Comparison of Jailed Wire and Jailed Balloon for Prevention of Side Branch Occlusion in Provisional Stenting: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Side branch (SB) occlusion after main vessel stenting is the main complication in treating coronary bifurcation lesions by provisional stenting. The Jailed Wire Technique (JWT), recommended by the European Bifurcation Club, is a standard technique to deal with this issue. The Jailed Balloon Technique (JBT) has been found to be more effective than the JWT in clinical practice by some interventionists, but it has not been widely accepted. In this meta-analysis, we compared the efficacy and safety of JBT and JWT. Methods: The literature comparing JBT and JWT was systematically reviewed. Stata/MP 17.0 was used to perform a meta-analysis. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE), cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR). The secondary endpoints were SB occlusion and SB dissection. Aggregated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. A sensitivity analysis was conducted if I 2 was > 50% or p < 0.01. Results: Thirteen studies involving 1789 patients were enrolled. JBT was found to have a significantly lower incidence of MACE, SB occlusion and dissection. The incidence of cardiac death, MI and TLR were also lower in the JBT group, though the differences were not significant. Conclusions: JBT prevents SB occlusion more effectively and does not increase immediate or long-term complications. JBT, or its modified versions, can be used to treat SBs with a high risk of occlusion.

Review of Progress in Interventional Therapy for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.

Despite a decade of extensive research and clinical insights, percutaneous coronary intervention strategies for coronary bifurcation lesions have remained a challenging and highly debated area. This article presents a review of the latest findings and advances in defining and classifying coronary bifurcation lesions, in vitro studies, intracoronary imaging, stenting strategies, and the deployment of drug-coated balloons. Based on current evidence, this review provides recommendations for interventional cardiologists to develop individualized interventional strategies and enhance the efficiency of stenting procedures.

Comparison of the Pre-Established and Finally Selected Treatment Strategies for Endovascular Treatment in Femoropopliteal Artery Lesions.

This study aimed to compare lower limb events associated with preplanned and finally selected treatment strategies-the validity and usefulness of the physician-chosen strategy were verified.We examined the data of 1003 patients in the registry of multicenter endovascular treatment for superficial femoral and popliteal artery disease study and prospectively enrolled patients who underwent endovascular treatment (EVT) of the femoropopliteal (FP) artery between February 2017 and June 2018 from 67 Japanese institutes. The outcome measures were major adverse limb events (MALE) and target vessel revascularization.The EVT strategies were classified into balloon angioplasty-alone (37.3%), primary stenting (26.7%), and provisional stenting (36.0%) groups. In the initial strategy analysis for the balloon angioplasty-alone, primary stenting, and provisional stenting groups, two-year rates of freedom from MALE (95% confidence interval) were 0.680 (0.620-0.732), 0.754 (0.688-0.808), and 0.798 (0.746-0.840), respectively. Additionally, the rate of MALE was significantly higher among patients in the balloon angioplasty-alone group than among those in the primary or provisional stenting groups in the initial strategy analysis (P = 0.007). Changes in treatment strategy were more frequent in the primary stenting group than in the other groups. Furthermore, the rate of MALE did not significantly differ among the three groups in the final strategy analysis (P = 0.56).Limb outcomes for the final applied strategy did not differ among the three strategies. Additionally, the physician's selection bias was mostly appropriate in the EVT of the FP artery.

Stepwise Provisional versus Planned Double Stenting Strategies in Treating Unprotected Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comprising 11,672 Patients.

Background: Provisional stenting is the preferred strategy for non-left main bifurcation lesions. However, its superiority over planned double stenting for unprotected left main distal bifurcation (UPLMB) lesions remains unclear. Previous studies have reported conflicting results. Methods: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing the outcomes of provisional stenting to planned double stenting for UPLMB lesions were identified. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The secondary endpoints were myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularisation (TVR), target lesion revascularisation (TLR), all-cause death, cardiac death and stent thrombosis (ST). Aggregated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. A sensitivity analysis was conducted if I 2 was > 50% or p < 0.01. Publication bias analysis was considered if more than 10 studies were enrolled. Results: Two RCTs and 19 observational studies comprising 11,672 patients were enrolled. Provisional stenting had a significantly lower incidence of MACE, mainly driven by TLR and TVR. Double stenting had a significantly lower incidence of cardiac death. In addition, patients undergoing provisional stenting had a lower tendency towards the occurrence of MI, while patients undergoing double stenting had a lower tendency towards all-cause death and ST. Conclusions: A provisional stenting strategy was associated with lower MACE, TVR and TLR but higher cardiac death. Further investigation is needed through RCTs to assess which strategy performs better.

