Kidney retransplantation outcomes in adults aged 70 and older: Analysis of risk factors and survival.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of older patients are undergoing kidney transplant. Because of a finite longevity, more patients will be faced with failing allografts. At present there is a limited understanding of the benefits and risks associated with kidney retransplantation in this challenging population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database of all adults ≥70 undergoing kidney retransplant from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2022. We examined patient and graft survival of retransplanted patients compared to first time transplants. We also analyzed the risk factors that impacted the survival. RESULTS: During the study period there has been a significant rise in the number of retransplants performed, with 631 patients undergoing the procedure. Although clinically insignificant, overall graft, and patient survival rates were slightly lower in the retransplant group compared to the primary transplant group. With retransplant, patient survival was 91.3%, 75.6%, and 56.9% compared to 93.4%, 81.4%, and 64.4% with primary transplant at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. With retransplant, graft survival was 89.5%, 73.5%, 57.4% compared to 91.5%, 79.0%, and 63.6% in a primary transplant group at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that factors predicting poor survival included longer time on dialysis before retransplantation and decreased functional capacity. No survival difference was noted between recipients of deceased versus living donor kidneys. Patients who underwent retransplantation before initiating dialysis had better patient and graft survival. CONCLUSION: Patients aged ≥70 achieve satisfactory outcomes following kidney retransplantation, highlighting that chronologic age should not preclude this medically complex population from this life-saving procedure. Improvement in functional status and timely retransplantation are the key factors to successful outcome.

Performance status at the time of lung retransplant predicts long-term function.

BACKGROUND: Lung retransplantation is offered to select patients with chronic allograft dysfunction. Given the increased risk of morbidity and mortality conferred by retransplantation, post-transplant function should be considered in the decision of who and when to list. The aim of this study is to identify predictors of post-operative disability in patients undergoing lung retransplantation. METHODS: Data were collected from the UNOS national dataset and included all patients who underwent lung retransplant from May 2005-March 2023. Pre- and post-operative function was reported by the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and patients were stratified based on their needs. Cumulative link mixed effects models identified associations between pre-transplant variables and post-transplant function. RESULTS: A total of 1275 lung retransplant patients were included. After adjusting for between-group differences, pre-operative functional status was predictive of post-transplant function; patients requiring Total Assistance ( n = 740) were 74% more likely than No/Some Assistance patients (n = 535) to require more assistance in follow-up (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.13-2.68, p = .012). Estimated one year survival of Total Assistance patients is lower than No/Some Assistance Recipients (72% vs. 82%, CI 69%-75%; 79%-86%) but similar to overall re-transplant survival (76%, CI 74%-79%). CONCLUSION: Both survival and regain of function in patients requiring Total Assistance prior to retransplant may be higher than previously reported. Pre-operative functional status is predictive of post-operative function and should weigh in the selection, timing and post-operative care of patients considered for lung retransplantation.

Primary hyperoxaluria: Long-term outcomes of isolated kidney versus simultaneous liver/kidney transplant.

OBJECTIVES: To compare long-term transplant outcomes (organ rejection and retransplant) of simultaneous liver/kidney transplant (SLK) versus isolated kidney transplant (IK) for patients with primary hyperoxaluria (PH). METHODS: The Rare Kidney Stone Consortium PH registry was queried to identify patients with PH who underwent SLK or IK from 1999 to 2021. Patient characteristics and long-term transplant outcomes were abstracted and analyzed. Statistical comparisons were performed with Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: We identified 250 patients with PH, of whom 35 received care at Mayo Clinic and underwent SLK or IK. Patients who underwent SLK as their index transplant had lower odds of kidney rejection than did those who underwent IK (hazard ratio [HR], 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08-0.99; p = .048). The immunoprotective effect of concomitant liver and kidney transplant appeared to enhance outcomes for patients with PH. Additionally, the odds of retransplant were significantly lower for patients who underwent SLK as their index transplant than for those who underwent IK (HR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02-0.42; p = .003). Of five patients who underwent IK and had maintained graft function for at least 5 years after transplant, three (60%) had documented vitamin B6 responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PH who underwent SLK had a lower risk of kidney rejection and retransplant than those who underwent IK. Accurate genetic assessment for vitamin B6 responsiveness may optimize IK allocation. Novel therapeutics, such as lumasiran, have been introduced as promising agents for the management of PH.

