Ulnar lengthening for children with forearm deformity from hereditary multiple exostoses: a retrospective study from a tertiary medical center.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hereditary multiple exostosis (HME) usually present with forearm deformity with or without radial head dislocation. Ulna lengthening has been proposed to address this condition. Exostosis resection plus ulna lengthening has been adopted in our hospital since 2008, and patients with this condition were retrospectively reviewed. Herein, we aimed to investigate the optimal timing and clinical outcomes of this surgical approach. METHODS: In all, thirty-five patients (40 forearms), including 22 boys and 13 girls, were enrolled in our study from July 2014 to September 2020. We divided the patients into 4 groups based on the age when they received surgery and the status of the radial head. Pronation and supination of the forearm, flexion and extension of the elbow, wrist ulnar deviation and wrist radial deviation, and radiological parameters including ulnar length (UL), ulnar variance (UV), the percentage of radial bowing (RB/RL), radio articular angle (RAA) and carpal slip (CS), were assessed and recorded. RESULTS: The mean UL was significantly improved after surgery in four Groups (P<0.05). In patients with radial head dislocation, we found significant improvement in forearm, wrist function and elbow flexion (p < 0.05). For the patients with radial head dislocation, the juniors demonstrated better improvement in % RB and RAA (p<0.05, p = 0.003 and 0.031). CONCLUSION: Exostosis resection and ulna lengthening with unilateral external fixation can effectively improve the function and radiological parameters of forearm deformity in HME children. For patients with radial head dislocation, early surgery can achieve better results. For patients not associated with radial head dislocation, we recommend regular follow-up and surgical treatment after 10 years of age.

The impact of anatomic alignment on radiocapitellar pressure following radial head arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of radial head fractures is increasing, and radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is being more frequently used as treatment for irreparable fractures. Our objective was to compare radiocapitellar pressure between the native joint and 2 radial head prosthesis conditions: (1) a prosthetic head that was aligned to the forearm axis of rotation and (2) the same prosthesis with an axisymmetric nonaligned head. METHODS: Ten cadaveric specimens received a pressfit radial head prosthesis (Align; Skeletal Dynamics) for both prosthetic testing conditions. Anatomic alignment (AL) was defined as the prosthetic head aligned to the forearm axis of rotation. Axisymmetric alignment (AX) was defined as the prosthetic radial head aligned to the axis of the prosthetic stem. Axial load was applied with the elbow in extension and the forearm pronated. Data were collected using a Tekscan 4000 sensor. RESULTS: The mean pressure in the AL and AX groups were significantly higher than the mean pressure in the native joint. Compared with the native joint, the mean pressure was 19% higher in the AL group and 56% higher in the AX group. Peak pressure beyond 5 MPa occurred in 0 specimens in the native joint group, in 1 specimen (10%) in the AL group, and in 5 specimens (50%) in the AX group. DISCUSSION: Our results demonstrated that a pressfit radial head prosthesis aligned with the forearm axis of rotation yields capitellar pressures that were more similar to the native condition than a nonaligned pressfit prosthesis. These findings suggest that anatomic alignment may optimize capitellar wear properties, improving the long-term durability of radial head arthroplasty.

