Age, Sperm Retrieval, and Testicular Histology in Klinefelter Syndrome.

PURPOSE: We sought to examine sperm retrieval and testicular histology in males of different ages with Klinefelter syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all males with Klinefelter syndrome who underwent microdissection testicular sperm extraction at our institution from 1995 to 2020. Patients were divided into adolescent (<20 years) and adult (≥20 years) cohorts. Histology and sperm retrieval were compared using chi-square statistics. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with successful sperm retrieval. RESULTS: We identified 217 males with Klinefelter syndrome, of whom 59 were adolescents and 158 were adults. Adults were stratified into 10-year groupings (20-29 years, n = 62; 30-39 years, n = 88; ≥40 years, n = 8). Approximately 17% of adolescents had testis histology containing germ cells compared with 15% of the 20 to 29-year cohort, 14% of the 30 to 39-year cohort, and 0% over 40 years. In comparison to adolescents (53%), the sperm retrieval rate was significantly higher in the 20 to 29-year cohort (71%, P = .04) and lower in the ≥40-year cohort (13%, P = .03). In multivariable analysis, the presence of hypospermatogenesis on testis biopsy (OR 5.8, P = .03) was associated with higher odds of successful sperm retrieval. CONCLUSIONS: Younger males more frequently had germ cell-containing testis histology, however this finding was not associated with a higher odds of sperm retrieval. Reproductive urologists should counsel azoospermic males with Klinefelter syndrome that sperm retrieval during adolescence for fertility preservation is not required and can be performed in young adulthood.

Association between embryo morphokinetic development and intracytoplasmic sperm injection with epididymal sperm via time-lapse imaging.

The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of sperm source on embryo morphokinetics and the clinical outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles by considering the clustering of data (multiple embryos per patient that share a comparable developmental timing). This matched cohort study was performed at a private university-affiliated in vitro fertilization center. Women who underwent ICSI with epididymal sperm between January 2019 and December 2020 (the percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration group, n = 32 cycles) were matched with women who underwent ICSI with ejaculated sperm because of idiopathic male factor infertility (the male factor infertility [MFI] group, n = 32 cycles) or female infertility (the control group, n = 32 cycles). Embryos were cultured in a time-lapse imaging incubator, and morphokinetic development was recorded and compared among the groups. Significantly slower divisions were observed in embryos derived from epididymal sperm than in those derived from the MFI and control groups. Embryos derived from epididymal sperm had a significantly lower KIDScore (3.1 ± 0.2) than did those derived from ejaculated spermatozoa from the MFI (5.4 ± 0.1) and control (5.6 ± 0.2, p < 0.001) groups. Epididymal sperm-derived embryos showed a significantly greater occurrence of multinucleation (23.2%) than did those derived from ejaculated sperm from the MFI and control groups (2.8% and 3.7%, p < 0.001, respectively). Epididymal sperm-derived embryos were significantly more likely to undergo direct or reverse cleavage (11.1%) than ejaculated sperm-derived embryos in the control group (4.3%, p = 0.001). In conclusion, delayed cell cleavage and increased incidences of blastomere multinucleation and abnormal cleavage patterns are observed when epididymal-derived sperm are used for ICSI.

Interpretable machine learning models for predicting clinical pregnancies associated with surgical sperm retrieval from testes of different etiologies: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between surgical sperm retrieval of different etiologies and clinical pregnancy is unclear. We aimed to develop a robust and interpretable machine learning (ML) model for predicting clinical pregnancy using the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) association of surgical sperm retrieval from testes of different etiologies. METHODS: A total of 345 infertile couples who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment with surgical sperm retrieval due to different etiologies from February 2020 to March 2023 at the reproductive center were retrospectively analyzed. The six machine learning (ML) models were used to predict the clinical pregnancy of ICSI. After evaluating the performance characteristics of the six ML models, the Extreme Gradient Boosting model (XGBoost) was selected as the best model, and SHAP was utilized to interpret the XGBoost model for predicting clinical pregnancies and to reveal the decision-making process of the model. RESULTS: Combining the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, brier score, and the area under the precision-recall (P-R) curve (AP), the XGBoost model has the best performance (AUROC: 0.858, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.778-0.936, accuracy: 79.71%, brier score: 0.151). The global summary plot of SHAP values shows that the female age is the most important feature influencing the model output. The SHAP plot showed that younger age in females, bigger testicular volume (TV), non-tobacco use, higher anti-müllerian hormone (AMH), lower follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in females, lower FSH in males, the temporary ejaculatory disorders (TED) group, and not the non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) group all resulted in an increased probability of clinical pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The XGBoost model predicts clinical pregnancies associated with testicular sperm retrieval of different etiologies with high accuracy, reliability, and robustness. It can provide clinical counseling decisions for patients with surgical sperm retrieval of various etiologies.

