Evaluating factors influencing community readiness for post-mining environmental development strategies.

This research delves into the complex factors that affect how ready a community is to embrace new environmental development strategies, which could significantly change the region's social and economic fabric. Using a structured questionnaire, exploratory factor analysis and logistic regression analysis, the study assesses how corporate practices in resource management, environmental governance, efforts to enhance community capabilities, and various demographic factors influence the community's willingness to adapt to change. Despite its intentions to benefit both the mining operations and the community, corporate resource management appears to have a paradoxical impact on the community's willingness to pursue new environmental paths. This negative impact can be attributed to the dependency it creates. Effective corporate resource management can lead to a community becoming heavily reliant on the stability and benefits provided by the mining company. This dependency fosters a sense of security and satisfaction with the status quo, making community members less inclined to explore or support new and potentially disruptive environmental strategies. The stability provided by the mine's resource management practices may inadvertently anchor the community to existing economic structures, reducing their impetus to seek alternative livelihoods or adapt to new socioeconomic conditions. However, it is essential to consider the limitations of this finding. One limitation is the potential bias in community perceptions, where immediate benefits from corporate resource management overshadow long-term considerations for sustainable development. Additionally, the context-specific nature of this study means that these findings may not be universally applicable to all mining communities.

Resource stewardship and Choosing Wisely in a children's hospital.

Objectives: Evidence suggests that approximately 30% of the tests and treatments currently prescribed in healthcare are potentially unnecessary, may not add value, and in some cases cause harm. We describe the evolution of our hospital's Choosing Wisely (CW) program over the first 5 years of existence, highlighting the enablers, challenges, and overall lessons learned with the goal of informing other healthcare providers about implementing resource stewardship initiatives in paediatric healthcare settings. Methods: We describe the development of de novo "top 5" CW lists of recommendations using anonymous surveys and Likert scale scoring. Composition and role of the steering committee, measurement of data and outcomes, and implementation strategies are outlined. Results: Many projects have resulted in a successful decrease in inappropriate utilization while simultaneously monitoring for unintended consequences. Examples include respiratory viral testing in the emergency department (ED) decreased by greater than 80%; ankle radiographs for children with ankle injuries decreased from 88% to 54%; and use of IVIG for treatment of typical ITP cases decreased from 88% to 55%. Early involvement focused within General Paediatrics and the ED, but later expanded to include perioperative services and paediatric subspecialties. Conclusions: An internally developed CW program in a children's hospital can reduce targeted areas of potentially unnecessary tests and treatments. Enablers include credible clinician champions, organizational leadership support, reliable measurement strategies, and dedicated resource stewardship education. The lessons learned may be generalizable to other paediatric healthcare settings and providers looking to introduce a similar approach to target unnecessary care in their own organizations.

Doctors as Resource Stewards? Translating High-Value, Cost-Conscious Care to the Consulting Room.

After many policy attempts to tackle the persistent rise in the costs of health care, physicians are increasingly seen as potentially effective resource stewards. Frameworks including the quadruple aim, value-based health care and choosing wisely underline the importance of positive engagement of the health care workforce in reinventing the system-paving the way to real affordability by defining the right care. Current programmes focus on educating future doctors to provide 'high-value, cost-conscious care' (HVCCC), which proponents believe is the future of sustainable medical practice. Such programmes, which aim to extend population-level allocation concerns to interactions between an individual doctor and patient, have generated lively debates about the ethics of expanding doctors' professional accountability. To empirically ground this discussion, we conducted a qualitative interview study to examine what happens when resource stewardship responsibilities are extended to the consulting room. Attempts to deliver HVCCC were found to involve inevitable trade-offs between benefits to the individual patient and (social) costs, medical uncertainty and efficiency, and between resource stewardship and trust. Physicians reconcile this by justifying good-value care in terms of what is in the best interest of individual patients-redefining the currency of value from monetary costs to a patient's quality of life, and cost-conscious care as reflective medical practice. Micro-level resource stewardship thus becomes a matter of working reflexively and reducing wasteful forms of care, rather than of making difficult choices about resource allocation.

