Impact of baseline pool impedance on lesion metrics and steam pops in catheter ablation.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the impact of blood-pool local impedance (LI) on lesion characteristics and the incidence of steam pops. METHODS: Radiofrequency applications at a range of powers (30, 40, and 50 W), contact forces (CF) (5, 15, and 25 g), and durations (15, 30, 45, and 120 s) using perpendicular/parallel catheter orientation were performed in 40 excised porcine preparations, using a catheter capable of monitoring LI (StablePoint©, Boston Scientific). To simulate the variability in blood-pool impedance, the saline-pool LI was modulated by calibrating saline concentrations. Lesion characteristics were compared under three values of saline-pool LI: 120, 160, and 200 Ω. RESULTS: Of 648 lesions created, steam pops occurred in 175 (27.0%). When power, CF, time, and catheter orientation were adjusted, ablation at a saline-pool impedance of 160 or 200 Ω more than doubled the risk of steam pops compared with a saline-pool impedance of 120 Ω (Odds ratio = 2.31; p = .0002). Lesions in a saline-pool impedance of 120 Ω were significantly larger in surface area (50 [38-62], 45 [34-56], and 41 [34-60] mm2 for 120, 160, and 200 Ω, p < .05), but shallower in depth (4.0 [3-5], 4.4 [3.2-5.3], and 4.5 [3.8-5.5] mmfor 120, 160, and 200 Ω, respectively, p < .05) compared with the other two settings. The correlation between the absolute LI-drop and lesion size weakened as the saline-pool LI became higher (e.g., 120 Ω group (r2 = .30, r2 = .18, and r2 = .16, respectively for 120, 160, and 200 Ω), but the usage of %LI-drop (= absolute LI-drop/initial LI) instead of absolute LI-drop may minimize this effect. CONCLUSIONS: In an experimental model, baseline saline-pool impedance significantly affects the lesion metrics and the risk of steam pops.

Cardiac tamponade complicating ventricular arrhythmia ablation: Real life data on incidence, management, and outcome.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cardiac tamponade during ablation procedures is a life-threatening complication. While the incidence and management of tamponade in atrial fibrillation ablation have been extensively described, the data on tamponade during ventricular ablations are very limited. The purpose of this study is to shed light on the incidence, typical perforation sites, and optimal management as observed through real-life data in a tertiary referral center for ventricular ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with structural heart disease undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation from 2008-2020 were analyzed. Of the 1078 patients undergoing 1287 ventricular ablation procedures, 20 procedures (1.5%) were complicated by cardiac tamponade. In all but one patient, the tamponade was treated with emergent pericardial drainage, while nine patients eventually underwent surgical repair. The perforation occurred during transseptal or subxiphoid puncture in six patients, during ventricle mapping in two patients, and during ablation in five patients (predominantly basal left ventricle). Steam pop as definite perforation cause could only be established in two patients. Regardless of the management of the complication, all patients survived to discharge. CONCLUSION: Cardiac tamponade during ventricular ablation occurred in 1.5% of the procedures. In nine patients cardiac repair was necessary. Perforation was mostly associated with subxiphoid puncture or ablation of the basal left ventricle.

Performance and safety of temperature- and flow-controlled radiofrequency ablation for ventricular arrhythmia.

