Does foot shape really matter? Correlation of patient reported outcomes with radiographic assessment in progressive collapsing foot deformity reconstruction: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: In progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD), the goal of surgery is to obtain a well-balanced plantigrade foot. It remains unclear if restoration of the alignment and subsequent improvement in radiological parameters is associated with improved patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The aim of the current systematic review was to investigate whether there is a correlation between radiographic assessment and PROMs in patients treated surgically for flexible PCFD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed in Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails (CENTRAL), and KINAHL. We included all the studies reporting both PROMs and radiological outcomes in patients treated surgically for PCFD. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal tool. RESULTS: Six retrospective studies were included. Radiological parameters related to forefoot plantarflexion were associated with statistically significant differences in postoperative PROMs. A neutral hindfoot and midfoot position was positively correlated with postoperative PROMs but a statistically significant difference could not be established in all studies. The medial arch height was positively correlated with PROMs, but in one study this was the case only in revision surgeries. CONCLUSION: The literature so far suggests restoration of the alignment may be associated with improved PROMs. Future prospective studies that investigate possible radiological and clinical correlations in PCFD surgery are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Mini-Implants Retaining Removable Partial Dentures in Subjects without Posterior Teeth: A 5-Year Prospective Study Comparing the Maxilla and the Mandible.

Background and objectives: Long-term studies of clinical outcomes of mini-implants (MDIs) in the first premolar/canine sites retaining a bilateral free-ending removable partial dentures (RPD) in Kennedy class I subjects have not been well documented. The aim was to assess clinical outcomes in a prospective 5-year cohort study comparing the mandible and maxilla. Material and Methods: Participants (n = 92) who received two MDIs each and a new RPD were reviewed after one, three and five years. A total of 71 participants (82 mini-implants in the mandible; 58 in the maxilla) completed the study. Marginal bone level change, success, survival rates, Modified Plaque (MPI) and Bleeding Indices (MBI) were assessed. Results: The five-year success rate was 93.3% and 93.4% (p > 0.05), in the mandible and the maxilla, respectively. Mean peri-implant bone loss (MBL) increased significantly over five years (p < 0.01) to 0.50 mm in the mandible and 0.52 mm in the maxilla. Age had a significant effect on the MBL (higher rates in younger participants), while jaw of insertion, gender, and antagonistic jaw status did not. MPI and MBI were not significantly correlated with MBL. Conclusions: The insertion of two MDIs in previous first premolar/canine sites for retention of a free-end saddle RPD can be a successful treatment modality in subjects with narrow alveolar ridges.

Mid-Term Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Total Ankle Replacement in an Asian Cohort.

There are limited studies looking at longer-term outcomes of the total ankle replacement (TAR) in the Asian cohort. Asian ankles are smaller in size and are more varus compared to Western cohorts. Cultural differences also require increased ankle range of motion demands. Therefore, assessment of longer-term functional and radiological outcomes in the Asian cohort is warranted. Between 2007 and 2015, 43 consecutive patients received a 3-component, cementless, unconstrained, fully congruent TAR. Patients were followed up over a mean 8 (range 5-14 years). Preoperative and postoperative AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score (AOFAS-AHS), visual analogue score (VAS), physical and mental component scores of the SF-36 (PCS and MCS respectively) were calculated. European Foot and Ankle Score was also recorded at 8 years. Radiographs were reviewed postoperatively to assess implant position and study evidence of implant loosening and impingement. At 8 years, survivorship was 83.5%. Reasons for implant removal included infection (n = 2) and aseptic loosening (n = 5). AOFAS-AHS, VAS MCS at 8 years postoperatively were comparable to outcomes at 2 years postoperatively (p > .05). PCS at 8 years demonstrated improvement compared to 2 years postoperatively (49 ± 7 vs 42 ± 11, p = .048). Radiographic impingement was noted in 9 cases (20.9%). Radiological loosening was noted in 8 cases with 5 cases requiring revision surgery. At 8 years postoperatively, clinical outcomes, radiological outcomes and survivorship following TAR in an Asian cohort are satisfactory and comparable to that found in existing literature. Long-term studies are required to ascertain survivorship of TAR. Implant design with the Asian cohort in mind may yield improved outcomes.

