Long-term Outcome of Risankizumab in Crohn's Disease: a Real-world GETAID Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of risankizumab maintenance treatment in a large real-world cohort of patients with Crohn's Disease (CD). METHODS: From May 2021 to August 2023, all consecutive patients with CD treated with risankizumab in 25 GETAID centers have been retrospectively included. The primary endpoint was steroid-free clinical remission (Harvey Bradshaw Index [HBI] <5) at 52 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 174 patients included, 99%, 93%, and 96% had been previously exposed to anti-TNF, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab, respectively. All patients had received ≥3 biologics, and 108 (62%) had previous intestinal resection. Median follow-up was 13.7 months (interquartile range, 10.0-18.1 months). The rates of steroid-free clinical remission and clinical remission at week 26 were 47% (72/152) and 52% (79/152), and 46% (58/125), and 48% (60/125) at week 52, respectively. Risankizumab persistence rates were 94%, 89%, and 79% at weeks 12, 26, and 52, respectively. At the end of follow-up, 45 (45/174; 26%) patients had discontinued risankizumab (loss of response, 42%; primary failure, 37%; intolerance, 13%). Thirty-six patients (36/174; 20.9%) were hospitalized, and 22 (22/174; 12.6%) required intestinal resection. Fifty-one patients (29%) had an adverse event, including 26 (15%) serious adverse events (CD flare, n = 17). One death (myocardial infarction) and one cancer (papillary thyroid carcinoma) were observed. CONCLUSION: This is the first real-life study to report long-term outcomes in patients with refractory CD treated with risankizumab. One-half of the patients achieved steroid-free clinical remission after 1 year, and the safety profile was consistent with the literature.

Autoreactivity to self-antigens LL37 and ADAMTSL5 influences the clinical response to risankizumab in psoriatic patients.

The autoantigens LL37 and ADAMTSL5 contribute to induce pathogenetic T-cells responses in a subset of psoriatic patients. Whether the presence of LL37-and/or ADAMTS5-reactive T-cells influences the clinical response to treatment is still unknown. The aim of the study is to evaluate the clinical responses to the anti-IL-23 risankizumab in LL37 and/or ADAMTSL5-reactive patients in comparison with non-reactive ones and to assess whether genetics (HLA-Cw06.02) or BMI influences the response to treatment. Patients were screened at baseline for the presence of circulating LL37 or/and ADAMTSL5-reactive T-cells and were treated as per protocol with risankizumab. Effectiveness data (PASI scores) were collected at weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52. Data were also analyzed based on HLA-Cw06.02 status and BMI. The overall response to treatment of patients with autoreactivity to LL37 or ADAMTSL5 did not differ compared to the non-reactive cohort as measured as PASI75/90/100 at different time points; however, subjects that had autoreactive T-cells to both LL37 and ADAMTS5 demonstrated suboptimal response to treatment starting at week16. HLA-Cw06:02+ patients demonstrated faster response to risankizumab at week 4 compared to HLA-Cw06:02-. Additionally, the response to treatment was influenced by the BMI with slower responses seen in overweight and obese patients at week 4 and week16. In conclusion, while the presence of either LL37-and ADAMTS5-reactive circulating T-cells do not influence the clinical response to risankizumab, the presence of the double reactivity to both LL37 and ADAMTS5 decreases the clinical responses. Moreover, we evidenced that HLA-Cw06+ respond faster to IL-23 inhibition and that BMI, associated to autoreactivity, can influence the speed in response.

