Patient-reported symptoms before adjuvant locoregional radiotherapy for breast cancer: triple-negative histology impacts the symptom burden.

BACKGROUND: Multimodal breast cancer treatment may cause side effects reflected in patient-reported outcomes and/or symptom scores at the time of treatment planning for adjuvant radiotherapy. In our department, all patients have been assessed with the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS; a questionnaire addressing 11 major symptoms and wellbeing on a numeric scale of 0-10) at the time of treatment planning since 2016. In this study, we analyzed ESAS symptom severity before locoregional radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of 132 patients treated between 2016 and 2021 (all comers in breast-conserving or post-mastectomy settings, different radiotherapy fractionations) was performed. All ESAS items and the ESAS point sum were analyzed to identify subgroups with higher symptom burden and thus need for additional care measures. RESULTS: The biggest patient-reported issues were fatigue, pain, and sleep problems. Patients with triple negative breast cancer reported a higher symptom burden (mean 30 versus 20, p = 0.038). Patients assigned to adjuvant endocrine therapy had the lowest point sum (mean 18), followed by those on Her-2-targeting agents without chemotherapy (mean 19), those on chemotherapy with or without other drugs (mean 26), and those without systemic therapy (mean 41), p = 0.007. Those with pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant treatment had significantly lower anxiety scores (mean 0.7 versus 1.8, p = 0.03) and a trend towards lower depression scores, p = 0.09. CONCLUSION: Different surgical strategies, age, and body mass index did not impact on ESAS scores, while the type of adjuvant systemic therapy did. The effect of previous neoadjuvant treatment and unfavorable tumor biology (triple negative) emerged as important factors associated with symptom burden, albeit in different domains. ESAS data may facilitate identification of patients who should be considered for additional supportive measures to alleviate specific symptoms.

Factors associated with adjuvant treatment delays in patients treated surgically for head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the patient and treatment characteristics associated with delay in post-operative radiation therapy (PORT) for patients treated surgically for head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) at our institution. DESIGN: Single institution retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary care academic medical centre. PARTICIPANTS: Patients treated surgically for HNSCC who underwent PORT between 2013 and 2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: One hundred forty patients met inclusion criteria. A majority did not start radiotherapy within 6 weeks. Factors associated with a delayed initiation of PORT included length of stay >8 days, 30-day readmission, no adjuvant chemotherapy, post-operative complications and fragmented care. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of patients did not initiate PORT within the guideline-recommended 6 weeks. Modifiable risks factors that delay initiation of PORT were identified.

[Comparative analysis of combined treatment methods for patients with single brain lesions]. / Sravnitel'nyi analiz kombinirovannykh metodov lecheniya patsientov s odinochnym metastaticheskim porazheniem golovnogo mozga.

Primary brain metastases are common in oncology. Preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery followed by surgical resection is a perspective approach. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate own experience of preoperative radiosurgery followed by surgical resection (RS+S) of metastasis regarding local control, leptomeningeal progression, surgical and radiation-induced complications; to compare treatment outcomes with surgical resection and subsequent radiotherapy (S+SRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS. A: Retrospective study included 66 patients with solitary brain metastasis. Two groups of patients were distinguished: group 1 (n=34) - postoperative irradiation, group 2 (n=32) - preoperative irradiation. The median age was 49.5 years (range 36-75). RESULTS: Local 3-, 6- and 12-month control among patients with postoperative irradiation was 88.2%, 79.4% and 42.9%, in the group of preoperative irradiation - 100%, 93.3% and 66.7%, respectively (p=0.021). Leptomeningeal progression developed in 11 patients (8 and 3 ones, respectively). The one-year survival rate was 73.5% and 84.4%, respectively (p=0.33). Long-term surgical and radiation-induced complications occurred in 12 (18.2%) patients. CONCLUSION: Preoperative radiosurgery with subsequent resection provides higher local control and lower incidence of leptomeningeal progression in patients with single brain metastases.

Impact of Immediate Breast Reconstruction on Survival of Breast Cancer Patients: A Single-Center Observational Study.

