Short-term outcomes in robotic vs laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery: a propensity score match study.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery offers improved short-term outcomes over open surgery but can be technically challenging. Robotic surgery has been increasingly used for IPAA surgery, but there is limited evidence supporting its use. This study aims to compare the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic IPAA procedures. METHODS: All consecutive patients receiving laparoscopic and robotic IPAA surgery at 3 centres, from 3 countries, between 2008 and 2019 were identified from prospectively collated databases. Robotic surgery patients were propensity score matched with laparoscopic patients for gender, previous abdominal surgery, ASA grade (I, II vs III, IV) and procedure performed (proctocolectomy vs completion proctectomy). Their short-term outcomes were examined. RESULTS: A total of 89 patients were identified (73 laparoscopic, 16 robotic). The 16 patients that received robotic surgery were matched with 15 laparoscopic patients. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in any of the investigated short-term outcomes. Length of stay trend was higher for laparoscopic surgery (9 vs 7 days, p = 0.072) CONCLUSION: Robotic IPAA surgery is safe and feasible and offers similar short-term outcomes to laparoscopic surgery. Length of stay may be lower for robotic IPAA surgery, but further larger scale studies are required in order to demonstrate this.

A step-by-step guide to ileoanal J-pouch MRI interpretation.

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary management of patients with an ileoanal pouch requires dedicated imaging to identify structural problems of the pouch associated with dysfunction. The purpose of this study is to provide a framework for interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the ileoanal pouch to enable surgeons and radiologists to work cohesively, optimise diagnosis and ultimately improve patient care. METHODS: We propose a protocol for structured MRI assessment of the ileal pouch, aiming to provide surgeons a systematic report of the anatomy, its variations and pouch complications. This guide consists of studying the characteristics of the bowel, mesentery and anal canal. RESULTS: The presented checklist is designed to systematically interpret and identify abnormalities of the ileoanal pouch on MRI. It focuses on the characteristics of the bowel (encompassing pre-pouch ileum, pouch and rectal cuff), mesentery and anal canal. The different elements of the checklist are presented in the associated supplementary video. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of clinical assessment, endoscopic evaluations and imaging is fundamental to achieving accurate diagnosis of ileoanal pouch surgery complications and pouch dysfunction.

Classification of surgical causes of and approaches to the chronically failing ileoanal pouch.

BACKGROUND: Although there are various surgical causes of and therapeutic approaches to the chronically failing ileoanal pouch (PF), cases are often detailed without distinguishing the exact cause and corresponding treatment. The aim of our study was to classify causes of PF and corresponding surgical treatment options, and to establish efficacy of surgical approach per cause. METHODS: This retrospective study included all consecutive adult patients with chronic PF surgically treated at our tertiary hospital between July 2014 and March 2021. Patients were classified according to a proposed sub-classification for surgical related chronic PF. Results were reported accordingly. RESULTS: A total of 59 procedures were completed in 50 patients (64% male, median age 45 years [IQR 34.5-54.3]) for chronic PF. Most patients had refractory ulcerative colitis as indication for their restorative proctocolectomy (68%). All patients could be categorized according to the sub-classification. Reasons for chronic PF were septic complications (n = 25), pouch body complications (n = 12), outlet problems (n = 11), cuff problems (n = 8), retained rectum (n = 2), and inlet problems (n = 1). For these indications, 17 pouches were excised, 10 pouch reconstructions were performed, and 32 pouch revision procedures were performed. The various procedures had different complication rates. Technical success rates of redo surgery for the different causes varied from 0 to 100%, with a 75% success rate for septic causes. CONCLUSIONS: Our sub-classification for chronic PF and corresponding treatments is suitable for all included patients. Outcomes varied between causes and subsequent management. Chronic PF was predominantly caused by septic complications with redo surgery achieving a 75% technical success rate.

Revisional ileoanal pouch surgery: a systematic literature review assessing outcomes over the last 40 years.

