Female obesity increases the risk of preterm birth of single frozen-thawed euploid embryos: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity has been associated with an increased risk of reproductive failure, especially preterm birth. As preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) is increasingly used worldwide, however, it is still unclear whether body mass index (BMI) has an effect on the preterm birth rate in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with PGT-A when transferring a single euploid blastocyst. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included 851 women who underwent the first cycle of frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer with PGT-A between 2015 and 2020. The primary outcome was the preterm birth rate. Secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, pregnancy complications, and live birth. RESULTS: Patients were grouped by World Health Organization (WHO) BMI class: underweight (<18.5, n = 81), normal weight (18.5-24.9, n = 637), overweight (25-30, n = 108), and obese (≥30, n = 25). There was no difference in the clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, pregnancy complication, and live birth by BMI category. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, preterm birth rates were significantly higher in women with overweight (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-7.80, p = .012) and obese (aOR 1.49; 95% CI, 1.03-12.78, p = .027) compared with the normal weight reference group. CONCLUSION: Women with obesity experience a higher rate of preterm birth after euploid embryo transfer than women with a normal weight, suggesting that the negative impact of obesity on IVF and clinical outcomes may be related to other mechanisms than aneuploidy.

Embryo drop-out rates in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a retrospective data analysis from the DoLoRes study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the decline in transferable embryos in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles due to (a) non-biopsable blastocyst quality, (b) failure of genetic analysis, (c) diagnosis of uniform numerical or structural chromosomal aberrations, and/or (d) chromosomal aberrations in mosaic constitution. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study comprised outcomes of 1562 blastocysts originating from 363 controlled ovarian stimulation cycles, respectively, 226 IVF couples in the period between January 2016 and December 2018. Inclusion criteria were PGT-A cycles with trophectoderm biopsy (TB) and next generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS: Out of 1562 blastocysts, 25.8% were lost due to non-biopsable and/or non-freezable embryo quality. In 10.3% of all biopsied blastocysts, genetic analysis failed. After exclusion of embryos with uniform or chromosomal aberrations in mosaic, only 18.1% of those originally yielded remained as diagnosed euploid embryos suitable for transfer. This translates into 50.4% of patients and 57.6% of stimulated cycles with no euploid embryo left for transfer. The risk that no transfer can take place rose significantly with a lower number of oocytes and with increasing maternal age. The chance for at least one euploid blastocyst/cycle in advanced maternal age (AMA)-patients was 33.3% compared to 52.1% in recurrent miscarriage (RM), 59.8% in recurrent implantation failure (RIF), and 60.0% in severe male factor (SMF). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that PGT-A is accompanied by high embryo drop-out rates. IVF-practitioners should be aware that their patients run a high risk of ending up without any embryo suitable for transfer after (several) stimulation cycles, especially in AMA patients. Patients should be informed in detail about the frequency of inconclusive or mosaic results, with the associated risk of not having an euploid embryo available for transfer after PGT-A, as well as the high cost involved in this type of testing.

PGT-M for spinocerebellar ataxia type 1: development of a STR panel and a report of two clinical cases.

PURPOSE: To present the developed preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 (SCA1) and the outcomes of IVF with PGT. METHODS: PGT was performed for two unrelated couples from the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) with the risk of SCA1 in one spouse. We have developed a system for PGT of a monogenic disease (PGT-M) for SCA1, which includes the analysis of a panel of 11 polymorphic STR markers linked to the ATXN1 gene and a pathogenic variant of the ATXN1 gene using nested PCR and fragment analysis. IVF/ICSI programs were performed according to standard protocols. Multiple displacement amplification (MDA) was used for whole genome amplification (WGA) and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for aneuploidy testing (PGT-A). RESULTS: Eight STRs were informative for the first couple and ten for the second. Similarity of the haplotypes carrying pathogenic variants of the ATXN1 gene was noted. In the first case, during IVF/ICSI-PGT, three embryos reached the blastocyst stage and were biopsied. One embryo was diagnosed as normal by maternal STR haplotype and the ATXN1 allele. PGT-A revealed euploidy. The embryo transfer resulted in a singleton pregnancy, and a healthy boy was born. Postnatal diagnosis confirmed normal ATXN1. In the second case, two blastocysts were biopsied. Both were diagnosed as normal by PGT-M, but PGT-A revealed aneuploidy. CONCLUSION: Birth of a healthy child after PGT for SCA1 was the first case of successful preimplantation prevention of SCA1 for the Yakut couple and the first case of successful PGT for SCA1 in Russia.