AIMS: High-power ablation is effective for ventricular arrhythmia ablation; however, it increases the risk of steam pops. The aim of this study was to define the safety and efficacy of QMODE ablation in the ventricle and the risk of steam pop. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients undergoing ventricular ablation using QDOT were included in a prospective single-centre registry. Procedural data, complications, and follow-up were systematically analysed and compared with a historical ventricular tachycardia (VT) and premature ventricular complexes (PVC) cohort ablated using STSF. QMODE (≤50 W) ablation was performed in 107 patients [age 62 ± 13 years; 76% male; VT (n = 41); PVC (n = 66)]. A total of 2456 applications were analysed [power: 45.9 ± 5.0 W with minimal power titration (90% > 95% max power); duration 26 ± 8 s; impedance drop 9.4 ± 4.7 Ω; ablation index: 569 ± 163; mean-max temperature 44.3 ± 2.6°C]. Ventricular tachycardia ablation was associated with shorter radiofrequency (RF) time and a trend towards shorter procedure times using QDOT (QDOT vs. STSF: 20.1 ± 14.7 vs. 31 ± 17 min; P = 0.002, 151 ± 59 vs. 172 ± 48 min; P = 0.06). Complications, VT recurrence, and mortality rates were comparable (QDOT vs. STSF: 2% vs. 2%; P = 0.9, 24% vs. 27%; P = 0.82, and 2% vs. 4%; P = 0.67). Five audible steam pops (0.02%) occurred. Premature ventricular complex ablation was associated with comparable RF and procedure times (QDOT vs. STSF: 4.8 ± 4.6 vs. 3.9 ± 3.1 min; P = 0.25 and 96.1 ± 31.9 vs. 94.6 ± 24.7 min; P = 0.75). Complication and PVC recurrence were also comparable (QDOT vs. STSF: 0% vs. 3%; P = 0.17 and 19% vs. 22%; P = 0.71). CONCLUSION: Ventricular ablation using QMODE ≤ 50 W is safe and effective for both VT and PVC ablation and is associated with a low risk for steam pop.

Safety verification of a novel irrigation catheter with flexible tip of laser-cut kerfs and contact force sensor.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The safety evaluation of TactiFlex, a novel contact-force sensing catheter with a flexible 4-mm tip irrigated through laser-cut kerfs, has been ongoing. This study aimed to verify the safety of this type of catheter. METHODS: Study 1: Radiofrequency (RF) applications at a range of powers (30-50 W), contact forces (10-20 g), and durations (10-60 s) using perpendicular/parallel catheter orientation with half-normal (HNS) or normal saline irrigation were compared between TactiFlex (4-mm tip) and TactiCath (3.5-mm tip) with temperature-controlled mode in excised porcine hearts. Study 2: The relation between RF applications using TactiFlex and the incidence of steam-pops in the real clinical cases were examined. RESULTS: Study-1: 576 RF lesions were examined. TactiFlex demonstrated a significantly lower risk of steam-pops (5[1.7%] vs. 59[20.5%], p < .0001). Compared to 3.5-mm-tip catheter (TactiCath), 4-mm-tip catheter (TactiFlex) produced smaller lesion volume at perpendicular (193[98-554]mm3 vs. 263[139-436]mm3 , p < .0001), but relatively similar lesion volume at parallel contact (243[105-443]mm3 vs. 278[180-440]mm3 , p = .06). HNS-irrigation tended to increase the lesion volume in both catheters and to increase the incidence of steam-pops with TactiCath, but not with TactiFlex. The cut-off value of %impedance-drop ( = absolute impedance-drop/initial impedance) of 20% predicted steam-pops with a sensitivity = 100% and specificity = 89.6% in TactiFlex. Study-2: 5496 RF applications in 84 patients (51AFs/8ATs/3AVNRTs/4AVRTs/17PVCs/4VTs) using TactiFlex were analyzed. Four steam-pops (0.07%) in three patients with pericardial effusion were observed (%impedance-drop = 24%/26%/29%/35%, respectively). The cut-off value of %impedance-drop = 20%, derived from ex-vivo study, showed sensitivity = 100% and specificity = 90.1% in detecting steam-pops. CONCLUSION: TactiFlex reduced the risk of steam-pops than TactiCath. %impedance-drop ≤ 20% may be reasonable for safely use with a sufficient safety margin. For 4-mm-tip catheter, parallel-contact may be recommended for larger lesion creation.

Impedance-decline-guide power control long application time bipolar radiofrequency catheter ablation.