Although immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy has become increasingly common, its oncological safety has been debated. We enrolled patients with breast cancer who underwent surgery at Okayama University Hospital between 2007 and 2013. The primary outcome was relapse-free survival (RFS). Secondary outcomes were overall survival and the duration from the surgery to the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy. We divided into immediate breast reconstruction, mastectomy alone, and breast conservative surgery groups. Outcomes were compared using Cox's regression analysis. A total of 614 patients were included (reconstruction: 125, mastectomy: 128, breast conservative surgery: 361). The median follow-up duration was 79.0±31.9 months. The immediate-reconstruction patients were younger, had more lymph node metastases, and more often received postoperative chemotherapy. The RFS was better after the breast conservative surgery compared to after reconstruction (hazard ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval: 0.144-0.763). The proportion of local recurrence was highest in the reconstruction group. No patients in the reconstruction group underwent postoperative radiation therapy. However, reconstruction did not affect overall survival or the time to the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy. Surgeons should explain the risks of breast reconstruction to their patients preoperatively. Careful long-term follow-up is required after such procedures.

Survival Benefit of Guideline-Concordant Postoperative Radiation for Local Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative radiation therapy (RT) for early-stage Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) decreases the risk of locoregional recurrence and improve overall survival. However, concordance with RT guidelines is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for stage I/II MCC patients receiving surgical intervention from 2006-2017. The cohort was stratified by patients who had and did not have indication(s) for adjuvant RT of the primary tumor site based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. We captured the use of RT, patient demographics, socioeconomic characteristics, and clinical characteristics. Logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier method, and propensity score weighted Cox proportional hazards model examined associations and survival benefits of RT. RESULTS: 2,330 stage I/II MCC patients underwent surgical intervention. 1,858 (79.7%) met National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria for RT of the primary tumor site, of which 1,062 (57.2%) received RT. 472 (20.3%) did not meet criteria for RT, of which 203 (43.0%) received RT. Five-year overall survival advantage was identified for patients who received RT when it was indicated (P < 0.003). There was no evidence of overall survival advantage when patients received guideline-discordant RT (P = 0.478). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection with adjuvant RT of the primary tumor site has an overall survival benefit for local MCC when patients meet criteria for RT. This study found a group who received guideline-discordant RT with no survival advantage. Further investigation is warranted to identify the socio-demographic and oncologic reasons for guideline discordance in the treatment of MCC for both under- and over-treatment.

Papillary meningioma of the central nervous system: a SEER database analysis.

Papillary meningioma (PM) is a rare central nervous system tumor. We aimed to analyze the characteristics and outcomes of patients with PM (WHO grade III) and identify risk factors that influence survival using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Clinical characteristics, tumor features, and outcomes of 108 PM patients included in the SEER database between 1990 and 2016 were retrieved. Risk factors related to prognosis of PM were assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and the Cox proportional hazards model. All 108 patients, including 65 males and 43 females (1.5:1), with a median age of 52 years (range, 9 to > 85 years) had undergone surgical resection. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 50%, and 50% underwent subtotal resection (STR). While 55.6% underwent postoperative radiation therapy, 48% did not. The median disease-specific survival (DSS) was 128 months, and the 5-year DSS rate was 77%. In multivariate analysis, age ≤ 52 years and GTR were both independently associated with higher probability of DSS (p = 0.033 and p = 0.029, respectively). Stratification analysis showed that postoperative radiotherapy had no significant impact on the DSS, irrespective of resection extent (p = 0.172). Our SEER analysis showed that age and extent of resection were prognostic factors for PM, but race, tumor size, gender, chemotherapy, and postoperative radiotherapy did not significantly impact DSS of PM patients. There was no significant improvement in survival of patients who underwent radiotherapy and GTR, or radiotherapy and STR, compared with GTR or STR alone.

Comparative toxicity outcomes of proton-beam therapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer in the postoperative setting.