Routine T4 No More? Reducing Excess Thyroid Hormone Testing at a Pediatric Tertiary Care Hospital.

OBJECTIVES: To promote resource stewardship in thyroid hormone testing at a pediatric tertiary care hospital. STUDY DESIGN: Quality improvement approaches generated 3 change ideas that were implemented simultaneously in the hospital electronic medical record: (1) a reflex free thyroxine (fT4), whereby fT4 is automatically reported if the thyroid-stimulating hormone is outside the normal range; (2) a forced-function for thyroid hormone ordering, whereby a provider must select an appropriate indication for ordering fT4 or triiodothyronine (T3); and (3) a clinical decision support message displayed at the time of ordering thyroid function tests. Laboratory data were audited to determine the mean number of fT4 and T3 tests performed per week as well as indications for testing. RESULTS: The mean number of fT4 and T3 tests processed per week decreased from 154 ± 21 and 11 ± 7, respectively, in the preintervention period, to 107 ± 12 (30% reduction) and 4 ± 3 (66% reduction) postintervention. These reductions were sustained for the full 20-week assessment period. Process and balancing measures revealed no unintended adverse consequences. Approximate cost savings were $43 000 per year. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the successful implementation of electronic medical record-based interventions (reflex fT4, forced-function selection of indication, decision support text) leading to sustained improvements in healthcare use, with significant associated cost-savings.

Toward High-Value, Cost-Conscious Care - Supporting Future Doctors to Adopt a Role as Stewards of a Sustainable Healthcare System.

PHENOMENON: In order to tackle the persistent rise of healthcare costs, physicians as "stewards of scarce resources" could be effective change agents, extending cost containment efforts from national policy to the micro level. Current programs focus on educating future doctors to deliver "high-value, cost-conscious care" (HVCCC). Although the importance of HVCCC education is increasingly recognized, there is a lag in implementation. Whereas recent efforts generated effective interventions that promote HVCCC in a local context, gaps persist in the examination of system factors that underlie broader successful and lasting implementation in educational and healthcare practices. APPROACH: We conducted a realist evaluation of a program focused on embedding HVCCC in postgraduate education by encouraging and supporting residents to set up "HVCCC projects" to promote HVCCC delivery. We interviewed 39 medical residents and 10 attending physicians involved in such HVCCC projects to examine HVCCC implementation in different educational and healthcare contexts. We held six reflection sessions attended by the program commissioners and educationalists to validate and enrich the findings. FINDINGS: A realist evaluation was used to unravel the facilitators and barriers that underlie the implementation of HVCCC in a variety of healthcare practices. Whereas research activities regularly stop after the identification of facilitators and barriers, we used these insights to formulate four high-value, cost-conscious care carriers: (1) continue to promote HVCCC awareness, (2) create an institutional structure that fosters HVCCC, (3) continue the focus on projects for embedding HVCCC in practice, (4) generate evidence. The carriers support residents, attendings and others involved in educating physicians in training to develop and implement innovative HVCCC projects. INSIGHTS: Strategies to promote physician stewardship go beyond the formal curriculum and require a transformation in the informal educational system from one that almost exclusively focuses on medical discussions to one that also considers value and cost as part of medical decision-making. The HVCCC carriers propose a set of strategies and system adaptations that could aid the transformation toward a HVCCC supporting context.

The Canadian Dermatology Association's Top Five Choosing Wisely Canada Recommendations.

