Association of early steroid withdrawal with kidney transplant outcomes in first-transplant and retransplant recipients.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Early steroid withdrawal (ESW) is often preferred over conventional steroid maintenance (CSM) therapy for kidney transplant recipients with low immunological risks because it may minimize immunosuppression-related adverse events while achieving similar transplant outcomes. However, the risk-benefit balance of ESW could be less favorable in retransplant recipients given their unique immunological risk profile. We hypothesized that the association of ESW with transplant outcomes would differ between first-transplant and retransplant recipients. METHODS: To assess whether the impact of ESW differs between first and retransplant recipients, we studied 210 086 adult deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Recipients who discontinued maintenance steroids before discharge from transplant admission were classified with ESW; all others were classified with CSM. We quantified the association of ESW (vs. CSM) with acute rejection, death-censored graft failure, and death, addressing retransplant as an effect modifier, using logistic/Cox regression with inverse probability weights to control for confounders. RESULTS: In our cohort, 26 248 (12%) were retransplant recipients. ESW was used in 30% of first-transplant and 20% of retransplant recipients. Among first-transplant recipients, ESW was associated with no significant difference in acute rejection (aOR = 1.04 [95% CI = 1.00-1.09]), slightly higher hazard of graft failure (HR = 1.09 [95% CI = 1.05-1.12]), and slightly lower mortality (HR = 0.93 [95% CI = 0.91-0.95]) compared to CSM. Nonetheless, among retransplant recipients, ESW was associated with notably higher risk of acute rejection (OR = 1.42 [95% CI = 1.29-1.57]; interaction p < 0.001) and graft failure (HR = 1.24 [95% CI = 1.14-1.34]; interaction p = 0.003), and similar mortality (HR = 1.01 [95% CI = 0.94-1.08]; interaction p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In retransplant recipients, the negative impacts of ESW on transplant outcomes appear to be non-negligible. A more conservatively tailored approach to ESW might be necessary for retransplant recipients.

Long-term control of diabetes by tofacitinib-based immunosuppressive regimen after allo islet transplantation in diabetic rhesus monkeys that rejected previously transplanted porcine islets.

Porcine islet xenotransplantation has been highlighted as an alternative to allo islet transplantation. Despite the remarkable progress that has been made in porcine-islet pre-clinical studies in nonhuman primates, immunological tolerance to porcine islets has not been achieved to date. Therefore, allo islet transplantation could be required after the failure of porcine islet xenotransplantation. Here, we report the long-term control of diabetes by allogeneic pancreatic islet transplantation in diabetic rhesus monkeys that rejected previously transplanted porcine islets. Four diabetic male rhesus monkeys received the porcine islets and then allo islets (5700-19 000 IEQ/kg) were re-transplanted for a short or long period after the first xeno islet rejection. The recipient monkeys were treated with an immunosuppressive regimen consisting of ATG, humira, and anakinra for induction, and sirolimus and tofacitinib for maintenance therapy. The graft survival days of allo islets in these monkeys were >440, 395, >273, and 127, respectively, similar to that in allo islet transplanted cynomolgus monkeys that received the same immunosuppressive regimen without xeno sensitization. Taken together, it is likely that prior islet xenotransplantation does not affect the survival of subsequent allo islets under clinically applicable immunosuppressants.

Beyond Immunity: Challenges in Kidney Retransplantation Among Persons Living With HIV.

