Temporary pacing through umbilical venous route for neonatal heart failure due to complete atrioventricular block.

We present a case of a neonate who presented with worsening heart failure due to congenital complete atrioventricular (AV) block, secondary to maternal anti Ro/SSA and anti-LA/SSB antibodies. The patient was implanted a temporary pacemaker in view of hemodynamic deterioration and subsequently was weaned off ionotropic support and referred for permanent epicardial pacemaker implantation. We report temporary pacemaker implantation in a neonate with hemodynamic instability as a stabilizing measure and discuss technical challenges for the same.

Treatment strategy for acute myocarditis in pediatric patients requiring emergency intervention.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute myocarditis present with a wide range of symptoms. Treatment strategies for pediatric patients with circulatory failure comprise extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), emergency temporary pacing, and pharmacotherapy. However, they remain controversial. ECMO is an effective treatment but gives rise to several complications; the goal is therefore to avoid excessive treatment as much as possible. We aimed to evaluate the importance of electrocardiogram findings in differentiating severity and establish an appropriate treatment strategy in pediatric patients with acute myocarditis who required emergency interventions. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled pediatric patients admitted to and treated in our hospital for acute myocarditis between April 1983 and December 2021. Patients were retrospectively divided into whether circulatory failure occurred (ECMO or temporary pacing was needed; emergency intervention group) or not (pharmacotherapy alone). RESULTS: Of the 26 pediatric patients, 11 experienced circulatory failure while 15 did not. In the circulatory failure group, six patients were treated with ECMO (ECMO group) and five patients with temporary pacing (pacing group). In the pacing group, all patients were diagnosed with complete and/or advanced atrioventricular block (CAVB and/or advanced AVB) and narrow QRS. Furthermore, these patients improved only with temporary pacing and pharmacotherapy, without requiring ECMO. Wide QRS complexes (QRS ≥ 0.12 ms) with ST-segment changes were detected on admission in five of six patients in the ECMO group and none in the pacing group (P = 0.015). Although all patients in the ECMO group experienced complications, none did in the pacing group (P < 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Regarding emergency intervention for acute myocarditis, ECMO or temporary pacing could be determined based on electrocardiogram findings, particularly wide QRS complexes with ST-segment changes on admission. It is important to promptly introduce ECMO in patients with wide QRS complexes with ST-segment changes, however, patients with CAVB and/or advanced AVB and narrow QRS could improve without undergoing ECMO. Therefore, excessive treatment should be avoided by separating ECMO from temporary pacing based on electrocardiogram findings on admission.

Bridge pacemaker with an externalized active fixation lead for pacemaker-dependent patients with device infection.

BACKGROUND: The risk of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) infection has been increasing in recent years. For pacemaker-dependent patients, a temporary pacemaker is needed before a new device can be implanted. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using a temporary pacing device with an externalized active fixation lead (bridge pacemaker) before a new device can be implanted in pacemaker-dependent patients with device infection. METHODS: All patients who were admitted to our cardiac center with CIED infection and in need of bridge pacemaker implantation from April 2013 to August 2020 were prospectively enrolled in this observational study. The medical records of all patients were collected and evaluated. All procedure-related complications were also collected. Long-term outcomes, including reinfection and death within 1 year after hospital discharge, were collected through telephone follow-ups. RESULTS: During the study period, 1050 patients underwent CIED extraction, of which 312 pacemaker-dependent patients underwent bridge pacemaker implantation. The mean age of the extracted leads was 44 ± 38.7 months. The bridge pacemakers were in use for a mean duration of 6 days. Nine patients developed procedure-related complications including pericardial tamponade, pneumothorax, peripheral venous thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism. Three patients developed complications that were related to their bridge pacemakers, including lead dislodgement, over-sensing and elevated pacing threshold. During the 1-year follow-up, it was found that four patients had developed CIED reinfection and three patients had died due to cardiac-related reasons. CONCLUSIONS: A bridge pacemaker with an externalized active fixation lead is safe and efficacious for pacemaker-dependent patients with device infection.

Cardiogenic shock with complete heart block secondary to dengue myocarditis requiring temporary pacing.