INTRODUCTION: In this article, we present the Canadian Dermatology Association's (CDA) Choosing Wisely Canada (CWC) list of top "Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question in Dermatology" and the evidence in support of each recommendation. METHODS: Using a nominal technique, the CDA Working Group and Task Force generated an initial list based on literature review and expert consultation. After several rounds of list refinement via a modified Delphi process, a final list of recommendations was generated. These were approved by the CDA Board of Directors, presented at the CDA 93rd Annual Conference in 2018, and published by CWC in 2019. RESULTS: The top five recommendations are as follows: (1) Don't routinely prescribe antibiotics for bilateral lower leg redness and swelling; (2) Don't routinely prescribe topical combination corticosteroid/antifungal products; (3) Don't routinely use topical antibiotics on a surgical wound; (4) Don't prescribe systemic antifungals without mycological confirmation of dermatophyte infection; and (5) Don't use oral antibiotics for acne vulgaris for more than 3 months without assessing efficacy. DISCUSSION: This list of recommendations aims to encourage both physicians and patients to reevaluate ineffective, yet common, practices in treating dermatologic conditions. These recommendations represent actionable changes in practice, and therefore have considerable potential to enhance value-based care in dermatology. CONCLUSIONS: This list was developed to identify tangible changes in practice within dermatology that may reduce inefficiencies, prevent potential patient harm, and improve care. Future advocacy work may include updates, feedback obtainment, and patient care handouts, to continue to promote value-based healthcare and best practices.

Education for sustainable health care: From learning to professional practice.

A number of planetary boundaries, including climate change as a result of greenhouse gas emissions, has already been exceeded. This situation has deleterious consequences for public health. Paradoxically, 4.4% of these emissions are attributable to the healthcare sector. These problems have not been sufficiently acknowledged in health professions curricula. This paper addresses two main issues, humanistic learning and the application of knowledge acquisition to clinical practice. Humanistic learning principles can be used to emphasize learner-centered approaches, including knowledge acquisition and reflection to increase self-awareness. Applying humanistic principles in everyday life and clinical practice can encourage stewardship, assisting students to become agents for change. In terms of knowledge and skills application to clinical practice, an overview of varied and novel approaches of how sustainable education can be integrated at different stages of training across several health care professions is provided. The Health and Environment Adaptive Response Taskforce (HEART) platform as an example of creating empowered learners, the NurSusTOOLKIT, a multi-disciplinary collaboration offering free adaptable educational resources for educators and the Greener Anaesthesia and Sustainability Project (GASP), an example of bridging the transition to clinical practice, are described.

Communicating wisely: teaching residents to communicate effectively with patients and caregivers about unnecessary tests.

BACKGROUND: With rising healthcare costs and a focus on quality, there is a growing need to promote resource stewardship in medical education. Physicians need to be able to communicate effectively with patients/caregivers seeking tests and treatments that are unnecessary. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of an interactive workshop on residents' knowledge of resource stewardship and communication skills when counseling patients/caregivers about requests for unnecessary testing. METHODS: Participants were 83 Internal Medicine and Pediatrics residents at the University of Toronto in 2014-15. The evaluation compared resource stewardship knowledge and communication skills of 57 (69%) residents that attended the resource stewardship workshop to 26 residents (31%) who did not. Knowledge and communication skills assessment consisted of a written test and a structured assessment using standardized patient raters, respectively. A linear regression was applied to determine predictors of overall communication skills performance. RESULTS: Workshop attendance resulted in better performance on the knowledge test (4.3 ± 1.9 vs. 3.1 ± 1.7 out of 8, p = 0.01), but not better performance on the communication skills assessment (4.1 ± 0.8 vs. 4.0 ± 0.9 out of 5, p = 0.56). Higher training level (p = 0.01) and knowledge test scores (p = 0.046) were independent predictors of better overall communication skills, after adjusting for gender, training level, workshop attendance, knowledge and self-reported prior feedback on communication skills. CONCLUSIONS: An interactive workshop can improve knowledge of resource stewardship, but improving communication skills with patients/caregivers about unnecessary testing may require additional training or reinforcement in the clinical learning environment. These teaching and assessment approaches can support the integration of education on resource stewardship into medical education.

An educational forum to engage infectious diseases and microbiology residents in resource stewardship modelled after the Choosing Wisely campaign.