Minimum 10-year Follow-up after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Radial Head Fractures Mason Type II and III.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of complex radial head fractures remains controversial with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), radial head arthroplasty, and radial head excision being the most common treatment options. While ORIF is the preferred treatment strategy for Mason type II fractures, the optimal treatment of Mason type III fractures is debated. PURPOSE: To report minimum 10-year outcomes after ORIF of Mason type II and type III radial head fractures. We hypothesized that both Mason Type II and Type III fracture patients would demonstrate satisfactory clinical outcomes at minimum 10-year follow-up. METHODS: All patients with Mason type II or III radial head fractures who were treated with ORIF by a single surgeon between 2005 and 2010 were included. Fractures with significant bone defects were treated with bone grafts and elbow ligament injuries were treated with either primary ligament repair or reconstruction. Patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires were administered at the time of last clinical follow-up and at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients, including 13 male and 11 female patients with an average age of 39 (range 19-60) at the time of surgery met inclusion criteria. Thirteen patients suffered from Mason type II and 11 patients from Mason type III fractures. At initial follow-up, 21 out of 24 fractures (88%) demonstrated radiographic union. Three non-unions, 2 of which were Mason type III fractures, were treated with revision ORIF and iliac crest bone grafting. 11 patients developed postoperative elbow stiffness and required capsular release surgery. At last clinical follow-up, average flexion was 139 degrees, average extension was 4 degrees, average supination was 77 degrees, and average pronation was 81 degrees. The median DASH score was 7 (ranging from 0 - 32). Minimum 10-year follow-up (mean: 14.6 years) was collected on 18 of 24 (75%) of the patients. At a minimum of 10 years postoperatively, the median QuickDASH score was 4.5 (range: 0 to 25) and the median SANE score was 96.5 (range: 75-100). Median satisfaction with the surgical outcome was 10/10 (range: 3-10). CONCLUSION: ORIF of Mason type II and III radial head fractures results in high union rates with good functional outcomes at a mean of 14.6 years postoperatively. The study results suggest that ORIF of Mason type II and III radial head fractures leads to long-term positive functional outcomes.

Stress shielding following radial head arthroplasty: the impact of preoperative bone quality.

BACKGROUND: We sought to assess if the medullary diameter to cortical width ratio (MD:CW), canal flair index (CFI), and canal fill (CF) of the proximal radius were associated with the presence of stress shielding (SS) after a MoPyC radial head arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, international, multicenter (4 centers) study. A total of 100 radial head arthroplasties in 64 women and 36 men with a mean age of 58.40 years ± 14.90 (range, 25.00-91.00) were included. Radiographic measurements, including MD:CW, CFI, CF, and postoperative SS were captured at a mean follow-up of 3.9 years ± 2.8 (range, 0.5-11). RESULTS: SS was identified in 60 patients. Mean preoperative MD:CW, CFI, and CF were 0.55 ± 0.09, 1.05 ± 0.18, and 0.79 ± 0.11, respectively. The presence of SS was significantly associated with MD:CW (adjusted odds ratio = 13.66; P = .001), and expansion of the stem (adjusted odds ratio = 3.78; P = .001). The amount of the SS was significantly correlated with expansion of the stem (aß 4.58; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that MD:CW was an independent risk factor of SS after MoPyc radial head arthroplasty. Autoexpansion of the MoPyc stem significantly increased the risk of SS and its extent. Further studies involving multiple implants designs are needed to confirm the preliminary observations presented in the current study.

Look for the POLESTAR (POsteroLateral Engagement of Soft Tissue And Radial head) while navigating around elbow dislocation.

BACKGROUND: Elbow dislocation is frequently associated with bony and osteochondral posterolateral capitellar lesions that are often under-reported. We aim to examine the radiologic signs of posterolateral lesions on computed tomography (CT). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of CT scans was performed. Patients were classified into 4 groups: (1) simple elbow dislocation, (2) elbow dislocation with a fracture of the coronoid tip, (3) elbow dislocation with coronoid tip fracture and a radial head fracture inferior or equal to the anterior third, and (4) terrible triad defined as elbow dislocation with concomitant coronoid and radial head fracture with a more important involvement. Patients with a more complex fracture pattern were excluded. The presence of POsteroLateral Engagement of Soft Tissue And Radial head (POLESTAR) patterns was analyzed and subclassified as impaction type or fragmentation type. RESULTS: Fifty-one CT scans met the inclusion criteria. POLESTAR lesions were identified in 48 cases (94%): 46% impaction-type and 54% fragmentation-type POLESTAR. Analyzing patients from grade 1 to 4, impaction-type POLESTAR was found, respectively, from 40% to 57%, whereas fragmentation type was present from 60% to 43%. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a high incidence of POLESTAR lesions (94%) that can be present as impaction type or fragmentation type. Based on our preliminary results, impaction type is more common in grades 3 and 4, whereas fragmentation type is more frequent in grades 1 and 2.