Previously reported and here added cases demonstrate euploid pregnancies followed by PGT-A as "mosaic" as well as "aneuploid" designated embryos.

BACKGROUND: After the longest time opposing all transfers of embryos by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) diagnosed as "chromosomal-abnormal," the field has over recent years slowly been moving toward selective transfers of by PGT-A as "mosaic" diagnosed embryos, but is still rejecting transfers of embryos by PGT-A defined as "aneuploid." METHODS: Upon review of the literature, we report published cases of euploid pregnancies following transfers of PGT-A as "aneuploid" diagnosed embryos and add several additional, ongoing cases at our center. RESULTS: Among the published cases from our center, we identified seven euploid pregnancies from "aneuploid" embryos, four of which preceded the PGT-A industry's 2016 switch from binary "euploid" - "aneuploid" reporting to "euploid," "mosaic," and "aneuploid" reporting. That those four cases post 2016 PGT-A definition involving "mosaic" embryos, therefore, cannot be ruled out. Since then, we recently established three additional ongoing pregnancies from transfers of "aneuploid" embryos which still await confirmation of euploidy after delivery. A recent fourth pregnancy from the transfer of a trisomy 9 embryo miscarried before a fetal heart. Outside our own center's experience, the literature revealed only one additional such transfer, involving PGT-A as a "chaotic-aneuploid" diagnosed embryo with six abnormalities, leading to normal euploid delivery. In reviewing the literature, we furthermore demonstrate why current PGT-A reporting that differentiates between "mosaic" and "aneuploid" embryos based on relative percentages of euploid and aneuploid DNA in a single trophectoderm biopsy of on average 5-6 cells, is biologically non-sensical. CONCLUSION: Basic biological evidence and a clinically still very limited experience with transfers of PGT-A as "aneuploid" labeled embryos demonstrate beyond reasonable doubt that at least some "aneuploid" embryos can lead to healthy euploid births. Therefore, this observation establishes beyond reasonable doubt that the rejection of all "aneuploid" embryos from transfer reduces pregnancy and live birth chances for IVF patients. Whether (and to what possible degree) pregnancy and live birth chances differ between "mosaic" and "aneuploid" embryos, remains to be determined. The answer will likely depend on the aneuploidy(ies) of an embryo and to what degree percentages of "mosaicism" in a single, on average 5/6-cell trophectoderm biopsy can reflect the ploidy-status of a complete embryo.

Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) protocol yields lower euploidy rate in older patients undergoing IVF.

BACKGROUND: To explore if exogenous progestin required for progestin primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol compromises the euploidy rate of patients who underwent preimplantation genetic testing cycles when compared to those who received the conventional gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 128 preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles performed from January 2018 to December 2021 in a single university hospital-affiliated fertility center. Infertile women aged 27 to 45 years old requiring PGT-A underwent either PPOS protocol or GnRH-antagonist protocol with in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for fertilization. Frozen embryo transfers were performed following each PGT-A cycle. Data regarding the two groups were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). RESULTS: Patients who underwent PPOS treatment had significantly reduced blastocyst formation rate and euploidy rate compared to those who received the GnRH antagonist protocol. Subgroup-analysis was performed by stratifying patients' age into elder and young subgroups (elder: ≥ 38-year-old, young: < 38-year-old). In the elder sub-population, the blastocyst formation rate of the PPOS group was significantly lower than that of the GnRH-antagonist group (45.8 ± 6.1% vs. 59.9 ± 3.8%, p = 0.036). Moreover, the euploidy rate of the PPOS group was only about 20% of that of  the GnRH-antagonist group (5.4% and 26.7%, p = 0.006). In contrast, no significant differences in blastocyst formation rate (63.5 ± 5.7% vs. 67.1 ± 3.2%, p = 0.45) or euploidy rate (30.1% vs. 38.5%, p = 0.221) were observed in the young sub-population. Secondary outcomes, which included implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, and miscarriage rate, were comparable between the two treatment groups, regardless of age. CONCLUSION: When compared to the conventional GnRH-antagonist approach, PPOS protocol could potentially reduce the euploidy rate in aging IVF patients. However, due to the retrospective nature of this study, the results are to be interpreted with caution. Before the PPOS protocol is widely implemented, further studies exploring its efficacy in larger populations are needed to define the optimal patient selection suitable for this method. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Human Investigation and Ethical Committee of Chang Gung Medical Foundation (202200194B0).

