Impact of the 4th of August Beirut explosion mass casualty incident on a university hospital microbial Flora.

BACKGROUND: Following the Beirut explosion, our university hospital received at least 350 casualties. Subsequently, infection control standard practices were compromised. Concerns for Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms (MDROs) infections in injured patients and a resulting hospital outbreak were raised. The objectives of the study were to compare the rate of hospital growing MDROs 6 months before and 6 months after the Beirut explosion, to identify emerging microorganisms and to evaluate the change in surgical infection prevention practices. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of patients with hospital acquired infections (HAI) admitted to the hospital before and after the Beirut explosion. The study was conducted between February 4, 2020 and January 4, 2021. Excluded patients were those transferred from other hospitals and those with community acquired infections. The primary outcome was to identify the rate of growing MDROs post explosion. The secondary outcomes were identifying antibiotics used for surgical prophylaxis in patients requiring surgeries and patients diagnosed with a HAI. Therefore, patients were divided in three groups. Control group included patients admitted with explosion-related injuries on that same day. Patients admitted and between February 4 and August 4 and diagnosed with HAI were compared to those admitted post August 4 with explosion-related HAI and to patients diagnosed with non-explosion-related HAI between August 4 and January 4, 2021. An estimated rate of 18-22% MDRO was needed to achieve a statistical significance with 80% power and 0.05 α. Pearson Chi square test was used to analyze the primary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients with 150 cultures were included in this study. Data showed an increase in the rate of MDRO after the explosion with 37.1% of the cultures taken before the explosion and 53.1% after the explosion (p = 0.05). When comparing the types of HAI in both groups, culture sites were significantly different between pre- and post-explosion patients (p = 0.013). However, both groups had similar types of microbes (p = 0.996) with an increase in candida related infections. CONCLUSION: These findings confirmed that the Beirut explosion impact on antimicrobial resistance was similar to combat zone incidence, where an increase in MDROs rate such as Escherichia coli (E.Coli) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, in addition to the increase in candida related infections.

In Vitro Evaluation of Vancomycin-Induced Toxicity in Human Primary Knee Chondrocytes.

Septic arthritis as a complication of orthopaedic joint surgery can have catastrophic outcomes for patients. To minimise infection risk associated with elective orthopaedics, topical vancomycin during surgery has become increasingly common. Evidence suggests that high concentrations of vancomycin, following direct application of the drug to the joint, are toxic towards various local cell types in the joint, including chondrocytes. However, the mechanism of this vancomycin tissue toxicity is yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity of vancomycin on chondrocytes and the mechanisms of cell death involved. Human primary knee chondrocytes were exposed to vancomycin (1.25-10 mg/mL) for 24 h and their viability assessed using the resazurin reduction assay in vitro. Specific cell death mechanisms and their contributors, including reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and apoptosis, were measured. This study showed that high concentrations of vancomycin (5 and 10 mg/mL) were toxic towards human primary knee chondrocyte cells, while lower concentrations (1.25 and 2.5 mg/mL) were not. Cell death studies found that this occurred through an apoptotic pathway. This study provides additional support that vancomycin in high doses is toxic towards chondrocytes and preliminary evidence that this toxicity occurs via apoptotic cell death mechanisms.

When Antimicrobial Treatment and Surgical Prophylaxis Collide: A Stewardship Opportunity.

Background: In 2002, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established the Surgical Infection Prevention (SIP) project for the purposes of developing and standardizing quality improvement measures known to reduce the rates of post-operative surgical site infections (SSIs). Four years later the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP), an expansion of SIP, was published in governmental Specifications Manual for National Inpatient Quality Measures and provided several additional initiatives applicable to the perioperative period. Central to both projects are the assurance of the timeliness, selection, and duration of peri-operative surgical prophylactic antibiotics. In support of this objective, various medical associations, such as the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), have developed the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery. To ensure compliance with quality measures, hospitals are required to report data to the Physicians Quality Reporting System, which is then reviewed by CMS for reimbursement purposes and to measure hospital performance. To maintain optimal standards of care and satisfy all core measures, it is expected that patients undergoing most categories of surgical procedures receive prophylactic antibiotics. We recognized that patients already being administered antimicrobial therapy as treatment for the condition requiring the surgery not uncommonly also were prescribed unwarranted and redundant pre-operative antibiotics. Our study was meant to quantify such antibiotic redundancy, which only risks the development of antimicrobial resistance and adverse events, to bolster our and other hospitals antimicrobial stewardship programs. Methods: A retrospective analysis of computerized hospital records over a one-month period of time (November 2022) was conducted focusing on hospital admissions that involved surgical operative procedures. Only those patients who had received a pre-operative surgical prophylactic antibiotic were included in the analysis. Results: Of the 92 surgeries that fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 38 (41.3%) were performed on patients who were already receiving therapeutic antibiotics for more than 24 hours targeted to treat the infection for which they were undergoing surgery. These included laparoscopic cholecystectomy (24), appendectomy (12), wound debridement (12), and soft tissue incision and drainage procedures (9), comprising nearly 50% of each type of these operations performed during the study time period. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate a clear opportunity to strengthen both our, and presumably other, hospitals antimicrobial stewardship programs. Together with physician education, granting the pharmacy the ability to cancel unnecessary and redundant surgical prophylactic antibiotics would conceivably be of great benefit.