AIM: Failure of primary ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) occurs in up to 15% of patients. Revision surgery may be offered to patients wishing to maintain gastrointestinal continuity. This paper explores the literature relating to IPAA revision surgery, focusing on pouch function after revision and factors associated with pouch failure. METHODS: Search of PubMed database was carried out for 'ileal pouch anal anastomoses', 'ileoanal pouch', 'restorative proctocolectomy', 'revision surgery', 'redo surgery', 'failure', 'refashion surgery', 'reconstruction surgery' and 'salvage surgery'. Papers were screened using the PRISMA literature review strategy. Studies of adults published after 1980 in English with an available abstract were included. Case reports and studies that were superseded using the same data were excluded. RESULTS: Nineteen papers (1424 patients) were identified. Bowel motion frequency doubled following revision surgery compared to primary IPAA although the increase was not always statistically significant. In patients failing primary IPAA, frequency of daytime bowel motions improved following revision in three studies but only reached significance in one (12.1 vs. 6.9, P = 0.021). Risk of pouch failure is increased in patients who develop pelvic sepsis after the primary procedure with the largest study demonstrating a four-fold increased risk (hazard ratio 3.691, P < 0.0001). A final diagnosis of Crohn's causes a four-fold increased risk of pouch failure (n = 81; OR 3.92, 95% CI 1.1-15.9, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing revisional surgery, improved outcomes are observed but are inferior compared to primary IPAA patients. Pelvic sepsis after primary IPAA and a final diagnosis of Crohn's are associated with increased risk of pouch failure.

Redo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: outcomes from a case-controlled study.

AIM: To assess short- and long-term outcomes of redo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (redo-IPAA) for failed IPAA, comparing them with those of successful IPAA. METHOD: This was a case-control study. Data were collected retrospectively from prospectively maintained databases from two tertiary care centres. Patients who had a redo-IPAA between 1999 and 2016 were identified and matched (1:2) with patients who had a primary IPAA (p-IPAA), according to diagnosis, age and body mass index. RESULTS: Thirty-nine redo-IPAAs (16 transanal and 23 abdominal procedures) were identified, and were matched with 78 p-IPAAs. After a mean follow-up of 56 ± 51  (2.6-190) months, failure rates after transanal and abdominal approaches were 50% and 15%, respectively. Reoperation after the transanal approach was higher than after p-IPAA (69% vs 7%; P < 0.001). No differences were noted between the abdominal approach for redo-IPAA and p-IPAA in terms of morbidity (61% for redo-IPAA vs 38% for p-IPAA; P = 0.06), major morbidity (9% vs 8%; P = 0.96), anastomotic leakage (13% vs 10%; P = 0.74), mean daily bowel movements (6 vs 5.5; P = 0.68), night-time bowel movements (1.2 vs 1; P = 0.51), faecal incontinence (13% vs 7%; P = 0.40), urgency (31% vs 27%; P = 0.59), use of anti-diarrhoeal drugs (47% vs 37%; P = 0.70), mean Cleveland Global Quality-of-Life score (7 vs 7; P = 0.83) or sexual function. CONCLUSION: The abdominal approach for redo-IPAA is justified in cases of pouch failure because it achieves functional results comparable with those observed after p-IPAA, without higher postoperative morbidity. The transanal approach should be chosen sparingly.

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with fluorescence angiography: a case-matched study.

AIM: An anastomotic leak in ileoanal pouch surgery may lead to pouch failure. Constructing a tension-free ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) reduces this risk but can be technically challenging, balancing pouch vascularization with ileal mesenteric length and site of vessel ligation. Fluorescence angiography (FA) may help the clinician make a more balanced judgement. METHODS: Thirty-two patients undergoing minimally invasive completion proctectomy with FA-guided IPAA at two academic centres were matched and compared on a 1:1 basis to a historical group undergoing the same procedure without the use of this technique. RESULTS: Ligation of the ileocolic vessels was safely performed in 15/32 (47%) of FA patients compared with 5/32 (16%) of historical controls. One patient underwent intra-operative IPAA reconstruction after FA detected ischaemia. No anastomotic leak occurred with FA but there was only one in the historical controls (P = 0.31). The postoperative complication rate was similar between the two groups (P = 0.60). CONCLUSION: FA is applicable to IPAA surgery and may help to reduce perfusion-related anastomotic leaks. A prospective randomized trial is warranted.

