Soft-tissue sarcoma in adults: An update on the current state of histiotype-specific management in an era of personalized medicine.

Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumors that account for 1% of all adult malignancies, with over 100 different histologic subtypes occurring predominately in the trunk, extremity, and retroperitoneum. This low incidence is further complicated by their variable presentation, behavior, and long-term outcomes, which emphasize the importance of centralized care in specialized centers with a multidisciplinary team approach. In the last decade, there has been an effort to improve the quality of care for patients with STS based on anatomic site and histology, and multiple ongoing clinical trials are focusing on tailoring therapy to histologic subtype. This report summarizes the latest evidence guiding the histiotype-specific management of extremity/truncal and retroperitoneal STS with regard to surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy.

Impact of three-dimensional-printing technology guidance on surgical outcomes for retroperitoneal sarcoma: A propensity score-matched study.

BACKGROUND: The surgical treatment of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is highly challenging because of its complex anatomy. In this study, the authors compared the surgical outcomes of patients with RPS who underwent surgical resection guided by three-dimensional (3D) printing technology versus traditional imaging. METHODS: This retrospective study included 251 patients who underwent RPS resection guided by 3D-printing technology or traditional imaging from January 2019 to December 2022. The main outcome measures were operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and hospital stay. RESULTS: In total, 251 patients were enrolled in the study: 46 received 3D-printed navigation, and 205 underwent traditional surgical methods. Propensity score matching yielded 44 patients in the 3D group and 82 patients in the control group. The patients' demographics and tumor characteristics were comparable in the matched cohorts. The 3D group had significantly shorter operative time (median, 186.5 minutes [interquartile range (IQR), 130.0-251.3 minutes] vs. 210.0 minutes [IQR, 150.8-277.3 minutes]; p = .04), less intraoperative blood loss (median, 300.0 mL [IQR, 100.0-575.0 mL] vs. 375.0 mL [IQR, 200.0-925.0 mL]; p = .02), shorter postoperative hospital stays (median, 11.0 days [IQR, 9.0-13.0 days] vs. 14.0 days [IQR, 10.8-18.3 days]; p = .02), and lower incidence rate of overall postoperative complications than the control group (18.1% vs. 36.6%; p = .03). There were no differences with regard to the intraoperative blood transfusion rate, the R0/R1 resection rate, 30-day mortality, or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the 3D group had favorable surgical outcomes compared with those in the control group. These results suggest that 3D-printing technology might overcome challenges in RPS surgical treatment. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The surgical treatment of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is highly challenging because of its complex anatomy. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether three-dimensional (3D) printing technology offers advantages over traditional two-dimensional imaging (such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) for guiding the surgical treatment of RPS. In a group of patients who had RPS, surgery guided by 3D-printing technology was associated with better surgical outcomes, including shorter operative time, decreased blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and fewer postoperative complications. These findings suggested that 3D-printing technology could help surgeons overcome challenges in the surgical treatment of RPS. 3D-printing technology has important prospects in the surgical treatment of RPS.

Retroperitoneal sarcoma: a 10-year follow-up analysis using hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: We sought clinical characteristics, survival outcomes, and prognostic factors for overall survival of retroperitoneal sarcoma in Japan. METHODS: A Japanese hospital-based cancer registry database with a pivotal 10-year follow-up was used to identify and enroll patients, registered from 106 institutions, diagnosed with retroperitoneal sarcoma in 2008-2009. Treating hospitals were divided by hospital care volume; high-volume hospitals and low-volume hospitals were defined as ≥ 4 and < 4 cases/year, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 91 men and 97 women were included, with a median age of 64 years. The most common histological type was liposarcoma in 101 patients, followed by leiomyosarcoma in 38 patients. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 44.1 and 28.3%. The majority of patients (n = 152, 80.9%) were treated at low-volume hospitals. High-volume hospital patients had higher 10-year overall survival rates than low-volume hospital patients (51.2% vs 23.2%, P = 0.026). Multivariate analysis revealed age over 60 years, treatment in low-volume hospitals and chemotherapy were independent predictors of unfavorable survival while treatment with surgery was an independent predictor of favorable survival. CONCLUSIONS: The possibility of surgical removal was suggested to be the most important prognostic factor for retroperitoneal sarcoma. Better survival was shown in patients treated at high-volume hospitals in our series.

