Super-enhancers include classical enhancers and facilitators to fully activate gene expression.

Super-enhancers are compound regulatory elements that control expression of key cell identity genes. They recruit high levels of tissue-specific transcription factors and co-activators such as the Mediator complex and contact target gene promoters with high frequency. Most super-enhancers contain multiple constituent regulatory elements, but it is unclear whether these elements have distinct roles in activating target gene expression. Here, by rebuilding the endogenous multipartite α-globin super-enhancer, we show that it contains bioinformatically equivalent but functionally distinct element types: classical enhancers and facilitator elements. Facilitators have no intrinsic enhancer activity, yet in their absence, classical enhancers are unable to fully upregulate their target genes. Without facilitators, classical enhancers exhibit reduced Mediator recruitment, enhancer RNA transcription, and enhancer-promoter interactions. Facilitators are interchangeable but display functional hierarchy based on their position within a multipartite enhancer. Facilitators thus play an important role in potentiating the activity of classical enhancers and ensuring robust activation of target genes.

A CTCF-binding site in the Mdm1-Il22-Ifng locus shapes cytokine expression profiles and plays a critical role in early Th1 cell fate specification.

Cytokine expression during T cell differentiation is a highly regulated process that involves long-range promoter-enhancer and CTCF-CTCF contacts at cytokine loci. Here, we investigated the impact of dynamic chromatin loop formation within the topologically associating domain (TAD) in regulating the expression of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) and interleukin-22 (IL-22); these cytokine loci are closely located in the genome and are associated with complex enhancer landscapes, which are selectively active in type 1 and type 3 lymphocytes. In situ Hi-C analyses revealed inducible TADs that insulated Ifng and Il22 enhancers during Th1 cell differentiation. Targeted deletion of a 17 bp boundary motif of these TADs imbalanced Th1- and Th17-associated immunity, both in vitro and in vivo, upon Toxoplasma gondii infection. In contrast, this boundary element was dispensable for cytokine regulation in natural killer cells. Our findings suggest that precise cytokine regulation relies on lineage- and developmental stage-specific interactions of 3D chromatin architectures and enhancer landscapes.

Effects of super-enhancers in cancer metastasis: mechanisms and therapeutic targets.

Metastasis remains the principal cause of cancer-related lethality despite advancements in cancer treatment. Dysfunctional epigenetic alterations are crucial in the metastatic cascade. Among these, super-enhancers (SEs), emerging as new epigenetic regulators, consist of large clusters of regulatory elements that drive the high-level expression of genes essential for the oncogenic process, upon which cancer cells develop a profound dependency. These SE-driven oncogenes play an important role in regulating various facets of metastasis, including the promotion of tumor proliferation in primary and distal metastatic organs, facilitating cellular migration and invasion into the vasculature, triggering epithelial-mesenchymal transition, enhancing cancer stem cell-like properties, circumventing immune detection, and adapting to the heterogeneity of metastatic niches. This heavy reliance on SE-mediated transcription delineates a vulnerable target for therapeutic intervention in cancer cells. In this article, we review current insights into the characteristics, identification methodologies, formation, and activation mechanisms of SEs. We also elaborate the oncogenic roles and regulatory functions of SEs in the context of cancer metastasis. Ultimately, we discuss the potential of SEs as novel therapeutic targets and their implications in clinical oncology, offering insights into future directions for innovative cancer treatment strategies.

Mechanism of ERBB2 gene overexpression by the formation of super-enhancer with genomic structural abnormalities in lung adenocarcinoma without clinically actionable genetic alterations.

BACKGROUND: In an extensive genomic analysis of lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs), driver mutations have been recognized as potential targets for molecular therapy. However, there remain cases where target genes are not identified. Super-enhancers and structural variants are frequently identified in several hundred loci per case. Despite this, most cancer research has approached the analysis of these data sets separately, without merging and comparing the data, and there are no examples of integrated analysis in LUAD. METHODS: We performed an integrated analysis of super-enhancers and structural variants in a cohort of 174 LUAD cases that lacked clinically actionable genetic alterations. To achieve this, we conducted both WGS and H3K27Ac ChIP-seq analyses using samples with driver gene mutations and those without, allowing for a comprehensive investigation of the potential roles of super-enhancer in LUAD cases. RESULTS: We demonstrate that most genes situated in these overlapped regions were associated with known and previously unknown driver genes and aberrant expression resulting from the formation of super-enhancers accompanied by genomic structural abnormalities. Hi-C and long-read sequencing data further corroborated this insight. When we employed CRISPR-Cas9 to induce structural abnormalities that mimicked cases with outlier ERBB2 gene expression, we observed an elevation in ERBB2 expression. These abnormalities are associated with a higher risk of recurrence after surgery, irrespective of the presence or absence of driver mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that aberrant gene expression linked to structural polymorphisms can significantly impact personalized cancer treatment by facilitating the identification of driver mutations and prognostic factors, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of LUAD pathogenesis.