Trajectories of patients relisted for liver transplantation.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Recurrent cirrhosis complicates 10-30% of Liver transplants (LT) and can lead to consideration for re-transplantation. We evaluated the trajectories of relisted versus primary listed patients on the waitlist using a competing risk framework. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined 1,912 patients listed for LT at our centre between from 2012 to 2020. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess overall survival (OS) by listing type and competing risk analysis Fine-Gray models were used to assess cumulative incidence of transplant by listing type. RESULTS: 1,731 patients were included (104 relisted). 44.2% of relisted patients received exception points vs. 19.8% of primary listed patients (p<0.001). Patients relisted without exceptions, representing those with graft cirrhosis, had the worst OS (HR: 4.17, 95%CI 2.63 - 6.67, p=<0.0001) and lowest instantaneous rate of transplant (HR: 0.56, 95%CI 0.38 - 0.83, p=0.006) than primary listed with exception points. On multivariate analysis listing type, height, bilirubin and INR were associated with cumulative incidence of transplant, while listing type, bilirubin, INR, sodium, creatinine were associated with OS. Within relisted patients, there was a trend towards higher mortality (HR: 1.79, 95%CI 0.91 - 3.52, p=0.08) and low transplant incidence (HR: 0.51, 95%CI 0.22 - 1.15, p=0.07) for graft cirrhosis vs other relisting indications. CONCLUSIONS: Patients relisted for LT are carefully curated and comprise a minority of the waitlist population. Despite their younger age, they have worse liver/kidney function, poor waitlist survival, and decreased transplant incidence suggesting the need for early relisting, while considering standardized exception points.

Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Retransplantation: United Network for Organ Sharing Data With Linked Primary and Retransplant.

INTRODUCTION: There are several articles exploring the risk factors for primary delayed graft function (DGF). However, current literature does not include many resources on the risk factors for DGF when it is a recipient's second kidney transplant or look at short-term graft and patient survival of DGF retransplants. METHODS: United Network for Organ Sharing data from January 2008 to June 2021 were analyzed. Pancreas transplants, multi-organ transplants, and lost to follow-up transplants were excluded. Second transplant patients with DGF were identified. Multivariate logistic regression models based on the primary and second transplant characteristics were created. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier methodology and assessed with log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 2964 second kidney transplants were identified. Rate of DGF in the second transplant was 28.4% (843/2964) and 49.2% of them had a prior DGF in their first transplant (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that occurrence of DGF (odds ratio [OR] 1.5, P < 0.001) and graft loss due to acute rejection (OR 1.2, P < 0.005) in the primary transplant were predictors of reappearing DGF in the second transplant. Dialysis at transplant was the greatest risk factor from the second transplant (OR 3.539, P < 0.001). There was a decreased graft survival after 12 mo (77% versus 49% with log t-test <0.001) in the second transplant. However, DGF was not significantly associated with patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the interaction between primary and second transplant in developing DGF. Survival analysis shows lower graft survival for retransplants in the case of DGF. This study opens the possibility of identifying additional risk factors for patients undergoing retransplant surgeries.

Differences between kidney retransplant recipients as identified by machine learning consensus clustering.