Financial burden of surgical treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma.

PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to compare the financial burden of surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) and gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: All patients who underwent surgery for GC or RPS between 2020 and 2021 at Nagoya University Hospital were included. The clinical characteristics, surgical fees per surgeon, and surgical fees per hour were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The GC and RPS groups included 35 and 63 patients, respectively. In the latter group, 37 patients (59%) underwent tumor resection combined with organ resection; the most common organ was the intestine (n = 23, 37%), followed by the kidney (n = 16, 25%). The mean operative time (248 vs. 417 min, p < 0.001) and intraoperative blood loss (423 vs. 1123 ml, p < 0.001) were significantly greater in the RPS group than in the GC group. The mean surgical fee per surgeon was USD 1667 in the GC group and USD 1022 in the RPS group (p < 0.001) and USD 1388 and USD 777 per hour, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The financial burden of surgical treatment for RPS is unexpectedly higher than that for GC.

Risk Factors for the Development of Early Recurrence in Patients with Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Disease recurrence after retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) surgery is common, and resection may offer no benefit for patients who experience recurrence early. This study examined the incidence of early recurrence (EREC) in RPS patients, and the association between EREC and prognosis, aiming to identify the factors associated with EREC. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery for primary RPS from 2008 to 2019 at two tertiary RPS centers were analyzed. The study defined EREC as any evidence of local recurrence and/or distant metastases on the CT scan up to 6 months after surgery. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of EREC. RESULTS: Of the 692 patients who underwent surgery during the study period, 657 were included in the analysis. Sixty-five of these patients (9.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.7-12.4%) developed EREC. Five-year OS was 3% for the patients with EREC versus 76% for those without EREC (p < 0.001). Patient characteristics were compared between the EREC and non-EREC patients, and EREC was found to be significantly associated with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (p = 0.006), tumor histology (p = 0.002), tumor grading (p < 0.001), radiotherapy (p = 0.04), and postoperative complications measured as a comprehensive complications index value (p = 0.003). However, the only significant independent predictor of EREC in the multivariable analysis was grade 3 tumors, with an odds ratio of 14.8 (95% CI, 4.44-49.2; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Early recurrence is associated with a poor prognosis, and a high tumor grade is an independent predictor for the development of EREC. Patients with EREC may benefit the most from new therapeutic options such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Adjuvant Palbociclib May be Associated with Delayed Recurrence in Completely Resected Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma: Results of a Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal liposarcomas are locally aggressive and frequently recur following complete surgical resection. Palbociclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/CDK6 inhibitor, is effective in the treatment of metastatic or unresectable liposarcoma. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe our initial experience using adjuvant palbociclib to delay recurrence. METHODS: Patients with resected RPS were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database. In 2017, we began offering adjuvant palbociclib to patients following complete gross resection. Treatment interval, defined as the time between surgical resection and re-resection or change in systemic therapy, was compared between patients selected for adjuvant palbociclib or observation. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2020, 12 patients underwent a total of 14 operations (14 patient cases) and were selected for adjuvant palbociclib for recurrence prevention. These patients were compared with 14 patients who, since 2010, underwent a total of 20 operations (20 patient cases) and were selected for observation. Histology was primarily dedifferentiated liposarcoma for both groups (observation: 70% [14/20]; adjuvant palbociclib: 64% [9/14]). All patients underwent complete gross resection. Neither age, number of previous surgeries, histologic grade, or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status differed between groups (p > 0.05 for all). Patients selected for adjuvant palbociclib experienced a longer treatment interval than those selected for observation, although it did not reach statistical significance (20.5 months vs. 13.1 months, p = 0.08, log rank). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant palbociclib may be associated with a prolonged interval between liposarcoma resection and the need for re-resection or other systemic therapy. Palbociclib may be effective in delaying liposarcoma recurrence, and its use for this indication warrants prospective study.

