RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Estimated blood loss (EBL) is an important part of the perioperative process. This project aims to determine the accuracy of perioperative team members to estimate blood volume on drapes and the operating room floor. METHODS: Aliquots of unused human blood were used to create surgical scenarios, and standardized pictures and videos were taken. Physicians, residents, nurses, medical students, and surgical technicians were surveyed and asked to estimate the blood volume for each series. Accuracy and consistency of responses was analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred and forty five responses were recorded: 57 attending physicians, 36 residents, 27 registered nurses, 17 medical students, and seven circulating surgical techs. Median percent error (PE) for all cases was 211.11%, demonstrating a global overestimation of blood volume. PE for the 150 mL images was statistically significantly lower than that of the 50 and 100 mL images. Circulating Surgical Technicians were the most accurate group, with a median PE of 125%, followed closely by Medical Students (PE = 158.33%). The most accurate specialty was Orthopedics (PE = 168.06%). The least accurate groups were Attending Physicians (PE = 286.11%) and General surgery (GSGY) (PE = 327.78%). The most accurate orthopedic surgery and GSGY subspecialties were Hand (PE = 237.64%) and Vascular (PE = 108.33%), respectively. Statistical analyses showed no significant differences by clinical role, surgical specialty, or subspecialty. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a global overestimation of blood volume when using the visual method, with improved accuracy at higher volumes. Our findings highlight the limitations of visual estimation methods for EBL.
Assuntos
Salas Cirúrgicas , Humanos , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Volume Sanguíneo , Competência ClínicaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: French medical graduates undertake a national examination at the end of their studies with a subsequent national ranking. Specialty is then chosen by each candidate according to their ranking. This study aims to describe the attractiveness of surgical specialties and the evolution of the male-female distribution among French medical graduates (FMG) from 2017 to 2022. METHODS: Our database included the candidates' ranking, sex and choice of specialty from 2017 to 2022. It included all French medical graduates from 2017 to 2022 and all French medical schools. A linear regression was performed to predict future trends. Dependent variables were mean rankings and the percentage of women. The independent variable was year of application. A Pearson correlation was performed to examine any relationship with mean workweek. RESULTS: A total number of 5270 residents chose a surgical programme between 2017 and 2022. The number of residents who were assigned their desired surgical programme held stable at 878 surgical residents per year. Plastic and reconstructive surgery remained the most frequently chosen surgical programme. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery was the least frequently chosen surgical programme between 2017 and 2022. The mean ranking for a candidate choosing a surgical programme rose significantly by 9% from 2017 to 2022 (p < 0.01). Neurosurgery exhibited the greatest fall as a surgical specialty as its rankings decreased by 163.6% (p < 0.01). Maxillo-facial surgery was the only specialty with a statistically significant increase in its rankings by 35.9% (p < 0.05). The overall proportion of women was 51.1%. Obstetrics-and-gynecology was the highest represented specialty among female candidates, with a mean of 83.9% of women. Orthopedic surgery was the lowest represented, being composed of a mean of 28.6% of women. The number of female surgical residents increased significantly over the six-year period, by 7.6% (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: More and more medical school graduates decide not to choose surgery for their residency programme. Some specialties continue to be attractive while many are losing their appeal. While there does appear to be progress towards gender equity, further investigation is necessary to assess its actual implementation.
Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Obstetrícia , Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Escolha da Profissão , Especialização , Identidade de GêneroRESUMO
PURPOSE: ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) protocols are designed to optimize perioperative care and expedite recovery. Historically, complete primary repair of bladder exstrophy has included postoperative recovery in the intensive care unit and extended length of stay. We hypothesized that instituting ERAS principles would benefit children undergoing complete primary repair of bladder exstrophy, decreasing length of stay. We describe implementation of a complete primary repair of bladder exstrophy-ERAS pathway at a single, freestanding children's hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multidisciplinary team developed an ERAS pathway for complete primary repair of bladder exstrophy, which launched in June 2020 and included a new surgical approach that divided the lengthy procedure into 2 consecutive operative days. The complete primary repair of bladder exstrophy-ERAS pathway was continuously refined, and the final pathway went into effect in May 2021. Post-ERAS patient outcomes were compared with a pre-ERAS historical cohort (2013-2020). RESULTS: A total of 30 historical and 10 post-ERAS patients were included. All post-ERAS patients had immediate extubation (P = .04) and 90% received early feeding (P < .001). The median intensive care unit and overall length of stay decreased from 2.5 to 1 days (P = .005) and from 14.5 to 7.5 days (P < .001), respectively. After final pathway implementation, there was no intensive care unit use (n=4). Postoperatively, no ERAS patient required escalation of care, and there was no difference in emergency department visits or readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Applying ERAS principles to complete primary repair of bladder exstrophy was associated with decreased variations in care, improved patient outcomes, and effective resource utilization. Although ERAS has typically been utilized for high-volume procedures, our study highlights that an enhanced recovery pathway is both feasible and adaptable to less common urological surgeries.
Assuntos
Extrofia Vesical , Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada , Criança , Humanos , Extrofia Vesical/cirurgia , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Tempo de Internação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The transition to consultant practice represents an important transition from the role of trainee to trainer. We used the theoretical framework of Threshold Concepts to better understand this transition by analysing data from a broader qualitative study examining the experience of early career Certified Gynaecological Oncologists (CGOs) in Australia and New Zealand. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with CGOs of <5 years consultant experience. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, sensitised by the theoretical framework of Threshold Concepts. RESULTS: Seven early career CGOs were interviewed. Analysis resulted in the construction of five main themes related to the trainer role, each demonstrating characteristics of Threshold Concepts: 'Part of becoming and being a consultant'; 'Managing complex work environments and training responsibilities'; 'Optimising near peer relationships'; 'Recency informing evolution of training'; and "'Being responsible and letting go ' - the next transition." DISCUSSION: The themes offer insights into the areas of the transition to trainer that are troublesome, the impact of negotiating these challenges on professional identity formation, and the strategies used by CGOs to negotiate them. Using the lens of Threshold Concepts, these experiences can be normalised, and supported through efforts to facilitate the development of skills in reflection, feedback, coaching and mentorship.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of literature evaluating research-funding differences between male and female surgeons. Our study aims to evaluate possible disparities in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant awards by surgeon gender, type of medical degree (MD/DO), and advanced degrees among six surgery specialties: general surgeons, neurosurgeons, urologists, obstetricians/gynecologists, plastic, and orthopedic surgeons, from 2015 to 2020. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed investigating the number of NIH grants received by male and female surgeon-scientists overall and within each listed specialty, 2015-2020. As a surrogate for grants submitted, the proportion of active surgeon-scientists per specialty was used. A priori level of significance was defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS: After adjusting for confounders, male surgeons had a higher mean number of NIH grants and higher grant funding than female surgeons (P < 0.001 for both). Type of medical degree (MD/DO) was not significantly associated with NIH funding. An advanced degree was associated with NIH funding among neurosurgeons only (P < 0.05). Differences in the proportion of active surgeon-scientists and proportion of NIH grants received by male and female surgeon-scientists were found only in the fields of orthopedic surgery (5.8% female surgeons and received 20.7% of grants, P = 0.003) and plastic surgery (17.2% female surgeons and received 33.3% of grants, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Male surgeons received most of the total surgical NIH grants. However, funding for female surgeons in orthopedic and plastic surgery outpaces that of their male counterparts when compared to gender proportions in their respective field. Future studies should further investigate the effects of additional applicant demographics on securing NIH grant funding.