Do preoperative glucose levels predict risk of complications in orthopaedic surgery?

PURPOSE: Post-operative hyperglycemia is a known risk factor for post-surgical complications. The predictive value of pre-operative blood glucose levels, however, is less understood. This study aimed to determine if pre-operative screening blood glucose levels affect the rate of post-operative infection or wound complications. We also investigated if case urgency or anatomic location alters this relationship. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective chart review was performed to evaluate patients treated between 2018 and 2021. Subjects ≥ 18 years with closed, non-infected orthopaedic diagnoses requiring surgery were included. Case urgency, demographics, comorbidities, blood glucose level within twelve h prior to surgery, and hemoglobin A1c level within 3 months of surgery, were collected. Infections and wound complications were recorded as outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 775 subjects with a mean age of 61 (range 18-96) were identified, including 543 elective and 232 trauma patients, with a mean pre-operative fasting glucose value of 127.7 mg/dL (range, 49-388 mg/dL) and average HbA1c of 6.9%. The odds of infectious complications were increased by a factor of 1.01 for every 1-point increase in blood glucose (95% CI 1.01-1.02; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative blood glucose levels greater than 137 mg/dL were associated with an increase in wound complications, but not deep infections. Infection rates stratified by anatomic site and case urgency were not impacted by pre-operative glucose levels. The increased risk of poor wound healing in patients with pre-operative hyperglycemia demonstrates that day of surgery point-of-care blood glucose screening can be a useful risk stratification tool.

Oral sequential therapy in the treatment of post-surgical epidural abscess and subdural empyema.

PURPOSE: The management of post-surgical subdural empyema and subdural abscess is not standardised. The objective was to analyse the efficacy and safety of oral sequential therapy (OST). METHODS: Retrospective observational study in a tertiary hospital in Vigo (Spain). We included adult patients with subdural abscess or epidural empyema with microbiological isolation. Clinical and demographic variables, isolated microorganisms and treatment regimens were included, as well as mortality and adverse effects during the follow-up period. RESULTS: Thirty patients were reviewed, two died due to causes other than infection. Six-month recurrence rate was 2/28 and all other patients (26/28) had clinical cure at the end of the treatment. The commonest isolated microorganisms were Gram-positive, especially Staphylococcus aureus. The most widely used oral antibiotic was trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (80%). No side effects related to oral treatment were observed. CONCLUSION: After adequate source control, OST can be a safe practice in the management of post-surgical epidural abscess and subdural empyema.

Impact of narrowing perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for left ventricular assist device implantation.

BACKGROUND: Although infections are a significant potential complication among patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, standardized surgical infection prophylaxis (SIP) regimens are not well defined. At Montefiore Medical Center, a 4-drug SIP regimen containing fluconazole, ciprofloxacin, rifampin, and vancomycin was previously utilized. In January 2020, the antimicrobial stewardship program implemented a 2-drug SIP regimen of vancomycin and cefazolin to limit exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics. This study evaluated LVAD-associated infection rates prior to and following the SIP revision. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent LVAD implantation from 1/2018 to 4/2021 was performed. Infections were classified using the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation definitions. Infection rates at 2 weeks, 30 days, and 90 days post-implantation in the 4-drug SIP regimen (1/2018-12/2019) and the 2-drug SIP regimen (1/2020 to 4/2021) were compared. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients were included. The number of patients with LVAD-associated infections (including surgical site infections) was not significantly different in either SIP group at 2 weeks (9% vs. 4%, p = .64), 30 days (9% vs. 11%, p = .99), or 90 days (19% vs. 14%, p = .75). There was no statistically significant difference in 30 or 90-day mortality. LVAD-associated gram-negative (7% vs. 7%; p > .99) and fungal (5% vs. 0%; p = .51) infections were uncommon. The most common organism isolated was Staphylococcus aureus, and the most common type of infection was pneumonia in both SIP groups. CONCLUSION: No significant difference in LVAD-associated infections or infection-related mortality was observed with de-escalation of perioperative antibiotics. Additional studies with larger sample sizes are needed to endorse the findings of this study.