This case illustrates acute myocarditis with complete heart block in a 13-year-old teenager as a rare complication of acute dengue illness. He required urgent temporary pacing with inotropic support and antifailure medications. Complete heart block in dengue myocarditis is an acute but reversible condition. A similar presentation in a dengue-endemic country or with a history of travelling to tropical countries warrants a suspicion of dengue infection.

Leadless pacemakers in critically ill patients requiring prolonged cardiac pacing: A multicenter international study.

BACKGROUND: Temporary transvenous pacing in critically ill patients requiring prolonged cardiac pacing is associated with a high risk of complications. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of self-contained intracardiac leadless pacemaker (LPM) implantation in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients implanted with a Micra LPM during the hospitalization in an intensive care unit were retrospectively included. Inclusion criteria were: more than or equal to 1 supracaval central venous line, or a ventilation tube, or intravenous antibiotic therapy for ongoing sepsis or bacteremia. Patients with a history of the previous implantation of a pacemaker were excluded. Out of 1016 patients implanted with an LPM, 99 met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 75 years and Charlson comorbidity index 7. LPM implantation was successfully performed in 98% of cases, with a perioperative complication rate of 5%, mainly cardiac injuries. In-hospital mortality rate was 6%. No late (>30 days) device-related complication occurred, especially no infection. CONCLUSIONS: LPM appears as an acceptable alternative to conventional temporary transvenous pacing in selected critically ill patients requiring prolonged cardiac pacing, especially regarding the risk of infection.

Outcomes of temporary pacing using active fixation leads and externalized permanent pacemakers in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection and pacemaker dependency.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections is increasing. Complete device and lead removal are recommended for all patients with definite CIED system infection. In patients with pacemaker dependency, temporary pacing before reimplantation is necessary. In this study, temporary pacing using active fixation leads (TPAFL) was evaluated. METHODS: We reviewed data from consecutive patients implanted with TPAFL after transvenous lead extraction at our center between November 2014 and October 2020. RESULTS: TPAFL were placed in 334 patients. The mean age was 64.5 ± 16.4 years and 76.3% were males. Two hundred and forty (72%) were treated due to local pocket infection and 94 (28%) systemic infection. The indication for temporary pacing was sick sinus syndrome in 135 (40.4%) patients and complete or high-grade atrioventricular (AV) block in 199 (59.6%) patients. The most common access site for lead implantation was the ipsilateral subclavian or axillary vein (78.9%). A new permanent CIED was reimplanted at 10.3 ± 9.2 days (median 10, range: 2-70) after implantation of the temporary pacing. There were five (1.5%) adverse events related to the temporary pacing during hospitalization. The median follow-up duration was 23.1 months (interquartile range [IQR], 7.2-43.4 months). Only one patient (0.3%) developed recurrent CIED infection. CONCLUSION: TPAFL is safe and effective in pacemaker-dependent patients after infected CIED removal. The rate of temporary pacing-related complications, including lead dislodgment and reinfection of CIED is relatively low.

False Asystole Alarms Post-Temporary Pacemaker Placement Due to Pseudo-fusion.

An infant with congenital heart block and hemodynamically significant bradycardia underwent therapeutic temporary pacing wires placement. Post-operatively, frequent "asystole" alarms were observed on telemetry causing distress to both the family and the nursing staff. Investigation of these alarms showed that pacemaker malfunction led to monitor pseudo-malfunction. The alarms were alleviated with mindful setting of the pacemaker and telemetry monitor parameters. This case highlights the challenges of pacemaker placement and monitoring of very small infants in the intensive care setting. Awareness of these challenges would help in troubleshooting pacemaker and telemetry monitor issues.

The initial U.S. experience with the Tempo active fixation temporary pacing lead in structural heart interventions.

