apheresis. Here, the data of the lymphoma cohort are presented. Results: Out of 238 patients with lymphoma documented in the study, 32% were classified as PM. 87% of them received PLX. Demographic data revealed no obvious differences between PM and good mobilizing (GM) patients. All patients were treated highly individualized prior to mobilization. Majority of all PM patients were able to undergo apheresis (95%) and reached their individual requested CD34+ progenitor cell target (72%). 57% of the PM patients achieved >2.0 × 106 CD34+ progenitor cells/kg body weight on day 1 of apheresis and nearby 70% of them underwent ASCT. Median time to engraftment was similar in PM and GM patients of the lymphoma cohort. Conclusions: Majority of PM patients with lymphoma were successfully mobilized and underwent ASCT. Most of them received PLX during the study.

Mobilization Strategies in Myeloma Patients Intended for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Background: Multiple myeloma is currently the leading indication for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). A prerequisite for AHCT is mobilization and collection of adequate blood graft to support high-dose therapy. Current mobilization strategies include granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or in combination with chemotherapy most commonly cyclophosphamide (CY). More recently, plerixafor has become into agenda especially in patients who mobilize poorly. In the selection of a mobilization method, several factors should be considered. Summary: Preplanned collection target is important as G-CSF plus plerixafor is more effective in the mobilization of CD34+ cells than G-CSF alone. On the other hand, CY plus G-CSF is superior to G-CSF only mobilization. Previous therapy and age of the patients are important considerations as G-CSF alone may not be effective enough in patients with risk factors for poor mobilization. These factors include extensive lenalidomide exposure, irradiation to bone marrow-bearing sites, higher age, or a previous mobilization failure. Also, local preferences and experiences as well as the number of apheresis needed are important issues as well as cost-effectiveness considerations. Mobilization method used may have implication for cellular composition of collected grafts, which might have an impact on posttransplant events such as hematologic and immune recovery in addition to also potential long-term outcomes. Key Message: Currently, G-CSF alone and preemptive plerixafor if needed might be considered as a standard mobilization strategy in MM patients intended for AHCT.

WHIM syndrome: Immunopathogenesis, treatment and cure strategies.

WHIM syndrome is a rare, autosomal dominant immunodeficiency which is named for the four key manifestations: Warts, Hypogammaglobulinemia, Infections, and Myelokathexis. It results from heterozygous gain-of-function mutations in the chemokine receptor CXCR4 which is widely expressed on leukocytes and has profound influences on immune system homeostasis and organogenesis. New treatments for the disease using drugs to reduce CXCR4 function are excellent examples of precision medicine. Since CXCR4 and its ligand CXCL12 play an important role in a variety of infectious, inflammatory, autoimmune, and malignant diseases, the study of WHIM syndrome provides important insights into both the physiologic and disease roles of these molecules.

Development of a quantitative prediction model for peripheral blood stem cell collection yield in the plerixafor era.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Predicting autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection yield before leukapheresis is important for optimizing PBSC mobilization and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for treating hematological malignancies. Although guidelines for plerixafor usage based on peripheral blood CD34+ (PB-CD34+) cell count are available, their predictive performance in the real world remains unclear. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 55 mobilization procedures for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma or multiple myeloma and developed a novel quantitative prediction model for CD34+ cell collection yield that incorporated four clinical parameters available the day before leukapheresis; namely, PB-CD34+ cell count the day before apheresis (day -1 PB-CD34+), number of prior chemotherapy regimens, disease status at apheresis and mobilization protocol. RESULTS: The effects of PB-CD34+ cell counts on CD34+ cell collection yield varied widely per patient characteristics, and plerixafor usage was recommended in patients with poorly controlled disease or those with a history of heavy pre-treatments even with abundant day -1 PB-CD34+ cell count. This model suggested a more proactive use of plerixafor than that recommended by the guidelines for patients with poor pre-collection condition or those with a higher target number of CD34+ cells. Further, the authors analyzed the clinical outcomes of ASCT and found that plerixafor use for stem cell mobilization did not affect short- or long-term outcomes after ASCT. CONCLUSIONS: Although external validations are necessary, the results can be beneficial for establishing more effective and safer mobilization strategies.