INTRODUCTION: Bipolar (BIP) radiofrequency (RF) ablation creates deep myocardial lesions but ideal energy application modes to treat ventricular arrhythmias originating from deep inside the thick myocardium have not been well established. An experimental study was performed to clarify whether high power and long application time BIP ablation were performable by impedance-decline-guide power control (PC) and whether it could create transmural lesions in the thick ventricle with a minimum risk of steam-pop. METHODS AND RESULTS: Perfused porcine ventricle (18.4 ± 2.3 mm) was placed in an experimental bath and BIP ablation (50 W) for 120 s was attempted with catheter contact of 30-g using two protocols; fixed power (FP) and impedance-decline-guide PC. In the latter protocol, BIP ablation was started from 50 W, while the energy was decreased to 40-20 W according to the impedance decline during RF ablation. FP ablation was attempted in 30 applications and the transmural lesion was created in all 30, although steam-pop occurred in 16/30 applications (53%). Low minimum impedance, large total impedance decline (TID), and %-TID were associated with the steam-pop occurrence. PC ablation was attempted in another 21 applications, and the transmural lesion was created in all 21 without steam-pop. PC ablation was superior to FP ablation (21/21 vs. 14/30, p < .001) in the creation of a transmural lesion without resulting in steam-pop. CONCLUSIONS: High power and long application time BIP ablation seems to be feasible according to the impedance-decline-guide approach, which could create transmural lesions in thick porcine ventricles with minimal risk of steam-pop.

Radiofrequency ablation using a novel insulated-tip ablation catheter can create uniform lesions comparable in size to conventional irrigated ablation catheters while using a fraction of the energy and irrigation.

INTRODUCTION: During radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using conventional RFA catheters (RFC), ~90% of the energy dissipates into the bloodstream/surrounding tissue. We hypothesized that a novel insulated-tip ablation catheter (SMT) capable of blocking the radiofrequency path may focus most of the energy into the targeted tissue while utilizing reduced power and irrigation. METHODS: This study evaluated the outcomes of RFA using SMT versus an RFC in silico, ex vivo, and in vivo. Radiofrequency applications were delivered over porcine myocardium (ex vivo) and porcine thigh muscle preparations superfused with heparinized blood (in vivo). Altogether, 274 radiofrequency applications were delivered using SMT (4-15 W, 2 or 20 ml/min) and 74 applications using RFC (30 W, 30 ml/min). RESULTS: RFA using SMT proved capable of directing 66.8% of the radiofrequency energy into the targeted tissue. Accordingly, low power-low irrigation RFA using SMT (8-12 W, 2 ml/min) yielded lesion sizes comparable with RFC, whereas high power-high irrigation (15 W, 20 ml/min) RFA with SMT yielded lesions larger than RFC (p < .05). Although SMT was associated with greater impedance drops ex vivo and in vivo, ablation using RFC was associated with increased charring/steam pop/tissue cavitation (p < .05). Lastly, lesions created with SMT were more homogeneous than RFC (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Low power-low irrigation (8-12 W, 2 ml/min) RFA using the novel SMT ablation catheter can create more uniform, but comparable-sized lesions as RFC with reduced charring/steam pop/tissue cavitation. High power-high irrigation (15 W, 20 ml/min) RFA with SMT yields lesions larger than RFC.

Ablation characteristics and incidence of steam pops with a novel, surface temperature-controlled ablation system in an ex vivo experimental model.

BACKGROUND: A novel irrigation catheter (QDOT MICRO™) has been introduced, which enables a surface temperature-controlled ablation combined with tip cooling. However, the detailed description of its complex behavior and effect on the incidence of pops and lesion formation remains elusive. This study aimed to systematically investigate the ablation characteristics, feedback behavior, and incidence of steam pops in a simplified ex vivo swine model. METHODS: Using swine ventricular tissue perfused with saline at 37°C, we systematically created lesions with 4×3 combinations of the wattage (20, 30, 40, and 50 W) and contact force (CF, 10, 30, and 50 g). Ablation was continued for either 120 s or until a steam pop occurred and repeated 10 times with each setting. The lesion geometry, ablation index, feedback dynamics, and conditions underlying the steam pops were measured and analyzed. RESULTS: Steam pops occurred particularly frequently in combinations of a low CF and high power (10 g vs. 30 g+50 g [p < .0001]; 40 W+50 W vs. 20 W+30 W [p < .0001]). Failure to activate a feedback process was associated with a 5.1 times higher incidence of steam pops (21/109 vs.11/11, [95% CI 3.499-7.716], p < .0001). The wattage feedback was particularly evident with a high CF (30 and 50 g) and high initial wattage (40 and 50 W). The average delivered wattage at 27 W predicted the occurrence of steam pops. CONCLUSION: The temperature-controlled ablation with the QDOT MICRO™ demonstrated a complex feedback behavior, which contributed to a reduced incidence of steam pops and prolonged lead time to the pops.