OBJECTIVES: This multicenter retrospective study of the initial U.S. experience evaluated the safety and efficacy of temporary cardiac pacing with the Tempo® Temporary Pacing Lead. BACKGROUND: Despite increasing use of temporary cardiac pacing with the rapid growth of structural heart procedures, temporary pacing leads have not significantly improved. The Tempo lead is a new temporary pacing lead with a soft tip intended to minimize the risk of perforation and a novel active fixation mechanism designed to enhance lead stability. METHODS: Data from 269 consecutive structural heart procedures were collected. Outcomes included device safety (absence of clinically significant cardiac perforation, new pericardial effusion, or sustained ventricular arrhythmia) and efficacy (clinically acceptable pacing thresholds with successful pace capture throughout the index procedure). Postprocedure practices and sustained lead performance were also analyzed. RESULTS: The Tempo lead was successfully positioned in the right ventricle and achieved pacing in 264 of 269 patients (98.1%). Two patients (0.8%) experienced loss of pace capture. Procedural mean pace capture threshold (PCT) was 0.7 ± 0.8 mA. There were no clinically significant perforations, pericardial effusions, or sustained device-related arrhythmias. The Tempo lead was left in place postprocedure in 189 patients (71.6%) for mean duration of 43.3 ± 0.7 hr (range 2.5-221.3 hr) with final PCT of 0.84 ± 1.04 mA (n = 80). Of these patients, 84.1% mobilized out of bed with no lead dislodgment. CONCLUSION: The Tempo lead is safe and effective for temporary cardiac pacing for structural heart procedures, provides stable peri and postprocedural pacing and allows mobilization of patients who require temporary pacing leads.

Bradyarrhythmias in patients with COVID-19: Marker of poor prognosis?

BACKGROUND: Despite descriptions of various cardiovascular manifestations in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), there is a paucity of reports of new onset bradyarrhythmias, and the clinical implications of these events are unknown. METHODS: Seven patients presented with or developed severe bradyarrhythmias requiring pacing support during the course of their COVID-19 illness over a 6-week period of peak COVID-19 incidence. A retrospective review of their presentations and clinical course was performed. RESULTS: Symptomatic high-degree heart block was present on initial presentation in three of seven patients (43%), and four patients developed sinus arrest or paroxysmal high-degree atrioventricular block. No patients in this series demonstrated left ventricular systolic dysfunction or acute cardiac injury, whereas all patients had elevated inflammatory markers. In some patients, bradyarrhythmias occurred prior to the onset of respiratory symptoms. Death from complications of COVID-19 infection occurred in 57% (4/7) patients during the initial hospitalization and in 71% (5/7) patients within 3 months of presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Despite management of bradycardia with temporary (3/7) or permanent leadless pacemakers (4/7), there was a high rate of short-term morbidity and death due to complications of COVID-19. The association between new-onset bradyarrhythmias and poor outcomes may influence management strategies for acutely ill patients with COVID-19.

Epicardial pacing wires after cardiac surgery: an Irish cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Temporary epicardial pacing wires are inserted after cardiac surgery. However, there are no international guidelines on which to base best practice regarding wire insertion or removal. METHODS: Data were collected on patients following cardiopulmonary bypass and analysed in terms of use, duration of use and complications of pacing wires after surgery. RESULTS: Wires were inserted in 164 of the 167 patients. Most (74%) did not require pacing. Patients were categorised into those who had aortic valve replacement (AVR) (n=42) and those who did not (n=122). Of the AVR group, 26% (n=11) were pacemaker dependent after surgery and 10% (n=4) required permanent pacemakers. Most pacing wires were removed by day 4. The only noted complication was delayed discharge. CONCLUSION: Unused pacing wires are normally removed on day 4, but for 77 (47%) of patients they remained in place longer. Forty patients (24%) had delayed wire removal because of a policy of wire removal during business hours only. Of these 40 patients, 27 (17% of the 77 with delayed removal) had delayed discharge as a result of our wire removal policy.

Guidewire pacing during transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a patient with complex congenital heart disease.

We present a case of temporary guidewire pacing in a patient with Fontan anatomy during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Temporary pacing was successfully achieved utilizing this method without complications. There is an increasing population of patients with complex congenital heart disease and expanding variety of transcatheter interventions. Due to limitations in vascular access and surgical anatomies, guidewire pacing may have a wide array of potential applications in pediatrics and the congenital heart disease population.