Review of Techniques for Protecting Side Branch from Occlusion during Provisional Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.

Coronary bifurcation lesions remain one of the most challenging lesions for cardiology interventionists. The provisional stenting strategy has been regarded as the first option for most of these lesions. However, the main complication of this technique is side branch (SB) occlusion, which could lead to a peri-procedural myocardial infarction or even death. Various studies have focused on addressing this issue, but there are no definitive guidelines in the literature to treat these lesions. There isn't enough clinical evidence from randomized controlled trial or two-arm cohort studies to illustrate which techniques provide the best outcomes. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms, independent predictors and predictive models of SB occlusion, and review seventeen techniques involving SB protection and occlusion rescue. Every technique was evaluated according to related bench tests, clinical studies and our own clinical experiences. The aim of this review is to provide interventionists with new insights for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions.

Outcomes of Stented vs Nonstented Femoropopliteal Lesions Treated With Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty.

PURPOSE: Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty has been increasingly used for the treatment of lower limb peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, bail-out stenting may be necessary in cases of suboptimal angioplasty. This study investigated the outcomes of femoropopliteal disease treated with DCB with/without bail-out stenting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study enrolling 166 consecutive patients (DCB+stent: n=81 vs DCB: n=85) with 253 femoropopliteal lesions (DCB+stent: n=99 vs DCB: n=154) treated with DCB with/without stenting. Bail-out stenting was performed at the operator discretion for postangioplasty dissections or otherwise suboptimal angiographic result (>30% residual stenosis). Cox regression analysis was performed to examine the outcomes of DCB with/without stenting during 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: The baseline clinical characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. About half of the patients presented with critical limb ischemia, with most of the lesions located at the superficial femoral artery. The overall mean lesion length was 147±67 mm. The most frequent bail-out stent types were bare metal stents (BMS) (53.5%) followed by drug-eluting stents (DES) (41.4%). Lesions requiring bail-out stenting were on average longer (177±67 mm vs 127±59 mm; p<0.01) and on average had higher prevalence of flow-limiting postangioplasty dissections. The overall procedural success rate was 94% without any differences between the 2 groups. Both the stented and nonstented treatment modalities were effective and safe, demonstrating similar rates of 2-year freedom from major adverse limb event (stented: 71.3% vs nonstented: 64.4%) and 2-year freedom from target lesion revascularization (stented: 77.1% vs nonstented: 72.3%) during following up. The use of DES as bail-out therapy was associated with a lower risk of 2-year death compared with the use of BMS (DES: 97.2% vs BMS: 75.8%; p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Drug-coated balloon with bail-out stenting is a viable treatment option for cases of suboptimal DCB results, promising similar efficacy with DCB-alone procedures. However, as the patency of stents at the femoropopliteal segment may be a challenge due to the biomechanical stress of the artery, the efficacy of DCB+bail-out stenting should be further evaluated. In addition, future studies are needed to determine which grades of post-DCB dissections should be treated and optimize current bail-out strategies.

Simple Stenting Strategy with or without Branch Ostial Optimization Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.

Background: A simple stenting strategy with provisional side-branch (SB) stenting or crossover stenting has been recommended as the default approach for most coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs). The proximal optimization technique (POT) and POT-associated techniques (POTAs) were introduced to optimize the ostium of SB. However, these techniques are unable to remove the jailed struts or completely diminish vessel damage. In this study we developed a novel branch ostial optimization technique (BOOT) and assessed its efficacy and safety by a propensity score matching comparison (PSM) with POT-associated techniques (POTA). Methods: From June 2016 to March 2018, a total of 203 consecutive patients with true CBLs were treated with BOOT (50 patients) or POTA stenting (153 patients). We performed PSM to correct for confounders from clinical and lesion characteristics. The primary endpoint was cumulative major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12 months including cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel/lesion revascularization (TVR/TLR) or target vessel/lesion thrombosis (ST). Results: After PSM, there were 43 patients in each group. Follow-up coronary angiography was performed in 77 (89.5%) patients. At 12 months, the angiographic restenosis rate was significantly different between the BOOT group and the POTA group after PSM (proximal main branch: 20.01 ± 11.33% vs. 26.81 ± 14.02%, p = 0.003; distal main branch: 18.07 ± 3.71% vs. 23.44 ± 10.78%, p = 0.006; side branch: 23.53 ± 10.12% vs. 39.01 ± 10.29%, p < 0.001, respectively). The incidence of MACE at 12 months was not different between the BOOT group before PSM (8.0% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.604), but less frequent after PSM (4.7% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.026) when compared with the POTA group, mainly due to TVR/TLR (2.3% vs. 20.9%, p = 0.015). Conclusions: In patients with CBLs, BOOT is feasible for optimization of the SB ostium and may be superior to POTAs in terms of the angiographic measurements and long-term clinical outcomes at 12 months follow-up.