Resection of Recurrent Pelvic Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Is the Risk Worth the Reward?

INTRODUCTION: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the pelvis present a surgical and oncological challenge. We investigated the outcomes of patients undergoing resection of pelvic sarcomas. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent surgical resection for STS between 2014 and 2021 at a tertiary academic referral center (n = 172). Included all patients with primary or recurrent STS which originated or extended to the pelvic cavity (n = 29). RESULTS: The cohort was divided into primary pelvic sarcomas (n = 18) and recurrent pelvic sarcomas (rPS, n = 11). Complete R0/R1 resection was achieved in 26 patients (89.6%). The postoperative complication rate was 48.3%. The rate of major complications was 27.5%. The median time of follow-up from surgery was 12.3 months (range, 0.6-60.3 months). Disease-free survival was superior in the primary pelvic sarcomas group compared to the rPS group (P = 0.002). However, there was no significant difference in overall survival, (P = 0.52). Univariant and multivariant analyses identified rPS group (Hazard Ratio 8.68, P = 0.006) and resection margins (Hazard Ratio 6.29, P = 0.004) to be independently associated with disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that achieving R0/R1 resection is feasible. Oncological outcomes are favorable for primary tumors, whereas recurrent tumors exhibit early recurrences. Consideration of resection of recurrent pelvic STS should involve a careful multidisciplinary evaluation.

Sarcopenia and frailty as predictors of surgical morbidity and oncologic outcomes in retroperitoneal sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare tumors for which surgical resection is the principal treatment. There is no established model to predict perioperative risks for RPS. We evaluated the association between preoperative sarcopenia, frailty, and hypoalbuminemia with surgical and oncological outcomes. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort analysis of 65 RPS patients who underwent surgical resection. Sarcopenia was defined as Total Psoas Area Index ≤ 1st quintile by sex. Frailty was estimated using the modified frailty index (mFI). Logistic regression models were used to assess predictors of 30-day postoperative morbidity. The Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was utilized to assess factors associated with overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULT: Sarcopenia was associated with worse OS with a median of 54 compared with 158 months (p = 0.04), but no differences in RFS (p > 0.05). Hypoalbuminemia was associated with worse OS with a median of 72 compared with 158 months (p < 0.01). MFI scores were not associated with OS or RFS (p > 0.05). Sarcopenia, mFI, and hypoalbuminemia were not associated with postoperative morbidity (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that sarcopenia may be utilized as a measure of overall fitness, rather than a cancer-specific risk, and the mFI is a poor predictive measure of outcomes in RPS.