Behind the mask: extended use of surgical masks is not associated with increased risk of surgical site infection.

PURPOSE: COVID-19 has prompted significant policy change, with critical attention to the conservation of personal protective equipment (PPE). An extended surgical mask use policy was implemented at our institution, allowing use of one disposable mask per each individual, per day, for all the cases. We investigate the clinical impact of this policy change and its effect on the rate of 30-day surgical site infection (SSI). METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review was performed for all the elective pediatric general surgery cases performed pre-COVID from August 2019 to October 2019 and under the extended mask use policy from August 2020 to October 2020. Procedure type, SSI within 30 days, and postoperative interventions were recorded. RESULTS: Four hundred and eighty-eight cases were reviewed: 240 in the pre-COVID-19 cohort and 248 in the extended surgical mask use cohort. Three SSIs were identified in the 2019 cohort, and two in the 2020 cohort. All postoperative infections were superficial and resolved within 1 month of diagnosis with oral antibiotics. There were no deep space infections, readmissions, or infections requiring re-operation. CONCLUSION: Extended surgical mask use was not associated with increased SSI in this series of pediatric general surgery cases and may be considered an effective and safe strategy for resource conservation with minimal clinical impact.

Microbiological analysis of infectious lymphocele: Case series and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Infectious lymphocele is a rare post-operative complication of abdominal surgery, and few studies have focused on its causative organisms. The aim in this research is to clarify microbiology and appropriate empiric treatment of infective lymphocele. METHODS: We performed a single center, retrospective observational study between April 2000 and March 2018 with a case review and literature search. Data were collected in a chart review. RESULTS: Twenty-four cases were founded in our institution. 153 cases, including 16 cases from our institution, that detected causative organisms was also analyzed. Infectious lymphocele was found to occur post gynecological/urological surgery in cancer patients. We also reported that bacteremia incidence and the mortality rate of infectious lymphocele cases were very low. The major sites of infectious lymphocele were pelvis or inguinal area. Our case series and literature review showed Gram positive cocci were the major causative organisms, with Staphylococcus aureus constituting one third of them (53/153 cases). Streptococcus species (26/153cases) and coagulase negative Staphylococci (17/153 cases) were the second and third most detected organisms. CONCLUSION: In gynecologic and urologic cancer patients, Gram positive cocci were the most common organisms causing lymphocele infection. Gram-positive coverage might be reasonable for empiric therapy in infectious lymphocele.

Are facemasks a priority for all staff in theatre to prevent surgical site infections during shortages of supply? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The provision of facemasks must be prioritised when supplies are interrupted. These include supplies to operating rooms. The aim of this review is to evaluate the available evidence to determine the relative priority for the provision of facemasks in operating rooms to prevent surgical site infection. METHODS: A systematic search of OVID Medline, Embase & Cochrane Central was completed. Candidate full-text articles were identified and analysed by two reviewers who also assessed risk of bias. FINDINGS: Six studies were identified that described infections with and without facemask usage. The pooled effect of not wearing facemasks was a risk ratio for infection of 0.77 (0.62-0.97) in favour of not wearing masks. Only one case-controlled study evaluated facemask usage in implant surgery and demonstrated an odds ratio for developing infection of 3.34 (95% CI 1.94-5.74) if facemasks were not worn by the operating surgeon. Four studies collected microbiological cultures during periods in surgery with or without facemasks. Two demonstrated an increase in colony forming units in surgery where the wound was directly below the surgeon. One study showed equivocal results when masks were worn, and one was terminated early limiting interpretation. CONCLUSION: The use of facemasks by scrubbed staff during implant surgery should be mandatory to prevent infection. We recommend the use of facemasks by all scrubbed staff during other forms of surgery to protect the patient and staff, but the supporting evidence is weak. There is insufficient evidence to show that non-scrubbed staff must wear masks during surgery.