Miniplates versus Headless Screws for Fixation of Displaced Radial Head Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Fixation of displaced radial head fractures using miniplates is technically challenging and has some drawbacks like hardware prominence and limitation of forearm rotation. Fixation by headless compression screws has emerged as a less invasive alternative to miniplates. This study compares the radiological and functional outcomes of both methods of fixation. METHODS: This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted at an academic level 1 trauma center. Sixty patients with displaced isolated radial head fractures were randomized to treatment using either headless compression screws or miniplates in 2 parallel groups. At the final follow-up of 18 months, patients were evaluated radiologically for union and clinically using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), elbow range of motion, grip strength, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and the Disabilities of the Shoulder, Arm, and Hand (DASH) score. RESULTS: Union was achieved after 8±1.7 weeks in the screw group and after 8.5±2.7 weeks in the plate group. The MEPS was significantly better in the screw group (87.7±10.7) than in the plate group (80.5±13.9). However, this difference is below the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the MEPS and as such may not be clinically meaningful. No significant differences were observed between both groups regarding flexion, extension ranges, VAS, grip strength, or the DASH score. However, supination and pronation were significantly better in the screw group. The rate of complications was higher in the plate group (26.7%) than in the screw group (3.3%). CONCLUSION: Both techniques yielded comparable outcomes with better forearm rotation, a lower complication rate, and a lower hardware removal rate in the screw group.

Added transverse screw in tripod construct increases stiffness in Mason III radial head fractures: a finite element analysis.

BACKGROUND: The tripod screw configuration has been shown to offer similar stiffness characteristics to a laterally placed plate. However, concern has been raised that the construct may be prone to failure in scenarios where the screw intersects at the fracture line. We performed a finite element analysis to assess potentially ideal and unideal screw placements in the tripod construct among Mason III radial head fractures. METHODS: A 3-dimensional proximal radius model was developed using a computed tomography scan of an adult male radius. The fracture site was simulated with a uniform gap in transverse and sagittal planes creating a Mason type III fracture pattern comprising 3 fragments. Three configurations were modeled with varying screw intersection points in relation to the radial neck fracture line. A fourth configuration comprising an added transverse interfragmentary screw was also modeled. Loading scenarios included axial and shear forces to simulate physiological conditions. Von Mises stress and displacement were used as outcomes for analysis. RESULTS: Some variation can be seen among the tripod configurations, with a marginal tendency for reduced implant stress and greater stiffness when screw intersection is further from the neck fracture region. The construct with an added transverse interfragmentary screw demonstrated greater stiffness (2269 N/mm) than an equivalent tripod construct comprising 3 screws (612 N/mm). CONCLUSION: The results from this study demonstrate biomechanical similarity between tripod screw constructs including where screws intersect at the radial neck fracture line. An added fourth screw, positioned transversely across fragments, increased construct stiffness in our model.