INTRODUCTION: While superb outcomes have been observed in the HIV-positive (HIV+) population, graft failure and subsequent need for kidney retransplantation (re-KT) remain a concern. This study aims to investigate the difference in success rates of re-KT allograft survival in the HIV+ versus HIV-negative (HIV-) population in the current era of transplantation (2014-2022). METHODS: Data was collected from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network on all kidney transplant donors and recipients who had their first re-KT between 2014 and 2022. Allograft survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis with a log-rank test, while risk factors for graft loss were assessed using Cox proportional hazards with statistical significance set to P = 0.05. RESULTS: HIV+ recipients were significantly more likely to be Black (P < 0.001), have an HLA mismatch >3 (P = 0.018), delayed graft function (P = 0.023), and graft loss from primary nonfunction (P < 0.001). Their HIV- counterparts were more likely to be White (P < 0.001) and Hispanic (<0.001), lose their graft from acute rejection (P = 0.044), and have a living donor (P = 0.001). Being HIV+ was associated with a 1.68-fold increased risk of graft loss, an HLA mismatch >3 held a 1.18-fold increase, experiencing delayed graft function held a 1.89-fold increase, and having diabetes was associated with a 1.16-fold increased risk. Living donor kidneys were associated with a 15.8% decrease in risk for graft failure. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significantly lower duration of kidney allograft survival in the HIV+ community (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Disproportional graft failure and inadequate HLA mismatching persist within the HIV+ Re-KT community. Stronger organ matching and new approaches for desensitizing retransplant candidates are vital.

A change of heart: Characteristics and outcomes of multiple cardiac retransplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Among heart transplant (HT) recipients who develop advanced graft dysfunction, cardiac re-transplantation may be considered. A smaller subset of patients will experience failure of their second allograft and undergo repeat re-transplantation. Outcomes among these individuals are not well-described. METHODS: Adult and pediatric patients in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry who received HT between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2020 were included. RESULTS: Between 1990 and 2020, 90 individuals received a third HT and three underwent a fourth HT. Recipients were younger than those undergoing primary HT (mean age 32 years). Third HT was associated with significantly higher unadjusted rates of 1-year mortality (18% for third HT vs. 13% for second HT vs. 9% for primary HT, p < .001) and 10-year mortality (59% for third HT vs. 42% for second HT vs. 37% for primary HT, p < .001). Mortality was highest amongst recipients aged >60 years and those re-transplanted for acute graft failure. Long-term rates of CAV, rejection, chronic dialysis, and hospitalization for infection were also higher. CONCLUSIONS: Third HT is associated with higher morbidity and mortality than primary HT. Further consensus is needed regarding appropriate organ stewardship for this unique subgroup.

Pre-transplant multidrug-resistant infections in liver transplant recipients-epidemiology and impact on transplantation outcome.

BACKGROUND: Cirrhotic patients are highly exposed to healthcare services and antibiotics. Although pre-liver transplantation (LT) infections are directly related to the worsening of liver function, the impact of these infections on LT outcomes is still unclear. This study aimed to identify the effect of multidrug-resistant microorganism (MDRO) infections before LT on survival after LT. METHODS: Retrospective study that included patients who underwent LT between 2010 and 2019. Variables analyzed were related to patients' comorbidities, underlying diseases, time on the waiting list, antibiotic use, LT surgery, and occurrences post-LT. Multivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression, and Cox regression for survival analysis. RESULTS: A total of 865 patients were included; 351 infections were identified in 259 (30%) patients, of whom 75 (29%) had ≥1 pre-LT MDRO infection. The most common infection was spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (34%). The agent was identified in 249(71%), 53(15%) were polymicrobial. The most common microorganism was Klebsiella pneumoniae (18%); the most common MDRO was ESBL-producing Enterobacterales (16%), and carbapenem-resistant (CR) Enterobacterales (10%). Factors associated with MDRO infections before LT were previous use of therapeutic cephalosporin (p = .001) and fluoroquinolone (p = .001), SBP prophylaxis (p = .03), ACLF before LT (p = .03), and days of hospital stay pre-LT (p < .001); HCC diagnosis was protective (p = .01). Factors associated with 90-day mortality after LT were higher MELD on inclusion to the waiting list (p = .02), pre-LT MDRO infection (p = .04), dialysis after LT (p < .001), prolonged duration of LT surgery (p < .001), post-LT CR-Gram-negative bacteria infection (p < .001), and early retransplantation (p = .004). CONCLUSION: MDRO infections before LT have an important impact on survival after LT.

Gastric sleeve as an extra-anatomical roux for biliary reconstruction in a pediatric third liver transplant.