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing utilization of proton-beam therapy (PBT) in the postprostatectomy setting, no data exist regarding toxicity outcomes relative to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The authors compared acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PC) who received treatment with postprostatectomy IMRT versus PBT. METHODS: With institutional review board approval, patients with PC who received adjuvant or salvage IMRT or PBT (70.2 gray with an endorectal balloon) after prostatectomy from 2009 through 2017 were reviewed. Factors including combined IMRT and PBT and/or concurrent malignancies prompted exclusion. A case-matched cohort analysis was performed using nearest-neighbor 3-to-1 matching by age and GU/GI disorder history. Logistic and Cox regressions were used to identify univariate and multivariate associations between toxicities and cohort/dosimetric characteristics. Toxicity-free survival (TFS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Three hundred seven men (mean ± SD age, 59.7 ± 6.3 years; IMRT, n = 237; PBT, n = 70) were identified, generating 70 matched pairs. The median follow-up was 48.6 and 46.1 months for the IMRT and PBT groups, respectively. Although PBT was superior at reducing low-range (volumes receiving 10% to 40% of the dose, respectively) bladder and rectal doses (all P ≤ .01), treatment modality was not associated with differences in clinician-reported acute or late GU/GI toxicities (all P ≥ .05). Five-year grade ≥2 GU and grade ≥1 GI TFS was 61.1% and 73.7% for IMRT, respectively, and 70.7% and 75.3% for PBT, respectively; and 5-year grade ≥3 GU and GI TFS was >95% for both groups (all P ≥ .05). CONCLUSIONS: Postprostatectomy PBT minimized low-range bladder and rectal doses relative to IMRT; however, treatment modality was not associated with clinician-reported GU/GI toxicities. Future prospective investigation and ongoing follow-up will determine whether dosimetric differences between IMRT and PBT confer clinically meaningful differences in long-term outcomes.

Chondrocutaneous Bilateral Advancement Flap with Postoperative Radiation Therapy for a Helical Rim Keloid.

Keloids can be recalcitrant, and a well-planned treatment strategy is essential. Multiple ear piercings have recently become popular, particularly among younger age groups. Management of keloids that develop after piercing of the ear cartilage may be particularly problematic. Helical rim keloids are difficult to excise because of the complex, three-dimensional, cartilaginous structure of the helix and its thin and tightly adherent covering layer of skin. The chondrocutaneous advancement flap introduced by Antia and Buch may be a useful reconstructive option for a helical rim keloid after marginal loss of a segment of the helix as a result of trauma, a burn, or excision of a malignant tumor. However, this technique is limited to wounds that involve only the helix. In this technical note, we describe the use of a chondrocutaneous bilateral advancement flap with postoperative radiation therapy to treat a more invasive and relatively large keloid on the scapha. This technique is straightforward and safe in terms of preserving the blood supply. The addition of adjuvant radiation therapy can help to decrease the risk of recurrence and preserve the morphological structure of the ear and patient satisfaction.Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Survival in patients with primary dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: National Cancer Database analysis.

BACKGROUND: The predictors of mortality, second surgery, and postoperative radiation therapy for treating dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) are not well described. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the impact of patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment site and modality on survival after primary DFSP. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data from the National Cancer Database was performed for patients diagnosed with DFSP during 2003-2012. RESULTS: A total of 5249 cases were identified. Of these, 3.1% of patients died during an average of 51.4 months of follow-up. After adjusting for relevant factors, lack of insurance, Medicaid and Medicare insurance, anaplastic histology, and positive postoperative margins all predicted mortality, while treatment at an Integrated Network Cancer Program predicted survival (P < .05). Higher odds of postoperative radiation therapy were directly associated with large tumor size, anaplastic and poorly differentiated histology, and positive postoperative margins and inversely associated with treatment at high volume facilities, and non-head and neck tumors. Higher second surgery rates were associated with Hispanic ethnicity, and lower rates were associated with female sex. LIMITATIONS: Survival data was not cancer-specific. CONCLUSION: Better understanding of factors affecting survival outcomes might help improve management of DFSP and delineate other potential causes of increased morbidity and mortality.