Outcome of restorative proctocolectomy with an ileo-anal pouch for ulcerative colitis: effect of changes in clinical practice.

AIM: Surgery for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has evolved over time, especially since the introduction of laparoscopy. The aim of this retrospective study was to report the impact of surgical evolution on outcome over a period of 25 years. METHOD: All patients who had IPAA surgery for ulcerative colitis from 1990 to 2015 at the University Hospitals of Leuven were included. Patients were divided into three period arms (period A 1990-1999; period B 2000-2009; period C 2010-2015). The main outcome measure was anastomotic leakage. RESULTS: A total of 335 patients (58.8% male) with a median age of 39 years (interquartile range 32-49 years) at surgery were included. Median follow-up was 5 years (interquartile range 2-10 years). Overall anastomotic leakage (grades A-C) was 14.9%. A significant decrease in leakage rate was observed over time (from 21.4% in period A to 12.1% in period B to 10.0% in period C; P = 0.04). The defunctioning ileostomy rate at the time of pouch construction decreased from 91.7% (period A) to 40.3% (period B) to 11.1% (period C) (P < 0.001). We observed an increase in the use of laparoscopy (23.9% in period A vs 72.6% in period B, vs 84.4% in period C; P = 0.001) and a shift to a modified two-stage procedure (4.1% in period A, vs 66.7% in period C; P < 0.0001). In a monocentric study with some of the data retrieved retrospectively it was not possible to account for the impact of preoperative nutritional status (weight loss, serum albumin level) or disease burden. Other outcome factors were not measured, for example sexual function and fecundity. CONCLUSION: A higher rate of laparoscopic IPAA surgery, together with a shift towards modified two-stage procedures, was associated with a lower leakage rate despite a reduction in the use of defunctioning ileostomy.

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a Canadian institution's experience.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to summarize the outcomes of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients receiving an ileal pouch-anal anastamosis (IPAA) over an 11-year period at a high-volume Canadian inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) center. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for subjects with UC who underwent IPAA between 2002 and 2013. Patient charts were reviewed for demographic data, clinical characteristics, preoperative medical treatment, and surgical outcomes. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression modeling were used to determine significant factors in postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty-eight were included from the IBD database. The median age at the time of surgery was 37.1 (±12.1). Mean preoperative disease duration was 8.1 years (±8.7). Three hundred sixty-nine patients (48.7 %) had systemic corticosteroids (>15 mg/day) within 30 days prior to surgery. Of these, 286 patients had high dose (>30 mg/day) corticosteroids within 7 days of their first surgery. One hundred nine (14.0 %) IPAA procedures were performed laparoscopically. Pelvic pouches were created in traditional 2 (n = 460) and 3 (n = 285) stages; the remainder (n = 13) was performed in non-traditional staged operations. Early complications, defined as occurring within the same stay in hospital, consisted of pelvic abscess (n = 135, 17.8 %), small bowel obstruction (n = 134, 17.7 %), wound infection (n = 108, 14.3 %), and deep vein thrombosis (n = 33, 4.4 %). The overall pouch leak rate was 92 (12.1 %). There was one death in our study. The median length of stay was 10.3 days (SD6.0). Late complications, defined as occurring after discharge from hospital, consisted of anal stricture (n = 55, 7.3 %), pouch fistula (n = 26, 3.4 %), and functional pouch failure (n = 7, 0.9 %). CONCLUSIONS: IPAA has been found to be a safe and effective method of surgical management of UC patients in a high-volume IBD center.

Routine placement of abdominal drainage in pouch surgery does not impact on surgical outcomes.

The evidence does not support the routine use of abdominal drainage (AD) in colorectal surgery. However, there is no data on the usefulness of AD, specifically, after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). The aim of this study is to assess post-operative outcomes of patients undergoing IPAA with or without AD at a high volume referral center. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients undergoing IPAA with AD (AD group) or without AD (NAD group) was performed. Baseline characteristics, operative, and postoperative data were analyzed and compared between the two groups. A total of 97 patients were included in the analysis, 46 were in AD group and 51 in NAD group. AD group had a higher BMI (23.9 ± 3.9 kg/m2 vs 21.9 ± 3.0 kg/m2; p = 0.007) and more commonly underwent two-stage proctocolectomy with IPAA compared to the NAD group (50.0% vs 3.9%; p < 0.001). There was no difference in anastomotic leak rate (6.5% AD vs 5.9% NAD group; p = 1.000), major post-operative complication (8.6% vs 7.9%; p = 0.893); median length of stay [IQR] (5 [5-7] days vs 5 [4-7] days; p = 0.305) and readmission < 90 days (8.7% vs 3.9%; p = 0.418). The use of AD does not impact on surgical outcome after IPAA and question the actual benefit of its routine placement.

