RESUMO
Aim of the study: Despite the excellent effectiveness of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) in the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, still a few percent of patients fail therapy. The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of triple vs double rescue treatment in such a population. Material and methods: The study included all consecutive DAA-experienced patients retreated with pangenotypic options from the EpiTer-2 database, a retrospective national multicenter real-world project evaluating antiviral treatment in HCV-infected patients in 2015-2023. Results: The studied population consisted of 269 patients, of whom 208 were treated with the double (P2) and 61 with the triple (P3) pangenotypic option. No statistically significant differences were found between these subpopulations, except a significantly more frequent history of liver transplantation in the P3 group (6.6% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.01). In the P2 group, two-thirds of patients were treated with velpatasvir/sofosbuvir, while in the P3 group the majority of patients received a combination of velpatasvir/sofosbuvir/voxilaprevir. Virological response at the end of therapy was comparable in both analyzed subpopulations, but the sustained virologic response (SVR) rate was significantly higher in triple retherapy, 98.3% vs. 88.7%, p = 0.02, calculated after exclusion of patients lost to follow-up. Lower SVR was achieved in genotype 3-infected men with cirrhosis, 88.9% and 80% in P3 and P2, respectively. Conclusions: A comparison of double and triple pangenotypic retherapy in patients after failure of DAA therapy showed a higher sustained virological response in the triple option with a comparable response at the end of therapy. The factors reducing the chances of cure were cirrhosis, genotype 3 infection and male gender.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIM: HER2-positive breast cancers eventually relapse in about one third of patients. Is anti-HER2-directed therapy with Herceptin® (trastuzumab) effective in re-treatment? Between 2008 and 2018, 216 patients with recurrent HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) were re-treated with Herceptin (HER) during first-line therapy. This study assessed the effectiveness and tolerability of re-treatment with HER. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After approval from Ethical committee, the NIS was conducted according to German Drug Act. Re-treatment with HER was documented at routine visits starting with a basic observational period of maximum 12 months and a follow-up period of maximum additional four years. RESULTS: HER2-positive BC relapsed after a median of 36.5 months (mos). Patients were re-treated with HER +/- chemotherapy +/- endocrine therapy. HER-containing regimens resulted in median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 12.7 (95%CI=10.5-14.8) mos and overall survival (OS-2) of 31.6 mos (95%CI=28.8-38.4) since recurrence diagnosis. Differentiation of recurrence types (local, visceral, non-visceral) unfolded worst prognosis for patients with visceral metastases. Cardiac monitoring within this non-interventional study (NIS) did not result in new safety concerns. CONCLUSION: Re-therapy with HER in the first-line setting of advanced HER2-positive breast cancer is effective and without unexpected or intensified adverse events.