Loose fit versus press fit stems and risk for surgical reintervention following radial head arthroplasty: A US-based cohort study of 1575 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is performed with increasing frequency for reconstruction of comminuted radial head fractures. Implants can be categorized by stem design, either loose fit or press fit. Currently, the RHA literature does not suggest one implant type is superior to another based on revision and reoperation rates, although most RHA outcome studies have small numbers of patients with few events to detect a difference. This study evaluated the association between stem design and risk of revision and reoperation after RHA. METHODS: 1575 patients aged ≥18 years who underwent primary RHA within a US-based healthcare system were identified (2009-2021). Revision following the index RHA was the primary outcome of interest; ipsilateral reoperation was a secondary outcome. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate the risk of outcomes by loose versus press fit with the adjustment for race/ethnicity, ASA classification, region, surgeon RHA volume, and simultaneous ipsilateral extremity procedures. RESULTS: Of the 1575 RHA, 681 (43.2%) received a loose fit stem. The cumulative revision probability was 2.6% for loose fit and 3.5% for press fit. In adjusted analysis, we did not observe a difference in risk of revision (HR=0.78, 95% CI=0.41-1.46) or reoperation (HR=0.73, 95% CI=0.43-1.25). Additionally, there were no observed differences in risk of revision (HR=0.62, 95% CI=0.28-1.38) or reoperation (HR=0.90, 95% CI=0.48-1.71) in the patient subgroup who underwent additional procedures in the same extremity at the time of RHA. CONCLUSION: In this large multi-center cohort of 1575 primary RHA, we did not observe a difference in risk of revision or reoperation following RHA based upon stem design. The choice between using an implant with a loose or press fit stem may be based more on surgeon familiarity, implant availability and cost, and ease of use.

Short- to midterm outcomes of 139 pyrocarbon monopolar radial head arthroplasties.

BACKGROUND: The MoPyc radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is a monopolar implant with a pyrocarbon head that obtains rigid fixation via controlled expansion of the titanium stem. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term to midterm outcomes of MoPyc RHA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2002 and 2021, 139 MoPyc RHA were implanted in 139 patients with a RH fracture. The mean follow-up was 5.9 years ± 3.5 (range 1-16). Range of motion, mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, visual analog scale (VAS), radiographic outcome, and reason for failure were recorded. RESULTS: The mean MEP, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, and VAS scores were 89.1 ± 2.2 (range, 45-100), 17.5 ± 16.7 (range, 0-78), and 0.8 ± 1.6 (range, 0-50), respectively. Stress shielding (SS) and osteolysis around the stem were identified in 92 (66%) and 20 (14%) patients. A total of 47 (29%) patients experienced at least 1 complication and 29 (21%) of them required re-intervention. Persistent stiffness (n = 12; 9%) was the most common complication. No painful loosening was noted. Osteolysis around the stem, presence of an autoexpanding stem, and overstuffing were associated with a lower MEPS and an increase in VAS (P < .05). SS was associated with an increase in MEPS (adjusted beta coefficients= 6.92; P < .001) and lower VAS (adjusted beta coefficients= -0.69; P = .016). The autoexpending stem increased the likelihood of SS after RHA (adjusted odds ratio = 1.49; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: A well-fixed MoPyc RHA provided satisfactory short to midterm outcomes, without painful loosening. However, the autoexpanding stem system was associated with poorer functional outcomes and increased the likelihood of SS.

Radiographic and clinical comparisons between loose-fit and press-fit stems in monopolar radial head arthroplasty for comminuted radial head fractures.

PURPOSE: Few clinical studies have compared the operative outcomes between loose- and press-fit stems in radial head arthroplasty (RHA). We aimed to evaluate the radiographic and clinical results of the two radial head implant concepts. METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, 32 patients (24 women and 8 men) with a mean age of 63.1 years who underwent RHA for comminuted radial head fractures were reviewed between 2005 and 2021. Seventeen patients underwent RHA with a loose-fit stem (L-group), whereas the remaining fifteen patients underwent RHA with a press-fit stem (P-group). The mean follow-up period was 40.1 ± 9.9 months, with the minimum follow-up duration of 12 months. The radiographic findings were evaluated for periprosthetic osteolysis; furthermore, clinical outcomes were analyzed to measure the range of motion of the elbow. The rate of reoperations and prosthesis removal were also reviewed. RESULTS: The general characteristics of the patients were similar in the two groups. The rate of periprosthetic osteolysis was 17.6% in the L-group, whereas it was 53.3% in the P-group. The mean elbow flexions were 128° and 133° in the L- and P-groups, respectively. The mean elbow extensions were -12° and -9° in the L- and P-groups, respectively. The rate of reoperation was 23.5% in the L-group and 15.2% in the P-group. One patient in the L-group had the prosthesis removed because of surgical site infection, whereas one patient in the P-group had the prosthesis removed owing to painful loosening. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in the clinical outcomes and reoperation rate were observed between the two radial head implant concepts in this study. However, osteolysis occurred more frequently in the P-group. Although patients with periprosthetic osteolysis are currently asymptomatic, they should be carefully followed up for the symptoms in the long term.