A device that facilitates screwing at an appropriate angle in quadrilateral surface fractures: 105-degree drill attachment.

BACKGROUND: Within this study, we aimed to investigate the radiological and functional outcomes of acetabular fractures involving quadrilateral surface using 105° drill attachment in the anterior intrapelvic approach. METHODS: The 35 patients who underwent surgical treatment from January 2016 and January 2020 for acetabular fractures involving quadrilateral surface with anterior intrapelvic approach using 105° drill attachment and a minimum of 12 months of postoperative follow-up were included. Perioperative complications, operation duration, and the quality of reduction were evaluated. Reduction quality was classified as poor, imperfect, and anatomic. Functional evaluation was performed according to the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Merle d'Aubigne Score. RESULTS: Among 35 patients (median age 36 (21-80)), radiological results of the acetabular fixations were anatomic, imperfect, and poor in 28 (80%), 5 (14.3%), and 2 (5.7%) patients, respectively. Postoperative 1-year functional outcomes with Merle d'Aubigne scores and HHS were median 18 (10-18) and 90 (60-96), respectively. The clinical outcomes of the patients showed concordance with reduction quality. The median operation duration was 180 minutes (range 125-270). Iatrogenic neurovascular damage was not noted in any patients. DISCUSSION: Reduction and fixation of deep intrapelvic fractures are risky and difficult due to the narrow anatomy and adjacent crucial neurovascular structures. As the 105-degree drill application is safe and easy to intervene in, short surgery duration and satisfactory results with minimum complications can be obtained with a 105 angulated drill in the deep pelvic region.

Comparative radiological outcomes and complications of sacral-2-alar iliac screw versus iliac screw for sacropelvic fixation.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of sacropelvic fixation (SPF) using sacral-2-alar iliac (S2AI) screw with SPF using iliac screw (IS). METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Scopus was performed for comparative studies between S2AI and IS for SPF. Two independent investigators selected qualified studies and extracted data indispensably. With 95% confidence intervals (CI), the odds ratio (OR) was applied to dichotomous outcomes and standardized mean difference (SMD) was applied to continuous outcomes for each item. RESULTS: We included data from thirteen studies involving 722 patients (S2AI, 357 patients; IS, 365 patients). In the pediatric population, the S2AI group had a smaller pelvic obliquity (PO) than the IS group at final follow-up (SMD, - 0.38; 95% CI, - 0.72 to - 0.04). Patients who underwent S2AI screws showed reduced rates of re-operation (S2AI, 13%; IS, 28%), implant failure (S2AI, 12%; IS, 26%) [screw loosening (S2AI, 8%; IS, 20%); screw breakage (S2AI, 2%; IS, 12%)], implant prominence (S2AI, 2%; IS, 14%), pseudarthrosis (S2AI, 3%; IS, 15%), wound infection (S2AI, 8%; IS, 22%) and less blood loss (S2AI, 2035.4 ml; IS, 2708.4 ml). CONCLUSION: Radiological outcomes indicate an effective maintenance of the correction and arrest of progression of deformity by S2AI, which is equal or better than IS. SPF with S2AI screw has obviously lower incidence of postoperative complications and less blood loss. Given these advantages, the S2AI screw seems to be a beneficial alternative to IS.

Lateral column osteotomy versus subtalar arthroereisis in the correction of Grade IIB adult acquired flatfoot deformity: A clinical and radiological follow-up at 24 months.