The Use of Extracorporeal Circulation to Facilitate the Resection of a Large Retroperitoneal Sarcoma With Major Vessel Involvement: A Single-Center Review of 20 Cases.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the introduction of extracorporeal corporeal oxygenation (ECMO) to facilitate the surgical resection of large retroperitoneal sarcomas involving major vessels and to report preliminary outcomes. DESIGN: A case series. SETTING: At a tertiary university hospital and state sarcoma center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing retroperitoneal sarcoma resection requiring inferior vena cava (IVC) reconstruction between June 2018 and March 2022. INTERVENTION: ECMO for retroperitoneal tumor resection requiring IVC reconstruction. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 20 patients underwent ECMO-assisted retroperitoneal sarcoma resection and IVC reconstruction. The median age was 60.5 years (IQR 48-69); 15 women and 5 men. The median procedure and ECMO durations were 10.8 hours (IQR 8.5-12.4 hours) and 2.2 hours (IQR 62-218 minutes), respectively. The median intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay were 4 days (IQR 3-5 days) and 21 days (IQR 14-31 days), respectively. All 20 patients received packed cell transfusions (median 8 per patient [IQR 4-14]); 11 patients required fresh frozen plasma, 6 required platelets, and 11 required fibrinogen supplementation. One patient required recombinant activated factor VII. Sixteen patients experienced acute kidney injury, with 12 patients progressing to chronic kidney disease. Three patients were required to return to the operating room within 7 days, with no returns within the first 24 hours. There was no in-hospital or 30-day mortality. Survival at 3 years was 84%. CONCLUSIONS: ECMO for resecting large retroperitoneal tumor resection was introduced successfully and facilitated satisfactory outcomes for many patients who might otherwise have been considered too high risk.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting morbidity in surgically resected primary retroperitoneal sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is the cornerstone of the treatment for primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). The purpose of this study was to establish a nomogram predictive model for predicting postoperative morbidity in primary RPS. METHODS: Clinicopathological data of patients who underwent radical resection from 2009 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Risk factor analysis was performed using a logistic regression model, and modeling variables were selected based on Akaike Information Criterion. The nomogram prediction model was built on the basis of a binary logistic regression model and internally validated by calibration curves and concordance index. RESULTS: A total of 319 patients were enrolled, including 162 males (50.8%). 22.9% (n = 73) were over 65 years of age, and 70.2% (n = 224) had tumors larger than 10 cm. The most common histologic subtypes were well-differentiated liposarcoma (38.2%), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (25.1%) and leiomyosarcoma (7.8%). According to the Clavien-Dindo Classification, 96 (31.1%) and 31 (11.6%) patients had grade I-II complications and grade III-V complications, respectively. Age, tumor burden, location, operative time, number of combined organ resections, weighted resected organ score, estimated blood loss and packed RBC transfusion was used to construct the nomogram, and the concordance index of which was 0.795 (95% CI 0.746-0.844). and the calibration curve indicated a high agreement between predicted and actual rates. CONCLUSIONS: Nomogram, a visual predictive tool that integrates multiple clinicopathological factors, can help physicians screen RPS patients at high risk for postoperative complications and provide a basis for early intervention.

Aggressive surgical approach with vascular resection and reconstruction for retroperitoneal sarcomas: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Surgery is the mainstay of treatment and completeness of surgical resection is critical to achieve local control for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). En-bloc resection of adjacent organs, including major abdominal vessels, is often required to achieve negative margins. The aim of this review was to summarise the available evidence to assess the relative benefits and disadvantages of an aggressive surgical approach with vascular resection in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). METHODS: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE for relevant studies published from inception up to August 1, 2022. We performed a systematic review of the available studies to assess the safety and long-term survival results of vascular resection for RPS. RESULTS: We identified a total of 23 studies for our review. Overall postoperative in-hospital or 30-day mortality rate of patients with primary iliocaval leiomyosarcoma was 3% (11/359), and the major complication rate was 13%. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates after the follow-up period varied between 15% and 52%, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates ranged from 25 to 78%. Overall postoperative in-hospital or 30-day mortality rate of patients with RPSs receiving vascular resection was 3%, and the major complication rate was 27%. The RFS rates after the follow-up period were 18-86%, and the 5-year OS rates varied between 50% and 73%. There were no significant differences in the rates of RFS (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.74-1.19; p = 0.945) and OS (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.66-1.36; p = 0.774) between the extended resection group and tumour resection alone group. CONCLUSIONS: With adequate preparation and proper management, for patients with RPSs involving major vessels, aggressive surgical approach with vascular resection can achieve R0/R1 resection and improve survival.

Surgical treatment of recurrent retroperitoneal sarcoma in its different patterns: A 15-years' two-centers experience.