Assuntos
Distinções e Prêmios , Pesquisa Biomédica , Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Cirurgiões , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing numbers of female medical students, surgery remains male-dominated. PURPOSE: To highlight the principal career obstacles experienced by aspiring female surgeons. METHODS: A narrative review of literature on the position and career barriers of female surgeons has been conducted, using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. MAIN FINDINGS: Implicit and even explicit biases against female surgeons remain prevalent, negatively impacting their training performance and overall professional trajectory. Female surgeons are globally underrepresented in leadership positions and senior academic rankings, especially that of a full professor. They feel hampered by lack of effective mentorship, whose value for a successful career has been acknowledged by all medical students, surgeons and surgical leaders. Their work-life imbalance is sometimes expressed as lower likelihood than their male contemporaries of getting married or having children and may be attributed to their conventional association with the role of caretaker, their personal desire to accommodate occupational and family duties and the inadequate implementation of parental leave and childcare policies. Female surgeons' "infertility" may be further explained by direct and indirect pregnancy-related difficulties. Female surgeons are also financially undercompensated compared to their male contemporaries. Finally, specialty-specific challenges should not be overlooked. CONCLUSIONS: While encouraging steps have been made, women in surgery feel still hindered by various obstacles. The qualitative, interview-based nature of current literature requires more meticulous studies on these barriers with a more quantitative and objective approach. Attenuation of gender imbalance in surgical specialties requires further changes in mentality and more targeted modifications in relevant policies.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Geral , Médicas , Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Cirurgiões , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Escolha da Profissão , Criança , Feminino , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidez , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/educaçãoRESUMO
Recent advancements in surgical training methods have escalated the need for simulators. The EyeSi simulation has played a major role in Ophthalmology training by providing opportunity to the novice residents to grasp the surgical steps of the procedure and master the skill by repeated attempts. Participants were assessed on single level of cataract module and their consecutive scores were assessed with each attempt. It was found that repetitive practice on simulator can help develop proficiency in the desired steps that can ultimately prepare the surgical trainees for real life surgery.
Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Oftalmologia , Competência Clínica , Simulação por Computador , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/métodos , Humanos , Oftalmologia/educaçãoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Prior work suggests women surgical role models attract more female medical students into surgical training. We investigate recent trends of women in surgical society leadership and national conference moderator and plenary speaker roles. METHODS: Gender distribution was surveyed at 15 major surgical societies and 14 conferences from 2014 to 2018 using publicly reported data. Roles were categorized as leadership (executive council), moderator, or plenary speaker. Data were cross-checked from online profiles and by contacting societies. Logistic regression with Huber-White clustering by society was utilized to evaluate proportions of women in each role over time and determine associations between the proportion of women in executive leadership, and scientific session moderators and plenary speakers. RESULTS: The proportion of leadership positions held by women increased slightly from 2014 to 2018 (20.6%-26.6%, P = 0.23), as did the proportion of moderators (26.2%-30.6%, P = 0.027) and plenary speakers (26.2%-30.9%, P = 0.058). The proportion of women in each role varied significantly across societies (all P < 0.001): leaders (range 0.0%-52.0%), moderators (12.5%-58.8%), and plenary speakers (11.3%-60.0%). Three patterns of change were observed: eight societies (53.3%) demonstrated increases in representation of women over time, four societies (26.6%) showed stable moderate-to-good gender balance, and three societies (20.0%) had consistent underrepresentation of women. CONCLUSION: There is significant variability in the representation of women at the leadership level of national surgical societies and participating at national surgical conferences as moderators and plenary speakers. Over the past 5 years some societies have achieved advances in gender equity, but many societies still have substantial room for improvement.
Assuntos
Congressos como Assunto/organização & administração , Equidade de Gênero , Liderança , Médicas/organização & administração , Sexismo/tendências , Sociedades Médicas/organização & administração , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/organização & administração , Congressos como Assunto/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Médicas/tendências , Sociedades Médicas/tendências , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/tendências , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gender diversity in health teams is associated with better productivity. As women's participation in surgery has been growing, it is important to improve knowledge about the elements that guide their professional development. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to outline the demographic and professional features of female vascular surgeons in Brazil. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was designed, in which a questionnaire was made available online for 60 days. Invitations to participate were distributed by institutional e-mail sent from the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery (SBACV) to associate women surgeons. Results are presented as numbers and percentages. Odds ratios and chi-square tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: From a total of 810 invitations sent out, 281 questionnaires were completed. The most prevalent age groups were 25-35 years (n = 115) and 36-45 years (n = 114). Among those who worked exclusively in the private sector, 79.8% had at least one board certification (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.65-0.89; p = 0.001). Regarding workload distribution, 64.4% and 34.2% reported that they spend more time in the clinic and hospital, respectively. Respondents with more years of experience reported a predominance of office practice (p = 0.002). Although 67.3% (n = 189) had published scientific papers, 68% (n = 191) had never held leadership roles. CONCLUSIONS: The study respondents consisted of highly qualified women surgeons with respect to training, certification, and scientific engagement, but they remain underrepresented in professional management positions. Surgical societies and health institutions should act to promote inclusive and diverse leadership.