RF electrode-tissue coverage significantly influences steam pop incidence and lesion size.

BACKGROUND: Steam pops are a rare complication associated with radiofrequency (RF) ablation and are hard to predict. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of coverage between the RF ablation electrode and cardiac tissue on steam pop incidence and lesion size. METHODS AND RESULTS: An ex vivo model using porcine cardiac preparations and contact force sensing catheters was designed to perform RF ablations at different coverage levels between the RF electrode and cardiac tissue. During coverage level I, only the distal part of the ablation electrode was in contact with tissue. During coverage level II half of the ablation electrode, and during coverage level III the entire ablation electrode was embedded in tissue. RF applications (n = 60) at different coverage levels I-III were systematically performed using the same standardized ablation protocol. Ablations during coverage level III resulted in a significantly higher rate of steam pops (100%) when compared to ablations during coverage level II (10%) and coverage level I (0%), log rank p < .001. Coverage level I ablations resulted in significantly smaller lesion depths, diameters, and impedance drops when compared to higher coverage level ablations, p < .001. In the controlled ex vivo model, there was no difference in applied contact force or energy between different coverage levels. CONCLUSIONS: The level of coverage between RF electrode, cardiac tissue, and the surrounding fluid significantly influenced the incidence of steam pops in an ex vivo setup. Larger coverage between RF electrode and tissue resulted in significantly larger lesion dimensions.

Impedance decrement indexes for avoiding steam-pop during bipolar radiofrequency ablation: An experimental study using a dual-bath preparation.

INTRODUCTION: This experimental study was conducted to explore impedance monitoring for safely performing bipolar (BIP) radiofrequency (RF) ablation targeted to arrhythmia focus. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a newly designed dual-bath experimental model, contact-force-controlled (20-g) BIP ablation (50 W, 60 s) was attempted for porcine left ventricle (17.0 ± 2.7 mm thickness). BIP ablation was successfully accomplished for 60 s in 75 of the 89 RF applications (84.3%), whereas audible steam-pop occurred in the other 14 RF applications (15.7%). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated the optimal predictive values regarding the occurrence of steam-pop as follows; thinner myocardial wall (≤14.8 mm), low minimum impedance (≤89 ohm), greater total impedance decrement (TID) (≤ -25 ohm) and %TID (≤ -22.5%). Greater impedance decrement was not observed immediately preceding the occurrence of steam-pop but appeared around 15 s before. Four steam-pops happened before reaching the optimal predictive values of minimum impedance, whereas all 14 steam-pops developed 11.5 ± 9.2 and 8.1 ± 8.1 s after reaching the optimal predictive values of TID and %TID, respectively. Total lesion depth (endocardial plus epicardial) was 10.7 ± 1.2 mm on average, and was well correlated with TID and %TID. Transmural lesion through the myocardial wall was created in 22 RF applications. CONCLUSION: Relatively thinner areas of the myocardium are likely to be at greater risk for steam-pop during BIP RF ablation. Lowering the RF application energy to reduce the impedance decrement may help to lessen this risk.

Bipolar ablation of refractory atrial and ventricular arrhythmias: Importance of temperature values of intracardiac return electrodes.