BACKGROUND: Sir Roy Calne in 1976 described "Biliary reconstruction is the Achilles heel of liver transplantation," and it remains true. In some patients, such as those with short-gut syndrome and concomitant biliary atresia, neither duct to duct nor Roux biliary reconstruction is feasible. METHODS: We present a case of child's third liver transplant (LT), where an innovative extra-anatomical biliary bypass was created using a sleeve from greater curvature of the stomach. RESULTS: The patient is well nearly 10 years following the LT. CONCLUSIONS: This technique could prove to be an important addition to the armamentarium of a surgeon in difficult retransplants and in patients with short-gut syndrome as it provides a viable option with good long-term outcome.

Lung Re-transplantation after prolonged veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in a child with chronic lung allograft dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) may be used as a bridge to lung transplantation in selected patients with end-stage respiratory failure. Historically, ECMO use in this setting has been associated with poor outcomes Puri V et.al, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 140:427. More recently, technical advances and the implementation of rehabilitation and ambulation while awaiting transplantation on ECMO have led to improved surgical and post-transplant outcomes Kirkby S et.al, J Thorac Dis, 6:1024. METHODS: We illustrate the case of a 6-year-old child who received prolonged ECMO support as a bridge to lung re-transplantation secondary to Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction (CLAD). RESULTS: Early rehabilitation was key in improving the overall pre-transplant conditioning during ECMO. CONCLUSIONS: Despite challenges associated with awake/ambulatory ECMO, the use of this strategy as a bridge to lung transplantation is feasible and has resulted in improved pre-transplant conditioning and post-transplant outcomes.

Early Graft Failure After Living-Donor Liver Transplant.

BACKGROUND: Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been increasing in the USA. While data exist on longer-term patient and graft outcomes, a contemporary analysis of short-term outcomes is needed. AIM: Evaluate short-term (30-day) graft failure rates and identify predictors associated with these outcomes. METHODS: Adult (≥ 18) LDLT recipients from 01/2004 to 12/2021 were analyzed from the United States Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Graft status at 30 days was assessed with graft failure defined as retransplantation or death. Comparison of continuous and categorical variables was performed and a multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors of early graft failure. RESULTS: During the study period, 4544 LDLTs were performed with a graft failure rate of 3.4% (155) at 30 days. Grafts from male donors (aOR: 0.63, CI 0.44-0.89), right lobe grafts (aOR: 0.40, CI 0.27-0.61), recipients aged > 60 years (aOR: 0.52, CI 0.32-0.86), and higher recipient albumin (aOR: 0.73, CI 0.57-0.93) were associated with superior early graft outcomes, whereas Asian recipient race (vs. White; aOR: 3.75, CI 1.98-7.10) and a history of recipient PVT (aOR: 2.7, CI 1.52-4.78) were associated with inferior outcomes. LDLTs performed during the most recent 2016-2021 period (compared to 2004-2009 and 2010-2015) resulted in significantly superior outcomes (aOR: 0.45, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that while short-term adult LDLT graft failure is uncommon, there are opportunities for optimizing outcomes by prioritizing right lobe donation, improving candidate nutritional status, and careful pre-transplant risk assessment of candidates with known PVT. Notably, a period effect exists whereby increased LDLT experience in the most recent era correlated with improved outcomes.

Challenges in the management of the kidney allograft: from decline to failure: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference.

In March 2022, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) held a virtual Controversies Conference to address the important but rarely examined phase during which the kidney transplant is failing or has failed. In addition to discussing the definition of a failing allograft, 4 broad areas were considered in the context of a declining functioning graft: prognosis and kidney failure trajectory; immunosuppression strategies; management of medical and psychological complications, and patient factors; and choice of kidney replacement therapy or supportive care following graft loss. Identifying and paying special attention to individuals with failing allografts was felt to be important in order to prepare patients psychologically, manage immunosuppression, address complications, prepare for dialysis and/or retransplantation, and transition to supportive care. Accurate prognostication tools, although not yet widely available, were embraced as necessary to define allograft survival trajectories and the likelihood of allograft failure. The decision of whether to withdraw or continue immunosuppression after allograft failure was deemed to be based most appropriately on risk-benefit analysis and likelihood of retransplantation within a few months. Psychological preparation and support was identified as a critical factor in patient adjustment to graft failure, as was early communication. Several models of care were noted that enabled a medically supportive transition back to dialysis or retransplantation. Emphasis was placed on the importance of dialysis-access readiness before initiation of dialysis, in order to avoid use of central venous catheters. The centrality of the patient to all management decisions and discussions was deemed to be paramount. Patient "activation," which can be defined as engaged agency, was seen as the most effective way to achieve success. Unresolved controversies, gaps in knowledge, and areas for research were also stressed in the conference deliberations.

Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome at 3 Years After Transplantation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The long-term efficacy and possible adverse events of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are unknown. This study performed a 3-year follow-up of the patients in our previous clinical trial to clarify these aspects. METHODS: This study included 125 patients (104 females, and 21 males): 38 in a placebo group, 42 who received 30 g of donor feces, and 45 who received 60 g of donor feces. Feces was administered to the duodenum. The patients provided a fecal sample and completed 5 questionnaires at baseline and at 2 and 3 years after FMT. Fecal bacteria and dysbiosis index were analyzed using 16S ribosomal RNA gene polymerase chain reaction DNA amplification/probe hybridization covering the V3 to V9 regions. RESULTS: Response rates were 26.3%, 69.1%, and 77.8% in the placebo, 30-g, and 60-g groups, respectively, at 2 years after FMT, and 27.0%, 64.9%, and 71.8%, respectively, at 3 years after FMT. The response rates were significantly higher in the 30-g and 60-g groups than in the placebo group. Patients in the 30-g and 60-g groups had significantly fewer IBS symptoms and fatigue, and a greater quality of life both at 2 and 3 years after FMT. The dysbiosis index decreased only in the active treatment groups at 2 and 3 years after FMT. Fluorescent signals of 10 bacteria had significant correlations with IBS symptoms and fatigue after FMT in the 30-g and 60-g groups. No long-term adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: FMT performed according to our protocol resulted in high response rates and long-standing effects with only few mild self-limited adverse events. This study was registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT03822299).

Benefit of Kidney Transplantation for Post Lung Transplantation Renal Failure.

INTRODUCTION: Nephrotoxicity is a significant side effect of thoracic transplantation. Many lung transplant patients will require subsequent renal transplantation (KAL). Recently, simultaneous lung/kidney transplants (SLuK) have become an attractive option for patients with end-stage renal disease at the time of lung transplantation. This article explores SLuK outcomes compared to conventional KAL, as well as outcomes among KAL patients against those were KAL listed but never transplanted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing/the Organ Procurement and Transportation Network database was used to identify SLuK patients (n = 74), KAL transplants (n = 456), and patients who were listed for KAL but were never transplanted (n = 626). Significance was determined by chi2, Wilcoxon rank sum test, or independent t-tests. Death-censored graft survival for subgroups was estimated using Kaplan-Meier with log-rank for significance. Analyses were completed using SPSS Statistics 28. RESULTS: The SLuK cohort was older (P = 0.04), more likely diabetic (P < 0.001), and had shorter life expectancies (P < 0.001) than KAL patients. Of those SLuK transplants within 5 y, 84% of patients were alive 1 y post transplant and 82% were alive 3 y post-transplant (compared to 74.6% and 60.3% of overall SLuK). Patients who did undergo KAL were younger and had a lower body mass index (both P < 0.001) compared to those who did not. Those who received a kidney had increased survival times compared to WL patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Conventional KAL transplants are still favorable for average lung recipients. However, recent improvements have made SLuK an option for patients with renal dysfunction. Those patients who were able to receive KAL transplants were better surgical candidates than those who remained on the waitlist.