INTRODUCTION: There is limited data available regarding the role of surgery in the treatment of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) recurrences. We herein report the short- and mid-term outcomes of patients who underwent surgical treatment of RPS recurrences at two Italian centers over a 15-years' experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2005 to January 2020, 33 patients underwent surgical treatment of isolated locally recurrent RPS (LR group), locally recurrent RPS associated with the presence of distant recurrence (LR + DM group), and distant-only recurrent RPS (DM group). Only procedures performed to obtain a macroscopically radical treatment with curative intent were included. Data regarding pre-, intra-, post-operative course, and follow-up, collected in an Institutional database, were retrospectively analyzed, and compared. RESULTS: LR-group was composed of 15 patients, LR + DM group of 9 patients, and DM group of 9 patients. During the follow-up, 78.5% of the LR group, 77.8% of the DM group and 100% of the LR + DM group (p = 0.244) experienced a second recurrence. 7/11 (63.6%) patients in the LR group, 2/7 (28.5%) patients in the DM-group, and 0/9 (0.0%) patients in the LR + DM group underwent to almost one further local treatments of their recurrences (p = 0.010). No differences in the mean disease-free survival (p = 0.127), overall survival (OS) (p = 0.165) was reported among the three groups. Repeated surgery was an independent factor affecting survival in multivariate analysis (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A surgical treatment of RPS recurrences should always be taken into consideration, also in metastatic patients and/or in those who have already undergone surgery for previous RPS recurrence, because this approach may offer survival benefits.

Intraoperative motive for incomplete resection in primary retroperitoneal sarcoma.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical resection is the current standard of care for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Recent data suggests that up to 5% of patient have incomplete (R2) resection. The exact reason why patients scheduled for surgery with a curative intent to treat ended up with an R2 resection is largely unknown. AIM OF THE STUDY: To identify intraoperative findings responsible for incomplete (R2) resection in primary RPS. METHODS: All records of consecutive patients scheduled for a non-metastatic primary RPS surgery between 1995 and 2020 in a tertiary care sarcoma centre were retrospective analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 347 patients scheduled for surgery, 13 (3.7%) had an incomplete (R2) resection. The reasons for incomplete surgery were intraoperative finding of vascular involvement of great vessels in 5 patients, previously undetected peritoneal metastases in 5 patients, invasion of contralateral kidney/ureter in 2 patients and the need to preserve both kidneys in 1 patient because of his past medical history. Among these patients, 3 had a laparotomy without resection and 10 had a partial resection (i.e. debulking surgery). Severe postoperative complications occurred in 5 patients. The median length of stay in hospital was 19days. After a median follow-up of 12months, the median survival of patients after incomplete resection was 18months. The 1-y, 5-y and 8-y overall survival (OS) for these patients were 46%, 14%, and 7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Incomplete (R2) resection for a primary RPS surgery is rare in specialized sarcoma center. The next steps should be to identify the preoperative criteria that lead to this accurate selection and to define the best practice in front of a peroperative discovery of an unresectable RPS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The evolution of adjuvant/neoadjuvant trials for resectable localized sarcoma.

Soft-tissue sarcomas are rare tumors arising from mesenchymal tissues. As a heterogeneous group comprising more than 50 types, the development of clinical trials remains challenging. Decision-making for neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy is based on the available evidence of contemporary trials and multidisciplinary clinical judgment.

Factors associated with disease-free and abdominal recurrence-free survival in abdominopelvic and retroperitoneal sarcomas.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Retroperitoneal and abdominopelvic sarcomas are rare heterogeneous malignancies. The only therapy proven to improve disease-free survival (DFS) is R0/R1 surgical resection. We sought to analyze whether additional factors such as radiation and systemic therapy were associated with DFS and abdominal recurrence-free survival (RFS). METHODS: Retrospective review of adults (≥18) with resectable abdominopelvic and retroperitoneal sarcomas who underwent intent-to-cure surgery at a high-volume tertiary referral center between 1998 and 2015. The main outcome measures were DFS and abdominal RFS. RESULTS: Overall, 159 patients met the criteria for inclusion. Median follow-up was 4.8 years (range 0.1-18.9 years). The most common histology was liposarcoma (49%). Systemic therapy was administered to 48% of patients and was not associated with improved outcomes. The neoadjuvant radiotherapy group (11%) had improved adjusted DFS (5.46 years, 95% CI [3.68, 7.24] vs. 3.1 years, 95% CI [2.48, 3.73]) and abdominal RFS (6.14 years, 95% CI [4.38, 7.89] vs. 3.22 years, 95% CI [2.61, 3.84]). The adjuvant radiotherapy group (19%) had no improvement. CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of patients undergoing resection for retroperitoneal or abdominopelvic sarcoma, neoadjuvant radiation improved DFS and abdominal RFS. A follow-up of over three years was needed to appreciate a difference in outcomes.