Real-world effectiveness of risankizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis using the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis, an inflammatory skin disease, is often treated with biologic therapeutics. OBJECTIVE: To determine the real-world treatment effectiveness of risankizumab, an interleukin-23 inhibitor, in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was conducted using the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry for eligible adults with a diagnosis of moderate-to-severe psoriasis and persistent use of risankizumab at 12 (±3) months after initiation. Skin clearance measures and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed for the entire study population and by prior biologic treatment. RESULTS: Among 287 patients with persistent risankizumab use at 1 year, most achieved clear or clear/almost clear skin and reported significant reductions in Dermatology Life Quality Index scores, psoriasis symptoms (fatigue, skin pain, and overall itch), and work and activity impairment. LIMITATIONS: The CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry is not necessarily representative of all adults with psoriasis in the United States and Canada and does not measure patient adherence. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with risankizumab, regardless of prior treatment, achieved high levels of clear and clear/almost clear skin, Dermatology Life Quality Index scores of 0/1, and significant reductions in psoriasis symptoms (fatigue, skin pain, and overall itch) and work and activity impairment 1 year after initiation.

Vaccination recommendations for adults receiving biologics and oral therapies for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Delphi consensus from the medical board of the National Psoriasis Foundation.

BACKGROUND: For psoriatic patients who need to receive nonlive or live vaccines, evidence-based recommendations are needed regarding whether to pause or continue systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate literature regarding vaccine efficacy and safety and to generate consensus-based recommendations for adults receiving systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis receiving nonlive or live vaccines. METHODS: Using a modified Delphi process, 22 consensus statements were developed by the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board and COVID-19 Task Force, and infectious disease experts. RESULTS: Key recommendations include continuing most oral and biologic therapies without modification for patients receiving nonlive vaccines; consider interruption of methotrexate for nonlive vaccines. For patients receiving live vaccines, discontinue most oral and biologic medications before and after administration of live vaccine. Specific recommendations include discontinuing most biologic therapies, except for abatacept, for 2-3 half-lives before live vaccine administration and deferring next dose 2-4 weeks after live vaccination. LIMITATIONS: Studies regarding infection rates after vaccination are lacking. CONCLUSION: Interruption of antipsoriatic oral and biologic therapies is generally not necessary for patients receiving nonlive vaccines. Temporary interruption of oral and biologic therapies before and after administration of live vaccines is recommended in most cases.

Efficacy and safety of risankizumab for Crohn's disease in patients from Asian countries: a post hoc subanalysis of the global phase 3 ADVANCE, MOTIVATE, and FORTIFY studies.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The anti-interleukin-23 antibody risankizumab is being investigated as a treatment for moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease. This post hoc subanalysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of risankizumab therapy in Asian patients. METHODS: ADVANCE (NCT03105128) and MOTIVATE (NCT03104413) were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 induction studies. Patients with intolerance/inadequate response to biologic (MOTIVATE) and/or conventional therapy (ADVANCE) were randomized to receive intravenous risankizumab (600 or 1200 mg) or placebo at weeks 0, 4, and 8. Clinical responders to risankizumab could enter the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled maintenance withdrawal study (FORTIFY; NCT03105102). Patients were rerandomized to receive subcutaneous risankizumab (180 or 360 mg) or placebo (withdrawal) every 8 weeks for 52 weeks. RESULTS: Among 198 Asian patients in the induction studies, clinical remission and endoscopic response at week 12 were achieved by 61.4% and 40.0%, 59.5% and 35.8%, and 27.3% and 9.1% of patients in the risankizumab 600 mg, risankizumab 1200 mg, and placebo groups, respectively. Among 67 patients who entered the maintenance study, clinical remission and endoscopic response at week 52 were achieved by 57.1% and 52.4%, 75.0% and 40.0%, and 53.8% and 34.6% of patients in the risankizumab 180 mg, risankizumab 360 mg, and placebo (withdrawal) groups, respectively. Fistula closure was observed with risankizumab treatment in 28.6% (induction) and 57.1% (maintenance) of patients. Efficacy trends and safety profile were similar to those in non-Asian patients. CONCLUSION: Consistent with non-Asian and global population results, risankizumab was effective and well tolerated in Asian patients with Crohn's disease.

A narrative review of the literature: The role of biologics and JAK inhibitors in vitiligo.