Microstructure of the radial head: Insights into anatomical variations and implications for advanced interventions.

Appropriate management of radial head fractures is integral to prevent long-term consequences like chronic pain and loss of motion. Advanced imaging systems, like micro-computed tomography (µCT), are valuable for understanding radial head fracture patterns as they utilize micrometer scale resolution to define important parameters of bone health like cortical density and trabecular thickness. The purpose of this study was to identify and describe the structural morphology of the radial head utilizing µCT. Nine fresh-frozen cadaveric human radii were divided into four equal quadrants, based, and labeled as posteromedial, posterolateral, anteromedial, and anterolateral. Quadrants were scanned with a SCANCO MicroCT40 with both cortical and cancellous bone density measurements at a resolution of 36.0 µm. Bone density, direct trabecular number, and trabecular thickness were recorded as milligrams of hydroxyapatite/cm3. A one-way repeated measures ANOVA was performed to compare the bone densities, trabecular number, and trabecular thickness of each of the four quadrants (p < 0.05). The posteromedial quadrant contained substantially more bone than other quadrants. Significantly greater bone densities were found in the posteromedial quadrant (148.1 mg of HA/cm3) compared to the anteromedial quadrant (54.6 mg of HA/cm3), posterolateral quadrant (137.5 mg of HA/cm3) compared to the anteromedial quadrant (54.6 mg of HA/cm3), and posterolateral quadrant (137.5 mg of HA/cm3) compared to the anterolateral quadrant (58.1 mg of HA/cm3). The trabecular number was not significantly different between quadrants. Trabecular thickness was significantly lower in the anterolateral (0.1417 mg of HA/cm3) and anteromedial (0.1416 mg of HA/cm3) quadrants compared to the posteromedial (0.1809 mg of HA/cm3) quadrant. The posterior half of the radial head was found to have a higher density of columns and arches compared to the anterior half. The microstructure of trabecular bone in the distal radius forms columns, struts, and arches, which allow for efficient transmission of stress through the bone. The microstructure of the radial head has similar microarchitecture to the distal radius with the present study identifying the presence of columns and arches in the radial head. These structures, along with trabecular density, in the posterior radial head may explain the lower incidence of fractures involving the posterior half of the radial head. Furthermore, our study supports the idea that the high incidence of fractures involving the anterolateral quadrant is due to microarchitecture characteristics and the relative lack of supportive structures compared to other areas. The novel insight gained from this study will aid in the development of advanced interventions for preventative measures and better treatment of radial head fractures like more satisfactory purchase when screws are directed towards the denser posteromedial quadrant.

Usefulness of multiple bioabsorbable Mg screws/K­wires for comminuted radial head fractures.