BACKGROUND: Our study aimed to characterize kidney retransplant recipients using an unsupervised machine-learning approach. METHODS: We performed consensus cluster analysis based on the recipient-, donor-, and transplant-related characteristics in 17 443 kidney retransplant recipients in the OPTN/UNOS database from 2010 to 2019. We identified each cluster's key characteristics using the standardized mean difference of >.3. We compared the posttransplant outcomes, including death-censored graft failure and patient death among the assigned clusters RESULTS: Consensus cluster analysis identified three distinct clusters of kidney retransplant recipients. Cluster 1 recipients were predominantly white and were less sensitized. They were most likely to receive a living donor kidney transplant and more likely to be preemptive (30%) or need ≤1 year of dialysis (32%). In contrast, cluster 2 recipients were the most sensitized (median PRA 95%). They were more likely to have been on dialysis >1 year, and receive a nationally allocated, low HLA mismatch, standard KDPI deceased donor kidney. Recipients in cluster 3 were more likely to be minorities (37% Black; 15% Hispanic). They were moderately sensitized with a median PRA of 87% and were also most likely to have been on dialysis >1 year. They received locally allocated high HLA mismatch kidneys from standard KDPI deceased donors. Thymoglobulin was the most commonly used induction agent for all three clusters. Cluster 1 had the most favorable patient and graft survival, while cluster 3 had the worst patient and graft survival. CONCLUSION: The use of an unsupervised machine learning approach characterized kidney retransplant recipients into three clinically distinct clusters with differing posttransplant outcomes. Recipients with moderate allosensitization, such as those represented in cluster 3, are perhaps more disadvantaged in the kidney retransplantation process. Potential opportunities for improvement specific to these re-transplant recipients include working to improve opportunities to improve access to living donor kidney transplantation, living donor paired exchange and identifying strategies for better HLA matching.

Impact of Calcineurin Inhibitor-Based Immunosuppression Maintenance During the Dialysis Period After Kidney Transplant Failure on the Next Kidney Graft Outcome: A Retrospective Multicenter Study With Propensity Score Analysis.

The impact of immunosuppressive therapy (IS) strategies after kidney transplant failure (KTF) on potential future new grafts is poorly established. We assessed the potential benefit of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based IS maintenance throughout the dialysis period on the outcome of the second kidney transplant (KT). We identified 407 patients who underwent a second KT between January 2008 and December 2018 at four French KT centers. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to control for potential confounding. We included 205 patients with similar baseline characteristics at KTF: a total of 53 received at least CNIs on the retransplant day (G-CNI), and 152 did not receive any IS (G-STOP). On the retransplant date, G-STOP patients experienced a longer pretransplant dialysis time, were more often hyperimmunized, and underwent more expanded-criteria donor KTs than G-CNI patients. During the second KT follow-up period, rejection episodes were similar in both groups. The 10-year survival rates without death and dialysis were 98.7% and 59.5% in G-CNI and G-STOP patients, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, CNI-based IS maintenance was associated with better survival (hazard ratio: 0.08; 95% confidence interval: 0.01-0.58, p = 0.01). CNI-based IS maintenance throughout the dialysis period after KTF may improve retransplantation outcomes.

Mortality and Morbidity Among Adult Liver Retransplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) is life-saving procedure for patients with end-stage liver failure with up to 20% of patients suffering graft failure following primary transplantation. Retransplantation (ReLT) remains the only definitive treatment for irreversible graft failure. AIMS: We aimed to explore the postoperative outcomes following liver ReLT. METHODS: Patients who had received a liver transplant between 2003 and 2016 were retrospectively identified using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTRs). Patients were stratified based on previous liver transplant history. The primary outcomes of this study were 5-year postoperative mortality, morbidity, and length of hospital stay following LT. RESULTS: 60,554 (96%) recipients were first LT recipients and 2524 (4%) were ReLT recipients. Compared with first LT, ReLT recipients had significantly higher rates of mortality (OR 1.93, 95%CI 1.76-2.12), overall morbidity (OR 1.80, 95%CI 1.65-1.96), and prolonged length of stay (OR 1.66, 95%CI 1.52-1.81) on multivariate analysis. Morbidity including cardiovascular (CVD) complications (OR 1.32, 95%CI 1.08-1.60), graft failure (OR 2.18, 95%CI 1.84-2.57), infection (OR 2.13, 95%CI 1.82-2.50), and hemorrhage (OR 2.67, 95%CI 2.00-3.61) were significantly greater in ReLT recipients. Compared to first LT, ReLT patients had a significant increase in overall 5-year mortality (p < 0.001), 5-year mortality due to CVD complications (p < 0.001), infection (p = 0.009), but not graft failure (p = 0.3543). CONCLUSION: ReLT is associated with higher rates of 5-year mortality, overall morbidity, CVD morbidity, infection, and graft failure. Higher 5-year mortality in ReLT is due to CVD and infections. These results could be used in preoperative patient assessment and prognostic counseling for ReLT.