Vitiligo is a chronic depigmenting disorder that significantly impacts the quality of life of patients. Though there have been significant advancements in targeted therapies in skin diseases such as psoriasis or eczema, the progress in the treatment of vitiligo has been slow, with minimal studies assessing the effect of biologics, though there has been recent evidence of the effectiveness of JAK inhibition. This paper reviews the published case reports and studies for the use of systemic targeted therapies including biologics and JAK inhibitors in vitiligo.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Biologic and Small-Molecule Therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, necessitates long-term medical therapy to manage symptoms and prevent complications. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has emerged as a strategy to optimize treatment efficacy, particularly with anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) alpha drugs. This review explores the role of TDM for non-anti-TNF advanced therapies in IBD, focusing on vedolizumab, ustekinumab, tofacitinib, upadacitinib, risankizumab and ozanimod. Methods: The literature search, conducted through OVID (Medline) and PubMed, delves into proactive versus reactive TDM, timing of monitoring and methods for measuring drug levels and anti-drug antibodies. Results: While ustekinumab and vedolizumab exhibit exposure-response relationships, consensus on target levels and the role of TDM adjustments remains elusive. Limited data on risankizumab suggest a dose-dependent response, while for small molecule therapies (janus kinase inhibitors and ozanimod), the absence of real-world data and commercially available TDM tools pose challenges. Conclusion: At present, with the available data, there is a limited role for TDM in non-anti-TNF biologic and small-molecule therapies. This review underscores the need for further research to delineate the utility of TDM in guiding treatment decisions for these agents.

Real-world Safety and Efficacy of Risankizumab in Psoriatic Patients: A Multicenter, Retrospective, and Not-interventional Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Risankizumab - a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets the p19 subunit of IL-23 - has been recently approved to treat moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Real-world data based on a representative pool of patients are currently lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess the mid- and long-term safety and efficacy profile of risankizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the routine clinical practice. METHODS: This was a retrospective and multicenter study of consecutive psoriatic patients on risankizumab from April 2020 through November 2022. The primary endpoint was the number of patients who achieved a 100% improvement in their Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) (PASI100) on week 52. RESULTS: A total of 510 patients, 198 (38.8%) women and 312 (61.2%) men were included in the study. The mean age was 51.7±14.4 years. A total of 227 (44.5%) study participants were obese (body mass index [BMI] >30kg/m2). The mean baseline PASI score was 11.4±7.2, and the rate of patients who achieved PASI100 on week 52, 67.0%. Throughout the study follow-up, 21%, 50.0%, 59.0%, and 66% of the patients achieved PASI100 on weeks 4, 16, 24, and 40, respectively. The number of patients who achieved a PASI ≤2 was greater in the group with a BMI ≤30kg/m2 on weeks 4 (P=.04), 16 (P=.001), and 52 (P=.002). A statistically significantly greater number of patients achieved PASI100 in the treatment-naïve group on weeks 16 and 52 (P=.001 each, respectively). On week 16 a significantly lower number of participants achieved PASI100 in the group with psoriatic arthropathy (P=.04). Among the overall study sample, 22 (4.3%) patients reported some type of adverse event and 20 (3.9%) discontinued treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Risankizumab proved to be a safe and effective therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the routine clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of risankizumab for active psoriatic arthritis: 52-week results from the KEEPsAKE 1 study.