BACKGROUND: Adult acquired flat foot deformity (AAFD) is a spectrum of conditions which can be progressive if untreated. Surgical correction and restoration of anatomical relationship are often required in the treatment of symptomatic Grade II AAFD after a failed course of conservative treatment. There is a paucity of literature recommending best practice-especially in the adult population. The authors aim to compare radiological and clinical outcomes of two widely employed surgical techniques in the treatment of symptomatic AAFD. METHODS: A retrospective study of 76 patients with Grade IIB AAFD and had undergone either lateral column lengthening (LCL) or subtalar arthroereisis (STA) surgical correction of their symptomatic AAFD. Each technique was augmented with both bony osteotomy and soft tissue transfer as determined by on table assessment. Clinical and radiological outcomes were reviewed 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: LCL and STA groups had comparable radiological outcomes at 24 months after surgery. However, LCL group demonstrated superior American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot (90.3 ± 12.6 vs 81.1 ± 20.6, p < 0.001) as well as Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) midfoot scores (0.5 ± 1.6 vs 1.3 ± 2.4, p < 0.001) at 24 months compared to the STA group. STA had a higher complication rate (20.6% vs 4.4%), with all cases complaining of sinus tarsi pain requiring subsequent removal of implant. CONCLUSION: There is a role for either techniques in the treatment of symptomatic AAFD. LCL whilst more invasive has demonstrated superior outcome scores and lower complication rates at 24 months compared to STA. Patients need to be counselled appropriately to appreciate the benefits of each technique.

[Smoking as a risk factor of advanced heterotopic ossification in patients after lumbar total disk arthroplasty]. / Kurenie kak faktor riska uvelicheniya skorosti formirovaniya ochagov geterotopicheskoi ossifikatsii u patsientov posle vypolneniya total'noi artroplastiki poyasnichnykh mezhpozvonkovykh diskov.

Smoking is an obvious risk factor of adverse events in early and long-term postoperative period after spine surgery including lumbar total disk arthroplasty. Objective. To study the effect of smoking on clinical and radiological outcomes after lumbar total disk arthroplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective observational cohort study was performed. We have analyzed medical records of patients who underwent single-level lumbar total disk arthroplasty for degenerative disease. RESULTS: The study included 57 medical records of respondents. The examined medical records were divided into two groups - smokers (n=26) and non-smokers (n=31). There were no significant between-group differences in clinical outcomes. Incidence of adverse events was similar too. Kaplan-Meier event-free survival was similar in both groups. There were no significant between-group differences in X-ray data. Development of heterotopic ossification after lumbar total disk arthroplasty was more active in smokers. CONCLUSION: Smoking has no significant effect on clinical and radiological outcomes in patients after single-level after lumbar total disk arthroplasty. On the other hand, smoking significantly increases formation of heterotopic ossification after lumbar total disk arthroplasty.

Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of bioactive glass ceramic to allograft bone for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with anterior plate fixation.

Recently, a bioactive glass ceramic (BGC) has been developed for use as intervertebral cages for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, the effectiveness and safety of BGC cages remain to be evaluated. We completed a retrospective comparison of the radiological and clinical outcomes of 36 patients (52 levels) who underwent ACDF with a BGC cage and 35 patients (54 levels) using allograft bone. The following variables were compared between the two groups: the visual analog (VAS) neck and arm pain score and the neck disability index (NDI), measured before surgery and 1 year after; the change in Cobb's angle, between the C2 and C7 vertebrae, the global sagittal angle, and disc height compared from before surgery to 1 year after; and the rate of spinal fusion and cage subsidence at 1 and 2 years after surgery. The VAS and NDI scores were not different between the two groups. Similarly, the spinal fusion rate was not different between the BGC and allograft bone group at 1 year (73% and 87%, respectively; p = 0.07) and 2 years (94% and 91%, respectively; p = 0.54) after surgery. However, the rate of cage subsidence was higher in the allograft bone (43%) than the BGC (19%) group (p = 0.03), as was the rate of instrument-related failure (p = 0.028), with a specifically higher incidence of implant fracture or failure in the allograft bone group (p = 0.025). Overall, our findings indicate that BGC cages provide a feasible and safe alternative to allograft bone for ACDF.

Standalone oblique lateral interbody fusion vs. combined with percutaneous pedicle screw in spondylolisthesis.