Normothermic Machine Perfusion-Improving the Supply of Transplantable Livers for High-Risk Recipients.

The effectiveness of liver transplantation to cure numerous diseases, alleviate suffering, and improve patient survival has led to an ever increasing demand. Improvements in preoperative management, surgical technique, and postoperative care have allowed increasingly complicated and high-risk patients to be safely transplanted. As a result, many patients are safely transplanted in the modern era that would have been considered untransplantable in times gone by. Despite this, more gains are possible as the science behind transplantation is increasingly understood. Normothermic machine perfusion of liver grafts builds on these gains further by increasing the safe use of grafts with suboptimal features, through objective assessment of both hepatocyte and cholangiocyte function. This technology can minimize cold ischemia, but prolong total preservation time, with particular benefits for suboptimal grafts and surgically challenging recipients. In addition to more physiological and favorable preservation conditions for grafts with risk factors for poor outcome, the extended preservation time benefits operative logistics by allowing a careful explant and complicated vascular reconstruction when presented with challenging surgical scenarios. This technology represents a significant advancement in graft preservation techniques and the transplant community must continue to incorporate this technology to ensure the benefits of liver transplant are maximized.

Practice patterns and influence of allograft nephrectomy in pediatric kidney re-transplantation: A pediatric nephrology research consortium study.

INTRODUCTION: There are no guidelines regarding management of failed pediatric renal transplants. MATERIALS & METHODS: We performed a first of its kind multicenter study assessing prevalence of transplant nephrectomy, patient characteristics, and outcomes in pediatric renal transplant recipients with graft failure from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2016. RESULTS: Fourteen centers contributed data on 186 pediatric recipients with failed transplants. The 76 recipients that underwent transplant nephrectomy were not significantly different from the 110 without nephrectomy in donor or recipient demographics. Fifty-three percent of graft nephrectomies were within a year of transplant. Graft tenderness prompted transplant nephrectomy in 91% (P < .001). Patients that underwent nephrectomy were more likely to have a prior diagnosis of rejection within 3 months (43% vs 29%; P = .04). Nephrectomy of allografts did not affect time to re-listing, donor source at re-transplant but significantly decreased time to (P = .009) and incidence (P = .0002) of complete cessation of immunosuppression post-graft failure. Following transplant nephrectomy, recipients were significantly more likely to have rejection after re-transplant (18% vs 7%; P = .03) and multiple rejections in first year after re-transplant (7% vs 1%; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Practices pertaining to failed renal allografts are inconsistent-40% of failed pediatric renal allografts underwent nephrectomy. Graft tenderness frequently prompted transplant nephrectomy. There is no apparent benefit to graft nephrectomy related to sensitization; but timing / frequency of immunosuppression withdrawal is significantly different with slightly increased risk for rejection following re-transplant.

Adults transplanted as children as retransplant candidates: Analysis of outcomes support optimism in a population mislabeled as high risk.

Adult liver transplant programs have heretofore been hesitant to perform liver retransplantation in adult patients who underwent primary liver transplantation as a child (P_A). Areas of concern include: (a) potential disruption in care when transferring from a pediatric to an adult transplant center; (b) generally inferior outcomes of retransplantation; (c) reputation of young adults for non-adherence to post-transplant regimen; and (d) potential higher work effort for equivalent outcomes. To examine these concerns, we reviewed data on all US liver adult retransplants from 10/01/1987 to 9/30/2017. We propensity matched the P_A patients to patients who received both primary and retransplantation as adults (A_A), with ≥550 days between transplants. A mixed Cox proportional hazards model with program size and time period of transplantation as random variables revealed that retransplantation of P_A patients produced no significantly different graft survival or patient survival rates than retransplantation of the matched A_A patients. Therefore, inferior rates of liver retransplantation in these patients and concerns about continuity of care in changing transplant programs are not as believed in the wider liver transplant community. In conclusion, liver transplant centers should be optimistic about retransplanting adults who received their primary transplants as children.

Time to second kidney transplantation in young adults after failed pediatric kidney transplant.