INTRODUCTION: Bipolar radiofrequency catheter ablation (Bi-RFCA) emerged as an option for treatment of arrhythmias resistant to the conventional approach. Data on safety issues of Bi-RFCA, including temperature values of intracardiac return electrode (IRE) are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety profile of Bi-RFCA regarding temperature measurements obtained from nonirrigated IRE of different sizes. METHODS: The study group consisted of consecutive patients after failed conventional RFCA who underwent Bi-RFCA. RESULTS: Out of 1510 RFCA performed in our center, 19 patients underwent Bi-RFCA due to refractory to previous RFCA ventricular arrhythmias (15 patients) or typical atrial flutter (four patients). Nonirrigated small (4 mm) and large (8 mm) tip catheters were used as IRE in 14 (including three cross-overs to 8 mm IRE) and five patients, respectively. A total number of 164 bipolar applications were performed (128 for 4 mm and 36 for 8 mm IRE). Maximal temperatures of 4 mm IRE were significantly higher than those of 8 mm IRE (63°C ± 16°C vs 43°C ± 4°C; P = .027). A significant rise of temperature and steam-pops, preventing further Bi-RFCA, occurred in seven patients treated with 4 mm IRE. Bi-RFCA using 4 mm IRE operated at significantly higher impedance values (211 ± 83 vs 143 ± 38; P = .04) and lower power values (mean 20 W ± 6 W vs 32 W ± 7 W, P = .0005; max 29 W ± 9 W vs 39 W ± 10 W, P = .027). CONCLUSION: The use of 8 mm IRE for Bi-RFCA is associated with lower temperatures of the catheter used as ground and lower incidence of steam-pops which may suggest a better safety profile than 4 mm IRE. Determination of safety/efficacy balance requires further studies.

Lesion Size and Safety Comparison Between the Novel Flex Tip on the FlexAbility Ablation Catheter and the Solid Tips on the ThermoCool and ThermoCool SF Ablation Catheters.

INTRODUCTION: Next-generation catheters have been developed to reduce irrigation volume and preserve power delivery. A novel design uses a flexible tip (FlexAbility™ catheter) that directs flow to the contact surface. Because of recent safety issues with new catheters, we undertook a study in a canine heart with 3 irrigated catheters to compare efficacy and safety. METHODS: Endocardial ablation was performed by 2 independent operators in 12 anesthetized canines with the FlexAbility (St. Jude Medical), ThermoCool™ (Biosense Webster), and ThermoCool™ SF (Biosense Webster) catheters. Endocardial RF lesions were delivered with each catheter in all 4 chambers of each animal for 52 ± 16 seconds. Each chamber was randomized to receive ablation from one catheter with recording of safety events. Cardiac pathology was performed with triphenyl tetrazolium chloride stain. RESULTS: Average lesion dimensions were not significantly different between the 3 catheters. FlexAbility™ demonstrated a lower risk of steam pops relative to ThermoCool SF (P-value = 0.013) despite equal mean power and radiofrequency time. High-temperature generator shutdowns were observed with FlexAbility™ but not with either ThermoCool catheter. High-temperature shutdowns were associated with larger average impedance drops (28.5 ohms vs. 19 ohms) without compromising lesion size. CONCLUSIONS: The FlexAbility™ tip is safe and effective with no significant difference in lesion sizes compared to both standard ThermoCool and ThermoCool SF. FlexAbility™ has a significantly lower risk of steam pops compared to ThermoCool SF in a beating heart as defined predominantly by an abrupt rise of impedance.

Isolated Disruption of the Right Coronary Artery Following a Steam Pop during Cavotricuspid Linear Ablation with a Contact Force Catheter.

A 70-year-old woman with persistent atrial fibrillation underwent pulmonary vein isolation and linear ablation with a contact sensor catheter. During cavotricuspid isthmus ablation, a steam pop resulted in cardiac tamponade, and the patient developed severe hypotension despite successful pericardial puncture and minimal residual pericardial effusion. Right coronary artery angiography revealed extravasal contrast medium accumulation posterior of the Crux Cordis. Emergent cardiac surgery confirmed isolated disruption of the artery in the absence of additional heart perforation. Although contact sensor catheters may reduce complications, steam pops can still occur and result in dramatic complications.