Effect of accessibility of a genetic counselor on uptake of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and carrier screening for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization.

This retrospective cohort study assessed the accessibility of a genetic counselor on uptake of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and carrier screening in a single academic Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility (REI) clinic. A total of 420 patients were evaluated with 219 patients counseled by a REI physician only and 201 patients after the addition of a genetic counselor (GC) to the REI clinic team. Cycles initiated before hiring of a GC (pre-GC) were assessed from June 2018 to December 2018 and after integration of a GC (post-GC) from March 2019 to August 2019. Additionally, information regarding carrier screening was collected if available in the medical record. Results showed more patients utilized PGT-A post-GC (9.5% vs. 5.5%), although the difference between groups did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.12). Individuals who were screened post-GC or who started screening pre-GC and continued screening post-GC were screened for a larger number of conditions than if they were only screened pre-GC (median pre-GC = 3, post-GC = 27, pre- and post-GC = 274; p < 0.0001). The change in practice from using physician-only counseling to counseling with accessibility to a GC did not change the utilization of PGT-A in a single clinic.

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: helpful but not a first choice.

PURPOSE: This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess and compare the outcomes between cumulative live birth of patients with and without PGT-A and also between prior unsuccessful IVF cycles and PGT-A cycles among patients who experienced IVF but without live birth delivery, and to clarify the effective usage of PGT-A as an in vitro fertilization (IVF) add-on. METHODS: A total of 2113 females undergoing IVF with at least one blastocyst were reviewed. Patients in the PGT-A and non-PGT-A groups were further categorized into first-time IVF and prior unsuccessful IVF groups (previous IVF experience but without live birth delivery). RESULTS: In the PGT-A group, there were additional oocyte retrieval cycles, fewer transfer cycles per patient, higher clinical pregnancy rates per embryo transfer, and lower miscarriage rates per clinical pregnancy as compared to the non-PGT-A group, all showing significant differences. However, the first-time IVF group with PGT-A had a significantly longer duration from the first oocyte retrieval to the first live birth delivery (LBD) and a significantly lower LBD rate per patient than the non-PGT-A group. The cumulative probability for a first LBD with PGT-A was inferior in the first-time IVF group for women < 35 years, marginally superior in the prior unsuccessful IVF group of women aged 38-40 years, and similar for other groups. CONCLUSION: PGT-A should not be recommended to all patients; however, if the first IVF treatment failed, PGT-A may reduce the patient's burden regardless of age.

Association of embryo aneuploidy and sperm DNA damage in unexplained recurrent implantation failure patients under NGS-based PGT-A cycles.

PURPOSE: Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is one of the most common conditions affecting In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)/Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes. Aneuploidy embryos, one of the main types of embryos-related factors, was reported to be a major contributor to RIF. The present study aimed to examine the association between sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) and outcomes of next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in unexplained RIF patients. METHODS: This study analyzed 119 couples with unexplained RIF who underwent 119 PGT-A cycles between January, 2017 and March, 2022. The 119 males were divided into 3 groups according to their sperm DFI levels: Group1 (low, DFI ≤ 15%, n = 50), Group2 (medium, 15% < DFI < 30%, n = 41) and Group3 (high, DFI ≥ 30%, n = 28). Sperm DFI was measured by sperm chromatin structure analysis (SCSA) technique. Trophectoderm biopsy on day 5 or 6 were performed with NGS technique. The following outcomes of PGT-A were analyzed and compared: fertilization, good-quality embryos, aneuploidy rate, miscarriage, live birth and newborn defects. RESULTS: The component of aneuploidy embryos was significantly higher in high DFI group (42.71%) than that of medium group (28.39%) and low group (27.80%). The miscarriage rate of high DFI group (27.27%) and medium group (14.29%) is significantly higher than that of low group (0.00%). No significant differences were found regarding fertility, good-quality embryo rate, pregnancy rate, live birth rate or newborn defects among three groups. CONCLUSION: The sperm DNA damage is associated with blastocyst aneuploidy and miscarriage rate in unexplained RIF cases. Embryo selection by PGT-A and efforts to decrease sperm DFI before IVF/ICSI treatments should be considered for those male patients with high DFI.