Restorative pouch surgery following proctocolectomy for inflammatory bowel disease: past experience and future direction.

Major advancements in surgery for patients suffering proctocolitis from ulcerative colitis (UC) or selected patients with Crohn's disease (CD) have emerged in a relatively short time. Historically, patients underwent a proctocolectomy with end ileostomy, however, a restorative proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) was introduced in the late 1970s in the United Kingdom and gave patients the opportunity to avoid a permanent stoma. Initially designed as a hand-sewn "S" shaped pouch, with the invention of the linear stapler, a "J" shaped pouch was described in Japan, and subsequent advances in the United States largely contributed to the pelvic pouch's evolution to the standard of care in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The procedure was then divided into different stages depending on the medical condition of the patient and minimally invasive techniques (laparoscopic & robotic surgery) have continued to advance the success of the operation. Unfortunately, pouch complications occur, and seem to be occurring at an increasing frequency with the adoption of minimally invasive surgery. The field of reoperative pouch surgery has emerged to offer patients the opportunity to restore their quality of life (QOL) without the need for a permanent ostomy. Many patients with signs of pouch failure such as pouchitis, fistulae, pain and obstruction are diagnosed with Crohn's of the pouch, but many have mechanical complications that can be corrected with surgery, rather than offering pouch excision with a permanent ostomy (continent or traditional). Patients with Crohn's may be offered an IPAA but they will not have success if they, like patients with UC, have mechanical complications leading to their pouch failure. Patients who undergo reoperative pouch surgery do well with an acceptable QOL.

Loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective comparison of three techniques.

BACKGROUND: Loop ileostomy (LI) formation is a common practice for patients undergoing low anterior resection or restorative ileo-anal pouch surgery. Ileostomy closure can be performed using a stapled or hand-sewn technique, with or without resection. If hand-sewn, the closure can be one or two layers. Randomized controlled trials have not demonstrated one technique to be superior, and meta-analyses are limited by the heterogeneity of published studies. Our primary aim is to compare stapled ileostomy closure with single- and two-layer hand-sewn closures. METHODS: This retrospective, single-centre cohort study included patients undergoing LI closure between January 1999 and April 2016. Patient demographics, anastomotic technique, operative time and patient outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Our analysis included 244 patients (median age 67 years, 43.4% female). There were no significant differences in mean operative times (71.5, 73.1 and 88.5 min, for stapled, single- and two-layer hand-sewn closures, respectively, adjusted overall P = 0.262), or morbidity (21.5% versus 20.4% versus 17.6%, adjusted overall P = 0.934) between stapled or hand-sewn anastomoses, and no mortality. Once adjusting for age, sex, American College of Anaesthesiology grade, and consultant surgeon, the length of stay was different (overall P = 0.034), being similar between stapled and single-layer closures (4.2 versus 5.5 days, P = 0.105), but significantly different between stapled and two-layer closures (4.2 versus 8.3 days, P = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Stapled and single-layered hand-sewn closures are similar in length of procedure, length of stay and complication rates. A two-layer, hand-sewn technique is associated with a significant increase in stay compared to a stapled ileostomy closure.

Anti-TNF and Pouch Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis: The Ones who Blame for More Complications?