BACKGROUND: Rising costs present a major threat to the sustainability of health care delivery. Resource stewardship is increasingly becoming an expected competency of physicians. The Choosing Wisely framework was used to introduce resource stewardship at a national educational retreat for infectious disease and microbiology residents. METHODS: During the 2014 Annual Canadian Infectious Disease and Microbiology Resident Retreat in Toronto, Ontario, infectious disease (n=50) and microbiology (n=17) residents representing 11 Canadian universities from six provinces, were invited to participate in a modified Delphi panel. Participants were asked, in advance of the retreat, to submit up to five practices that infectious disease and microbiology specialists should not routinely perform due to lack of proven benefit(s) and/or potential harm to patients. Submissions were discussed in small and large group forums using an iterative approach involving electronic polling until consensus was reached for five practices. A finalized list was created for both educational purposes and for residents to consider enacting; however, it was not intended to replace formal society-endorsed statements. A follow-up survey at two-months was conducted. RESULTS: Consensus was reached by the residents regarding five low-value practices within the purview of infectious diseases and microbiology physicians. After the retreat, 20 participants (32%) completed the follow-up survey. The majority of respondents (75%) believed that the session was at least as relevant as other sessions they attended at the retreat, including 95% indicating that at least some of the material discussed was new to them. Since returning to their home institutions, nine (45%) respondents have incorporated what they learned into their daily practice; four (20%) reported that they have considered initiating a project related to the session; and one (5%) reported having initiated a project. CONCLUSIONS: The present educational forum demonstrated that trainees can become actively engaged in the identification and discussion of low-value practices. Embedding residence training programs with resource stewardship education will be necessary to improve the value of care offered by the future members of our profession.

HISTORIQUE: Les coûts croissants représentent une menace importante pour la pérennité des soins de santé. De plus en plus, on s'attend que les médecins aient les compétences nécessaires pour gérer les ressources. Lors d'une journée de réflexion nationale pour les résidents en infectiologie et en microbiologie, la gestion des ressources a été abordée conformément au cadre Choosing Wisely. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Pendant la journée de réflexion canadienne annuelle de 2014 pour les résidents en infectiologie et en microbiologie tenue à Toronto, en Ontario, des résidents en infectiologie (n=50) et en microbiologie (n=17) représentant 11 universités canadiennes réparties dans six provinces ont été invités à participer à un groupe Delphi modifié. Avant la journée de réflexion, ils ont été invités à soumettre jusqu'à cinq pratiques que les spécialistes de l'infectiologie ou de la microbiologie ne devraient pas effectuer systématiquement parce que leurs avantages ne sont pas démontrés ou qu'elles comportent des risques potentiels pour les patients. Ils ont examiné ces pratiques lors de forums en petits et grands groupes selon une méthode itérative par sondage électronique, jusqu'à atteindre un consensus pour cinq pratiques. Une liste définitive a été créée pour des besoins d'éducation et pour que les résidents envisagent de la respecter. Cette liste ne visait toutefois pas à remplacer les documents officiels approuvés par la Société. Un sondage de suivi a été effectué au bout de deux mois. RÉSULTATS: Les résidents sont parvenus à un consensus sur cinq pratiques de faible valeur qui relèvent des médecins en infectiologie et en microbiologie. Après la journée de réflexion, 20 participants (32 %) ont rempli le sondage de suivi. La majorité d'entre eux (75 %) trouvaient que cette séance était au moins aussi pertinente que les autres séances auxquelles ils avaient assisté pendant la journée de réflexion, et 95 % ont indiqué qu'au moins une partie de ce qui avait été abordé était nouveau pour eux. Depuis leur retour au sein de leur établissement, neuf (45 %) répondants avaient intégré ce qu'ils avaient appris à leur pratique, quatre (20 %) ont déclaré avoir envisagé un projet lié à la séance et un (5 %) a affirmé avoir lancé un projet. CONCLUSIONS: Le présent forum d'éducation a démontré que les résidents peuvent s'investir pour cerner les pratiques de faible valeur et en discuter. Il faudra intégrer la gérance de l'éducation aux programmes de résidence pour améliorer la valeur des soins offerts par les futurs membres de notre profession.