Efficacy and safety of a reduced dose of plerixafor in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in healthy haploidentical stem cell donors.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Implementation of the technique of immunomagnetic selection requires the procurement of a large number of CD34+ cells from haploidentical donors within a single apheresis procedure. The release of stem cells with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone is unsatisfactory in a number of donors, and plerixafor, a CXCR4 chemokine receptor antagonist, could be used as an additional mobilization agent. The aim of our study was to examine whether a lower dose of plerixafor (0.12 mg/kg) can provide sufficient increase in CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood of allogeneic healthy donors in comparison with a historical control group. In addition, we assessed the risk of inability to provide the recipient with a transplant containing the optimal dose of 8-10 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight of the recipient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective, single-arm study, we examined the results of 105 mobilizations in healthy adult haploidentical donors with G-CSF and plerixafor at a dose of 0.12 mg/kg. The historical control group consisted of 106 mobilizations with G-CSF and plerixafor at 0.24 mg/kg. RESULTS: The median increase in the number of CD34+ cells from day 4 to day 5 of mobilization was 69 cells/µl (range, 28-240) versus 77 cells/µl (24-217) in the groups of 0.12 and 0.24 mg/kg of plerixafor, respectively (p-value 0.255). The apheresis products contained a median of 14.4 × 106 /kg recipient body weight CD34+ cells versus 12.9 × 106 /kg in the groups that received 0.12 and 0.24 mg/kg of plerixafor, respectively (p-value 0.118). The obtained differences were not significant, which means the application of a decreased dose of plerixafor did not affect the results of mobilization. CONCLUSION: The obtained differences in collection were not significant, and thus the application of a decreased dose of plerixafor did not affect the results of mobilization.

A comparison of four leukapheresis methods to harvest an optimal dose of CD34+ cells: A single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Chemokine receptor CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor (Px) as well as high volume (HV) leukapheresis have been shown to reduce hematopoietic stem progenitor cell (HSPC) mobilization failure rates. However, no direct comparisons of such methods currently exists. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We compared the HSPC collection yield based on basal peripheral blood CD34+ cell numbers in patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation in a retrospective chart review. The leukapheresis methods used included HV versus regular volume (RV) with or without Px. There were 116 patients in the study group while the historical control group had 34 patients. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Control group underwent RV leukapheresis without Px. Addition of Px or HV in the study group failed to display significant improvement in CD34+ cell collection yield; however, when basal CD34+ cell numbers were taken into account, both Px + RV and HV without Px increased CD34+ cell collection yield. The collection failure rates of HV without Px group were comparable to Px + RV when the basal CD34+ cell numbers were over 20/µl. Of interest, multivariate linear regression analysis did not detect any significant difference between HV versus Px + RV or other leukapheresis methods in CD34 yields or collection failure rates from a single collection after controlling for other factors (sex, age, or underlying disease). In multivariate analysis, pre apheresis CD34+ cell number was significantly and positively associated with the CD34+ cell yields from a single apheresis. In our studies, the majority of patients can be rescued without Px by HV alone as a potential cost saving approach. In summary, trend in our studies reflects that both Px and HV are capable of reducing the mobilization failure rates except the poorest mobilizers, which will need to be validated in larger studies.

Plerixafor strategies for autologous hematopoietic cell transplant mobilization: A comparison of efficacy and cost.

Addition of plerixafor (P) to granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) during peripheral blood mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) increases the number of patients meeting collection goals prior to autologous stem cell transplant (aSCT). However, use of P is not universal among transplant centers due to cost. This study aims to compare clinical and financial impacts of using an algorithm-based P mobilization strategy versus use in all patients. This was a single center, retrospective analysis of adult patients with myeloma or amyloidosis receiving aSCT who received apheresis of their HSC between 3/1/2017 and 3/1/2019. Patients prior to 3/1/2018 were classified as receiving P "per algorithm" and those after this date were classified as "up-front" P. For the per-algorithm group, P was given for a pre-apheresis CD34+ cell count of <20 cells/µL on mobilization day 5 and patients returned on day 6 for apheresis. Of the 129 patients included, 55 received P per-algorithm and 74 received up-front P. There was a reduction in median number of apheresis days (1.5 vs 1 day, p < 0.001) and an increase in median number of CD34+ cells collected (6.6 vs 8.5 × 106 cells/kg, p < 0.001) with up-front P. Up-front P increased drug cost but reduced apheresis costs, which resulted in a net savings of $121 per patient in total mobilization costs. These findings suggest that use of up-front P for mobilization significantly reduces apheresis days and increases HSC collection yield without increasing overall cost per patient.

