Management of neonates with 35 weeks of gestational age or more with infectious risk factors at birth: opportunities for improvement.

OBJECTIVES: The Northern California Kaiser-Permanente Neonatal Sepsis Risk Calculator (SRC) has proved to be safe and effective in reducing laboratory tests, hospital admissions, and administration of antibiotics to patients at risk of early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS). Many studies have focused on maternal chorioamnionitis as the principal risk factor for EONS. We wanted to know if the use of the SRC could be equally efficient in the context of several other infectious risk factors (IRF), in addition to chorioamnionitis, such as intrapartum maternal fever, GBS colonization and/or prolonged rupture of membranes (PROM). METHODS: Systematic study of neonates with ≥35 weeks gestational age (GA), born in our tertiary university hospital during a period of 18 months. Patients were retrospectively assessed with the SRC and its recommendations were compared with the actual management. A bivariate analysis of perinatal interventions, and outcomes was performed. RESULTS: A total of 5,885 newborns were born during the study period and 1783 mothers (31%) had at least one IRF. The incidence of culture-proven EONS was 0.5‰. The use of the SRC would have reduced laboratory evaluations (CBC and CRP) from 56.2 to 23.3%, and blood cultures, hospital admissions and antibiotic therapy from 22.9 to 15.5%, 17.8 and 7.6%, respectively. The management based on patients' symptoms would have shown a reduction to 7.5% in all the outcomes of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Both, the SRC and the management based on clinical findings, are safe and efficient to reduce the number of analytical studies, hospital admissions and administration of antibiotics to neonates with IRF.

Shivering in Febrile Children: Frequency and Usefulness in Predicting Serious Bacterial Infections - A Prospective Case-Control Study.

A prospective case-control study was conducted in a pediatric emergency department to describe the proportion of febrile children experiencing shivering and its clinical significance. Shivering was reported in 186 of 645 febrile children (28.8%). The rate of serious bacterial infection was similar in 86 children with shivering and 86 matched controls.

Using the Rochester criteria to evaluate infantile fever is more effective in males than females.

AIM: The reliability of low-risk and high-risk criteria in evaluating febrile infants aged up to 60 days has been well documented. The aim of this study was to evaluate gender differences in the reliability of these criteria in order to exclude serious bacterial infection (SBI) in febrile infants. METHODS: This study used the Rochester risk criteria, the study group was divided into low- or high-risk status for SBI, and the data were stratified by gender. SBI was defined as a urinary tract infection, bacteraemia, meningitis or bacterial enteritis. RESULTS: We enrolled 1896 infants (58.3% males), and SBIs were found in 10.6% of the males and 8% of the females (p = 0.21). The sensitivity of the risk criteria was 91.5% for the males and 73.4% (p < 0.05) for the females, and the positive likelihood ratio was 2.64 in the males versus 2.14 in the females (p < 0.001). A multivariable analysis showed that high-risk male patients were more than two times more likely to develop a bacterial infection than high-risk females. CONCLUSION: The Rochester risk criteria had a significantly higher sensitivity and positive likelihood ratio in males. Our findings suggest that clinicians should take gender into account when evaluating febrile infants.

Fever survey highlights significant variations in how infants aged ≤60 days are evaluated and underline the need for guidelines.

AIM: To assess the common practices for evaluating and treating febrile infants aged ≤60 days in a nationwide survey. METHODS: Questionnaires were administrated to inpatient paediatric departments in all 25 hospitals in Israel. RESULTS: Of the 25 centres surveyed (100% response rate), only 36% had written protocols concerning the approach to young febrile infants. The existence of a written protocol was significantly associated with the level of medical centre (tertiary versus primary and secondary, p = 0.041) and with the number of local paediatric infectious disease specialists (p = 0.034). In 13 (52%) hospitals, a normal white blood cell count was defined as 5000-15 000 cells/mL and 20 (80%) centres use C-reactive protein. Hospitalisation was mandatory in most (96%) centres for all neonates aged ≤28 days. Low-risk infants aged 29-60 days were hospitalised in 68.4% of the primary and secondary hospitals, compared with 33.3% tertiary centres. Ampicillin and gentamicin was the routine empiric antibiotic treatment for febrile infant in 92% of centres. CONCLUSION: Significant differences exist among centres in the evaluation of febrile infants aged ≤60 days exist. These differences reflect the lack of, and highlight the need for, national or international guidelines for the evaluation of fever in this age group.