Upper Extremity Surgeon Recommendations for Imaging Do Not Correspond with Imaging Appropriateness Guidelines.

Background: Utilization of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) increases annually, raising concerns about overuse. Imaging appropriateness guidelines have the potential to standardize decisions regarding imaging based on best evidence, which might reduce unhelpful or potentially misleading imaging. We studied expert use of advanced imaging for musculoskeletal illness compared to published appropriateness recommendations. Methods: First, 15 imaging guidelines with recommendations for advanced imaging of the upper extremity were collated. Next, members of the Science of Variation Group (SOVG) were invited to participate in a survey of 11 patient scenarios of common upper extremity illnesses and asked whether they would recommend MRI or CT. Guideline recommendations for imaging were compared with surgeon recommendations using Fisher's exact tests. We used Fleiss' kappa to measure the interobserver agreement among surgeons. Results: For the 11 scenarios, most imaging appropriateness guidelines suggested that MRI or CT is useful, while most surgeons (n = 108) felt it was not. There was no correlation between surgeons and guidelines recommendations for imaging (ρ = 0.28; p = 0.40). There was slight agreement among surgeons regarding imaging recommendations (kappa: 0.17; 95% confidence interval: 0.023-0.32). Conclusion: The available imaging appropriateness guidelines appear to be too permissive and therefore seem to have limited clinical utility for upper extremity surgeons. The notable surgeon-to-surgeon variation (unreliability) in recommendations for advanced imaging in this and other studies suggests a role for strategies to ensure that patient decisions about imaging are consistent with their values (what matters most to them) and not unduly influenced by patient misconceptions about imaging or by surgeon beliefs and habits. Level Of Evidence: II, diagnostic.

Integrating Choosing Wisely, Value-Based Care Principles, Into Undergraduate Medical Education: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare spending represents a large portion of the GDP of the United States. Value-based care (VBC) seeks to decrease waste in health care spending, yet this concept is insufficiently taught to medical students. The Choosing Wisely Students and Trainees Advocating for Resource Stewardship (STARS) campaign promotes initiatives that integrate knowledge of VBC into undergraduate medical education (UME). This study sought to determine the most effective strategy to educate medical students on key principles of VBC as taught by the STARS campaign. METHODS: Choosing Wisely principles were incorporated into the UME curriculum of an academic medical institution via the creation of eight new learning objectives (LOs) for case-based learning (CBL) sessions and lectures. Medical students completed an annual 10-question survey from 2019 to 2022 and 10 formal examination questions during the preclinical (years 1 and 2) curriculum after exposure to varying quantities of LOs. Pearson correlation, chi-square, and logistic regression were employed to determine the association between increased LOs in the curriculum and (1) campaign awareness and (2) knowledge of VBC principles. RESULTS: A total of 700 survey responses over a four-year period (2019 to 2022) were analyzed. Student awareness of the campaign and knowledge of VBC principles increased year over year during the survey period (39% to 92% and 64% to 74%, respectively). There were significant associations between increased LOs in the curriculum and (1) campaign awareness (0.828, p<0.0001) and (2) knowledge of VBC principles (0.934, p<0.001). Students also performed well on formal examination questions related to VBC principles (mean: 81.5% and mean discrimination index: 0.18). CONCLUSION: Integration of VBC-focused LOs is significantly associated with awareness of the Choosing Wisely STARS campaign and knowledge of VBC principles taught by the campaign. Collaborative initiatives to increase exposure to VBC education may improve students' knowledge of these principles during medical school.