Outcomes and challenges of the provisional stenting technique: Insights from the PROGRESS-BIFURCATION registry.

BACKGROUND: Provisional stenting is the most commonly used coronary bifurcation stenting strategy. METHODS: We examined the clinical and angiographic characteristics, challenges encountered, and procedural outcomes with the provisional bifurcation stenting strategy in the Prospective Global Registry of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in Bifurcation Lesions (PROGRESS-BIFURCATION, NCT05100992). RESULTS: Provisional stenting was used in 334 of 430 bifurcation interventions (78%). Technical success was lower (95% vs. 100%, p = 0.017) in provisional, but procedural success (90% vs. 95%, p = 0.095) and incidence of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events were similar (5% vs. 5%, p = 0.945) compared with two-stent strategies. Provisional was less often preferred in left main/left anterior descending involvement (47% vs. 73%, p < 0.001). Provisional stenting cases had smaller side branch (SB) diameter (2.4 ± 0.5 vs. 2.7 ± 0.6 mm, p < 0.001), shorter SB lesion length (5 [3-8] vs. 10 [5-10] mm, p < 0.001), less SB diameter stenosis (46 ± 35 vs. 81 ± 20%, p < 0.001), and were less likely to be Medina 1,1,1 (34% vs. 73%, p < 0.001). PCI challenges were less common (30% vs. 58%, p < 0.001) with provisional stenting: (1) rewiring difficulty (43%) that was overcome with use of a different wire (74%) or microcatheter (46%); (2) inability to deliver a stent (22%) or balloon (9%) that was overcome with use of a smaller balloon (88%), rewiring (25%), or increased support/microcatheter (25%). CONCLUSIONS: Provisional bifurcation stenting was more often performed in distal lesions with less SB involvement and had lower technical success, but similar procedural success and complications compared with two-stent strategies.

Bioresorbable zinc stent with ultra-thin center struts attenuates stent jail in porcine femoral artery bifurcations.

INTRODUCTION: An ultra-thin, fracture-resistant and bioresorbable stent may be advantageous for provisional stenting in vessel bifurcations, if catheter passage and side-branch post-dilatation is facilitated to prevent a 'stent jail' by struts obstructing the orifice of a major side branch. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied a highly radiopaque, slowly bioresorbable zinc alloy stent characterized by a novel design of a radiopaque-marked region of ultra-thin struts in the center of the stent. The stent is characterized by an extended range flexibility and high fracture resistance. Zn-stents and Zn-drug eluting stents (DES) were implanted opposite to rigid Nitinol stents into both femoral artery bifurcations of 21 juvenile pigs, followed for one and three months and studied by angiography and histomorphometry.Results and conclusion: Bare Zn-stents with thinner stent struts showed less neointimal hyperplasia compared to Zn-stents with thicker struts. Neointimal formation was further reduced by 12% in Zn-alloy DES. Both, bare Zn-stents and Zn-DES, can be precisely positioned into the femoral artery bifurcation, allowing easy balloon catheter passage through the very thin strut mesh. Side branch orifices remained open after Zn-stent deployment without stent jailing. No stent fractures or particles emboli occurred after the deployment. A Zn-stent with ultra-thin center struts may be useful for provisional stenting in vessel bifurcations.

Multicentre, randomized comparison of two-stent and provisional stenting techniques in patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions: the DEFINITION II trial.