BACKGROUND: To compare standalone oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) vs. OLIF combined with posterior bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (OLIF combined) for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent standalone OLIF or combined OLIF between 07/2014 and 08/2017 at two hospitals in China. Direct decompressions were not performed. Visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), satisfaction rate, anterior/posterior disc heights (DH), foraminal height (FH), foraminal width (FW), cage subsidence, cage retropulsion, fusion rate, and complications were analyzed. All imaging examinations were read independently by two physicians and the mean measurements were used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients were included: 32 with standalone OLIF and 41 with combined OLIF. The total complication rate was 25.0% with standalone OLIF and 26.8% with combined OLIF. There were no differences in VAS and ODI scores by 2 years of follow-up, but the scores were better with standalone OLIF at 1 week and 3 months (P < 0.05). PDH and FW was smaller in the combined OLIF group compared with the standalone OLIF group before and after surgery (all P < 0.05). There were significant differences in FH before surgery and at 1 week and 3 months between the two groups (all P < 0.05), but the difference disappeared by 2 years (P = 0.111). Cage subsidence occurred in 7.3% (3/41) and 7.3% (3/41) of the patients at 3 and 24 months, respectively, in the combined OLIF group, compared with 6.3% (2/32) and 15.6% (5/32), respectively, in the standalone OLIF group at the same time points (P = 0.287). There was no cage retropulsion in both groups at 2 years. The fusion rate was 85.4%(35/41) in the combined OLIF group and 84.4% (27/32) in the standalone OLIF group at 3 months(P = 0.669). At 24 months, the fusion rate was 100.0% in the combined OLIF group and 93.8% (30/32) in the standalone OLIF group (P = 0.066). CONCLUSION: Standalone OLIF may achieve equivalent clinical and radiological outcomes than OLIF combined with fixation for spondylolisthesis. The rate of complications was similar between the two groups. Patients who are osteoporotic might be better undergoing combined rather than standalone OLIF. The possibilty of proof lies within a future prospective study, preferably an RCT.

Closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy, a reliable procedure for osteoarthritic varus knee.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of patients who underwent closing-wedge High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) for the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis and to evaluate the conversion rate to knee arthroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective, non-randomized, monocentric study was performed in our Institution considering 166 patients between 1989 and 2012. The final population was composed by 82 patients (94 knees), median age at time of operation was 53 (range 45-73) years. All patients were evaluated clinically (HSS Score, Tegner Scale, VAS and Crosby-Insall Grading) and radiographically (osteoarthritis staging, hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, tibial slope and metaphyseal varus). RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 11.9 ± 7.2 years. HSS Score increased significantly from 70.8 ± 10 to 93.2 ± 9.1 (p < 0.05) instead Tegner Scale increased from 1.3 ± 0 (range 1-4) to 2.8 ± 0.7 (range 2-6) at the last control (n.s.); VAS score significantly decreased from 7.9 ± 1.4 to 1.6 ± 1.1 (p < 0.05) at last follow-up. According to the Crosby-Insall Grading System, 80 patients (97.4%) reported excellent-good results. HKA angle decreased from 6.9° ± 3.5 to 2.6° ± 2.6 (p < 0.01), tibial slope decreased from 10.1° ± 1.4 to 6.8° ± 2.1 (p < 0.05) and finally the metaphyseal varus decreased from 4.2° ± 0 to 2.1° ± 1.2 (n.s.) at the last follow-up. Adverse events were reported in 4.8%. Osteotomy survivorship rate resulted 92% at 10 years, 82% at 15 years and 80% at 20 years. Sixteen revisions (9.6%) were reported at a mean period of 12.8 years. CONCLUSIONS: CW-HTO is a valid option for medial osteoarthritis treatment, with successful results in both clinical and radiological outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