BACKGROUND: Under the current kidney allocation system, pediatric candidates listed prior to age 18 receive priority for high-quality deceased donor organs. This has resulted in a decline in living donor transplantation in pediatrics, despite superior outcomes of living donor transplantation. Due to a young age at transplantation, most pediatric kidney transplant recipients require re-transplantation. The effects of a previously failed deceased donor vs a previously failed living donor on re-transplant candidates are unknown. METHODS: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we examined 2772 re-transplant recipients aged 18-30 years at time of relisting for second KT from 2000 to 2018 with history of prior pediatric KT (age ≤ 18 years). RESULTS: PFLDKT recipients compared to those with PFDDKT had shorter median waiting times and dialysis time regardless of their second donor type (14.0 vs 20.3 months, and 19.1 vs 34.5 months, respectively). PFLDKT recipients had higher re-transplant rates (adjusted HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.09-1.27, and adjusted HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.15 when calculating from time of relisting and time of returning to dialysis, respectively). PFDDKT recipients were more likely to have higher median PRA levels (90% vs 73%). CONCLUSIONS: Re-transplant candidates who received a previous deceased donor as a child had a higher level of sensitization, longer waiting time, and dialysis exposure compared to those with PFLDKT. Among primary pediatric kidney transplant candidates, consideration should be considered for living donor transplantation, despite the priority for deceased donor organs, to avoid increased sensitization and longer waiting times for with re-transplantation.

Re-transplants compared to primary kidney transplants recipients: a mate kidney paired analysis of the OPTN/UNOS database.

Outcomes of kidney re-transplant recipients (RTR) were compared to primary recipients (FTR) from paired donor kidneys. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database was used to identify deceased donors (n = 6266) who donated one kidney to an RTR and the mate kidney to an FTR between January 2000 to December 2010. As compared to FTR, RTR were younger (45 vs. 52 yr, p < 0.001) and had higher proportion of plasma reactive antibody >80 (25% vs 7%, p < 0.001). There were higher 0 mismatches in RTR (19% vs. 16%, p < 0.001). There were more pre-emptive transplants in RTR (24% vs. 21%, p = 0.002). Delayed graft function (28% vs. 25%, p = 0.007) was higher in RTR. Patient survival was similar in FTR and RTR groups at one, three, and five yr (95.7%, 90.2%, and 82.5% vs. 95.2%, 89.8% and 82.7%). Allograft survival rates were higher in FTR group compared to RTR group at one, three, and five yr (91.1%, 82.4%, and 70.9% vs. 87.8%, 77.4%, and 66.1% p < 0.001). Death-censored allograft survival rates were higher in FTR group at one, three, and five yr (91.3%, 82.7% and 71.4% vs. 88%, 77.7% and 66.5% p < 0.001). In today's era of modern immunosuppression, graft survival in RTR has improved but remains inferior to FTR when controlling for donor factors.

Risk factors for retransplant kidney recipients: relisting and outcomes from patients' primary transplant.

As of November 2013, 14.5% of the waitlist for a donor kidney comprised patients awaiting a retransplant. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 11,698 adult solitary kidney recipients using national Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data transplanted between 2002 and 2011. The aim was to investigate whether outcomes from patients' initial transplants are significant risk factors for patients' repeat transplants or for likelihood of relisting after a failed primary transplant. Retransplant recipients were more likely to be treated for acute rejection [adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.26 (1.07-1.48), p = 0.0053] or hospitalized (AOR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.08-1.31, p = 0.0005) within a year of retransplantation if these outcomes were experienced within a year of primary transplant. Delayed graft function following primary transplants was associated with 35% increased likelihood of recurrence (AOR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.18-1.54, p < 0.0001). An increase in 1-year GFR after primary transplant was associated with GFR 1 year postretransplant (ß = 6.82, p < 0.0001), and retransplant graft failure was inversely associated with 1-year primary transplant GFR (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.71-0.76 per 10 mL/min/1.73 m(2) ). A decreased likelihood for relisting was associated with hospitalization and higher GFR following primary transplantation. The increasing numbers of individuals requiring retransplants highlights the importance of incorporating prior transplant outcomes data to better inform relisting decisions and prognosticating retransplant outcomes.

Second free jejunum transfer after flap loss does not affect oral intake: A retrospective case-control study.