Since the approval in 2005 of anti-TNF drugs for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, concerns have been raised about the potential detrimental effect of these agents on postoperative infectious complications related to pouch surgery. Data on this topic are controversial and mostly derived from retrospective underpowered cohort studies largely affected by relevant bias. Three meta-analyses have been published with contradictory results. Moreover, the correlation between serum levels of infliximab at the time of surgery and the occurrence of septic postoperative complication is far to be proven and remains an answered research question. The construction of an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) as first surgical step in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) refractory to medical treatment seems to be associated with an increased risk of septic complications. Population-based data from the United States show a shift towards stage surgery for patients with refractory UC as a consequence of the widespread use of biological agents and the increased tendency to consider surgery as ultimate resort (step-up approach). In this setting, the classic 3-stage procedure (ileoanal pouch and diversion ileostomy after initial total colectomy) together with the modified 2-stage approach (ileoanal pouch without diversion ileostomy after initial total colectomy) are both effective options. Whether or not a diversion ileostomy could prevent pouch complications at the time of the pouch construction during the second stage of surgery is still a matter of debate. Emerging data seem to claim for increased risk of small bowel obstructions related to the presence of a stoma without proven effect on the prevention of anastomotic leak.

Mesenteric lengthening in pouch surgery: review of surgical techniques

Described for the first time in themedical literature in 1978 by Parks and Nicholls, total proctocolectomy with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) is nowadays the procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis inwhom themedical therapy has, a selected group of patients with Crohń s disease, and for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Despite the advances in medical treatment regarding inflammatory bowel disease, up to 30% of patients still require surgery, and restorative proctocolectomy and IPAA are the mainstay of the surgical treatment. It is considered a demanding and technically-challenging procedure, with the main challenge being the performance of a tension-free IPAA; the main reason for failure of the tension-free anastomosis is a shortened mesentery. With particular attention to detail, sufficient length can be achieved to enable a safe anastomosis in most patients. Herein, we describe the available techniques to lengthen the mesentery of the ileal pouch to perform an easyto- reach tension-free anastomosis. (AU)

Ileo-anal pouch surgery in a district general hospital results in good outcomes and high patient satisfaction.

INTRODUCTION: Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) is a technically challenging procedure. This study aims to review the outcomes following surgery carried out in a DGH by two surgeons with experience gained in tertiary centres. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing RPC with IPAA were identified from a prospectively collected database and case notes reviewed. Data were collected on demographics, indication for surgery, operative details, outcomes and adherence to a treatment and follow-up protocol developed with a specialist centre. A validated questionnaire (the Pouch Functional Score) was sent to patients to assess functional outcome. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (nine male) underwent surgery from 2008 to 2012, average age 32 years (range 22-48). Median follow up was 5 years (interquartile range 3.2 years). The indication for surgery was ulcerative colitis. All patients had a 'J' shaped pouch, stapled anastomosis and defunctioning ileostomy. There was no operative mortality. One patient was re-admitted with high ileostomy output; three developed wound infections. All patients have had their stomas closed. There were no postoperative cases of pelvic sepsis or anastomotic leak. The median stool frequency is 6-8/24hrs, 23% of patients reported urgency, 23% had occasional incontinence. The protocol was adhered to in all cases. One patient required defunctioning of the pouch 5 years after surgery. CONCLUSION: With good patient selection, a team approach and a protocol ensuring consistent care, pouch surgery is being performed to a high standard in a DGH setting. Follow-up care is provided locally and patients have easy access to the multidisciplinary team.

Diet of patients after pouch surgery may affect pouch inflammation.