Effects of the implementation of acuity circle policy on waitlist and post-transplant outcomes of liver re-transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Acuity circle (AC) policy implementation improved the waitlist outcomes for certain liver transplant (LT)-candidates. The impact of the policy implementation for liver retransplant (reLT) candidates is unknown. METHODS: Using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) data from January, 2018 to September, 2021, we investigated the effect of the AC policy on waitlist and post-LT outcomes among patients who had previously received a LT. Patients were categorized by relisting date: Pre-AC (Era 1: January 1, 2018-February 3, 2020; n = 750); and Post-AC (Era 2: February 4, 2020-June 30, 2021; n = 556). Patient and donor characteristics, as well as on-waitlist and post-reLT outcomes were compared across eras. RESULTS: In Era 2, the probability of transplant within 90 days overall and among patients relisted > 14 days from initial transplant (late relisting) were significantly higher compared to Era 1 (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 1.40, 95% CI 1.18-1.64, p < .001; sHR 1.52, 95% CI 1.23-1.88, p = .001, respectively). However, there was no difference by era among patients relisted ≤14 days from initial transplant (early relisting; sHR 1.21, 95% CI .93-1.57, p = .15). Likewise, among early relisting patients, risks for 180-day graft loss and mortality were significantly higher in Era 2 versus Era 1 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 5.77, 95% CI 1.71-19.51, p = .004; and aHR 8.22, 95% CI 1.85-36.59, p = .005, respectively); for late relisting patients, risks for these outcomes were similar across eras. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the implementation of AC policy has improved transplant rates and reduced waiting time for reLT candidates listed > 14 days from initial transplant. However, the impact upon early relisting patients may be mixed.

Repeat pediatric heart transplantation: A united network for organ sharing database analysis.

BACKGROUND: A history of congenital heart disease and previous transplantation are each independently associated with worse survival following pediatric heart transplantation. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of children undergoing repeat heart transplantation in the United States based on the underlying diagnosis. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was used to identify 8111 patients aged <18 years undergoing isolated heart transplantation from 2000 to 2021, including 435 (5.4%) repeat transplants. Restricted cubic spline analysis assessed the non-linear relationship between inter-transplant interval and the primary outcome of all-cause mortality or re-transplantation. Multivariable Cox regression assessed the impact of re-transplantation on the primary outcome. Median follow-up was 5.0 (interquartile range 1.9-9.9) years. RESULTS: Repeat transplant patients were older (median age 12 vs. 4 years; p < .001), and less likely to be in UNOS status 1A (66.0%, n = 287 vs. 81.0% n = 6217; p < .001) than primary transplant patients. Freedom from the primary outcome was 51.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 45.5-57.2) among repeat transplants and 70.5% (95% CI 69.2-71.8) among primary transplants at 10 years (p < .001). Among repeat transplant patients, the relative hazard of the primary outcome became non-significant when the inter-transplant interval >3.6 years. Congenital heart disease was an independent predictor of mortality among primary (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.6-1.9) but not repeat transplant (HR 1.1, 95% CI .8-1.6) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcomes remain poor for patients undergoing repeat heart transplantation, particularly those with an inter-transplant interval <3.6 years. Underlying diagnosis does not impact outcomes after repeat transplantation, after accounting for other risk factors.

Has the risk of liver re-transplantation improved over the two decades?

BACKGROUND: Despite advancements in liver transplantation (LT) over the past two decades, liver re-transplantation (re-LT) presents challenges. This study aimed to assess improvements in re-LT outcomes and contributing factors. METHODS: Data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database (2002-2021) were analyzed, with recipients categorized into four-year intervals. Trends in re-LT characteristics and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 128,462 LT patients, 7254 received re-LT. Graft survival (GS) for re-LT improved (91.3%, 82.1%, and 70.8% at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years post-LT from 2018 to 2021). However, hazard ratios (HRs) for GS remained elevated compared to marginal donors including donors after circulatory death (DCD), although the difference in HRs decreased in long-term GS. Changes in re-LT causes included a reduction in hepatitis C recurrence and an increase in graft failure post-primary LT involving DCD. Trends identified included recent decreased cold ischemic time (CIT) and increased distance from donor hospital in re-LT group. Meanwhile, DCD cohort exhibited less significant increase in distance and more marked decrease in CIT. The shortest CIT was recorded in urgent re-LT group. The highest Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was observed in urgent re-LT group, while the lowest was recorded in DCD group. Analysis revealed shorter time interval between previous LT and re-listing, leading to worse outcomes, and varying primary graft failure causes influencing overall survival post-re-LT. DISCUSSION: While short-term re-LT outcomes improved, challenges persist compared to DCD. Further enhancements are required, with ongoing research focusing on optimizing risk stratification models and allocation systems for better LT outcomes.