AIM: The present study aimed to assess the benefits of two-stent techniques for patients with DEFINITION criteria-defined complex coronary bifurcation lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, 653 patients with complex bifurcation lesions at 49 international centres were randomly assigned to undergo the systematic two-stent technique (two-stent group) or provisional stenting (provisional group). The primary endpoint was the composite of target lesion failure (TLF) at the 1-year follow-up, including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). The safety endpoint was definite or probable stent thrombosis. At the 1-year follow-up, TLF occurred in 37 (11.4%) and 20 (6.1%) patients in the provisional and two-stent groups, respectively [77.8%: double-kissing crush; hazard ratio (HR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-0.90; P = 0.019], largely driven by increased TVMI (7.1%, HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.90; P = 0.025) and clinically driven TLR (5.5%, HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19-1.00; P = 0.049) in the provisional group. At the 1 year after indexed procedures, the incidence of cardiac death was 2.5% in the provisional group, non-significant to 2.1% in the two-stent group (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.31-2.37; P = 0.772). CONCLUSION: For DEFINITION criteria-defined complex coronary bifurcation lesions, the systematic two-stent approach was associated with a significant improvement in clinical outcomes compared with the provisional stenting approach. Further study is urgently warranted to identify the mechanisms contributing to the increased rate of TVMI after provisional stenting. STUDY REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.com; Identifier: NCT02284750.

[Use of drug-coated balloons for interventions on bifurcation lesions of coronary arteries]. / Ispol'zovanie ballonov s lekarstvennym pokrytiem dlia vmeshatel'stv na bifurkatsionnykh porazheniiakh koronarnykh arterii.

Interventions on bifurcation lesions of the coronary bed are one of the most complicated tasks of interventional cardiology. Recent trends are toward active study of using drug-eluting balloons for interventions in this type of lesions. Using such technique makes it possible to minimize the risks associated with implantation of stents in sites of coronary artery bifurcations with good angiographic results. This article is a review of the literature data concerning the use of drug-coated balloons in interventions on bifurcation lesions of the coronary bed, discussing peculiarities of the balloon catheter design, dynamics of delivery of an antiproliferative drug to the vascular wall. This is followed by considering the experience with using innovative sirolimus-coated balloon catheters, as well as future perspectives of these devices for interventions in coronary artery bifurcation lesions.

Provisional Stenting Using the Zilver PTX Drug-Eluting Stent After Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty: Initial Experience From the Double Drug Dose "3D" Study.

Purpose: To explore the provisional use of a drug-eluting stent (DES) after suboptimal drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty in complex, calcified femoropopliteal lesions. Materials and Methods: A prospective, single-center, investigator-initiated pilot study enrolled 15 patients (mean age 71.3 years; 9 men) with symptomatic stenosis (n=6) or occlusion (n=9) of the native superficial femoral and/or proximal popliteal arteries who experienced suboptimal DCB dilation despite postdilation. Lesion characteristics were evaluated with computed tomography angiography and duplex ultrasound confirmed by intravascular ultrasound. Follow-up included clinical and imaging evaluations as well as blood tests to monitor inflammatory markers. Endpoints included systemic inflammation, acute/chronic thrombosis, aneurysm formation, and mortality. Results: Provisional stenting was required for residual stenosis >50% in 4 cases and flow-limiting dissection in 11. Provisional spot stenting was done using the Zilver PTX DES. Clinical improvement was observed in all cases. After 24-month follow-up all patients were alive and in good clinical condition. One- and 2-year primary patency rates were 93.3% and 92.9%, respectively; secondary patency was 100%. Restenosis required reintervention in 2 cases. No local or systemic complications or toxicity were observed due to the use of a double dose of paclitaxel. No significant increase in any inflammation marker was observed in the perioperative period, and no aneurysm formation was seen over 24 months of follow-up. Conclusion: Combined DCB plus DES therapy seems to be safe and correlated with high primary patency following suboptimal angioplasty. Larger studies are required to confirm the safety and efficacy of this approach.

Sequential coronary bifurcation revascularization with the Xposition S™ self-apposing stent: a comparative fractal bench study.