Surgical infection prophylaxis prior to left ventricular assist device implantation: A survey of clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Short duration, antimicrobial prophylaxis that includes antistaphylococcal activity is recommended at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation to reduce infection-related complications. There continues to be wide variability in surgical infection prophylaxis (SIP) regimens among implantation centers. The aim of this study is to characterize current SIP regimens at different LVAD centers. METHODS: A survey study was conducted from 26 September 2017 to 25 October 2017. Surveys were distributed electronically to LVAD coordinators and infectious diseases specialists at 75 US medical centers identified as having an LVAD program. Data collection included information about antimicrobial selection, duration, Staphylococcus aureus screening, and decolonization procedures. RESULTS: We received 29 survey responses. The majority of surveys were completed by infectious diseases physicians (72.4% [21 out of 29]). Most responding centers reported LVAD programs established for greater than 10 years (20 out of 29 [69%]). Cardiac transplantation was performed in 28 out of 29 (96%) centers. Of centers reporting a defined SIP regimen for non-penicillin allergic patients (96% [28 out of 29]), 17.9% (5 out of 28) reported a four-drug regimen, 35.7% (10 out of 28) reported a three-drug regimen, and 46.4% (13 out of 28) reported a two-drug regimen, while no centers reported a single-drug regimen. Empiric fluconazole was common (50% [14 out of 28]) and 96.4% (27 out of 28) of regimens included vancomycin. Duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis (24 hours to 5 days), S. aureus screening, decolonization procedures, and alterations due to drug allergies varied across participating centers. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey results indicate wide variation in SIP regimens among participating LVAD centers. These results highlight the need for studies evaluating the implications of SIP regimens, and whether clinical factors that prolong antimicrobial duration impact postoperative infection rates.

When should we measure surgical site infection in patients undergoing a craniotomy? A consideration of the current practice.

Introduction: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common postoperative complication that causes significant morbidity, particularly in patients undergoing cranial neurosurgery. The treatment of SSI can attract a significant cost by way of increasing length of stay, readmission and reoperation in some cases. Cranial neurosurgical cases without implant surgery are recommended by the centre for disease control to be surveyed for SSI for a 30-day period. The number and proportion of SSI cases that present outside of this 30-day period is unknown.Method: All cranial, neurosurgical procedures at Salford Royal Foundation NHS Trust (SRFT) between October 2011 and April 2015 (n = 3513) were identified and followed up prospectively. The number of SSIs detected, the length of time following operation, microbiological organisms cultured and the need for further neurosurgical procedure was recorded. Mean length of time from operation to detection of SSI was calculated and a hazard function analysis was undertaken.Results: Of the 3531 cases (m = 1903, f = 1628) that underwent cranial neurosurgery included in this series 86 cases of SSI were noted. The mean number of days at which SSI was first clinically diagnosed in this series was 53 days. The time period in which 75% of cases were identified to be SSI was 49 days from the date of the surgical procedure, with 32 cases (37%) presenting outside of the 30-day period of surveillance. Over half of cases required some degree of operative intervention to treat SSI.Conclusion: A longer period of surveillance in cranial neurosurgical procedures is likely to detect a truer rate of SSI in addition to the identification of a notable number of cases that require surgical intervention. We recommend a period of at at least 50 days.

Surgical site infections: Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice.

These guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation review the diagnosis, prevention, and management of post-operative surgical site infections (SSIs) in solid organ transplantation. SSIs are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in SOT recipients. Depending on the organ transplanted, SSIs occur in 3%-53% of patients, with the highest rates observed in small bowel/multivisceral, liver, and pancreas transplant recipients. These infections are classified by increasing invasiveness as superficial incisional, deep incisional, or organ/space SSIs. The spectrum of organisms implicated in SSIs in SOT recipients is more diverse than the general population due to other important factors such as the underlying end-stage organ failure, immunosuppression, prolonged hospitalizations, organ transportation/preservation, and previous exposures to antibiotics in donors and recipients that could predispose to infections with multidrug-resistant organisms. In this guideline, we describe the epidemiology, clinical presentation, differential diagnosis, potential pathogens, and management. We also provide recommendations for the selection, dosing, and duration of peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis to minimize post-operative SSIs.