Liver Transplantation for Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC) With or Without Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)-A European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) Consensus Statement.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is the classical hepatobiliary manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and a lead indication for liver transplantation (LT) in the western world. In this article, we present a Consensus Statement on LT practice, developed by a dedicated Guidelines' Taskforce of the European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT). The overarching goal is to provide practical guidance on commonly debated topics, including indications and timing of LT, management of bile duct stenosis in patients on the transplant waiting list, technical aspects of transplantation, immunosuppressive strategies post-transplant, timing and extension of intestinal resection and futility criteria for re-transplantation.

The Perspectives of General Nephrologists Toward Transitions of Care and Management of Failing Kidney Transplants.

The management of failing kidney allograft and transition of care to general nephrologists (GN) remain a complex process. The Kidney Pancreas Community of Practice (KPCOP) Failing Allograft Workgroup designed and distributed a survey to GN between May and September 2021. Participants were invited via mail and email invitations. There were 103 respondents with primarily adult nephrology practices, of whom 41% had an academic affiliation. More than 60% reported listing for a second kidney as the most important concern in caring for patients with a failing allograft, followed by immunosuppression management (46%) and risk of mortality (38%), while resistant anemia was considered less of a concern. For the initial approach to immunosuppression reduction, 60% stop antimetabolites first, and 26% defer to the transplant nephrologist. Communicating with transplant centers about immunosuppression cessation was reported to occur always by 60%, and sometimes by 29%, while 12% reported making the decision independently. Nephrologists with academic appointments communicate with transplant providers more than private nephrologists (74% vs. 49%, p = 0.015). There are heterogeneous approaches to the care of patients with a failing allograft. Efforts to strengthen transitions of care and to develop practical practice guidelines are needed to improve the outcomes of this vulnerable population.

Chronic Pancreas Allograft Rejection Followed by Successful HLA-Incompatible Islet Alloautotransplantation: A Novel Strategy?

The purpose of pancreas or islet transplantation is to restore glycemic control in order to mitigate diabetes-related complications and prevent severe hypoglycemia. Complications from chronic pancreas allograft rejection may lead to transplantectomy, even when the endocrine function remains preserved. We present first evidence of a successful HLA incompatible islet re-transplantation with islets isolated from a rejecting pancreas allograft after simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation. The pancreas allograft was removed because of progressively painful pancreatic panniculitis from clinically uncontrolled chronic rejection. The endocrine function was preserved. Induction treatment for this "islet alloautotransplantation" consisted of plasmapheresis, IVIg and alemtuzumab. At 1 year, the patient retained islet graft function with good glycemic control and absence of severe hypoglycemia, despite persistent low-grade HLA donor-specific antibodies. His panniculitis had resolved completely. In our point of view, islet alloautotransplantation derived from a chronically rejecting pancreas allograft is a potential option to salvage (partial) islet function, despite preformed donor-specific antibodies, in order to maintain stable glycemic control. Thereby it protects against severe hypoglycemia, and it potentially mitigates kidney graft dysfunction and other diabetes-related complications in patients with continued need for immunosuppression and who are otherwise difficult to retransplant.

Operational tolerance after intestine re-transplantation in childhood and immunological correlates. Case report and review.