Intraoperative Implantation of Temporary Endocardial Pacing Catheter During Thoracoscopic Redo Tricuspid Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The placement of a temporary epicardial pacing wire is a challenge during a minimally invasive redo cardiac operation. The aim of this study is to assess the application of temporary endocardial pacing in patients who underwent minimally invasive redo tricuspid surgery. METHODS: Perioperative data of consecutive patients who underwent thoracoscopic redo tricuspid surgery were collected. All the tricuspid surgeries and combined procedures were performed under peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass without aortic cross-clamping. A sheath was introduced into the right jugular vein beside the percutaneous superior vena cava cannula and a temporary endocardial pacing catheter was guided into the right ventricle via the sheath prior to the right atrial closure. The pacemaker was connected and run as needed during or after operation. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients who underwent thoracoscopic redo tricuspid surgery were enrolled. Symptomatic tricuspid valve regurgitation (93.9%) and tricuspid valvular prosthesis obstruction (6.1%) after previous cardiac operations were noted as indications for a redo surgery. The mean time from previous cardiac operation to this time redo surgery was 13.3±6.4years. Isolated tricuspid valve replacement was performed in 18 patients (54.5%) and tricuspid valve plasty combined with or without mitral valve replacement was performed in 15 patients (45.5%). A temporary endocardial pacing catheter was successfully placed in the right ventricle for all patients with good sensing and pacing. No temporary pacing related complications occurred from insertion to removal of pacing catheter in the patients. CONCLUSIONS: This application of temporary endocardial pacing provided a safe and effective substitute for epicardial pacing in patients who underwent minimally invasive redo tricuspid surgery.

A comprehensive scoping review on transvenous temporary pacing therapy.

Transvenous temporary cardiac pacing therapy (TV-TP) is widely used to treat life-threatening arrhythmias. Yet aggregated evidence on TV-TP is limited. We conducted a systematic scoping review to evaluate indications, access routes and complications of TV-TP, as well as permanent pacemaker therapy (PPM) following TV-TP. Clinical studies concerning TV-TP were identified in Ovid MEDLINE. Case studies and studies lacking complication rates were excluded. To assess complication incidence over time, differences in mean complication rates between 10-year intervals since the introduction of TV-TP were evaluated. We identified 1398 studies, of which 32 were included, effectively including 4546 patients. Indications varied considerably; however TV-TP was most commonly performed in atrioventricular block (62.7%). The preferred site of access was the femoral vein (47.2%). The mean complication rate was 36.7%, of which 10.2% were considered serious. The incidence of complications decreased significantly between 10-year interval groups, but remained high in the most recent time period (22.9%) (analysis of variance; p < 0.001). PPM was required in 64.2% of cases following TV-TP. Atrioventricular block was the primary indication for TV-TP; however indications varied widely. The femoral vein was the most frequent approach. Complications are common in patients undergoing TV-TP. Although a decrease has been observed since its introduction, the clinical burden remains significant. The majority of patients who underwent TV-TP required PPM therapy.

Rapid pacing using the 0.035-in. Retrograde left ventricular support wire in 208 cases of transcatheter aortic valve implantation and balloon aortic valvuloplasty.

INTRODUCTION AND METHOD: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) are now well established percutaneous procedures. These procedures almost always require bursts of rapid ventricular pacing to temporarily reduce cardiac output to facilitate the procedure, usually done via a temporary pacing wire inserted into the right ventricle. We describe a case series of 132 cases of TAVI and 76 BAV done using ventricular pacing via the left ventricular lead by simply connecting one electrode to the patient's skin and one electrode through the left ventricular (LV) wire. RESULTS: All of the 132 TAVI cases (a mixture of Edwards Sapien, Medtronic CoreValve and Boston Scientific Lotus) and 76 BAV were successfully performed using pacing through the LV wire. No BAV patients required temporary pacing wire (TPW) or permanent pacemaker (PPM) insertion. Of the TAVI patients, 6 (4.5%) required TPW during the procedure due to complete heart block to facilitate removal of the LV wire. 1 patient (0.8%) required a PPM urgently due to complete heart block and haemodynamic instability. Twenty eight Patients (21.2%) required PPM following TAVI, 9 of which were within the first 24 hr. Average time to pacemaker implantation was 3.7 days. CONCLUSION: Rapid ventricular pacing via the LV wire is a simple, safe and effective strategy for percutaneous aortic valve intervention and balloon aortic valvuloplasty. It eliminates the need for a temporary pacing wire with its attendant risks in the vast majority of cases. Furthermore, most pacemakers following TAVI are required late, after the first 24 hr period, by which time the TPW has already usually been removed. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Temporary Left Ventricular Pacing: A Desperate Life-saving Measure in Emergency Situation.