IVF outcomes of embryos with abnormal PGT-A biopsy previously refused transfer: a prospective cohort study.

STUDY QUESTION: What are the outcomes for patients who choose to move embryos diagnosed as abnormal by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) to a new institution for transfer after the diagnosing institution refused to transfer them? SUMMARY ANSWER: Many patients seek to have selected embryos with PGT-A abnormal trophectoderm biopsies transferred recognizing that these embryos can still offer a chance of pregnancy and live birth. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: : PGT-A is a widely practiced method of selecting embryos for transfer based on biopsy of a few cells. Many clinical practices refuse to transfer PGT-A abnormal embryos even when there are no other 'normal' embryos available. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a prospective cohort of 69 couples who, since 2014, moved a total of 444 PGT-A abnormal embryos previously refused transfer at their parent institutions to our practice. Among these, 50 patients have, thus far, undergone 57 transfer cycles of 141 embryos. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Embryos diagnosed at other institutions by PGT-A as abnormal (mostly using next generation sequencing) were moved to our academically affiliated private fertility and research center in New York City. Female age at retrieval was 41.35 ± 3.98 years, 74% were Caucasian, 12% Asian and 10% were of African descent. All embryos identified as PGT-A abnormal among prospectively identified couples were recorded in our center's registry. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Among the 144 embryos transferred 102 (72.3%) had only 1 or 2 chromosomal abnormalities, 30 (21.3%) had 3 or more and 9 (6.4%) were 'undiagnosed' because of degraded DNA, yet still had been refused transfer. Transfer of PGT-A abnormal embryos resulted in 8 live births, 11 miscarriages and no voluntary terminations. One child was born with a segmental duplication and required repair of coarctation of the aorta as a newborn. Many couples with only PGT-A abnormal embryos are willing to have their PGT-A abnormal embryos transferred and such transfers can result in the establishment of ongoing euploid pregnancies and live births. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Findings in this case series represent couples who chose to have their embryos transferred after having been refused transfer elsewhere and may not be representative of the wider population of couples undergoing IVF with PGT-A in general. Not all abnormal phenotypes present in the immediate postnatal period so it will be important to continue to follow the development of these children. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: PGT-A can result in a clinics refusal to transfer embryos with abnormal PGT-A biopsies, even those with mosaic findings, consequently large numbers of infertile women are prematurely advised that their only chance of motherhood is through third-party egg-donation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by intramural funds from the Center for Human Reproduction and the not-for-profit research Foundation for Reproductive Medicine, both in New York, NY, USA. N.G. and D.H.B. are listed as co-inventors on several U.S. patents. One of these patents (US Patent# 7,615,544) relates to pre-supplementation of hypo-androgenic infertile women with androgens, such as DHEA and testosterone and, therefore, at least peripherally related to the subject of this manuscript. N.G. and D.F.A. also received travel funds and speaker honoraria from several pharmaceutical and medical device companies, though none related to the here presented subject and manuscript. N.G. is a shareholder in Fertility Nutraceuticals and he and D.H.B. receive royalty payments from Fertility Nutraceuticals LLC. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

The impact of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy on prenatal screening.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is associated with a reduced risk of abnormal conventional prenatal screening results in singleton pregnancies conceived using in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton IVF pregnancies conceived from a single tertiary care center between January 2014 and September 2019. Exclusion criteria included mosaic embryo transfers, vanishing twin pregnancies, and cycles with missing outcome data. Two cases of prenatally diagnosed aneuploidy that resulted in early voluntary terminations were also excluded. The primary outcome of abnormal first or second-trimester combined screening results was compared between two groups: pregnancy conceived after transfer of a euploid embryo by PGT-A vs. transfer of an untested embryo. Multivariable backwards-stepwise logistic regression with Firth method was used to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of the 419 pregnancies included, 208 (49.6%) were conceived after transfer of a euploid embryo by PGT-A, and 211 (50.4%) were conceived after transfer of an untested embryo. PGT-A was not associated with a lower likelihood of abnormal first-trimester (adjusted OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.82-3.39) or second-trimester screening results (adjusted OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.56-1.64). The incidences of cell-free DNA testing, fetal sonographic abnormalities, genetic counseling, and invasive prenatal diagnostic testing were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that PGT-A is not associated with a change in the likelihood of abnormal prenatal screening results or utilization of invasive prenatal diagnostic testing. Counseling this patient population regarding the importance of prenatal screening and prenatal diagnostic testing, where appropriate, remains essential.