Coronary bifurcation revascularization needs to take account of the diameter differential between vessels and to limit side-branch obstruction (SBO). The self-apposing properties of the Xposition S™ stent (STENTYS, France) seem interesting in this regard. The present experimental fractal bench study determined the best provisional stenting technique using Xposition S™. Three sequential strategies were compared (n = 5/group): implantation alone, side-branch inflation (SBI), and re-POT (initial proximal optimization technique (POT) + SBI + final POT). 2D- and 3D-OCT analyses and micro-CT scan were performed to quantify the main mechanical results at each step. Of the three groups, SBI and re-POT provided better final results than implantation alone in terms of residual SBO (respectively, 24.6 ± 5.6% and 24.8 ± 5.0% vs. 46.5 ± 10.3%, p < 0.05) and malapposition (respectively, 0.9 ± 0.6% and 0.8 ± 0.4% vs. 3.8 ± 1.9%, p < 0.05). Unlike SBI, the two POTs of the re-POT sequence did not improve the final result. SBI, alone or as part of re-POT, systematically led to one connector breakage, whereas implantation alone maintained complete stent integrity (p < 0.05). In Xposition S™ implantation, SBI should be systematic, but not post-dilatation specifically dedicated to bifurcation stenting (i.e., POTs). However, global post-dilatation is still mandatory to prevent stent underexpansion due to untreated stenosis.

Modified balloon-stent kissing technique avoid side-branch compromise for simple true bifurcation lesions.

BACKGROUND: Coronary bifurcation remains one of the most challenging lesion subsets in interventinal cardiology. Provisional stenting (PS) is the dominate technique for bifurcation lesions, but the key problem is the deterioration of side branch. Balloon-stent kissing technique (BSKT) as a new systematic approach which is based on modified jailed balloon technique is applied to improve the procedure success. In our center, we proposed a modified balloon-stent kissing technique(M-BSKT), which routine usage of proximal optimizing technique (POT) after rewiring was added as an optimization step to BSKT. Thus, whether M-BSKT for addressing simple true coronary bifurcation lesions can provide more benefits in intra-operation effect and long term outcomes is still unknown. METHODS: A cohort of 120 consecutive patients underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) with simple true coronary bifurcation lesions satisfied the criteria were included in this retrospective, single-center registry. To assemble a cohort with similar baseline characteristics, a 1:1 propensity-matched score was used. The primary outcomes were the rate of device and procedural success, the situation of side branch (SB) after main vessel (MV) inflation and the complications during intra-operative. The secondary outcomes were the clinical prognosis at 12 months such as rehospitalization for unstable angina and MACEs. RESULTS: Before propensity matching, there were no significant differences in primary and secondary outcomes between two groups. After propensity-matched was used, 68 patients with similar propensity scores were included. At immediate procedural, M-BSKT was associated with a lower risk of SB deterioration and the application of final kissing balloon inflation (FKBI)[P = 0.036]. For ACS patients, besides the significant differences of immediate SB deterioration [P = 0.014] and FKBI application [P = 0.033], the incidence of TIMI flow< 3 in the PS was statistically significant higher than M-BSKT [P= 0.042]. The prognosis at 12 months such as rehospitalization for unstable angina and MACEs were similar for two groups [P = 0.613]. CONCLUSION: These observations prove that the M-BSKT enables side branch to be better protected in simple true bifurcation lesions, by a narrow margin. It may improve the angiographic outcomes about side branch deterioration and final kissing balloon performing compared with PS, especially in ACS patients. However, long-term clinical outcomes did not differ between patients treated for M-BSKT and PS at 12 months.

Cardiovascular outcomes associated with crush versus provisional stenting techniques for bifurcation lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for bifurcation lesions has often been challenging for Interventionists. Application of the correct intra-procedural technique is vital to generate beneficial outcomes after PCI. We aimed to systematically compare the post interventional cardiovascular outcomes which were reported using crush versus provisional stenting techniques for bifurcation lesions. METHODS: A computerized search was carried out through Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central and through www.ClinicalTrials.gov for English publications comparing crush versus the provisional stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions during PCI. Major adverse cardiac events, all-cause mortality, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target vessel and target lesion revascularizations were the endpoints in this analysis. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were generated during statistical analysis to represent the data. RESULTS: Six studies consisting of a total number of 2220 participants (1085 participants were assigned to the crush stenting technique and 1135 participants were assigned to the provisional stenting technique) enrolled between years 2004 and 2016 were included in this analysis. During a follow-up time period from six to sixty months, major adverse cardiac events (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.59-0.91; P = 0.005), target vessel revascularization (OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43-0.89; P = 0.01) and target lesion revascularization (OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.45-0.85; P = 0.003) were significantly lower in patients who were assigned to the crush stenting technique. However, all-cause mortality (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.48-1.68; P = 0.74), cardiac death (OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.29-1.08; P = 0.08), myocardial infarction (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.62-1.27; P = 0.53) and stent thrombosis (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.36-1.42; P = 0.34) were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: In patients with coronary bifurcation lesions undergoing PCI, crush stenting technique was associated with significantly lower major adverse cardiac events and repeated revascularization without any change in mortality, myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis when compared to the provisional technique showing a benefit of crush over the provisional stenting technique during PCI.