The impact of proximal femoral nail type on clinical and radiological outcomes in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures: a comparative study.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to compare three different proximal femoral nails in terms of functional and radiological outcomes in patients treated with closed reduction and internal fixation for intertrochanteric femur fractures (IFFs). METHODS: Between February 2010 and March 2016, 303 consecutive patients (132 male, 171 female) were included in the study. The groups were compared in terms of age, gender, body mass index, duration of surgery and duration of fluoroscopy, blood loss, type of fracture and quality of the reduction, complication rate, and functional and radiological results. Harris hip score (HHS), Barthel index, and full weight bearing time were used for functional evaluation. The quality of the reduction, collodiaphyseal angle (CDA), tip-apex distance (TAD), and fracture union were used for radiological results evaluation. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between groups in terms of fracture type, reduction quality, and complication rates. The mean operation time, duration of scopy, blood loss, and TAD was higher for InterTan, whereas the mean postoperative CDA was higher for PFNA-II. Operation time, postoperative CDA, and full weight bearing duration were higher for Profin than for InterTan. The mean HHS and Barthel Index were higher for PFNA-II, while the mean duration of operation and fluoroscopy, blood loss, TAD, and full weight bearing time were higher for Profin. CONCLUSION: PFNA-II is a better option than Profin and InterTAN in the treatment of IFFs when the surgical parameters and functional and radiological results were evaluated as a whole.

No difference in anterior knee pain after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with or without patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to compare functional outcomes of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients with patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PF OA) and those without PF OA and to evaluate the effect of PF OA on functional outcomes after UKA. METHODS: The outcomes of 48 knees in patients without PF OA who underwent medial UKA (non-PF OA group) were compared to the outcomes of 57 knees in patients with PF OA [Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade ≤ 2] who underwent medial UKA (PF OA group) with a median follow-up of 5.4 years (range 3.1-10.2 years). Clinical outcomes including anterior knee pain, HSS scores, radiological parameters, and the progression of patellofemoral osteoarthritis were compared, and their effects on functional outcomes were evaluated at the final follow-up visits. RESULTS: At final follow-up visits, no significant inter-group difference was found in terms of anterior knee pain (1.9 vs. 1.9 in non-PF OA and PF OA groups, respectively), HSS score, or range of motion. Preoperative anterior knee pain and patellofemoral joint degeneration were found to be unrelated to poor outcome in patients that underwent medial UKA. Furthermore, no correlation was found between any functional outcome variable and chondral lesion pattern. CONCLUSIONS: The result of UKA for medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis was excellent regardless of PF OA (K-L grade ≤ 2). Hence, the patients with medial unicompartmental OA combined with a moderate degree of anterior knee pain or patellofemoral arthritis should be viewed as appropriate candidates for medial UKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Impact of Self-Reported Loss of Balance and Gait Disturbance on Outcomes following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate if imbalance influences complication rates, radiological outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Methods: ASD patients with baseline and 2-year radiographic and PROMs were included. Patients were grouped according to whether they answered yes or no to a recent history of pre-operative loss of balance. The groups were propensity-matched by age, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and surgical invasiveness score. Results: In total, 212 patients were examined (106 in each group). Patients with gait imbalance had worse baseline PROM measures, including Oswestry disability index (45.2 vs. 36.6), SF-36 mental component score (44 vs. 51.8), and SF-36 physical component score (p < 0.001 for all). After 2 years, patients with gait imbalance had less pelvic tilt correction (-1.2 vs. -3.6°, p = 0.039) for a comparable PI-LL correction (-11.9 vs. -15.1°, p = 0.144). Gait imbalance patients had higher rates of radiographic proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) (26.4% vs. 14.2%) and implant-related complications (47.2% vs. 34.0%). After controlling for age, baseline sagittal parameters, PI-LL correction, and comorbidities, patients with imbalance had 2.2-times-increased odds of PJK after 2 years. Conclusions: Patients with a self-reported loss of balance/unsteady gait have significantly worse PROMs and higher risk of PJK.

Prospective Assessment of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) in Spondylolisthesis: A Radiological and Functional Outcome Study in an Indian Population.