Patterns of diabetes testing for older adults without diabetes in Ontario's nursing homes: A population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic diabetes testing may be of limited value for older nursing home residents, but most diabetes guidelines lack upper-age cutoffs for screening cessation. We evaluated patterns of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and serum blood glucose (SBG) testing among older residents without diabetes in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: This population-based retrospective cohort study used provincial health administrative data from ICES to identify older nursing home residents in Ontario without diabetes between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018. We examined HbA1c and glucose testing rates overall, by age, sex, and near end-of-life. The number of tests needed to identify one case of diabetes (using HbA1c thresholds of 6.5% and 8.0%) were also calculated. RESULTS: Among 102,923 older nursing home residents (70.3% women; average age 85.6 ± SD 7.7 years), 46.1% of residents received ≥1 HbA1c test over an average follow-up period of 2.15 (± SD 1.49) years, and 18.2% of these tested residents received ≥4 HbA1c tests. The crude HbA1c testing rate was 52.6 tests/100 person-years (95% CI 52.3-52.9). Testing rates among residents aged ≥80 years was 50.7 HbA1c tests/100 person-years (95% CI 50.4-51.0), and 47.8 tests/100 person-years (95% CI 46.5-49.0) among residents near end-of-life. The number of tests to identify a case of diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 6.5%) was 44, while the number of tests to identify a case of actionable diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 8%) was 310. Less than 1% of residents with an HbA1c test met criteria for actionable diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing home residents without diabetes receive frequent diabetes testing, with high testing rates even in residents over 80 years old and residents near end-of-life. The high number of tests needed to identify a case of actionable diabetes highlights the urgent need to re-evaluate diabetes testing practices in nursing homes.

A Multimodal Intervention for Reducing Unnecessary Repeat Glycated Hemoglobin Testing.

OBJECTIVES: Reducing unnecessary tests that do not enhance quality can promote health-care value. Glycated hemoglobin (A1C) is often ordered at a frequency exceeding the recommendation of once every 3 months. We conducted a quality improvement (QI) initiative aimed to reduce unnecessary repeat testing by 75% at a tertiary care academic hospital. METHODS: A retrospective baseline analysis was conducted on laboratory data from 2019 that enumerated unnecessary A1C tests, defined as repeat tests ordered within 60 days. A multifaceted change intervention with iterative plan-do-study-act cycles was introduced in March 2019 to educate providers and to automatically cancel A1C tests requested within 60 days. Monthly totals of A1C testing processed were plotted on statistical process control charts. RESULTS: In 2019, 11% of all A1C tests ordered were unnecessary. Between March 2020 and January 2021, 11% of the tests (N=14,247 tests) were unnecessary, of which 84% were cancelled with our intervention. Providers in cardiology and nephrology accounted for over half (55%) of the unnecessary tests ordered. CONCLUSIONS: A 2-pronged approach informed by root-cause analysis, and comprised of gatekeeping and provider education, can effectively promote resource stewardship for reducing unnecessary A1C testing.

Reduction of urea test ordering in the emergency department: multicomponent intervention including education, electronic ordering, and data feedback.

INTRODUCTION: In the emergency department (ED), laboratory testing accounts for a significant portion of the medical assessment. Although excess laboratory test ordering has been proven to be prevalent, different types of interventions have been used to encourage a behavioural change in how physicians order tests. In one western Canadian hospital medicine program, a quality improvement project aimed to reduce the total monthly blood urea nitrogen (BUN) test ordered by physicians was found to be successful. The objective of this project was to evaluate a similar multicomponent intervention aimed at ED physician ordering, with the primary goal of reducing the number of monthly BUN tests ordered per ED visit. METHODS: A pre post intervention design was conducted over 12-months. The first intervention component was an educational presentation conducted by physician leaders. Second, a regularly used order panel within the ED electronic order system was modified, removing the BUN test. The third component involved audit and feedback; the total monthly BUN test ordered for the ED department post intervention start was shared with all ED physicians twice (at 5 and 12 months).An interrupted time series analysis was completed to evaluate the multicomponent intervention effect. RESULTS: The total monthly ordered BUN test declined from an average of 1905 pre-intervention to 448 post-intervention, and the total monthly BUN test to total ED visit ratio declined from 0.46 to 0.1. These results were a statistically significant reduction in physician BUN test ordering. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted education, order panel design and data feedback interventions can impact physician ordering behaviour in the emergent healthcare context, where diagnostic tests are often over used.