AIM: To investigate the diet of pouch patients compared to healthy controls, and to correlate pouch patients' diet with disease behavior. METHODS: Pouch patients were recruited and prospectively followed-up at the Comprehensive Pouch Clinic at the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center. Pouch behavior was determined based on clinical, endoscopic and histological criteria. Healthy age- and sex-matched volunteers were selected from the "MABAT" Israeli Nutrition and Public Health Governmental Study and served as the control group. All the participants completed a 106-item food frequency questionnaire categorized into food groups and nutritional values based on those used in the United States Department of Agriculture food pyramid and the Israeli food pyramid. Data on Dietary behavior, food avoidance, the use of nutritional supplements, physical activity, smoking habits, and body-mass index (BMI) were also obtained. Pouch patients who had familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 3), irritable pouch syndrome (n = 4), or patients whose pouch surgery took place less than one year previously (n = 5) were excluded from analysis. RESULTS: The pouch patients (n = 80) consumed significantly more from the bakery products food group (1.2 ± 1.4 servings/d vs 0.6 ± 1.1 servings/d, P < 0.05) and as twice as many servings from the oils and fats (4.8 ± 3.4 servings/d vs 2.4 ± 2 servings/d, P < 0.05), and the nuts and seeds food group (0.3 ± 0.6 servings/d vs 0.1 ± 0.4 servings/d, P < 0.05) compared to the controls (n = 80). The pouch patients consumed significantly more total fat (97.6 ± 40.5 g/d vs 84.4 ± 39 g/d, P < 0.05) and fat components [monounsaturated fatty acids (38.4 ± 16.4 g/d vs 30 ± 14 g/d, P < 0.001), and saturated fatty acids (30 ± 15.5 g/d vs 28 ± 14.1 g/d, P < 0.00)] than the controls. In contrast, the pouch patients consumed significantly fewer carbohydrates (305.5 ± 141.4 g/d vs 369 ± 215.2 g/d, P = 0.03), sugars (124 ± 76.2 g/d vs 157.5 ± 90.4 g/d, P = 0.01), theobromine (77.8 ± 100 mg/d vs 236.6 ± 244.5 mg/d, P < 0.00), retinol (474.4 ± 337.1 µg/d vs 832.4 ± 609.6 µg/d, P < 0.001) and dietary fibers (26.2 ± 15.4 g/d vs 30.7 ± 14 g/d, P = 0.05) than the controls. Comparisons of the food consumption of the patients without (n = 23) and with pouchitis (n = 45) showed that the former consumed twice as many fruit servings as the latter (3.6 ± 4.1 servings/d vs 1.8 ± 1.7 servings/d, respectively, P < 0.05). In addition, the pouchitis patients consumed significantly fewer liposoluble antioxidants, such as cryptoxanthin (399 ± 485 µg/d vs 890.1 ± 1296.8 µg/d, P < 0.05) and lycopene (6533.1 ± 6065.7 µg/d vs 10725.7 ± 10065.9 µg/d, P < 0.05), and less vitamin A (893.3 ± 516 µg/d vs 1237.5 ± 728 µg/d, P < 0.05) and vitamin C (153.3 ± 130 mg/d vs 285.3 ± 326.3 mg/d, P < 0.05) than the patients without pouchitis. The mean BMI of the pouchitis patients was significantly lower than the BMI of the patients with a normal pouch: 22.6 ± 3.2 vs 27 ± 4.9 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Decreased consumption of antioxidants by patients with pouchitis may expose them to the effects of inflammatory and oxidative stress and contribute to the development of pouchitis.

Technical aspects of ileoanal pouch surgery in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis requiring surgery. A J-pouch with a stapled anastomosis has been the preferred technique because it is quicker, safer, and associated with good functional outcomes. A diverting loop ileostomy is usually created at the time of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. In patients with severe fulminant colitis or toxic megacolon, restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is performed in multistages. The technical aspects of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis are reviewed in this article.

Successful treatment for pouchitis with rebamipide refractory to a combination of metronidazole (MNZ) and ciprofloxacin (CFX).

A 35-year-old male who had undergone proctocolectomy and ileo-anal pouch surgery (IPAA) because of ulcerative colitis presented with worsening diarrhea and hematochezia. Pouchitis was diagnosed, and he was prescribed with metronidazole (MNZ) and a betamethasone enema. However, his condition did not remarkably improve despite these strategies. Endoscopy revealed ulceration and inflammation in the ileal pouch together with contact bleeding and mucous discharge. He underwent granulocytapheresis (G-CAP) and was prescribed anal 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) and oral prednisolone. Oral azathioprine (AZA) and a combination of MNZ and ciprofloxacin (CFX) did not result in any improvement. He was then treated with rebamipide enemas twice daily for 8 weeks without additional drug therapy. Two weeks thereafter, stool frequency started to decrease, fecal hemoglobin became negative, and his symptoms gradually improved. Endoscopic findings after the rebamipide therapy showed that the ulcers in the ileal pouch had mostly healed without obvious inflammation and bleeding. Rebamipide was thus maintained throughout the therapeutic period and for 13 months of follow-up. Rebamipide effectively treated severe pouchitis that was refractory to intensive conventional medication including antibiotics and corticosteroids.