Improved efficiency in the management of newborns with infectious risk factors by the sepsis risk calculator and clinical observation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficiency of the sepsis risk calculator and the serial clinical observation in the management of late preterm and term newborns with infectious risk factors. METHOD: Single-center, observational, two-phase cohort study comparing the rates of neonates born ≥35 weeks' gestation, ≥2000 g birthweight, and without major congenital anomalies, who were screened and/or received antibiotics for early-onset neonatal sepsis risk at our center during two periods, before (January/2018-June/2019) and after (July/2019-December/2020) the implementation of the sepsis risk calculator. RESULTS: A total of 1796 (Period 1) and 1867 (Period 2) patients with infectious risk factors were included. During the second period, tests to rule out sepsis were reduced by 34.0 % (RR, 95 %CI): 0.66 (0.61, 0.71), blood cultures by 13.1 %: 0.87 (0.77, 0.98), hospital admissions by 13.5 %: 0.86 (0.76, 0.98) and antibiotic administration by 45.9 %: 0.54 (0.47, 0.63). Three cases of early-onset neonatal sepsis occurred in the first period and two in the second. Clinical serial evaluation would have detected all true cases. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a sepsis risk calculator in the management of newborns ≥35 weeks GA, ≥2000 g birthweight, without major congenital anomalies, with infectious risk factors is safe and adequate to reduce laboratory tests, blood cultures, hospital admissions, and antibiotics administration. Serial clinical observation, in addition, could be instrumental to achieve or even improve this goal.

Severe and invasive bacterial infections in infants aged less than 90 days with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection.

BACKGROUND: Fever in children represents one of the most common causes of medical evaluation. Infants younger than 90 days of age are at higher risk of severe and invasive bacterial infections (SBI and IBI). However, clinical signs and symptoms of viral and bacterial infections in young infants are frequently similar, and several studies have shown that the risk of SBIs remains non-negligible even in the presence of a positive point-of-care viral test. Our study aims to evaluate whether the proportion of SBIs and IBIs in febrile infants younger than 90 days during the COVID-19 pandemic was higher than that in the pre-pandemic period, and to describe the proportion of SBIs and IBIs in infants with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center cohort study conducted at the Children's Hospital of the University of Padua in Italy, involving febrile young infants evaluated in the Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) and admitted to Pediatric Acute Care Unit (PACU) between March 2017 to December 2022. Infants admitted before the COVID-19 pandemic were compared to infants admitted during the pandemic period and SARS-CoV-2 positive patients to the negative ones. RESULTS: 442 febrile infants younger than 90 days were evaluated in Padua PED and admitted to the wards. The proportion of SBIs and IBIS did not significantly change over the study periods, ranging between 10.8% and 32.6% (p = 0.117) and between 0% and 7.6%, respectively (p = 0.367). The proportion of infants with a diagnosis of SBIs and IBIs was higher in the SARS-CoV-2 negative group (30.3% and 8.2%, respectively) compared to the positive group (8.5% and 2.8%, respectively) (p < 0.0001). The most common diagnosis in both groups was UTI, mainly caused by E. coli. A similar proportion of blood and urine cultures were performed, whereas lumbar puncture was more frequently performed in SARS-CoV-2 negative infants (40.2% vs 16.9%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the risk of concomitant serious bacterial infection with SARS-CoV-2 is low, it remains non-negligible. Therefore, even in SARS-CoV-2-positive febrile infants, we suggest that the approach to screening for SBIs remains cautious.

The risk of serious bacterial infections among young ex-premature infants with fever.

Background and Objectives: To determine the rate of serious-bacterial-infections (SBI) in young ex-premature infants with fever, and to develop a risk-stratification algorithm for these patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study including all infants who presented to the pediatric emergency department (ED) of a tertiary-care university-hospital between 2010 and 2020 with fever (≥38°C), were born prematurely (<37-weeks), had post-conception age of <52-weeks, and had available blood, urine, or CSF cultures. The rates of SBI by age-of-birth and age-at-visit were calculated and compared to a cohort of matched full-term controls. Results: The study included a total of 290 ex-premature cases and 290 full-term controls. There were 11 cases (3.8%) with an invasive bacterial infection (IBI) of either bacteremia, meningitis or both and only six controls (2.1%) with IBI (p = 0.32). Over 28-days chronologic-age, there were 10 (3.6%) IBIs among cases and no IBIs among the controls (p = 0.02). There were eight (3%) cases and three (1%) controls with IBI who were well-appearing on physical examination (p = 0.19). All eight well-appearing ex-premature infants were under 60-days adjusted-age, seven of whom (88%) were also under 28-days adjusted-age. There were 28 (10.6%) cases and 34 (12%) controls with urinary tract infection (UTI) (p = 0.5). Among cases under 60-days adjusted-age, urinalysis was not reliable to exclude UTI (50% negative). Conclusions: Well-appearing ex-preterm infants have a significant risk for IBI until the adjusted age of 28-days and for UTI until the adjusted age of 60-days. Further studies are needed to evaluate the approach to fever in this unique population.

Infants Younger Than 90 Days Admitted for Late-Onset Sepsis Display a Reduced Abundance of Regulatory T Cells.