Transcutaneous or transvenous pacing of the right ventricle is performed as a routine practice for patients received with symptomatic bradycardia or complete heart block with relative ease in cath lab. However, more and more patients are received with multiple comorbidities, critical condition, and difficult vascular access. In this article, we describe a patient with difficult venous access with tricuspid regurgitation and displaced the right ventricular pacemaker temporary lead undergoing coronary angiography who was managed with emergent nonconventional left ventricular pacing.

Bipolar Versus Unipolar Temporary Epicardial Ventricular Pacing Leads Use in Congenital Heart Disease: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: To compare the pacing parameters of unipolar versus bipolar temporary ventricular epicardial pacing leads. DESIGN: Prospective Randomized Unblinded Controlled Study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease who were anticipated to require temporary ventricular pacing leads were recruited preoperatively: 25 patients were randomized to receive unipolar temporary ventricular epicardial pacing leads; the remaining 25 were randomized to receive bipolar temporary ventricular epicardial leads. The baseline characteristics of the groups were similar. The pacing parameters were measured daily for up to first seven postoperative days (PODs) with the day of surgery recorded as POD 0. RESULTS: On the day of insertion, the mean pacing and sensing thresholds were similar for both unipolar and bipolar leads. Thresholds progressively deteriorated with each subsequent POD. By POD 4, the mean ± standard deviation pacing threshold of ventricular bipolar lead was 2.87 ± 0.37 mA compared with 5.6 ± 0.85 mA for the unipolar leads (P = 0.005). The decrease in sensing threshold of the unipolar ventricular pacing leads was significantly more than that of bipolar leads (by POD 5, 5.7 ± 2.64 vs 10.33 ± 2.8, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the bipolar leads (Medtronic 6495, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) have superior sensing and pacing thresholds in the ventricular position in patients undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease when compared to the unipolar leads (Medical Concepts Europe VF608ABB, Medical Concepts Europe Inc., Buffalo, NY, USA).

Reassessment of the natural evolution and complications of temporary epicardial wires after cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to prospectively reassess the natural evolution and complications of temporary epicardial wires (TEW) after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Observational prospective study. SETTING: Monocentric. PARTICIPANTS: All adult patients having cardiac surgery with TEW insertion, except for those undergoing cardiac transplantation or having permanent pacemakers. INTERVENTIONS: Thresholds were measured daily until wire removal or permanent device insertion. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were performed with p<0.05 as the significance threshold. MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-six patients were enrolled. All had ventricular and only 142 (60%) both ventricular and atrial unipolar FEP15, Ethicon TEW. In most TEW (74%), capture thresholds increased significantly by the first (atrial wires) and by the second (ventricular wires) postoperative day and continued to increase until the fifth day, followed by a plateau. For the others, 2 opposite profiles were noticed: 10% of the total TEW lost their capture function before the fourth postoperative day, whereas 16% remained functional beyond the seventh postoperative day. Both atrial and ventricular sensitivity degraded significantly by the second day. The median energy output used for pacing was 17.5 mA (atrial) and 20 mA (ventricular), regardless of the capture thresholds. Major complications related to TEW were noted in 0.8% of cases. CONCLUSION: Despite widespread use, the natural history of TEW is still a major concern. Pacing with high-energy output is a possible factor leading to capture dysfunction that must be avoided. Education of all operators is needed.

Temporary pacing following cardiac surgery - a reference guide for surgical teams.

Temporary pacing wires are often used following cardiac surgery to optimise the heart rhythm. Although setting and checking temporary pacemakers is typically undertaken by anaesthetists, intensivists, and nursing staff who care for post-cardiac surgical patients, almost all patients with temporary pacing wires are transferred to the ward with the pacing wires left in situ, where surgical, often junior, staff become responsible for temporary pacing wire management. Thus, knowledge is required not only of temporary pacing wire indications, types, and positioning at surgery, but also of practical skills in performing a pacing check, setting the pacemaker, and troubleshooting common problems. The available literature targets clinicians well-versed in temporary pacing wire management. However, this paper provides a practical 'how to' for surgical staff managing temporary pacing wires in a non-critical care environment.