The Incidence of Audible Steam Pops Is Increased and Unpredictable With the ThermoCool® Surround Flow Catheter During Left Atrial Catheter Ablation: A Prospective Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Open irrigated radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheters with a porous tip (56 holes, TC-SF) permit delivering RF energy in a temperature-controlled mode without temperature rise. This prospective observational study investigated the association of different catheter parameters on the occurrence of audible steam pops during left atrial (LA) ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 226 patients underwent TC-SF catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. RF power delivery, impedance and catheter tip temperature were continually recorded throughout the ablation. Pulmonary vein isolation was performed with a maximum of 27 W and LA electrogram-guided or linear ablation with a maximum of 30 W. A total of 59 audible steam pops occurred, 2 of them resulting in pericardial tamponade. In the initial 89 patients, with an irrigation flow rate of 10 mL/min, 18 steam pops with one tamponade occurred in 12 (14%) patients. Subsequently, the irrigation flow rate was increased to 20 mL/min in the following 137 patients, resulting in the occurrence of 41 steam pops including one case of tamponade in a total of 30 (22%) patients. The maximal power was significantly higher in RF applications associated with a pop than those that did not. In only 12 (20%) steam pops, a significant impedance change occurred immediately before pop occurrence (4 [7%] impedance rise >10 ohm, 8 [13%] impedance drop >15 ohm). CONCLUSIONS: The TC-SF catheter does not provide sufficient feedback from the ablated tissue to prevent steam popping.

The benefits of ablation using TactiFlex compared with TactiCath in an ex vivo model: a face-to-face experimental comparison study.

BACKGROUND: TactiFlex is a next-generation catheter that is being used increasingly in ablation-treatment strategies. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in ablation lesions when the ablation power, time, and perfusion flow are varied with TactiFlex and TactiCath catheters. METHODS: The TactiFlex and TactiCath catheters were contacted perpendicularly/obliquely/parallel to the swine myocardium at varying powers (30, 40, and 50 W), time points (10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 40 s), and forces (5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 g); the depth, width, and area of each lesion were measured, and the number of steam pops that occurred was counted. RESULTS: A total of 672 (336 lesions for each catheter) radiofrequency (RF) energy applications were delivered and 648 lesions were analyzed, excluding steam pops. The surface area and volume increased significantly with an increasing contact force for the TactiCath. The TactiCath lesions were significantly deeper than those for TactiFlex in most groups with the same power and seconds. The surface area was significantly larger when the catheters were contacted obliquely/parallel to the myocardium than perpendicularly using TactiCath, whereas the difference was less significant in the case of TactiFlex. In a 10-g contact force ablation experiment, TactiFlex did not cause pops, but TactiCath caused pops in 9.8% of cases. CONCLUSION: The TactiFlex lesions were shallower than those of TactiCath. However, TactiFlex catheters reduced the steam pops during RF applications. Those data should help clinicians understand the characteristics of the catheters and develop adequate strategies.

Bipolar endo-epicardial RF ablation: Animal feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Bipolar radiofrequency ablation (B-RFA) is a method used to treat the arrhythmia substrate resistant to unipolar ablation. Few studies have addressed endo-epicardial B-RFA. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate chronic lesions resulting from endo-epicardial B-RFA and to determine optimal settings for such procedures in an animal model. METHODS: In 7 pigs, up to 5 radiofrequency applications per animal were performed with 2 electrodes placed on both sides of the left ventricular free wall. Current was delivered for 60 seconds by a generator dedicated for B-RFA with power settings of 25, 30, 35, 40, and 50 W. RESULTS: At 12 weeks after ablation, 31 lesions were assessed. Their maximal cross-sectional area ranged from 7.2 to 68 mm2 and correlated with total power delivered (r = 0.53), with temperature increment at the endocardial catheter (r = 0.65), and inversely with temperature decrement at the epicardial catheter (r = 0.54). For power values between 30 and 40 W, the lesion area did not differ significantly (P = .92). Lesion depth ranged from 1.9 to 11 mm and correlated with impedance decrement (r = 0.5). Lesions were transmural in 8 cases. Lesion depth/wall thickness ratio was on average 0.6 ± 0.3, with the smallest value for 25 W (0.5 ± 0.3) and the largest for 50 W (0.8 ± 0.3). Steam pops occurred at a power range of 30-50 W, with an incidence of 1 in 5 applications, with 1 case of fatal tamponade at 40 W. Impedance decrement, endocardial catheter temperature increment, and endocardial electrogram amplitude decrement were greater during applications with steam pops. CONCLUSION: Chronic lesions resulting from endo-epicardial B-RFA appear smaller and less often transmural compared with acute lesions described in the literature. The incidence of steam pops during endo-epicardial B-RFA is relatively high even at low powers.