Comparison of day 5 blastocyst with day 6 blastocyst: Evidence from NGS-based PGT-A results.

PURPOSE: Aneuploidy is one genetic factor leading to the failure of embryo implantation. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the day of embryo blastulation and the ploidy status of embryo, to aid in selecting embryos with the most likelihood of of being euploid in a noninvasive way. METHODS: This retrospective study recruited women undergoing preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for aneuploidy (PGT-A) with trophectoderm biopsy from January 2019 to December 2020. The ploidy status of embryos was determined by next-generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS: Altogether, 2531 blastocysts from 839 PGT-A cycles were evaluated. The euploid rate of day 5 blastocysts was significantly higher than that of day 6 blastocysts, either from the same ovarian stimulation (OS) cycles (49.9% vs 35.7%, P < 0.001) or from different OS cycles (48.2% vs 27.8%, P < 0.001). This effect of increasing time to embryo blastulation significantly reducing the prevalence of euploidy was not seen in women at age 38 or older. However, after single euploid embryo transfer, the clinical outcomes of day 5 blastocysts were comparable to those of day 6 blastocysts. CONCLUSIONS: In non-PGT cycles, our data support the selection of day 5 blastocysts for transfer over day 6 blastocysts. Further, women with poor ovarian reserve incline to obtain only day 6 blastocysts, and PGT-A is valuable for identifying the ploidy status of embryos, especially for those with advanced age. However, the stage of blastocysts will not affect the clinical outcome after transfer when they are identified as euploid.

Revisiting selected ethical aspects of current clinical in vitro fertilization (IVF) practice.

Ethical considerations are central to all medicine though, likely, nowhere more essential than in the practice of reproductive endocrinology and infertility. Through in vitro fertilization (IVF), this is the only field in medicine involved in creating human life. IVF has, indeed, so far led to close to 10 million births worldwide. Yet, relating to substantial changes in clinical practice of IVF, the medical literature has remained surprisingly quiet over the last two decades. Major changes especially since 2010, however, call for an updated commentary. Three key changes deserve special notice: Starting out as a strictly medical service, IVF in recent years, in efforts to expand female reproductive lifespans in a process given the term "planned" oocyte cryopreservation, increasingly became more socially motivated. The IVF field also increasingly underwent industrialization and commoditization by outside financial interests. Finally, at least partially driven by industrialization and commoditization, so-called add-ons, the term describing mostly unvalidated tests and procedures added to IVF since 2010, have been held responsible for worldwide declines in fresh, non-donor live birthrates after IVF, to levels not seen since the mid-1990s. We here, therefore, do not offer a review of bioethical considerations regarding IVF as a fertility treatment, but attempt to point out ethical issues that arose because of major recent changes in clinical IVF practice.

Commentary on two recently published formal guidelines on management of "mosaic" embryos after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).

Two professional societies recently published opinions on the clinical management of "mosaic" results from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in human blastocyst-stage embryos in associations with in vitro fertilization (IVF). We here point out three principal shortcomings: (i) Though a most recent societal opinion states that it should not be understood as an endorsement of the use of PGT-A, any discussion of how PGT-A should be clinically interpreted for all practical purposes does offer such an endorsement. (ii) The same guideline derived much of its opinion from a preceding guidance in favor of utilization of PGT-A that did not follow even minimal professional requirements for establishment of practice guidelines. (iii) Published guidelines on so-called "mosaic" embryos from both societies contradict basic biological characteristics of human preimplantation-stage embryos. They, furthermore, are clinically unvalidated and interpret results of a test, increasingly seen as harmful to IVF outcomes for many infertile women. Qualified professional organizations, therefore, should finally offer transparent guidelines about the utilization of PGT-A in association with IVF in general.