A multi-institutional comparison of outcomes of immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients treated with surgery and radiation therapy for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Patients who are chronically immunosuppressed have higher rates of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (cSCC-HN). This is the largest multi-institutional study to date investigating the effect of immune status on disease outcomes in patients with cSCC-HN who underwent surgery and received postoperative radiation therapy (RT). METHODS: Patients from 3 institutions who underwent surgery and also received postoperative RT for primary or recurrent, stage I through IV cSCC-HN between 1995 and 2015 were included in this institutional review board-approved study. Patients categorized as immunosuppressed had chronic hematologic malignancy, human immunodeficiency/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, or had received immunosuppressive therapy for organ transplantation ≥6 months before diagnosis. Overall survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, and progression-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional-hazards regression. RESULTS: Of 205 patients, 138 (67.3%) were immunocompetent, and 67 (32.7%) were immunosuppressed. Locoregional recurrence-free survival (47.3% vs 86.1%; P < .0001) and progression-free survival (38.7% vs 71.6%; P = .002) were significantly lower in immunosuppressed patients at 2 years. The 2-year OS rate in immunosuppressed patients demonstrated a similar trend (60.9% vs 78.1%; P = .135) but did not meet significance. On multivariate analysis, immunosuppressed status (hazard ratio [HR], 3.79; P < .0001), recurrent disease (HR, 2.67; P = .001), poor differentiation (HR, 2.08; P = .006), and perineural invasion (HR, 2.05; P = .009) were significantly associated with locoregional recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppressed patients with cSCC-HN had dramatically lower outcomes compared with immunocompetent patients, despite receiving bimodality therapy. Immune status is a strong prognostic factor that should be accounted for in prognostic systems, treatment algorithms, and clinical trial design. Cancer 2017;123:2054-2060. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Effect of time to initiation of postoperative radiation therapy on survival in surgically managed head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the effects of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline-adherent initiation of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) and different time-to-PORT intervals on the overall survival (OS) of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was reviewed for the period of 2006-2014, and patients with HNSCC undergoing surgery and PORT were identified. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, Cox regression analysis, and propensity score matching were used to determine the effects of initiating PORT within 6 weeks of surgery and different time-to-PORT intervals on survival. RESULTS: This study included 41,291 patients. After adjustments for covariates, starting PORT >6 weeks postoperatively was associated with decreased OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.13; 99% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.19). This finding remained in the propensity score-matched subset (hazard ratio, 1.21; 99% CI, 1.15-1.28). In comparison with starting PORT 5 to 6 weeks postoperatively, initiating PORT earlier was not associated with improved survival (aHR for ≤ 4 weeks, 0.93; 99% CI, 0.85-1.02; aHR for 4-5 weeks, 0.92; 99% CI, 0.84-1.01). Increasing durations of delay beyond 7 weeks were associated with small, progressive survival decrements (aHR, 1.09, 1.10, and 1.12 for 7-8, 8-10, and >10 weeks, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Nonadherence to NCCN guidelines for initiating PORT within 6 weeks of surgery was associated with decreased survival. There was no survival benefit to initiating PORT earlier within the recommended 6-week timeframe. Increasing durations of delay beyond 7 weeks were associated with small, progressive survival decrements. Cancer 2017;123:4841-50. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Survival benefit of postoperative radiation in papillary meningioma: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.

AIM/BACKGROUND: Papillary meningioma represents a rare subset of World Health Organization (WHO) Grade III meningioma that portends an overall poor prognosis. There is relatively limited data regarding the benefit of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT). We used the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) to compare overall survival (OS) outcomes of surgically resected papillary meningioma cases undergoing PORT compared to post-operative observation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The NCDB was queried for patients with papillary meningioma, diagnosed between 2004 and 2013, who underwent upfront surgery with or without PORT. Overall survival (OS) was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) analyses were performed. RESULTS: In total, 190 patients were identified; 89 patients underwent PORT, 101 patients were observed. Eleven patients received chemotherapy (6 with PORT, 5 without). 2-Year OS was significantly improved with PORT vs. no PORT (93.0% vs. 74.4%), as was 5-year OS (78.5% vs. 62.5%) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.85; p = 0.01). On MVA, patients receiving PORT had improved OS compared to observation (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.76; p = 0.005). On subset analysis by age group, the benefit of PORT vs. no PORT was significant in patients ≤18 years (n = 13), with 2-year OS of 85.7% vs. 50.0% (HR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01-0.80; p = 0.032) and for patients >18 years (n = 184), with 2-year OS of 94.7% vs. 76.1% (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31-1.00; p = 0.049), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this large contemporary analysis, PORT was associated with improved survival for both adult and pediatric patients with papillary meningioma. PORT should be considered in those who present with this rare, aggressive tumor.

Total Hip Arthroplasty for Patients Who Have Ankylosing Spondylitis: Is Postoperative Irradiation Required for Prophylaxis of Heterotopic Ossification?