Objective: To provide epidemiological data of infants < 90 days of age with suspected late-onset sepsis (LOS) and evaluate distinct immunological specificities. We hypothesized that previously healthy infants < 3 months of age with sepsis have a yet undefined immunological predisposition; e.g. differences in lymphocyte subsets including regulatory T cells. Methods: We performed an exploratory, single center study between January 1st, 2019 and June 1st, 2021. Routine diagnostics included conventional culture (blood, cerebrospinal fluid, urine), PCR and inflammatory markers in infants < 90 days of age with suspected sepsis. We additionally analyzed lymphocyte subsets and CD4+ CD25+ forkhead box protein (FoxP3)+ Tregs at admission for sepsis workup as compared to age-matched controls. Results: A convenience sample cohort of n= 51 infants with sepsis workup was enrolled. Invasive bacterial infection (IBI) was diagnosed in 25 (49.0%) patients including two infants with a rhinovirus co-infection and viral infection in 14 (27.5%) neonates. No infectious cause was found in 12 cases. Infants with suspected LOS displayed a decreased abundance of CD4+ FoxP3+ T cells as compared to controls, which was most pronounced in the subgroup of infants with IBI. We also noticed elevated HLA-DR-positive CD3+ cells in infants with LOS and a higher CD4/CD8-ratio in infants with viral infection as compared to healthy controls. Infants with viral infections had a higher number of natural killer cells as compared to infants with IBI. Conclusion: Our exploratory data support the concept of a potential immaturity state and failed immune tolerance development for young infants with LOS. Future large-scale studies are needed to elucidate pre-sepsis conditions and to target the microbiome-immunity interplay as a potential risk pattern.

Implementation of an antibiotic stewardship quality improvement initiative in a community hospital for infants born at ≥35 weeks.

We present our experience in the implementation of an antibiotic stewardship quality improvement initiative directed toward infants born at ≥35 weeks using as a primary tool the Kaiser Permanente early onset sepsis calculator (KP-EOS-C) at the Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Frisco. After the approval and support of the medical staff and administration, we proceeded to launch an extensive educational program for all women's services nursing staff on how to utilize this calculator to communicate results to the pediatricians on staff. After implementation, we saw a 54% reduction in the number of infants undergoing sepsis workup evaluations and a 51% reduction in the number of infants receiving antibiotics (P < 0.001). We conclude that the implementation of this type of initiative may be feasible and worthwhile in other similar community hospitals, provided there is buy-in by physicians and administration as well as an extensive educational program to the hospital medical and nursing staff.

Improved efficiency in the management of newborns with infectious risk factors by the sepsis risk calculator and clinical observation

Abstract Objective To evaluate the efficiency of the sepsis risk calculator and the serial clinical observation in the management of late preterm and term newborns with infectious risk factors. Method Single-center, observational, two-phase cohort study comparing the rates of neonates born ≥35 weeks' gestation, ≥2000 g birthweight, and without major congenital anomalies, who were screened and/or received antibiotics for early-onset neonatal sepsis risk at our center during two periods, before (January/2018-June/2019) and after (July/2019-December/2020) the implementation of the sepsis risk calculator. Results A total of 1796 (Period 1) and 1867 (Period 2) patients with infectious risk factors were included. During the second period, tests to rule out sepsis were reduced by 34.0 % (RR, 95 %CI): 0.66 (0.61, 0.71), blood cultures by 13.1 %: 0.87 (0.77, 0.98), hospital admissions by 13.5 %: 0.86 (0.76, 0.98) and antibiotic administration by 45.9 %: 0.54 (0.47, 0.63). Three cases of early-onset neonatal sepsis occurred in the first period and two in the second. Clinical serial evaluation would have detected all true cases. Conclusions The implementation of a sepsis risk calculator in the management of newborns ≥35 weeks GA, ≥2000 g birthweight, without major congenital anomalies, with infectious risk factors is safe and adequate to reduce laboratory tests, blood cultures, hospital admissions, and antibiotics administration. Serial clinical observation, in addition, could be instrumental to achieve or even improve this goal.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Fever Without Source or Unknown Origin-Child.

The cause of fever in a child can often be determined from history, physical examination, and laboratory tests; infections account for the majority of cases. Yet in 20%, no apparent cause can be found, designated as fever without source (FWS). The yield of chest radiography in children with FWS is low, and it is usually not appropriate. However, in children with respiratory signs, high fever (>39°C), or marked leukocytosis (≥20,000/mm(3)), chest radiography is usually appropriate, as it has a higher yield in detecting clinically occult pneumonia. In newborns with FWS, there is higher risk for serious bacterial infection, and the routine use of chest radiography is controversial. In children with neutropenia, fever is a major concern. In some clinical circumstances, such as after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, chest CT scan may be appropriate even if the results of chest radiography are negative or nonspecific, as it has higher sensitivity and can demonstrate specific findings (such as lung nodule and "halo sign") that can guide management. In a child with prolonged fever of unknown origin despite extensive medical workup (fever of unknown origin), diagnosis is usually dependent on clinical and laboratory studies, and imaging tests have low yield. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.