OBJECTIVE: PsA is a chronic disease with heterogeneous clinical manifestations requiring treatment options with long-term efficacy and safety. In this follow-up analysis, the 52-week efficacy and safety of risankizumab 150 mg in patients with active PsA who had previous inadequate response/intolerance to one or more conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARD-IR) were evaluated. METHODS: KEEPsAKE 1 is an ongoing, global, phase 3 study with a 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled period (period 1) and an open-label extension period (period 2). In period 1, eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous risankizumab 150 mg or placebo at weeks 0, 4 and 16. At week 24 (period 2), all continuing patients received open-label risankizumab 150 mg every 12 weeks through week 208. RESULTS: At week 24, 57.3% of risankizumab-treated patients (n = 483) achieved ≥20% improvement in ACR criteria (ACR20) vs 33.5% of placebo-treated patients (n = 481; P < 0.001). At week 52, 70.0% of patients who were randomized to receive continuous risankizumab therapy and 63.0% of patients who were randomized to receive placebo in period 1 and then receive risankizumab at week 24 achieved ACR20. Similar result trends were observed for other efficacy measures. Risankizumab was well tolerated through 52 weeks of treatment with a consistent safety profile from week 24 through week 52. CONCLUSION: In patients with active PsA who were csDMARD-IR, continuous risankizumab treatment demonstrated robust long-term efficacy and was well tolerated through 52 weeks of treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, KEEPsAKE1, NCT03675308.

Efficacy and safety of risankizumab for active psoriatic arthritis: 52-week results from the KEEPsAKE 2 study.

OBJECTIVE: PsA is a chronic inflammatory disease in which the skin and joints are affected. In this follow-up analysis, the 52-week efficacy and safety of risankizumab 150 mg in patients with active PsA who had previous inadequate response/intolerance to one or two biologic therapies (Bio-IR) or one or more conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARD-IR) were evaluated. METHODS: In the ongoing, phase 3, KEEPsAKE 2 trial, patients with active PsA were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous risankizumab 150 mg or placebo at weeks 0, 4 and 16 (period 1). At week 24 (period 2), patients who received placebo were switched to risankizumab, and all patients received risankizumab 150 mg every 12 weeks from weeks 28 to 208. RESULTS: At week 24, 51.3% of risankizumab-treated patients (n = 224) achieved ≥20% improvement in ACR criteria (ACR 20) vs 26.5% of placebo-treated patients (n = 220; P < 0.001). At week 52, 58.5% of patients randomized to receive continuous risankizumab achieved ACR20, and 55.7% of patients who switched from placebo to risankizumab at week 24 achieved ACR20. Similar trends were observed for other efficacy measures. Rates of serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and TEAEs leading to discontinuation remained stable through week 52, and no deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: Risankizumab was well tolerated and improved symptoms of PsA in Bio-IR/csDMARD-IR patients, with a consistent long-term safety profile from weeks 24 to 52. TRIAL REGISTRATION: United States National Library of Medicine clinical trials database www.clinicaltrials.gov; KEEPsAKE 2; NCT03671148.

Predictors for the effectiveness of 75 mg risankizumab in treating psoriasis-A real-word evidence from a 52-week retrospective study.

In the registration trial of risankizumab for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in Japan, similar Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) responses were observed for 75 mg or 150 mg risankizumab at most time points up to 52 weeks, except for PASI 100 at week 16. The use of 75 mg risankizumab offers an attractive option considering the high cost of risankizumab. However, it is unknown whether patients with mild-to-moderate psoriasis respond similarly, and the efficacy data of non-Japanese patients is also lacking. We retrospectively included 30 consecutive Chinese patients receiving half-dose (75 mg) risankizumab as scheduled up to 52 weeks. Compared with biologic-experienced group, biologic-naive group had a significantly higher PASI 50/75/90/100 achievement (p = 0.0098/0.0039/0.0016/0.0054) at week 52. PASI 50/75/90/100 curves in biologic-naive group (p = 0.0117/0.0239/0.0143/0.0269) were also significantly higher when analysed generalized estimating equations (GEE) model. Though there was no statistically significant difference in terms of PASI 50/75/90/100 responses at any time points between those with body weight ≦ 65 kg and those >65 kg, a tendency of secondary failure was noted in those >65 kg from week 40 onwards. Patients who were both biologic-naive and weighed ≦ 65 kg achieved sustained PASI 50/75/90 responses from week 16/28/40 onwards, respectively, indicating that they could be considered as potential candidates for 75 mg risankizumab. Though PASI 75 curve in patients without diabetes mellitus (DM) surpassed that in patient without DM, curves of other parameters did not reach significance when analysed by GEE model. There was no HBV, HCV or TB reactivation, nor other new safety signals during the 52-week observational period. Providing risankizumab with flexible dosing options is beneficial in clinical practice considering the high cost of this medication.