Postoperative radiation for prevention of heterotopic ossification (HO) has been proven effective for the patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) after total hip arthroplasties (THA). This study aims to evaluate the effect of postoperative radiation in HO formation following THA in patients with AS. We retrospectively reviewed 129 hips from 91 patients with AS receiving primary THA from July 2004 to December 2012. There were total 38 patients (53 hips) did not receive postoperative prophylaxis in Group I. Moreover, 53 patients (76 hips) received postoperative single-fraction radiotherapy of 500 cGy in Group II. After a minimum 12-month follow-up, there was no significant difference in HO formation between the two groups (P=0.210). This study suggests that postoperative radiation may not be necessary in Asian patients.

Decreasing utilization for postoperative radiation therapy in locoregionally advanced medullary thyroid cancer.

BACKGROUND: Use of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) in locoregionally advanced medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) remains controversial. The objective was to evaluate the effect of PORT on locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 346 MTC patients separated into PORT and no-PORT cohorts. Relative indications for PORT, as well as changes in patterns of treatment, were recorded. RESULTS: 49/346 (14%) received PORT. PORT was associated with worse OS; adjusted HR = 2.0 (95%CI 1.3-3.3). PORT was not associated with improved LRC, even when adjusting for advanced stage (Stage III p = 0.892; Stage IV p = 0.101). PORT and targeted therapy were not associated with improved OS compared to targeted therapy alone; adjusted HR = 1.2 (95%CI 0.3-4.1). CONCLUSIONS: Use of PORT in MTC has decreased and its indications have become more selective, coinciding with the advent of effective targeted therapies. Overall, PORT was not associated with improved LRC or OS.

Facility Volume and Changing Facilities for Postoperative Radiotherapy in Salivary Gland Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Changing location of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) after treatment at a high-volume facility (HVF) is associated with worse survival in various head and neck cancers. Our study investigates this relationship in salivary gland cancer (SGC). METHODS: The 2004-2016 National Cancer Database was queried for all cases of adult SGC treated with surgery and PORT with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with multiple cancer diagnoses, metastatic disease, or unknown PORT facility were excluded. Reporting facilities with >95th percentile annual case volume were classified as HVFs, the remainder were classified low-volume facilities (LVFs). RESULTS: A total of 7885 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 418 (5.3%) were treated at an HVF. Patients treated at an HVF had higher rates clinical nodal positivity (18.2% vs. 14.0%, p < 0.001) and clinical T3/T4 (27.3% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.001) disease. Patients at HVFs changed facility for PORT at lower rates (18.9% vs. 24.5%, p = 0.009). Patients treated at an HVF had higher 5-year overall survival (5-OS) than those treated at an LVF (79.0% vs. 72.0%, p = 0.042). Patients treated at an HVF that changed PORT facility had worse 5-OS (60.8% vs. 83.2%, p < 0.001). Radiation facility change was an independent predictor of worse survival in patients treated at an HVF (HR: 8.99 [3.15-25.67], p < 0.001) but not for patients treated at a LVF (HR: 1.11 [0.98-1.25], p = 0.109). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated at an HVF changing facility for PORT for SGC experience worse survival. Our data suggest patients treated surgically at an HVF should be counseled to continue their PORT at the same institution. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Postoperative Radiotherapy in Advanced Stage Squamous Cell Carcinoma Requiring Maxillectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) improves survival among patients who received maxillectomy for pT4aN0 maxillary gingival or hard palate squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with respect to tumor size. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2019. METHODS: Included adult patients who received maxillectomy (partial, subtotal, or total) and neck dissection for treatment-naive margin negative pT4aN0 SCC of the maxillary gingiva or hard palate. Adjusted for age, gender, race, insurance status, income, education, urban/rural, facility type, region, comorbidity index, tumor grade, and tumor extension. Inverse probability weights were incorporated into a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. A priori post hoc subgroup analysis was performed according to tumor size. RESULTS: We included 416 patients who underwent maxillectomy for pT4aN0 SCC of the maxillary gingiva or hard palate (mean [standard deviation] age, 71.5 [11.3] years; male, 190 [45.7%]; tumor size 2 cm, 362 [87%]). Overall, 49.3% of patients received PORT (205 patients). PORT was associated with a 50% improvement in survival compared to surgery alone (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.32-0.81). On subgroup analysis, PORT was associated with improved survival for tumors 2 cm (aHR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.29-0.77), but not for tumors < 2 cm (aHR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.33-4.08). CONCLUSION: The vast majority of patients with pT4aN0 bone-invading SCC of the maxillary gingiva and hard palate benefit from PORT. Patients with tumors < 2 cm did not demonstrate a survival benefit from adjuvant treatment, suggesting that bony invasion alone may not be sufficient criteria for treatment escalation.