CONTEXTO: A diversidade de gênero em equipes médicas está associada a uma melhor produtividade. Com o aumento da participação feminina na cirurgia, é importante conhecer melhor os elementos que orientam o desenvolvimento dessas profissionais. OBJETIVOS: Delinear as características demográficas e profissionais das cirurgiãs vasculares no Brasil. MÉTODOS: Estudo de caráter transversal, em que foi disponibilizado um questionário on-line por 60 dias. O convite foi enviado pelo e-mail institucional da Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV) às cirurgiãs associadas. Os resultados são apresentados como números e porcentagens. Os testes de odds ratio (OR) e do qui-quadrado foram utilizados para a análise. RESULTADOS: De 810 convites enviados, 281 questionários foram respondidos. Os grupos etários predominantes foram 25-35 anos (n = 115) e 36-45 anos (n = 114). Entre as que trabalhavam exclusivamente no setor privado, 79,8% possuíam ao menos um Título de Especialista (OR: 0,76; intervalo de confiança de 95% 0,65-0,89; p = 0,001). Em relação à distribuição da carga horária, 64,4% e 34,2% relataram que passavam mais tempo no ambulatório e no hospital, respectivamente. Entre as com mais anos de experiência, houve predomínio da prática em consultório (p = 0,002). Embora 67,3% (n = 189) tenham publicado artigos científicos, 68% (n = 191) nunca ocuparam cargos de liderança. CONCLUSÕES: As participantes do estudo consistiram em cirurgiãs altamente qualificadas em relação a treinamento, certificação e engajamento científico. No entanto, permanecem pouco representadas em cargos de gestão profissional. As sociedades cirúrgicas e as instituições de saúde devem agir para promover uma liderança inclusiva e diversa.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of the current research was to investigate the unplanned readmission rates and identify the risk factors of unplanned readmissions in pediatric general surgical specialties. METHODS: A retrospective review of unplanned readmissions following initial surgery from July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2017, in the general surgical specialties at an academic tertiary care hospital was performed. The main outcome of interest was unplanned readmission rates, the common causes for readmission. The risk factors involved in the unplanned readmissions were further investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Of the 3263 patients who underwent surgery and discharge, 176 (9%) were unplanned readmissions. The most frequent surgical operation related to readmission was appendectomy, and the common readmission causes were associated with treatment of gastrointestinal complaints/complications. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that emergency surgery (p = 0.016, odds ratio [OR] = 2.73; 95% CI = 1.35-6.19), major complications (p = 0.042, OR = 2.43; 95% CI = 1.12-4.71) and the initial hospital length of stay (p = 0.036, OR = 3.46; 95% CI = 1.67-7.53) were independent risk factors for readmission. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified potential risks for readmission, which should be targeted for interventions to improve quality and resource allocation.