RéSUMé: INTRODUCTION: Dans les services d'urgence (SU), les analyses de laboratoire représentent une part importante de l'évaluation médicale. Bien qu'il ait été prouvé que la prescription excessive d'examens de laboratoire est répandue, différents types d'interventions ont été utilisés pour encourager un changement de comportement dans la façon dont les médecins commandent des examens. Dans un programme de médecine hospitalière de l'Ouest canadien, un projet d'amélioration de la qualité visant à réduire le nombre total de tests mensuels d'azote uréique du sang (BUN) demandés par les médecins s'est avéré fructueux. L'objectif de ce projet était d'évaluer une intervention similaire à plusieurs composantes visant les ordonnances des médecins des urgences, avec pour objectif principal de réduire le nombre d'analyses mensuelles de BUN commandés par visite aux urgences. MéTHODE: Une conception pré-post-intervention a été menée sur 12 mois. Le premier volet de l'intervention consistait en une présentation éducative menée par des médecins chefs de file. Deuxièmement, un panneau de commande régulièrement utilisé dans le système de commande électronique du SU a été modifié, supprimant le test BUN. Le troisième volet concernait l'audit et le retour d'information : le nombre total de tests mensuels d'azote uréique sanguin commandés pour le service des urgences après le début de l'intervention a été communiqué à tous les médecins des urgences à deux reprises (à 5 et 12 mois). Une analyse de séries chronologiques interrompues a été réalisée pour évaluer l'effet de l'intervention multicomposante. RéSULTATS: Le nombre total mensuel d'analyses BUN commandés a baissé d'une moyenne de 1905 avant l'intervention à 448 après l'intervention, et le rapport entre le nombre total mensuel de test BUN et le nombre total de visites aux urgences a baissé de 0,46 à 0,1. Ces résultats représentaient une réduction statistiquement significative des ordonnances de test BUN par les médecins. CONCLUSIONS: Des interventions ciblées en matière d'éducation, de conception de panels de commandes et de retour d'informations peuvent avoir un impact sur le comportement des médecins en matière de commandes dans le contexte des soins de santé émergents, où les tests de diagnostic sont souvent surutilisés.

The Effectiveness of an Interprofessional Education Course in Teaching the Importance of Choosing Wisely and Resource Stewardship: A Pilot Study.

Objectives Rising health care costs and an increase in unnecessary testing have sparked interest in resource stewardship (RS) and subsequently the Choosing Wisely Canada (CWC) campaign. Currently, all Canadian medical schools have student representatives for CWC; however, the same is not true in other health professions. Interprofessional care learned through interprofessional education (IPE) can lead to better patient outcomes. This study assessed whether an IPE course for health profession students was effective in teaching undergraduate students both interprofessional competencies and CWC principles. Methods An approximately seven-hour-long, four-session course was administered to Dalhousie University health profession students (N= 30). A validated survey for IPE competencies and a general survey about CWC principles were administered to assess the course. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the general CWC views, and paired samples t-tests were employed to compare pre- and post-IPE competencies. Results The full survey was completed by 25 (83%) students. Of these, 52% were female, within five health disciplines, and 13 (52%) had heard of CWC prior. Overall, the students agreed that CWC was important and relevant to their profession. They also reported significant improvements in multiple IPE competencies, including communication, collaboration, roles and responsibilities, patient-/family-centered care, conflict management/resolution, and team function. Conclusion Participants in our pilot Choosing Wisely IPE course valued the importance of the CWC campaign and reported improvement in multiple IPE competencies. This adaptable, simple, and low-cost course may be an effective way to integrate RS teaching across multiple health professions.