Super-Enhancers and Their Parts: From Prediction Efforts to Pathognomonic Status.

Super-enhancers (SEs) are regions of the genome that play a crucial regulatory role in gene expression by promoting large-scale transcriptional responses in various cell types and tissues. Recent research suggests that alterations in super-enhancer activity can contribute to the development and progression of various disorders. The aim of this research is to explore the multifaceted roles of super-enhancers in gene regulation and their significant implications for understanding and treating complex diseases. Here, we study and summarise the classification of super-enhancer constituents, their possible modes of interaction, and cross-regulation, including super-enhancer RNAs (seRNAs). We try to investigate the opportunity of SE dynamics prediction based on the hierarchy of enhancer single elements (enhancers) and their aggregated action. To further our understanding, we conducted an in silico experiment to compare and differentiate between super-enhancers and locus-control regions (LCRs), shedding light on the enigmatic relationship between LCRs and SEs within the human genome. Particular attention is paid to the classification of specific mechanisms and their diversity, exemplified by various oncological, cardiovascular, and immunological diseases, as well as an overview of several anti-SE therapies. Overall, the work presents a comprehensive analysis of super-enhancers across different diseases, aiming to provide insights into their regulatory roles and may act as a rationale for future clinical interventions targeting these regulatory elements.

Pathogenic role of super-enhancers as potential therapeutic targets in lung cancer.

Lung cancer is still one of the deadliest malignancies today, and most patients with advanced lung cancer pass away from disease progression that is uncontrollable by medications. Super-enhancers (SEs) are large clusters of enhancers in the genome's non-coding sequences that actively trigger transcription. Although SEs have just been identified over the past 10 years, their intricate structure and crucial role in determining cell identity and promoting tumorigenesis and progression are increasingly coming to light. Here, we review the structural composition of SEs, the auto-regulatory circuits, the control mechanisms of downstream genes and pathways, and the characterization of subgroups classified according to SEs in lung cancer. Additionally, we discuss the therapeutic targets, several small-molecule inhibitors, and available treatment options for SEs in lung cancer. Combination therapies have demonstrated considerable advantages in preclinical models, and we anticipate that these drugs will soon enter clinical studies and benefit patients.

Identification of potential pathogenic hepatic super-enhancers regulatory network in high-fat diet induced hyperlipidemia.

Hyperlipidemia (HLP) is a prevalent metabolic disorder and a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease. According to recent discoveries, super-enhancers (SEs) play a role in the increased expression of genes that encode important regulators of both cellular identity and the progression of diseases. However, the underlying function of SEs in the development of HLP is still unknown. We performed an integrative analysis of data on H3K27ac ChIP-seq and RNA sequencing obtained from liver tissues of mice under a low-fat diet (LFD) and high-fat diet (HFD) from GEO database. The rank ordering of super enhancers algorithm was employed for the computation and identification of SEs. A total of 1,877 and 1,847 SEs were identified in the LFD and HFD groups, respectively. The SE inhibitor JQ1 was able to potently reverse lipid deposition and the increased intracellular triglyceride and total cholesterol induced by oleic acid, indicating that SEs are involved in regulating lipid accumulation. Two hundred seventy-eight were considered as HFD-specific SEs (HSEs). GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the upregulated HSEs-associated genes revealed that they were mainly involved in lipid metabolic pathway. Four hub genes, namely Cd36, Pex11a, Ech1, and Cidec, were identified in the HSEs-associated protein-protein interaction network, and validated with two other datasets. Finally, we constructed a HSEs-specific regulatory network with Cidec and Cd36 as the core through the prediction and verification of transcription factors. Our study constructed a HSEs-associated regulatory network in the pathogenesis of HLP, providing new ideas for the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic targets of HLP.

m6A-dependent upregulation of DDX21 by super-enhancer-driven IGF2BP2 and IGF2BP3 facilitates progression of acute myeloid leukaemia.

BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a haematological malignancy with unfavourable prognosis. Despite the effectiveness of chemotherapy and targeted therapy, relapse or drug resistance remains a major threat to AML patients. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation and super-enhancers (SEs) are extensively involved in the leukaemogenesis of AML. However, the potential relationship between m6A and SEs in AML has not been elaborated. METHODS: Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) sequencing data from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) cohort were analysed to search SE-related genes. The mechanisms of m6 A-binding proteins IGF2BP2 and IGF2BP3 on DDX21 were explored via methylated RNA immunoprecipitation (MeRIP) assays, RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assays and luciferase reporter assays. Then we elucidated the roles of DDX21 in AML through functional assays in vitro and in vivo. Finally, co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assays, RNA sequencing and ChIP assays were performed to investigate the downstream mechanisms of DDX21. RESULTS: We identified two SE-associated transcripts IGF2BP2 and IGF2BP3 in AML. High enrichment of H3K27ac, H3K4me1 and BRD4 was observed in IGF2BP2 and IGF2BP3, whose expression were driven by SE machinery. Then IGF2BP2 and IGF2BP3 enhanced the stability of DDX21 mRNA in an m6A-dependent manner. DDX21 was highly expressed in AML patients, which indicated a poor survival. Functionally, knockdown of DDX21 inhibited cell proliferation, promoted cell apoptosis and led to cell cycle arrest. Mechanistically, DDX21 recruited transcription factor YBX1 to cooperatively trigger ULK1 expression. Moreover, silencing of ULK1 could reverse the promoting effects of DDX21 overexpression in AML cells. CONCLUSIONS: Dysregulation of SE-IGF2BP2/IGF2BP3-DDX21 axis facilitated the progression of AML. Our findings provide new insights into the link between SEs and m6A modification, elucidate the regulatory mechanisms of IGF2BP2 and IGF2BP3 on DDX21, and reveal the underlying roles of DDX21 in AML.

Integrative analysis and risk model construction for super­enhancer­related immune genes in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer associated with poor prognosis, and accounts for the majority of RCC-related deaths. The lack of comprehensive diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers has limited further understanding of the pathophysiology of ccRCC. Super-enhancers (SEs) are congregated enhancer clusters that have a key role in tumor processes such as epithelial-mesenchymal transition, metabolic reprogramming, immune escape and resistance to apoptosis. RCC may also be immunogenic and sensitive to immunotherapy. In the present study, an Arraystar human SE-long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) microarray was first employed to profile the differentially expressed SE-lncRNAs and mRNAs in 5 paired ccRCC and peritumoral tissues and to identify SE-related genes. The overlap of these genes with immune genes was then determined to identify SE-related immune genes. A model for predicting clinical prognosis and response to immunotherapy was built following the comprehensive analysis of a ccRCC gene expression dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The patients from TCGA were divided into high- and low-risk groups based on the median score derived from the risk model, and the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the low-risk group had a higher survival probability. In addition, according to the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the risk model had more advantages than other clinical factors in predicting the overall survival (OS) rate of patients with ccRCC. Using this model, it was demonstrated that the high-risk group had a more robust immune response. Furthermore, 61 potential drugs with half-maximal inhibitory concentration values that differed significantly between the two patient groups were screened to investigate potential drug treatment of ccRCC. In summary, the present study provided a novel index for predicting the survival probability of patients with ccRCC and may provide some insights into the mechanisms through which SE-related immune genes influence the diagnosis, prognosis and potential treatment drugs of ccRCC.

Super-enhancer interactomes from single cells link clustering and transcription.

Regulation of gene expression hinges on the interplay between enhancers and promoters, traditionally explored through pairwise analyses. Recent advancements in mapping genome folding, like GAM, SPRITE, and multi-contact Hi-C, have uncovered multi-way interactions among super-enhancers (SEs), spanning megabases, yet have not measured their frequency in single cells or the relationship between clustering and transcription. To close this gap, here we used multiplexed imaging to map the 3D positions of 376 SEs across thousands of mammalian nuclei. Notably, our single-cell images reveal that while SE-SE contacts are rare, SEs often form looser associations we termed "communities". These communities, averaging 4-5 SEs, assemble cooperatively under the combined effects of genomic tethers, Pol2 clustering, and nuclear compartmentalization. Larger communities are associated with more frequent and larger transcriptional bursts. Our work provides insights about the SE interactome in single cells that challenge existing hypotheses on SE clustering in the context of transcriptional regulation.

Multifaceted roles of cohesin in regulating transcriptional loops.

Cohesin is required for chromatin loop formation. However, its precise role in regulating gene transcription remains largely unknown. We investigated the relationship between cohesin and RNA Polymerase II (RNAPII) using single-molecule mapping and live-cell imaging methods in human cells. Cohesin-mediated transcriptional loops were highly correlated with those of RNAPII and followed the direction of gene transcription. Depleting RAD21, a subunit of cohesin, resulted in the loss of long-range (>100 kb) loops between distal (super-)enhancers and promoters of cell-type-specific genes. By contrast, the short-range (<50 kb) loops were insensitive to RAD21 depletion and connected genes that are mostly housekeeping. This result explains why only a small fraction of genes are affected by the loss of long-range chromatin interactions due to cohesin depletion. Remarkably, RAD21 depletion appeared to up-regulate genes located in early initiation zones (EIZ) of DNA replication, and the EIZ signals were amplified drastically without RAD21. Our results revealed new mechanistic insights of cohesin's multifaceted roles in establishing transcriptional loops, preserving long-range chromatin interactions for cell-specific genes, and maintaining timely order of DNA replication.