End-to-end deep learning for recognition of ploidy status using time-lapse videos.

PURPOSE: Our retrospective study is to investigate an end-to-end deep learning model in identifying ploidy status through raw time-lapse video. METHODS: By randomly dividing the dataset of time-lapse videos with known outcome of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), a deep learning model on raw videos was trained by the 80% dataset, and used to test the remaining 20%, by feeding time-lapse videos as input and the PGT-A prediction as output. The performance was measured by an average area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULT(S): With 690 sets of time-lapse video image, combined with PGT-A results, our deep learning model has achieved an AUC of 0.74 from the test dataset (138 videos), in discriminating between aneuploid embryos (group 1) and others (group 2, including euploid and mosaic embryos). CONCLUSION: Our model demonstrated a proof of concept and potential in recognizing the ploidy status of tested embryos. A larger scale and further optimization on the exclusion criteria would be included in our future investigation, as well as prospective approach.

Evidence-based clinical prioritization of embryos with mosaic results: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this review and meta-analysis is to standardize the practice of mosaic embryo transfer, based on the current available evidence. METHODS: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Relevant studies published were comprehensively selected using PubMed, Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL until 5 March 2021. Prospective and retrospective studies reporting the genetic analysis and clinical outcomes of mosaic embryo transfer were included. Risk of bias assessment was based on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the non-randomized studies. The primary and secondary outcomes were combined ongoing pregnancy and live birth rate and miscarriage rate, respectively. RESULTS: There were no differences between low and high mosaic embryos when a cut-off of 40% was used in terms of OP/LBR and SAB. However, low mosaics with a cut-off of 50% compared to high mosaics showed a significantly higher OP/LBR in the NGS but not in the a-CGH group, and a significantly lower risk of SAB. No differences were noted between mosaic monosomies versus trisomies and single versus double mosaics for both OP/LBR and SAB. Finally, segmental mosaics showed a higher OP/LBR and a lower SAB compared to whole chromosomes, and single and double mosaics had a higher OP/LBR compared to complex mosaics. CONCLUSIONS: A cut-off of 50% in defining low versus high mosaic embryos is preferable to a threshold of 40% when using NGS platform. No priority was established for mosaic trisomies over monosomies. Single and double mosaics must be preferred over complex mosaics and segmental mosaics must be preferred over whole chromosome mosaics. These results should be interpreted in the context of specific chromosomes involved in the mosaicism.

Development and clinical application of a preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease (PGT-M) for beta thalassemia in Vietnam.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this research is to study the clinical outcomes using a next-generation sequencing-based protocol allowing for simultaneous testing of mutations in the beta thalassemia (HBB) gene, including single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers for PGT-M along with low-pass whole genome analysis of chromosome aneuploidies for PGT-A. METHODS: A combined PGT-M (thalassemia) plus PGT-A system was developed for patients undergoing IVF in Vietnam. Here we developed a system for testing numerous thalassemia mutations plus SNP-based testing for backup mutation analysis and contamination control using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Low -pass next-generation sequencing was used to assess aneuploidy in some of the clinical PGT cases. Patients underwent IVF followed by embryo biopsy at the blastocyst stage for combined PGT-A/M. RESULTS: Two cases have completed the entire process including transfer of embryos, while a further nine cases have completed the IVF and PGT-M/A analysis but have not completed embryo transfer. In the two cases with embryo transfer, both patients achieved pregnancy with an unaffected, euploid embryo confirmed through prenatal diagnosis. In the further nine cases, 39 embryos were biopsied and all passed QC for amplification. There were 8 unaffected embryos, 31 carrier embryos, and 11 affected embryos. A subset of 24 embryos also had PGT-A analysis with 22 euploid embryos and 2 aneuploid embryos. CONCLUSIONS: Here we report the development and clinical application of a combined PGT-M for HBB and PGT-A for gross chromosome aneuploidies from 11 patients with detailed laboratory findings along with 2 cases that have completed embryo transfer.

Follicle size indicates oocyte maturity and blastocyst formation but not blastocyst euploidy following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation of oocyte donors.