PURPOSE: We hypothesized that multiple absorbable screws/K-wires would be effective for native head preservation in comminuted radial head fracture fixation (com-RHFs). METHODS: Seventeen patients who met the inclusion criteria between 2018 and 2020 were included. Radiologic findings indicating proper union and clinical outcomes such as the range of elbow motion, visual analog scale score, and Mayo Elbow Performance Score were assessed prospectively after surgery and at least three years of follow-up. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 4.6 years. Eleven, one, three, and two patients presented with isolated com-RHFs, type 2 (accompanied injury of medial collateral ligament), type 4 ("terrible triad") fractures, and type 5 posterior olecranon fracture-dislocations, respectively. Union was achieved after a mean of nine weeks postoperatively. The head and shaft angles did not differ significantly from the contralateral normal values (p = 0.778 and 0.872, coronal and sagittal, respectively). At the final follow-up, the mean flexion-extension/pronation-supination arcs were 126.47 ± 4.92°/135.59 ± 10.13°, and thus were significantly different from those on the contralateral side (p < 0.001, both), however the arcs were functional ranges for ordinary daily life. Also, functional status was satisfactory in all individuals. The arthritis grade and extent of heterotrophic ossification were satisfactory in all cases, and there were no serious complications requiring revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Absorbable screw/K-wire fixation for com-RHFs is an option before radial head arthroplasty associated with a low complication rate and no need for revision.

Anterior radial head subluxation in primary elbow osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: To investigate elbows with primary osteoarthritis (OA) for the presence of anterior radial head subluxation. METHODS: A total of 71 patients with elbow osteoarthritis and 45 with lateral epicondylitis were initially identified. The baseline characteristics and preoperative elbow X-rays of consecutive patients that had been clinically confirmed with elbow OA or lateral epicondylitis between March 2011 and January 2020 were then retrospectively reviewed. The radiocapitellar ratio (RCR; the ratio of the displacement of the radial head about the diameter of the capitulum) was calculated using lateral views. These RCR values were compared between the OA and lateral epicondylitis cases. RESULT: A significant increase was detected in RCR values between patients in elbow OA and the control group (13.2% (± 10.6) vs -1.2% (± 6.8), P<0.001). Based on receiver operating characteristic curves, RCR values had an excellent area under the curve (0.89) for the detection of elbow OA (Youden index, 0.69; sensitivity, 89%; specificity, 80%). Based on the ROC curve, the cutoff value of RCR was 0.04. Patients with RCR ≥ 0.04 had a significantly higher proportion of cases with elbow OA (risk ratio, 31.50 [95% CI, 11.17-88.82]) than those with RCR ˂ 0.04 (P ˂ 0.001). CONCLUSION: Radial head subluxation is a radiographic finding associated with elbow OA and RCR ≥ 0.04 could be used as an aetiological factor for elbow OA diagnosis.

Intraoperative visualization of the posterolateral ulnohumeral joint space is reliable to indicate overlengthening in radial head arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Avoiding overlengthening in radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is essential for the prognosis of the elbow joint. An overlengthening from 2 mm is visible due to widening of the anterolateral ulnohumeral joint space but intraoperatively, this particular joint space is difficult to visualize. The commonly used Kocher approach allows visualization of the posterolateral joint space without additional instruments or further surgical release of the already unstable elbow. The aim of our study was to investigate whether the visualization of the posterolateral joint space is also a reliable method to indicate overlengthening in RHA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: RHA was performed in five human cadaveric specimens with the forearm, wrist, and hand intact. The lateral ligament complex was detached and an anatomic transosseous refixation was performed. Six stages of implantation heights were documented: native joint (1), RHA at the anatomic height (2), + 2 mm (3), + 4 mm (4), + 6 mm (5) and - 2 mm (6). Macroscopic measurement and digital image analysis of the posterolateral and anterolateral ulnohumeral joint spaces were performed. RESULTS: All stages of overlengthening showed a significant increase in posterolateral and anterolateral joint space widening (p < 0.05). The posterior and anterior joint space showed excellent intraclass correlation. CONCLUSION: Visualization of the posterolateral aspect of the ulnohumeral joint space is a reliable indicator for overlengthening in RHA without further compromising an already unstable elbow. Correlation to the findings of the anterolateral ulnohumeral joint space in different implants leads to the assumption that visualization of either the anterior or posterior ulnohumeral joint space is universally applicable to determine overlengthening in RHA, regardless of the type of the radial head implant.

Long-terms outcomes of radial head arthroplasty using a bipolar prosthesis.