Addition of plerixafor in poorly mobilized allogeneic stem cell donors.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are the predominant graft source for adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In poorly mobilized autologous donors, plerixafor improves collection outcomes. We examine plerixafor use in allogeneic donors who mobilize poorly with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in those who are healthy and those with pre-existing medical conditions, and determine the optimal threshold to add plerixafor. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS: We retrospectively examined all allogeneic PBSC collections from January 2013 to October 2020 at our center. Donors received G-CSF 10 mcg/kg daily for 4 days before undergoing apheresis collection on day 5. Plerixafor was added based on poor CD34+ cell collection yield after the first or second collection day. RESULTS: Of the 1008 allogeneic donors, 41 (4.1%) received one dose of plerixafor in addition to G-CSF due to poor collection yield. After starting plerixafor there was a 0.75- to 7.74-fold (median 2.94) increase in CD34+ yield from the previous day. No donors with G-CSF-only mobilization who collected <2.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg recipient weight on day one achieved the goal of ≥4.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg recipient weight total over 2 days but 59.2% of donors who used rescue plerixafor did. CONCLUSION: Donors both healthy and those with pre-existing disease responded well to plerixafor with minimal side effects. If the first-day collection yield is less than ~63% of the collection goal, addition of plerixafor may be necessary to reach the collection goal and limit the number of collection days in allogeneic donors.

Mobilized and apheresis-collected endothelial progenitor cells with plerixafor.

BACKGROUND: Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are immature cells able to proliferate and contribute to endothelial repair, vascular homeostasis, neovascularization, and angiogenesis. It therefore seems likely that circulating EPCs have therapeutic potential in ischemic and vascular diseases. In this study we evaluated the efficiency of EPC mobilization and collection by large volume leukapheresis in subjects with hematological diseases, treated with plerixafor in association with G-CSF. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with lymphoid malignancies underwent rHuG-CSF and plerixafor treatment followed by leukapheresis. Blood samples before and after treatment and apheresis liquid sample were taken and analyzed by flow cytometry in order to quantified EPC. RESULTS: The percentage of CD34+ cells and EPCs among circulating total nuclear cells (TNCs) increased significantly by approximately 2-fold and 3-fold, respectively, after plerixafor treatment. Consequently, the absolute number of CD34+ cells and EPCs were increased 4-fold after plerixafor treatment. The median PB concentration of EPCs before and after treatment were 0.77/µL (0.31-2.15) and 3.41/µL (1.78-4.54), respectively, P < .0001. The total EPCs collected per patient were 3.3×107 (0.8×107 -6.8×107 ). CONCLUSION: We have shown that plerixafor in combination with G-CSF allows the mobilization and collection of large amounts of EPCs along with CD34+ cells in lymphoid neoplasm patients. The possibility to collect and to store these cells could represent a promising therapeutic tool for the treatment of ischemic complications without the need of in vitro expansion.

Successful "on-demand" plerixafor for autologous peripheral blood stem-cells transplantation for relapsed/refractory germ cell tumors.

BACKGROUND: Germ cell tumors represent, among solid cancers, a potentially curable disease even if up to 20% to 30% of patients (pts) relapse after first-line treatment especially considering intermediate and poor prognosis groups. In this scenario, patients are candidates for high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cells transplantation as second-line treatment even though stem-cells mobilization potential can be affected by several cycles and regimens of chemotherapy. To date, plerixafor is authorized in poor mobilizer adult pts diagnosed with lymphoma or multiple myeloma and in pediatric solid tumors or lymphoma. Therefore, the use of plerixafor in adult pts with relapsing/refractory GCT is still off label. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our study, we describe mobilization and collection of peripheral blood stem cells for 10 pts with germ cell tumors. Six patients underwent plerixafor administration since classified as poor mobilizers based on WBC count (>5.000/µL) and CD34+ cell count (<15/µL) the day before apheresis procedure. RESULTS: On the first day of apheresis, plerixafor administration in poor mobilizers made possible a remarkable boost of CD34+ cells in such a way to overlap that of good mobilizers' (32/µL vs 35/µL, respectively, P > .05). CONCLUSION: Therefore, in our experience, plerixafor made a good fraction of poor mobilizer patients eligible for mobilization and collection and able to undergo the predicted autologous stem-cells transplantation; thus, the lack of access to the use of plerixafor in this setting of patients risks jeopardizing an effective treatment, especially in case of poor prognosis.