Malignant Eccrine Spiradenoma of the Posterior Scalp: An Odd Presentation.

Malignant eccrine spiradenoma is a rare cutaneous adnexal neoplasm and is often a result of the malignant transformation of a benign eccrine spiradenoma. A woman without a history of skin cancer presented with a mass on her posterior scalp. An excisional biopsy was obtained, and histology was consistent with eccrine spiradenocarcinoma with the lesion extending to all margins of the excision specimen. Physical exam and imaging did not reveal lymph node involvement or distant spread of disease. It was recommended that the patient undergo wide local excision.

Update on adherence to guidelines for time to initiation of postoperative radiation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: A prior study reported that over half of patients with HNSCC initiated PORT after 6 weeks from surgery during 2006-2014. In 2022, the CoC released a quality metric for patients to initiate PORT within 6 weeks. This study provides an update on time to PORT in recent years. METHODS: The NCDB and TriNetX Research Network were queried to identify patients with HNSCC who received PORT during 2015-2019 and 2015-2021, respectively. Treatment delay was defined as initiating PORT beyond 6 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: In NCDB, PORT was delayed for 62% of patients. Predictors of delay included age >50, female sex, black race, nonprivate insurance/uninsured status, lower education, oral cavity site, negative surgical margins, increased postoperative length of stay, unplanned hospital readmissions, IMRT radiation modality, treatment at an academic hospital or in the Northeast, and surgery and radiation at different facilities. In TriNetX, 64% experienced treatment delay. Additional associations with prolonged time to treatment included never married/divorced/widowed marital status, major surgery (neck dissection/free flaps/laryngectomy), and gastrostomy/tracheostomy dependence. CONCLUSIONS: There continue to be challenges to timely initiation of PORT.

Prognostic markers including immune and inflammatory factors predict outcomes in patients receiving postoperative radiation therapy for cholangiocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze treatment outcomes and prognostic markers, including immune and inflammatory factors, of postoperative radiation therapy (RT) administered to patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). METHODS: We retrospectively included 59 patients with CCA who underwent surgery and postoperative RT with curative intent from 2004 to 2019. Patients received external irradiation (50 Gy in 25 fractions) using three-dimensional RT. We analyzed prognostic factors of inflammation, such as pre-RT platelet count, hemoglobin, lymphocyte count ratio (LCR) of the leukocyte count, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). RESULTS: Tumor stages were distributed as follows: I (n = 8), II (n = 25), III (n = 15), and IVA (n = 11). The median follow-up was 24 months. Two-year overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), and locoregional control (LRC) rates were 59.5%, 62.0%, 40.1%, and 66.7%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that lower LCR was significantly associated with shorter PFS (p = 0.0446). There was no significant difference between the median baseline values of PLR and NLR; and age ≥75, positive regional lymph node metastases (N+), and chemotherapy after RT were significantly associated with poor OS. Multivariate analysis revealed a significant association of N+ with worse OS, PFS, and CSS and that lower LCR was significantly associated with better PFS (p = 0.0234). Among late toxicity events, two patients (3.38%) were suspected with therapy-related liver toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Lower LCR before RT was a better prognostic factor for postoperative RT of patients with CCA.

Radiation-Induced Peripheral Artery Disease in a 63-Year-Old Patient.

Tobacco use, hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia are known risk factors for peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, additional causes of PAD, such as radiation therapy, should be considered for the prevention and diagnosis of this disease. The patient described in this report had 36 radiation therapies directly to the pelvis and bladder area due to bladder cancer. The presence of severe PAD on this patient's right external iliac artery, the same area where he received radiation therapy, raises the question of whether radiation therapy contributed to the development of PAD. In addition, his history of anal intraepithelial neoplasia, obstructive uropathy, and chronic kidney disease further demonstrated that he possibly suffered extensive tissue damage due to radiation to the pelvis. This case report explores the current diagnosis guidelines and treatment options for patients with radiation-induced PAD. Through this case study, we aim to bring awareness to this lesser-known cause of PAD among medical providers and promote research for the prevention and treatment of this disease.