STUDY QUESTION: Is there is an association between follicle size and the quality of oocytes retrieved from them as judged by ability to achieve the blastocyst stage, blastocyst grades and blastocyst ploidy? SUMMARY ANSWER: Although follicle size is a valuable predictor of oocyte maturity and is a significant predictor of the ability of a fertilized oocyte to become a quality blastocyst, the ploidy of each quality blastocyst is not related to the size of the follicle from which its oocyte was retrieved. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: It is unclear whether the oocytes within larger follicles are the best oocytes of the cohort. Although there have been studies examining follicle size in relation to embryo quality, there has been no study relating the incidence of euploidy in embryos to follicle size. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The purpose of this study was to examine follicle sizes and the oocytes from those follicles (and the embryos that result from those oocytes) to see if there is an association between follicle size and the quality of oocytes as judged by ability to achieve the blastocyst stage, blastocyst grades and blastocyst ploidy. Follicle sizes for oocytes were assessed both as diameters (mm) and as Z values (expressed as their size relative to the mean and standard deviation of that donor's follicular cohort). Comparisons were made using cumulative histograms, rolling averages and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and its AUC. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Twenty-two oocyte donors (ages: 24.5 ± 3.5 years) whose recipients would use ICSI for insemination were enrolled in this study. Follicles were aspirated one-at-a-time to be certain that the aspirated oocyte was from the same follicle measured. The follicle measurement (size) was noted in the embryology records. Oocytes were cultured individually throughout their time in the embryology laboratory so that follicle sizes could be uniquely associated with each oocyte. Oocytes and embryos were analyzed according to the size of the follicle from which the oocyte was retrieved. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Three hundred seventeen oocytes (96.1%) had an associated follicle size. Of the oocytes with follicle sizes, 255 (80.4%) had a polar body (MII), and 60 (18.9%) were immature: 31 (9.8%) with a visible germinal vesicle (GV stage) and 29 (9.1%) with neither a polar body nor a visible germinal vesicle (MI). The incidence of MII oocytes was significantly associated with larger follicle size using either mm (ROC's AUC = 0.87; P < 0.0001) or Z values (ROC's AUC = 0.86; P < 0.0001). Among MII oocytes there was no association with follicle size for the appearance of 228 oocytes with two pronuclei (2 PN). Among 2 PN's, the development of 94 quality blastocysts that underwent trophectoderm biopsy (TE Bx) exhibited a significant association with larger follicles using either mm (ROC's AUC = 0.59; P = 0.01) or Z values (ROC's AUC = 0.57; P = 0.01). The use of follicle diameter as a feature to distinguish between fertilized oocytes that would ultimately become blastocysts versus those that would not become blastocysts resulted in an enrichment for blastocyst formation from 20 to 40%. Of the 94 quality blastocysts, 51 were determined by next generation sequencing (NGS) to be euploid.Although oocyte maturity and the incidence of blastocyst formation were associated with follicle size, the incidence of euploidy among biopsied blastocysts was not. Follicles measured by two different methods (mm or Z values) led to predominantly the same conclusions. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study investigated the relationship between follicle size and measures of oocyte/embryo quality when donors were treated similarly. Therefore, this study does not investigate the effects of triggering and retrieving oocytes when the follicle cohorts are of different sizes or lead follicles are of different sizes. Although no association was found between follicle size and euploid blastocysts, the fact that blastocyst ploidy is not entirely dependent upon oocyte ploidy (e.g. aneuploidies derived from mitotic errors or from the fertilizing sperm) makes it difficult to infer the relationship between follicle diameter and oocyte ploidy. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: It is confirmed that follicle diameter is predictive of oocyte maturity. However, once oocyte maturity is known, the diameter of the follicle from which the oocyte was retrieved is not instructive. Embryos generated through fertilization and development of the mature oocytes from any observed follicle diameter were equally likely to become euploid blastocysts. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by ReproART: Georgian American Center for Reproductive Medicine. None of the authors declare any actual conflicts of interest. D.H.M. received compensation from ReproART, Biogenetics Corporation and the Sperm and Embryo Bank of New York and honoraria and travel funding from Ferring Pharmaceuticals and from Granata Bio. S.M. received compensation from Cooper Genomics and an honorarium and travel funding from Ferring Pharmaceuticals. L.C. is the founder of LTD Ovamedi, the organization that represents Cooper Genomics in Georgia, and received travel funding from the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

The 2019 PGDIS position statement on transfer of mosaic embryos within a context of new information on PGT-A.