BACKGROUND: Operational tolerance after retransplantation of the intestine has never been reported. PURPOSE: To two recently described intestine transplant recipients with operational tolerance, we now add a third. METHODS: Review of case record and immunological testing to confirm donor-specific hyporesponsiveness in multiple immune cell compartments. RESULTS: Re-transplanted with a multivisceral liver- and kidney-inclusive intestine allograft at age 12 years, this recipient self-discontinued immunosuppression 14 years after the retransplant and has been rejection free for 2 years thereafter. As in the two previous reports, immunological testing demonstrated decreased donor-specific inflammatory response of T-cytotoxic memory cells and B-cells, decreased presentation of donor antigen by B-cells and monocytes, absence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies, circulating FOXP3 + T-helper cells, and intact cellular and humoral immunity to cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus. Additionally, our recipient demonstrated enhanced donor-activation-induced apoptosis of alloreactive T-cytotoxic memory cells. CONCLUSIONS: Despite variable paths to tolerance which include graft versus host disease in two previous cases, and rejection-related loss of the primary isolated intestinal allograft in our recipient, the three cases with operational tolerance are bound by common themes: a relatively large donor antigenic load transmitted during intestine transplantation, and donor-specific hyporesponsiveness. Cell-based assays suggest enhanced donor-induced apoptosis of recipient T-cells and circulating T-regulatory cells as mechanistic links between antigenic load and donor-specific hyporesponsiveness.

Perioperative Outcomes During Double-Lung Transplantation and Retransplantation in Cystic Fibrosis Patients: A Monocentric Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Life expectancy for lung-transplant patients, especially those with cystic fibrosis (CF), is leading increasingly to more retransplantations. DESIGN: Retrospective monocentric cohort study. SETTING: Foch University Hospital, Suresnes, France. PARTICIPANTS: CF patients having had a primary double-lung transplantation (pLgTx) or a retransplantation (reLgTx) from 2012 to 2021. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The authors compared the main intraoperative and early postoperative features between pLgTx (n = 258) and reLgTx (n = 24). Demographic characteristics were similar. No patients with retransplantations had a preoperative bridge with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); however, 23 patients had it in the pLgTx group (p = 0.24). Patients with retransplants had longer second graft ischemic time (p = 0.02), larger intraoperative bleeding volume (p = 0.001) and blood transfusion (p = 0.009 for packed red blood cells), increased blood lactate concentrations (p = 0.002), and higher norepinephrine dose at end-surgery (p = 0.001). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was used during surgery in 94 patients in the pLgTx group and 12 patients in the reLgTx group (p = 0.39). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation could not be weaned after surgery in 55 patients in the pLgTx group and 4 in the reLgTx group (p = 0.54). Despite worse preoperative renal function in the reLgTx group (p < 0.001), there was no difference concerning renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit between groups (p = 0.08). There were no differences between groups concerning the main complications, including primary graft dysfunction. Although the difference was not statistically different (p = 0.17), mortality was 3 times higher in the reLgTx group. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative period of retransplantation was more convoluted but had a similar ECMO profile to primary transplantation. In addition, the early postoperative period was similar.

[Surgical outcomes and complications following third kidney transplantation]. / Résultats et complications chirurgicales des troisièmes transplantations rénales.

BACKGROUND: After two consecutive kidney transplant failures, a third kidney transplantation improves survival for patients on the waiting list. The surgical outcomes and complications of third kidney transplantations remain poorly known. METHODS: We analyzed the last 100 third kidney transplantations performed in our center between January 2000 and August 2018. The data, relating to donors and recipients, were extracted retrospectively from medical records and from the prospective DIVAT database (computerized and validated data in transplantation). Continuous variables are expressed as means, medians, first and third quartiles (median, [Q1;Q3]). Categorical variables are expressed as percentages. Patient and transplant survivals were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Mean age of recipients was 46.4 years (47, [36;53]). Thirty-five percent had kidney failure due to urinary tract malformations. Mean age of donors was 48.2 years (52, [39.75; 58]) with 63% of donors with standard criteria. Mean cold ischemia time was 22.4hours (21, [16.5; 29.2]). Surgical mortality rate was 2% and surgical complication rate was 45%. Third kidney transplants survival was 73.1% and 58.8% at 5 years and 10 years. Mortality rate with a functioning transplant was 18%. CONCLUSION: A third kidney transplant offers satisfactory functional outcomes but remains associated with high morbi-mortality and a significant death rate with a functioning transplant.