Possible role of IL-23 inhibitor in autoimmune hemolytic anemia.

Rituximab and prednisone are commonly used treatments for autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), where the body's immune system attacks and destroys its red blood cells. However, some AIHA patients may become refractory to rituximab treatment, and this can result in continued hemolysis and persistent anemia, making it challenging for affected individuals to manage their symptoms. The underlying causes of rituximab refractoriness in AIHA patients can be complex and vary from patient to patient. Herein, we present a case of newly diagnosed warm and cold AIHA that remained in remission with an interleukin-23 inhibitor.

Potential cerebrovascular accident signal for risankizumab: A disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

AIMS: The interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitor risankizumab was recently approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in the United States. Low rates of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) were observed in risankizumab-treated patients during clinical trials. The aim of this study was to determine whether risankizumab may be associated with CVA in a real-world setting. METHODS: A retrospective disproportionality analysis was conducted utilizing postmarketing adverse event reports submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) through the fourth quarter of 2021. A custom query consisting of 22 CVA-related Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) preferred terms previously reported in clinical trials of plaque psoriasis medications was used to identify cases. Disproportionality was measured by calculating reporting odds ratios (ROR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), whereby the lower limit of a 95% CI >1.0 and ≥ three cases was considered a signal. RESULTS: Risankizumab was associated with significantly disproportionate CVA reporting compared to all other drugs in FAERS (ROR 2.48; 95% CI 2.14-2.88) as well as 11 alternative plaque psoriasis therapeutics across five pharmacologic classes. The largest disproportionality signals for risankizumab were identified relative to apremilast (ROR 9.07; 95% CI 7.56-10.89), ixekizumab (ROR 6.75; 95% CI 5.14-8.86), guselkumab (ROR 6.74; 95% CI 4.68-9.71), certolizumab (ROR 5.70; 95% CI 4.74-6.85) and etanercept (ROR 4.91; 95% CI 4.21-5.73). CONCLUSION: This study detected a previously unreported signal of disproportionate CVA reporting with the real-world use of risankizumab. Further long-term observational data will be necessary to better characterize this unconfirmed potential safety signal.

Long-term safety and efficacy of risankizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: Interim analysis of the LIMMitless open-label extension trial up to 5 years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease often requiring long-term therapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of risankizumab in patients with psoriasis. METHODS: LIMMitless is an ongoing phase 3, open-label extension study evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of continuous risankizumab 150 mg every 12 weeks for adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis following multiple phase 2/3 base studies. This interim analysis assessed safety (ie, monitored treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]) through 304 weeks. Efficacy assessments included determining the proportion of patients who achieved ≥90% or 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90/100), static Physician's Global Assessment of clear/almost clear (sPGA 0/1), and Dermatology Life Quality Index of no effect on patient's life (DLQI 0/1) through 256 weeks. RESULTS: Among 897 patients randomized to risankizumab in the base studies, 706 were still ongoing at data cutoff. Rates of TEAEs, TEAEs leading to discontinuation, and TEAEs of safety interest were low. At week 256, 85.1%/52.3% of patients achieved PASI 90/100, respectively, 85.8% achieved sPGA 0/1, and 76.4% achieved DLQI 0/1. LIMITATIONS: Open-label study with no placebo or active-comparator group. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term continuous risankizumab treatment for up to 5 years was well tolerated and demonstrated high and durable efficacy.