BACKGROUND: A recently published Position Statement (PS) by the Preimplantation Genetics Diagnosis International Society (PGDIS) regarding utilization of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in association with in vitro fertilization (IVF) contained inaccuracies and misrepresentations. Because opinions issued by the PGDIS have since 2016 determined worldwide IVF practice, corrections appear of importance. METHODS: The International Do No Harm Group in IVF (IDNHG-IVF) is a spontaneously coalesced body of international investigators, concerned with increasing utilization of add-ons to IVF. It is responsible for the presented consensus statement, which as a final document was reached after review of the pertinent literature and again revised after the recent publication of the STAR trial and related commentaries. RESULTS: In contrast to the PGDIA-PS, we recommend restrictions to the increasing, and by IVF centers now often even mandated, utilization of PGT-A in IVF cycles. While PGT-A has been proposed as a tool for achieving enhanced singleton livebirth outcomes through embryo selection, continued false-positive rates and increasing evidence for embryonic self-correction downstream from the testing stage, has led IDNHG-IVF to conclude that currently available data are insufficient to impose overreaching recommendations for PGT-A utilization. DISCUSSION: Here presented consensus offers an alternative to the 2019 PGDIS position statement regarding utilization of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in association with in vitro fertilization (IVF). Mindful of what appears to offer best outcomes for patients, and in full consideration of patient autonomy, here presented opinion is based on best available evidence, with the goal of improving safety and efficacy of IVF and minimizing wastage of embryos with potential for healthy births. CONCLUSIONS: As the PGDIS never suggested restrictions on clinical utilization of PGT-A in IVF, here presented rebuttal represents an act of self-regulation by parts of the IVF community in attempts to control increasing utilization of different unproven recent add-ons to IVF.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): status and future challenges.

The world's first in vitro fertilization (IVF) baby was born in July 1978 in the UK. Since then, more than 7 million infants have been born worldwide as a result of IVF. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was introduced in the late 1980s for couples at risk of transmitting a genetic abnormality to their children. From the mid-1990s, this technology has been employed as an embryo selection tool for patients undergoing IVF and has been known as preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). The aim of this practice has been to identify and select euploid embryos for transfer, in order to increase efficacy of IVF cycle, ensure higher implantation rates or at least decreased time to pregnancy. In the early days, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) technology was used for genetic analysis. New advancements in both biopsy and cytogenetic have made possible the improvement of PGD and PGT-A analysis. Currently, a variety of technologies have been implemented to individuate euploid embryos to be preferentially transferred in IVF treatments. The purpose of this review is to clarify the differences between PGD and PGT-A, and to discuss current indications and requirements for embryo biopsy and genetic methodologies used.

The PGS/PGT-A controversy in IVF addressed as a formal conflict resolution analysis.

PURPOSE: To use conflict resolution analysis on the conflict between proponents and opponents of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), previously called preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). METHODS: Considered in conflict analysis a case study, we reviewed the English literature based on key-word searches at www.pubmed.com and www.google.com, and interviewed professional opinion leaders and other actor-representatives. This analysis was the product of a mandated externship by L.M. at the Foundation for Reproductive Medicine (FRM), as part of the Master of Science Program in Negotiations and Conflict Resolution at Columbia University, New York, NY. RESULTS: Initially a typical difference of opinion, conflict evolved after proponents rejected studies that failed to confirm expected benefits, and authors felt demeaned by their criticism. Becoming "destructive," the conflict evolved according to Glasl's escalation model stages. Proponents became continuous attractors. Unable to produce validations for PGT-A, proponents moved goal posts through 3 stages (PGS 1.0-PGS 3.0). Ultimately concurring that pregnancy and live birth rates are unaffected, they started claiming new benefits. CONCLUSIONS: The FRM underwrote this study as a starting tool for a conflict resolution process. A consensus building conference of stakeholders appears as of this point to represent the most promising potential intervention. The goal of such a conference should be sustainable consensus about clinical utilization of PGS/PGT-A in IVF, based on transparent and validated criteria. A potential date for such a conference is set for 2020.