INTRODUCTION:  Spondylolisthesis is a common spinal condition in which one vertebra slips over another, leading to pain and disability. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has emerged as a surgical option for addressing spondylolisthesis; however, limited research exists, especially in the Indian context, evaluating its radiological and functional outcomes. OBJECTIVE:  The study aimed to evaluate the radiological and functional outcomes of TLIF in spondylolisthesis using standardized scoring systems, to evaluate the sagittal balance of the spine radiologically in patients who have undergone TLIF for spondylolisthesis, and to evaluate the correlation between the functional and radiological outcomes after TLIF. METHODS:  This prospective observational study included spondylolisthesis patients undergoing TLIF at SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre from August 2022 to August 2024. Criteria included Meyerding grade 1-4 spondylolisthesis, single-segment fusion, and willingness for 12-month follow-up. RESULTS:  Forty-five patients were included with age 36.6 ± 12.2 years, with 73.3% being female. L4-L5 is the most common level affected in 21 patients (46.7%). Significant improvements were observed in pelvic tilt 19.07 ± 2.05, sacral slope 30.6 ± 4.4, segmental lordosis 18.4 ± 1.4, lumbar lordosis 57.1 ± 1.8, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) 2.5 ± 0.3, Visual Analog Scale for pain 0.4 ± 0.5, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores 5.23 ± 2.6 postoperatively (p < 0.05). At one-year follow-up, 84.4% of patients had good-to-excellent outcomes, and 44.4% had definitive fusion according to modified Lee criteria. However, there was no correlation between ODI score and grade of listhesis, pelvic incidence (PI), or SVA of the spine (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION:  This study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of TLIF surgery in addressing spondylolisthesis, both in terms of radiological and functional outcomes. However, there was no correlation between improvement in functional and radiological parameters (PI vs. ODI, SVA vs. ODI). TLIF appears to offer significant improvements in patient well-being and quality of life. These findings contribute to understanding TLIF's suitability as a treatment for spondylolisthesis and can inform clinical practice, ultimately benefiting patients suffering from this condition.

The influence of the surgeon's handedness and standing position at the operating table on the radiological outcomes in primary total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare radiological outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in mechanical alignment implant positioning in the coronal and sagittal planes depending on surgeons' handedness and their position at the operating table. METHODS: A total number of 200 consecutive patients with idiopathic osteoarthritis and varus knees who underwent TKA were retrospectively included in this research. Patients were operated on by 4 surgeons (50 for each surgeon) selected according to their handedness and position at the operative table. Surgeon I (right-handed, standing at the operating table always on the right side); Surgeon II(left-handed, standing at the operating table always on the left side); Surgeon III (right-handed, standing at the operating table on the side of the operated limb); Surgeon IV (left-handed, standing at the operating table on the side of the operated limb). RESULTS: Comparing postoperative radiological results statistically significant differences were calculated in the case of deviation from HKA angle (left TKA -1.5°; Interquartile Range [IQR] = -2.6-[-1] vs right TKA -3°; IQR = -4.5-[-2]; p = 0.01) for surgeon II and MPTA for surgeon IV (left TKA 0°; IQR = -1-0.5 vs right TKA 1°; IQR = 0-2; p < 0.01). Higher deviation from the mechanical alignment angles and implant positioning was revealed for a less convenient operation site for the surgeon. CONCLUSION: We recommend that all surgeons performing TKAs from the less comfortable side should take great care in establishing the MPTA and HKA angles to avoid surgical errors in implant positioning and limb alignment.