Successful pregnancy and delivery following microdissection testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection for non-obstructive azoospermia after microsurgical varicocelectomy: A case report and review of the literature.

Although surgical varicocele treatment is generally considered to result in improved reproductive outcomes, we encountered a rare case of postoperative azoospermia in an infertile male patient who underwent microsurgical varicocelectomy for a palpable left-sided varicocele with concomitant cryptozoospermia. More than 1 year after varicocelectomy, the patient still had not recovered from azoospermia. Thereafter, he underwent microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE), allowing him and his partner to obtain one good quality blastocyst via intracytoplasmic sperm injection following oocyte retrievals. Finally, the couple had a successful pregnancy following a frozen embryo transfer, and a live male infant was subsequently delivered to them at 39 weeks and 5 days. In cases of severe testicular dysfunction, varicocelectomy may worsen the postoperative semen parameters until azoospermia. Therefore, it is important to consider preoperative sperm cryopreservation and to explore the possibility of subsequent TESE.

Genetic profiling of azoospermic men to identify the etiology and predict reproductive potential.

PURPOSE: To identify germline mutations related to azoospermia etiology and reproductive potential of surgically retrieved spermatozoa, and to investigate the feasibility of predicting seminiferous tubule function of nonobstructive azoospermic men by transcriptomic profiling of ejaculates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sperm specimens were obtained from 30 men (38.4 ± 6 years) undergoing epididymal sperm aspiration for obstructive azoospermia (OA, n = 19) acquired by vasectomy, or testicular biopsy for nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA, n = 11). To evaluate for a correlation with azoospermia etiology, DNAseq was performed on surgically retrieved spermatozoa, and cell-free RNAseq on seminal fluid (n = 23) was performed to predict spermatogenesis in the seminiferous tubule. RESULTS: Overall, surgically retrieved sperm aneuploidy rates were 1.7% and 1.8% among OA and NOA cohorts, respectively. OA men carried housekeeping-related gene mutations, while NOA men displayed mutations on genes involved in crucial spermiogenic functions (AP1S2, AP1G2, APOE). We categorized couples within each cohort according to ICSI clinical outcomes to investigate genetic causes that may affect reproductive potential. All OA-fertile men (n = 9) carried mutations in ZNF749 (sperm production), whereas OA-infertile men (n = 10) harbored mutations in PRB1, which is essential for DNA replication. NOA-fertile men (n = 8) carried mutations in MPIG6B (stem cell lineage differentiation), whereas NOA-infertile individuals (n = 3) harbored mutations in genes involved in spermato/spermio-genesis (ADAM29, SPATA31E1, MAK, POLG, IFT43, ATG9B) and early embryonic development (MBD5, CCAR1, PMEPA1, POLK, REC8, REPIN1, MAPRE3, ARL4C). Transcriptomic assessment of cell-free RNAs in seminal fluid from NOA men allowed the prediction of residual spermatogenic foci. CONCLUSIONS: Sperm genome profiling provides invaluable information on azoospermia etiology and identifies gene-related mechanistic links to reproductive performance. Moreover, RNAseq assessment of seminal fluid from NOA men can help predict sperm retrieval during testicular biopsies.

Micromapping testicular sperm extraction: A new technique for microscopic testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia.