Risankizumab-rzaa: A New Therapeutic Option for the Treatment of Crohn's Disease.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacologic and clinical profile of risankizumab-rzaa in the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD). DATA SOURCES: A PubMed search was performed from inception to August 2022 using keywords risankizumab, risankizumab-rzaa, interleukin-23 inhibitor, and Crohn's disease. Information was obtained from package inserts as well as published abstracts. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Phase 2 and 3 studies plus relevant literature on risankizumab-rzaa pharmacologic and clinical profile were reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Risankizumab-rzaa approval was based on ADVANCE, MOTIVATE, and FORTIFY. In these 3 phase 3 studies involving patients with moderate to severe CD, risankizumab-rzaa, when compared with placebo, resulted in clinical remission and endoscopic response in a significantly higher proportion of patients in both the induction and maintenance phase. In addition, risankizumab-rzaa met the secondary endpoints of clinical response, endoscopic improvement, corticosteroid-free remission, and mucosal healing. Common adverse events noted include nasopharyngitis, arthralgia, headache, abdominal pain, and nausea. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Risankizumab-rzaa is the first selective IL-23 inhibitor approved for CD and provides an additional therapeutic option for patients, particularly those who have been previously treated with other advanced inflammatory bowel disease therapies. Additional studies are required to determine how to best position risankizumab-rzaa in both bio-naïve and bio-experienced patients with CD. CONCLUSIONS: Risankizumab-rzaa is the most recent therapeutic advance for CD. It has a selective mechanism of action with a similar safety profile comparable with other currently approved advanced therapies.

Efficacy and Safety of IL-12/23 and IL-23 Inhibitors for Crohn's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Targeting interleukin-23 (IL-23) is an important therapeutic strategy for Crohn's disease (CD). AIMS: This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of selective IL-23p19 and IL-12/23p40 inhibitors in patients with moderate-to-severe CD. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library (CENTRAL) were searched from inception to May 24, 2023, for randomized, placebo- or active comparator-controlled induction and/or maintenance trials of selective IL-23p19 and IL-12/23p40 inhibitors in pediatric and adult patients with CD. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in clinical remission. Secondary outcomes were clinical response, endoscopic remission, endoscopic response, and safety. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the GRADE criteria, respectively. RESULTS: Eighteen trials (n = 5561) were included. Most studies were rated as low risk of bias. Targeting IL-23 was significantly superior to placebo for inducing clinical (risk ratio [RR] = 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-2.21) and endoscopic (RR = 3.20, 95%CI 2.17-4.70) remission and maintaining clinical remission (RR = 1.39, 95%CI 1.10-1.77) (GRADE high certainty evidence for all outcomes). Subgroup analysis showed that targeting IL-23 was superior to placebo for inducing clinical remission in biologic-naïve (RR = 2.20, 95%CI 1.46-3.32, I2 = 0%, p = 0.39) and biologic-experienced patients (RR = 1.82, 95%CI 1.27-2.60, I2 = 56.5%, p = 0.01). Targeting IL-23 was associated with a decreased risk of serious adverse events in induction (RR = 0.55, 95%CI 0.44-0.73) and maintenance (RR = 0.72, 95%CI 0.53-0.98) trials compared to placebo (high certainty evidence). CONCLUSION: Targeting IL-23 is effective and safe for inducing and maintaining clinical and endoscopic remission in patients with moderate-to-severe CD.

Brodalumab-Induced Eczematous Reactions in Psoriasis Patients: Management With Switching to Risankizumab.

Biological treatments targeting IL-17 are highly efficacious with rapid onset of action in psoriasis. Cutaneous adverse events are associated with different biological treatments, including paradoxical psoriasis and eczematous reactions. Brodalumab was previously suggested as an alternative treatment option in psoriasis patients who developed dermatitis or paradoxical psoriasis while on a biologic. Here we report three psoriasis patients who developed brodalumab induced eczematous reaction with complete clearance after switching to risankizumab. Early recognition is crucial for appropriate management. We propose switching patients with psoriasis who develop severe eczematous reaction while on a biologic targeting IL-17 to an IL 23 inhibitor due to efficacy in psoriasis and rarely reported eczematous reaction.