Qualitative outcomes of Clean Cut: implementation lessons from reducing surgical infections in Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: Clean Cut is a six month, multi-modal, adaptive intervention aimed at reducing surgical infections through improving six critical perioperative processes: 1) handwashing/skin preparation, 2) surgical gown/drape integrity, 3) antibiotic administration, 4) instrument sterility, 5) gauze counts, and 6) WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use. The aim of this study was to elucidate themes across Clean Cut implementation sites in Ethiopia to improve implementation at future hospitals. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews of 20 clinicians involved in Clean Cut at four hospitals. Participation was limited to Clean Cut team members and included surgeons, anesthetists, operating room (OR) nurses, ward nurses, OR managers, quality improvement personnel, and hospital administrators. Audio recordings were transcribed and coded using qualitative software. A codebook was inductively and iteratively derived between two researchers, tested for inter-rater reliability, and applied to all transcripts. We conducted thematic analysis to derive our final qualitative results. RESULTS: The interviews revealed barriers and facilitators to the implementation of Clean Cut, as well as strategies for future implementation sites. Key barriers included material resource limitations, feelings of job burden, existing gaps in infection prevention education, and communication errors during data collection. Common facilitators included strong hospital leadership support, commitment to improved patient outcomes, and organized Clean Cut training sessions. Future strategies include resource assessments, creating a sense of responsibility among staff, targeted training sessions, and incorporating new standards into daily routine. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study highlight the importance of engaging hospital leadership, providers and staff in quality improvement programs, and understanding their work contexts. The identified barriers and facilitators will inform future initiatives in the field of perioperative infection prevention.

Urinary microbes and postoperative urinary tract infection risk in urogynecologic surgical patients.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Women have a 20% risk of developing a urinary tract infection (UTI) following urogynecologic surgery. This study assessed the association of postoperative UTI with bacteria in preoperative samples of catheterized urine. METHODS: Immediately before surgery, vaginal swabs, perineal swabs, and catheterized urine samples were collected, and the V4 region of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene was sequenced. The cohort was dichotomized in two ways: (1) standard day-of-surgery urine culture result (positive/negative), and (2) occurrence of postoperative UTI (positive/negative). Characteristics of bladder, vaginal, and perineal microbiomes were assessed to identify factors associated with postoperative UTI. RESULTS: Eighty-seven percent of the 104 surgical patients with pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence (POP/UI) were white; mean age was 57 years. The most common genus was Lactobacillus, with a mean relative abundance of 39.91% in catheterized urine, 53.88% in vaginal swabs, and 30.28% in perineal swabs. Two distinct clusters, based on dispersion of catheterized urine (i.e., bladder) microbiomes, had highly significant (p < 2.2-16) differences in age, microbes, and postoperative UTI risk. Postoperative UTI was most frequently associated with the bladder microbiome; microbes in adjacent pelvic floor niches also contributed to UTI risk. UTI risk was associated with depletion of Lactobacillus iners and enrichment of a diverse mixture of uropathogens. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative UTI risk appears to be associated with preoperative bladder microbiome composition, where an abundance of L. iners appears to protect against postoperative UTI.

[Rationale for the application of surface-enhanced Raman scattering for identification of main pathogens of purulent-inflammatory diseases in maxillofacial area]. / Obosnovanie primeneniia éffekta gigantskogo ramanovskogo rasseianiia dlia identifikatsii osnovnykh vozbuditelei gnoino-vospalitel'nykh protsessov cheliustno-litsevoi oblasti.

The objective of the research was to elaborate experimental-theoretical and clinic-bacteriological rationale for the application of laser diagnostic for identification of main pathogens of purulent-inflammatory processes in maxillofacial area. For germs identification by giant Raman scattering effect SERS-substrate with nano silver metallic balls, reference strains (Ps. aeruginosa 27853 and S. aureus 25923) and clinical cultures of Staphylococcus, Bacillus and Escherichia coli were used. Using an example of purulent inflammation pathogens we considered that each of bacterial species is characterized by individual spectral lines of Raman scattering, which allows to identify them in short term (1-2 min). Moreover the proposed method is highly sensitive (105-106 CFU/ml). Creation of germs library and device portability makes use of laser diagnostic for express-indication purulent infections possible directly in clinical conditions. Thus, analytical capability, quick result, high sensitivity and peculiarity, economical effectiveness due to lack of necessity to use growth medium and to transport it to microbiological lab gives an opportunity to consider laser diagnostic as a perspective universal express-method of clinical microbiology.