Purpose: In microscopic testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) for nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA), sperm can be recovered relatively easily in some cases, and mTESE may be retrospectively considered excessive. However, mTESE is routinely performed in the majority of NOA patients because of the difficulty in predicting tissue status. A minimally invasive and comprehensive sperm retrieval method that allows on-the-spot tissue assessment is needed. We have developed and evaluated a novel sperm retrieval technique for NOA called micromapping testicular sperm extraction (MMTSE). Methods: MMTSE involves dividing the testis into four sections and making multiple small needle holes in the tunica albuginea to extract seminiferous tubules and retrieve sperm. The sperm-positive group by MMTSE (Group I) underwent additional tissue collection (ATC) via a small incision, whereas the sperm-negative group by MMTSE (Group 0) underwent mTESE. Results: In total, 40 NOA participants underwent MMTSE. Group I included 15 patients and Group 0 included 25 patients. In Group 1, sperm were recovered from all patients by ATC. In Group 0, sperm were recovered in 4 of 25 cases using mTESE. Conclusions: MMTSE shows promise as a simple method that comprehensively searches testicular tissue and retrieves sperm using an appropriate method while minimizing patient burden.

Anti-Müllerian hormone predicts positive sperm retrieval in men with idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia-findings from a multi-centric cross-sectional study.

STUDY QUESTION: Is it possible to identify a reliable marker of successful sperm retrieval (+SR) in men with idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia (iNOA) undergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE)? SUMMARY ANSWER: A higher likelihood of +SR during mTESE is observed in men with iNOA and lower preoperative serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, with good predictive accuracy achieved using an AMH threshold of <4 ng/ml. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: AMH has been previously linked to +SR in men with iNOA undergoing mTESE prior to ART. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A multi-centre cross-sectional study was carried out with a cohort of 117 men with iNOA undergoing mTESE at three tertiary-referral centres. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Data from 117 consecutive white-European men with iNOA presenting for primary couple's infertility associated with a pure male factor at three centres were analysed. Descriptive statistics was applied to compare patients with negative (-SR) versus +SR at mTESE. Multivariate logistic regression models were fitted to predict +SR at mTESE, after adjusting for possible confounders. Diagnostic accuracy of the factors associated with +SR was assessed. Decision curve analyses were used to display the clinical benefit. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Overall, 60 (51.3%) men had an -SR and 57 (48.7%) had a +SR at mTESE. Patients with +SR had lower levels of baseline AMH (P = 0.005) and higher levels of estradiol (E2) (P = 0.01). At multivariate logistic regression analysis, lower levels of AMH (odds ratio: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.64-0.93, P = 0.03) were associated with +SR at mTESE, after adjusting for possible confounders (e.g. age, mean testicular volume, FSH, and E2). A threshold of AMH <4 ng/ml achieved the highest accuracy for +SR at mTESE, with an AUC of 70.3% (95% CI: 59.8-80.7). Decision curve analysis displayed the net clinical benefit of using an AMH <4 ng/ml threshold. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: There is a need for external validation in even larger cohorts, across different centres and ethnicities. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis to provide high level of evidence are lacking in the context of AMH and SR rates in men with iNOA. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Current findings suggest that slightly more than one in two men with iNOA had -SR at mTESE. Overall, men with iNOA with lower levels of AMH had a significantly higher percentage of successful SR at surgery. A threshold of <4 ng/ml for circulating AMH ensured satisfactory sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values in the context of +SR at mTESE. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by voluntary donations from the Urological Research Institute (URI). All authors declare no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Sperm retrieval rate and patient factors in azoospermia factor c microdeletion azoospermia: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To reveal the overall sperm retrieval rate (SRR) and range in patients with azoospermia factor c (AZFc) microdeletion azoospermia by microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) and discuss the differences of preoperative patient factors among studies with various SRRs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Embase until February 2023. All studies reporting SRRs by mTESE and required parameters of patients with AZFc microdeletions were included. The primary outcome was the SRR and, if available, the pregnancy rate (PR) and live-birth rate (LBR) after intracytoplasmic sperm injection were also investigated as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Eventually 11 cohort studies were included in this review. A total number of 441 patients underwent mTESE and in 275 of them sperm was obtained, reaching an overall SRR of 62.4%. The SRRs among studies had a wide range from 25.0% to 85.7%. The studies reporting higher SRRs generally had older mean ages, and higher follicle-stimulating hormone and testosterone levels. Only four studies provided practical data on pregnancies and live-born children of patients with AZFc microdeletions, so the overall PR and LBR were unavailable. CONCLUSIONS: The overall SRR of patients with AZFc microdeletion azoospermia was 62.4%. The effect of patient factors in SR needs further evidence in future work.