Impact of time to first relapse on long-term outcome in adult retroperitoneal sarcoma patients after radical resection.

BACKGROUND: Local recurrence of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is one of the major causes of treatment failure and death. We attempted to assess the effects of time to local recurrence (TLR) on the survival after recurrence (SAR) and overall survival (OS) of RPS. METHODS: Included in this study were 224 patients who underwent R0 resection for primary RPS at our institution between January 2000 and December 2020, 118 of whom had local recurrence. Based on the median TLR (19.8 months), patients were divided into two groups: early local recurrence (ELR < 20 months) and late local recurrence (LLR > 20 months). The Kaplan-Meier method was employed to calculate the local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), SAR and OS. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to explore the prognostic value of TLR. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 60.5 months for the entire cohort and 58.5 months for the recurrence cohort. There were 60 (50.8%) patients in the ELR group and 58 (49.2%) in the LLR group. The ELR group exhibited a worse SAR (29.2 months vs. 73.4 months, P < 0.001), OS (41.8 months vs. 120.9 months, P < 0.001), and a lower 5-year OS rate (35.9% vs. 73.2%, P = 0.004) than the LLR group. Furthermore, multivariate analysis indicated that TLR was an independent prognostic indicator for SAR (P = 0.014) and OS (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RPS, ELR after R0 resection presents adverse effects on OS and SAR than those with LLR, and TLR could serve as a promising predictor for OS and SAR.

Survival and prognostic factors in patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy for lung metastases from retroperitoneal sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Soft-tissue sarcomas are rare malignancies that consist of many different histologic subtypes and arise in various locations in the body. In patients with lung metastases from retroperitoneal sarcomas, the long-term outcomes and prognostic factors are unknown. This study is a retrospective review of patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy for retroperitoneal sarcoma metastases at one institution, with the purpose of determining prognostic factors and clinical outcomes. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy for lung metastases from various sarcomas at Okayama University Hospital from January 2006 to December 2018. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for the analyses, and cut-off values of continuous variables were determined by a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients underwent the first pulmonary metastasectomy for lung metastases from retroperitoneal sarcoma in our hospital. Leiomyosarcoma was the most common histologic subtype of retroperitoneal sarcoma (79.2%, n = 19). Median overall survival was 49.9 months, and the 3-year and 5-year survival rates after the first pulmonary metastasectomy were 62.5% and 26.4% respectively. In univariate analysis, age ≥56 years, disease-free interval < 15 months, and size of metastasis (≥ 27 mm) were associated with poor survival. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary metastasectomy can be considered as an effective management strategy in retroperitoneal sarcoma patients with lung metastases in appropriately selected cases, just as it is for other sarcomas.

Unplanned reoperation after resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma: experience based on a high-volume sarcoma center.