Comparative Analysis of Three Different Optimization Procedures for Coronary Bifurcation Provisional Stenting: Insights from Micro-Computed Tomography and Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging of Bench Deployments.

Background: Post-dilation with kissing balloon dilation remains controversial in the 1-stent approach, but many technical improvements are possible to refine the final results. This study aimed to evaluate the results of different side-branch (SB) ostial treatments after main vessel stenting, including ostial optimization technique (OOT), simultaneous kissing balloon dilation (KBD) and single balloon dilation (SBD). Methods: Three different ostial side branch treatments (OOT, n = 6; KBD, n = 6; SBD, n = 6) were emulated in a synthetic bifurcated phantom using a second-generation sirolimus-eluting stent (Firebird2TM, Microport, Shanghai, China). Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed to assess morphologies. Results: Compared to the non-OOT procedures (SBD and KBD), OOT was characterized by the sequential dilation of two snuggling balloons, creating a longer valgus struts length (OOT: 2.13 ± 0.30 mm, SBD: 1.23 ± 0.34 mm, KBD: 1.11 ± 0.39 mm, p < 0.01), broader angulation between the main-branch and valgus struts axes (OOT: 42.72 ± 0.91°, SBD: 25.77 ± 7.81°, KBD: 31.78 ± 1.34°, p < 0.01), shorter neocarina length (OOT: 0.28 ± 0.31 mm, SBD: 0.64 ± 0.38 mm, KBD: 1.11 ± 0.37 mm, p < 0.01), larger SB ostial area (OOT: 6.76 ± 0.17 mm2, SBD: 4.78 ± 0.86 mm2, KBD: 5.87 ± 0.89 mm2, p < 0.01), and lower index of stent cell distortion (OOT: 6.67 ± 3.33%, SBD: 10.67 ± 4.23%, KBD: 20.00 ± 5.29%, p < 0.01). In addition, the rate of severe strut malapposition was lower with the OOT procedure compared with the non-OOT procedures (OOT: 2.22 ± 0.48%, SBD: 10.31 ± 0.66%, KBD: 6.74 ± 1.24%, p < 0.01). Conclusions: OOT, consisting of an initial proximal optimizing technique (POT) and sequential snuggling balloon dilation and then re-POT, significantly optimized the results of provisional bifurcation treatment. The physiological and clinical significance of our observations await further clarification.

Plaque morphology predictors of side branch occlusion after provisional stenting in coronary bifurcation lesion: Results of optical coherence tomography bifurcation study (ORBID).

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify the predictors of side branch (SB) ostial stenosis developed after provisional stenting of the main vessel (MV) using optical coherence tomography (OCT). BACKGROUND: Provisional stenting remains the main approach to treatment of bifurcation lesions; however, it may result in the narrowing of SB ostium. There is little information about underlying plaque morphology of the MV lesion and its potential impact on the SB after provisional stenting. METHODS: Patients with stable coronary disease with angiographic MV lesion not involving SB were included in a prospective single center study. The primary outcome was significant SB ostium stenosis (SBOS), defined as residual stenosis of >50% after MV stenting. RESULTS: Thirty bifurcation lesions in 30 patients were analyzed in the study. Poststenting significant SBOS was observed in 30% of patients. The MV lesions with SBOS > 50% were characterized by a higher prevalence of lipid rich plaques (100 vs. 64%, p = 0.040) and spotty calcifications (60 vs. 0%, p = 0.005). Maximal lipid arcs were greater (257° vs. 132°, p = 0.001) and lipid volume index was higher (1380 vs. 574, p = 0.012) in the SBOS >50% group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified maximal lipid arc (odds ratio (OR): 1.014, p = 0.038) and the presence of lipid plaque contralateral to SB ostium (OR: 8.14, p = 0.046) before stenting as independent predictors of significant SBOS after PCI. CONCLUSIONS: High lipid content of the MV lesion and a contralateral location of lipid in the bifurcation area may contribute to SBOS after provisional stenting. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Evaluation of bifurcation stenting techniques at Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven in 2013.

