Relative position of sacral base in the pelvis and its correlation with spino-pelvic parameters.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between relative location of the sacral base and spinal alignment in standing healthy adult volunteers. METHODS: One hundred seventy-two volunteers (men = 83, mean age = 39.3 years [20-70], women = 89, mean age = 39.6 years [20-62]) with no history of spinal disease were imaged using a low-dose biplanar slot-scanning 3D X-ray imaging system. A circle was drawn around three points: cranial vertex of the iliac crest (A), caudal vertex of the ischium (B), and anterior vertex of the pubis. Pelvic height (PH) was defined as the diameter (A-B). A tangent line perpendicular to PH (C) was drawn by passing through (A). Sacral height (SH) was defined as the distance between (C) and the center of the sacral base parallel to PH. Relative SH (rSH) was calculated as SH/PH × 100. RESULTS: Mean (SD) rSH was 18.3 ± 3.2 (men 20.0 ± 2.9, women 16.7 ± 2.6). rSH significantly positively correlated with thoracic kyphosis (r = 0.20, p < 0.05), lumbar lordosis (r = 0.28, p < 0.05), pelvic incidence (r = 0.28, p < 0.05), and sacral slope (r = 0.32, p < 0.0001), and significantly negatively correlated with pelvic thickness (r = - 0.66, p < 0.0001). rSH did not correlate with pelvic tilt. CONCLUSION: The center of the sacral base is normally located 3.8 ± 0.8 cm caudal to the cranial vertex of the iliac crest. The sacral base was located more caudally in men than in women, regardless of age. The more caudal the sacral base, the angle of the spino-pelvic parameters (TK, LL, PI, SS) progressively increases along with a decrease in the sacro-acetabular distance (Pth). Pelvic tilt did not correlate with the location of the sacrum.

Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment in rapidly destructive coxarthrosis.

PURPOSE: To investigate the sagittal spino-pelvic alignment (SSPA) in patients with rapidly destructive coxarthrosis (RDC). METHODS: SSPA was investigated in 44 patients with RDC and 70 patients with hip osteoarthritis (HOA). The study included only female patients over the age of 70 years because epidemiological reports indicate that RDC most commonly occurs in this group of patients. The SSPA parameters that were analyzed included lumbar lordosis (LL), lumbar range of motion (ΔLL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), and pelvic tilt (PT). The pelvic inclination angle (PIA) in the supine position and the change in the PIA from the supine to the standing position (ΔPIA) were measured using anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. The values of these parameters were compared between the two groups. The levels of the SRS-Schwab classification modifiers were used to investigate the degree of sagittal malalignment. RESULTS: The RDC group showed significant lower LL, ΔLL and SS values, and significantly higher PT and ΔPIA values than the HOA group (P < 0.01). With regard to the sagittal modifiers in the SRS-Schwab classifications of the patients, the PI-LL and PT levels of the RDC group were significantly worse than those in the HOA group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that the static factors of a reduction in the lumbar lordotic angle and greater posterior pelvic tilt, the dynamic factors of small ΔLL values and large ΔPIA values and the complex interaction of these two types of factors, may play important roles in the development of RDC.

The relationship between spino-pelvic alignment and primary dysmenorrhea.

Introduction: Most women of reproductive age suffered from the primary dysmenorrhea (PD). Up to date, most studies on the etiology of dysmenorrhea focused on endocrine factors while ignored the effect of spino-pelvic bony anatomy on uterus. In this study, we innovatively shed light on the relationship between primary dysmenorrhea and sagittal spino-pelvic alignment. Materials and Methods: 120 patients diagnosed with primary dysmenorrhea and a control group of 118 healthy volunteers were enrolled into this study. All subjects received the standing full-length posteroanterior plain radiography to evaluate the sagittal spino-pelvic parameters. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess pain rating of primary dysmenorrhea patients. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Student's t test was performed to measure statistical significance between differences. Results: There was a significant difference in pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL) and thoracic kyphosis (TK) between PD group and Normal group (P<0.05). Furthermore, in PD group, the PI and SS was significant different between mild pain group and moderate pain group (P<0.05) and there was a significant negative correlation between pain rating and SS. From the perspective of sagittal spinal alignment, the majority of PD patients were classified with Roussouly type 2, meanwhile most normal people were classified with Roussouly type 3. Conclusion: Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment was related to primary dysmenorrhea symptoms. Lower SS and PI angles may contribute to a worsen pain in PD patients.

Factors Associated with Neck and Shoulder Pain in Volunteers.

INTRODUCTION: The aims of the present study were 1) to examine the association between neck and shoulder pain (NSP) and lifestyle in the general population and 2) to examine if sagittal spino-pelvic malalignment is more prevalent in NSP. METHODS: A total of 107 volunteers (mean age, 64.5 years) were recruited in this study from listings of resident registrations in Kihoku region, Wakayama, Japan. Feeling pain or stiffness in the neck or shoulders was defined as an NSP. The items studied were: 1) the existence or lack of NSP and their severity (using VAS scale), 2) Short Form-36 (SF-36), 3) Self-Rating Questionnaire for Depression (SRQ-D), 4) Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), 5) a detailed history consisting of 5 domains as being relevant to the psychosocial situation of patients with chronic pain, 6) A VAS of pain and numbness to the arm, and from thoracic region to legs. The radiographic parameters evaluated were also measured. Participants with a VAS score of 40 mm or higher and less were divided into 2 groups. Association of SF-36, SRQ-D, and PCS with NSP were assessed using multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: In terms of QoL, psychological assessment and a detailed history, bodily pain in SF-36, SRQ-D, and family stress were significantly associated with NSP. A VAS of pain and numbness to the arm, and from thoracic region to legs, was significantly associated with NSP. There were no statistical correlations between the VAS and radiographic parameters of the cervical spine. Among the whole spine sagittal measurements, multiple logistic regression analysis showed that sacral slope (SS) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were significantly associated with NSP. CONCLUSION: In this study, we showed the factors associated with NSP. Large SS and reduced SVA were significantly associated with NSP, while cervical spine measurements were not.

The Effects of Sagittal Spino-Pelvic Alignment on the Clinical Symptoms of Thoracolumbar Kyphosis in Osteoporotic Patients

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of sagittal spino-pelvic alignment on the clinical symptoms of thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK; T10-L2 Cobb's angle >20°) in osteoporotic patients. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Few studies have investigated the clinical symptoms and radiological features of TLK caused by degenerative changes. There is also controversy over whether clinical symptoms will deteriorate in patients with TLK or which treatment should be chosen according to the degree of TLK. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 2005 to May 2016, we reviewed 75 patients who were diagnosed with TLK (T10-L2 Cobb's angle >20°) and osteoporosis. Patients were excluded from the study if they had neurological symptoms, underlying spinal disorders, or unstable vertebral fractures. Fifty patients with TLK due to an osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (group F) and 25 patients with senile TLK (group S) were assessed by clinical symptoms and radiological parameters. Thoracolumbar kyphosis angle and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were also analyzed. Clinical symptoms were assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in clinical symptoms (VAS, ODI) and radiological parameters between groups F and S, or according to the degree of TLK(20°–30°, 30°–40°, >40°). Clinical symptoms were significantly more severe in patients with sagittal imbalance (SVA >5 cm) than in those with sagittal balance. CONCLUSIONS: Sagittal imbalance is a more important factor affecting clinical symptoms than the cause or the degree of TLK. Therefore, sagittal imbalance should be considered in the management of TLK in osteoporotic patients.