What the COVID-19 Pandemic Can Teach Us About Resource Stewardship and Quality in Health Care.

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has forever changed how we view health care service delivery. Although there are undoubtedly some unintended consequences that will result from current health care service reallocation, it provides a unique opportunity to consider how to deliver quality care currently, and after the pandemic. In the context of lessons learned, moving forward some of what was previously routine could remain reserved for more exceptional circumstances. To determine what is "routine," what is "essential," and what is "exceptional," it is necessary to view medical decisions within the paradigm of high-quality care. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement definition of the dimensions of quality is based on whether the care is safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, efficient, and equitable. This type of stewardship has been applied to many interventions already deemed unnecessary by organizations such as the Choosing Wisely initiative, but the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic provides a lens from which to consider other aspects of care. The following will provide examples from Allergy/Immunology that outline how we can reconsider what quality means in the post-coronavirus disease health care system.

How artificial intelligence can help us 'Choose Wisely'.

The overuse of low value medical tests and treatments drives costs and patient harm. Efforts to address overuse, such as Choosing Wisely campaigns, typically rely on passive implementation strategies- a form of low reliability system change. Embedding guidelines into clinical decision support (CDS) software is a higher leverage approach to provide ordering suggestions through an interface embedded within the clinical workflow. Growth in computing power is increasingly enabling artificial intelligence (AI) to augment such decision making tools. This article offers a roadmap of opportunities for AI-enabled CDS to reduce overuse, which are presented according to a patient's journey of care.

Reducing day 3 baseline monitoring bloodwork and ultrasound for patients undergoing timed intercourse and intrauterine insemination treatment cycles.

BACKGROUND: In the current context of a global pandemic it is imperative for fertility clinics to consider the necessity of individual tests and eliminate those that have limited utility and may impose unnecessary risk of exposure. The purpose of this study was to implement and evaluate a multi-modal quality improvement (QI) strategy to promote resource stewardship by reducing routine day 3 (d3) bloodwork and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) for patients undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI) and timed intercourse (IC) treatment cycles. METHODS: After literature review, clinic stakeholders at an academic fertility centre met to discuss d3 testing utility and factors contributing to d3 bloodwork/TVUS in IC/IUI treatment cycles. Consensus was reached that it was unnecessary in patients taking oral/no medications. The primary intervention changed the default setting on the electronic order set to exclude d3 testing for IC/IUI cycles with oral/no medications. Exceptions required active test selection. Protocols were updated and education sessions were held. The main outcome measure was the proportion of cycles receiving d3 bloodwork/TVUS during the 8-week post-intervention period compared with the 8-week pre-intervention period. Balancing measures included provider satisfaction, pregnancy rates, and incidence of cycle cancellation. RESULTS: A significant reduction in the proportion of cycles receiving d3 TVUS (57.2% vs 20.8%, p < 0.001) and ≥ 1 blood test (58.6% vs 22.8%, p < 0.001) was observed post-intervention. There was no significant difference in cycle cancellation or pregnancy rates pre- and post-intervention (p = 0.86). Treatment with medications, cyst history, prescribing physician, and treatment centre were associated with receiving d3 bloodwork/TVUS. 74% of providers were satisfied with the intervention. CONCLUSION: A significant reduction in IC/IUI treatment cycles that received d3 bloodwork/TVUS was achieved without measured negative treatment impacts. During a pandemic, eliminating routine d3 bloodwork/TVUS represents a safe way to reduce monitoring appointments and exposure.

Impact of Rejection of Low-Quality Wound Swabs on Antimicrobial Prescribing: A Controlled Before-After Study.

In this controlled before-after study, wound swabs were only processed for culture, identification, and susceptibility testing if a quality metric, determined by the Q score, was met. Rejection of low-quality wound swabs resulted in a modest decrease in reflexive antibiotic initiation while reducing laboratory workload and generating few clinician requests.