Assuntos
Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Análise de Variância , Apendicectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Emergências , Feminino , Gastroenteropatias/complicações , Gastroenteropatias/epidemiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Centros de Atenção TerciáriaRESUMO
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the geographic distribution of hand surgeons in the United States. We assessed the states and congressional districts (CDs) for optimal numbers of surgeons, determined whether there is an even distribution, and identified factors influencing practice location. Hand surgeon practice location data from the American Association for Hand Surgery and American Society for Surgery of the Hand (2015) and both state and CD population data from the US Census (2014) were assessed. CDs each contain approximately the same population. Furthermore, select hand surgeons were asked to fill out a survey to identify how 6 factors influence practice location. A total of 2,707 American Association for Hand Surgery active and American Society for Surgery of the Hand active and candidate US members were included. The mean number of hand surgeons per state was 53 (range: 3-298). The most hand surgeons were in California, Texas, New York, and Florida and least were in Wyoming and Alaska. There were 16, 11, and 24 states with suboptimal, optimal, and greater-than-optimal density, respectively. There were 436 CDs. We found 231, 30, and 175 CDs with suboptimal, optimal, and greater-than-optimal density, respectively. There were weak correlations between hand surgeons and CD populations and between CD population densities and CD hand surgeons per capita. Twenty hand surgeons were included in the survey resulting in no difference of any 1 factor compared with the other 5 factors. There was a difference in the factor "population size" between hand surgeons from greater-than-optimal and suboptimal CDs. The findings of our study indicate that hand surgeon proportions do not correlate with population proportions, and distribution is not skewed toward areas of higher population density. Many areas are not optimally served, and hand surgeons may be choosing where to practice based on a combination of factors beyond population need.
Assuntos
Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/provisão & distribuição , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Área de Atuação Profissional/estatística & dados numéricos , Comportamento de Escolha , Humanos , Área Carente de Assistência Médica , Densidade Demográfica , Sociedades Médicas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients have about seven medical consultations a year. Despite the importance of medical interviews in the healthcare process, there is no generic instrument to assess patients' experiences in general practices, medical specialties, and surgical specialties. The main objective was to validate a questionnaire assessing patients' experiences with medical consultations in various practices. METHOD: The G-MISS study was a prospective multi-center trial that enrolled patients from May to July 2016. A total of 2055 patients were included from general practices, medical specialties, and surgical specialties. Patients filled out a questionnaire assessing various aspects of their experience and satisfaction within 1 week after their medical interview. The validation process relied on item response theory. Internal validity was examined using exploratory factorial analysis. The statistical model used the root mean square error of approximation, confirmatory fit index, and standard root mean square residual as fit indices. Scalability and reliability were assessed with the Rasch model and Cronbach's alpha coefficients, respectively. Scale properties across the three subgroups were explored with differential item functioning. RESULTS: The G-MISS final questionnaire contained 16 items, structured in three dimensions of patients' experiences: "Relief", "Communication", and "Compliance". A global index of patients' experiences was computed as the mean of the dimension scores. All fit indices from the statistical model were satisfactory (RMSEA = 0.03, CFI = 0.98, SRMR = 0.06). The overall scalability had a good fit to the Rasch model. Each dimension was reliable, with Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.73 to 0.86. Differential item functioning across the three consultation settings was negligible. Patients undergoing medical or surgical specialties reported higher scores in the "Relief" dimension compared with general practice (83.0 ± 11.6 or 82.4 ± 11.6 vs. 73.2 ± 16.7; P < .001). A consultation shorter than 5 min correlated with low patient satisfaction in "Relief" and "Communication" and in the global index, P < .001. CONCLUSIONS: The G-MISS questionnaire is a valid and reliable questionnaire for assessing patients' experiences after consultations with general practitioners, medical specialists, and surgical specialists. The multidimensional structure relies on item response theory and assesses different aspects of patients' experiences that could be useful in clinical practice and research settings.
Assuntos
Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapêutico , Medicina Geral , Satisfação Pessoal , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cooperação do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and severity of dry eye syndrome in a group of Mexican residents of different surgical specialties. METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study where the residents were studied using the Ocular Surface Disease Index, together with diagnostic tests for dry eye syndrome, such as tear breakup time, Oxford Schema, Schirmer's test I, and meibomian gland dysfunction testing. Statistical analyses were performed by Pearson's chi-squared test for categorical variables and student's t-test for quantitative variables. Any P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-three residents were included (246 eyes); 90 (73 %) were male and 33 (27 %) were female. The mean age was 27.8 ± 2.1 years. A higher number of residents with dry eye syndrome was found in the cardiothoracic surgery (75 %) and otorhinolaryngology (71 %) specialties; 70 % of them reported ocular symptoms, with teardrop quality involvement in >50 % of them. CONCLUSIONS: We found a prevalence of 56 % for mild-to-moderate/severe stages of the condition. Their presence in the operating room predisposes surgical residents to dry eye syndrome because of environmental conditions.