Live motile sperm sorting device for enhanced sperm-fertilization competency: comparative analysis with density-gradient centrifugation and microfluidic sperm sorting.

PURPOSE: A live motile sperm sorting device (LensHooke® CA0) developed to prevent the deleterious effects of centrifugation was evaluated comparatively with conventional density-gradient centrifugation (DGC) and microfluidic-based device (Zymot) in sperm selection. METHODS: Semen samples from 239 men were collected. CA0 under different incubation intervals (5, 10, 30, and 60 min) and temperatures (20, 25, and 37℃) was conducted. The sperm quality in CA0-, DGC-, and Zymot-processed samples was then comparatively evaluated. Semen parameters included concentration, motility, morphology, motion kinematics, DNA fragmentation index (DFI), and the rate of acrosome-reacted sperm (AR). RESULTS: Total motility and motile sperm concentration increased in a time- and temperature-dependent manner and the total motility peaked for 30 min at 37℃. In paired analysis, CA0 showed significantly higher total motility (94.0%), progressive motility (90.8%), rapid progressive motility (83.6%), normal morphology (10.3%), and lower DFI (2.4%) and AR (4.7%) than the other two methods in normozoospermic samples (all p < 0.05). For non-normozoospermic samples, CA0 had significantly better results than the other two methods (total motility 89.2%, progressive motility 80.4%, rapid progressive motility 74.2%, normal morphology 8.5%, DFI 4.0%, and AR 4.0%; all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: CA0 yielded spermatozoa with enhanced sperm fertilization potentials; DFI was minimized in samples processed by CA0. CA0 was effective for both normal and abnormal semen samples due to its consistent selection efficiency.

Testicular fine-needle aspiration in infertile men with absolute non-obstructive azoospermia: A single-centre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The methodology of surgically extracted sperm cells in fertility treatments remains debated, mainly due to the lack of data evaluating its predictive value on treatment outcomes. AIM: To gain insight into the effectiveness of testicular fine-needle aspiration (TEFNA) in a cohort of infertile men with absolute non-obstructive azoospermia and to examine whether the number of retrieved sperm cells affects the fertilisation rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 89 infertile men, aged 26-47, meticulously diagnosed with non-obstructive azoospermia, participated in the study. All participants underwent TEFNA. The primary outcome measure was the TEFNA success rate in retrieving mature sperm. The secondary outcome measures included fertilisation rate, clinical pregnancy rates, and live births associated with the retrieved sperm. RESULTS: Sperm cells were successfully retrieved from 40 out of 89 patients (45%) with no significant postoperative complications. Retrieval of up to ten sperm cells occurred in 11 procedures (25%); ten procedures (22.7%) resulted in producing dozens of sperm cells, and 100s to 1000s of sperm cells were obtained from the remainder of 23 procedures (52.3%). Patients whose TEFNA resulted in only a few sperm cells had a much lower fertilisation rate (16.6%) than the other two groups (40.1% and 47.2%, respectively, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The utilisation of TEFNA for sperm extraction in men with non-obstructive azoospermia is a simple, fast-learning, effective, and safe treatment option. In cases where sperm retrieval was successful, the fertilisation rate was strongly related to the number of sperm cells obtained.

Cryptozoospermia: Should we use ejaculated sperm or surgically retrieved sperm for assisted reproductive technology?