Novel Method Suggests Global Superiority of Short-Duration Antibiotics for Intra-abdominal Infections.

Desirability of outcome ranking and response adjusted for duration of antibiotic risk (DOOR/RADAR) are novel and innovative methods of evaluating data in antibiotic trials. We analyzed data from a noninferiority trial of short-course antimicrobial therapy for intra-abdominal infection (STOP-IT), and results suggest global superiority of short-duration therapy for intra-abdominal infections.

"Neo-PIRO": Introducing a Novel Grading System for Surgical Infections of Neonates.

INTRODUCTION: Quantification of surgical sepsis was never done beyond superficial, subfascial, and deep surgical site infection (SSI). Invasive surgical sepsis with systemic manifestation has not been tried to be quantified in general and pediatric surgery in particular. Hence, this attempts to develop a novel grading system to quantify neonatal surgical infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Predisposing factors, infection, response, and organ failure (PIRO) is being used in critical care institutions for medical sepsis; it was modified with neonate-specific surgical parameters. Authors have developed a grading of these parameters into Grade I, II, and III. RESULTS: A blinded statistical test was performed and results were put to test. Extended Mantel-Haenszel Chi-square test validated linear relationship with grade and outcome, hospital stay, deep SSI, and organ dysfunction. Analysis of variance also showed the significant relationship of changing trends in grade and outcome. (1) Higher the grade indicated the probability of death. (2) Grade I patients had less duration of hospital stay compared to Grade II and III (P = 0.04). (3) The requirement of organ support and SSI were also more in Grade III. (4) Grade I patients had less increase in trends compared to Grade II and III (F = 4.86). Authors therefore feel Neo-PIRO seems to be the first scoring system that shows a linear relationship between scores and grade. CONCLUSION: Neo-PIRO is a novel grading system with surgical neonate-specific parameters. Future versions to include molecular parameters, as well as parameters selected by regression analysis.

Infection control in colon surgery.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive review of strategies that should be employed in the prevention of infection at the surgical site in patients undergoing colon surgery. METHODS: The world's literature on the pathogenesis and prevention of infections at the surgical site in colon resection were reviewed to identify those methods that are associated with improved rates of infection at the surgical site. The pathogenesis, microbiology, diagnosis, and surveillance of surgical site infection have been reviewed in the context of better understanding the accepted methods for prevention. Recommendations are provided based upon evidence-based information when available. RESULTS: Surgical site infection rates in colon surgery have been reduced consistently over the last 60 years of surgical practice. Preoperative and intraoperative techniques are described which have been useful in this improvement, while postoperative methods including the extension of postoperative systemic antibiotics have not been of value. CONCLUSIONS: Many methods have been demonstrated to improve surgical site infection rates in colon surgery. However, consistent and standardized applications of these principals in prevention currently do not exist. Application of evidence-based practices can further reduce the morbidity and cost of infection following colon surgery.

Impact of antibiotic stewardship on perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE: Antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) is useful to prevent antimicrobial overuse, misuse and abuse, as well against the occurrence of surgical site infections (SSIs). This study aimed to describe the implementation of a quality improvement intervention on AP for elective surgery, as informal interviews showed a lower than expected compliance with internal recommendations, and to evaluate intervention's effect in terms of main drug consumption. DESIGN: A quality improvement intervention on all elective cases within 14 main surgical departments was performed. SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines were used in designing and reporting. SETTING: The intervention was implemented in an Italian Teaching Hospital 2 years after the adoption of internal evidence-based AP recommendations. PARTICIPANTS: Professionals involved in elective surgery. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention was structured into two phases: a survey was conducted during two non-consecutive weeks period (April-May 2013) to assess the adherence to the international guidelines in AP; survey's results were presented and discussed with all the surgical teams (December 2013-April 2014). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Impact on cefazolin consumption (in defined daily doses per 100 procedures). RESULTS: Data of AP for 653 surgical procedures in terms of type, timing, duration, excess and defect were analyzed. An optimal AP rate resulted in 48.1% cases. Reduction in cefazolin use (-21.5%) and cost (-22.9%) was registered. CONCLUSIONS: Though results cannot be generalized to all hospital populations, the implemented intervention is likely to improve AP consequently improving quality of care and reducing costs. Further studies are needed to evaluate specific outcomes such as rate of SSIs and antibiotic resistance.