Occurrence of steam pops during irrigated RF ablation: novel insights from microwave radiometry.

BACKGROUND: The disparity between catheter and tissue temperatures during irrigated RF ablation frustrates one's ability to predict steam pops. Microwave radiometry allows for "volumetric" temperature assessment-i.e., within a circumscribed volume around the catheter tip-permitting, direct assessment of temperature during ablation. The aim of this study was to examine (i) the ability of microwave radiometry to predict steam pops, and (ii) compare this to traditional parameters such as power, catheter temperature, and impedance. METHODS AND RESULTS: Irrigated RF ablation was performed in 8 sheep using the Tempasure ablation catheter in all chambers. Power, impedance, catheter tip, and volumetric temperature were continually monitored. Ablation was terminated after a pop or at 60 seconds. A pop was defined as an audible or visualized pop (intracardiac echocardiography). Predictors of pops were determined by univariate and multivariate GEE logistic regression modeling. A total of 48 pops occurred during 143 lesions applied at 20-50 W. There was no association between the chamber of the heart and the occurrence of pops. The rate of rise of volumetric temperature (greater than 1.5 °C/s) was the single best predictor of pops (OR: 88.8 [95% CI: 12-604], P < 0.0007). Pops only occurred above a maximum volumetric temperature threshold of 89 °C. CONCLUSIONS: During irrigated RF ablation, steam pop occurrence can be predicted by both, the rate of rise and the maximum volumetric temperature measured by microwave radiometry.

Intramyocardial Hematoma During Catheter Ablation for Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Intramural hematoma during ablation for scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a rare but life-threatening complication. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to describe the features and outcomes of intramural hematoma during ablation for scar-related VT. METHODS: From 2010 to 2022, >3,514 ablations for ventricular arrhythmias were performed at 2 institutions. Four cases of intramural hematoma complicating VT ablation for scar-related VT were identified. Intraprocedural details, imaging data, and surgical notes were reviewed to create a recognizable pattern of events highlighting this complication. RESULTS: In 3 of 4 cases, intramural hematoma occurred during catheter ablation with an open irrigated 3.5 mm tipped catheter using normal saline for irrigation. In one case, hematoma was noted after ablation using an investigational needle electrode catheter. The occurrence of a steam pop preceded detection of an expanding intramural hematoma in 3 cases. ST-segment elevation on electrocardiography was evident in 3 cases; intracardiac echocardiographic imaging detected the hematoma in all cases. Epicardial rupture and pericardial effusion requiring drainage occurred in 3 cases, whereas 1 hematoma was self-contained and did not require intervention. Surgical intervention was performed in 2 cases, with successful outcomes. One patient who was deemed not a surgical candidate died of progressive cardiogenic shock. CONCLUSIONS: Intramural hematoma during ablation for scar-related VT is a rare but potentially catastrophic complication that requires prompt recognition. Steam pops during ablation frequently precede the hematoma formation. Surgical intervention may be life-saving, although contained hematomas can occasionally be managed conservatively.

Tissue poromechanical deformation effects on steam pop likelihood in 3-D radiofrequency cardiac ablation.

Radiofrequency Cardiac Ablation (RFCA) is a common procedure that heats cardiac tissue to destroy abnormal signal pathways to eliminate arrhythmias. The complex multiphysics phenomena during this procedure need to be better understood to improve both procedure and device design. A deformable poromechanical model of cardiac tissue was developed that coupled joule heating from the electrode, heat transfer, and blood flow from normal perfusion and thermally driven natural convection, which mimics the real tissue structure more closely and provides more realistic results compared to previous models. The expansion of tissue from temperature rise reduces blood velocity, leading to increased tissue temperature, thus affecting steam pop occurrence. Detailed temperature velocity, and thermal expansion of the tissue provided a comprehensive picture of the process. Poromechanical expansion of the tissue from temperature rise reduces blood velocity, increasing tissue temperature. Tissue properties influence temperatures, with lower porosity increasing the temperatures slightly, due to lower velocities. Deeper electrode insertion raises temperature due to increased current flow. The results demonstrate that a 5% increase in porosity leads to a considerable 10% increase in maximum tissue temperature. These insights should greatly help in avoiding undesirable heating effects that can lead to steam pop and in designing improved electrodes.