Purpose: In cryptozoospermic subjects, it may often may be difficult to secure motile sperm for assisted reproductive technology (ART). We examined the results of ART with frozen thawed ejaculated sperm in cryptozoospermic subjects and evaluated whether sperm retrieval surgery is necessary for such patients in our clinic. Methods: Between 2013 and 2021, we evaluated 197 cryptozoospermic patients. Age, endocrine panel at the time of the initial semen analysis, and anti-müllerian hormone levels at the time of the spouse's first egg retrieval were examined. Cryopreservation of ejaculated motile sperm collected essentially weekly over a 3-month period was carried out. ART data recorded was the number of egg retrieval cycles, normal fertilization rate, and clinical pregnancy rate. Results: ART using frozen sperm as well as sperm ejaculated on the day of egg retrieval was possible in all cases. The normal fertilization rate was 70.4%, the clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transferred was achieved in 31.5% (870 cycles), and the live birth rate per case was 73.8%. Conclusions: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was possible without sperm retrieval surgery in cryptozoospermia, resulting in 73.8% of live births per patient. Sperm identification, sperm processing, and ICSI technique are especially important in cryptozoospermia. Sperm retrieval surgery can be avoided in cryptozoospermic patients.

From Diagnosis to Treatment: Comprehensive Care by Reproductive Urologists in Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Infertility is a global health concern, with male factors playing an especially large role. Unfortunately, however, the contributions made by reproductive urologists in managing male infertility under assisted reproductive technology (ART) often go undervalued. This narrative review highlights the important role played by reproductive urologists in diagnosing and treating male infertility as well as any barriers they face when providing services. This manuscript presents a comprehensive review of reproductive urologists' role in managing male infertility, outlining their expertise in diagnosing and managing male infertility as well as reversible causes and performing surgical techniques such as sperm retrieval. This manuscript investigates the barriers limiting urologist involvement such as limited availability, awareness among healthcare professionals, and financial constraints. This study highlights a decrease in male fertility due to lifestyle factors like sedentary behavior, obesity, and substance abuse. It stresses the significance of conducting an evaluation process involving both male and female partners to identify any underlying factors contributing to infertility and to identify patients who do not require any interventions beyond ART. We conclude that engaging urologists more effectively in infertility management is key to optimizing fertility outcomes among couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatments and requires greater education among healthcare providers regarding the role urologists and lifestyle factors that could have an effect on male fertility.

Effects of Chemo- and Radiation Therapy on Microsurgical Testicular Sperm Extraction for Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia.

PURPOSE: Men who survive cancer as children or young adults may have severe spermatogenic impairment with azoospermia requiring surgical sperm retrieval and assisted reproductive technologies. We assessed treatment outcomes from a large series of cancer patients with prior radiation and/or chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men with nonobstructive azoospermia who underwent initial microsurgical testicular sperm extraction from 1995-2020 from a high-volume surgeon at a single institution were identified. Those with a history of malignancy treated by radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy were included. The primary outcome was successful sperm retrieval. RESULTS: A total of 106 men were evaluated, of whom 57 received chemotherapy and radiation, 44 received only chemotherapy and 5 received only radiation. Sperm retrieval was successful in 39 of 106 (37%) men, with higher likelihood of retrieval in men who received only chemotherapy compared to men who received chemotherapy and radiation (61% vs 18%, p <0.001). None of the 18 patients who received chemotherapy with radiation to the pelvis had successful sperm retrieval, compared to 26% of patients who received chemotherapy with extra-pelvic radiation (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy and radiation for cancer may result in nonobstructive azoospermia that can be treated to allow fertility. However, pelvic radiation therapy is associated with the worst prognosis for successful treatment with microsurgical sperm retrieval and in vitro fertilization; we observed no cases of successful retrieval in men who received pelvic radiation therapy. These data are useful for pretreatment counseling, suggesting that men with prior radiation therapy may not be candidates for surgical sperm retrieval.

Delaying testicular sperm extraction in 47,XXY Klinefelter patients does not impair the sperm retrieval rate, and AMH levels are higher when TESE is positive.