AIMS: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of bifurcation lesions can be performed using various techniques. The aim of this study was to analyse the outcome of various techniques of bifurcation stenting in all patients undergoing bifurcation stenting at one large intervention centre in 2013, taking into account that more complex lesions might more often warrant a two-stent technique. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective study included 260 consecutive patients who underwent non-primary PCI of a bifurcation lesion at the Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, in 2013. Patients were classified into two groups: one-stent technique (provisional stenting), and two-stent techniques (culotte, crush and T­stenting). The primary endpoint was the rate of restenosis at 1 year. The secondary endpoints were procedural complications (side branch occlusion, periprocedural infarction, and death) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 year. Periprocedural complications occurred in 15 patients (5.8 %) with no difference between the groups (p = 0.27). After 1 year, restenosis occurred in 3.2 % of the patients in the one-stent technique group and 7.3 % in the two-stent technique group (p = 0.20). MACE at 1 year did not differ between the groups at 11.9 % and 12.2 % respectively (p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that there is no significant difference between restenosis rate, or any other outcome parameter, with the different techniques of bifurcation stenting. Since provisional stenting is the simplest, most straightforward and cheapest approach, if technically feasible this technique has our preference as the initial approach, and an upgrade can be considered if the result is insufficient.

DK mini-culotte stenting in the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions: a propensity score matching comparison with T-provisional stenting.

The conventional culotte technique remains not to be widely used for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions due to its inherent drawbacks. Here, we developed a double kissing mini-culotte stenting (DK mini-culotte) and assessed its efficacy and safety by a propensity score matching comparison (PSM) with T-provisional stenting. From June 2010 to June 2012, a total of 223 consecutive patients with true coronary bifurcation lesions (TCBLs) were treated with DK mini-culotte (91 patients with 92 lesions) or T-provisional stenting (132 patients with 135 lesions). We performed a PSM to correct the confounders from clinical and lesion's characteristics. The primary endpoint was cumulative major adverse cardiac event (MACE) at 1 year including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization or target lesion revascularization (TVR/TLR). The secondary endpoint was the rate of side branch (SB) restenosis at 12 months. After a PSM, there were 66 patients in each group. Additional SB stenting in the T-provisional group was performed in 10 (15.2 %) lesions. The incidence of 1-year cumulative MACE was 4.55 % for the DK mini-culotte versus 13.6 % for T-provisional stenting (P = 0.127), the rate of TVR/TLR was 1.52 % for DK mini-culotte versus 12.12 % for T-provisional stenting (P = 0.033). The SB binary restenosis rate was 5.6 % in the DK mini-culotte group and 22.4 % in the T-provisional group (P = 0.014). In summary, despite that there is no difference in MACE between groups, DK mini-culotte significantly reduce TVR/TLR and SB restenosis in the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions.

Clinical outcomes following bioresorbable scaffold implantation for bifurcation lesions: Overall outcomes and comparison between provisional and planned double stenting strategy.

The aim of this study was to investigate clinical outcomes of patients treated with a provisional stenting (PS) versus a double stenting (DS) strategy for coronary bifurcation lesions with bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS). There are limited data available with regards to outcomes following BRS implantation for bifurcation lesions. A total of 132 bifurcation lesions treated with BRS between 2012 and 2014 were analyzed. Of the total of 132 bifurcation lesions, 10 lesions were treated without crossover stenting. 99 lesions (81%) were treated with a PS strategy and 23 lesions (19%) with a DS strategy. The DS group consisted of patients with a greater number of true bifurcation lesions (PS 52.0% vs. DS 91.3%: P < 0.001). In the PS group, seven lesions (7.1%) were crossed-over to T-stenting. In the DS group, 13 lesions (57%) were treated with BRS to the side branch (SB). A hybrid stenting technique [BRS to the main branch, and metallic drug-eluting stent (DES) to the SB] was utilized in 10 (43%) lesions. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates were 5.5% for PS and 11.2% for DS (P = 0.49) at 1-year follow-up. Definite scaffold thrombosis did not occur at the site of any bifurcation lesion. These findings suggest that BRS implantation for bifurcation lesions is technically feasible. The rates of TLR tended to be higher in the DS group compared to when a PS strategy was employed. Larger studies are eagerly awaited to determine longer-term follow-up of this treatment strategy.