BACKGROUND: In acute treatment of radial head fractures, a radial head prosthesis can be considered if open reduction and internal fixation are not technically feasible. METHODS: We reviewed the data of 27 consecutive bipolar Judet radial head prostheses implanted in patients with unreconstructable radial head fractures and no other concomitant fractures (coronoid or olecranon factures). The lesions of the lateral collateral ligament were rated according to the McKee classification. Twenty-three patients with more than ten-year follow-up participated in this retrospective study All patients underwent assessments for pain, range of motion and stability using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, the QuickDash questionnaire and a Visual Analogue Scale for pain. Radiography assessment was performed to determine the correct setting of the implant, presence of periprosthetic loosening, prosthetic disassembly, heterotopic ossification, capitellum and ulnohumeral degenerative changes. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 149 months (± 12.2). Mean range of motion in flexion-extension was 111° (± 10.55), mean extension was 18° (± 14.32) and mean flexion was 130° (± 11.4). Mean arc of motion in supination-pronation was 150° (± 12.26). The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 88, the mean QuickDash score was 7.3; 86% of the patients were satisfied. Seven patients (26%) required secondary surgery. The most frequent complication was heterotopic ossification, which had negative consequences on the functional result. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar radial head prostheses are an option for acute treatment of isolated unreconstructable radial head fractures. During follow-up, three patients required implant revision and removal; the capitellum surface presented severe degenerative changes and the prosthesis was not replaced. Another complication was the risk of implant dislocation, in relation to implant design, incorrect positioning of the radial head stem or else to inadequate reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament. Further work is needed to establish the long-term follow-up results of Judet implants in complex elbow fractures.

Early range of motion results in good elbow function following conservative treatment of non-displaced radial head fractures.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the range of motion (ROM), elbow function and predictors for good elbow function after conservative treatment of non-displaced radial head fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients with non-displaced radial head fractures (displacement < 2 mm), that were diagnosed between January 1st 2017 and December 31st 2021 in a level I trauma center, were included in this retrospective case series and the charts were evaluated for ROM and elbow function. Elbow function was categorized as "good" or "bad" depending on the ROM measured defined by Morrey et al. Overall, 73 patients (33 male, 40 female) with an average age of 38 years (+/- 13 years) could be included. RESULTS: Conservative treatment had good clinical results for ROM and elbow function. After 6 weeks mean flexion was 131° (SD 13°), extension 8° (SD 7°), Pronation 83° (SD 11°) and Supination 83° (SD 13). Patients with a good elbow function after one week showed a good elbow function after completing the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A clinical assessment after one week should always be performed and the study showed that it is a good predictor for good elbow function. In cases of bad elbow function further controls should be considered.

Proximal radial neck fracture with complete 180-degree rotation of radial head: A case report.

Radial neck fractures with radial head rotation are very rare and extremely difficult to manage. We present the case of an 11-year-old girl who fell on her outstretched left upper extremity and damaged her left elbow in a road traffic accident. An arthrotomy was performed under a C-Arm fluoroscope, which confirmed the radial head displacement of 180° along with the fracture. The fracture site was reduced and fixed with two Kirschner wires, cutting the wire short at its distal end for a complete closure. Open reduction and internal fixation were followed by casting for five weeks. After two years of follow-up, she had complete pain free range of motion of the affected limb. No post-operative complications have been observed till date. Open reduction and internal fixation with two Kwires is a viable option for such complex injuries. However, further evaluation of outcomes and post-operative complications are required.

Open reduction and internal fixation of modified Mason type III/IV radial head fractures with more than three fragments: an analysis of the clinical outcome and reoperation rate.