PURPOSE: Free jejunum transfer is one of the standard procedures for restoring oral intake after total pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy. Flap loss leading to a second free jejunum transfer rarely occurs. This study investigated the impact of a second free jejunum transfer on post-operative oral intake. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent a first free jejunum transfer between July 1998 and December 2019. A total of 367 patients were included in the study. Among them, 17 patients who underwent a second free jejunum transfer because necrosis constituted the second free jejunum transfer group, whereas 350 patients who did not require a second free jejunum transfer formed the first free jejunum transfer group. The incidence of dysphagia requiring tube feeding and post-operative complications was compared between the two groups. Moreover, risk factors for dysphagia and complications were estimated. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of dysphagia post-operation between the two groups. A second free jejunum transfer was a statistically significant factor for complications at 2- and 6-months post-operation; however, there were no significant differences in complication rates at the 12-month follow-up. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the incidence of severe complications between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Although a second free jejunum transfer increases early complications, it is not associated with major complications and does not negatively impact oral intake. These findings support the conclusion that free jejunum transfer is safe and helps maintain post-operative quality of life.

Management of immunosuppressive therapy after functional renal graft failure: results of a practice survey of French-speaking nephrologists / Gestion du traitement immunosuppresseur après arrêt fonctionnel du greffon rénal : résultats d'une enquête de pratique parmi les néphrologues francophones.

The management of patients with kidney transplant failure (KTF) remains a complex process involving multiple stakeholders. A working group of the Transplantation Commission of the French-speaking Society of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation (SFNDT) conducted a survey on the management of immunosuppressants (IS) after KTF among nephrologists at transplant centres and general nephrologists in France, Switzerland and Belgium between March and June 2023. We analysed 232 replies from 58 nephrologists at transplant centres and 174 general nephrologists, aged 43.6 (+10.6) years. In the first three months following KTF, nephrologists reported discontinuing antimetabolite, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and corticosteroid treatment in 83%, 39.9% and 25.8% of cases respectively. Conversely, some nephrologists reported that they were continuing to use CNI (14%) and corticosteroids (19.1%) on a long-term basis. The patient's comorbidities associated with the discontinuation of IS treatment are cancer and opportunistic infections as KT's complications and presence of diabetes mellitus at KTF, whereas humoral rejection encourages the IS to be maintained. Transplantectomy is proposed by nephrologists most often for graft intolerance syndrome (86.5%), more rarely to discontinue IS (17.6%) or in the absence of plans of new transplantation (9.3%). In multivariate analyses, the presence of a protocol in the centre facilitated the management of IS by the general nephrologists. The management of IS after AFG by French-speaking nephrologists is heterogeneous. Specific prospective studies are needed to establish new best practice recommendations, based on more robust evidence, which could encourage better adherence by nephrologists.

La prise en charge des patients avec un arrêt fonctionnel du greffon rénal (AFG) reste un processus complexe avec de multiples intervenants. Un groupe de travail de la Société francophone de néphrologie, dialyse et transplantation (SFNDT) a conduit une enquête sur la gestion des traitements immunosuppresseurs (IS) après AFG parmi les néphrologues de centres de transplantation et néphrologues généraux en France, Suisse et Belgique francophone entre mars et juin 2023. Nous avons pu analyser 232 réponses de néphrologues (centres de transplantation N = 58 et généraux N = 174) âgés de 43,6 (± 10,6) ans. Dans les 3 premiers mois suivant l'AFG, les néphrologues déclarent interrompre le traitement par antimétabolites (83 %), inhibiteurs de la calcineurine (ICN) (39,9 %) et corticoïdes (25,8 %). À l'inverse, certains déclarent maintenir les ICN (14 %) et les corticoïdes (19,1 %) au long cours en cas de projet de nouvelle transplantation rénale (TR). La survenue de cancer pendant la TR, d'infections opportunistes dans la dernière année de TR ou à l'initiation de la dialyse, et la présence d'un diabète lors de l'AFG sont associées avec l'arrêt du traitement IS alors que la perte du greffon par rejet humoral incite à le maintenir. En analyse multivariée, la présence d'un protocole dans le centre facilite la gestion des IS par les néphrologues généraux. Enfin, la transplantectomie est proposée par les néphrologues le plus souvent pour un syndrome d'intolérance du greffon (86,5 %), plus rarement pour interrompre les IS (17,6 %) ou en l'absence de projet de nouvelle TR (9,3 %). La gestion des IS après l'AFG par les néphrologues francophones est hétérogène. Des études prospectives spécifiques sont nécessaires afin de formuler de nouvelles recommandations de bonnes pratiques, reposant sur des données probantes plus robustes, qui pourraient encourager une meilleure adhésion par les néphrologues.