STUDY QUESTION: Should testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in non-mosaic 47,XXY Klinefelter syndrome (KS) patients be performed soon after puberty or could it be delayed until adulthood? SUMMARY ANSWER: The difference in sperm retrieval rate (SRR) in TESE was not significant between the 'Young' (15-22 years old) cohort and the 'Adult' (23-43 years old) cohort of non-mosaic KS patients recruited prospectively in parallel. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Several studies have tried to define predictive factors for TESE outcome in non-mosaic KS patients, with very heterogeneous results. Some authors have found that age was a pejorative factor and recommended performing TESE soon after puberty. To date, no predictive factors have been unanimously recognized to guide clinicians in deciding to perform TESE in azoospermic KS patients. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Two cohorts (Young: 15-22 years old; Adult: 23-43 years old) were included prospectively in parallel. A total of 157 non-mosaic 47,XXY KS patients were included between 2010 and 2020 in the reproductive medicine department of the University Hospital of Lyon, France. However 31 patients gave up before TESE, four had cryptozoospermia and three did not have a valid hormone assessment; these were excluded from this study. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Data for 119 patients (61 Young and 58 Adult) were analyzed. All of these patients had clinical, hormonal and seminal evaluation before conventional TESE (c-TESE). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The global SRR was 45.4%. SRRs were not significantly different between the two age groups: Young SRR=49.2%, Adult SRR = 41.4%; P = 0.393. Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and inhibin B were significantly higher in the Young group (AMH: P = 0.001, Inhibin B: P < 0.001), and also higher in patients with a positive TESE than in those with a negative TESE (AMH: P = 0.001, Inhibin B: P = 0.036). The other factors did not differ between age groups or according to TESE outcome. AMH had a better predictive value than inhibin B. SRRs were significantly higher in the upper quartile of AMH plasma levels than in the lower quartile (or in cases with AMH plasma level below the quantification limit): 67.7% versus 28.9% in the whole population (P = 0.001), 60% versus 20% in the Young group (P = 0.025) and 71.4% versus 33.3% in the Adult group (P = 0.018). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: c-TESE was performed in the whole study; we cannot rule out the possibility of different results if microsurgical TESE had been performed. Because of the limited sensitivity of inhibin B and AMH assays, a large number of patients had values lower than the quantification limits, preventing the definition a threshold below which negative TESE can be predicted. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: In contrast to some studies, age did not appear as a pejorative factor when comparing patients 15-22 and 23-44 years of age. Improved accuracy of inhibin B and AMH assays in the future might still allow discrimination of patients with persistent foci of spermatogenesis and guide clinician decision-making and patient information. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study was supported by a grant from the French Ministry of Health D50621 (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinical Régional 2008). The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01918280.

Gonadotropins treatment prior to microdissection testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia: a single-center cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in combination with ICSI can make paternity possible for non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients. Testicular sperm can be successfully retrieved in nearly half of NOA patients. Nevertheless, not many convincing protocols are established to improve sperm retrieval rate (SRR). The goal of this study was to evaluate whether gonadotropins therapy before micro-TESE could improve sperm retrieval rate and affect the ICSI outcomes in non-obstructive azoospermia patients with hypergonadotropic hypogonadism. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included a total of 569 non-obstructive azoospermia men who underwent micro-TESE with or without 3-month of preoperative hCG / hCG plus highly purified urinary FSH (uFSH) between January 2016 and December 2019. The primary outcome was the sperm retrieval rate of micro-TESE. RESULTS: Sperm was found in 27 patients among 395 NOA men who accepted preoperative gonadotropins treatment (6.8%, 27/395) in post-treatment semen analysis for ICSI. One hundred forty nine out of 542 patients could successfully obtain enough sperm for ICSI through the micro-TESE (overall SRR = 27.5%). There was a statistically significant difference in the SRR between the preoperative gonadotropins treatment and non-gonadotropins treatment groups (31.2%, 115/368 vs. 19.5%, 34/174, P = 0.006). In the multivariable analysis with IPTW according to the propensity score, there was a significant association between preoperative gonadotropins treatment and the SRR (OR, 1.59; 95% CI: 1.02-2.52; P = 0.042). No differences in the clinical pregnancy rate, live birth delivery rate, or miscarriage rate were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Preoperative gonadotropins therapy seems to have a role in improving SRR in NOA patients with hypergonadotropic hypogonadism. We found that gonadotropins therapy had no effect on ICSI clinical outcomes and live birth.