Impact of tip design and thermocouple location on the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency application.

BACKGROUND: The FlexAbility™ SE catheter has a laser-cut 8Fr 4-mm flexible tip irrigated through laser-cut kerfs with a thermocouple 0.3 mm from the distal end. The TactiCath™ SE catheter has an 8Fr 3.5-mm tip and 6-irrigation port with a thermocouple 2.67 mm proximal to the tip. We investigated the impact of these differences on the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency (RF) applications. METHODS: RF applications at a range of powers (20 W, 30 W, and 40 W), contact forces (5 g, 15 g, and 25 g), and durations (10-60 s) using perpendicular/parallel catheter orientation were performed in excised porcine hearts. Lesion characteristics and incidence of steam pops were compared. RESULTS: A total of 540 lesions were examined. The FlexAbility™ SE catheter produced smaller lesion depths (4.0 mm vs. 4.4 mm, p = 0.014 at 20 W; 4.6 mm vs. 5.6 mm, p = 0.015 at 30 W), surface areas (22.7mm2 vs. 29.2mm2 at 20 W, p = 0.005; 23.2mm2 vs. 28.7mm2, p = 0.009 at 30 W), and volumes (126.1mm3 vs. 175.1mm3, p = 0.018 at 20 W; 183.2mm3 vs. 304.3mm3, p = 0.002 at 30 W) with perpendicular catheter placement. However, no differences were observed with parallel catheter placement. Steam-pops were significantly less frequently observed with the FlexAbility™ SE catheter (4% vs. 22%, p < 0.001) irrespective of catheter direction to the tissue. Multivariate analysis showed that use of the TactiCath™ SE catheter, power ≥ 40 W, contact force ≥ 25 g, RF duration > 30 s, parallel angle, and impedance drop ≥ 20Ω were significantly associated with occurrence of steam-pops. CONCLUSIONS: The FlexAbility™ SE catheter reduced the risk of steam-pops but produced smaller lesions with perpendicular catheter placement compared to the TactiCath™ SE catheter.

Safe and effective delivery of high-power, short-duration radiofrequency ablation lesions with a flexible-tip ablation catheter.

Background: High-power, short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may reduce ablation time. Concerns that catheter-mounted thermocouples (TCs) can underestimate tissue temperature, resulting in elevated risk of steam pop formation, potentially limit widespread adoption of HPSD ablation. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of HPSD and low-power, long-duration (LPLD) RFA in the context of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods: An open-irrigated ablation catheter with a contact force sensor and a flexible-tip electrode containing a TC at its distal end (TactiFlexTM Ablation Catheter, Sensor EnabledTM, Abbott) was used to isolate the left pulmonary veins (PVs) in 12 canines with HPSD RFA (50 W for 10 seconds) and LPLD RFA (30 W for a maximum of 60 seconds). PVI was assessed at 30 minutes and 28 ± 3 days postablation. Computed tomographic scans were performed to assess PV stenosis after RFA. Lesions were evaluated with histopathology. Results: A total of 545 ablations were delivered: 252 with LPLD (0 steam pops) and 293 with HPSD RFA (2 steam pops) (P = .501). Ablation time required to achieve PVI was >3-fold shorter for HPSD than for LPLD RFA (P = .001). All 24 PVs were isolated 30 minutes after ablation, with 12/12 LPLD-ablated and 11/12 HPSD-ablated PVs still isolated at follow-up. Histopathology revealed transmural ablations for HPSD and LPLD RFA. No major adverse events occurred. Conclusion: An investigational ablation catheter effectively delivered RFA lesions. Ablation time required to achieve PVI with HPSD with this catheter was >3-fold shorter than with LPLD RFA.