End-stage care for children after heart transplant.

Heart transplant is performed annually in over 600 children worldwide to treat life-limiting cardiac disease. Conversations regarding waitlist mortality, post-transplant morbidity and mortality, and goals of care are commonplace pre-transplant. However, there is a void of information and resources for providers and families when end-stage disease recurs in the long-term transplant recipient. The purpose of this review is to discuss the care of the pediatric heart transplant recipient with chronic cardiac dysfunction occurring years after a successful transplant. This includes a need for transplant providers to have education and training related both to palliative care and medical ethics to improve shared decision making with patients and families.

Patient survival following third time liver transplant in the United States in the MELD era.

BACKGROUND: Third time liver transplantation is a technically demanding exercise with variable outcomes in single center series. There has been no national level description of survival following third time liver transplant in the US in the MELD era. METHODS: Third time liver transplants between March 1, 2002 and January 1, 2018 in the UNOS dataset were analyzed. RESULTS: Patient survival among the 240 third time liver transplant recipients in the study at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years (71.8%, 62.4%, 59.1%, 49.5%) was significantly worse compared to primary liver transplant (90.6%, 83.9%, 78.8%, 67.6%; p < 0.001) and retransplant (77.1%, 70.3%, 65.6%, 54.9%; p = 0.014). Recipients who were under 43 years old, not on dialysis, without diabetes, and over 1 month out from their second transplant had acceptable survival at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years (88.5%, 78.4%, 73.6%, 69.7%). CONCLUSIONS: While redo-redo transplant remains a challenging endeavor, appropriate patient selection can yield acceptable results.

Study of re-transplantation and prognosis in liver transplant center in Iran.

AIM: This this study aimed to investigate the causes and prognoses of liver re-transplantation in patients referred to Imam Khomeini Hospital Liver Transplantation Center. BACKGROUND: Organ shortage is a major problem in the world, a high demand for liver transplantation has exacerbated this problem. Thus, providing more information on the causes of liver re-transplantation, its prognosis, and other issues related to this procedure is of great importance. METHODS: This study was conducted in 2018 as a historical cohort. In this study, the records of liver transplantation patients at Imam Khomeini Hospital Liver Transplantation Center between 2000 and 2016 were studied, and data was extracted from the records of patients undergoing liver transplantation. Patient data was entered into SPSS 20 software and analyzed. RESULTS: In this study, 1030 patients with a mean age of 43.15 ± 14.57 years were studied. There were 426 women (41.4%) and 604 men (58.6%). The number of primary transplants was 966 with a mean age of 43.19 ± 14.72, and the number of re-transplants was 64 with a mean age of 42.56 ± 12.82. Significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of MELD and CHILD scores, cold ischemic time, total and direct bilirubin levels, liver function factors (ALT, AST, and alkaline phosphatase), hemoglobin, and WBC. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, sex, or platelets (> 0.05). The mortality rate was 241 (23.39%) in all patients and the mortality rate was 206 (21.32%) and in liver transplant patients was 35 (54.68%). The mortality rate in the transplant group was statistically higher (p<0.001). Secondary was primary non-functional graft (PNF) (37.5%) with 1-, 3, and 5-year survival rates of 82%, 81%, and 70% in primary group and 59%, 43% and 32% in re-transplantation, respectively. There was a significant difference in survival between the two groups (p <0.05). Hemoglobin and alkaline phosphatase were predictors of survival rates in transplant patients. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that the survival rate of re-transplant patients was significantly lower than that of primary transplant patients, and the mortality rate in re-transplant patients was significantly higher.