The importance of the urologist in male oncology fertility preservation.

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate that surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) and spermatogonial stem cell retrieval (SSCR) in an oncological context are safe and successful. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This a retrospective study in a tertiary hospital in the UK. Patients requiring fertility preservation from December 2017 to January 2020 were included. Data were analysed with Microsoft Excel 2016 and the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 20). RESULTS: Among 1264 patients referred to the Reproductive Medical Unit at the University College of London Hospitals for cryopreservation prior to gonadotoxic treatment, 39 chose to go forward with SSR/SSCR because they presented as azoo-/cryptozoospermic or an inability to masturbate/ejaculate. Interventions were testicular sperm extraction (23 patients) or aspiration (one), electroejaculation (one), and testicular wedge biopsy for SSCR (14). The median (range) age was 15.0 (10-65) years and the median testosterone level was 4.4 nmoL/L. Primary diagnoses were sarcoma in 11 patients, leukaemia in nine, lymphoma in eight, testicular tumour in five, other oncological haematological entities in two, other solid cancers in two, while two patients had non-oncological haematological diseases. SSR/SSCR could be offered within 7.5 days on average. Chemotherapy could follow within 2 days from SSR/SSCR, and bone marrow transplant occurred within 19.5 days (all expressed as medians). The success rate for SSR was 68.0% (at least one vial/straw collected). The mean (SD) Johnsen score of testicular biopsies was 5.23 (2.25) with a trend towards positive correlation with SSR success (P = 0.07). However, age, hormonal profile and type of cancer did not predict SSR outcome. CONCLUSION: We show that SSR and SSCR in an oncological context are valid treatment options with a high success rate for patients in which sperm cryopreservation from semen is impossible. By providing an effective pathway, fertility preservation is possible with minimal delay to oncological treatment.

Volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis of the testes in nonobstructive azoospermia: a noninvasive fingerprint of impaired spermatogenesis?

OBJECTIVES: To explore the association between testicular volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis metrics and histologic categories in nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). The role of ADC histogram analysis in predicting the presence of spermatozoa, prior to testicular sperm extraction (TESE), was also investigated. METHODS: Forty-one NOA men and 17 age-matched controls underwent scrotal MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging. Histogram analysis of ADC data of the whole testis was performed. Metrics including mean, standard deviation, median, mode, 25th percentile, 75th percentile, skewness, kurtosis, and entropy of volumetric ADC histograms were calculated. Nonparametric statistical tests were used to assess differences in ADC histogram parameters between NOA histologic categories (hypospermatogenesis, severe hypospermatogenesis, early maturation arrest, and Sertoli cell-only syndrome) and normal testes and, between NOA with positive and negative sperm retrieval. RESULTS: Normal testes had a lower mean, median, mode, 25th percentile (p < 0.001), and 75th percentile of ADC (p = 0.001), compared to NOA histologic phenotypes. NOA with hypospermatogenesis had a lower 25th percentile of ADC compared to NOA with severe hypospermatogenesis. Regression analysis revealed that the 25th percentile of ADC had a moderately negative correlation with NOA histologic phenotype. The median ADC proved the most significant metric (p = 0.007) to predict the presence of sperm. CONCLUSIONS: Testicular volumetric ADC histogram parameters may contribute in the identification of the subpopulation of NOA men with a specific type of spermatogenic arrest. KEY POINTS: • Volumetric ADC histogram analysis metrics may be used as noninvasive markers of impaired spermatogenesis in nonobstructive azoospermia. • The 25th percentile of ADC proved useful in discriminating between NOA testes with hypospermatogenesis and severe hypospermatogenesis. • The median ADC proved the most significant parameter to predict the presence of viable spermatozoa prior to TESE.

Does testicular sperm retrieval adversely impact spermatogenesis over the long-term?