Assessment of radiological and functional outcomes of complex acetabulum fracture managed with combined anterior and posterior approach in a single anaesthetic setting: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate selection of surgical approach for associated fractures of the acetabulum that involves both columns is still elusive. Therefore, present study aimed to assess the quality of life of complex acetabulum fracture managed with combined anterior and posterior approach (dual approach) as well as the association of postoperative reduction and patient reported outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study was performed on 42 associated acetabular fracture patients with involvement of both columns, who were treated with a dual approach including combined anterior modified ilio-inguinal approach in combination with posterior Kocher-Langenbeck (K-L) approach in a single anaesthetic session having minimum two years follow-up. Postoperative reduction and radiological outcomes were assessed using Matta criteria. Functional outcome was assessed by a score system developed by Merle d'Aubigné-Postel. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 47.9 ± 11.95 years and mean follow-up period was 2.8 ± 0.49 years. Anatomical reduction was achieved in 32 (76.19%) cases in postoperative period. 8 (19.04%) cases had congruent and 2 (4.76%) had incongruent reduction. Radiological and functional outcome was excellent/good n = 35 (83.33%) cases. Patient-reported outcome on domains physical function and role physical showed a significant improvement between 6 to 24 months period (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The dual approach for complex acetabulum fracture with mid-term follow-up showed good to excellent radiological and functional outcomes. A significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes on Physical function and Role physical domains of SF-36 was also seen over the follow-up period.

A Radiological Comparison of Robotic-Assisted Versus Manual Techniques in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Purpose: This study investigates the radiological outcomes of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (RATHA) compared to manual total hip arthroplasty (mTHA), addressing the ongoing debate on the effectiveness of RATHA in achieving superior implant positioning accuracy. Methods: A prospective cohort of 212 patients (103 robotic, 109 manual) underwent THA and were evaluated for postoperative radiological outcomes, focusing on the inclination and anteversion angles of the acetabular cup. Outlier prevalence was assessed based on angles outside the defined Lewinnek safe zones. All post-operative measurements were made using the BoneNinja application. Results: High inter-observer and intra-observer reliabilities were observed, validating the measurement accuracy. The mean anteversion and inclination angles in the RATHA cohort were 40.5 ± 1.5 and 24.5 ± 3.1° respectively; and the mTHA cohort were 42.1 ± 4.9 and 24.9 ± 4.5°. There was a statistically significant difference in inclination angles between the two cohorts whereas the anteversion angles showed no difference. Majority of the conventional THRs (N = 72, 55.4%) were placed outside the safe zone for anteversion. The inclination angles revealed a highly significant difference between the cohorts (p < 0.0001), with all the robotic THRs (N = 121, 100%) being placed within the safe zone for inclination, whereas only 70% (N = 91) of the conventional THRs were within the safe zone. 97.5% of RA-THRs were within 3° of the proposed plan, demonstrating high accuracy. Conclusion: RATHA significantly outperforms MTHA in radiological accuracy, achieving precise acetabular cup positioning with minimal outliers. These results advocate for RATHA's adoption in THA to enhance outcome predictability and affirm its reliability and safety over manual methods.

Overloaded Vertebral Body Following Consecutive Three-Level Hybrid Surgery Comparing with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: Based on the varying number and relative positions of cervical disc replacement (CDR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures, three-segment hybrid surgery (HS) presents a diverse structural approach. Currently, the potential differential effects of HS with different segment combinations and surgical procedures on overloaded vertebral body (OVB) occurrence remain unexplored. The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of HS and ACDF in treating cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD), aiming to provide further insights into OVB. METHODS: This study included patients with three-level CDDD who underwent ACDF or HS at our institution. Eligible patients were divided into three groups: Type I (one-level CDR and two-level ACDF), Type II (two-level CDR and one-level ACDF), and ACDF (three-level ACDF). For radiographic analysis, patients were further divided into the Replacement Segment Group and the Nonreplacement Segment Group based on the presence of replacement segments above and below the OVB. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) scores for neck and arm pain, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, and neck disability index (NDI) scores. The cervical radiological parameters assessed included (1) vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA), (2) wedge angle (WA), (3) anterior vertebral height (AH), (4) posterior vertebral height (PH), and (5) Hounsfield unit (HU) values. Statistical methods included paired t-test, ANOVA test, and chi-square test. Independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare the differences between two groups according to the results of normal distribution test. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients, evenly distributed among three groups, were included and were well matched in terms of demographic characteristics. The likelihood of vertebral body collapse (VBC) was notably higher in the ACDF group (41.5%) compared with the Type I (17.9%) and Type II (8.9%) groups (p < 0.01). Following surgery, both at 3 and 6 months, the ACDF group demonstrated higher VAS neck scores and NDI scores compared with the Type I and Type II groups (p < 0.01). Additionally, the WA and AH values of the upper and lower adjacent OVB were consistently lower in the ACDF group than in the Type I and Type II groups at 6 and 12 months and at the final follow-up (p < 0.01). Notably, in the Nonreplacement Segment Group, WA significantly decreased at 12 months postoperatively and at the final follow-up compared with the Replacement Segment Group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Three levels of HS appear to reduce stress concentrations and alleviate morphological changes in OVB. The occurrence of more VBC patients with OVB was associated with the use of Zero-P or Zero-P VA implants.