PURPOSE: It is generally accepted that a radial head fracture (RHF) with more than three parts is not suitable for repair; therefore, most authors suggest straightforward radial head arthroplasty (RHA). With up to 20% risk for reoperation after RHA, improvement in reduction and fixation techniques may represent a valuable alternative before further extending the indications for arthroplasty. To determine the functional results and radiological failure rate after osteosynthesis of multi-fragmentary RHF with more than three articular fragments. We specifically determined (1) the one-year Broberg and Morrey functional elbow score, (2) duration of fracture healing, (3) complication rate, and (4) number of patients converted to RHA. METHODS: This study is a retrospective single-center case series. All patients who underwent primary osteosynthesis for RHF between 2012 and 2019 were included. Nine patients with an average age of 52 years had an average clinical and/or radiological follow-up of 49 months. RESULTS: The preoperative imaging identified nine fractures with four fragments. Three patients underwent osteosynthesis with plates and screws, whereas six patients underwent osteosynthesis with only screws. The mean Broberg and Morrey score was 95 points. Overall, eight of the nine patients had satisfactory results. All patients retained their radial heads and showed radiological fracture healing. Only two patients presented with low-grade complications requiring no further surgery. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that osteosynthesis of RHF with up to four fragments can achieve good functional results with a low complication rate and seems to be a valid alternative to RHA.

The use of hinged elbow orthosis following surgical management of terrible triad injuries of the elbow.

PURPOSE: To determine outcomes following surgical management of terrible triad injuries in patients treated with and without a hinged elbow orthosis (HEO) in the post-operative setting. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of 41 patients who underwent surgical treatment of terrible triad injuries including radial head fracture, coronoid fracture, and ulnohumeral dislocation between 2008 and 2023 with at least 10-week follow-up. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were treated post-operatively without HEO, and 22 patients were treated with HEO. There were no differences in range of motion (ROM) between patients treated with and without HEO in final flexion-extension arc (118.4° no HEO, 114.6° HEO, p = 0.59) or pronation-supination arc (147.8° no HEO, 141.4° HEO, p = 0.27). Five patients treated without HEO and one patient treated with HEO returned to the operating room for stiffness (26%, 5%, p = 0.08). QuickDASH scores were similar between groups (p = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: This study found no difference in post-operative ROM, complications, or QuickDASH scores in patients treated post-operatively with or without HEO. Based on these results, we cannot determine whether the use of HEO adds additional stability to the elbow while initiating ROM exercises post-operatively.

Functional and subjective outcomes after surgical management of complex elbow dislocations: a retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Dislocations of the elbow are the second most frequent upper-body injury after shoulder dislocations, comprising 11-28% of all elbow injuries. Complex elbow dislocations pose challenging management due to the involvement of critical stabilizing structures. This study aimed to investigate functional and subjective outcomes (MEPS, DASH, Oxford score) in 44 patients with complex elbow dislocations who underwent surgery between 2018 and 2020, with subgroup analysis focusing on gender and age differences. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients treated at C.T.O. Hospital, Turin, for complex elbow dislocations between January 2018 and December 2020. Surgical approaches included radial head synthesis, coronoid fixation, ligamentous repair, and ulnar nerve management. Postoperatively, patients followed a standardized or individualized program. Data analysis involved t-tests to assess score differences between subgroups. RESULTS: Among the 44 analyzed patients, the mean age was 48 years, and the mean follow-up time was 29 months. Various types of complex dislocations were identified, with radial head and coronoid fractures classified accordingly. Surgical approaches included multiple methods of reduction and synthesis. While most patients adhered to postoperative programs, subsequent reoperations were conducted in 11% of cases. Scores did not significantly differ between genders, although a trend toward better DASH scores in males was observed. Younger patients showed better, though not statistically significant, outcomes in mobility and functional measures. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the importance of pre-operative assessment for positive surgical outcomes in complex elbow dislocations. Additionally, findings suggest that younger age may correlate with slightly better functional outcomes. Despite limitations such as retrospective design and sample size, the study enhances our understanding of complex dislocation outcomes and provides valuable insights for future interventions.