Testicular sperm retrieval (TSR) techniques are valuable in the context of severe idiopathic male factor infertility; however, there are few studies in the literature examining the long-term impact of TSR on testicular function. The objective was to determine whether testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) or microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) worsens the pre-existing spermatogenesis deficiency in men with either cryptozoospermia or severe oligozoospermia. The study population consisted of 145 men with either cryptozoospermia or severe oligozoospermia that underwent TESA or micro-TESE and had long-term post-operative semen analyses (SA). Patients with SA prior to and following TSR were included (n = 24). Amongst them, 16 men underwent TESA and 8 underwent micro-TESE. The follow-up SA was obtained at a mean of 3.0 ± 2.0 years following TSR (range: 0.3-8.3 years) amongst all participants. The post-operative semen parameters in the TESA group were similar to the pre-intervention parameters (p > 0.1). Similarly, the micro-TESE cohort did not demonstrate significant alterations in semen parameters post-intervention (p > 0.05). None of the men in the study became azoospermic following the TSR. Our study indicates TESA or micro-TESE do not appear to worsen the pre-existing spermatogenesis deficiencies in cryptozoospermic and oligozoospermic men over a long-term period. Larger studies are required to corroborate these findings.

Preoperative testosterone and follicle stimulating hormone levels are important predictors for sperm retrieval by microdissection testicular sperm extraction in non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome.

This study aimed to assess outcomes of microdissection testicular sperm extraction (MD-TESE) and identify predictors for sperm retrieval (SR) in patients with non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome (NM-KFS). We retrospectively evaluated 37 patients with NM-KFS who underwent MD-TESE. Data of age at operation, body mass index (BMI), testicular volume, serum luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), preoperative and postoperative testosterone levels with reduction ratio between the two values, and FSH/preoperative testosterone ratio were analysed. These patients were divided into two groups according to success or failure of SR: the successful and failure groups. Factors related to SR were evaluated by statistical analyses using the Mann-Whitney U test and logistic regression modelling. Regarding these factors, the cut-off level was specified using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Moreover, the percentage of SR at that level was assessed. A simple scoring model was developed based on the multivariate analysis. Fourteen patients underwent successful SR, whereas 23 experienced failure SR. Statistical analysis found preoperative testosterone and FSH levels to be significant factors associated with SR. On the ROC curve, the cut-off levels for preoperative testosterone and FSH were 2.34 ng/ml and 33.2 mIU/ml respectively. A new scoring model was developed, consisting of preoperative testosterone (≥2.34 ng/ml) and FSH (≤33.2 mIU/ml). The sperm retrieval rates (SRRs) were clearly discriminated by stratification according to the scoring model. The SRR of the cases of scores of 2, 1 and 0 were 87.5%, 31.6% and 10% respectively. At our hospital, the SRR of MD-TESE in patients with NM-KFS was 37.8%. The patients with high testosterone and low FSH levels tended to demonstrate successful SR.

A systemic review and meta-analysis exploring the predictors of sperm retrieval in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia and chromosomal abnormalities.

To identify the most prevalent chromosomal abnormalities in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), consolidate their surgical sperm retrieval (SSR) rates and determine the significant predictors of positive SSR in this patient population. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Fifty-three studies including 2965 patients were identified through searching the PubMed database. Klinefelter Syndrome (KS) was the most prevalent chromosomal abnormality reported in 2239 cases (75.5%). Azoospermia factor c (AZFc) microdeletions were the second most common (18.6%), but men with these deletions had higher SSR rates than patients with KS (41.95% with AZFc vs. 38.63% with KS). When examining predictors of SSR in KS patients, younger age was a significant predictor of positive SSR in patients undergoing microsurgical testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE). Higher testosterone was a favourable predictor in those undergoing micro-TESE and conventional TESE. Lower luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicular stimulating hormone (FSH) values were significantly associated with positive SSR with testicular sperm aspiration (TESA). No parameter predicted SSR rates in patients with AZFc microdeletions. Overall, genetic abnormalities have significant implications on SSR success in patients with NOA.