The Effectiveness of Risankizumab Following Guselkumab Failure in Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis Patients: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a strong genetic predisposition and autoimmune component that is often treated with immunomodulators such as biologic therapy. Guselkumab is a biologic treatment option that selectively targets the p19 subunit of interleukin (IL)-23; risankizumab is a more recently developed monoclonal antibody of the same class that targets IL-23p19. There is limited research around effective treatment response with intra class switching within IL-23-targeted therapies for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: The purpose is to assess patient response to risankizumab after guselkumab failure for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 13 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Physical examination findings were converted to a 5-point static physicians' global assessment (sPGA) score. Baseline, 4-month, and 12-month sPGA scores were assigned from visits immediately prior to and during their course of risankizumab treatment. sPGA scores were analyzed to compare changes between baseline and 4 months and 12 months of therapy. RESULTS: Patients treated with risankizumab had lower sPGA scores after both 4 and 12 months compared to their baseline sPGA score. 46% of patients met the primary outcome of an sPGA score of 0 or 1 at 4 months of risankizumab, increasing to 90% of patients at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reflect an improvement in sPGA scores when patients are treated with risankizumab following guselkumab failure. This highlights the benefit of in-class switch to risankizumab when patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis have failed multiple treatments including guselkumab.

Risankizumab in Adults with Psoriatic Arthritis.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory musculoskeletal disease associated with psoriasis. Its major clinical domains include peripheral and axial arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis and skin and nail involvement. Approximately 30% of patients with psoriasis develop psoriatic arthritis. The pathophysiology of PsA is complex and involves a dysregulated immune response. In particular, interleukin (IL)-23 is a major regulatory cytokine that has been implicated in PsA, including bone remodeling, enthesitis, synovitis and psoriatic lesions. Risankizumab is a humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that targets the p19 subunit of IL-23. It has been approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and, more recently, PsA. The efficacy and safety of risankizumab for the treatment of PsA has been demonstrated in phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials. Risankizumab showed efficacy in decreasing the number of swollen and tender joints, clearing psoriatic plaque and improving quality of life. Treatment with risankizumab was well-tolerated, with the most common adverse event being upper respiratory tract infection. Overall, the current literature demonstrates that risankizumab is both a safe and effective therapeutic option for the treatment of PsA. Herein, week 24 and 52 results are reviewed.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa and JAK Inhibitors: A Review of the Published Literature.

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), also known as acne inversa or Verneuil's disease, is a chronic, inflammatory, recurrent, and debilitating skin disease of the hair follicles characterized by inflammatory, painful, deep-rooted lesions in the areas of the body characterized by the presence of the apocrine glands. Unfortunately, huge unmet needs still remain for its treatment. Objective: The purpose of our review was collecting all cases, case series, trials, and ongoing studies available in the literature on the use of this class of drugs for HS. Materials and Methods: The investigated manuscripts included trials, reviews, letters to the editor, real-life studies, case series, and reports. Manuscripts were identified, screened, and extracted for the relevant data following the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. Results: We selected 56 articles of which 25 met the selection criteria for our review. Among the JAK inhibitors to date, there is only one published clinical trial in the literature (Janus kinase 1 inhibitor INCB054707), a real-life study with 15 patients up to week 24 in which upadacitinib was used and a case series where tofacitinib was successfully used. Conversely, there are several ongoing clinical trials. Conclusions: Results to date in the literature show promising levels of efficacy and the safety of JAK inhibitors in HS. Several clinical trials are underway from which it will be very important to compare the available data. There are still too few studies conducted with a low sample size, so it remains critical to investigate this issue further in the future with a real-life study involving a large sample of patients in order to provide safe and viable therapeutic alternatives for HS.