Choice of Entry Point Does Not Affect Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Antegrade Intra-medullary Nailing in Patients with Shaft of Femur Fracture: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Purpose: The choice of entry point, Greater trochanter (GT), or Piriformis entry (PE) for antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN) of the femur is crucial. This study was performed to compare these two entry points in the patients with shaft of femur fractures regarding intra-operative parameters, radiological and functional outcomes. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four patients underwent GT entry nailing, while 25 patients underwent PE nailing. Surgical time, Intra-operative blood units transfused, Intra-operative fluoroscopy exposure by number of C-arm shots taken, mean drop in hemoglobin, and incidence of iatrogenic fracture were recorded. Patients were followed up at 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6 months to look for radiological healing and improvements in functional outcome using Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS). MRI of bilateral hips with pelvis was done in 25 patients at 6 months of follow-up to detect any preliminary signs of AVN. Results: The mean drop in hemoglobin in the GT group was significantly lesser than the PE group (p = 0.02). Mean MHHS at 4 weeks post-op was also significantly higher in the GT group (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference between both the groups regarding surgical duration, fluoroscopy exposure, radiological and functional outcomes in the long term. None of the patients who underwent MRI displayed any preliminary sign of AVN. Conclusion: GT entry nails lead to lesser surgical time, fluoroscopy exposure, and intra-operative blood loss. Both the nailing systems achieve excellent fracture unions and comparable functional outcomes in the long term, and there is a minuscule risk of AVN in adult patients undergoing IMN.

Evaluation of Radiological and Neurological Outcomes after Anterior Cervical Corpectomy with Fusion using Expandable Cage Alone and Expandable Cage with Anterior Cervical Plating.

Objective After anterior cervical corpectomy expandable cage were used with or without using anterior cervical plate for structural support are being preferred over autologous bone graft and other types of cages. Nowadays, the preferable type of cages and application of anterior cervical plate remain a debatable topic with studies giving divergent results. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of expandable cages used alone or expandable cage used with anterior cervical plate following anterior cervical corpectomy. Materials and Methods This study was conducted on 100 patients from January 2019 to December 2021 and all patients were undergone anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion and divided in two groups with expandable cage only (Group A) and expandable cage with anterior cervical plate (Group B). Various long-term benefits and radiological outcomes were studied in both groups. Statistical Analysis and Results In this study, 100 patients were included and all patients underwent corpectomy followed by insertion of expandable cage alone or with anterior cervical plate. There was an improvement in C2-C7 Cobb's angle in group B was significantly higher than group A ( p < 0.05) and decrease in Nurick's scale score in group B was significantly higher than group A ( p < 0.05). The outcomes were measured with fusion rate (94%), subsidence rate (15%) and change in C2-C7 Cobb's angle was 4 degrees in this study. Conclusion Expandable cage with or without anterior cervical plate was used after anterior cervical corpectomy for various cervical pathological conditions. In this study, we conclude the long-term benefits and radiological outcomes of two groups as expandable cage was used alone or with additional application of anterior cervical plate. In this study, the results were more in favor of additional application of anterior cervical plate as compared with expandable cage alone and more studies were required in future for more established long-term benefits and drawbacks.