BACKGROUND: Most retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) operations require combined multi-organ resection, and the proportion of unplanned reoperation is high. However, there are no relevant studies on reoperation for RPS. METHODS: Patients who underwent at least once unplanned reoperation at Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, China, from August 2009 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The baseline characteristics, primary surgery, and reoperation information, postoperative complications, and survival were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were included. Among them, 21 (41.2%) were male and 30 (58.8%) were female. The median age was 51 (interquartile range [IQR], 49-63) years. Most (88.3%) had a history of abdominal surgery. Dedifferentiated liposarcoma, well-differentiated liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and others accounted for 50.9%, 21.6%, 15.7%, and 11.8%, respectively. The conditions of the primary operation were as follows: 35 (68.6%) patients achieved complete surgical resection, 48 patients had combined organ resection, and a median of 3 (IQR, 2-4) organs was removed, of which 5 (9.9%) were combined with pancreaticoduodenectomy. The median operative time was 330 (IQR, 245-440) min, and the median estimated blood loss was 1500 (IQR, 500-2600) ml. The median postoperative hospital stay was 42 (IQR, 23-82) days. For reoperation, the most common reasons were bleeding (31.3%), complications related to intestinal anastomosis (27.4%), and intestinal perforation (19.9%). The mortality rate after reoperation was 39.2% (20/51). Twelve (23.5%) patients underwent reoperation at least twice. CONCLUSIONS: Unplanned reoperation among retroperitoneal sarcoma correlates with established measures of surgical quality.

Which style of duodenojejunostomy is better after resection of distal duodenum.

BACKGROUND: Distal duodenal resections are sometimes necessary for radical surgery, but how to restore duodenal continuity is still unclear. This study aimed at determining which style of anastomosis was more suitable for the duodenojejunostomy after resection of distal duodenum. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 34 patients who underwent distal duodenum resection at our center between January 2014 and December 2021. According to whether the end or the side of the proximal duodenum was involved in reconstruction, duodenojejunostomy were classified as End style (E-style) and Side style (S-style). Demographic data, clinicopathological details, and postoperative complications were analyzed between two groups. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (38.2%) received E-style duodenojejunostomy, and 21 patients (62.8%) received S-style duodenojejunostomy. Comparative analysis showed that in group of E-style, patients had a lower rate of multivisceral resection(5/13 vs 18/21; P = 0.008), delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (1/13 vs 11/21; P = 0.011) and intraperitoneal infection (2/13 vs 12/21; P = 0.03). In this study, the incidence of major complications was up to 35.3% (12/34) and no patient died of complication in perioperative period. In two group, there was no difference in the incidence of major complications (E-style vs S-style: 3/13 vs 9/21; P = 0.292). CONCLUSIONS: The E-style duodenojejunostomy for the reconstruction of distal duodenum resection is safe and feasible. The E-style anastomosis may have potential value in decreasing the occurrence of complications such as DGE and intraperitoneal infection, and the definitive advantages still need to be verified.

Intraoperative electron radiation therapy after salvage surgery in gynecological cancers and retroperitoneal sarcomas: outcomes and adverse effects.

Background: Salvage surgery is considered an option for isolated recurrences of retroperitoneal and pelvic tumors, in patients who have undergone previous radiotherapy. In order to increase local control intra operative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) can be used in these patients to administer additional radiation dose. We evaluated the outcomes and adverse effects in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma and gynecologic tumors after salvage surgery and IOERT. Materials and methods: Twenty patients were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-three IOERT treatments were performed after surgery. Six (30%) were sarcoma and 14 (70%) were gynecological carcinoma. Administered dose depended on previous dose received with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and proximity to critical structures. The toxicities were scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Results: The median age of the patients was 51 years (range 34-70). After a median follow-up of 32 months (range 1-68), in the sarcoma group the local control rate was 66.6%; while in the gynecological group the local control rate was 64.3%. In relation to late toxicity, one patient had a Grade 2 vesicovaginal fistula, and one patient presented Grade 4 enterocolitis and enteric intestinal fistula. Conclusions: IOERT could have a role in the treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas in primary tumors after EBRT, as it may suggest a benefit in local control or recurrences after surgical resection in those at high risk of microscopic residual disease. The addition of IOERT to salvage resection for isolated recurrence of gynecologic cancers suggest favorable local control in cases with concern for residual microscopic disease.