Assuntos
Síndromes do Olho Seco/epidemiologia , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Estudos Transversais , Síndromes do Olho Seco/diagnóstico , Síndromes do Olho Seco/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Glândulas Tarsais/metabolismo , México/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Lágrimas/metabolismoRESUMO
Background and Objective: Telemedicine and video consultation are crucial advancements in healthcare, allowing remote delivery of care. Telemedicine, encompassing various technologies like wearable devices, mobile health, and telemedicine, plays a significant role in managing illnesses and promoting wellness. The corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic accelerated the adoption of telemedicine, ensuring convenient access to medical services while maintaining physical distance. Legislation has supported its integration into clinical practice and addressed compensation issues. However, ensuring clinical appropriateness and sustainability of telemedicine post-expansion has gained attention. We south to identify the most friendly and resistant specialties to telemedicine and to understand areas of interest within those specialties to grasp potential barriers to its use. Methods: We aimed to identify articles that incorporated telemedicine in any medical or surgical specialty and determine the adoption rate and intent of this new form of care. Additionally, a secondary search within these databases was conducted to analyze the advantages, disadvantages, and implementation of telemedicine in the healthcare system. Non-English articles and those without full text were excluded. The study selection and data collection process involved using search terms such as "medicine", "surgery", "specialties", "telemedicine", and "telemedicine". Key Content and Findings: Telemedicine adoption varies among specialties. The pandemic led to increased usage, with telemedicine consultations comprising 30.1% of all visits, but specialties like mental health, gastroenterology, and endocrinology showed higher rates of adoption compared to optometry, physical therapy, and orthopedic surgery. Conclusions: The data shows that telemedicine uptake varies by specialty and condition due to the need for physical exams. In-person visits still dominate new patient visits despite increased telemedicine use. Telemedicine cannot fully replace in-person care but has increased visit volume and is secure. The adoption of telemedicine is higher in medical practices than in surgical practices, with neurosurgery and urology leading. Further research is needed to assess telemedicine's suitability and effectiveness in different specialties and conditions.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: This study aims to evaluate program signaling in surgical specialties, analyze its influence on residency applications, and provide recommendations for enhancing its consistency and effectiveness. METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed AAMC ERAS data from the 2021 to 2022 and 2023 residency match cycles, focusing on surgical specialties including general surgery, neurological surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, and orthopedic surgery. RESULTS: A positive correlation existed between the number of signals received and the number of applicants to a program across 4 surgical specialties. 10% of programs in each specialty received between 17% and 28% of all signals. There was a negative correlation between the number of current DO residents at a program and the number of signals received. Amongst surgical specialties, those with more signals per applicant had a more equitable distribution of signals across competitive programs. University programs received the most signals, programs were less likely to receive signals if they had a higher percentage of DO residents, and IMG applicants were less likely to send signals. CONCLUSION: Specialties with more signals per applicant had a more equitable distribution of signals across competitive programs, and university programs received proportionally more signals than community programs. Further research is required to investigate the disparities in signaling and the impact of signaling on successful matching.
Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/educação , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Seleção de Pessoal/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Background: Large language models (LLMs) represent a recent advancement in artificial intelligence with medical applications across various healthcare domains. The objective of this review is to highlight how LLMs can be utilized by clinicians and surgeons in their everyday practice. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Six databases were searched to identify relevant articles. Eligibility criteria emphasized articles focused primarily on clinical and surgical applications of LLMs. Results: The literature search yielded 333 results, with 34 meeting eligibility criteria. All articles were from 2023. There were 14 original research articles, four letters, one interview, and 15 review articles. These articles covered a wide variety of medical specialties, including various surgical subspecialties. Conclusions: LLMs have the potential to enhance healthcare delivery. In clinical settings, LLMs can assist in diagnosis, treatment guidance, patient triage, physician knowledge augmentation, and administrative tasks. In surgical settings, LLMs can assist surgeons with documentation, surgical planning, and intraoperative guidance. However, addressing their limitations and concerns, particularly those related to accuracy and biases, is crucial. LLMs should be viewed as tools to complement, not replace, the expertise of healthcare professionals.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: As large language models receive greater attention in medical research, the investigation of ethical considerations is warranted. This review aims to explore surgery literature to identify ethical concerns surrounding these artificial intelligence models and evaluate how autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice are represented within these ethical discussions to provide insights in order to guide further research and practice. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Five electronic databases were searched in October 2023. Eligible studies included surgery-related articles that focused on large language models and contained adequate ethical discussion. Study details, including specialty and ethical concerns, were collected. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 1179 articles, with 53 meeting the inclusion criteria. Plastic surgery, orthopedic surgery, and neurosurgery were the most represented surgical specialties. Autonomy was the most explicitly cited ethical principle. The most frequently discussed ethical concern was accuracy (n = 45, 84.9%), followed by bias, patient confidentiality, and responsibility. CONCLUSION: The ethical implications of using large language models in surgery are complex and evolving. The integration of these models into surgery necessitates continuous ethical discourse to ensure responsible and ethical use, balancing technological advancement with human dignity and safety.
RESUMO
Despite its role in treating the most dominant non-communicable diseases worldwide, the global workforce of oral and maxillofacial (OM) surgeons is not well-characterized. To address the current deficit in understanding of the global OM surgeon workforce and to elevate oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) in the global health discourse, we join other surgical specialties in evaluating global surgical capacity with a descriptive analysis of the distribution of OM surgeons worldwide. A mixed-methods study was implemented using a combination of literature review, in-country contacts, internet searches, and survey data. The survey was distributed globally from January to June 2022. Data regarding OM surgeon workforce estimates were obtained for 104 of 195 United Nations-recognized countries (53.3%). Among countries with available estimates, the median global workforce density was 0.518 OM surgeons per 100,000 population. Twenty-eight countries (26.9%) were reported to have two or fewer OM surgeons. The median OM surgeon workforce density for low-income countries was 0.015 surgeons per 100,000 population, compared to 1.087 surgeons per 100,000 population in high-income countries. low and middle-income countries countries have the least workforce density as well as the least data coverage. More work is needed to better understand the capacity of the global OM surgeon workforce and access to OMS care.
RESUMO
Evidence-informed data may help students matching into competitive residency programs guide curricular activities, extracurricular activities, and residency career choices. We aimed to examine the characteristics of students applying to competitive surgical residencies and identify predictors of matching success. We identified the five lowest match rates for the surgical subspecialities listed in the 2020 National Resident Matching Program report to define a surgical residency as competitive. We analyzed a database from 115 United States medical schools regarding application data from 2017 to 2020. Multilevel logistic regression was used to determine predictors of matching. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.A total of 1,448 medical students submitted 25,549 applications. The five most competitive specialties included were plastic surgery (N = 172), otolaryngology (N = 342), neurological surgery (N = 163), vascular surgery (N = 52), orthopedic surgery (N = 679), and thoracic surgery (N = 40). We found that medical students with a geographical connection (adjusted OR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.41 to 1.93]), and students who did an away rotation at the applied program (adjusted OR, 3.22 [95% CI, 2.75 to 3.78]) had statistically significantly increased odds of matching into a competitive surgical specialty. Furthermore, we found that students with a United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score below 230 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) score below 240 had increased odds of matching if they completed an away rotation at the applied program. Completing an away rotation and geographical connection to the institution may contribute more than academic criteria for selection into a competitive surgical residency after an interview. This finding may be due to less variation in academic criteria among this pool of high-performing medical students. Students with limited resources who apply to a competitive surgical specialty may be at a disadvantage given the financial burden of an away rotation.