Super-enhancers: drivers of cells' identities and cells' debacles.

Precise spatiotemporal regulations of gene expression are essential for determining cells' fates and functions. Enhancers are cis-acting DNA elements that act as periodic transcriptional thrusters and their activities are cell type specific. Clusters of enhancers, called super-enhancers, are more densely occupied by transcriptional activators than enhancers, driving stronger expression of their target genes, which have prominent roles in establishing and maintaining cellular identities. Here we review the current knowledge on the composition and structure of super-enhancers to understand how they robustly stimulate the expression of cellular identity genes. We also review their involvement in the development of various cell types and both noncancerous and cancerous disorders, implying the therapeutic interest of targeting them to fight against various diseases.

Role and Mechanism of Super-enhancers in Tumor Metastasis / 肿瘤防治研究

Super-enhancers (SEs) are large clusters of enhancers located near the promoter and are necessary to determine the identity of cancer cells. The alterations of super-enhancers can cause dysregulation of the transcriptional program, which resulted in tumor cells being addicted to certain transcriptional programs. Tumor metastasis is the leading cause of death in cancer. Recently, SEs have been demonstrated to facilitate tumor metastasis by regulating lncRNA generation, tumor microenvironment, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and cancer stem cells. In this review, the characteristics of SEs, the relationship between SEs and tumor metastasis, and inhibitors against SEs are summarized to provide a reference for the relevant mechanism of SEs regulating tumor metastasis and provide new perspectives for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with cancer metastasis.

Progress on the BRD4 of super enhancer regulatory element in hematologic oncology / 国际儿科学杂志

Abnormal transcription of oncogenes driven by super enhancers was found to be critical for maintaining tumor cell identity.The expression of oncogenes can be effectively suppressed by inhibiting the key regulator that super enhancers regulate oncogene transcription.Bromodomain protein 4(BRD4)is a key protein to recognize the super enhancer regulatory elements, which can bind to acetylated histones or non-histones to regulate gene transcription.The abnormal expression of BRD4 is closely related to the malignant development of a variety of hematologic oncology.Targeting BRD4 can effectively control the malignant development of hematologic tumors.In recent years, BRD4-targeted drugs in hematologic oncology have received extensive attention, and they showed good antitumor effects either as a single drug or in combination with other drugs.In this paper, in order to provide a new understanding of the occurrence of leukemia and treatment of hematologic oncology, the biological functions of BRD4 as well as the molecular drugs targeting BRD4 are reviewed.

BRD4 inhibitors kill ABC-DLBCL cells by targeting BTK / 中国病理生理杂志

AIM:To investigate the effect of bromodomain-containing protein 4(BRD4)inhibitors on the via-bility and apoptosis of activated B cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma(ABC-DLBCL)cells and the molecular mecha-nism. METHODS:The ABC-DLBCL cells were treated with BRD4 inhibitors JQ1 and I-BET-762,and Bruton tyrosine kinase(BTK)inhibitor ibrutinib. The viability and death of the cells were determined by CCK-8 assay and PI staining,re-spectively. The mRNA levels of BTK,phospholipase Cγ(PLCγ),LYN,SYK,interleukin-6(IL-6),MYC,protein ki-nase Cβ(PKCβ),mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma translocation protein 1(MALT1),MYC and RELA were detected by real-time PCR. The protein levels of BTK,PLCγ,MYC and RELA were determined by Western blot. Super-enhancer around BTK gene was revealed by bioinformatics analysis. RESULTS:The ABC-DLBCL cells were sensitive to BRD4/super-enhancer inhibitors such as JQ1 and I-BET-762. Both JQ1 and I-BET-762 inhibited the chronic active B-cell receptor(BCR)/nuclear factorκB(NFκB)signaling through reducing the transcription of BTK,but they had minimal ef-fect on other components in BCR/NFκB signaling. Interestingly,there was no super-enhancer around BTK gene,and the inhibitory effect of JQ1 was likely due to disruption of BRD4 binding within BTK gene. Inhibition of BRD4 had synergic ef-fect with BTK inhibitor ibrutinib. Moreover,inhibition of BRD4 induced significant cell death in ibrutinib-resistant ABC-DLBCL cells. CONCLUSION:Inhibitors of BRD4 induce ABC-DLBCL cell death via blocking BCR/NFκB signaling and has synergic effect with BTK inhibitor. Inhibition of BRD4 might be a promising strategy for treatment of ABC-DLBCL,es-pecially ibrutinib-resistant ABC-DLBCL.